Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
of 128
-
Upload
michaelleeroberts -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
1/128
S
U
P
R
E
M
E
C
O
U
R
T
, S
T
A
TE
O
F C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
O
R
I
G
IN
A
L
P
R
O
C
E
E
D
IN
G
I
N
D
IS
C
I
PL
I
N
E
B
E
F
O
R
E
T
H
E
F
I
L
E
D
R
E
S
I
D
JNGDISCIPLNARYUDGF
1
3
0
0 B
r
o
ad
w
a
y,
S
u
it
e
2
5
0
N
2
2
5
D
e
nv
e
r,
C
ol
o
ra
do
8
02
0
3
E
S
I
D
IN
G
D
IS
I
PL
I
N
R
Y
J
uD
G
E
C
o
m
pl
a
in
an
t:
U
P
R
E
M
E
O
U
R
T
O
F
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
TH
E
P
E
O
PL
E
O
F
TH
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
C
O
L
O
R
A
D
O
O
U
R
T U
S
E
O
N
L
Y
A
R
e
sp
o
nd
e
n
t:
F
R
A
N
C
IS
C
O
E
. R
U
Y
B
A
L
D
I
V
1
8
4
48
C
as
e
N
um
b
e
r:
1
3
P
D
J0
6
5
(c
o
ns
o
li
da
te
d
w
i
th
E
r
in
R
.
K
r
is
to
f
co
,
33
1
0
0
1
4
P
D
J0
6
4
)
A
s
si
st
a
nt R
e
gu
la
ti
o
n
Co
u
n
se
l
James
C.
Coyle,
14970
R
e
g
ul
at
io
n C
o
un
s
el
A
tto
r
ne
y
s
fo
r
C
o
m
pl
a
in
an
t
1
3
0
0 B
ro
a
d
w
ay
, S
ui
te
5
0
0
D
e
n
ve
r,
C
o
lo
ra
d
o 8
02
0
3
T
e
le
ph
o
n
e: (3
0
3
)
9
2
8
-7
9
11
F
a
x
N
o.
: (
30
3
)5
0
1
-1
14
1
A
le
x
an
d
er
R
.
R
o
t
hr
o
ck
,
2
1
20
1
S
ar
a
V
a
n
D
e
u
se
n
,
3
8
73
5
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
s
C
o
un
s
el
B
u
m
s Fi
g
a
W
il
l,
P
C
6400
S
Fiddlers
Green Cir., Suite
1000
G
r
e
en
w
o
od
V
ill
ag
e
,
C
O
8
0
1
11
T
e
le
p
h
on
e
:
30
3
-7
9
6
-2
6
26
F
ax N
o
:
30
3
-7
9
6
-2
77
7
S
T
I
P
U
L
T
I
O
N
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
A
N
D
F
F
I
D
V
I
T
C
O
N
T
I
N
i
N
G T
H
E
R
E
SP
O
N
D
E
N
T
S
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
L
D
M
I
S
S
IO
N
M
I
S
O
N
D
U
T
O
n
d
a
y
o
f J
a
nu
a
ry
,
2
0
15
,
E
r
in
R
.
K
ri
st
of
co
,
A
ss
is
ta
n
t
R
eg
u
la
ti
on
C
o
u
n
se
l
a
nd
a
t
to
rn
e
y
f
or
th
e c
o
m
p
la
in
an
t
,
Francisco
Ruybalid,
IV,
the Respondent who
is
represented by
a
tt
o
rn
ey
s
A
le
x
an
d
er
R
.
R
o
th
ro
c
k
a
n
d
S
a
ra
V
an
D
e
us
e
n
in
t
he
s
e
pr
o
ce
e
di
n
gs
,
e
nt
er
i
n
to
t
he
f
ol
lo
w
in
g
S
ti
p
ul
at
io
n
,
A
g
re
em
en
t,
a
n
d
A
ff
id
a
vi
t
C
o
nt
ai
n
in
g
Re
s
po
n
d
en
t
s
C
o
n
di
tio
n
a
l
A
d
m
is
s
io
n
o
f M
is
co
n
d
uc
t
(
S
ti
p
ul
at
io
n
)
a
n
d
s
u
bm
it
th
e
s
a
m
e
to
th
e
P
r
es
id
in
g
D
is
ci
pl
in
a
ry
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
2/128
J
ud
g
e fo
r
h
is
c
on
s
id
er
a
tio
n
.
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
IO
N
Si
x
m
o
n
th
s
u
sp
e
ns
io
n
w
i
th
th
e r
e
qu
ir
e
m
en
t
of
r
ei
ns
ta
t
em
e
n
t
p
ur
su
a
n
t
t
o
C
R
C
P
2
51
2
9
c
an
d
d
,
al
l
st
ay
e
d
up
o
n
s
u
cc
e
ss
fu
l c
o
m
p
le
tio
n
o
f
a
tw
e
nt
y
..
s
ch
o
o
l, a
n
d
pa
y
m
e
nt o
f
c
o
st
s.
1
. T
h
e
R
e
sp
o
nd
e
n
t
h
as
ta
ke
n
an
d
su
b
sc
ri
b
ed
to
th
e
o
at
h
o
f
a
d
m
is
si
on
,
w
a
s
a
dm
itt
ed
to
th
e b
ar
o
f
th
is
C
o
u
rt o
n A
pr
il
2
7
, 1
9
8
9,
an
d
is
r
eg
i
st
er
ed
a
s a
n
at
to
rn
e
y
u
p
on th
e
o
ff
ic
ia
l
r
ec
o
rd
s o
f
th
is
C
o
u
rt
, re
gi
st
ra
ti
o
n
n
o
.
1
84
4
8
.
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t i
s
s
ub
je
c
t
t
o t
he ju
ri
sd
ic
ti
o
n
o
f
th
is
C
o
u
rt
an
d
th
e
P
r
es
id
i
ng
D
is
c
ip
li
na
ry
J
u
dg
e
in
t
h
es
e p
r
oc
e
ed
in
g
s
.
2
. R
e
s
po
n
d
en
t e
nt
er
s
in
to
t
hi
s S
tip
u
la
ti
o
n
f
re
e
ly
a
nd
vo
l
un
ta
r
ily
.
N
o
p
ro
m
is
e
s
ha
v
e
b
ee
n
m
a
de
c
o
nc
e
rn
in
g
fu
tu
re
co
n
si
d
er
at
io
n
, p
un
is
h
m
e
nt
,
o
r
l
en
i
en
c
e i
n
th
e
a
b
ov
e
-r
ef
e
re
nc
e
d
m
a
tte
r
It
is
R
e
sp
o
nd
e
n
ts
p
er
s
on
a
l d
e
ci
si
on
,
a
nd
R
es
p
on
d
en
t
a
ff
ir
m
s
t
h
er
e ha
s be
e
n
n
o
c
o
er
ci
o
n
o
r o
t
he
r in
ti
m
id
at
in
g
ac
ts
b
y a
n
y p
er
so
n o
r
a
ge
n
cy
c
on
c
er
n
in
g
th
is m
a
tt
e
r.
3
.
T
h
is
m
at
te
r
ha
s
b
ec
o
m
e
p
u
bl
ic
u
n
d
er
th
e
o
pe
r
at
io
n
of
C
R
C
P
2
5
1.
3
1
c
a
s
a
m
e
nd
e
d.
4
. R
e
s
po
n
d
en
t is
fa
m
il
ia
r
w
it
h
th
e
r
ul
e
s o
f
t
h
e C
o
l
or
ad
o
Su
p
re
m
e
C
o
u
rt
r
eg
a
rd
in
g
t
h
e
p
r
oc
e
du
r
e
f
or
d
is
ci
pl
in
e o
f
at
to
rn
e
y
s
a
n
d
w
it
h
th
e
ri
g
ht
s
p
ro
v
id
ed
b
y
th
os
e
r
ul
es
.
