frimodige

44
Staff Opinion Survey 2005 TEAMS and USPS Data collected: 2nd quarter 2005 © 2005, ISR (a trade name of International Survey Research LLC ) www.isrinsight.com

description

 

Transcript of frimodige

Page 1: frimodige

Staff Opinion Survey 2005TEAMS and USPS

Data collected: 2nd quarter 2005

© 2005, ISR (a trade name of International Survey Research LLC)www.isrinsight.com

Page 2: frimodige

2

Teams and USPS Participation Rate

Surveys Outgoing: 8,230

Surveys Returned: 4,976

Return Rate: 60%

Return Rate

Page 3: frimodige

3

Category Percent Favorable Scores

Diversity Physical Working Conditions

Work/Life BalanceSupervision

Working Relationships Employee Engagement

Quality and Customer Service Work Organization/Operating Efficiency

Employee Involvement/Empowerment University Image

Career DevelopmentTraining

Performance Management Respect and Fairness

Leadership Benefits

Reaction to the SurveyCommunication

Organizational ChangePeopleSoft Implementation

Pay

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

29

37

44

46

47

49

51

52

54

57

67

67

67

68

69

70

72

82

38

71

84

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Page 4: frimodige

4

ISR Norms – “The Standard of the World”

• ISR surveys over 1 million employees every year, allowing us to aggregate the responses across clients to create robust benchmarks.

• All ISR norms are updated annually and statistically weighted to assure they are representative of the U.S. labor force as a whole.

Page 5: frimodige

5

Center Line: ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Colored bars indicate a statistically significant difference.

Category Comparison With ISR’s U.S. National NormUniversity of Florida Staff Survey 2005

-16

-15

-6

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

-1

0

0

1

1

3

4

4

-8

-20 -10 0 10 20

Physical Working ConditionsWork/Life Balance

Benefits

Career Development

Training

Employee Involvement/Empowerment

Supervision

Work Organization/Operating Efficiency

Performance Management

Diversity

Quality and Customer Service

University Image

Employee Engagement

Working Relationships

Communication

Respect and Fairness

Leadership

Pay

Page 6: frimodige

6*A statistically significant difference.

51

48

60

48

51

27

34

26

39

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

10. Our pay at UF is as good as or better than the pay in workplaces elsewhere.

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Pay

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

30. I understand how my pay is determined.

48. I think I am fairly paid compared with:

a. New people at my level

b. Other people in my department

c. People in other departments

28 46

-12* 26* 23*

19 42

-14* 30* 23*

17 49

16 33

13 60

-8* 15 26*

-21* 20* 32*

Page 7: frimodige

7*A statistically significant difference.

34

11

13

0 20 40 60 80 100

Total Good

77. Regarding pay, how good a job do you feel UF is doing in the following areas:

a. Keeping pay in line with the times

b. Matching pay to job performance

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Pay

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Don’t Know

Total PoorAverage

25 59 3

20 65 4

-23* 32* 28* 6*

Page 8: frimodige

8

34 28

26 23

*A statistically significant difference.

63

66

35

44

52

38

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

14. The decisions made by the University President and Vice Presidents concerning USPS/TEAMS employees are usually fair.

34. The following are interested in the well-being of employees:

a. The President and Vice President

b. Deans and Directors

c. Department Chairs and Managers

28 28

-23* 15* 19*

37 28

-28* 14* 23*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Leadership

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Page 9: frimodige

9

65

63

70

68

49

56

0 20 40 60 80 100

*A statistically significant difference.

Total Favorable51. Overall, I believe the following are well managed:

a. My department

b. My college or division

c. The university as a whole

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005Leadership

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

?Total %Unfav.

8 24

-2* 9*

21*

23 21

-7* 16* 21

29 22

-17* 17* 18*

Page 10: frimodige

10*A statistically significant difference.

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

12. Employees in my department are treated with respect, regardless of their job.

32. I am satisfied with the procedures for resolving employee complaints.

49. UF’s employee discipline process is:

a. Fair

b. Effective

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Respect & Fairness

7 22 0 9*21*

34 28

39 15

43 25

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

71

37

70

32

46

0 20 40 60 80 100

Page 11: frimodige

11*A statistically significant difference.

85

6653

74

27

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

62. Work is usually distributed fairly among employees in my department.

72. I think the job I perform is considered important at UF.

67. I feel my personal contributions are recognized:

a. In my department

b. At UF

12 35 -12* 10* 25*

12 15

-11* 6* 9*

10 27

27 46

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Respect & Fairness

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Page 12: frimodige

12

55

56

68

54

34

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

71. I believe the following groups value the contributions made by employees in my department:

a. Students

b. Other Staff

c. Faculty

d. Department Chairs and Managers

e. Deans and Directors

f. President and Vice Presidents

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Respect & Fairness

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

25 20

17 15

21 22

23 22

30 26

37 29

Page 13: frimodige

13

56

44

64

56

38

31

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

13 31

-8* 11* 25*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Communication

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

8. UF does an excellent job of keeping employees informed about matters affecting us.

61. Sufficient effort is made to get

the opinions and thoughts of employees at UF.

