Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

download Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

of 113

Transcript of Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    1/113

    International Maritime University of Panama

    Nautical Science Faculty

    Nautical Engineering Degree with Specialization in Naval Machinery.

    Marine Fuel Quality Control on M! I"M# an$ %ap Feli&

    Presente$ 'y(

    %arlos Enri)ue Samu$io Martinez

    *+,-+/0-1

    March2 34/1

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    2/113

    DEDI%#!I5N

    I dedicate this sea project to my mother for encouraging me to achieve my goals

    and for giving me all her support to accomplish this important project.

    I also dedicate this project to God for giving me the necessary strength that has led

    me where I am today.

    2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    3/113

    #%6N57"ED8MEN!

    I am indebted with my Professors, classmates, and fellow seamen that helped and

    guided me with their experience and knowledge.

    y sincere thanks also goes to !"#$%&' and to all of those who contributed with

    willingness in the development and completion of this project by their knowledge

    and experiences.

    (

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    4/113

    !#9"E 5F %5N!EN!S

    Page

    P:ESEN!#!I5N........................................................................................................I

    DEDI%#!I5N.............................................................................................................II

    #%6N57"ED8MEN!S...........................................................................................III

    !#9"E 5F %5N!EN!S...........................................................................................I;

    !#9"E 5F I""US!:#!I5NS..................................................................................I<

    !#9"E 5F %=#:!S.................................................................................................<

    E..........................................................................................PES............................................................................................1

    2.2.1 Marine Gas Oil (MGO)...........................................................................7 

    2.2.2 Marine Distillate Oil (MDO)....................................................................8 

    2.2.3 Intermediate !el Oil (IO)....................................................................8 

    )

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    5/113

    2.2." #eav$ !el Oil (#O)............................................................................8 

    3.@ :E8U"#!I5NS #ND S!#ND#:S.........................................................................../4

    2.3.1 ISO 8217..............................................................................................1% 

    2.3.2 M&'O..............................................................................................1% 

    2.3.3 ISM.......................................................................................................1% 

    3.* FUE" 5I"  P:5PE:!IES .....................................................................................//

    2.".1 *al+rific val!e......................................................................................11

    2.".2 ,isc+sit$...............................................................................................11

    2.".3 *etane n!mber....................................................................................12 

    2."." *alc!lated carb+n ar+maticit$ inde- (**&I)...................................12 

    2.". *+nrads+n carb+n val!e.....................................................................13

    2."./ &s0 c+ntent..........................................................................................13

    2.".7 S!lp0!r c+ntent....................................................................................13

    2.".8 ater c+ntent.....................................................................................13

    2.". *l+!d p+int...........................................................................................13

    2.".1% +!r p+int..........................................................................................1"

    2.".11 las0 p+int..........................................................................................1"

    2.".12 Specific ravit$..................................................................................1"

    %=#P!E: @( AU#"I!>..........................................................................................3*

    @./ *+&!%G! -!!PI%G  & P#$P!# "! /"&I01....................................................31

    3.1.1 St+rae pr+blems................................................................................27 

    3.1.2 ater in t0e f!el...................................................................................27 

    3.1.3 4!rnabilit$...........................................................................................28  3.1." #i05temperat!re c+rr+si+n................................................................28 

    3.1. +65temperat!re c+rr+si+n.................................................................28 

    3.1./ &brasive imp!rities.............................................................................28 

    @.3 "%-!#I%G........................................................................................................@/

    3.2.1 4!ner !alit$ ....................................................................................31

    3

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    6/113

    3.2.2 G++d 4!nerin ractice ....................................................................31

    3.2.3 Orderin b!ners ................................................................................31

    3.2." Selectin t0e rades +f f!el re9!ired ..................................................31

    @.@ "! $I 0!40....................................................................................................@*

    3.3.1 Samplin..............................................................................................3"

      3.3.1.2 Samplin r+ced!res.................................................................3"

    3.3.2 M&'O &nne- ,I samples................................................................3"

    3.3.3 Samples f+r &nal$sis...........................................................................3"

    3.3." Onb+ard testin...................................................................................3"

    @.* 40$#&G!  &%5 +&%5I%G.....................................................................................@*

    ).).6 5ifferent uel 0ypes +andling..............................................................()

    ).).2 +eating................................................................................................(3

    ).).( unker 0anks......................................................................................(3

    ).).) 4ettling tanks........................................................................................(3

    ).7.3 4ervice tanks........................................................................................(3

    ).7.8 ayor uel 4torage Problems.............................................................(3

    •  Sl!de................................................................................................38 

    •  ibres.................................................................................................38 

    •  O-idati+n r+d!cts.............................................................................38 

    •  Micr+bial *+ntaminati+n....................................................................38 

    •  Dirt......................................................................................................38 

    •  inc+mpatibilit$....................................................................................38 

    ).).7 uel Processing..................................................................................3 

    • !el :ransfer ......................................................................................(9

    • Settiln tans t+ service tans...........................................................(9

    • .O +verfl+6 and leas.......................................................................(9

    @.- F.5 !:E#!MEN!.................................................................................................@-

    3..1 Separatin +rces In :0e Settlin :an..............................................38 

    @.-.3 SU%!I5N S!:#INE:S.......................................................................................*4

    3..3 *leanin b$ centrif!e........................................................................"% 

    8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    7/113

    • 0he purifier.........................................................................................)(

    • 0he clarifier.........................................................................................)(

    • *ombinations.....................................................................................)(

    *entrifuging high density fuels ..........................................................))

    @.-.* Filters..................................................................................................)2

    • *old filters .........................................................................................))

    • +ot filters ...........................................................................................))

    • ine filters ..........................................................................................))

    • self cleaning filters .............................................................................))

    @.-.- #lternative metho$s...........................................................................)2

    • echanical homogenisers ................................................................))

    • "ltrasonic 5evices ............................................................................))

    •  4tatic filter modules...........................................................................))

    • back:flushing filter modules................................................................))

    @.-.1 %hemical treatment............................................................................))

    • iosides .............................................................................................))

    •  uel stabilisers..................................................................................))

    • uel aditives.......................................................................................))

    @.-., !he $aily service tanB........................................................................))

    @.-. #fter the service tanB.........................................................................))

    %=#P!E: *( FUE" ;IS%5SI!>............................................................................*-

    -./ ;IS%5SI!> #ND FUE" AU#"I!>.............................................................................*1

    -.3 M#:INE FUE" ;IS%5SI!> UNDE:S!#NDIN8...........................................................*,.2.1 0at is visc+sit$.................................................................................."8 

    .2.2 #+6 is c+atin visc+sit$ affected........................................................."8 

    .2.3 #+6 is visc+sit$ meas!red.................................................................."8 

    .2." :raditi+nal appr+ac0 t+ meas!rin visc+sit$......................................."8 

    -.@ ;IS%5SI!> #ND I!S EFFE%!S 5N DIESE" EN8INE.................................................*

    7

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    8/113

    .3.1 +6 !el ,isc+sit$..............................................................................."8 

    .3.1 ;nine +perati+n 6it0 t++ 0i0 visc+sit$............................................."8 

    -.* M#:INE FUE" ;IS%5SI!> 6EEPIN8.....................................................................*0

    5.4.1 Heating of fuel oil .............................................................................../ 3

    5.4.2 Viscosity keeping during treatment ................................................./ 3

    • 4eparation of heavy fuel....................................................................))

    5.4.3 Viscosity keeping of te transfer system......................................./ 3

    • uel oil settling tanks..........................................................................))

    • uel oil system and service tanks......................................................))

    • Pumping.............................................................................................))

    -.*.* 6eeping ;iscosity $uring manoevering an$ stan$+still perio$s. ./ 3

    • Preparations before starting on heavy fuel........................................))

    • $perating and manoeuvring on heavy fuel........................................))

    • 4topping the main engine when operating on heavy fuel..................))

    • *hange over between heavy fuel and diesel oil................................))

    o 4witching from diesel oil to heavy fuel oil...............................))

    o 4witching from heavy fuel oil to diesel oil...............................))

    -.- ;iscosity %ontrol #rrangement .....................................................................1 @-.-./ ;iscosity %ontrol...............................................................................! 3

    -.-.3 Measuring Devices............................................................................! 3

    • *apilar 0ube 4ensor .....................................................................))

