from Josephson effects to quantum computing by Pascal Febvre … · 2018. 11. 21. · • Basic...
Transcript of from Josephson effects to quantum computing by Pascal Febvre … · 2018. 11. 21. · • Basic...
from Josephson effects to quantum computing
by Pascal Febvre and Paul Seidel
1
2
Outline
• Basic principles for superconducting electronics
• The Josephson junction
• The SQUID (Superconducting QUantum Interference Device)
• Digital electronics based on Josephson junctions1. The superconducting latching logic of the 80’s2. The Rapid-Single-Flux-Quantum (RSFQ) logic
• Introduction to comparators
• Analog-to-digital conversion with Josephson junctions1. hysteretic junctions2. non-hysteretic junctions
• The DC-to-SFQ interface as a comparator
• The Quasi-One-Junction SQUID comparator
• The balanced comparator
• Applications of RSFQ logic
3
Vector potential & electrical potential
with time-dependent Schrödinger equation, lead to :
where is the quantum of magnetic flux
B & E uniques though the number of couples (A,U) is infinite(depends on the chosen gauge)
Lagrange function
Hamilton function ( ) [ ]21
, , ( , ) ( , )2
H r p t p q A r t q U r tm
= - +
Maxwell equations + &
F0=
h
2e
4
Relation between magnetic flux & phase (1/2)
Case of normal metals:
metal iinduit
=1
R
¶f(t)¶t B
iinduced
Faraday's law:
5
Relation between magnetic flux & phase (2/2)
: London penetration depth
B
superconductor
Phase – flux relationAharonov-Bohm effect
0
2( ) ( ) length dll dl l
pj j+ - = F
FFlux quantization F
loop= nF
0
Meissner currents
(diamagnetism) l
L
j(l + dl)
j(l + dl)
j(l)
j(l)
G
6
Phases, flux and inductances
j(l + dl) - j(l)=2p
F0
Fdl
j (l + dl) j (l)
dl
F
dl= L
dlI
(1) j (l + dl) j (l)
dl
(2)
I1
I2
+F
1+ F
2
-F
1- F
2
-F
1+ F
2I1 + I2
Dj (dl)
-F1
+ F2
= 2np
® L1
I1
= L2
I2
if no flux in the loop ; samecurrent distribution as with
R
1I
1= R
2I
2
7
The Josephson junction
IJ = Ic sinj(t)Josephson equations:
DC Josephson effect at V = 0 :
IJ 0 = Ic sinj0
2000 Å
2000 Å
~10 Å
superconductor 1
superconductor 2
insulating barrier
: phase difference between the two wavefunctionsy i =y i0eiji (t )
JJCJ
I(t)
V(t)
¶j(t)¶t
=2pF
0
V(t)
ac Josephson effect at V0 = cste :
IJ
= Icsin
2p
F0
V0t
æ
èç
ö
ø÷ = I
csin 2p f
Jt( )
with fJ = 484 GHz/mV (Josephson relation)
j =j1 -j2
8
Josephson junction: equivalent to the transistor for semiconductor electronics
3 µm
Materials commonly used: Nb/Al-AlOx/Nb @4.2 K
THIRD WORKSHOP ON SPECTRUM MONITORING OF SPACE SIGNALS - Institut AéroSpatial - Toulouse - 25-26 September 2014
The Josephson junction
I-V characteristic of a Josephson junction
Ic
Vg
RN
for niobium:Vg ~ 2.85 mV and fg ~ 680 GHz
quasi-particle branchJosephson branch
SS I
V=0
« normal » branch
VJUNCTION
IJUNCTION
S
S I
V=Vg
eVg = 2D
10
The superconducting latching logic of the 80's
Ijunction
Vjunction
Ic
Vg
RN
Absence of resistance of superconductors combined with characteristic frequencies of a few hundreds GHz
• development of a static logic in the eighties (IBM ; MITI)• based on hysteretic Josephson junctions
Outcome:
• clock frequencies of a few GHz limited by the punch-through effect
