FREE PAPER SESSION - Comparing low dose versus high dose CYC in proliferative LN - Dr Sonal Mehra
-
Upload
ira-con -
Category
Healthcare
-
view
22 -
download
3
Transcript of FREE PAPER SESSION - Comparing low dose versus high dose CYC in proliferative LN - Dr Sonal Mehra
To Compare the Efficacy of Low Dose versus High Dose Cyclophosphamide Regimen as Induction Therapy in the Treatment of Proliferative Lupus
Nephritis
Sonal Mehra, Jignesh Usdadiya, Vikramraj Jain, Bharat Singh, Ankit Jain, Dantis Emmanuel, Chengappa KG ,Mithun CB,
Durga Prasanna Misra, Vir Singh NegiJIPMER, Pondicherry
Aims & Objectives
• To Compare the Efficacy of Low Dose versus High Dose CYC Regimen as Induction Therapy in the Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis
• To Compare the Adverse Drug Effects and Infection Risks in Low Dose and High Dose CYC Group
Clintrials.gov. NCT02645565
Inclusion criteria
• Diagnosis of SLE -ACR• Age >16 yrs• Proteinuria ≥ 500 mg in 24 hrs and/or urine R/M - active cellular
casts/sediments (>5 RBC/hpf & >5 WBC/hpf & cellular casts)• Biopsy-proven class III, IV LN
• Treated previously with IV or oral CYC, MMF, cyclosporine or steroids >15mg/day in last 3M
• Renal thrombotic microangiopathy, preexisting CKD, previous malignancy (except skin & CIN), DM, CAD
• Previously documented severe toxicity to immunosuppressive drugs• Acute & chronic infections• Pregnancy
Exclusion criteria
Primary End pointAssessment of Primary Renal Response at
12 & 24 weeks• Complete Response (CR): Urine protein creatinine ratio
<0.5 gm & Normal (GFR > 90 ml/min) or stable (<10% deterioration from baseline if GFR was previously abnormal) renal function & inactive urinary sediments
• Partial Response (PR): ≥50% reduction in proteinuria to subnephrotic levels, normal or stable GFR & inactive urinary sediments
• No Response (NR): Patients will be classified as non responders if criteria for CR or PR are not met and or if they experience severe flare
Consort Diagram
Baseline Demographic DataVariable Low dose
(n=36)High dose
(n=34)P value OR 95%CI
Female/ Male 32/4 31/3 0.53
Age of SLE onset, Yrs (Mean±SD) 28.86 ± 10.29 24.79±9.82 0.09£ -0.73-8.8
Age of onset of nephritis (Mean±SD) 31.08±10.18 26.38±10.26 0.06£ -0.17-9.57
Disease duration, Months (Median, IQR) 21 (4.50-36) 12 (3-24) 0.19€
Clinical features at the time of nephritis ₴
Fever /systemic 5 (14%) 11 (32%) 0.06 33 0.10-1.1
Mucocutaneous 20(56%) 18(53%) 0.58 40 0.11-1.4Arthritis 13(36%) 8(23%) 0.25 83 0.64-5.2Hemolytic Anemia 8(22%) 9(26%) 0.67 94 0.26-2.3Leucopenia 13(36%) 5(15%) 0.04₴ 3.2 1.02-10.5Thrombocytopenia 9(25%) 8(23%) 0.88 1.08 0.36-3.2
Pericardial Effusion 3(8%) 8(23%) 0.08 0.29 0.07-1.2
Pleural Effusion 6(17%) 5(14%) 0.82 1.16 0.31-4.2
Vasculitis 7(19%) 6(18%) 0.84 1.12 0.33-3.7
Myositis 3(8%) 2(6%) 1.00 1.45 0.22-9.2Myocarditis 0(0%) 2(6%) NA NA NA
Baseline Renal Parameters Before Induction Therapy
Variable Low dose (n=36) High dose (n=34) P value 95%CIRenal Biopsy Class IV no. (%) 21 (58%) 26 (76%) 0.10 0.82-6.5 Class III no. (%) 15 (42%) 8 (24%) 0.10 0.82-6.5Activity Score (Median IQR) 4 (4-8) 6.5(4-9) 0.11
Chronicity Score (Median IQR) 1(0-2) 1(0-2) 0.51
Crescents no. (%) 7 (19%) 13 (38%) 0.08 0.87-7.52 Serum creatinine mg/dL (Median IQR)
0.95 (0.80-1.30) 0.90 (0.78-1.72) 1.00
>1.3mg/dL 10(28%) 12(35%) 0.49eGFR *Mean+SD 68.44 ± 23.5 68.06 ± 32.8 0.95 -13.1-13.95 <30 ml/min 3(8%) 6(18%) 0.06 -12.1-0.44Active urinary sediments no.(%) 27(75%) 32(94%) 0.02 0.03-0.94
uPCR gm/day (Median IQR) 1.4 (0.47-2.1) 1.79 (0.80-2.2) 0.43 >3 no. (%) 7(19%) 6(18%) 0.23Renal SLEDAI (Mean+SD) 7.89 +3.76 11.1+3.38 <0.01¥ -4.99 to -1.57
Low Complements C3/C4 no. (%) 24(67%) 24(70%) 0.72 0.30-2.29
Anti-Dsdna >60 IU/ml no. (%) 27(75%) 28(82%) 0.45 0.48-4.96
SLEDAI Median IQR 16(12-20) 18(15-21) 0.07
Response At 12 Weeks Response Variables no.%
Low Dose (n=36)
High Dose (n=34)
P value₴ OR 95%CI
Complete Response(CR)
16(44%) 7 (21%) 0.04 3.08 1.06-8.90
Complete /Partial Response(CR/PR)
20(56%) 9 (26%) 0.01 3.47 1.26-9.49
No response(NR) 16 (44%) 25 (73%) 0.01 0.28 0.10-0.78