    •  &ttenuation 4ensor .......................................................................))

    -.-.@ Propotional %ontrol.........................................................................../ 3

    -.-.* PI #n$ PID %ontrol ............................................................................/ 3

    %=#P!E: -( FUE" S>S!EM CM! I"M#..............................................................4

    1./ M#IN EN8INE.....................................................................................................-,

    1.3 8ENE:#!5: EN8INES........................................................................................-0

    1.@ #US!EM...................................................1/

    9

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    9/113

    /.3.1 #O S$stem......................................................................................../2 

    /.3.2 Gas Oil S$stem..................................................................................../"

    %=#P!E: 1( 5N 95#:D E...............................................................................................................,@

    "IS! 5F :EFE:EN%ES.........................................................................................,,

    ;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    10/113

    !#9"E 5F I""US!:#!I5NS

    Page

    i!re 1....................................................................................................................7% 

    i!re 2....................................................................................................................7/ 

    i!re 3....................................................................................................................77 

    i!re "....................................................................................................................7

    i!re ....................................................................................................................88 

    i!re /....................................................................................................................8

    6

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    11/113

    !#9"E 5F %=#:!S

    Page

    0able 6 ain 0ypes $f uel $il..................................................................................7

    0able 2 I4$ *aracteristics.......................................................................................62

    0able ( 0ypical values for standard fuels.................................................................67

    0able ) fuel oil specification of an => low speed diesel engine of *ap elix. . .67

    0able 3 +eavy uels Problems................................................................................6;

    0able 8 Purifier Particle #emoval !fficiency............................................................)7

    66

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    12/113

    E

    0his project has been made with the intention of providing insights on the current

    and appropriate practices in the handling of fuel oil onboard. 0he objective is to

    present the precautions to be taken to keep and appropriate fuel ?uality and

    viscosity on board, and the actions to take once one is working with it. 0o get a grip

    on fuel handling in general, personal research has been done on the topic.

    oreover, a general knowledge recompilation about fuel ?uality and viscositytheory was also done. 0his was followed by a study of the current difficulties

    involving it and an approach to each aspect affecting the ?uality and viscosity of 

    the fuel on board *ap elix and 0 Ilma.

    Precaution while handling fuel covering the bunkering, storage, analysis, transfers

    and treatment is essential. Preparing the ship and crew beforehand will not only

    prove an advantage but also necessary when encountering any unusual

    conditions. 0he crew should follow, whenever possible, the recommendations of 

    the manufacturers, ship builder and company, paying special attentions to the

    current regulations.

    62

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    13/113

    0hese days, fuel ?uality and viscosity can be kept in the appropriate levels to fit in

    the manufacturer@s re?uirements if good practices are carried out on board.

    IN!:5DU%!I5N

    uel oil has posed an increasing problem to the ship operators. $ver the

    years, any new regulation and processes become a challenge to the current

    plants facilities which most of the time have not been designed to comply with

    these new operating conditions. !very time more precautions have to be takenwhen handling fuel. 0he engineers have to be aware that they can encounter with

    low ?uality fuels, different types and that each type of fuel must re?uire to be

    treated and handled in different ways. Inapropiate working conditions for the type

    of fuel being handled can led to serious implications in safety of life and machinery.

    Poor fuel ?uality will sometimes restrict the normal operation of the purifiers,

    affecting its treatment rate and time. *onstant adjustments must be done to cope

    with the current operation conditions. 0hese can affect the use of separation

    e?uipment by producing fast accumulation of sludge and, subse?uently, changes in

    the interface position. >hen it comes to the machinery, poor fuel ?uality produces

    wearing on the surface of cylinder liners and pistons. It surely affects the fuel

    pumps since they are extremely sensitive by obstruction or seiAure. !ven if 

    6(

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    14/113

    appropriate treatment is done, special attention to viscosity, temperatures and

    pressures must be kept.

    ecause of their direct concern with fuel, the engineers must get ac?uainted

    with future fuel re?uirements and prepare the systems in advance in the area they

    expect to deal with. 0hey should make use of all the information and resources

    available and most importantly, always proceed with caution.

    uel ?uality keeping calls for special knowledge and precautions even in

    new building ships designed for new regulations and standards. uel ?uality

    keeping poses several problems of its own. 5ifferent conditions can be

    encountered with each bunkered fuel and it can bring about many unusual

    problems for seamen having little or no experience on this regard.

    urther on, we will discuss how to get prepared for these types of 

    conditions, different types of fuel and fuel problems that can arise. >e will also

    discuss necessary actions to take when encountered with some of these problems.

    %=#P!E: /

    !=E :ESE#:%= P:59"EM

    6)

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    15/113

    In this chapter I will propose the objectives of the project, general and specific and

    the delimitations and limitations.

    /./ Statement of the Pro'lem

    uel ?uality and viscosity keeping can be very harsh. If the engineers of the

    vessel are not prepared the outcome could be disastrous. It is important to know

    what to expect when encountered with different fuels ?ualities and grades, and to

    understand what is needed to be done under these conditions to keep fuel as

    re?uired by the machinery.

    /.3 ?ustification

    uel ?uality keeping is not to be taken lightlyB even the most experienced

    engineer can find difficult to deal with problems related to poor fuel ?uality and

    viscosity keeping. 0horough preparations need to be made to assure a proper 

    ?uality avoiding by these way greater, dangerous and expensive issues. 0here are

    essential tools and information re?uired to conduct effective, safe, fuel treatment

    that must be taken in account.

    4tarting a purifiers main engines, generator and boilers is something all

    engineers are more readily prepared for. +owever, there is a risk of suddenly

    meeting systems fail, clogging, and machinery damage if the appropriate fuel

    specification is not supply.

     

    4ame as every ship is uni?ue, every fuel type has own variations in their 

    composition. &lthough, some people can easily get ac?uainted with the conditions

    of some ship or fuel, ignoring these factors could lead to plant failure. ig efforts

    have been made to give a guidance or a trace of the ?uality fuel you are bunkering

    and dealing with. $ne of these efforts is the I4$ 9267. >ith this guidance it is

    much easier to follow the treatment re?uired according to the type fuel you are to

    deal with. ut this canCt assure you that the same treatment can be followed for a

    2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    16/113

    same fuel grade. !ngineers must go deeper in order to make sure that proper fuel

    ?uality is being supplied to the machinery.

    Increases in world regulations, particularly on the low sulfur emissions for 

    4!*&Cs is opening an incredibly difficult challenge for fuel ?uality and viscosity

    keeping. 4ome of these fuels are in total opposite corners of treatment and

    handling. >hile something is good for one fuel, it is total ?uite the opposite for 

    other fuels. &ppropriate training and familiariAation must be given to the crew for 

    dealing with these new regulations. $n the other hand, new and increasingly

    sophisticated ships, are being built to cope with the high new standards.

    .

    /.@ 8eneral 5'ectives

    0o provide information of the risks, precautions and procedures to follow before,

    during, and after dealing with fuel oil in order to keep and appropriate ?uality

    showing at the same time the connection between fuel ?uality and viscosity

    keeping. aking use specifically of experiencesB !uronav guidanceCs and

    procedures. &s well as classification society and manufactures recommendation

    and manuals in *ap elix and 0 Ilma.

    /.@./Specific 5'ectives

    6. 0o create conscience regarding the risk invoving fuel handling on board.

    2. 0o present seamen with guidelines for actions to take and general information

    when dealing with fuel ?uality and viscosity keeping .

    (. 0o help the engineers with a guidance to perform a safe fuel system treatment

    and handling onboard.

    ). 0o leave a legacy to those cadets interested in understanding the aspects

    involving fuel ?uality on board a !uronav tanker.

    (

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    17/113

    /.* Delimitation

    6. 0his project is aimed to engine cadets, who need to understand the basics of 

    fuel ?uality and viscosity keeping, the personal safety precautions necessary to

    take when handling fuel weather and measures necessary in 0 Ilma and *ap

    elix.

    /.- "imitations

    6. ost of the research was done with the aid of books and manuals on board due

    to limited time for scheduled maintenances on board the vessel.

