From Chapter 9 of Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

9
From Chapter 9 of Saunders and Miodownik’s CALPHAD book Computational methods

description

From Chapter 9 of Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods. for many years: equil const used to express (the abundance of certain species) in terms of the amounts of other arbitrarily chosen species for one rxn → one equil const needed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of From Chapter 9 of Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

Page 1: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

From Chapter 9 of Saunders and Miodownik’s CALPHAD book

Computational methods

Page 2: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

• for many years: equil const used to express (the abundance of certain

species) in terms of the amounts of other arbitrarily chosen species

for one rxn → one equil const needed the # of rxn ↑ → many equil const needed but not

available

∴ CALPHAD (CALculation of PHAse Diagram) method: considering the G energy of all phases → true equil calculation by of

mii

ii GNGGNG or )(

component

phase

→ then, the # of unknowns considerably reduced in comparison to equil const approach

Page 3: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

• in the case of binary and ternary phase equil

→ analytic method is possible to calculate certain 2-phase equil

ex) binary eutectic, negligible solubility in the terminal solid phase, ideal mixing in the liq, equil btw liq and a(A) :

Fig. 9.1. Simple eutectic system with ideal mixing in the liquid and negl solid solubility in the terminal solid phases, and .

Fig. 9.2. G/x diagram at 850K for eutectic system in Fig. 9.1.

Page 4: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

A

lA GG no solubility

lA

lA

lA

lAliq

lA

lA

lA

lA

lA

lA

SSHH

T

STHTSH

GGor

from

this is a special case

not a good method

0

function T from calculated finally exp

ln

solu) ideal assuming(lnln

A

lA

lA

A

lA

lA

lA

lA

lA

lA

lA

x

xRTG

x

GxRT

xRTGaRTGG

)( liq is st standard if lGthenG lAA

Page 5: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

• general method: equil btw a solu phase & stoichiometric

according to Hillert,

0 GGxGl

ii

0

GGxG

GxGxGand

GGhere

lii

liiii

lii

BA GGG or

how to calculate T ?

general solution : liq, liquidus of Φ (MTDATA used this methodology)

Newton-Raphson method:

for fixed xiΦ → first choosing arbitrary T

→ iteratively stepping T until ΔG below

a small, defined accuracy limit

Page 6: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

• a more general case of both phases with a solubility range

as xiΦ is not fixed, by fixing T and then finding x and xliq

from xo (To), however, it is converted to N in this section)}()({ xGxGT lo

liq

x xlxo

MNNN

eqbalancemassgeneral

GNG

ii

m

and

w.r.t. onminimizati

liq

xi

the alloy first assumed in single-phase → an arbitrary amount of liq introduced → min G reached → fixing liq comp and changing → min G reached again → final minimization of G

if the alloy chosen outside 2-phase equil (xi) →

xiliq calculated to minimize G of +l → by fixing

xiliq and changing the amount of → G ↓ → finally

reaching equil btw and liq

Page 7: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

• multi-component sys

calculation must be defined: # of degree of fredom reduced G of the sys calculated some iterative tech to minimize G how to reduce f (= v) : by defining a series of constraints such as balance

in ionic sys composition range of each phase

one of the earliest example of G minimization by White (1958) → chem equil in an ideal gas mixture of O, H, N with the species H, H2, H2O, N, N2, NH, NO, O, O2, OH

jii

ij

iii

iitot

Nxa

aRTGG

GNG

ln

# of atoms of element j (O, H, N only) in species (H, H2, H2O, NH, NO…)

Page 8: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

→ presenting 2 methods of G minimization the typical one is to use Lagrange’s method of multipliers: irrespective of # of phases and components

here, finding NΦ (fraction or amount of each phase), xk

Φ

(mole fraction of k in the phase Φ) which minimize G this is the equil calculation

Then, why this method ?

with the constraints of

p

mGNG1

0 ,0111

p

ii

c

kk xNNx

∴ by defining

p c

kk

p

kk

c

kk

p

m xxNNGNagrangianL1 1111

)1()()(

00

Page 9: From Chapter 9 of  Saunders and Miodownik ’ s CALPHAD book Computational methods

adding ∑0·k + ∑0·Φ to the original eq not changing its value

→ minimum condition of L ?

p 1, 0

p 1, and c 1, 0

c 1, 0

p 1, 0

L

kxL

kL

NL

k

k

# of p eq

# of c eq

# of p x c eq

# of p eq

thus, to solve 2p + c (p+1) non-linear eq by the Newton-Raphson method

Germany SOLGASMIX ChemSage FactSage

Canada FACT FactSage

Sweden Thermo-Calc

England MTDATA

Germany, MPI Lukas program