• with the drawback of cryogenic cooling
• period of intense research & development still used today
End of the eighties: Konstantin K. Likharev & his team (Moscow State University)proposed a superconducting logic based on quanta of magnetic flux :
a dynamic logic which relies on the use of shunted Josephson junctions
state “ 0 ” state “ 1 ”
11
Josephson junction electrodynamics
IJ (t) = Ic sinj(t)
IC (t) = CJ
¶V (t)
¶t
IR (t)=V (t)
R/ /
I(t) = IC (t)+ IJ (t)+ IR (t)
IJUNCTION
VJUNCTION
IC
RN
V (t)=F0
2p
¶j(t)
¶t2nd Josephson equation (Faraday's law):
V (t) =F0
2p
1
Ic cosj(t)
¶IJ (t)
¶t
é
ëê
ù
ûú= LJ
¶IJ (t)
¶t
LJ =LJ0
cosj(t)with LJ0
=F0
2p Ic
Josephson inductance
JJ = non-linear parallel RLC circuit
Vg
12
Characteristic time constants & frequencies
Physical approach(BCS theory)
t c =2F0
p 2 Vg
t p =2p F0CS
jC
t RC =p Vg CS
4 jC
Nb: 0.15 psNbN: 0.07 ps
R-C circuit time constant : tRC = R/ / CJ
L-R circuit time constant : t c =LJ 0
R/ /
Plasma periodof the L-C circuit :
t p =2p LJ 0CJ
Electricalapproach
I(t)
Ic
= LJ0CJ
¶2j(t)
¶t 2+
LJ0
R/ /
¶j(t)
¶t+sinj(t)
Anharmonic oscillator
13
I(t)
Ic
= LJ0CJ
¶2j(t)
¶t 2+
LJ0
R/ /
¶j(t)
¶t+j(t)
For damped oscillatory regimes, transients evolve as: e
-t
2 R// CJ =e-
t
2t RC
Linearized approach
Damping coefficient: x =1
2R/ /
LJ0
CJ
Quality factor: Q=1
2x= R/ /
CJ
LJ0
If j t( ) <<1
Example:SIS junction used in radio-astronomy:RN=12 ohms ; CJ = 190 fF ; Ic = 200 µA
t LR = 0.13pst p = 3.5 pst RC = 2.3ps
Josephson junction dynamics
-0,5
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
0 5 10 15 20
Time (ps)
JJ
vo
lta
ge (
mV
)
Ifinal = 300 µA
Ifinal = 50 µA0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6voltage (mV)
cu
rren
t (µ
A)
6 t RC
Criteria : fmax =1
12 t RC
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 10 20 30 40 50
current density (kA/cm2)
freq
uen
cy
(G
Hz)
Limitations of the static logic
Reduce the switching timeReduce the R-C time constant
Reduce R
15
R-C circuit time constant
tRC = R/ / CJ
L-R circuit time constant
tLR
=L
J 0
R/ /
L-C circuit plasma period
t p =2p LJ 0CJ
McCumber parameter defined by:
bc
=t
RC
tLR
=R
/ /
2 CJ
LJ
0
=2p R
/ /
2 CJ
Ic
F0
R/ / » Rshunt
Minimum switching time obtained for :
tRC
= tLR
=t
p
2p
æ
èç
ö
ø÷ : b
c= 1
New time constant
t 0 =F0 CS
2p jc
=F0
2p Rshunt Ic
t 0 ps( )»1
p Vc mV( )with Vc = Rshunt Ic
Minimising the switching time
fmax(GHz) = 500 x Vc(mV)
Criteria: fmax = 1/(2πτ0)
16
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 10 20 30 40 50
current density (kA/cm2)
Ma
xim
um
freq
uen
cy
of
op
erati
on
(G
Hz)
Maximum frequency of operation
Valid for externally-shunted SIS junctions
Nb
NbN
17
Ijunction
Vjunction
c >> 1
Vg
Rshunt
c > 1
VcJunctions NbN/MgO/NbN - CEA-INAC Grenoble
c = 1
Vc
c < 1
Vc
c 1: fmax
but the hysteresis disappears:no more switching between 2 states
Influence of the McCumber parameter
18
I-V characteristics of Josephson junctions
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
0 5 10 15 20time (ps)
Jose
phso
n ju
nctio
n vo
ltage
(m
V)Junction parameters: RN=12 ; CJ = 190 fF ; Ic = 200 µA
shunted junction such that c =10 = 0.56 ps
unshunted Josephson junction
