Functional Forms

download Functional Forms

of 17

Transcript of Functional Forms

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    1/17

    QE 8,1

    8 FUNCTIONAL FORMS

    All models-considered thus far linear in both parameters &

    variables.

    1 2 3

    2

    1 2 3 1 2 3

    2

    3

    -linear in parameters (LIP) & linear invariables (LIV)

    - linear in parameters ( , and ),

    but not linear-all-variables [i.e. (e.g. in , appears-power- ' 2 ')]

    whi

    Y b b x b x

    Y b b x b x b b b

    xs b x x

    = + +

    = + +

    2 2

    1 2 2

    lst -not linear in all - parameters since enters -power- 'Y b b x b= +

    But-many economic phenomena-relationship between- variables

    not linear e.g. if -want-calculate elasticity values good, - slope

    coefficient gives - absolute changes - one variable given a unit

    change in the other.

    Hence,-using-alternative functional form, - can still use OLS

    -calculate these elasticities.

    But - use OLS, models must - linear - parameters, but not

    necessarily in their variables.

    Although -several models, we-consider:

    Log-linear model

    Semilog models

    Polynomial regression models

    Regression through the Origin

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    2/17

    QE 8,2

    8.1 THE LOG-LINEAR/ LOG-LOG/ DOUBLE LOG

    MODEL

    (a) The Two-variable Model

    2B

    ii AXY = - non-linear in variables.

    but, taking logarithms,

    22lnlnln XBAY

    i+=

    This can be estimated as

    iiiuXBBY ++=

    *

    221

    *

    *

    1

    *

    2 2

    where ln

    ln ,

    ln and

    is - disturbance term

    i i

    i i

    i

    Y Y

    B A

    X X

    u

    =

    =

    =

    Model-now linear in parameters (and also in the transformed

    variables Y* andX*).

    regression can be estimated with OLS and -estimators - BLUE,

    provided - usual assumptions hold - transformed model.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    3/17

    QE 8,3

    *

    22 *

    22 2 2

    2

    ln

    ln

    i i i i

    i ii i i

    i

    YY Y Y X Y

    BX Y X X X

    X

    = = = =

    i.e.,B2 measures the elasticity ofYwith respect toX2, and thus -

    can - interpreted - the %age change in Y for a given %age

    change inX.

    Thus-in fig. (b) -slope- gives-estimate-price elasticity and since

    it- straight line, the elasticity-constant throughout: known - constant

    elasticity model(use this model only where elasticity - expected -

    constant).

    Example:

    Weekly lotto expenditure (Y) in relation to weekly personaldisposable income (X) ($).

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    4/17

    QE 8,4

    The OLS regression based-data above give:

    LnYi = -0.672 + 0.7256 lnXi

    p = (0.2676) (0.0001) r2 = 0.8644

    and -results - interpreted as ff:

    the expenditure elasticity is 0.73 i.e. if PDI increases by 1%

    expenditure on Lotto on the average increases 0.73%

    (ep

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    5/17

    QE 8,5

    Example: Cobb-Douglas production function:

    KALY =

    where L is total labour input

    Kis total capital input

    A, and are parameters.

    Then, taking logs,

    KlnLlnAlnYln

    ++=

    .

    We can model this as:

    i

    *

    i3

    *

    i21

    *

    i uKBLBBY +++=

    te red i s t urbancaisu

    an dKlnK

    LlnL

    YlnY

    B

    B

    e r c e p t in tBw h e r e

    i

    i

    *

    i

    i

    *

    i

    i*i

    3

    2

    1

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

    =

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    6/17

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    7/17

    OLS regression based-data above give:

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    8/17

    Ln Yi = -1.6524 + 0.3397lnLi + 0.8460lnKi

    p = (0.014) (0.085) (0.000)

    r2 = 0.995 F = 1719.23 (0.000)

    and results can be interpreted as follows:

    Holding capital input constant, if labour input increases by

    1%, on the average, output increases by 0.34%.

    Holding labour input constant, if capital input increases by

    1%, on the average, output increases by 0.85%.

    Estimated coefficients: labour is individually statistically

    significant at 10% level whilst capital is (individually)

    statistically significant at all levels.

    The r2 value of 0.995 is that 99.5% of the variation in the log

    of output is explained by the variation in the logs of capital

    and labour.

    Estimated F value-so highly significant that can reject null

    hypothesis that labour and capital together have no impact on

    output

    Adding the two elasticity coefficients gives -economic

    parameter- returns to scale parameter i.e. response of output

    to a proportional change in inputs.

    Our example- these sum to 1.1857-indicating-increasing

    returns to scale (why?).