R
e
s
po
n
d
en
t
ac
k
no
w
l
ed
g
es
t
he
ri
gh
t
t
o
a
f
u
ll
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
le
te
ev
id
e
n
tia
r
y
h
e
a
rin
g
o
n
t
he
ab
o
v
e-
re
fe
r
en
c
ed
c
om
pl
ai
n
t.
A
t
an
y
su
c
h h
e
ar
in
g
, R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
w
o
u
ld
h
av
e
th
e
rig
h
t
t
o b
e
r
e
pr
es
e
nt
ed
b
y
c
o
un
s
el
,
p
re
s
en
t
ev
id
e
n
ce
,
ca
ll
w
it
ne
s
se
s,
a
n
d
cr
o
ss
-e
x
am
i
ne t
he
w
it
ne
s
se
s p
re
se
n
te
d
b
y
C
o
m
p
la
in
an
t
.
A
t
a
n
y
s
u
ch fo
r
m
al b
e
ar
in
g
,
C
o
m
p
la
in
an
t
w
ou
l
d
ha
v
e th
e
b
ur
d
en
o
f
p
r
oo
f
an
d
w
o
ul
d
be
r
e
qu
ir
e
d
t
o
p
ro
v
e t
h
e
c
h
a
rg
es c
o
n
ta
in
ed
i
n
th
e
c
o
m
p
la
in
t w
it
h
c
le
ar
a
n
d c
o
n
vi
nc
i
ng
ev
id
e
n
ce
.
N
on
e
th
el
e
ss
,
ha
v
in
g
fu
ll
kn
o
w
le
d
ge
o
f
th
e
rig
h
t
to
su
c
h
a
fo
rm
al
he
a
ri
ng
,
R
es
p
on
d
e
nt w
a
iv
e
s
th
a
t
rig
h
t.
5
.
R
es
p
on
d
en
t a
n
d
C
o
m
p
la
in
an
t
s
p
ec
if
ic
a
lly
w
a
iv
e
t
h
e
r
ig
h
t to
a
be
a
ri
ng
p
ur
su
a
n
t to
C
.R
.
C
.P
.
2
51
.2
2
c
1
.
6
.
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t h
a
s
r
ea
d
an
d
st
ud
i
ed
t
he
c
o
m
p
la
in
ts
in
13
P
D
J
06
5
an
d
1
4P
D
J
06
4
,
c
op
ie
s
o
f
w
hi
ch ar
e
at
ta
c
he
d
he
r
et
o
a
s
E
x
hi
bi
ts
A
a
nd
B
,
a
n
d
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
i
s
fa
m
i
lia
r
w
ith
th
e
al
le
ga
ti
o
ns t
he
re
i
n.
R
e
s
po
n
de
n
t
an
d
C
o
m
p
la
in
a
n
t
s
tip
u
la
te
t
o
th
e
fo
ll
ow
i
n
g
fa
c
ts
a
n
d
c
on
c
lu
s
io
ns
l
is
te
d i
n p
a
ra
g
ra
p
hs 7
t
o 2
5
3
b
e
lo
w
:
7
.
D
ur
in
g
a
ll
tim
es
r
e
le
va
n
t t
o
t
h
e
m
at
te
rs
d
i
sc
us
s
ed
b
e
lo
w
,
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t w
a
s a
nd
is
th
e el
ec
te
d
D
is
tr
ic
t
A
tt
or
n
ey
fo
r t
he
T
h
ir
d
Ju
d
ic
ia
l D
is
tri
c
t,
w
h
ic
h
i
nc
l
ud
e
s L
a
s
A
n
i
m
as
C
o
u
nt
y
a
nd H
ue
rf
a
no
C
o
un
t
y.
h
p
a
rt
ie
s s
p
n
t
s
e
ve
r
al da
y
s n
e
go
t
ia
tin
g
a
r
e
so
lu
ti
o
n
o
f
th
is
m
a
tt
er
a
f
te
r
m
e
di
a
tio
n
w
i
th
m
e
d
ia
to
r P
a
tr
ic
k
oo
ley
In
a
dd
i
tio
n
t
o m
a
n
y
o
th
e
r le
g
al
ac
c
om
p
l
is
hm
e
n
ts
M
r
T
o
o
le
y se
r
ve
s a
s
H
e
ar
in
g
P
a
ne
l m
e
m
b
e
r
in
di
sc
ip
l
in
ar
y
m
at
te
rs p
en
d
in
g
b
ef
or
e
th
e
P
r
es
id
in
g D
is
ci
p
lin
a
ry
J
u
dg
e
2
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
3/128
P
e
op
l
e
v
. S
c
o
tiA
K
ib
ii
t,
I1
C
R
1
9
R
h
i d
is
c
ip
li
na
r
y
c
o
m
pl
a
in
t
I3
P
D
J
O
6S
8.
O
n
D
e
c
em
be
r
20
,
2
01
1
,
R
es
p
o
nd
e
nt
f
il
ed
th
e
P
eo
p
le
s
C
om
pl
ai
nt
an
d
In
forrnation-Peop1e
v
-Scott AKibi
Las
AnimasCounty
i tit
uril
CR198
the
Kibiti
c
as
e
,
c
ha
r
gi
ng S
c
o
tt
A
l
le
n
K
i
b
itt
w
it
h S
ec
o
n
d
D
e
gr
ee
M
ur
d
er
, H
ea
t
of
P
as
si
o
n,
a
n
d
P
o
ss
e
ss
io
n
of a
W
e
a
po
n
b
y
a P
r
ev
io
u
s
O
f
fe
n
de
r.
9.
C
r
im
. P
.
1
6
l
a
1
IV
an
d
C
rim
.
P
.
1
6
l
bX
l
as p
u
bl
is
h
ed
i
n
2
0
1
1
re
qu
i
re
d
th
e
p
ro
s
ec
u
to
r
t
o m
a
k
e a
va
i
la
bl
e to
th
e
d
e
fe
ns
e
a
ll
b
oo
k
s
,
p
a
pe
rs
,
d
o
cu
m
e
nt
s,
p
h
ot
o
gr
ap
h
s
or
t
ai
ig
ib
l
e
ob
je
c
ts he
l
d
a
s
e
vi
de
n
ce
in c
on
n
e
ct
io
n
w
it
h
th
e
c
as
e
,
w
it
h
in
2
0
da
y
s
o
f
th
e
d
e
fe
nd
a
n
ts
f
ir
st ap
p
ea
r
an
c
e.
1
0.
T
h
e Pu
b
li
c D
e
f
en
d
er
,
P
a
tr
ic
k
M
cC
a
rv
i
lle
,
fi
le
d
c
er
ta
in
d
is
co
v
er
y
M
o
t
io
n
s.
Th
e
c
o
ur
t
h
el
d
a h
e
ar
in
g
on
F
e
b
ru
ar
y
1
5
,
2
01
2
,
du
r
in
g
w
h
ic
h
t
h
e
c
ou
r
t
or
d
er
ed
t
ha
t
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
p
r
ov
i
de th
e
de
fe
n
se w
ith
no
t
ic
e
n
o le
ss
th
a
n 7
2
h
ou
r
s
pr
io
r
t
o
an
y
b
a
lli
st
ic
o
r o
th
e
r
s
ci
en
ti
fi
c
expert tes ting
conducted
by the
Cifi
in
the
Kibitt
case.
