From Movement to Government (DONE)

download From Movement to Government (DONE)

of 1

Transcript of From Movement to Government (DONE)

  • 8/12/2019 From Movement to Government (DONE)

    1/1

    january 4, 2014

    Economic & PoliticalWeekly EPW JANUARY 4, 2014 vol xliX no 1 7

    From Movement to Government

    Running the Delhi government will test the Aam Aadmi Partys ability to transform itself.

    The Aam Aadmi Partys (AAP) decision to form a government

    with the support of the very party it has been bitterly

    opposed to since its inception was not surprising. Ideally

    the party, which made a spectacular debut in the assembly elec-

    tions just a few months after deciding to enter the fray, would have

    preferred to consolidate its support base by being in the opposition.

    The party sought to overcome this dilemma by engaging in an

    informal referendum, asking its supporters through telephone

    calls, text, emails and, most importantly, through ward meet-

    ings on whether it should form the government. The overwhelm-

    ing response in favour of assuming office forced theAAPshand.

    The inability of the single largest party, the Bharatiya Janata

    Party (BJP), to form the government without horse-trading and

    the prompt support provided by the Congress left it with little

    choice. Moreover, had theAAPrefused to form a government it

    would have disappointed a large section of the urban poor whoseem to have voted for the party based on its promises to reduce

    the cost of essential services.

    TheAAP sentry as a political force in the historically bipolar

    political system in Delhi has put the BJPand the Congress in an

    uncomfortable bind. The BJP refused to form a government,

    despite being short by only four seats, knowing that any

    manoeuvre to garner support by luring legislators from other

    parties would have backfired on the party in the coming gener-

    al elections. The AAP s strident use of the anti-corruption

    plank prevented the BJPfrom indulging in horse-trading.

    For the AAP too, there would have been no guarantee of

    renewed support, especially from the poor, if the party had refused

    to form a government and looked at a re-poll coinciding with

    the Lok Sabha elections. From theAAP sperspective then, as a

    party that has relied on an agenda that is not drawn from partic-

    ularisms (caste, religion or region) to garner support, meeting

    expectations through governance becomes vitally important.

    TheAAP srise and the manner in which it has achieved power

    (even if in a small, symbolically important, state) has had few

    precedents in Indias democracy. It managed to bring together

    a cross-section of Delhis population and successfully converted

    a single-point mass movement into a political party with

    diverse support. Its support base has included members ofthe upper-middle and middle classes who have bought into the

    anti-corruption message and have interpreted it as governance

    delinked from inefficiency and malfeasance. The urban poor

    especially those living in slum clusters extended support on the

    promises to ensure the supply of 700 litres of free water for house-

    holds, to reduce power tariffs by 50% after a thorough audit of the

    electricity supplying companies, and to regularise the illegal

    and unauthorised residential areas, including slum clusters.

    WhetherAAPmanages to grow out of Delhi into a national

    political force depends, to a large extent, on how it performs in

    Delhi. Its rise has been helped by some fortuitous factors like

    the relatively less importance for caste in urban Delhi, its large

    migrant population and the saturation coverage of its activities

    by the media. Delhis compact geographical space also helped.

    Such advantages will be lacking in other states. The AAPhas

    also resisted the adoption of ideological positions and has

    chosen not to present a clear vision of the society it wants to

    build. It has focused instead on offering proximate and prag-matic solutions to widely felt problems. This has worked well in

    its short rise, as it has allowed its largely left-of-centre leaders

    and mass base to take along a large section of the right-of-cen-

    tre middle class. It appears that the AAPleadership expects to

    sustain their cross-class support base by staying away from clearly

    enunciated economic policies and foregrounding the fight

    against corruption and inflation. There is, however, no guaran-

    tee that this tightrope walk can be sustained for long; after all

    the definition of corruption itself is different for those who live

    in fancy south Delhi and those who live in that citys slums.

    In terms of the political positions the AAP has taken, the

    partys rhetoric has itself showed a slow but clear shift to the

    left-of-centre position. This will, if it continues on this path,

    make it a replacement for the Congress, much of whose mass

    base and populist imagery the AAP is adopting. If the AAP

    is to succeed in this, it will be forced to stand increasingly

    in stark opposition to the right-wing BJP. For both replacing the

    Congress as well as providing an alternative to the BJP, theAAP

    will need to articulate clearer political positions and take

    ideological stands. Its willingness, and ability, to do so will

    perhaps decide whether it will grow to be a national force. Not

    doing so may have been a strength but may soon turn into a

    liability. However, theAAPhas surprised most political observerswith its success against all predictions of failure; perhaps it

    will do so again.