Freelance survey 2012
-
Upload
trifinance -
Category
Business
-
view
229 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Freelance survey 2012
FREELANCE SURVEY2012
Presentation1
� A word on the methodology used
� How the market for freelancers looks like
� What is the freelancer facing? The freelancer perspective
� Freelancers and Service Providers, a Win-Win scenario?
� Conclusions
Content
Presentation1
What is a Freelancer?
We define a freelancer as an interim manager, or expertworking on a temporary and
independent basis with a company or organization.
Presentation1
Freelance Survey
Online March - April
2012
500 respondents
Joint initiative
Presentation1
Fast MovingFin
ance, B
ankin
g &
Insurance
Automotive, Transport & Logistics
IT &
Tele
com
Oth
er
Healthcare - ICT
Utilities Public
Media
Travel, Tourism & HoReCa
Non p
rofit
Bio
technolo
gy
Education
Creative, Art, Culture, Photography, etc
Who were these 500 Freelancers?Industries
Presentation1
Finance & AccountingProject Management
Marketin
g &
Com
municatio
n
ICT
HR &
Train
ing
Sale
s
Administration Operations: Production, manufacturing & quality
Other
Procurement, supply chain & logistics
Customer ServiceLegal
R&D &
Engin
eerin
g
Who were these 500 Freelancers?Activity domains
Presentation1
2%
22%
44%
25%
7%
26-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-72
7%
14%
14%
12%
9%
6%
6%
6%
3%
1%
4%
19%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>10
Age Experience
Who were these 500 Freelancers?Age & Experience
N = 343 N = 198
55%
Presentation1
N = 380
Who were these 500 Freelancers?Gender
79%
21%
Presentation1
9
13% 24%
41%
12%
4%
2%
4%
5%
31%
13%
60%
23%Abroad
Who were these 500 Freelancers?Regions of activity
N = 372
“Golden Triangle”
Presentation1
THE MARKET FOR FREELANCE ASSIGNMENTS
How the market for freelancers looks like
Presentation1
N = 418
2012
After some challenging years, the freelancers anticipate a positive trend
Presentation1
N = 64N = 422
85%
8%
4%
1%
2%
15%
Did you find an assignment during last 6 months of 2011?
I didn't find an assignment
It was my choice not to have an
assignment
I'm a freelancer only since 2012
Other
Yes No
Chargeability over the last 6 months
Presentation1
55% of freelancers feel and expect higher competition
2009 2010 H1 - 2011 H2 - 2011 H1 - 2012 H2 - 2012
Competition is increasing
N = 407
Presentation1
N = 398
2009 2010 H1 - 2011 H2 - 2011 H1 - 2012 H2 - 2012
Fee evolution is negative
Presentation1
10%5% 8% 12%
65%
55% 44%23%
21%
28%32%
37%
4%6%
6%21%
5%5% 5%4% 2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Bachelor or
High school
short type
Master or
High school
long type or
university
Post
university
PHD/ MBA
Impact of education on fee
300-499 500-699 700-899
900-1099 1100-1299 1300-1500
N = 295N = 301
N = 282
550
600
650
700
750
31-40 41-50 51-60 61-72
Impact of age on fee
Average fee Median Fee
711
640
500
550
600
650
700
750
Man Woman
Impact of gender on fee
Average Fee Median Fee
Age, Gender & Education are factors that influence the daily fee
Presentation1
N = 334 N = 340
N = 340 N = 309
600
620
640
660
680
700
720
740
0-3
months
4-6
months
7-12
months
1-2 years More than
2 years
Average Fee per Assignment Duration
600
650
700
750
2 3 4 5
Average rate per billable days per week
747 727 714 709 705 705 704 698 698 687 673 663
0100200300400500600700800
Impact of sector on fee
Average Fee
Median Fee
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
Impact of roles on fee
Average Fee
Count
Median Fee
The assignment role and sector also have impact
Presentation1
What is the freelancer facing?The freelancer perspective
Presentation1
N = 496
Once a freelancer, ‘always’ a freelancer
61% would not return to a payroll
job
Only 3% considers returning to a payroll job
Remarkably, those considering to return don’t match the ones that became freelancer through restructuring
Presentation1
N = 496 N = 488
What drives and what holds you back?
Presentation1
- Older Freelancers work less days per week than their younger peers.- Only 27% of 60+ work 5 days a week
N = 362
1%
5%
16%
28%
49%
1%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
1
2
3
4
5
6
Billable days per week
For over 50%, the 5-day week is not the standard
Presentation1
N = 375
The own network preferred and most efficient sourcing channel, closely followed by service providers
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
Own network
(including prior
clients)
Service providers Direct contact
with current
clients
Online sites for
searching
freelance jobs
Social media
Net Promoter Score – Effectiveness Channel
Presentation1
N = 282
42%
31%
13%
5%3%
7%7%
23% 22%20%
11%16%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Once a
week
Once a
month
Once
every 3
months
Once
every 6
months
Once
every
year
Less then
once a
year
Frequency of Networking
online network (N=230)
networking events (N=369)
- Linkedin is most important channel (415 first degree contacts)- Own website is perceived as (rather) important to 34% of FL’s.