c= 0.13 ps - p=3.5 ps - RC=2.3 ps - c =17
I = CJ
¶V (t)
¶t+
1
Rshunt
V (t)+ Ic sinj(t)
A B
V (t)dtA
B
ò =F0
Dj =2p
Josephson junction dynamics
area=0
area =2 mV.ps
20
h/2e
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
time (ps)
Voltage n
orm
alized t
o V
c
Dynamics of shunted Josephson junctions
This dynamic logic is called Rapid Single Flux Quantum (RSFQ)
Magnetic flux quantum: h/2e = 2.07 mV.ps = 2.07 mA.pH
I=1.2 Ic
I=3 Ic
I=5 Ic
21
On-chip RSFQ clock
Technological status
Source: ITRS 2004
How to manage single pulses?
Rshunt
Vc
IbiasIsignal
voltage
current
time
critical current Ic
Kirchhoff's laws:
Iapplied = IL + IJNodal rule:
Loop rule: Vi
loop
å =0
Integration over a loop:
Vi
loop
åæ
èç
ö
ø÷ dtò = 0dtò =constant , " time interval
Vi dtòloop
å =F0
2pDji
loop
å = constant = nF0
Modified Kirchhoff's law (law of phases): Dji
loop
å =2np
Processing magnetic flux quanta
25
2p LIapplied
F0
=2p LIL
F0
+2p LIc
F0
sinj
DC-SFQ converteror
ac SQUID (e.g. rf SQUID)or
Schmidt trigger
jL =2p
F0
FLjext =2p
F0
L Iapplied
jext
= 2 np +j + l sinj
l =2p L I
c
F0
2 * maximum number of flux quanta storablebefore JJ switching
Processing flux quanta - static analysis (1/2)
Iapplied = IL + IC sinjNodal rule :
jL -j =2npLoop rule :
jext
= jL
+ l sinj
26
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5
j/2p
jex
t/2p
l =2p L IC
F0
£1 1£l =2p L IC
F0
£4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5
j/2p
jex
t /2p
1st fluxon
2nd fluxon
1st antifluxon
2nd antifluxon
Processing flux quanta - static analysis (2/2)
27
Generation of quantized pulses (1/2)
1£l =2p L IC
F0
£4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5
j/2p
jex
t /2p
jext
1st fluxon( ) = arccos -1l
æ
èçö
ø÷+ l2 -1The first fluxon enters the loop for:
1st fluxon
jext
2nd fluxon( ) =jext
1st fluxon( ) + 2pThe second fluxon enters the loop for:
2nd fluxon
The first antifluxon enters the loop for:
jext
1st antifluxon( ) = 2p - arccos -1l
æ
èçö
ø÷- l2 -1
1st antifluxon
jext
2nd antifluxon( ) =jext
1st antifluxon( ) - 2p
The second antifluxon enters the loop for:
2nd antifluxon
28
A
Iext
IC
pointA( ) =1
larccos -
1
l
æ
èçö
ø÷+ l2 -1
é
ëê
ù
ûú
1£l =2p L IC
F0
£4.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5
j/2p
jex
t /2p
1st fluxon
2nd fluxon
1st antifluxon
2nd antifluxon
Generation of quantized pulses (2/2)
Iext
IC
point B( ) =Iext
IC
point A( ) +2p
l
B
29
Iapplie
d
Iapplied
stored flux
Quantized pulses of area h/2e =2.07 10-15 Wb = 2.07 mV.ps = 2.07 mA.pH
Picosecond pulse and magnetic flux quantum
30
Simulation of a pulse generator
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
50 100 150 200 250
time (ps)
curr
ent
(mA)
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
voltage (
mV)
applied current junction current junction voltage
supercurrent in the loopof the DC-SFQ converter
quantized area pulse = 2.07 mV.ps = 2.07 mA.pH = 2.07 10-15 Wb
31
Pulse transmission
L .Ic < Φ0
Pulse storage
L .Ic > Φ0
The digital signal is coded with 2 states, between two clock pulses : ‘0’ : no pulse ‘1’ : one quantized pulse (SFQ pulse)
Example of SFQ gate: the Delay-Flip-Flop (DFF)
34