    2. uel ?uality and viscosity keeping system are only bounded to the systems and

    ship specific manuals and recommendations for 2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    18/113

    3./ !he Marine Fuels %hallenge

    uel remains one of the highest single cost factors in running a ship and also the

    source of the most potent operating problems. 0he reason for this is that new

    refining techni?ues, introduced as a result of political developments in the iddle

    !ast in 6;7(D7), have meant that fluid catalytic cracking and this breaking have

    produced a more concentrated residual fuel of very poor ?uality. 0his residual fuel

    is the heavy fuel oil traditionally supplied to ships as bunkers and used in the

    majority of motor ships of a reasonable siAe for the main engine. 5espite the high

    cost of these poor ?uality residual fuels owners generally have no alternative but to

    burn them, though some still prefer to use even more expensive intermediate

    grades produced as a result of mixing residual fuel oil with distillate.

    0he problems are reflected in the effects on the engine in terms of wear and tear 

    and corrosion resulting from harmful components in the fuel. It is the duty of the

    ship@s engineer to be aware of these harmful constituents, their effect on the

    operation of the engines and the solutions available to counter the harmful

    properties.

    3.3 Marine Fuel !ypes

    0here are three major types of marine fuelE distillate fuel, residual fuel, and a

    combination of the two to create a fuel type known as Fintermediate fuel oil HI$.

    In this section, the various grades of marine fuel are introduced using the collo?uial

    industry names to group the different fuel types. 0he purpose of this discussion is

    to introduce the reader to marine fuels in general to enable assimilation of more

    nuanced discussions that are presented in the chapter number three of this report.

    we will make a technical discussion of marine fuel regulations involving the names

    and standards.

    5istillate and residual fuels are blended into various combinations to derive the

    different grades of marine fuel oil. !a'le / lists examples of the major marine fuel

    3

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    19/113

    grades and their collo?uial industry names. In terms of cost, distillates are more

    expensive than intermediates, and residual fuels are the least expensive.

    !a'le / Main !ypes 5f Fuel 5il

    Fuel

    !ype

    Fuel 8ra$e %ollo)uial In$ustry Name

    Distillate DM

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    20/113

    because it can be blended with residual fuel. 5$ is manufactured by blending

    5* with 6

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    21/113

    any auxiliary engines have now been designed to operate on residual fuels.

    >here the residues of the refining process are unsuitable for fuel purposes then

    blending is often carried out to bring the fuel within a recogniAed specification.

    3.@ :egulations #n$ Stan$ar$s

    !xisting regulations regarding marine bunker fuels provide an important backdrop

    for the modeling conducted in this analysis and, thus, are summariAed in this

    section.

     

    any shipping companies have additional standards for their vesselsB these take

    into account the treatment facilities onboard and past service experience with

    different fuels.

    0hese company standards often have specifications not included in the I4$ 9267

    standard.

    0he engine manufacturer@s recommendations will take into account specific

    re?uirements for their engines, with particular reference to design limitations andservice experience.

    1ou should try and make yourself aware of the content of I4$ 9267, and also any

    specific re?uirements that your company or the engine manufacturer has for the

    fuel for the machinery on your current vessel.

    0his will help you understand the handling and treatment re?uirements and will

    also highlight possible problems you may have when using the fuels onboard.

    3.@./ M#:P5"

    0he International aritime $rganiAation@s HI$ FP$ &nnex 'I sets out a

    series of regulations impacting international marine bunker fuels. 0hese new

    9

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    22/113

    regulations center on limits for emissions of nitrous oxides H%$x, sulfur oxides

    H4$x, and volatile organic compounds H'$*s. uel ?uality regulations in &nnex

    'I have been implemented in the form of the I4$:9267 2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    23/113

    N Density(  which is re?uired to determine purification settings and is used to

    calculate the amount of fuel bunkered.

    N ;iscosity( which is expressed as a fluid@s resistance to flow. In everyday terms

    this is Mthickness@. 'iscous Hthick fuels re?uire preheating to reduce the viscosity

    and enable good purification, injection and combustion in the engine cylinder.

    N Flashpoint(  of the fuel indicates the temperature at which a fuel vapour is

    produced and can be ignited. In accordance with 4$&4 re?uirements, the flash

    point must be above 8< degrees *elsius. H0his does not apply to fuel that will be

    used for emergency purposes such as generators, fire pumps and lifeboat

    engines.

    N #luminium #n$ Silicon C%atalytic fines( are remnants of the cracking process

    at the refinery. 0hey are introduced as a catalyst to assist with the refining in a

    catalytic cracking process. 0hese highly abrasive particles can cause rapid wear of 

    engine components and can be difficult to remove or separate using the ship@s fuel

    treatment e?uipment

    0he table below iIIustrates a shortened version of the new I4$ 9267E2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    24/113

    t0e t0ird letter< >< &< 4< e< ... < ?< 60ic0 indicates t0e partic!lar pr+perties int0e pr+d!ct specificati+n (ISO 8217)< +r resid!al f!els< a n!mber 60ic0c+rresp+nds t+ t0e ma-im!m inematic visc+sit$< in mm2@s< at % % c 

    f+r e-ample a pr+d!ct ma$ be desinated in t0e c+mplete f+rm< e.. ISO55

    'MG 18%< +r in abbreviated f+rm< e.. 5'MG 18% 

    !a'le 3 IS5 %aracteristics

    4ourceE I4$ 9267 ourth !dition 2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    25/113

    any of the procedures that are used to ensure safe, pollution free bunkering and

    F!sae +f t0e f!elA  will have originated from these anti:pollution regulations.

    0he following sections we will look at some typical procedures that are necessary

    when receiving, handling and Fusing fuel oil bunkers on board ship.

    1ou should always make reference to your own vessels@ specific procedures when

    carrying out any bunkering operations on board.

    3.* Fuel 5il Properties

    0he ?uality of a fuel oil is generally determined by a number of specific parameters

    or proportions of metals or impurities in a given sample of the particular fuel. 4uch

    parameters includeE viscosityB specific gravityB flash pointB *onradson carbonB

    asphaltenes contentB sulphur contentB water contentB vanadium contentB and

    sodium content. 0wo parameters of traditional importance have been the calorific

    value and viscosity. 'iscosity, once the best pointer to a fuel@s ?uality or degree of 

    heaviness, is now considered as being only partially a major ?uality criterion

    because of the possible effects of constituents of a fuel.

    3.*./ %alorific value

    0he calorific value or heat of combustion of a fuel oil is a measure of hydrogen thatis, an amount of hydrogen e?ual to one:eighth the weight of the oxygen is nullified.

    0he sulphur compounds are assumed to have their combustion heat nullified by

    the oxy:nitrogen ones. *alorific value is given in kcalDkg of fuel.

    0he calorific value as determined by a bomb calorimeter is the gross or Mhigher@

    value which includes the latent heat of water vapour formed by the combustion of 

    the hydrogen. 0he net or Mlower@ calorific value is that obtained from subtracting this

    latent heat. 0he difference between the gross and net values is usually about 8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    26/113

    3.*.3 

    ;iscosity

    0he viscosity of an oil is a measure of its resistance to flow which decreases

    rapidly with increase in temperature. +eating is necessary to thin the heavy fuels of 

    high viscosity in current common use and ease their handling.

    3.*.@ %etane num'er 

    0he cetane number of a fuel is a measure of the ignition ?uality of the oil under the

    conditions in a diesel engine. 0he higher the cetane number, the shorter the time

    between fuel injection and rapid pressure rise. & more usable pointer of ignition

    ?uality is the diesel index, expressed asE

    where G O specific gravity at 8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    27/113

    carbon on fuel injection noAAles. 0he #amsbottom method has largely replaced the

    *onradson method of carbon residue testing, but it gives roughly the same results.

    3.*.1 #sh content

    0he ash content is a measure of inorganic impurities in the fuel. 0ypically, these are

    sand, nickel, aluminium, silicon, sodium and vanadium. 0he most troublesome are

    sodium and vanadium which form a mixture of sodium sulphate and vanadium

    pentoxide, which melt and adhere to engine components, particularly exhaust

    valves.

    3.*., Sulphur content

    0his has no influence on combustion but high sulphur levels can be dangerous

    because of acid formation, mentioned earlier in this chapter. In recent years there

    has been a tendency to e?uate sulphur content with cylinder liner wear, but

    opinions differ on this matter. H4ee also chapter on !missions.

    6)

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    28/113

    3.*. 7ater content

    0his is the amount of water in a given sample of the oil and is usually determined

    by centrifuging or distillation.