82. How satisfied are you with the information you receive on what’s going on at UF?

37 25

-17* 25* 20*

22 47

-13* 14* 42*

*A statistically significant difference.

Neither Total %Dissat.

Total Satisfied

Page 14: frimodige

14

(N) Indicates ‘Disagreeing’ is the favorable response*A statistically significant difference.

29

60

31

66

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Communication

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

28. Most of the time it is safe to speak up in my department.

47. I usually hear about important matters first through rumors. (N)

9 25

6* 13* 27*

12 57

1 11* 60*

Page 15: frimodige

15

39

38

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

18. I have enough information about why the changes below were implemented at UF:

a. The separation of UF from the State’s management of

the university system

b. The TEAMS initiative

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Organizational Change

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

19 43

18 43

Page 16: frimodige

16

74. With all things considered, the pace of change at UF is:

*A statistically significant difference.

About Right, 38%

Too Fast, 14%

No Opinion, 24%

Too Slow, 24%

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 ISR’s U.S. National Norm

Organizational Change

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

About Right, 43%

Too Fast, 13%

No Opinion, 29%*

Too Slow, 15%*

Page 17: frimodige

17

79. Looking ahead to the next year or so, I think UF will:

*A statistically significant difference.

Change for the Better,

30%

Stay the Same, 48%

No Opinion, 10%

Change for the Worse,

12%

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 ISR’s U.S. National Norm

Change for the Better,

45%*

Stay the Same, 36%*

No Opinion,

8%*Change for the Worse,

11*

Organizational Change

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Page 18: frimodige

18

Working Relationships

58

83

78

87

66

80

83

73

47

0 20 40 60 80 100

*A statistically significant difference.

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

27. The people I work with usually get along well together.

46. There is a good cooperation between:

a. Employees in my department

b. My department and other departments

60. At UF, teamwork is:

a. Encouraged

b. Given recognition

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

5 12

-4* 4* 9*

6 14 2* 8* 14

17 17

13 14 -9* 7* 11*

23 30

-11* 15* 27*

Page 19: frimodige

19*A statistically significant difference.

66

61

77

57

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

19. UF is highly regarded by:

a. The Gainesville community

b. The general public nationally

c. Employees

15 8

27 9

2* 25* 14*

18 25 -9* 14* 19*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

University Image

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Page 20: frimodige

20

58

73

72

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

19. UF is highly regarded by:

d. Faculty

e. Students

39. UF is a “good neighbor” with our surrounding communities.

29 13

23 5

18 9

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

University Image

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Page 21: frimodige

21*A statistically significant difference.

85

83

78

73

77

73

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

52. My department:

a. Constantly looks for better ways to serve its customers

b. Actively seeks to understand customer requirements and expectations

c. Is responsive to customer needs

15 12

-10* 9* 8*

13 10

-8* 8* 7*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Quality and Customer Service

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

13 14

-5* 11* 10*

Page 22: frimodige

22*A statistically significant difference.

41

43

46

46

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

15. In my department we too often sacrifice the quality of services we are able to provide in order to:

a. Cut costs (N)

b. Meet schedules/ deadlines (N)

17 37

5* 15* 44*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Quality and Customer Service

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

15 39

3* 15 42*

Page 23: frimodige

23*A statistically significant difference.

88

86

89

79

87

79

84

86

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

11. My supervisor works well with people who are different from him- or herself (in gender, racial/ethnic background, lifestyle, etc.).

31. UF provides a working environment that accepts:

a. Ethnic differences

b. Difference in cultural background or lifestyle

c. Gender differences

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Diversity

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

8 5

-2* 6* 4

9 7

-4* 7* 6*

7 14

0 11* 10*

8 6

0 9* 5*

Page 24: frimodige

24

28

68

72

75

19

74

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

3. I understand how my performance on the job is evaluated.

22. I think my performance on the job is evaluated fairly.

42. UF is too lenient with employees who perform poorly. (N)

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Performance Management

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

24 57

-9* 24 48*

(N) Indicates ‘Disagreeing’ is the favorable response*A statistically significant difference.