Drawing for the NbN/MgO/NbN technology- CEA INAC - Grenoble
Schematics of the Delay-Flip-Flop cellFLUXONICS Cell Library
www.FLUXONICS.eu
35
Layout for the Nb/Al-AlOx/Nb technology – FLUXONICS Foundry – IPHT Jena - Germany
Layout of the Delay-Flip-Flop cellFLUXONICS Cell Library
33 µm
J1 J2
J3
J4
J5
J6
J7
www.FLUXONICS.eu
36
Simulation of the Delay-Flip-Flop cellFLUXONICS Cell Library
www.FLUXONICS.eu
37
Margins of the Delay-Flip-Flop cellFLUXONICS Cell Library
www.FLUXONICS.eu
38
Yield of the Delay-Flip-Flop cellFLUXONICS Cell Library
www.FLUXONICS.eu
39
RSFQ process cross-sectionFLUXONICS Foundry
40
RSFQ technology parameters and tolerancesFLUXONICS Foundry
FLUXONICS octagonal Josephson junctions
d Josephson junctionspecific capacitance :50±2 fF/µm2
41
RSFQ technology parameters and tolerancesFLUXONICS Foundry
✦ Current density of 1 kA/cm² based on Nb/Al-AlOx/Nb tri-layers
✦ 3 metal layers M0, M1 & M2 : 1st for ground plane and 2nd/3rd
for wiring
✦ Characteristic voltage Vc=256 µV
✦ McCumber parameter βc = 1
✦ 13 shunted octagonal Josephson junctions for digital operation
Junction Lb100 Lb125 Lb150 Lb175 Lb200 Lb225 Lb250 Lb275 Lb300 Lb325 Lb350 Lb375 Lb400
Ic (µA) 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400
area (µm2)
9.94 12.44 15.11 17.59 20.09 22.54 25.13 27.59 29.99 32.47 35.03 37.42 40.18
d (µm) 3.4 3.8 4.3 4.7 4.9 5.2 5.5 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.5 6.8 7.0
Rshunt (Ω) 2.58 2.06 1.69 1.46 1.27 1.14 1.02 0.93 0.85 0.79 0.73 0.68 0.64
42
RSFQ technology parameters and tolerancesFLUXONICS Foundry
www.FLUXONICS.eu
43
The Toggle Flip-Flop cell
The Toggle FlipFlop (TFF) celldelivers an SFQoutput pulseonce every twoSFQ pulses sentto its input.
For an SFQ clocksignal at a givenfrequency, theoutput pulsetrain is an SFQclock at half-frequency.
www.FLUXONICS.eu
The Toggle Flip-Flop cell
www.FLUXONICS.eu
The FLUXONICS Toggle Flip-Flop cellmargins and yield
www.FLUXONICS.eu
Picture of Toggle Flip-FLop cell
www.FLUXONICS.euJ1
25 µm Cell size : 200 x 300 µm
Toggle Flip-FLop experimental results
www.FLUXONICS.eu
FLUXONICS cell library
DCSFQ JTL SPLITTER MERGER-1 MERGER-2
TFF SFQDCBUFFERJTL DFFC
TFFC-A TFFC-B NDRO
www.FLUXONICS.eu
Experimentally-verifiedfrequency limit
The physics of the Josephson junction gives
easy access to the frequency of oscillations
Performances & applications of RSFQ logic
Applications:Telecommunication domain:
• analog-to-digital converters• routers• base-station of mobile phones
Security & intelligence:• analog-to-digital converters• super-computers • software-defined radio - SDR
Science:• super-computers• astronomy: signal processing of imagers• geophysics: study of Earthquakes, geophysical prospection• (bio)-medical: encephalo- & cardio- magnetography• archeology
Performances:• clock frequencies in the 30-110 GHz range (state-of-the-art)• ultimate clock frequencies up to 770 GHz : demonstrated on simple circuit• clock frequency objective for the next decade: 160-300 GHz• very low consumption with new eSFQ and eRSFQ concepts
51
Analog-to-Digital Converters
1 cm2 chip, fabricated with HYPRES’ standard Nb process with Jc = 4.5 kA/cm2.