    3.*.0 %lou$ point

    0he cloud point of an oil is the temperature at which crystalliAation of paraffin wax

    begins to be observed when the oil is being cooled down.

    3.*./4 Pour point

    0his is the lowest temperature at which an oil remains fluid and thus is important to

    know for onboard handling purposes. &n alternative is the solidifying point or the

    highest temperature at which the oil remains solid. It usually lies some ( * below

    the pour point. &ccording to one major enginebuilder, the lowest admissible

    temperature of the fuel should be about 3Q6< * above the pour point to secure

    easy pumping.

    3.*.// Flash point

    0he flash point is defined as the lowest temperature at which an oil gives off 

    combustible vapours, or the point at which airDoil vapour mixture can be ignited by

    a flame or spark.

    components, fuels can have identical densities but widely varying individual

    component densities. &part from being an indicator of the Mheaviness@ of a fuel,

    when measured by a hydrometer the specific gravity can be used to calculate the

    ?uantity of fuel by weight in a tank of given dimensions.

    3.*./3 Specific gravity

    0his is normally expressed in kgDm( or gDcm( at 63 *. &s the density of the fuel

    depends upon the density of the individual

    63

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    29/113

    3.- !ypical values for stan$ar$ fuels

    !a'le @ !ypical values for stan$ar$ fuels

     

    Ilma manuals 34/*

    0he following is the fuel oil specification of an => low speed diesel engine of 

    *ap elix. 0he properties are considered the worst in each case that can be burnt

    in these particular engine.

    !a'le * Fuel oil specification of Man 97 low spee$ $iesel engine of %ap Feli&

    68

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    30/113

    %=#P!E: @

    AU#"I!> 6EEPIN8

    67

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    31/113

    @./ %hallenge Beeping a Proper fuel Auality

    P#$!4 >I0+ +!&'1 "!4

    0he problems of present and future heavy residual fuels can be categoriAed asE

    6. 4torage and handling.

    2. *ombustion ?uality and burnability.

    (. *ontaminants, resulting in corrosion andDor damage to engine componentsE

    for example, burnt out exhaust valves.

    !a'le - =eavy Fuels Pro'lems

    69

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    32/113

    @././ Storage pro'lems0he problems of storage in tanks of bunker fuel result from build:up of sludge

    leading to difficulties in handling. 0he reason for the increase in sludge build:up is

    because heavy fuels are generally blended from a cracked heavy residual using a

    lighter cutter stock resulting in a problem of incompatibility.

    0his occurs when the asphaltene or high molecular weight compound suspended

    in the fuel is precipitated by the addition of the cutter stock or other dilutents. 0he

    sludge which settles in the bunker tanks or finds its way to the fuel lines tends to

    overload the fuel separators with a resultant loss of burnable fuel, and perhaps

    problems with fuel injectors and wear of the engine through abrasive particles.

    0o minimiAe the problems of sludging the ship operator has a number of options.

    +e may ask the fuel supplier to perform stability checks on the fuel that he is

    providing. unkers of different origins should be kept segregated wherever 

    possible and water contamination kept to a minimum. Proper operation of the

    settling tanks and fuel treatment plant is essential to prevent sludge from entering

    the engine itself. & detergent:type chemical additive can be used to reduce the

    formation of sludge in the bunker tanks.

    6;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    33/113

    @./.3 7ater in the fuel

    >ater has always been a problem because it finds its way into the fuel during

    transport and storage on the ship. ree water can seriously damage fuel injection

    e?uipment, cause poor combustion and lead to excessive cylinder liner wear. If it

    happens to be seawater, it contains sodium which will contribute to corrosion when

    combined with vanadium and sulphur during combustion.

    >ater can normally be removed from the bunkers by proper operation of 

    separators and properly designed settling and daily service tanks. +owever, where

    the specific gravity of the fuel is the same or greater than the water, removal of the

    water is difficult or indeed not possible and for this reason the maximum specific

    gravity of fuel supplied for ship@s bunkers has generally been set at

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    34/113

    which employ a reactive combustion catalyst can also be used to reduce the

    products of incomplete combustion.

    @./.* =igh+temperature corrosion

    'anadium is the major fuel constituent influencing high:temperature corrosion. It

    cannot be removed in the pre:treatment process and it combines with sodium and

    sulphur during the combustion process to form eutectic compounds with melting

    points as low as 3(< *. 4uch molten compounds are very corrosive and attack

    the protective oxide layers on steel, exposing it to corrosion.

    !xhaust valves and piston crowns are very susceptible to high temperature

    corrosion. $ne severe form is where mineral ash deposits form on valve seats,

    which, with constant pounding, cause dents leading to a small channel through

    which the hot gases can pass. 0he compounds become heated and then attack the

    metal of the valve seat.

     &s well as their capacity for corrosion, vanadium, sulphur and sodium deposit out

    during combustion to foul the engine components and, being abrasive, lead to

    increased liner and ring wear. 0he main defence against high temperature

    corrosion has been to reduce the running temperatures of engine components,

    particularly exhaust valves, to levels below that at which the vanadium compounds

    are melted. Intensively cooled cylinder covers, liners, and valves, as well as

    rotators fitted to valves, have considerably reduced these problems. 4pecial

    corrosion resistant coatings such as 4tellite and plasma coatings have been

    applied to valves.

    @./.- "ow+temperature corrosion

    4ulphur is generally the cause of low:temperature corrosion. In the combustion

    process the sulphur in the fuel combines with oxygen to form sulphur dioxide

    H4$2. 4ome of the sulphur dioxide further combines to form sulphur trioxide

    H4$(. 0he sulphur trioxide formed during combustion reacts with moisture to form

    26

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    35/113

    sulphuric acid vapours, and where the metal temperatures are below the acid dew

    point H68< * the vapours condense as sulphuric acid, resulting in corrosion.

    0he obvious method of reducing this problem is to maintain temperatures in the

    engine above the acid dew point through good distribution and control of the

    cooling water.

    0here is always the danger that an increase in temperatures to avoid low

    temperature corrosion may lead to increased high temperature corrosion. &ttack on

    cylinder liners and piston rings as a result of high sulphur content fuels has been

    effectively reduced by controlled temperature of the cylinder liner walls and alkaline

    cylinder lubricating oils.

    @./.1 #'rasive impurities

    0he normal abrasive impurities in fuel are ash and sediment compounds. 4olid

    metals such as sodium, nickel, vanadium, calcium and silica can result in

    significant wear to fuel injection e?uipment, cylinder liners, piston rings and ring

    grooves.

    +owever, a comparatively new contaminant is the metallic catalyst fines composed

    of very hard and abrasive alumina and silica particles which are a cause for much

    concern. 0hese particles carry over in the catalytic cracking refinery process and

    remain suspended in the residual bottom fuel for extended periods. It has been

    known for brand new fuel pumps to be worn out in a matter of days, to the point

    where an engine fails to start through insufficient injection pressure, as a result of 

    catalyst fines in the fuel. 0he only effective method of combating abrasive particles

    is correct fuel pre:treatment. 4eparator manufacturers recommend that the

    separators should be operated in series Ha purifier followed by a clarifier at

    throughputs as low as 2< per cent of the rated value.

    22

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    36/113

    @.3 9unBering

    4hips burning +$ in combustion e?uipment will, at some time in the voyage

    cycle, have to bunker fuel to replenish what has been consumed.

     unkering may take place offshore, at anchor or alongside. It may be pumped

    from road tanker, bunker barge or another tanker or ship.

    @.3./ 9unBer Auality

    0his is probably the most common area for complaint. & typical wording is as

    followsE

    B:0e c0arterers s0all s!ppl$ b!ners +f a 9!alit$ s!itable f+r b!rnin in t0e s0ip=s

    enines and a!-iliaries and 60ic0 c+nf+rm t+ t0e ISO 9267 "t0 ;diti+n.