Respondent
was
present for
t
h
e
e
nt
ir
e
h
e
ar
in
g
o
n
F
eb
r
ua
r
y
15
,
2
0
1
2.
1
1.
O
n
p
r
2
4
2
0
12
R
es
po
n
d
en
t
s
e
nt
a
L
et
te
r t
o
S
e
rg
e
a
nt
Sa
n
ti
st
ev
a
n
o
f
th
e
L
as
A
n
im
as
C
o
un
ty
Sh
e
ri
ff
s
O
f
fi
ce
,
w
h
er
ei
n
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
r
eq
u
e
st
ed
t
ha
t
t
h
e
Sh
e
ri
ff
s
O
f
fi
ce
e
x
pe
d
it
io
us
ly
se
n
d t
he
gu
n
a
n
d
o
th
er
e
v
id
en
c
e
in
c
lu
d
in
g
g
u
n
sh
o
t
re
si
du
e r
ec
e
pt
ac
l
es
,
bl
oo
d
sa
m
p
le
s
,
an
d
s
he
ll
c
as
in
g
s
t
o
th
e
C
B
I f
o
r la
b
or
a
to
ry
a
nd
fo
r
en
s
ic
t
es
ti
ng
.
1
2
.
T
he
A
p
ril
2
4
,
20
1
2 le
tte
r
fro
m
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
t
o
S
e
rg
e
an
t
S
a
n
tis
te
v
an
d
oe
s
n
ot
r
eq
u
e
st th
a
t
th
e
Sh
e
ri
ff
s
O
ff
ic
e
o
r
t
he
C
B
I
pr
o
vi
de
a
n
y
p
rio
r
n
o
tic
e
o
f
te
s
tin
g
,
n
o
r
d
oe
s
it
m
e
n
ti
on
t
he co
u
rt
s o
r
de
r
r
eq
u
ir
in
g t
ha
t
t
h
e
d
e
fe
ns
e
b
e g
iv
e
n
7
2
h
o
u
rs
n
o
tic
e
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
fe
n
se
p
rio
r
t
o
an
y te
st
in
g.
13
.
R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
re
c
ei
v
ed
a
co
p
y
o
f a
l
et
te
r
d
at
ed
M
ay 4
,
20
1
2
,
f
ro
m
S
e
rg
e
a
nt
S
a
nt
is
te
v
an
t
o
C
B
I re
q
ue
s
ti
ng
f
or
e
ns
ic
t
es
ti
ng
on
th
e
K
i
bi
tt
ca
s
e
e
v
id
e
nc
e
. R
e
s
po
n
d
en
t
re
ce
iv
e
d
a
co
p
y o
f
th
e C
B
I
ev
id
e
n
ce
c
ha
in
o
f c
us
to
d
y
fo
rm
,
f
ill
ed
o
u
t
by
Se
r
ge
a
nt
S
a
n
ti
st
ev
a
n
a
nd
t
he
C
B
L
1
4
.
O
n
M
ay 17
,2
0
1
2,
R
e
sp
o
nd
e
nt
r
ec
e
iv
ed
a re
p
or
t
f
ro
m
S
er
ge
a
n
t
Sa
n
ti
st
ev
a
n
w
h
ic
h
in
di
c
at
ed
t
he C
B
I
w
o
u
ld
b
e
d
oi
ng
te
st
in
g
on
th
e
f
ire
a
rm
.
1
5
.
A
t
a
h
e
a
rin
g
o
n M
ay
3
0
,
2
0
12
, t
he
c
ou
r
t
ag
a
in
r
ai
se
d
t
h
e
i
ss
u
e
of
C
B
I
fo
r
en
s
ic
te
s
tin
g
a
n
d
t
he fa
c
t
th
at
th
e
c
o
u
rt
h
a
d
al
re
a
dy
g
r
an
t
ed
d
e
fe
n
da
n
t
s
m
ot
io
n
re
q
u
es
ti
ng
72
h
o
ur
s
n
o
ti
ce
p
r
io
r
to
a
n
y
te
st
in
g
.
16
.
R
e
s
po
n
d
en
t
a
d
m
it
te
d
on
t
he r
ec
o
rd
:
th
i
nk
I f
o
rg
o
t
a
bo
u
t
th
e
7
2
h
o
u
rs
T
h
e
c
o
ur
t
s
pe
c
if
ic
al
ly r
ec
o
m
m
e
nd
e
d
th
a
t
Re
s
po
n
d
en
t
c
a
ll t
he
C
B
I a
g
ai
n
t
o
t
el
l t
he
m
ab
o
ut
th
e
co
u
rt
s
o
r
de
r
. R
e
sp
o
n
de
n
t
s
ta
te
d
t
o t
c
ou
r
t th
a
t
h
e
w
ou
ld
do
so
.
Re
s
po
n
d
en
t
th
e
n
a
g
re
ed
o
n
t
he
re
c
o
rd
,
O
k
a
y
.
A
l
l
rig
h
t.
W
e
ll
w
h
e
n
ev
e
r
t
he
y
r
e
g
o
in
g
to
d
o
th
e te
st
,
I
ll g
iv
e
[
pu
b
li
c
d
ef
en
d
er
]
72
h
ou
r
s
no
t
ic
e.
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
4/128
17
.
On M
ay
30, 2
01
2, Res
po
nde
nt
ca
lled
a C
BI
emp
loy
ee,
S
ean
We
st, reg
ard
ing
the
test
ing in
the
K
ibi
tt
c
ase
. Res
pon
den
t m
ade
n
o
m
en
tion t
o M
r.
W
es
t
o
f th
e or
der f
or 7
2 ho
urs
no
tice
p
rior
t
o
tes
ting
.
18
. O
n
J
une
6
, 2
012
,
R
es
pon
den
t
r
ece
ive
d
a
rep
ort
f
rom Serg
ea
nt
S
an
tiste
van
wi
th
a
n
atta
che
d
fax
f
rom
the
C
BI
.
Th
e
Ju
ne
6,
20
12
rep
ort
and
att
ach
ed fa
x
sta
ted
th
at th
e C
BI
h
ad
the
Kib
iu
ev
ide
nce in
its p
oss
ess i
on fo
r
c
om
ple
tion
o
f
ana
lys
is.
19.
O
n J
une
2
5,
20
12
, R
esp
ond
ent re
ceiv
ed
a
re
por
t fro
m S
heri
ff Off
ice r
Nav
are
tte
s
tati
ng tha
t
th
e
C
BI
we
apo
n te
stin
g
re
sul
ts re
gar
din
g
t
he
Ki
bitt
ca
se
had b
ee
n rec
eiv
ed. T
he
C
BI
w
ea
pon
t
esti
ng
repo
rt
is dat
ed
Jun
e
2
1.
Re
spo
nde
nt rec
eive
d
a
C
BI
la
bor
ator
y
tes
ting r
epo
rt
da
ted
Ju
ly
16
,
2
012
,
co
nta
inin
g
the
r
esu
lts of
bl
ood
and
st
ain
tes
ting
per
form
ed o
n M
r.
K
ibi
tts
gu
n. R
esp
ond
ent
s
tate
d
t
o
O
ffic
e
o
f
At
torn
ey
R
egu
lat
ion
Inv
esti
ga t
ors, t
he r
esu
lts
o
f
th
e
fo
ren
sic
te
stin
g
des
crib
ed in
th
e
pre
ced
ing
sec
tion
w
ere
an e
vid
enti
ary
triu
mp
h for
the
de
fen
se.
20. On
August
15,
2012, Respondent
filed a
Notice
of
Additional Discovery,
which
inc
lud
ed t
he re
sul
ts
of
t
he CB
I te
sti
ng.