It contains :- a bandpass delta-sigma ADC,- a digital channelizer,- output drivers.
5000 - 10 000 Josephson junctions.
Courtesy of Deep Gupta - HYPRES
RSFQ half-precision floating-point adder (FPA) successfully demonstrated at 20 GHz.
Circuit size is 5.9 mm × 5.7 mm.
10224 Josephson junctions.
Performance is 1.67 GFLOPS.
Total power consumption is 3.5 mW.
Courtesy of Noboyuki Yoshikawa - University of Yokohama - Japan
Floating-point units (Japan)
Superconducting digital electronicsintegrated systems
Courtesy of Deep Gupta - HYPRES
Complete cryocooled digital-RF receiver system prototype, assembled in a standard 1.8-meter tall 0.5-meter wide equipment rack.
Using the modular packaging approach, the system can currently host variety of chips.
The system includes a two-stage 4-K Gifford-McMahon cryocooler manufactured by Sumitomo, two sets of interface amplifiers for connecting chip outputs to an FPGA board (placed behind the vacuum enclosure, on the metal tray) for further digital processing and computer interface. The system also includes a current source and a temperature controller.
• Semiconductor technology: comparators based on operational ampshave specifications that depend weakly on environment
An introduction to comparators
+
-
Vin Vref
Vout
• Superconductor technology: comparators are based on Josephsonjunctions whose high non-linearity involves a design that is fullyenvironment-dependent
55
When Josephson junctions are shunted to be non-hysteretic and faster, digitalinformation is stored in the magnetic flux quantum and requires asuperconducting loop to be generated.
• Digital signal is based on two states, for a given time interval: ‘0’ : no pulse ‘1’ : one SFQ pulse
• Much faster than switching logic if shunt resistance is correctly chosen
Rshunt
c ≈ 1
Vc
Ibias
Isignal
voltage
current
time
Analog-to-digital conversion with Josephson junctions
56
The DC-to-SFQ interface used as a comparator
• The Josephson junction switches forspecific values of Iext;
• It can be used to know Iext at theswitching instants;
• If the temporal form of Iext iscomplex, the pulses are not equallyspaced in time and the post-processing of digital data iscomplex.
• A pulse added to the signal to sense, and chosen to force triggeringof the Josephson junction at a regular rate, transforms the DC-to-SFQ converter into a comparator.
• Then the generated pulse needs to be measured and processed.