Response At 24 Weeks Response Parameters
Low Dose (n=36)
High Dose (n=34)
P value ₴ OR 95% CI
Complete Response(CR)
19 (53%) 18 (53%) 0.98 0.99 0.38-2.54
Complete/Partial Response(CR/PR)
21(58%) 21 (62%) 0.77 0.86 0.33-2.25
No response(NR) 15 (42%) 13 (38%) 0.77 1.15 0.44-3.00
Response At 12 And 24 Weeks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
44
21
53 53
56
26
5862
44
73
4238
Primary Response outcome
CR CR/PR NR
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pa
tient
s
LOW DOSE HIGH DOSE LOW DOSE HIGH DOSE12 WEEKS 24 WEEKS
The Kinetics of Serum Albumin With Therapy
2.883.39 3.44
2.66
3.42 3.57
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks
Ser
um A
lbum
in
(Mea
n)
Kinetics of Serum AlbuminLow Dose High Dose
The Kinetics of Urine-PCR With Therapy
1.4
0.3 0.25
1.79
0.7
0.20
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks
Urin
e P
rote
in C
reat
inin
e R
atio
(M
edia
n)
Kinetics of Urine PCR Low Dose High Dose
The Kinetics of Glomerular Filtration Rate With Therapy
68.4
7273.2
68
7272.8
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks
eGFR
(M
ean)
Kinetics of eGFR Low Dose High Dose
Kinetics of SLEDAI with therapy
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
16
4
4
18
6
3
Kinetics of SLEDAILow Dose High Dose
SLE
DA
I (M
edia
n)
The Kinetics of Renal SLEDAI With Therapy
8
2 2
12
4
2
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks
Ren
al S
LED
AI
(Med
ian)
Kinetics of Renal SLEDAILow Dose High Dose
Kinetic of Low Complements (C3/C4) With Therapy
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
67%
47%
33%
70%
38%
20%
Kinetics of Low C3/C4Low Dose High Dose
SLED
AI
(Med
ian)
Kinetics of Anti-dsDna Positivity With Therapy
Baseline 12 weeks 24 weeks0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
75%
58%
82%
50%
50%
Kinetics of anti-dsDNA positivity Low Dose High Dose
SLE
DA
I (M
edia
n)
Adverse Events During The Induction TherapyAdverse Events Low Dose (n=36) High Dose(n=34) No. of Deaths 2(5%) 2(6%)Benign Non Renal flare 6(17%) 3(9%)Severe Non Renal Flare* 1(3%) 0(0%)Atleast one adverse event 30(83%) 29(85%)Alopecia₴ 1(3%) 7(21%)Gastrointestinal (nausea/Vomiting/Diarrhea) 2(5%) 5(9%)InfectionsTotal No. Of Episodes 20(55%) 16(47%)Severe infections Sepsis 2(5%) 2(6%) Pneumonia 4(11%) 1(3%) Osteomyelitis 1(3%) 0(0%)URTI/ Nasopharyngitis 4(11%) 4(12%)Herpes Zoster 1(3%) 0(0%)Varicella Zoster 0(0%) 1(3%)Urinary tract Infection 1(3%) 0(0%)Strongyloides infection 0(0%) 2(6%)Oral candidiasis 4(11%) 2(6%)Skin tissue infections 3(8%)
3(8%)
Toxic anemia 2(5%) 6(18%)New onset CYC induced Leukopenia$ (<4000/cumm)
0(0%) 6(18%)
Thrombocytopenia 0(0%) 1(3%)Transaminitis 1(3%) 5(15%)Menstrual Irregularity 7(19%) 8(23%)
Conclusion• We observed an earlier response in the low dose therapy (12
weeks) arm in contrast to the high dose arm (24 weeks)• At the end of 24 weeks, both low dose and high dose CYC
were able to produce a similar rate of complete response without significantly increasing the infection risk
• High dose had lower non-renal flares• High dose monthly CYC therapy was more effective in
reducing the prevalence of hypocomplimentemia and anti-dsDNA percentage positivity
• May be beneficial for higher and sustained renal remission and decrease renal relapses and disease flares
Limitations
• Small sample size that may be inadequate to detect the difference
• Single center study with single ethnicity • Not blinded (more actual clinical scenario than blinded
controlled trials)• Short duration of follow up, sustainability of the response
over the long term can not be predicted• In spite of randomization, the baseline mean renal SLEDAI
was higher in the high dose group vs low dose group, may be one confounding factor that resulted in early renal response in the low dose group
Future Perspectives
• Further studies investigating the kinetics of response to two weekly CYC administration vs monthly
• We may suggest another RCT that compared two weekly administration of 500 mg each for six months compared to monthly dose of 750 mg/m2 of CYC for 6 months
Thank you