trucking + SUSTAINABILITYBabin | Hrynkiewicz | Yim

context + RELEVANCE

sustainability + STRATEGIES

actors + INTERESTS

+ contentsimplications + CONCLUSION

importance + ECONOMY

= 10, 000 employees = 10% of gross tonnage

2007

impact + ENVIRONMENT

= 0.5 Mt CO2eq

1990

2007

161%

= 0.5 Mt CO2eq

161%mode + ENERGY

HEAVY TRUCKING

MEDIUM TRUCKING

OFF ROAD

MARINE

RAIL

2006

sustainability + STRATEGIES

DESIGN + maintenance

COMBINATION + vehicles

PARTNERSHIPS + logistics

TECHNOLOGY + implementation

design + MAINTENANCE

15 % fuel efficiency increase from aerodynamics

+

30 % extra capacity from super cube

= 1 % capacity

combination + VEHICLES

1/3 less fuel use as two trailers with same load

32 % reduced diesel use in Alberta

partnerships + LOGISTICS

CO2

NOx

PM10

PM2.5

data SMARTWAY shipper tool

technology + IMPLEMENTATION

14 L / 100 KM in fuel savings

2nd gen hybrid engines

actors + INTERESTS

business + REGULATION

= 13, 000 personal automobiles

2020

= = 100, 000 tonnes of CO2

per year

business + ENVIRONMENT

4.4%

50%

= decrease in nitrogen oxide emissions = increase in overall GHG emissions

business + COSTS

1992

2007

= profit = costs

sustainability + LOGISTICS

10 % of total mileage

10,000 miles of non revenue generating travel

1,200 gallons of inefficient fuel use

sustainability + LOGISTICS

trafficcongestion

environmentaldegradation

tripfrequency

inventorymobility

+ implications

data collection

modal communication

actor collaboration

+ discussion

1 Do you believe to achieve sustainability it is possible to reduce within the industry or should there be a greater modal split between industries?

2 How can you balance increasing demand against the sustainability of the industry?

3 What do you think the answer to ensure small low-margin businesses switch to more sustainable practices?

+ the end