Fsapm Assignment

download Fsapm Assignment

of 19

Transcript of Fsapm Assignment

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    1/19

    1

    FSAPM ASSIGNMENTANALYSIS REPORT ON JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD.

    ANKITA DAS(FINANCE-A)

    3/3/2011

    SUBMITTED TO

    DR. P. JANAKI RAMADDU

    REGN. NO.10SBCM0376

    ALLIANCE BUSINESS SCHOOL

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    2/19

    2

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    Apart from my own effort, the success of this project depends largely on the

    encouragement and guidelines of my Professor. I take this opportunity to express

    my gratitude to the people who have been instrumental in the successful

    completion of this report.

    I would like to show my greatest appreciation to DR. P.JANAKI RAMADDU. I cant

    say thank you enough for his tremendous support and help. I feel motivated and

    encouraged every time I attend his session. Without his encouragement and

    guidance this project would not have materialized.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    3/19

    3

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    1. COMPANYS PROFILE2. BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF MANAGEMENT3. COMPANYS OVERVIEW4. ANALYSIS OF ANNUAL REPORT ON THE

    BASIS OF:

    y DEPRECIATION

    y INVENTORY VALUATIONy FOREIGN EXCHANGE

    y DEFERRED TAX

    5. Z-SCORE RATIO ANALYSIS6. REFERENCES

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    4/19

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    5/19

    5

    BRIEF INTRODUCTION OF MANAGEMENT:

    The management team consists of individuals who have significant experience in

    the Indian stainless steel industry. Most of the senior management team have

    over two decades of experience in their respective industries and have beeninstrumental in JSLs growth. Its management team has the industry knowledge

    and skill necessary to provide strategic leadership and direction to explore new

    emerging opportunities in the stainless steel sector, improve its current

    operations and successfully implement and operate JSLs Orissa Project. JSLs

    management team provides the company with a significant competitive edge.

    Chairperson: Savitri Jindal

    She became non-executive chair of the Jindal Organisation on her late husband O.P. Jindals death in ahelicopter crash in 2005. Today she is the richest women in

    India and worlds fourth richest motherwith a net worth of $12.2 billion.

    Vice Chairman & Managing Director: Ratan Jindal

    He is a commerce graduate and has studied Management from Wharton Business

    School, U.S.A. He has been Director of Nalwa Sons Investments Ltd (formerly

    Jindal Strips Ltd) from 1979 to 2005. Also he is a Member of Board of the

    International Stainless Steel Forum, Chairman of the Economics & Statistics

    Committee of ISSF and member of the prestigious US-based Young Presidents

    Organization

    Directors:

    Naveen Jindal

    He is a management graduate from University of Texas, Dallas. At a very young

    age, Mr. Naveen Jindal has transformed JSPL (as an Executive Vice Chairman &Managing Director), a moderately performing company in the steel sector, into a

    world class company, the highest wealth creator in the country. Also he is a

    Member of Parliament since 2004 representing the Kurukshetra constituency in

    the state of Haryana.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    6/19

    6

    Suman Jyoti Khaitan

    He is an Advocate and the founder of Khaitan & Partners, Advocates & Notaries, a

    multi-practice law firm and has more than 20 years experience in the legal field.

    T S Bhattacharya

    He is M. Sc. in Nuclear Physics; Post M.Sc. from Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics;

    and PGDBM in Management Science from Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of

    Management, Mumbai. He is also an Associate of Indian Institute of Bankers and

    possesses 38 years of rich banking experience.

    James Alistair Kirkland Cochrane

    He is MBA from Strathclyde Graduate Business School UK. Since 2006, he hasbeen the president of International Chromium Development Association.

    Jurgen Hermann Fechter

    He is qualified chartered accountant in South Africa. Member of executive board

    of VDEH Steel Institute and a member of the board of directors of ISSF.

    Director Finance: Arvind Parakh

    He is a Chartered Accountant and has 28 years of work experience in corporate

    finance and business management. Associated with JSL Stainless for 11 years.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    7/19

    7

    COMPANYS OVERVIEW:

    JSL Stainless (JSLS) is India's largest SS (stainless steel) manufacturer in terms of

    production volume and net sales with total installed capacity of 0.72 mtpa (100%

    capacity utilisation) having manufacturing facilities at three locations - Hisar,Vizag and Orissa.