A
t
a
h
ear
ing o
n
Au
gu
st 21
, 20
12, t
he
Pu
blic
De
fen
der
mad
e
a
n
o
ral
m
otio
n f
or san
ctio
ns a
gai
nst Re
spo
nde
nt
fo
r
d
isco
ve
ry
v
iola
tion
s,
n
otin
g
th
at
R
esp
on
den
t
ha
d
viol
ate
d
th
c
our
ts or
der
b
y fai
ling
to
giv
e
the
d
efe
nse
72
hou
rs not
ice
p
rior
to
test
ing
.
21.
O
n O
cto
be
r
16
,
2
012
,
Re
spo
nde
nt
file
d a
m
oti
on
to
d
ism
iss th
e
cas
e aga
inst Sc
ott
A.
K
ibit
t.
22
.
Th
e co
urt
gra
nted
th
e mo
tio
n,
a
nd
iss
ued
a
s
anc
tio
ns
ord
er
o
n Oct
obe
r
16
,
201
2,
23
. C
rim
. P.
16
IXb
4
r
equ
ires Re
spo
nde
nt
to
ens
ure
t
hat a
f
low
of in
for
ma
tion
is
maintained
betwe
en
th
e
i
nve
stig
ati
ve
pe
rson
ne
l and R
esp
on
den
ts
offi
ce, su
ffic
ien
t
to
pla
ce
all
ma
teri
al a
nd in
for
mat
ion
rel
eva
nt
to
th
e
a
ccu
sed in
Res
pon
de
nts pos
sess
ion
.
24.
Re
spo
nd
ent
d
id
not
pr
ovi
de
the
def
ens
e
w
ith h
is e
xp
erts
cu
rr ic
ula
v
itae
,
a
s
req
uir
ed
by
the
di
stri
ct co
urt
s
o
rde
r.
2
5.
Res
pon
de
nt
di
d n
ot com
ply
wit
h
Cr
im.
P.
1
6 T
an
d 16
V
ma
nda
tor
y,
a
uto
ma
tic
dis
clos
ure pro
vis
ions
.
R
esp
ond
ent
d
id
not
pro
vid
e a l
ist
o
f
tri
al
ex
hib
its to t
he de
fen
se
as
t
he
c
our
t
h
ad
o
rde
red .
26. Res
pon
den
t
d
id
not
p
rov
ide
the
d
efe
nse
w
ith
the
re
qui
red
exp
ert d
isc
los
ures
,
a
s
o
rdered by
the court.
Respondent
did
not
inform
the Sheriffs Office
or
the CBI
that
the
defense
sh
oul
d
b
e
giv
en
7
2
h
ou
rs no
tic
e
pri
or
to
any
tes
ting
,
a
nd a
llow
ed
t
he t
es ti
ng
to
oc
cur w
itho
ut
an
y
p
rior
n
otic
e
to
the
d
efen
se.
2
7.
By
h
is con
duc
t d
esc
rib
ed ab
ov
e, Re
spo
nde
nt
d
id no
t dili
gen
tly
rep
rese
nt
t
he
P
eop
le
i
n
vio
latio
n
o
f
ob
RPC
1
.3, an
d en
gag
ed
in
c
ond
uc
t
pre
jud
icia
l
to th
e
adm
in
istr
atio
n
o
f
ju
sti
in
v
iol
atio
n
o
f
o
b
RPC
8.4
d
.
4
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
5/128
Peo
ple v
Je
rem
y
Li
con
1
0C
R1
54
i
n
dis
cip
lina
ry
c
om
pla
int
13P
DJ
065
2
8.
Je
rem
y
Lic
on
wa
s arre
ste
d
o
n Se
ptem
be
r
3
0,
20
10
fo
r d
ome
stic
viol
enc
e
a
nd
trespass.
Oa-October--7,
20l0Respondentproduced to
the
defense
a
64-page-
Trinidid
Plice
De
par
tm
ent
i
nve
stig
atio
n
re
por
t,
inc
lud
ing
fo
ur
c
olo
r ph
oto
s a
nd
rep
ort
s
co
nta
inin
g
M
r.
Li
con
s
h
isto
ry
o
f
dru
g ab
use
a
nd
d
om
est
ic
vio
lenc
e.
29.
O
n O
cto
ber
21
,
201
0,
Res
pon
de
nts
A
ssi
stan
t
Di
stri
ct
Att
orn
ey,
C
lay
M
eK
isso
n,
f
iled
a
C
om
pla
in t an
d In
fon
nat
ion,
P
eo
ple
Jere
my
L
ico
n,
Las
A
nim
as
Co
unt
y
D
istr
ict
co
urt
,
1
0C
R
1
54
th
e
Lic
on
cas
e ,
a
gai
nst
M
r.
Lic
on
f
or
Firs
t
D
egr
ee
C
rim
inal
Tr
esp
ass
,
The
ft,
C
rim
inal
M
isc
hie
f;
a
nd
C
ons
pira
cy
to
Com
m
it T
hef
t.
3
0.
O
n
N
ove
mb
er
1
6,
2
01
0,
and N
ove
mb
er
2
3,
2
010
, R
esp
ond
ent
f
iled
No
tice
s
o
f
A
dd
itio
nal
D
isc
ove
ry,
li
stin
g fo
ur
a
ddit
ion
al
p
age
s of
a
law
enf
orce
me
nt
i
nve
stig
ati
on
rep
ort
,
the
T
rin
idad
P
oli
ce D
epa
rtm
ent
Su
pp
lem
ent
al
Re
por
t, a
nd
in
cid
ent r
epo
rts
reg
ard
ing
Mr
. Li
con
fro
m
the Raton Po lice Department
in
New
Mexico.
3
1.
The inve
sti
gati
on
rep
ort
s st
ate
d
tha
t
law
en
for
cem
en
t
had
c
oll
ecte
d
ev
ide
nce
r
ega
rdi
ng
M
r.
L
ico
n, in
clu
din
g
ph
otog
rap
hs
of
th
e cr
ime
sc
ene
,
pho
tos
of
M
r.
L
ico
n
o
n
C
D,
rec
ord
ed int
ervi
ew
s o
f
M
r. Lic
on
an
d the
vi
ctim
,
Jes
sica
Ge
rard
o,
a
nd
bu
cca
l
sw
ab
s
fr
om
M
r.
Li
con
.
32
. U
nde
r
C
rim
.
P.
16
I
a 1
I
,
au
tom
ati
c
dis
clos
ure
by th
e
pro
secu
tin
g
att
orn
ey
of
all witn
ess
s
tat
eme
nts
is re
qui
red
,
whe
the
r
o
r
no
t
the
d
efe
nse
r
equ
ests the
m.
R
espo
nd
en t
fa
iled
to
pro
du
ce
to
th
e
def
ens
e
e
vide
nce
i
n
th
e
L
icon
c
ase
, incl
udi
ng
ph
oto
gra
phs
of t
he
c
rim
e
sc
ene
,
ph
oto
s o
f M
r. Lic
on
on
CD
, re
cor
ded
inte
rvi
ews
of
Mr.
Li
con
an
d th
e
v
icti
m,
Jes
sic
a
G
era
rdo
,
an
d b
ucc
al
s
wa
bs
from
M
r.
L
icon
.
33
.
O
n Feb
rua
ry
29
20
12
def
ens
e cou
ns
el
file
d
a
M
oti
on
f
or S
anc
tion
s
for
V
iol
atio
n
o
f
Cr
iin.