    :0e +6ners reserve t0eir ri0t t+ mae a c@aim aainst t0e c0arterers f+r an$ 

    damae t+ t0e main enines +r t0e a!-iliaries ca!sed b$ t0e !se +f !ns!itable

    f!els +r f!els n+t c+mpl$in 6it0 t0e ISO 9267 "t0 ;diti+n standards +r 60ic0

    +t0er6ise pr+ve !ns!itable f+r b!rnin in t0e s0ip=s enines +r a!-iliaries. :0e+6ners s0all n+t be 0eld resp+nsible f+r an$ red!cti+n in t0e s0ip=s speed 

     perf+rmance and@+r increased b!ner c+ns!mpti+n< n+r f+r an$ time l+st and +t0er 

    c+nse9!ences.B 

     &nother typical clause relates to fuel oil sampling and analysisE

    B:0ree samples +f all f!el s0all be taen d!rin deliver$< sealed and sined b$ 

    s!ppliers< *0ief ;nineer and *0arterers= aent< eac0 +f 60+m s0+!ld retain +ne

    sample. If an$ c@aim s0+!ld arise in respect +f t0e 9!alit$ +r specificati+n +f t0e

    f!el s!pplied< t0e O6ners and *0arterers aree t+ 0ave samples +f t0e f!el 

    anal$Ced b$ a m!t!all$ areed anal$st.B 

    2(

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    37/113

    @.3.3 8oo$ 9unBering Practice

    etween the refinery and the delivery of the bunkers onboard, via any intermediary

    storage that might be re?uired, are many opportunities for the fuel to become

    contaminatedE sometimes so badly that it may damage the ship@s machinery and

    associated systems. !specially threatening is the presence in the fuel of catfines

    resulting from the catalytic cracking stage at the refinery in which the oil is heated

    over aluminium silicate catalyst, a substance harder than metal.

    Immediate and longer term risks to ship and machinery are associated with poor 

    fuel ?uality, including fire and explosion, loss of main engine power andDor auxiliary

    power black:out, and difficulty in fulfilling charter party clauses with regard to ship

    speed, engine power and specific fuel consumption.

    ittle legislation exists to govern bunker fuel but the parameters of the international

    standard I4$ 9267 have been widened in recent years. 4ince most risk

    associated with bunkers impacts on the ship and owner Heven though the fuel is

    bought by and belongs to any charterer the best protection is for all parties to

    know exactly what fuel is needed for the vessel, and then to test that the delivered

    bunkers meet these re?uirements. ost problems and disputes can be traced back

    either to the ordering or sampling of the fuel. 0he traditional way of ordering

    bunkers has been by ?uoting I$ grades, which only refer to viscosity at 3< *,

    but this can be technically inaccurate. It is more important in the first instance to

    make sure that the fuel is suitable for the machinery and fuel system in which it will

    be used. 0he best starting point is the fuel specification provided by the engine

    builder. It makes commercial sense for ship operators to follow a recogniAed

    specification such as I4$ 9267. 0his will help to secure a charter party and should

    help to secure economically priced bunkers worldwide. 0he charter party clause

    should clearly state what fuel is re?uired and may also include other aspects, such

    as segregation, testing and the services of a surveyor for ?uantity determination.

    0he charter party clause should also be kept as simple as possible, loyd@s

    #egister recommending the following wording as an exampleE M*harterer to provide

    all fuel oil and diesel re?uired, in accordance with I4$ 9267E6;97, Grades # . . .

    2)

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    38/113

    and 5 as updated from time to time@. 4hip operators are encouraged to stipulate

    that the bunker supplied is Mfit for its intended use@ on the delivery note.

     

     &mong the key parameters of a fuel specification areE

    N & maximum viscosityE this is re?uired to be within the engine builder@s

    specified limitB it is also a guide to the storage and handling properties of the fuel.

    N & maximum density or specific gravityE dictated by the ship@s fuel treatment

    plant.

    N & minimum flash pointE dictated by safety regulations for the storage of fuel

    at sea.

    N & maximum pour pointE this limits the amount of heating re?uired to store

    and handle the fuel.

    N & maximum water content.

    N & maximum sulphur contentE may be necessary to satisfy regional

    environmental regulations but is also desirable to limit the corrosive products of 

    combustion and to ensure that the lubricants used in the engine can cope with

    these products.

    @.3.@ 5r$ering 'unBers

    0o ensure that the correct ?uantity and type of fuel is onboard at any particular time

    it is necessary that bunkering operations are planned correctly.

    If it is left to the *hief !ngineer onboard to order the bunkers, the bunker plan will

    have to be drawn up based on information about the expected trade pattern of the

    vessel.

    +e will have to take into account various factors when calculating ?uantities and

    forming his bunker plan such asE

    • voyage length

    • vessel speed re?uirements and therefore expected fuel

    consumption rate

    • re?uired fuel reserve : legislative restrictions

    23

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    39/113

    • available storage capacity In addition he may have to take

    into account other factors such asE

    • charterer@s re?uirements

    • cost and availability of fuel at future ports of call $nce the

    re?uired ?uantity has been calculated then the fuel can be

    ordered.

    @.3.* Selecting the gra$es of fuel re)uire$

    5ifferent grades of fuel may be re?uired for the various machinery and e?uipment

    fitted onboard the vessel. !ven for those vessels using the same fuel for all of the

    machinery onboard it will be normal to carry three grades of fuel to meet different

    operating conditions. 1ou should be aware that current air pollution regulations

    contained in P$ &nnex 'I limit the level of sulphur allowed in marine fuel,

    with a reduced level in 4$x !mission *ontrol &reas H4!*&s.

    P$ &nnex 'I has timetables for the reduction of the maximum allowable

    sulphur content in fuels both inside and outside 4!*&s. %ational legislation, for 

    example within !uropean "nion countries, may re?uire even lower sulphur levels.

    It is therefore important that the vessel@s trading pattern is taken into account

    when selecting the grades of fuel to be bunkered.

    If the trading pattern of your vessel includes operation within a 4!*& a

    ?uantity of low sulphur fuel will have to be carried onboard.

    0his may also be the case if the future trading pattern of the vessel is

    uncertain.0his will normally be in addition to the regular grades of fuel re?uired, as

    fuel tends to become more expensive as the sulphur level is reduced.

    28

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    40/113

    @.@ Fuel 5il !est

    To be able to check whether the specification indicated and/or the stipulated delivery

    conditions have been complied with, we recommend that a minimum of one sample of

    each bunker fuel lot be retained. In order to ensure that the sample is representative

    for the oil bunkered, a sample should be drawn from the transfer pipe at the start, in

    the middle, and at the end of the bunkering period.

    The samples received from the bunkering company are frequently not identical with the

    heavy fuel oil actually bunkered. It is also appropriate to verify the heavy fuel oil

    properties stated in the bunker documents, such as density, viscosity, and pour point. If

    these values deviate from those of the heavy fuel oil bunkered, there is a risk that the

    heavy fuel oil separator and the preheating temperature are not set correctly for the

    given injection viscosity.

    @.@./ 

    Sampling

    0here is no point in taking a sample of the fuel being delivered unless it is a

    representative sample.

    0here are accepted procedures for collecting, labelling, distribution and onboard

    retention of the sample.

    1ou should be aware of the re?uirements for your vessel and follow them carefully.

    It is recommended that only the correct containers are used for samples, and that

    the sample is obtained by a continuous drip method so that it represents the fuel

    delivered throughout the bunkering operation.

    @.@./.3 Sampling Proce$ures

    >hen bunkering starts, place a container under the sampler, open the sampler 

    valve fully and flush the sampler with fuel. It is good practice to check this sample

    from fuel initially pumped onboard as it may be high in water content from the

    bunker barge@s tanks. &fter flushing the sampler, close the valve and attach a

    27

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    41/113

    suitable clean container to the valve. &djust the needle valve to give a slow and

    steady drip. 0ime the fill rate so that it will provide for sufficient estimated sample

    over the expected delivery period.

    R P$ sample point showing cubitainer attached

    If the sample container fills during the bunkering period, remove it and place an

    empty

    sample container H*ubitainer on the sampler and continue to draw a sample.

    $n completion of bunkering, mix together the samples from both containers to

    ensure you

    have a good, representative sample from the bunkering operation.

    N always ensure that the sampler valve is fully open to allow the sampler to drain

    N always close the sampler valve before blowing through the fuel lines on

    completion

    of bunkering

    N close the sampler valve if pumping stops, to prevent the sample being drawn

    back,

    under vacuum, into the fuel line

    4elect three or four clean sample bottles. 0he exact number depends on the final

    destination

    of the various samples. 0o cover all eventualities, it is recommended that four 

    representative

    samples are obtained from the delivery. 0he list shows the samples that are

    re?uired.