10 16

5* 13* 19*

9 16

3* 9* 18*

Page 25: frimodige

25

76. How do you rate your last performance review on the following:

a. Helping you identify your strengths and weaknesses

b. Helping you improve your job performance

c. Helping you identify your training needs

d. Helping you in your career development and planning

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Performance Management

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

40

45

51

55

51

54

36

43

0 20 40 60 80 100

Total PoorTotal Good

*A statistically significant difference.

AverageDon’t Know

23 15 11

25* 15 9*

21 28 15

26* 24* 10*

22 14 11

23* 12* 9*

23 21 13

27* 20 7*

-2*

-1

-2*

-4*

Page 26: frimodige

26

67

56

74

63

64

75

68

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

21. My department operates efficiently.

41. Priorities or work objectives in my department change so frequently I have trouble getting my work done. (N)

2. The work in my department is well organized.

56. In my department, reporting relationships are clearly defined (who reports to whom).

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Work Organization/Operating Efficiency

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

10 26

-10* 8* 18*

10 27

7* 10 33*

(N) Indicates ‘Disagreeing’ is the favorable response*A statistically significant difference.

9 23

0 9 24

9 16

Page 27: frimodige

27

49

36

34

28

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

38. I believe the following UF administrators understand the challenges faced as result of the recent PeopleSoft implementation:

a. Department Chairs and Managers

b. Deans and Directors

c. The President and Vice Presidents

65. I believe that although the PeopleSoft implementation has been challenging, it will benefit UF in the long term.

22 29

28 37

29 43

34 32

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

PeopleSoft Implementation

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Page 28: frimodige

28

81. I believe that in the next one year (12 months), using PeopleSoft to do my work will:

Become Easier, 21%

Become Harder, 14%

Stay the Same, 37%

No Opinion (Does not apply

to me), 27%

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005

PeopleSoft Implementation

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Page 29: frimodige

29

71

56

65

57

69

71

72

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

4. My supervisor gives me regular feedback on my performance.

23. My supervisor shows favoritism to some employees in my department. (N)

43. I have confidence in the decisions made by my supervisor.

58. My supervisor gives me recognition for a job well done.

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Supervision

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

9 18

7 22

0 8 21

7 24

4* 10* 25

10 33

1 10 34

(N) Indicates ‘Disagreeing’ is the favorable response*A statistically significant difference.

Page 30: frimodige

30

71

73

81

73

81

82

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

66. My supervisor:

a. Is available when needed

b. Communicates effectively

c. Manages people well

d. Is approachable

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Supervision

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

5 14

9 27

-6* 9 20*

5 14

0 6* 14

6 21

0 8* 19*

*A statistically significant difference.

Page 31: frimodige

31*A statistically significant difference.

69

77

69

75

66

70

74

71

64

79

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

45. My supervisor involves me in:

a. Planning our work

b. Solving problems related to our work

c. Making decisions that affect our work

59. Regarding suggestions for change, my supervisor usually:

a. Listens to my ideas

b. Acts on my input

7 22 5* 10* 24*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Employee Involvement/Empowerment

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

7 15 2* 10* 14

13 22 -5* 12* 19*

6 19 1* 9* 17*

7 23 1 8* 22

Page 32: frimodige

32*A statistically significant difference.

81

66

79

63

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

6. I am satisfied with my involvement in decisions that affect my work.

25. I have sufficient authority to do my job well.

9 28

-3* 10* 24*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Employee Involvement/Empowerment

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

6 15

-2* 6 13*

Page 33: frimodige

33

43

60

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

69. In my department:

a. Employees are encouraged to report fraud or wrongdoing

b. Employees’ reports of fraud or wrongdoing are acted upon

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Employee Involvement/Empowerment

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

24 16

42 15

Page 34: frimodige

34*A statistically significant difference.

48

47

63

66

51

45

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable26. There are sufficient opportunities

for me to receive:

a. Professional development and/or training to improve my skills in my current job

b. Cross-training to learn other jobs

c. Professional development and/or training to increase my chances for a better job

10 24

3* 11* 27*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Training

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

18 36

-2* 15* 38*

16 34

3* 16 36*

Page 35: frimodige

35*A statistically significant difference.

57

63

5662

58

41

76

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

63. So far, my career progress at UF meets my expectations.

13. I think the UF offers long-term career opportunities for me.

33. There is adequate opportunity for employees to learn about available UF job openings.

50. UF usually promotes qualified employees before hiring people from outside of the university.

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Career Development

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

11 13

13* 15* 23*

28 31

-16* 19* 24*

11 31

15 23

6* 16 28*

Page 36: frimodige

36*A statistically significant difference.