P. 16.
The
M
otio
n
a
lle
ged
th
at
Res
pon
de
nt
vi
ola t
ed
C
rim
. P
. 16
be
cau
se
he
had
n
eve
r
p
rod
uce
d
the
ab
ov
e
ev
iden
ce
in di
sco
very
,
as is
req
uire
d
by th
e C
rim
.
P
.
1
6 I
b
1
m
an
dat
ory
auto
ma
tic
d
isc
losu
re
req
uir
em
ent.
3
4.
B
ase
d
on R
es
pon
den
ts
fai
lure
to
di
sclo
se
e
vid
enc
e
o
ver
a p
erio
d
o
f 1
7
m
on
ths,
the
d
efen
se req
ues
ted
a
s
a s
anc
tion
th
at
the
cas
e
b
e
dis
mis
sed
, o
r
tha
t the
a
bov
e-l
iste
d
e
vid
enc
e
b
e e
xclu
ded
from tria
l.
A
hea
ring
on
the
M
otio
n
for
S
anc
tion
s
w
as
se
t
fo
r
Ma
rch
2
3 2
012
.
35
.
Im
me
dia
tely
pr
ior
to
t
he he
arin
g,
R
esp
ond
en
t
fil
ed
a
mo
tio
n t
o
dism
iss
t
he
c
ase
a
gai
nst
M
r.
L
ico
n.
T
he
co
urt g
ran
ted
th
e
mo
tion
to
dis
mis
s.
3
6.
R
esp
ond
ent
did
n
ot de
term
in
e
wh
at ev
iden
ce
sh
oul
d
be
d
isc
los
ed
t
o t
he
def
ense
d
urin
g
d
isco
ver
y
in
the
Li
con c
ase
.
Re
spo
nde
nt
d
id
no
t m
ak
e
ap
pro
pri
ate
a
nd
ti
me
ly
dis
clos
ure
s
to th
e
def
ens
e i
n th
e
L
ico
n
cas
e.
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
6/128
3
7.
B
y h
is
co
nd
uct
d
esc
ribe
d
a
bo
ve,
R
esp
ond
ent
did
n
ot
d
ilig
ent
ly
re
pre
sen
t
th
e
Pe
ople
in
vio
latio
n
o
fC
o
b
R
PC
1.3
, and
en
gag
ed
in con
du
ct
p
rej
ud i
cial
t
o
t
h
ad
mi
nist
rati
on
o
f
j
usti
i
n v
iola
tion
o
f
C
o
b
RP
C
8
.4 d
.
38
.
O
n
Sep
tem
ber
1
7,
201
2,
D
efe
nd
ant
C
ast
ore
na
wa
s
ar
res
ted
for
the
ft.
Lat
er
th
at
d
ay,
R
esp
ond
ent
r
ece
ived
a
pol
ice
re
po
rt
w
hic
h
sta
ted
tha
t t
he
T
rini
dad
P
oli
ce
D
epa
rtm
ent
h
ad
b
een
c
alle
d
b
y a
Wa
lma
rt
sto
re
re
ga
rdin
g
a the
ft, al
leg
edly
com
mi
tted
b
y C
ast
oren
a.
39
. T
he
po
lice
re
por
t
sen
t
to
Res
pon
den
t
d
iscu
sse
d
Wa
lma
rts
surv
eil
lanc
e
s
yst
em
a
nd
ind
ica
ted
that
O
ffic
er
L
eP
latt
o
f
the
Tr
inid
ad
Po
lic
e D
epa
rtm
en
t
ha
d
vi
ew
ed th
e
sur
vei
llan
ce
vide
os.
Th
e
su
rve
illan
ce
vid
eo
cam
er
as
h
ad
rec
ord
ed
def
end
ant
Ca
stor
ena
s
tea
ling
f
ive
iPa
ds,
an
d
con
cea
lin
g
t
hem
i
n a
n
air
ma
ttre
ss
b
ox.
40
.
Th
e
W
alm
ar
t s
ecu
rity
per
son
nel
,
and
of
fice
rs
o
f
th
e T
rini
dad
Pol
ice
Dep
art
men
t,
were
able to
view Mr. Castorenas
identification card
and
confirm ed
the
person
in
the
Walmart
v
ide
o
wa
s
the d
efen
da
nt,
Mr
.
Cas
tor
ena
.
41
.
Re
spo
nde
nt
re
ceiv
ed
an
othe
r
po
lic
e
re
por
t da
ted
S
ept
emb
er
18
,
20
12.
The
rep
ort
n
ote
d re
lev
ant
ev
iden
ce
in
clud
ing
t
wo
c
omp
act
di
scs
con
tain
ing
vi
deo
su
rve
illan
ce
o
f the
cr
ime
al
lege
dly c
om
mi
tted
by
d
efe
nda
nt
C
ast
ore
na .
4
2.
O
n
S
ept
emb
er
2
5,
2
012
,
Re
spo
nde
nt
file
d
a
C
om
pla
int
an
d
I
nfo
rma
tion
aga
ins
t
D
ef
end
ant
,
Peo
ple
Vi
ctor
Fo
sse
n
C
as
tore
na ,
L
as A
nim
as
Co
unt
y
Dis
tric
t
C
our
t,
12
CR1
92
the
Cas
tor
ena ca
se
.
4
3.
Re
spo
nde
nt
did
no
t
re
que
st
a cop
y fro
m
t
he
Tr
inid
ad
Po
lic
e D
ep
artm
en
t
o
f
t
he
surveillance
video
of
Mr. Castorena stealing the five
IPads.
Respondent did
not
comply
wi
th
Cr
im.
P.
16
IX
bX
4
whi
ch re
qui
red
R
es
pon
den
t
to
ens
ure
th
at
a
flow
o
f
in
for
mat
ion
is
m
ain
tain
ed
bet
wee
n
th
e
inv
est
iga
tive
per
son
nel
an
d
Res
pon
de
nts
off
ice
, s
uff
icie
nt
to
pla
ce
a
ll
m
ater
ial
an
d
in
form
at
ion
r
ele
van
t
to
the
a
ccu
sed
i
n
Re
spo
nde
nts
po
sses
sio
n.
4
4.
Re
spo
nde
nt
d
id
n
ot
tim
ely ma
ke
ava
ilab
le
th
e W
alm
ar
t
sur
veil
lan
ce
C
l
to
the
de
fen
se
c
oun
sel,
a
s
is
req
uire
d
u
nde
r
Cri
m.
P
.
16
IX
bX
I
m
and
ato
ry,
au
tom
ati
c
d
iscl
osu
res.
45
.
A
t a di
spo
sitio
na
l
he
ari
ng
o
n N
ov
emb
er
7
,
2
012
,
t
he
pu
blic
de
fen
der
re
qu
este
d
a
co
py
o
f
the
Wa
lma
rt
v
ide
o
s
urv
eill
anc
e
C
D.
At th
e
hea
ring
,
the
cou
rt no
ted
that
fa
ilur
e
to
p
rod
uc
e
th
e
CD
w
as a
vio
lati
on
o
fCri
m.
P
.
16
1
a
nd
16
V
man
dat
ory
,
aut
om
atic
d
isc
losu
res
.
4
6.
T
he
c
ourt
o
rde
red
t
h
at
R
esp
ond
ent
m
ust
pro
du
ce
th
e
W
al
mar
t
s
urv
eill
anc
e
vi
deo
s
to
th
e
defe
nse p
rio
r
to
N
ove
mb
er
28,
20
12 .
Res
pon
den
t
a
ssu
red
the
co
urt h
e
w
oul
d
ge
t t
he
C
D
to
t
he
de
fen
se
w
ith
in
tw
o
w
ee
ks, an
d
pr io
r
to
the n
ex t
h
ear
ing
set
for
No
vem
ber
2
8,
201
2.