    It has 40% share in domestic SS market (more than 70% market share in

    organized SS sector) and manufactures different ranges of flat steel products

    serving domestic as well as international markets.

    Investment Rationale

    Largest Organised SS Player in India: JSLS is well poised to be the top cost

    competitive SS producer in India. It has around 40% share in domestic SS market

    & for high end applications the market share is about 75%. High level of

    integration from mining to manufacturing with captive thermal power, flexibility

    to produce all grades, service all major markets and ability to produce specialty

    products such as precision strips, coin blanks. Hence JSLS is rightly positioned to

    en-cash on expanding domestic high growth stainless steel market.

    Robust SS Industry Growth in India: In year 2009 the global stainless steel

    production was 24.6 mtpa which is expected to grow by 15% to around 28.5 mtpa

    in year 2010. In first half of year 2010 crude SS production has reached 15.5

    million tons. The growth of Indian stainless steel industry is driven mainly by

    increase in per capita income, infrastructure / end use industry growth, higher

    Indian GDP and new application development. The consumption pattern of

    stainless steel will see drastic change and sectors like transportation, tubes, and

    construction to boost demand in coming years.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    8/19

    8

    Proactive Debt Restructuring: JSLS approached CDR to ensure long term viability

    and use available cash for its expansion projects. The company can also

    competently raise more cash/debt for its expansion plans. JSLS has successfully

    managed to reduce around 1% in senior & subordinate debt and also interest of `

    839 crore on loan of above `3000 crore is converted as term loan for which the

    repayment to start after 1st April, 2012. Further, JSLS targeting to reduce its

    interest from 9.5% to around 8.5% by March 2011.

    Fully Integrated Capacity Addition: Worlds largest integrated SS greenfield

    project of one mtpa in Orissa Phase II will lead JSLS to 13th

    place in world for SS

    production. New fully integrated capacity will benefit JSLS to reduce its

    dependence on raw materials, increased product range and also spend lower on

    logistic costs being closer to port. Besides the mining linkages, the companywould also benefit from assured supply of key inputs. Commissioning of new 500

    MW captive power plant would further reduce the manufacturing costand will

    help improve margins going ahead.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    9/19

    9

    ANALYSIS OF ANNUAL REPORT ON THE BASIS OF:

    DEPRECIATION

    INVENTORY VALUATION

    FOREIGN EXCHANGE

    DEFERRED TAX

    EXPLANATION :

    DEPRECIATION:

    According to AS-6, Depreciationis a measure of the wearing out, consumption or

    other loss of value of a depreciable asset arising from use, effluxion of time or

    obsolescence through technology & market changes.

    Depreciation is allocated so as to charge a fair proportion of the depreciable

    amount in each accounting period during the expected useful life of the

    asset. Depreciation includes amortisation of assets whose useful life is

    predetermined.

    PURPOSE OF DEPRECIATION:

    1. Depreciation has a significant effect in determining and presenting the

    financial position and results of operations of an enterprise. Depreciation is

    charged in each accounting period by reference to the extent of the

    depreciable amount, irrespective of an increase in the market value of the

    assets.

    2. Historical cost of a depreciable asset represents its money outlay or its

    equivalent in connection with its acquisition, installation and

    commissioning as well as for additions to or improvement thereof. The

    historical cost of a depreciable asset may undergo subsequent changes

    arising as a result of increase or decrease in long term liability on account

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    10/19

    10

    exchange fluctuations, price adjustments, changes in duties or similar

    factors.

    3. The method of depreciation is applied consistently to provide

    comparability of the results of the operations of the enterprise from period

    to period.

    ANALYSIS OF JINDALS DEPRECIATION EFFECT:

    Depreciation on fixed assets is provided on straight-line method (SLM) at the

    rates and in the manner specified in Schedule XIV to the Companies Act, 1956.

