The Bureaucracy AP U.S. Government and Politics. Line at the DMV Getting things done!
From Movement to Government (DONE)
Transcript of From Movement to Government (DONE)
-
8/12/2019 From Movement to Government (DONE)
1/1
january 4, 2014
Economic & PoliticalWeekly EPW JANUARY 4, 2014 vol xliX no 1 7
From Movement to Government
Running the Delhi government will test the Aam Aadmi Partys ability to transform itself.
The Aam Aadmi Partys (AAP) decision to form a government
with the support of the very party it has been bitterly
opposed to since its inception was not surprising. Ideally
the party, which made a spectacular debut in the assembly elec-
tions just a few months after deciding to enter the fray, would have
preferred to consolidate its support base by being in the opposition.
The party sought to overcome this dilemma by engaging in an
informal referendum, asking its supporters through telephone
calls, text, emails and, most importantly, through ward meet-
ings on whether it should form the government. The overwhelm-
ing response in favour of assuming office forced theAAPshand.
The inability of the single largest party, the Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP), to form the government without horse-trading and
the prompt support provided by the Congress left it with little
choice. Moreover, had theAAPrefused to form a government it
would have disappointed a large section of the urban poor whoseem to have voted for the party based on its promises to reduce
the cost of essential services.
TheAAP sentry as a political force in the historically bipolar
political system in Delhi has put the BJPand the Congress in an
uncomfortable bind. The BJP refused to form a government,
despite being short by only four seats, knowing that any
manoeuvre to garner support by luring legislators from other
parties would have backfired on the party in the coming gener-
al elections. The AAP s strident use of the anti-corruption
plank prevented the BJPfrom indulging in horse-trading.
For the AAP too, there would have been no guarantee of
renewed support, especially from the poor, if the party had refused
to form a government and looked at a re-poll coinciding with
the Lok Sabha elections. From theAAP sperspective then, as a
party that has relied on an agenda that is not drawn from partic-
ularisms (caste, religion or region) to garner support, meeting
expectations through governance becomes vitally important.
TheAAP srise and the manner in which it has achieved power
(even if in a small, symbolically important, state) has had few
precedents in Indias democracy. It managed to bring together
a cross-section of Delhis population and successfully converted
a single-point mass movement into a political party with
diverse support. Its support base has included members ofthe upper-middle and middle classes who have bought into the
anti-corruption message and have interpreted it as governance
delinked from inefficiency and malfeasance. The urban poor
especially those living in slum clusters extended support on the
promises to ensure the supply of 700 litres of free water for house-
holds, to reduce power tariffs by 50% after a thorough audit of the
electricity supplying companies, and to regularise the illegal
and unauthorised residential areas, including slum clusters.
WhetherAAPmanages to grow out of Delhi into a national
political force depends, to a large extent, on how it performs in
Delhi. Its rise has been helped by some fortuitous factors like
the relatively less importance for caste in urban Delhi, its large
migrant population and the saturation coverage of its activities
by the media. Delhis compact geographical space also helped.
Such advantages will be lacking in other states. The AAPhas
also resisted the adoption of ideological positions and has
chosen not to present a clear vision of the society it wants to
build. It has focused instead on offering proximate and prag-matic solutions to widely felt problems. This has worked well in
its short rise, as it has allowed its largely left-of-centre leaders
and mass base to take along a large section of the right-of-cen-
tre middle class. It appears that the AAPleadership expects to
sustain their cross-class support base by staying away from clearly
enunciated economic policies and foregrounding the fight
against corruption and inflation. There is, however, no guaran-
tee that this tightrope walk can be sustained for long; after all
the definition of corruption itself is different for those who live
in fancy south Delhi and those who live in that citys slums.
In terms of the political positions the AAP has taken, the
partys rhetoric has itself showed a slow but clear shift to the
left-of-centre position. This will, if it continues on this path,
make it a replacement for the Congress, much of whose mass
base and populist imagery the AAP is adopting. If the AAP
is to succeed in this, it will be forced to stand increasingly
in stark opposition to the right-wing BJP. For both replacing the
Congress as well as providing an alternative to the BJP, theAAP
will need to articulate clearer political positions and take
ideological stands. Its willingness, and ability, to do so will
perhaps decide whether it will grow to be a national force. Not
doing so may have been a strength but may soon turn into a
liability. However, theAAPhas surprised most political observerswith its success against all predictions of failure; perhaps it
will do so again.