4
7.
O
n
N
ov
em
ber
7,
201
2,
R
es
pon
den
t
m
ail
ed
a lette
r
to
th
e
Tr
inid
ad
Pol
ice
Dep
art
men
t
req
ues
ting
fo
r
the
f
irst
tim
e
a
co
py of
th
e W
alm
ar
t
s
urv
eill
anc
e
CD
.
6
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
7/128
48.
A
t
the
he
arin
g
o
n
No
ve
mbe
r
28,
201
2,
the
pu
blic
d
efe
nde
r
s
tate
d
h
e
ha
d
not
ye
t
re
ceiv
ed
t
he su
rve
illa
nce
CD
, a
nd
he
m
ad
e
a
n o
ral
mo
tion
f
or
dis
cov
ery
sa
ncti
ons
ag
ain
st
Re
spo
nde
nt.
49.
On
Nov
em
ber
2
9, 2
01
2,
the
cou
rt
is
sue
d
a
w
ritte
n
o
rder
g
ran
ting
the
def
ens
e
cou
nse
ls req
ues
t
for
s
anc
tion
s.
Th
e
cou
rt
ba
rred
R
esp
ond
ent
from
off
erin
g t
he
Wa
lm
art
sur
vei
llan
ce
C
D into
ev
iden
ce
a
t
tr
ial,
and
n
o wit
nes
s
co
uld
men
tio
n
t
he
s
urv
eill
anc
e
vid
eos
.
A
note
in
R
esp
ond
en
ts
ca
se fil
e
ind
icat
es
the
Tr
inid
ad
Pol
ice
D
ep
artm
en
t
sen
t
Re
spo
nd
ent
t
he
sur
vei
llan
ce Cl
on
N
ov
em
ber
2
9 2
012
.
50.
On Dec
em
ber
4,
201
2,
the
P
ubl
ic
Def
end
er
p
ick
ed
up
th
e
vid
eos
from
t
he
Dis
tric
t
At
torn
ey
s
O
ffic
e.
O
n
De
cem
ber
12
,
20
12
,
the c
our
t
s
et
the
ca
se
f
or
a
ju
ry
t
rial
,
to be
gin
M
ay
21
201
3.
A
t a
di
spo
siti
ona
l
hea
ring
on
Fe
bru
ary
1
3,
20
13,
R
es
pon
den
t
m
ad
e
an
ora
l mo
tio
n
t
o
dis
mi
ss th
e
cas
e.
51.
Respondent stated
in
open
court
that
his
reason for dismissal was
that
the
surv
eil
lanc
e
v
ide
os
w
ere
the
co
rne
rsto
ne
o
f
the c
ase
,
an
d
the
dis
cov
ery
s
anc
tion
s
upp
res
sin
g
the
su
rvei
llan
ce
vide
o m
ad
e
i
t
i
mp
oss
ible
f
or hi
m
to
p
rov
e hi
s
cas
e
ag
ains
t
D
efe
nda
nt
C
as
tore
na.
The
cou
rt
is
sue
d a
m
inu
te
o
rde
r
a
pp
rovi
ng
the
d
ism
issa
l.
52
. R
es
pon
den
t
did
no
t
get
a
cop
y
th
e W
al
ma
rt
surv
eil
lanc
e
CD
fro
m
law
e
nfo
rce
me
nt
in
a tim e
ly
m
ann
er.
R
es
pon
den
t
did
no t
d
eter
min
e
wh
at
e
vid
enc
e
sho
uld
b
e
d
isc
lose
d
to t
he de
fen
se
du
rin
g d
isco
ver
y
in
t
he
Ca
sto
rena
c
ase
.
53.
Re
spo
nde
nt did
n
ot
en
sur
e
t
hat
a
flo
w
i
nfo
rma
tio
n
wa
s
ma
inta
ine
d
bet
wee
n
th
e
inv
est
iga
tive
per
son
nel
and
R
esp
ond
ent
s
o
ffic
e,
su
ffic
ien
t
to
p
lac
e
al
l m
ate r
ial
a
nd
inf
orm
atio
n
r
ele
van
t
to
th
e ac
cus
ed
in
Re
spo
nd
ent
s
p
oss
ess
ion
,
as
is
r
equ
ired
b
y C
rim
. P
.
1
6W
b
4.
54.
Re
spo
nd
ent
did no
t
m
ake
ap
pro
pria
te
an
d tim
el
y
di
sclo
sur
es
to
th
e
d
efe
nse
in t
he
Ca
sto
rena
c
ase
.
Re
spo
nde
nt
d
id
no
t co
mp
ly
w
ith
Cri
m.
P.
16
l b
1
a
nd
1
6 V
in
th
e
C
asto
ren
a cas
e.
55.
As
a
re
sul
t,
t
he
res
olu
tion
th
e C
as
tore
na
ca
se
w
as
s
ubs
tant
iall
y
del
aye
d.
56
.
By
h
is
c
on
duc
t
des
crib
ed
ab
ove
,
R
esp
ond
en
t
d
id
not d
ilig
ent
ly
re
pres
ent
t
he
Pe
opl
e
in
v
iola
tio
n o
f
Co
b.
RP
C 1
3
a
nd
eng
age
d
in con
du
ct
pr
ejud
ici
al
to
the
ad
min
ist
rati
on
jus
tice
in v
iol
atio
n
o
f
Co
b. R
PC
8
.4 d
.
opl
v
Jo
sep
h
R
od
rigu
ez,
12
CR2
42
in
d
isciplinary complaint
13PD3065
57
.
O
n
D
ece
mbe
r
1
4,2
012
,
Res
pon
de
nt
file
d
a
Co
mpl
ain
t
a
nd
I
nfo
rma
tion
,
P
eop
le
v
Jos
eph
R
odr
igu
ez,
L
as
A
nim
as
C
ou
nty
Di
stri
ct C
our
t,
1
2C
R24
2
th
e
Ro
drig
uez
cas
e
, a
gain
st
d
efe
nda
nt
Ro
dri
gue
z
for
A
gg
rav
ated
R
ob
ber
y.
C
rim
ina
l
At
tem
pt
to
Co
mm
it
Agg
rav
ate
d
Rob
be
ry,
Th
eft
a
nd
Me
nac
ing
.
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
8/128
58.
R
esp
ond
ent
did
n
ot
com
ply
w
ith the
m
an
dato
ry,
a
uto
ma
tic d
isc l
osu
res
r
equ
ire
d
by
C
rim
.
P. 1
64J
b
1
and
16
V ,
by f
aili
ng
to
m
ake
av
aila
ble
to th
e
d
efe
nda
nt,
wi
tne
ss
s
tate
men
ts,
911
rec
ord
ing
s,
20
12
po
lice
r
epo
rts
,
rec
ord
ed
inte
rvie
ws
pro
sec
utio
n
w
itne
sse
s,
a
nd
cri
min
al
h
ist
orie
s
fo
r
cert
ain
pro
secu
tio
n
wit
nes
ses
.
5
9. O
n M
arc
h
2
6
201
3,
de
fen
se
co
uns
el
file
d
a
M
ot
ion
fo
r S
anc
tion
s
for
Dis
cov
ery
V
iola
tion
s.
Re
spo
nde
nt
then
pro
duc
ed
som
e
of
t
he m
and
ato
ry
dis
clo
sure
s
to
th
e
d
efe
nse
.
6
0.
On
M
ay
2
2,
2
013
,
the
def
ens
e
fil
ed
an
am
end
ed
M
otio
n
to D
ism
iss
As
Sa
ncti
on
for
D
isco
ver
y
V
iola
tion
s.