    Leasehold Land and Aircraft are being amortised over the period of lease. In the

    case of assets where impairment loss is recognised, the revised carrying amount is

    depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset.

    Certain Plant and Machinery have been considered as continuous process planton the basis of technical assessment and depreciation on the same is provided for

    accordingly. Intangible Assets are amortised over the expected duration of

    benefits not exceeding ten years.

    EXPLANATION:

    There is no change in depreciation method adopted by the company & it has

    remain consistent with straight line method since years. Depreciation during the

    year includes Rs. 5.48 crs (previous year Rs. 1.28 cr) transferred to pre-operative

    expenses.

    y Assets taken on lease like Land & Aircraft are amortised by Rs. 1.80 crs &

    Rs. 16.26 crs over the period of lease.

    y In Jindal, carrying cost of assets is exceeding its recoverable amount , for

    which they implemented revised carrying cost which depreciated over

    remaining economic life of assets.

    y Depciation of Rs. 444.60 crs is charged on continous process from plant &

    machinery.

    y Intangible assets i.e. software licences ,are amortised for Rs. 1.34 crs.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    11/19

    11

    INVENTORY VALUATION:

    According to AS-2, Valuation of inventory are assets:

    (a) held for sale in the ordinary course of business;

    (b) in the process of production for such sale; or

    (c) in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in theproduction process or in the rendering of services.

    Inventories encompass goods purchased and held for resale, for example,

    merchandise purchased by a retailer and held for resale, computer software

    held for resale, or land and other property held for resale. Inventories also

    encompass finished goods produced, or work in progress being produced, by

    the enterprise and include materials, maintenance supplies, consumables

    and loose tools awaiting use in the production process. Inventories do not

    include machinery spares which can be used only in connection with an itemof fixed asset and whose use is expected to be irregular; such machinery

    spares are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Standard (AS) 10,

    Accounting for Fixed Assets.

    METHODS:

    1. Standard : Under the Standard costing method approach, both inventory

    and the cost of goods sold are based on the standard fixed cost assigned to

    the items within the item manager at the time of reporting.2. First-in, First-out (FIFO) : Under FIFO, the cost of goods sold is based upon

    the cost of material bought earliest in the period, while the cost of

    inventory is based upon the cost of material bought later in the year. This

    results in inventory being valued close to current replacement cost. During

    periods of inflation, the use of FIFO will result in the lowest estimate of cost

    of goods sold among the three approaches, and the highest net income.

    3. Last-in, First-out (LIFO) : Under LIFO, the cost of goods sold is based upon

    the cost of material bought towards the end of the period, resulting in costs

    that closely approximate current costs. The inventory, however, is valuedon the basis of the cost of materials bought earlier in the year. During

    periods of inflation, the use of LIFO will result in the highest estimate of

    cost of goods sold among the three approaches, and the lowest net

    income.

    4. Weighted Average : Under the weighted average approach, both inventory

    and the cost of goods sold are based upon the average cost of all units

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    12/19

    12

    currently in stock at the time of reporting. When inventory turns over

    rapidly this approach will more closely resemble FIFO than LIFO.

    5. Average : Under the average approach, both inventory and the cost of

    goods sold are based upon the average cost of all units received in stock.

    PURPOSE:

    A primary issue in accounting for inventories is the determination of the

    value at which inventories are carried in the financial statements until the

    related revenues are recognised. This Standard deals with the determination

    of such value, including the ascertainment of cost of inventories and any

    write-down thereof to net realisable value.

    ANALYSIS OF JINDALS VALUATION OF INVENTORIES:

    Raw Materials and Stores & Spares are valued at lower of cost, computed on

    weighted average basis, and net realizable value. Cost includes the purchase price

    as well as incidental expenses. Scrap is valued at estimated realisable value.

    Work-in-progress is valued at lower of estimated cost and net realisable value and

    finished goods are valued at lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost for this

    purpose includes direct cost and appropriate administrative and other overheads.

    EXPLANATION:

    For the valuation of Inventory company has used weighted average method & net

    realizable value method.The profit of the company has went up due to sales & the

    company has valued its inventory at lower cost.