Yes
61%
No
39%
Actively participatingin online networks
N = 375
Regarding this own network, ‘online’ is not omnipresent, but done more frequently
Presentation1
N = 490
Over 1/4th of Freelancers has more than 1 assignment
1/4th of Freelancers has extra remunerated activities
75%
25%
No
Yes
N = 401
Common extra activities:• Accounting• Teaching/Coaching• Directorship• Sales
45%
26%
29%One
Multiple
None
How to mitigate the Financial uncertainty
Presentation1
N = 326
This means that on average, a freelancer is billable for 81%Partially, this is an own choice.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >7
Average length in months in between assignments
Finding assignments: the average length between assignments is 2,28 months
50%
Presentation1
The ideal assignment length is 7-12 months (seconded by assignments of 1-2 years)
13%
20%
32%
22%
13%9%
20%
35%31%
6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
0-3 months 4-6 months 7-12
months
1-2 years More than 2
years
Assignment Duration
average duration (N = 406)
ideal duration (N = 409)
Freelancers want and get assignments of 7 months to 2 years
Presentation1
Freelancers and Service Providers, a Win-Win scenario?
Presentation1
N = 393
82%
18%
Do you have experience in working withService Providers?
Yes
No 43%
57%
Would you consider to work via 1 service provider exclusively?
N = 319
Facts & Figures
35% of ALL freelancers consider working
exclusively
Presentation1
Type Definition
Match makers simply connecting demand & supply
Expertise domain experts focusing on only one domain
Umbrella agents you work under the brand of the agent without any support
Quality agents you work under the brand and you get support to guarantee quality
Big 4 Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG andPricewaterhouseCoopers
Different types of service providers
Presentation1
N = 310 N = 302
12%7%
22% 20%10%
28%
25%
32% 38% 58%
15%
3%
8%4%
10%37%
47%
33%25%
19%
8%19%
7%13%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Match
makers
Expertise
domain
experts
Umbrella
agents
Quality
agents
Big 4
Which type of Service Provider do you know andworked with?
I always work with them
I sometimes work with them
I know the type but I’m not interested in working with them
I know the type but never worked with them
I don’t know this type
6%
5%
16%
41%
6%
26%
0% 20% 40%
Big 4
None
Match makers
Expertise domain
experts
Umbrella agents
Quality agents
For which type of agent are you most likelywilling to work in the future?
Facts & Figures: Who is the preferred partner?
Presentation1
33%29%
24%
11%
2%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
I don't like
they take a
margin on
my fee
I don't see
their added
value
I want to
remain
independent
Did not
know that
existed
Other
Why wouldn’t you work with a Service Provider?
N = 65
* 65 out of the 500 respondentsanswered this question
7 16 5 16
157
7 3 8 80
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Bad
communication/relationship
Bad profile vs assignment
match
Body Shopping
Competition with other
FL/Internal Consultants
High interm
ediary m
argin
Lack of follow-
up/support/feedback
Low contact with end-client /
purpose of the assignement
Short term
ism
Treatm
ent as subordinate
iso partner
Disadvantages of SP's
N = 258
Hate-Love relation: What FL don’t like about SP’s
Presentation1
N = 315 N = 308
5%2% 4% 2% 3%
11%
5%
12%
22%
16% 17%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Loyalty from 0 (not loyal) to 10 (absolutely loyal)
Loyalty FL towards service providers
8%6%
8% 8%5%
14%
9%
15%13%
7% 8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Loyalty from 0 (not loyal) to 10 (absolutely loyal)
Loyalty service providers towards FL
Average loyalty of Freelancers towards Service Providers; 7,92
Average loyalty of Service Providers towards Freelancers; 6,34 >
Hate-Love relation: Loyalty
Presentation1
N = 417
55%
21%14% 7%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
I will contact a
diversity of service
providers
I will stay working a
a freelancer without
commiting to a
service provider
I will commit to one
service provider
I will try to get a
permanent position
Other
What will be your most likely strategy in times of crisis?
Hate-Love relation: But in times of crisis
Presentation1
N = 363
68%
52% 52% 50%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Sharing knowledge Organizing
network events
Support during
assignments
Organizing
trainings
Main actions that Service Providers can take or developfurther to optimize your role as Freelancer
Freelancers have clear expectations
Presentation1
N =
138
Guaranteed number of
chargeable days
Administrative assistance
Network possibilities
Support during
assignments
Training possibilities
Lead generation fees
Earning of quality label:
references,,,
Access to company
knowledge
Primary motivators to work through
SP’s
Presentation1
56%
45%
31%
22%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Expertise
domain experts
Quality agents Match makers Big 4 Umbrella agents
Willingness to work with current SP
N = 267
Freelancers find this with?
Presentation1
What did we learn?
Presentation1
Conclusions on freelancers
Main motivators: autonomy & variation –and not fee or flexibility
Freelancers are aware that market is getting more competitive
Gender inequality in fees
Social media: present, but not as anassignment finder
Higher education resultsin higher fees
Important sourcingchannels: own network& service providers
Preferred type of service provider: expertise domain experts
Concerns towardsservice providers: margin, added value, loyalty
Presentation1
Conclusions on service providers
Finding the right assignments
Financial compensations
Expertise development
Networking
ONCE A FREELANCER, ALWAYS A FREELANCER