61
. O
n
M
ay
24
,
2
01
3, D
istr
ict
Cou
rt
Jud
ge
A
ppe
l
h
eld
a
h
ear
ing
o
n th
e
pen
din
g
Mo
tion
a
nd
A
me
nde
d
M
oti
on
to Di
smi
ss
A
s S
anc
tion
f
or Di
sco
ver
y
V
iol
atio
ns.
62
. J
udg
e A
pp
el
not
ed
tha
t
R
esp
ond
ent
h
ad
o
nly
re
cen
tly
pro
du
ced
to
def
ens
e
89
p
age
s
of ne
w
d
isco
ver
y,
an
d
a
n
ad
diti
ona
l
CD
wi
th
9
11
reco
rdi
ngs
.
Re
spo
nd
ent
w
as
ord
ered
to
flie
any response
to
the
Amended
Motion
to Dismiss
by
June
10,
2013.
6
3.
Th
e
cou
rt
re
set
the
hea
ring
o
n
the
def
ens
es
A
m
end
ed
M
oti
on
to
Dis
mi
ss
and
M
otio
n
for S
anc
tion
s
to
A
ugu
st
9
,
2
01
3.
P
rio
r t
o
a
ny r
ulin
g
on
the
d
efen
dan
ts
M
oti
on
for
S
an
ctio
ns,
Res
po
nde
nt
ag
reed
to
a
p
lea
d
eal
w
ith
d
efe
nda
nt
Rod
rig
uez
.
Re
spo
nd
ent
a
me
nde
d
t
he
Peo
ple
s
c
om
pla
int,
dro
pp
ing
all
f
elo
ny
cha
rge
s,
and
c
har
gin
g
Mr
.
Ro
driq
uez
wit
h
m
isd
eme
ano
r
th
eft
on
ly.
D
ef
end
ant
R
odr
igue
z
ple
d
gui
lty
t
o
the
a
me
nde
d c
om
pla
int
for
mi
sde
me
ano
r
th
eft.
64.
Re
spo
nde
nt
did
n
ot t
ime
ly
w
atc
h
p
olic
e
vi
deo
tap
es
of w
itn
ess
i
nte
rvie
ws
,
wh
ich
w
ere
in his
po
sses
sio
n,
a
nd
w
hic
h w
ere
pote
nti
ally
ex
cul
pato
ry
e
vid
enc
e
in Peo
ple
v
.
J
ose
ph
Ro
drig
uez 12
CR
242
.
6
5. R
es
pon
den
t
did
n
ot
tim
el
y d
ete
rm
ine
wh
at
e
vid
enc
e
sh
oul
d b
e
dis
clo
sed
to
th
e
de
fen
se
d
urin
g
d
isc
ove
ry
in
t
he
Ro
dri
gue
z
case
.
R
es
pon
den
t
did
not
tim
ely
m
ake
ap
pro
pria
te
an
d
tim
ely
disc
los
ure
s
to
th
e d
efen
se
in
the
Rod
rig
uez
cas
e,
inc
ludi
ng
911
reco
rdi
ngs
,
w
itne
ss
sta
tem
ent
s,
Dec
em
ber
201
2
p
oli
ce
re
por
ts;
5
CD rec
ord
ing
s
in
ter
view
s
co
ndu
cted
w
ith
pro
sec
utio
n wit
nes
ses,
and
cr
imi
nal
hi
stor
ies
fo
ur
pr
ose
cut
ion
witn
ess
es.
66
. Re
spo
nde
nt
di
d n
ot co
mp
ly
with
Cri
m.
P.
1
6 1
an
d
16
V
ma
nda
tor
y,
a
uto
ma
tic
d
isc
losu
re
p
rov
isio
ns,
wh
ich
cau
sed
the
c
our
t
to
se
t hea
rin
gs
re
gar
din
g
dis
cov
ery
,
the
cas
e
to
ext
end
pa
st
th
e
de
fend
an
ts
sta t
utor
y
spe
edy
tri
al
da
te,
a
nd
th
e
co
urt
t
o
hav
e
to
c
ont
inu
e
th
e
tr
ial
dat
e.
67
.
B
y
h
is
co
ndu
ct
de
scr
ibe
d
abo
ve,
R
esp
ond
ent
did
no
t
dil
igen
tly
r
epr
ese
nt
t
he
Pe
opl
e in vio
lati
on
o
fC
ob
RP
C
1.3
,
and e
nga
ged
in
con
du
ct p
rej
ud i
cial
to
the
ad
min
istr
atio
n
o
f
ju
stic
e
in
vio
lat
ion
of
Co
b
R
PC
8
.4
d .
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
9/128
Pe
op
le
v
ico
leN
un
ez
1
3CR
27
in
dis
cipl
ina
ry
com
pla
int
1
4PD
J0
64
68.
On
F
eb
ruar
y
82
013
R
esp
on
den
t
f
lied
a
C
om
pla
int a
nd
I
nfo
rma
tio
n
ag
ain
st
M
s.
Nun
ez
,
inc
lud
ing
th
ree
co
unt
s of
dis
trib
uti
on of
a
con
trol
led
sub
stan
ce
s
che
dul
e
11
C.R
.S.
1
8-
-18-4051 ,- 2 a I A
- a
third -degree-felony;- People
-v.Jicole
Nuwe4-LaAnithas
Cnty
D
istr
ict C
our
t, 1
3C
R27 th
e
N
un
ez c
ase
.
6
9.
O
n
F
eb
ruar
y
1
3,
20
13,
th
e
defe
nse
cou
nse
l
file
d
a
Co
mb
ine
d
De
ma
nd
for
Pre
lim
inar
y He
arin
g, Mo
tio
n fo
r Di
sco
ver
y,
an
d
to
Red
uce
o
r
Mo
dif
y
Bo
nd.
Res
pon
de
nt did
no t
pro
duc
e
e
vid
enc
e
in his p
oss
essi
on,
i
nc l
udin
g
i
nfo
rma
tio
n
ab
ou t the
co
nfid
en
tial
info
rm
ant
Tr
avi
s M
urp
hy
o
r
Cl
w
ho
as
sist
ed
l
aw
enf
orc
eme
nt
in
a
st
ing
o
per
atio
n
inv
olv
ing
M
s.
Nun
ez.
70
.
R
esp
ond
en
t
did
n
ot
c
omp
ly wit
h
the C
rim
.
P.
1
6 1
aX
l
V
and
16
Q
a
l V
ll
ma
nda
tory aut
oma
tic
disc
los
ure
re
qu
irem
en
ts.
71.
On
February
25,
2013, Respondent sent
a
letter
to
law enforcement
asking
them
t
o
pro
vid
e
all
iden
tif
ying
in
for
ma
tion
ab
out
th
e Cl
f
or p
urp
ose
s
of
pr
odu
cin
g th
at
i
nfo
nna
tion
to
t
he
def
ens
e.
7
2. On
Jun
e 21
,
2
013
,
Res
pon
den
t se
nt a
le
tter
to
the
T
rin
ida
d P
olic
e
D
epa
rtm
ent
req
ues
tin
g th
at
th
ey
sen
d
th
e
N
un
ez
su
spe
cte
d
dru
g sa
mp
les
to CB
I f
or
te
stin
g.
73
.
O
n
Se
pte
mb
er
24
,
2
013
,
th
e T
rin
idad
Po
lice
D
ep
artm
en
t ga
ve
R
esp
on
den
t
a
Dru
g
I
nve
stig
atio
n
R
ep
ort
sta
ting
t
hat
the
p
olic
e
dep
artm
en
t
rece
ive
d
the
lab
re
por
t f
rom
the
CB
I,
i
den
tify
ing the
sub
stan
ces
th
e
Cl
h
ad
rec
eive
d f
rom
M
s. Nun
ez
a
s
met
h.