    INVENTORY CONTRIBUTION

    2010 % 2009 %

    STORES &

    SPARES 347.28 26.14076 281.08 23.23052

    RAW MAT. 300.6 22.62702 297.19 24.56197FINISHED

    GOODS 560.43 42.18517 570.32 47.13544

    WIP 119.72 9.011667 61.37 5.072068

    SCRAP 0.47 0.035378 0 0

    TOTAL 1328.5 100 1209.96 100

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    13/19

    13

    If we see the above table then we can see that company is converting its raw-

    material into finished goods fastly, which shows better position of the company,

    as finished goods is approx 42 % out of total inventory, but previous year it was

    47% , which shows that companys spares ,WIP & Scraps proportion has

    increased, which should be controlled.

    FOREIGN EXCHANGE:

    According to AS-11, Foreign exchange is the exchange of one currency for

    another, or theconversion of one currency into another currency. Foreign

    exchange also refers to the global market where currencies are traded virtually

    around-the-clock. The term foreign exchange is usually abbreviated as "forex" and

    occasionally as "FX."

    PURPOSE:

    An enterprise may carry on activities involving foreign exchange in two

    ways. It may have transactions in foreign currencies or it may have foreign

    operations. In order to include foreign currency transactions and foreign

    operations in the financial statements of an enterprise, transactions must

    be expressed in the enterprises reporting currency and the financial

    statements of foreign operations must be translated into the enterprises

    reporting currency.

    The principal issues in accounting for foreign currency transactions andforeign operations are to decide which exchange rate to use and how to

    recognise in the financial statements the financial effect of changes in

    exchange rates.

    ANALYSIS OF JINDALS FOREIGN EXCHANGE EFFECT:

    Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the rate of exchange prevailing at

    the date of the transaction. Monetary foreign currency assets and liabilities are

    translated at the year-end exchange rates and resultant gains / losses arerecognised in the profit & loss account for the year, except to the extent that they

    relate to new projects till the date of capitalisation which are carried to pre-

    operative expenses and those relating to fixed assets which are adjusted to

    the carrying cost of the respective assets.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    14/19

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    15/19

    15

    Difference originated in one period which is capable of reversal

    in one or more subsequent periods

    PURPOSE:

    As per AS-22, a company is liable to provide for deferred tax liability on the first

    day it accounts for such income. The basic premise being that revenues and

    expenses of an accounting period should meet matching principle and disparity in

    computing income for tax and book purposes should be appropriately resolved.

    Differences between the two sets of computation of income can be classified into

    two categories; permanent and timing differences. Permanent differences arise

    with respect to expenditure legitimately incurred but are wholly or partiallydisallowed for tax purposes.

    Such expenses do not give rise to deferred tax provision. Temporary differences

    are those that arise due to timing reasons. A typical example is provision for

    depreciation with varying rates for book purposes and tax purposes. Rates

    prescribed for company law are minimum rates, taking into consideration useful

    life of the asset.

    ANALYSIS OF JINDALS DEFERRED TAX:

    In accordance with Accounting Standard (AS-22) Accounting for Taxes on

    Income issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, deferred taxes

    resulting from timing differences between book and tax profits are accounted for

    at the tax rate substantively enacted by the Balance Sheet date to the extent the

    timing differences are expected to be crystallised. Deferred tax assets are

    recognised to the extent there is reasonable/virtual certainty of realising such

    assets against future taxable income.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    16/19

    16

    EXPLANATION:

    DEFERRED TAX VALUATION

    2009 2010

    A.DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

    Disallowance u/s 43-B of the Income tax act, 1961 -78.07 -87.01Prov. For doubtful debts -1.79 -1.52

    TOTAL DEFERRED TAX

    ASSETS -79.86 -88.53

    B.DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

    Diff. between book & tax

    dep. 678.6 802.5

    Misc. exp. Written off 1.03 1.03

    TOTAL DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES 679.63 803.53

    NET DEFERRED

    TAX 599.77 715

    y The Net Deferred tax liability for the current year is less when compared to

    the previous year. In the current year, net deferred tax liability is Rs. 803.53

    crs whereas in the previous year it was Rs. 679.63 crs. Deferred tax liability

    refers to future tax obligation those results from the origination of a

    temporary difference that causes pre-tax book income to exceed taxable

    income.