    0he distribution of the samples beingE

    N supplier@s sample Hfrom their P$ connection

    N ship@s sample for retention on board

    N onboard analysis sample

    N sample for independent analysis

    29

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    42/113

    0he full *ontainer should be placed in the pourer box and thoroughly shaken to

    ensure that the contents are well mixed. &ttach the pourer spout and gradually

    transfer the

    contents into the sample bottles, filling each a little at a time. If more than one

    *ubitainer 

    was used during bunkering, then transfer a portion into each of the bottles.

    *omplete

    the document labels and attach one to each sample bottle.

     &lways have the barge operator to witness the removal and sealing of the sample

    bottleHs

    Hshown below. If this re?uest is refused, or if no witness is provided, then note this

    in the

    delivery log.

    @.@.@ 

    M#:P5" #nne& ;I samples

    It is now a re?uirement that a sample is taken for P$ &nnex 'I purposes.

    0he sample has to be specifically for the purpose of meeting the P$

    regulations.

    It must be stored securely and retained onboard for at least twelve months.

    0he sample should be taken at the ship@s inlet manifold and the sample bottle must

    be properly sealed on completion.

    5etails of the sample bottle serial number must be added to the bunker delivery

    note and entered into the oil record book or log book.

    0here should be documentation onboard your ship giving the full re?uirements of 

    these regulations.

    @.@.* Samples for #nalysis

    any ship operators make use of a specialist fuel analysis service to get

    detailed information on the ?uality of the fuel delivered.

    2;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    43/113

    0he major classification societies offer this service and usually supply the

    containers, labels and instructions for taking and forwarding the samples. 0he

    analysis report covers the fuel properties and contaminant content. It also gives

    advice on storage and handling and predictions on the effect of using the fuel.

    It is also good practice to carry out onboard testing of the fuel as a check on

    the accuracy of the shoreside analysis report.

    @[email protected] 5n'oar$ testing

    $nboard testing is not meant to give accurate results but should give a rough

    indication for the main parameter values of the fuel. 0ypically, onboard testing is

    carried out using simple test e?uipment.0he parameters that are usually tested are

    shown in the list.

    0he results from these tests will give an early indication if using the fuel is likely to

    cause any operational problems. 0ake the opportunity to do these tests using the

    fuel onboard your vessel so that you become more familiar with them.

    5ensityE using hydrometer 

    'iscosityE using simple viscosimeter 

     &brasive contentE using a pair of glases slides

    *ompatibilityE using spot test

    >ater contentE using water detector paste.

    Figure / Density Measurement Instrumentation

    (

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    44/113

     

    5ensity measurement Hseagull 2hen heavy fuel oil is bunkered it is stored in the shipSs bunker tanks. 0hese

    tanks are of varying shapes, siAes and capacities depending on the ship siAe,

    construction and trade.

    uel oil is transferred from storage tanks to settling tanks via a fuel oil

    transfer pump and its associated suction strainer. rom the settling tanks it is

    transferred to service tanks by way of the purification system. 0wo fuel oil

    centrifugal separators are installed with appropriate supply pumps, heaters and

    controls. 0he system and e?uipment is configured to permit operation of the

    separators in parallel or in series, either in a purifierDpurifier, clarifierDclarifier or 

    purifierDclarifier se?uence. *entrifuge heater crossover capability is also illustrated.

    uel oil is discharged from the centrifugal separators to the service tanks either 

    directly, or via an additional duplex filter if it is suspected that the separators have

    not removed all contaminants. 0he fuel oil is retained in the service tanks until it is

    (6

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    45/113

    drawn to the main engine via the fuel oil service system. 0race heating of the fuel

    oil piping, if fitted, should be activated during these transfer operations.

    @.*./ Different Fuel !ypes =an$ling

    0he different grade re?uirements will dictate the storage arrangements onboard the

    vessel. It is recommended that fuels from different sources, particularly residual

    fuels, should not be mixed in storage. In other words, new bunkers should not be

    loaded into a tank containing any of the previous bunkers. 0he purpose of this

    recommendation is to minimise the risk of fuel compatibility problems which may

    result in the formation of sludge and heavy deposits either in storage tanks or in

    treatment e?uipment.

    ixtures of residual fuels can become unstable even if the original fuels were

    stable, so mixing should be avoided whenever possible, as was stated in an earlier 

    chapter.

    In practice, this is not usually possible, since fuel tanks are not normally completely

    empty unless they have been manually cleaned. 0hey should, however, only

    contain the minimum ?uantity of old bunkers before filling with the new batch.

    (2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    46/113

    @.*.3 =eating

     &II fuel oil bunker tanks and waste oil tanks must have some form of tank heating.

    %ormally the heating is by way of steam produced by an oil:fired boiler and passed

    through coils inside the oil tank. $ther ways to heat the fuel tanks are by using

    thermal oil. 0his also utilises an oil fired boiler that heats the thermal oil which is

    then circulated through coils inside the tank by a pump. 0emperature regulation

    and monitoring can be automatic and self:adjusting but is commonly effected by

    checking the tank temperature and manually adjusting the heating accordingly.

    +eating coil integrity in the case of using steam as the heating should be monitored

    by checking the steam condensate returns in the engine room observation tank. If 

    oil is observed, the source must be traced. &n increase in steam consumption

    should be checked out as this may indicate a steam coil failure. In the case of 

    thermal oil heating, oil analysis should be regularly taken and results checked for 

    any +$ contamination. onitoring of the thermal oil header tank leve I should

    also be strictly monitored. $nboard viscosity checks may be useful in determining

    any thermal oil viscosity change caused by +$ contamination.

    ((

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    47/113

    @.*.@ 9unBer !anBs

    0he bunkering capacity of ships varies from ship to ship. In fact not even sister 

    ships may have the same bunker tank capacity as a result of small design changes

    and tank fabrication discrepancies during building.

    0he maximum allowable filling capacity of a bunker tank varies from one company

    to another and should be documented in the companySs safety management

    system. %ormally, the maximum is in the range of 93 to ;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    48/113

    rom a safety standpoint, fuel oils must never be heated in shipsS bunker tanks at

    or above the fuelSs flash:point. 0he tanks should be insulated where possible to

    reduce heat loss. It is important to shut off the settling tank heat source once its

    contents are up to temperature, because continuous heating will produce thermal

    currents within the tank which interfere with the settling process. 4hips have high

    tank temperature alarms and may also have automatic regulators.

    ecause of constant heat loss from a settling tank, it may be necessary to

    reactivate the tank heating system periodically to maintain its contents at 8ater and sludge should be removed on a regular basis by mean s of these drains

    as part of a normal watchkeeping routine. 5uring periods of heavy weather it is

    necessary to drain fuel storage tanks more regularly than usual. 4hipsS engines

    have stopped when this has not been carried out in rough weather.

     

    @.*.- Service tanBs

    4ervice tanks, or day tanks, have a very important function in the overall treatment

    of heavy fuel oil for diesel engines. 0hey provide a final settling function for water 

    and solids, a heating function and a thermal stabilising function. 0he settling

    function is primarily a backup in the event of a failure of the separators andDor 

    during a by:pass of the filtration system, should this emergency be necessary. It

    should be noted that damage to engine fuel injection e?uipment and the engine

    may occur if this is carried out. $n some ships, one +$ service tank is fitted. 0his

    obviously makes the changeover to low sulphur fuel oil a much more time

    consuming procedure, as the service tank high sulphur fuel has to be consumed

    before low sulphur fuel is introduced. $n most modern ships, however, two service

    tanks are provided. 0his follows 4$&4 re?uirements for redundancy of fuel oil

    service tanks, which apply to ships built on or after 6 Uuly 6;;9. H4ee 4$&4 2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    49/113

    operation for engines andDor boilers. uel changeover procedures are discussed

    below. 0he service tanks normally have high and low suction lines with downturned

    suction diffuser elbows. 0he cleanest fuel oil is available from the upper Hhigh

    suction. 0herefore it should be used whenever possible. 0he service tanks should

    have bottom drain connections for water and sludge stripping. 0he water and

    sludge from this bottom drain should be removed at regular intervals as part of the

    engine room watchkeeping procedures. & typical heavy fuel oil service tank system

    is shown below.