57
The DC-to-SFQ interface used as a comparator
58
The DC-to-SFQ interface used as a QOJ comparator
• The second junction is chosento have a critical currentmuch higher that the one ofthe comparator junction
• The device is a quasi-one-junction SQUID (QOJS): Ko &Van Duzer, 1988
• It is biased so thatP(switching) = 50% inabsence of signal
• Ko & Van Duzer, 1988
• Networks of such QOJS madefor flash ADCs
• 6-bit ADC demonstrated (4 bits at 5 GHz and 3 bits at 10 GHz) : Bradley (1993)
59
The DC-to-SFQ interface used as a QOJ comparator
• 6-bit ADC demonstrated (4 bits at 5 GHz and 3 bits at 10 GHz) :Bradley (1993)
60
The SQUID comparator
Kratz & Jutzi, 1985
signal
pulsetrigger
61
The balanced comparator
Filippov & Kornev, 1991
DI =¶P
¶I I =0
-1
current
time
threshold
signal
62
Parameters influencing the comparator resolution
ΔI depends on:- noise in the system (<-- temperature)- trigerring pulse shape: time rise,…(<-- frequency of operation)- JJ parameters (capacitance, McCumber parameter)- loop inductances (and stray inductances)- bias current- environment impedance in a wide frequency range
63
The balanced comparator resolution
α is the switching rate
DI µ Ic
1/3IT
2/3 ln aRN IcT
a
æ
èçö
ø÷
-1/3
64
The balanced comparator resolution
Filippov et al, 1995Oelze et al, 1997
65
The balanced comparator resolution
Oelze et al, 1997 66
The current knowledge on balanced comparators
• The influence of noise, shape of triggering pulse and speed is fully understood, even versus the input signal inductance
• The jitter of the device can be derived from this analysis
• Experiments and theory are in very good agreement regarding noise considerations (no extra noise needs to be added)
• The influence of the sensing impedance (in particular inductance) and of other parasitic elements in the sensing loop is still not totally sorted out (Gordeeva & Pankratov, JAP2008)
67
Sources of knowledge about Superconducting Electronics
Websites
The European Superconductivity News Forum (ESNF):http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum
http:// www.quantarctic.eu (under construction)
http:// www.fluxonics.eu (under reconstruction)
Books
A. Barone, G. Paterno ́, Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect, John Wiley & Sons, 1982. ISBN: 0-471-01469-9.
T. Van Duzer, C.W. Turner, Principes of Superconductive Devices and Circuits, second ed., Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998. ISBN: 0-13-262742-6.
K.K. Likharev, Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits, Gordon and Breach Publ., New York, 1986.
The SQUID Handbook, by John Clarke and Alex Braginski
Michael Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, second ed., Dover Books on Physics, 2004. ISBN: 0-486-43503-2 Paperback. 68
Sources of knowledge about Superconducting Electronics
69
Sources of knowledge about SQUIDs
The SQUID Handbook, by John Clarke and Alex Braginski-------The European Superconductivity News Forum (ESNF):http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum
Volume 1 - Issue 1 - July 2007: High-Performance dc SQUID Sensors and Electronics by D. Drung et alhttp://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/Drung_ESNF_PTB_Magnicon_final_0626071.pdf
Volume 2 - Issue 6 - October 2008: section about SQUIDs, SQUIFs and related -http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/Contents06.html
Volume 3 - Issue 8 - April 2009: Recent SQUID Activities in Europe, Part I: Devices by A. I. Braginski & G. B. Donaldson -http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/CR-12.pdf
Volume 3 - Issue 9 - July 2009: Recent SQUID Activities in Europe, Part II: Applications by A. I. Braginski & G. B. Donaldson -http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/CR12-II_Final_073009.pdf
Volume 4 - Issue 12 - April 2010: Simplified Analysis of Direct SQUID Readout Schemes by D. Drunghttp://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/MT-21_ST188.pdf
Volume 5 - Issue 15 - Jan. 2011: SQUIFs, Bi-SQUIDs & R-SQUIDs - http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/Contents15.html
Volume 5 - Issue 18 - Oct. 2011: dc SQUID & SQIF Sensor with High Transfer Function Based on Sub-micrometer Cross-type Josephson Tunnel Junctions by T. Schönau et al - http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/KRYO-Schonau.pdf
Volume 6 - Issue 19 - Jan. 2012: SQUID-based Systems for Co-registration of Ultra-Low Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Images and Magnetoencephalography by A. Matlashov - http://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/ST289.pdf
Volume 6 - Issue 20 - April 2012: SQUIDs: Then and Now by John Clarkehttp://www.ewh.ieee.org/tc/csc/europe/newsforum/pdf/issue20-Clarke.pdf-------Superconductor Science and Technology - Volume 22 - no. 6 - June 2009 - Special section: focus on nanosquids and their applications -http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-2048/22/6
70
Thank you for your attention !
phase Flux jump
x
time
Fontaine de Vaucluse - France - March 9, 2013
Cooper pair
71