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    9/17

    8.2 COMPARING LINEAR AND LOG-

    LINEAR MODELS

    Economic theory does not always specify - particular

    functional form of relationship between variables.

    How-choose between competing models?

    Plot the data: if scattergram shows relationship-

    linear then linear specification might appropriate and if

    shows -non-linear relationship then log-linear model-suitable.

    This principle-however works only simple case of

    two variable regression model, but for multiple regressions

    other guidelines -needed.

    What about choosing models basis of

    comparing r2

    i.e. choose model gives highest r2

    ?

    This approach-own problems?

    To compare r2values two models, the

    dependent variable must-same form. And if different, then -

    not directly comparable.

    Even if-dependent variables both models

    same still need careful since r2 can always-increased adding

    more explanatory variables.

    Hence instead -focussing mainly on r2 ,

    need-consider factors such as :

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    10/17

    Relevance of variables included model.

    Expected signs of coefficients.

    Their statistical significance.

    And other derived measures like elasticity

    coefficients.

    8.3 THE SEMILOG MODELS

    8.3.1 The log-lin (Growth) Model

    Often used to measure growth rates.

    Consider GDP, Y. The growth rate can be modelled as

    follows:

    0 (1 )

    t

    t

    Y Y r= +

    where r is the compound growth rate

    Then:

    0ln ln ln(1 )

    tY Y t r = + +

    This can be modelled as:

    )r1ln(B

    andYlnBwhereutBBYln

    1

    00

    t10t

    +=

    =

    ++=

    The above is called a semilog model because only one

    variable (in this case the dependent) appears in logarithmic form

    called LOG-LIN model.

    Example:Population of United States (millions of people), 1970-1999.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    11/17

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    12/17

    The OLS regression based-data above give:

    Ln(USpop)Yi = 5.3170 + 0.0098tp = (0.0000) (0.0000) r2 = 0.9996

    and -results can be interpreted as follows:

    the slope coefficient of 0.0098 means on the average the

    logof Y (US population) has been increasing at the rate of

    0.0098 per year or alternatively, that Y has been increasing at

    the rate of 0.98% per year.

    i.e. in a log-lin model the slope coefficient measures the

    proportional or relative change in Yfor a given absolute

    change in the explanatory variable, time, in our example.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    13/17

    If this relative change is multiplied by 100, -obtain %age

    change orgrowth rate.

    8.3.2 The lin-log Model

    previous section- considered growth model, - dependent

    variable was log form but explanatory variable was linear form.

    If - dependent variable - linear but - explanatory variable(s)

    is/are logarithmic, called LIN-LOG model.

    e.g. we want to find out how expenditure on services (Y) behaves

    if total personal consumption expenditure (X) increases by a

    certain percentage.

    i.e.1 2

    lni i i

    Y X u = + +

    Thus, 2measures the absolute change in Yif the log ofX

    changes by one unit.

    Example: Quarterly expenditure on services (Y) and total personal

    expenditure (X) 1993-11998-3.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    14/17

    The OLS regression based-data above give:

    2431.69lnX-17907.5Y +=

    if -log ofXchanges by one unit, - absolute change in Y

    will be 2431.69 billions.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    15/17

    And since a change in the log of a number is a relative

    change, to calculate the absolute change in Y for a 1%

    change in X divide the estimated slope coefficient by

    100 (i.e. 2100

    ).

    In-example: ifXchanges by 1 %, on the average, Ywill

    change by 24.31 billions.

    There is no reason why you cannot have more complex

    models with more than one log term or why you cannot combine

    log and linear terms as explanatory variables.

    8.4 POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION MODELS

    Consider the model:

    2 3

    0 1 2 3i i i i i Y X X X u = + + + +

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    16/17

    These models used extensively in applied econometric

    studies relating to production and cost functions.

    Example:

    These polynomial models can be evaluated readily by OLS,

    since even though the variables are perfectly correlated, the

    correlation is not linear.

    The OLS regression based-data above give:

    = + +2 3 141.77 63.48 - 12.96 0.94i i i i Y X X X

    8.5 REGRESSION THROUGH THE ORIGIN

    Yi = 2Xi + ui

    In this model the intercept is absent or zero.

  • 8/6/2019 Functional Forms

    17/17

    If this is the case, the formulae forb2, its variance, and the

    regression variance are modified as shown on pp. 274 of Gujarati

    (the modifications are obvious).

    However, note the following:

    eineed not be zero.

    R2 can lie outside the range 0-1.

    This model should not be used unless there are strong a

    priori reasons for doing so i.e. it is only appropriate if theorystipulates there should be no intercept.