    @.*.1 Mayor Fuel Storage Pro'lems

    0o have a deeper understanding of the mayor problems we can have onboard in

    this section we are going to make a little explanation about them so we can advise

    then and avoid any problem with the system or the engines.

     

    )ludge,

    4ludge is a contaminant that results from the handling, mixing, blending,

    and pumping of heavy fuel while stored at, and after it leaves, the refinery.

    4torage tanks, heavy fuel pipe lines, and barging can all contribute to the

    build:up of sludge. >ater contamination of a high asphaltene fuel oil canproduce an emulsion during fuel handling which can contain more than 3hereas cleaning strainers is not a difficult task, the

    (8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    50/113

    fre?uency of cleaning and the need for round:the:clock attention generally

    create problems with the allocation of manpower. & centrifuge normally is

    ineffective in removing oil soaked fibres because they have the same

    density as the oil being purified. +ence, downstream manual or auto:

    strainers and fine filters can be expected to clog ?uickly, and continue to

    clog fre?uently until the entire amount of a fibre contaminated fuel has been

    consumed or removed.

     

    #idation products

    0his form of contamination is the result of the marine residual fuel ageing,

    either before or after it is bunkered. #esidual fuels are not stable for long

    periods at elevated storage temperatures. 0he time from the refinery to use

    onboard ideally should be less than three months. It is anticipated that future

    residual fuels resulting from more intense secondary processing will be even

    less stable. +eated heavy fuels, stored in uncoated steel tanks and exposed

    to air Hoxygen will oxidise and polymerise with time. 0he resultant sludges,

    gums and resins will initially form in solution and then collect and settle or 

    adhere to the tankSs surfaces. &lso, as heavy fuels age, their shipboard

    conditioning and treatment become more difficult. In the extreme, the dieselengineSs combustion process can deteriorate, causing increased fouling

    deposits and corrosion, as a result of burning such partially oxidised older 

    fuel oils. Generally, residual fuel oils should not be bunkered or utilised as

    ballast, trim, or held in reserve for extended periods. 0he oldest on spec fuel

    on the ship should be burned first to prevent any heavy fuel oil from ageing

    beyond three months from its bunkering date.

      Micro0ial contamination,

    icrobial contamination usually occurs with jacket water systems, diesel

    fuels and lubricating oils onboard ship. +owever, there have been instances

    where +$ and I$ have been contaminated.

    (7

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    51/113

    icrobial contamination of diesel fuel oil has unfortunately become a

    common occurrence.

    icrobes are microscopic, living organisms, and include bacteria, fungi and

    yeast, all of which can cause problems in the fuel system.

    acteria, normally the main source of problems, can be either aerobic types,

    which need oxygen to survive, or anaerobic types, which do not need

    oxygen.

    >hen bacteria are present in water contaminated diesel fuel, colonies can

    form as slimy masses at the interface between the settled water and the

    fuel.

     &s the colonies break up they can be carried through the fuel system

    causing severe filter blockages.

     &erobic bacteria usually initiate the problem but, as the oxygen supply

    reduces, anaerobic bacteria can appear with the colonies growing rapidly.

    In many cases the fuel delivered to the vessel will consist of a number of 

    different components from the refinery process which have been mixed

    together in order to meet the specification given in the fuel standard.

    +eavy fuel oil, with either viscosity or density values outside of the limits of 

    the fuel standard, may have distillate fuel mixed with it to try and improve its

    condition.

    If the mixture is not stable then the two components will separate out during

    storage leaving the heavy fuel component in the lower part of the tank and

    the distillate above it.

    $bviously the high values of density and viscosity may cause problems

    when transferring or pre:treating the fuel before final use.

    1ou can reduce the risk of this occurring by ensuring that the fuel storage

    temperature is not excessive as this may accelerate any separation.

     

    Dirt(

    (9

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    52/113

    uel oil can be contaminated from a number of sources, these include the

    raw crude oil, the refining process and the transportation and storage stages

    of supply. 4ome of the contaminants are solid material including sand, soil,

    rust and other debris. >ater, either salt or fresh, is also often present in the

    fuel.

    5uring storage some of the water and dirt will settle out and collect in the

    bottom of the tank. 0his has to be removed, either by draining or manual

    cleaning, so that it doesn@t carry over into the fuel systems. It also means

    that there has to be suitable filters and pre:treatment facilities onboard to

    remove any remaining water and dirt which has not settled.

     

    Incompati'ility(

    Incompatibility is the term used to describe a situation when two different

    batches of fuel, each of which is normally stable, react when mixed together,

    resulting in heavy sludge deposits in either the storage tanks or in the pre:

    treatment e?uipment.

    0he result of this condition can be that the fuel becomes unusable and the

    vessels operation is seriously affected.4evere sludge accumulation in the fuel treatment e?uipment, resulting in

    more fre?uent cleaning, can mean that the treatment rate cannot keep up

    with consumption re?uirements.

    It should be standard practice when bunkering a new batch of fuel that it is

    only loaded into empty or nearly empty tanks.

    ixing with previous bunkers should be avoided whenever possible.

     

    *.*., Fuel Processing

    0he shipownerSs first point of active fuel control and handling begins at the shipSs

    bunkering connection. 0he movement, storage, inventory and final processing of 

    the fuel is the responsibility of the shipSs operating personnel. Pre:planned and

    careful execution of fuel oil management within the shipSs transfer and processing

    (;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    53/113

    systems will minimise the potential for creating fuel compatibility and combustion

    problems.

    • Fuel transfer 

    uel oil is transferred from storage tanks to settling tanks via a fuel oil

    transfer pump and its associated suction strainer. & transfer pump normally

    is installed to move fuel oil from storage tanks to settling tanks. $ne positive

    displacement transfer pump, protected by suction strainers and a pressure

    relief valve, and a pump bypass line, is normally fitted. 0he transfer pump

    flow rate depends on engine fuel consumption rate and service and settling

    tank siAe.

    Proper arrangement of system valves adds distribution flexibility to the

    transfer system. 0hese valves normally permit fuel oil from any storage tank

    to be pumped to either settling tank, to either service tank, to the remainder 

    of the fuel oil storage tanks or, in some systems, overboard to a barge or 

    other storage facility via the bunkering manifold.

    Internal fuel oil transfers must always be recorded in the $#. 0he internal

    transfer of fuel oil onboard ship must be treated with the same precautions

    as during bunkering.

     

    Settling tanBs to service tanBs(

    0he transfer of fuel oil from the settling tank to the service tank is normally

    carried out by using the onboard +$ purifiers. 4ome ships have the facility

    to use oil in the engines and boilers directly from the settling tank, thus by:

    passing the fuel oil purifiers. 0his by:pass system is for emergency use only

    and should be strictly avoided, where practicable, at all other times. 4erious

    engine damage may occur if this by:pass system is used for any length

    oftime.

    )

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    54/113

     

    F.5 5verflow an$ "eaBs

     &s we know most of ships fuel arrangement is provided with a overflow tank

    were is coming the overflow from all .$ tanks doesnCt matter the type of 

    fuel containing. if good transfer procedures for topping up tanks are

    followed usually is not filled by means of overflowing. ost of the time is

    filled slowly from the .$ leak lines, from main engines and auxiliary engines

    also is fill by the back flush filter or any auto filtration system to avoid lost of 

    fuel so as we can see these fuel is reach in impurities and mixtures of fuels

    of different types. >hen re?uired these fuel most be transfer and apropiate

    handling of it must be done usually is recommended to be send back to the

    settling tanks but experiences dealing with these type of fuel have shownthis can led to heavy sludgeCs so as recommendation big ?uantities

    transfers from these tank must be avoided at the same time.

    @.-. F.5 !reatment

    In the previous chapters we have concentrated on the storage of fuel onboard and

    the procedures and systems in place to achieve this safely with a minimum risk.

    0he condition of the fuel is, however, unfit for use without further cleaning and pre:

    treatment. In this chapter we will look at the way in which we can prepare the fuel

    ready for use in a diesel engine fuel system.

    0he extent of the treatment really depends on the grade of fuel that we are

    operating withB distillate fuels re?uire far less treatment than residual fuels.

    *.-./ Separating forces in the settling tanB>e have already said that the settling tank relies on a difference in density for 

    separation to occur due to the effect of gravity. +owever, this is not the whole story.