65

73

78

23

64

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

9. UF’s benefits (health, retirement, etc.) programs fit my needs.

29. UF’s benefits are as good as or better than the benefits (health, retirement, etc.) in workplaces elsewhere

70. I would be willing to pay more for parking if I were nearly always guaranteed a parking space.

7 15

6* 11* 16*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Benefits

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

18 18

-1 16* 19*

16 61

Page 37: frimodige

37

49

55

61

57

64

46

57

44

13

71

13

35

0 20 40 60 80 100

*A statistically significant difference.

Total Percent Favorable

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005Benefits

Don’t KnowAdequate

Total Poor

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

75. Please give your opinion of the following benefits:

a. Annual leave

b. Dental insurance

c. Life insurance

d. Health insurance

e. Pension/retirement plan

f. Sick leave

g. Personal days

h. Parental leave

i. Child care

N/A

22 6 1 1 9* 28* 8* 1 2* 18 49 11 9

35 8 8 4

26 9 1 0

23 12 2 6

15 6 21 24

8 13 29 36

28 12 1 2 1 29 10* 2* 4* 29 6 8 1 -2* 28 14* 5* 3*

Page 38: frimodige

38*A statistically significant difference.

71

58

75

79

83

55

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

5. My supervisor is considerate of my life outside of work.

36. There is usually sufficient staff in my department to handle the workload.

53. My work schedule allows reasonable flexibility to meet my personal/family needs.

8 13

4* 10* 15*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Work/Life Balance

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

8 38

-3* 8 34*

4 13

12* 7* 23*

Page 39: frimodige

39*A statistically significant difference.

87

72

74

80

88

77

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

5. Overall, the physical working conditions at UF are satisfactory.

24. I have the equipment and tools I need to do my job effectively.

44. My work location is a safe place to work.

7 13

7* 5* 21*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Physical Working Conditions

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

6 17

5* 7* 21*

4 8

1 5* 8

Page 40: frimodige

40*A statistically significant difference.

66

23

70

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

17. Filling in this survey is a good way to tell UF what I think.

37. I believe significant actions will be taken as a result of this survey.

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Reaction to the Survey

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

18 12

3* 16* 17*

33 43

Page 41: frimodige

41*A statistically significant difference.

50

92

83

77

83

84

27

90

0 20 40 60 80 100

?Total %Unfav.Total Percent Favorable

1. I would recommend theUniversity of Florida (UF) as a good place to work.

20. I am proud to be a part of UF.

40. I work beyond what is required to help UF succeed.

55. I would stay at UF even if offered another job elsewhere with higher pay.

7 9 7* 11* 12*

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

Employee Engagement

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

23 50

-23* 17* 33*

10 6

1 11 7

7 3

-2* 5* 3

Page 42: frimodige

42*A statistically significant difference.

No

University of Florida Staff Survey 2005

YesDon’t Know

UF Staff (Teams and USPS) 2005 (N=4,976)

ISR’s U.S. National Norm (N=154,026)

Employee Engagement

67

59

0 20 40 60 80 100

78. At the present time, are you seriously considering leaving UF for reasons other than retirement?

15 27

-8* 18* 15*

Page 43: frimodige

43

Summary of Issues

Pay: Pay vs. other organizations; understanding how pay is determined; perceived fairness compared with new people, other people within and outside of the department; keeping pay current and matching pay to performance.

Leadership: Senior leaders making fair decisions; being interested in employee well-being; overall management of University and College/Division.

Respect and Fairness: Procedures to resolve complaints; fairness/effectiveness of discipline process; distribution of work; recognizing contributions, especially more senior levels.

Communication: Keeping employees informed; getting their opinions

Working Relationships: Encouraging and recognizing teamwork; relations/cooperation within the work group and across departments

Quality and Customer Service: Looking for better ways to serve customers, understand their requirements, being responsive

Performance Management: Leniency with poor performers

Work Organization: Departmental efficiency

Career Development: Promoting internally; career progress meeting expectations

Organizational Change: Informing employees about changes; moving too slowly

Potential Areas for Improvement

Page 44: frimodige

44

Summary of Issues

Physical Working Conditions: Having the equipment/tools to do the job and a safe place to work

Work/Life Balance: Supervisor considerate of life outside of work; schedule offers reasonable flexibility to meet personal family needs

Benefits: UF benefits fit employee needs; compare well with benefits offered in other workplaces

Career Development: UF offers long-term opportunities and information about available UF job openings

Training: Opportunities to receive training to improve skills in current job, increases chances for a better job

Performance Management: Understanding how performance is evaluated, belief that it is evaluated fairly

Employee Involvement/Empowerment & Supervision: Supervisors involving employees in planning work, solving problems and making decisions;

Supervision: Confidence in supervisor’s decisions, supervisors giving regular feedback on performance; giving recognition for a job well done; not showing favouritism; being available, approachable, and communicating effectively

Relative Strengths