Fred Steward: Innovation policy for sustainability - a new agenda
-
Upload
steps-centre -
Category
Education
-
view
1.029 -
download
1
Transcript of Fred Steward: Innovation policy for sustainability - a new agenda
Innovation policy for sustainability – a new agenda
Fred StewardProfessor of Innovation & Sustainability, Policy Studies Institute, Westminster University, London, UKUK-China Workshop, Beijing, March 2010
A shift in policy discourse
A shared acknowledgement that addressing sustainability implies radical change
New policy narratives from margin to mainstream in the last 10 years
‘Green revolution ‘Ecological transformation’ ‘Low carbon transition’
The limits of incrementalism
Greening of technology – incrementalism does deliver…but
Lock-in and narrow focus Relative improvements in resource use &
pollution impact eg: household appliances, cars, aeroplanes
Yet, environmental impact of household and personal transport continue to increase - the ‘rebound effect’
Transformative innovation – a new focus
Incremental innovation small innovations, or improvements to optimise existing systems of knowledge, e.g. reducing packaging waste;
Radical innovationpartial system redesigns, e.g. improvements in recycling which require innovations in product design and infrastructure for recycling;
Transformative innovation full system redesign and culture change in the way people think about products and services, e.g. industrial ecologies or life cycle approaches to product design.
UK Government
We must embrace a green revolution…in the way we live and work
Gordon Brown, 12 July 2009
UK Opposition
‘I want to lead a new green revolution…that brings forward the best technology’
David Cameron April 2006
United States of America
truly transform our economy …and save our planet from the ravages of climate change
Barack Obama 24 February 2009
Peoples Republic of China
A revolution in … technology…building an environment friendly society
Wen Jiabao October 2005
European Union
the European Union hopes to stimulate… the low
carbon revolution
Manuel Barroso 18 January 2007
Not simply at the rhetorical level
Change in policy landscape from climate change ‘problem’ to low carbon innovation ‘solution’
Incorporation of ambitious targets into national and transnational legal form
Driven by mix of global treaty obligations & local informed advocacy
Remains the basic trend of policy despite the new post- Copenhagen context
Carbon Budget targets
2050 – 80% less 2020 – 21% less than
2005 (min)
‘The challenge is not the technical feasibility of a low-carbon economy but making it happen’
China’s national strategy
National Climate Change programme Cut in CO2 emissions per unit of production
45% between 2005-2020 Mandatory target in mid & long term plan for
national economic and social development
In summary
A variety of national governments are incorporating carbon targets into their economic and social policies
The targets are highly ambitious given the national track records
Despite the setback for a new global treaty this represent a highly significant policy domain
The global challenge remains huge
Policy needs new ideas
The new consensus over the need for ‘revolutionary’ change precipitates a search for relevant ideas
One resource is the repertoire of historical analogies of episodes of ‘radical’ change
Another resource is the range of academic concepts on the dynamics of innovation and change
Historical analogies
Quite pervasive and powerful in contemporary discourse
Tend to reflect contrasting views on ‘statism’ and ‘individualism’
Tend to polarise between a focus on either ‘technological’ or ‘social’ innovation
4 narratives are quite common at present
Narrative 1: ‘big science’
Government has made big investments in key areas of science in the past – it should do so again
Popular analogies are the research programmes that led to nuclear weapons and human space travel
A new ‘Apollo’ programme
Martin Rees (President of the Royal Society)
A ‘global response analogous to the Apollo programme’
Editorial in Science, August 2006
Ambitious public investment in more R&D for new ‘far from market’ energy technologies
Conceptual roots
Linear science push model Innovation arises from radical breakthroughs
in basic science Largely abandoned by innovation
researchers though still a few advocates Still popular with some scientists
Narrative 2: ‘industrial revolution’
Low carbon transition is equivalent long term revolution in technology & economics
Forces driving it are structural in nature – new technologies, natural limits
Policy options are to facilitate national receptiveness and entrepreneurial opportunity
Influential advocates
Amory Lovins – US environmentalist & entrepreneur
Peter Mandelson, BIS Peter MacFadden
Conceptual roots
‘Technoeconomic paradigm – Freeman & Perez
Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of innovation
Ecological modernisation – Huber Influential among economic studies of
innovation Epochs defined by ‘lead technologies’
Narrative 3: ‘social reform’
Analogies with government led programmes of welfare reform from the 20th century eg Rooselvelt’s New Deal
Large scale state investment for societal purposes is possible
Conceptual roots
Traditional theories of state action for social purposes
Retheorised as social innovation and public innovation
Narrative 4: ‘moral crusade’
Analogies with ethical and moral crusades for reform
Wilberforce’s campaign for the Abolition of the Slave Trade, and Martin Luther King’s leadership of the Civil Rights movement are exemplars
Advocates
Head of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
No halfway house on moral principles
Carbon dependency moral equivalence
Rhetoric of reaction
James Hansen Leading climatologist
Marc Davison, University of Amsterdam
What do these narratives possess
Powerful narratives with influential advocates Recognise past periods of radical change Tend to inscribe established political
positions and guidelines Evocative of actual changes despite
problems
What do they lack
A model of how social and technological innovation interact with each other
New routes for global institutions to effectively interact with established institutions of national governance
Convincing approaches to the urgency of the climate change challenge
These are the key challenges for a new transformative discourse and innovation policy
Actually existing innovation policy
Turning to the real world of UK innovation policy there are interesting signs of change
The persistence of science push has begun to be displaced
NESTA played a key role in translating academic concepts about innovation into policy terms
The new innovation policy
Challenge ledDemand sideSocial as well as technologicalPublic and private actors Interactive networks
Sources
Interactive - Freeman, Rothwell SPRU User led – von Hippel Open – Chesbrough Actor networks – Callon, Latour Innovation commons – Lessig Sociotechnical transitions – Geels, Schot
Exemplars
Old
Atom bomb Concorde Double helix Penicillin
Science & corporate actors
New
The jeep Easyjet The internet Municipal systems
Public and entrepreneurial actors
A sustainability oriented innovation policy
Need for system innovation
Involves technology & social change
Crosses the production & consumption divide
The reintroduction of societal mission
New thinking
Needs a sociology of interactions An understanding of innovation as it is
situated in real social networks Policy remains dominated by a
society/individual duality expressed through economics and psychology
Opportunity
Policy advice remains dominated by economics (trading/tax) and psychology (behavioural change)
Diversity is increasingly recognised and the need for end use engagement
Transitions plan recognises different technologies and new initiatives on Community challenges recognises user enagement
Yet
Current interpretation of diversity favours the incumbents:
Off shore wind Carbon capture and storage Nuclear Electric car
‘silos’ or ‘networks’ ?
New systems need stronger voice
Small local waste into biogas Smart grids Micro generation Combined heat and power Multimodal transport – cycles to buses
The new system innovators
More likely to be:
municipal and regional actors infrastructural actors green entrepreneurs civil society third sector actors
The sources of variety Equal rights with the incumbents (at least)!
New capabilities needed
Understanding of systemic (not singular) innovation
‘Learning by doing’ - sociotechnical experiments
Framing goals in terms of societal outcomes rather than technical inputs
Promoting ’bottom up’ innovation to complement the ‘top down’ carbon market
Need for new interdisciplinary boundary spanning competences
A practice based approach
Is there an alternative to the economic incentive or psychological persuasion?
Yes… enactment, enrolment, performance in new social experiments