    y Deferred tax liabilities arise where tax relief is provided in advance of an

    accounting expense, or income is accrued but not taxed until received.

    y It means that the company has earned money and recorded a tax expense

    on the income statement, but has not yet paid the cash tax

    y Deferred tax assets can arise due to net loss carryovers, which are only

    recorded as assets if it is deemed more likely than not that the asset will be

    used in future fiscal periods. Here deferred tax assets are increasing from

    previous period which shows the company can use its assets in coming

    fiscal year.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    17/19

    17

    Z- SCORE ANALYSIS OF TITAN INDUSTRIES AND JINDAL STEEL &

    POWER LTD.

    DEFINATION OF Z-SCORE: A company failure or bankruptcy prediction method

    developed by Professor Edward Altman of New York University. A company's Zscore is a positive function of five factors:

    (net working capital) / (total assets) ,(retained earnings) / (total assets) ,(EBIT) /

    (total assets), (market value of common and preferred) / (book value of debt)

    ,(sales) / (total assets).

    Although the weights are not equal, the higher each ratio, the higher the Z score

    and the lower the probability of bankruptcy. Also called Zeta.

    The original Z-score formula was as follows: Z = 0.012T1 + 0.014T2 + 0.033T3 +

    0.006T4 + 0.999T5.

    T1 = Working Capital / Total Assets. Measures liquid assets in relation to the size

    of the company.

    T2 = Retained Earnings / Total Assets. Measures profitability that reflects the

    company's age and earning power.

    T3 = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes / Total Assets. Measures operating

    efficiency apart from tax and leveraging factors. It recognizes operating earnings

    as being important to long-term viability.T4 = Market Value of Equity / Book Value of Total Liabilities. Adds market

    dimension that can show up security price fluctuation as a possible red flag.

    T5 = Sales/ Total Assets. Standard measure for sales turnover (varies greatly from

    industry to industry).

    Altman found that the ratio profile for the bankrupt group fell at -0.25 avg, and

    for the non-bankrupt group at +4.48 avg.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    18/19

    18

    ALTMAN'S Z-SCORE RATIO

    ANALYSIS

    RATIO FORMULA WEIGHT FACTOR

    WEIGHTED

    RATIO

    1.RETURN ON ASSETS EBIT/T.A. X.3.3 (4)-0.8

    2.SALES TO TOTAL ASSETS SALES/T.A. X.0.999 (4)-0.8

    3.EQUITY TO DEBT

    M.V. OF

    EQUITY/T.L. X.0.6 (4)-0.8

    4.WORKING CAPITAL TO TOTAL

    ASSETS WORKING CAPITAL/T.A. X.1.2 (4)-0.8

    5.RETAINED EARNINGS

    RETAINED

    EARNINGS/T.A. X.1.4 (4)-0.8

    KEY FACTORS:

    y Z-score above 2.99--you're in good shape

    y Z-score between 2.99 AND 1.81--warning signs

    y Z-score below 1.81--big trouble--could be heading toward bankruptcy

    Z.SCORE ANALYSIS FOR TITAN & JINDAL

    RATIO TITAN JINDAL

    1.RETURN ON ASSETS 1.42 0.6

    2.SALES TO TOTAL ASSETS 5.82 0.48

    3.EQUITY TO DEBT 0.05 3.6^-03

    4.WORKING CAPITAL TO TOTAL

    ASSETS 1.33 0.12

    5.RETAINED EARNINGS 1.18 0.61

    Ifwe compare & analyse the above table then we can see that TITAN financial

    position is better than JINDAL. For JINDAL, its a red alert as there is a high

    chance ofbeing bankrupt than TITAN.

  • 8/6/2019 Fsapm Assignment

    19/19

    19

    REFERENCES:

    y JINDAL POWER & STEEL LTD. ANNUAL REPORT

    y CAPITAL-LINE

    y TITAN INDUSTRIES LTD. ANNUAL REPORT