     &ll matter is affected by gravity. &n object will fall to the earth due to gravitational

    force acting on it which is determined by the object@s mass and the acceleration

    due to gravity.

    )6

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    55/113

    0he air resistance results in a drag force which acts to slow down the rate of fall.

    0he difference between the two forces determines the speed at which the object

    will fall.

    4imilarly, in the settling tank, and ignoring buoyancy forces, the water droplets and

    dirt particles are subject to a Mfalling@ force and the fuel oil provides the drag force.

    0he siAe of the drag force is determined by the viscosity and density of the fuel and

    the surface area of the particle.

     &t increased temperature, the density and viscosity of the fuel oil decreases, and

    therefore, the drag force reduces.

    *.-.3 Suction strainers

    0he settling tank low suction connection will be used for normal operation

    If there is a build up of dirt in the bottom of the tank, or, if vessel movement in

    rough weather is likely to disturb the settled dirt and water, then the high suction

    can be used.

    0his will reduce the amount of dirt and water drawn from the tank by the pump.

     & suction strainer is fitted between the tank outlet valves and the pump inlet to

    protect the pump from damage by the larger particles of dirt.

    0he suction strainer usually has a coarse mesh to help ensure an acceptable flow

    to the pumpB only relatively large particles of dirt are removed at this stage.

    urther cleaning of the fuel is necessary before it can be transferred to the service

    tank for use in a diesel engine fuel system.

    0his can be achieved dynamically using centrifuges or by using a static filter 

    module.

    oth of these devices are usually self cleaning.

    1ou will probably have one or other of these fitted on your current vessel.

    *.-.@ %leaning 'y centrifuge

    >e have seen that a settling tank relies on a difference in density to separate

    different li?uids and solids.

    )2

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    56/113

    0his is a slow process due to the fact that there is not much difference in the

    densities of fuel and water, and so the separating forces are relatively small.

    0o speed up the process the separating forces need to be increased and this is the

    purpose of the centrifuge.

    0he centrifuge usually consists of a gear driven bowl contained within a casing

    provided with suitable inlet and outlet passages.

    0he high speed rotation of the centrifuge bowl generates forces many times

    greater than gravitational force due to the centrifugal effect.

    0his increases the separating force between the different components of the

    mixture passing through the bowl.

    0he heavy components of the dirty fuel mixture, usually solids and water, move to

    the outer part of the centrifuge bowl.

     & compact stack of conical discs are used to assist the separating process.

    0he centrifuge can be set up to allow discharge of water and dirt or to collect dirt in

    the outer part of the bowl.

    ost centrifuges are designed as self cleaning units and have an automatic, timed,

    sludging facility.

     &ll ships designed to operate on heavy fuel oils will have centrifugal separators

    Hpurifiers as part of the engine room e?uipment. It should always be remembered

    that purifiers have their limitations and we cannot expect a ship@s fuel oil treatment

    processing plant to render every fuel oil fit for use. +owever effective design and

    maintenance will almost certainly provide ade?uate protection against the

    potentially harmful effects of the vast majority of fuel oils delivered. >ater and

    sediment levels in the fuel can be effectively controlled in well maintained and

    correctly operated purifiers. $n the flip side, poorly maintained and operated

    purifiers will fail to improve fuel oils to an acceptable ?uality and result in undue

    wear or damage to the engine

    )(

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    57/113

    0he centrifugal separator is the foundation of the total shipboard fuel treatment

    system.

    Its operation must be thoroughly understood by the shipboard engineers so that

    they can immediately troubleshoot heavy fuel oil problems as they occur. &

    treatment problem cannot wait until the next port. ajor main engine damage can

    rapidly result from lack of effective fuel oil purification.

    0he following actions are necessary to ensure a proper cleaning of the +$E

    N 4election and operation of the fuel oil centrifuges

    N according to suppliers recommendation

    N *orrect +$ temperature at inlet to the centrifuges

    N *orrect throughput of fuel through the centrifuges

    N Proper density of +$ in conformance with the centrifuge specification

    N Proper maintenance of the centrifuges. If properly operated, a centrifuge

    has a removing efficiency of close to 6

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    58/113

    0he importance of adjusting the throughput if the temperature is changed is

    illustrated in ig. 6, which shows an example of the relationship between

    temperature and

    throughput. or example, a centrifuge operating with an inlet temperature of ;

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    59/113

    • !he purifier(

    >hen a centrifuge is set up to continuously discharge water it is referred to as a

    purifier.5irty oil enters the bowl through a central tube and passes down to the

    distribution plate at the bottom and then upwards through the disc stack.

    0he forces, generated by the high speed of rotation, cause the water and dirt,

    which are heavier than the oil, to move to the outer part of the disc stack and bowl.

    0he water and dirt gather in a region between the wall of the bowl and just inside

    the edge of the disc stack.

    0he clean oil gathers in the region from the centre of the bowl to just inside the

    edge of the disc stack.

    0he point where the separated oil and water meet is referred to as the interface

    0he position of the interface is controlled by using gravity discs with different siAe

    central holes or gravity plugs of different length.

    0hese determine the effective position of the water outlet.

    0he clean oil passes up the outside of the central tube to the outlet to the service

    tank.

    0he water flows over the disc stack cover plate to the edge of the gravity disc, or 

    plug, and out through the water outlet.

     

    !he clarifier(>hen a centrifuge is set up without a continuous water discharge it is referred to

    as a clarifier.

    0he general operating principles are the same as for a purifier except that the

    water outlet is blanked off by the top cover of the disc stack.

    Instead of separating water and solids from the dirty oil, a clarifier separates solids

    from a li?uid mixture

    0he solids build up on the inner wall of the bowl and have to be removed regularly.

     &s already stated this is achieved through an automatic sludging cycle

     

    %om'inations(

    0he factors which affect the performance of the centrifuge are the density

    difference, the speed of rotation and the time that the mixture is in the bowl.

    )8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    60/113

    >e usually operate with temperatures as high as possible, but below the boiling

    point of water, to maximise the density difference.

    >here the capacity of the centrifuges is much greater than the consumption rate of 

    the machinery then a low flow rate can be used to increase time in the bowl.

    0his also allows us to use two centrifuges in series, one as a purifier and one as a

    clarifier, which increases the cleaning effect.

    0his is the preferred arrangement where possible.

    >here capacities of the centrifuges are not much greater than the consumption

    rate of the machinery it is possible to use them as purifiers operating in parallel.

    0his allows us to have a reduced flow rate through each centrifuge but still

    maintain an overall throughput greater than the consumption rate.

    Purifier particle removal is important for the removal of catalytic fines from +$.

    Purifier manufacturers have performed various tests on particle siAe and purifier 

    throughput to determine the effects this has on particle removal. elow is a table

    showing some interesting results.

    !a'le , Purifier Particle :emoval Efficiency

    4iAe range of particles

    Hmicrons 3:8 8:9 9:6<

    Particles in feed oil to

    Purifier. 6,8

  • 8/18/2019 Fuel Quality Control on MT ILMA and Cap Felix

    61/113

    the purifierDclarifier in series method when the machines use the gravity disc

    method. 0he purifier removes water and some particles and the clarifier removes

    even more particles, therefore lowering the fuel oil@s particle count. >ith modern

    systems only one machine is re?uired.

    4ome basic situations which can cause separators to operate below maximum

    efficiency, or not work at all, areE

    a. incorrect fuel handling before the centrifuge

    '. unstable flow

    c. incorrect flow, usually too high a flow

    $. unstable temperature

    e. incorrect temperature

    f. incorrect positioning of the waterDoil interface, inhibiting the correct

    flow of oil through all discs, usually caused by incorrect gravity data

    andDor choice of an incorrect gravity disc.

    g. overfilling of sludge space caused by extended intervals between de:

    sludging, or incompatible heavy fuel oils with higher than normal

    sludge deposits.

    #eferring to the diagram below, the following observations show inefficient or 

    incorrect separator operation which may be caused by changes in the fuel oil

    characteristics.

    a separator which breaks the water seal after experiencing

    balanced operation may be the result of increased fuel density,

    increased viscosity, increased flow rate, or a decrease in

    temperature

    if the oi'water interface moves towards the axis of the bowl to

    give poor fuel separation or water carry over into