Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

download Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

of 21

Transcript of Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    1/21

    Friction Stir Processing ofAluminum Fusion Welds

    Christian Fuller, Murray Mahoney, and

    William BingelRockwell Scientific Co.

    Funded by: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), under

    contract No. MDA972-02-C-0300, and Dr. Leo Christodoulou, Program Manager

    Presented at AeroMat 2003, Dayton, OH, USA - June 9-12, 2003

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    2/21

    OutlineNovember 20, 2003 Chart 2

    Introduction

    Why Friction Stir Processing (FSP)?

    FSP Approaches

    AA 6061 Microstructure

    Mechanical Properties of AA 5083

    Tensile Data

    Fatigue Data

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    3/21

    Friction Stir Processing (FSP):November 20, 2003 Chart 3

    Is a local thermomechanical process for material propertyimprovement

    Has been shown to improve:

    Properties of cast Al and NiAl Bronze

    The cracking resistance of fusion welded Al

    FSP

    Base

    Material

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    4/21

    Experimental MethodsNovember 20, 2003 Chart 4

    In this study we used:

    Automated MIG (metal inert-gas) welding

    6 mm (single-pass fusion weld) 6061-T651 and 5083-H321

    Filler alloy AA 5356

    Residual stress measurements - Lambda Research

    Fatigue testing- MetCut Research Inc. Tensile testing- Metals Technology

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    5/21

    FSP Approaches for Fusion WeldsNovember 20, 2003 Chart 5

    Fusion weld crown FSP

    Fusion weld toes FSP

    Fusion weld crownand root FSP

    Approach 1

    Approach 2 Approach 3

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    6/21

    As-Fusion Welded 6061-T651November 20, 2003 Chart 6

    Fusion weld

    6061 base metal

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    7/21

    As-Fusion WeldedNovember 20, 2003 Chart 7

    Fusion Weld, AA 5356 Parent Material, AA 6061

    Mg, Si

    (Mg2Si?) Al, Fe, Si

    (Al5(Fe,Si)?)

    Al6(Mn,Fe)

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    8/21

    Weld Toe FSP: MacrographsNovember 20, 2003 Chart 8

    6061 base metal

    FSP RegionFusion weld FSP Region

    FSP Region FSP Region

    6061 base metal

    Fusion weld

    Fusion weld on

    retreating side

    Fusion weld onadvancing side

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    9/21

    Weld Toe FSP: MicrohardnessNovember 20, 2003 Chart 9

    70

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    105

    -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6

    Fusion Weld on Advancing SideFusion Weld on Retreating Side

    Vicke

    rsmicrohardness(kgmm-2)

    Distance from FSP nugget (mm)

    FSPFusion Weld(AA 5356)

    Parent Material(AA 5083)

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    10/21

    Weld Toe FSP: SEM MicrographsNovember 20, 2003Chart 10

    Al6(Mn,Fe)

    Mg,Si

    Al, Fe, Si

    Fusion Weld FSP Region Parent Material

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    11/21

    Weld Crown FSP: MacrographsNovember 20, 2003Chart 11

    6061 base metal

    FSP Region

    Fusion weld

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    12/21

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    13/21

    Surface FinishesNovember 20, 2003Chart 13

    Weld Crown FSPAs-Fusion Welded

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    14/21

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    15/21

    Residual Stresses- FSP vs. As-WeldedNovember 20, 2003Chart 15

    Parallel to Weld Perpendicular to Weld

    -160

    -120

    -80

    -40

    0

    40

    80

    120

    -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60

    As-Fusion, SurfaceFSP, SurfaceAs-Fusion, 1.6 mm deepFSP, 1.6 mm deep

    Distance from fusion weld centerline (mm)

    ResidualS

    tress(MPa)

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60

    As-Fusion, SurfaceFSP, SurfaceAs-Fusion, 1.6 mm deepFSP, 1.6 mm deep

    Distance from fusion weld centerline (mm)

    ResidualS

    tress(MPa)

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    16/21

    Mechanical PropertiesNovember 20, 2003Chart 16

    Fatigue Specimen Tensile Specimen

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    17/21

    Tensile Properties, 5083 Al-4 mm dia. gaugeNovember 20, 2003Chart 17

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    y

    UTS

    E

    TensileProperties(M

    Pa)

    Elongation(%)

    As-FusionWelded

    Weld ToeFSP

    Weld CrownFSP

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    18/21

    Fatigue PropertiesNovember 20, 2003Chart 18

    R = 0.1, 30 Hz, load control

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    19/21

    Fatigue Properties-5083/5356November 20, 2003Chart 19

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    220

    240

    104 105 106 107 108

    As-Fusion WeldedWeld Toe FSPWeld Crown FSP

    MaximumS

    tress(MPa)

    Number of Cycles to Failure

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    20/21

    Fractured Fatigue Specimens-5083/5356November 20, 2003Chart 20

    Weld Toe FSPAs-Fusion Welded

  • 8/9/2019 Friction Stir Processing of Aluminium Fusion Welds

    21/21

    ConclusionsNovember 20, 2003Chart 21

    All FSP approaches (weld toe FSP, weld crown FSP, andweld crown and root FSP) produced a recrystallized, fine-grained microstructure

    The tensile properties of AA 5083 were not significantlyeffected by FSP location.

    Fatigue resistance of AA 5083 increased with the addition ofFSP.

    However, a noticeable difference between the FSPapproaches was not observed.