FROM BOAT-TO-FORK: LESSONS LEARNED FROM MARKET-BASED ADAPTATION IN DELCAMBRE, LA
-
Upload
rural-soc -
Category
Environment
-
view
55 -
download
0
description
Transcript of FROM BOAT-TO-FORK: LESSONS LEARNED FROM MARKET-BASED ADAPTATION IN DELCAMBRE, LA
FROM BOAT-TO-FORK:
LESSONS LEARNED FROM MARKET-BASED ADAPTATION IN DELCAMBRE, LA
Rural Sociological Society New Orleans, La August 3, 2014
Candace K. May
Assistant Professor of Sociology
Boat-to-Fork: Direct Seafood Marketing
Questions
1. How do state, regional, and local political, economic, and fisheries institutions foster, support , oppose, or create barriers for local market-based adaptation strategies among fisheries?
2. What forms of local and individual political, social, and economic, built, and natural capital are necessary for adoption of the boat-to-fork program?
3. What are broader social consequences of the boat-to-fork program – for traditional marketing mechanisms, such as roadside peddling and fish houses; fisheries infrastructure, such as seafood processors; local businesses and community members; or, expansion of direct marketing to additional local products/agricultural goods?
Case Study Design
• Review of Documents &Existing Statistics
• Field Work – Observations
• Seafood & Farmers’ Markets
• Public Meetings
• Town and Environment
– Interviews • DDS fisherpeople (fishers, dealers, and processors)
• Non-DDS Fisherpeople
• Non-fisher community members
• Representatives from Twin Parish Port, Steering Committee, LSU Ag Center & Sea Grant, and Daily Operations Staff
– Purposive Sampling and Chain Referral
Delcambre, La • Population Size
– 1,866 (2010)
– 2,127 (2000)
• Demographics – 51.6% Female
– 35.2 Median Age
– 80.9% White
– 16% Black
– 4.7 % Hispanic/Latino
– 0.9 % Asian
– 0.6% Native American
– $36,667 Household Median • $41,734 (La)
• $52,762 (US)
• Economy – Agriculture, Fishing, Seafood
Processing, and Oil and Gas Services
• Seafood – 150 US Ports – 2004
• 35th in Value • 49th in Lbs of Seafood
– 2012 • No longer listed as a significant
commercial fishing port
• Location – Central Coastal – Overlaps Iberia & Vermillion
Parishes – Delcambre Canal/Bayou Carlin
offers direct access to the Gulf
Delcambre
0.8 square miles Base Flood Elevation – 11ft
Hurricane Rita, 2005
Recovery from Rita: Elevation
Hurricane Ike, 2008
Deepwater Horizon, 2010
Hurricane Isaac, 2012
102
$146
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Mill
ion
s La Shrimp, Pounds & Value
10,670
$4,500
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
Mill
ion
s Shrimp Imports, Pounds & Value • 90% of seafood;
50% is farmed; 30% is shrimp (by value)
• 90% of shrimp consumed in in the US is farmed over seas
• 25% of US Seafood • 2nd, behind Alaska • 42% of shrimp
Nominal and Adjusted $/Lb
$1.41
$1.44
$0.98
$0.42
$0.47 $0.29
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
La Nominal
La Adjused, 1996 Imported Nominal Imported Adjusted, 1996
Fewer but Larger Firms?
Delcambre, “A town to smart to die”
• 2006, After Katrina/Rita • Town/Port Steering
Committee – 2 Lawyers – 2 Business-persons – 1 Engineer – Executive Director of Non-
Profit – Council-person
• Informal Networks – Childhood Friends, Church,
School, Social Functions
• LSU Ag Center/Sea Grant
• Tasks – Identify Projects for Long-
terms Econ Development – Build Recreational
Community – Grants/Financing – Identify legal Issues – Seek University Assistance – Public Involvement &
Media
• Monthly Meetings – Delcambre Mayor,
Vermillion Parish Police Jury, Iberia Parish Council, Twin Parish Port Commission
• New Recreational Boat Launch w/ Expanded Parking
• Additional Piers/Docking for Fishers
• Seafood Market Pavilion
• Fishing & Observation Pier
• Marina w/ Long Term Recreational Storage, Dockside Facilities, & Parking
The Port of Delcambre once had more than 100 shrimp boats in its fleet. Today, there are fewer than 30. The Delcambre Direct program is helping revitalize the fishing community (Coastal Clips 2011, No. 22).
New Pavilion
Branding
La Direct Seafood
Preliminary Findings: Interviews
• Steering Committee/Sea Grant (4/3-8)
– Difficulties getting fishers involved
• Demand is greater than supply
– Initial (?) push back from processors and dealers
• Vietnamese processor processes Vermillion Bay Sweet shrimp
– Public informed after the fact
– Whole project has been experimental
• Community Members (2/5-10)
– Little knowledge of the program or developments
Preliminary Findings: Interviews
• DDS Fishers (2/5-10)
– Always sold direct, now ‘losing’ customers
– Vermilion Bay Sweet
• “Chemical Free”
• Vermilion Bay
– Reallocation of dock space to recreational boats
– High shrimp prices at dock
• Non-DDS Fishers (0/5-10)
Preliminary Findings: Observations
• Extremely strong place attachment
• Enthusiastic participation in Seafood & Farmers’ Market
• Enthusiastic consumer demand
• Local grocery, fish house, & fish shops accept SNAP
• Numerous direct seafood marketing projects across the state
• DDS participating fishers are not necessarily ‘local’
Other Interesting Findings & Further Questions
• Informal Interviews – Interdependent relationship between fish houses
and small-scale fishers • “Sold my soul to the company store”
• Credit/debt keeps small fishers fishing
– Lack of trust for LSU/Sea Grant?
• Participation & Accountability?
• Compatibility/Competition with existing local mechanisms?
• What exactly does local mean in this context?
Questions?