7
4.
A
lso
on
Se
pte
mbe
r 2
4,
20
13,
the
def
ens
e
f
iled
a
m
otio
n
to
di
smi
ss fo
r
d
isc
ove
ry
violations
alleging failure
to
produce relevant
evidence despite multiple
motions.
75.
t
t
he
ti
me
th
e
def
ens
e
fi
led
t
he
Mo
tion
to
Dis
mi
ss,
Re
spo
nd
ent
was
in
po
sse
ssio
n
of
som
e
of
th
e inf
orm
ati
on
r
ela
ted
t
o
the
fts a
lleg
ed
ly co
mm
itt
ed
b
y
th
e Cl,
inc
lud
ing
t
he
C
ls
me
dica
l rec
ord
s,
a
nd
the
C
ls re
loca
tio
n
ex
pen
ses
pa
id
to
t
he CI
by
la
w
e
nfo
rce
me
nt
and
/or
t
he
D
istr
ict
At
tor
ney
s O
ffi
ce.
7
6.
Cr
im.
P
.
1
6 1
a
X2
an
d 1
6V
stat
e th
at d
iscl
osu
re
o
f
evi
den
ce
wh
ich
tend
s to
ne
gat
e
the
gui
lt of
the ac
cus
ed
as to
t
he o
ffen
se
c
har
ged
, or
wou
ld
t
end to
re
du
ce
th
e
pun
ish
me
nt
th
eref
or,
is
m
and
ator
y
an
d
aut
oma
tic
.
77
. t
th
e
Sep
tem
be
r
27,
2
01
3
mo
tio
ns
hea
ring
,
R
es
pon
den
t
moved to
dismiss
the
case against
the
defen
dan
t
due
to
an
i
nab
ilit
y
to l
oca
te
the
c
onf
iden
tia
l
i
nfo
rma
nt.
On
S
epte
mb
er
3
0, 20
13
,
Re
spo
nde
nt
fi
led
a w
rit
ten M
ot
ion
to
D
ism
iss
,
ci
ting
h
is in
abi
lity
to
loc
ate
the
CL O
n Oc
tob
er
1 201
3
the co
urt
is
sue
d an
O
rder
G
ra
ntin
g
Pro
sec
utio
ns
M
ot
ion
to Dis
mis
s.
9
-
8/9/2019 Frank Ruybalid Filed Stipulation Agreement
10/128
7
8.
R
esp
on
den
t
d
id
not d
ilig
en
tly
rep
res
ent
t
he
P
eop
le
in v
iola
tion
o
f
o
b
R
PC
1.
3,
an
d
eng
age
d
co
ndu
ct
pre
jud
icia
l
to
the
ad
mi
nist
rati
on
o
f
j
us ti
ce
in
v
iol
atio
n
of C
ob
R
PC
8A
d
.
P
eopv .Tafoya 13C R39 in
dplinaiycomplaint
JO
79
.
On
Feb
rua
ry 8,
2
013
, R
esp
on
den
t
flie
d
a
C
om
pla
int
a
nd I
nfor
ma
tion
a
gai
nst
V
ince
nt
T
af
oya
b
ase
d
o
n M
r. Taf
oya
s
al
lege
d
sal
e o
f
th
ree
na
rco
tic
pi
lls
to
c
on
fide
ntia
l
in
for
man
t
C
r
, T
rav
is
M
u
rphy
,
i
n
Se
pte
mbe
r
2
012
d
urin
g
a
d
rug
stin
g o
per
atio
n.
8
0.
M
r.
Taf
iya
wa
s
c
har
ged
w
ith tw
o
cou
nts
of dist
ribu
tio
n
o
f
a
con
trol
led
sub
stan
ce,
s
che
du
le
II, a
c
las
s
th
ree
f
elon
y,
Peo
ple
v
V
in
cen
t
Taf
oya
, L
as
An
ima
s
C
ou
nty
Dis
tric
t C
ou
rt,
1
3CR
39
the
Ta
foy
a
c
ase
.
8
1.
L
aw
en
for
cem
en
t
w
as
pa
yin
g
the
C
ls
liv i
ng e
xpe
nse
s,
sp
eci
fica
lly
t
he
C
ls
re
nt,
dur
ing
a
nd
afte
r
th
e
dr
ug
stin
g op
era
tion
.
Re
spo
nde
nt
d
id
n
ot
t
ime
ly
pr
odu
ce
to the
de
fen
se
information
that was
in
his
possession,
or
available from law enforcement, rela ted
to
the
CI,
Tra
vis
M
urp
hy.
8
2.
On
F
ebru
ary
28
,
20
13
,
Res
pon
den
t
i
ssu
ed
a
sub
poe
na
to
te
stif
y
to
the
C
l.
R
esp
ond
ent
int
end
ed
t
o
c
all
th
e
CI
to
tes
tify
at
tria
l
aga
ins
t
th
e def
end
ant
,
M
r. Ta
foy
a.
Tri
al
in
th
e T
afo
ya
cas
e
w
as
se
t fo
r
Au
gus
t 2
0-2
1,
20
13.
8
3.
In
Ju
ne
20
13,
th
e R
esp
ond
ent
rec
eiv
ed
i
nfo
rma
tion
that
C
I Tr
avi
s
M
ur
phy
ha
d
b
een in
ve
stig
ated
b
y
law
en
for
cem
en
t
f
or tw
o
s
epa
rate
c
rim
es
bu
t w
as
no t
c
ha
rged
. I
n
F
ebr
uary
an
d
M
ar
ch
20
13,
th
e
R
es
pon
den
t h
ad
inf
orm
ati
on
th
at th
e
Dis
tric
t At
torn
ey
s
offi
ce
ha
d
p
aid
the
C
ls
l
ivin
g ex
pe
nses
in 201
3.
84.
Evidence
related
to incentives or money given
to
the
Cl
was exculpatory
ev
iden
ce
r
elat
ed
to
th
e
ca
se a
gai
nst
d
efe
nda
nt
Rob
ins
on
b
eca
use
the
e
vid
enc
e
ma
y h
av
e
te
nde
d
to
s
how
at tria
l
th
e
Cls
l
ack
o
f
cre
dib
ilit
y,
and
his
m
otiv
e
to
te
stif
y
fa
vor
abl
y
f
or
t
he
p
ros
ecu
tion
. Cr
im.
P.
16
I
a
2
a
nd
1
6 V
s
tate
that
disc
los
ure
o
f
evi
den
ce
w
hic
h
tend
s
to
ne
gat
e
th
e
gu
ilt
of
th
e ac
cus
ed
a
s to
the
of
fen
se
ch
arg
ed,
o
r wo
uld
te
nd
to r
edu
ce
the
pun
ish
me
nt
th
ere
for,
is
man
dat
ory
a
nd
aut
oma
tic
.
85
.
D
esp
ite
h
av
ing
in
for
ma
tion
th
at
the
Di
stric
t
At
tor
ney
s
offi
ce
had
pa
id
the
C
ls
li
vin
g
ex
pen
ses
in
201
3,
R
esp
ond
en
t
did
n
ot
d
isc
lose
the
inf
orm
ati
on
reg
ard
ing
th
e
Cl
s alle
ged
th
eft
s
to
the
def
ens
e
u
nti l
mi
d-A
ug
ust,
20
13.
8
6.
O
n
Ju
ly
8, 2
01
![Snow White Stipulation of Evidence[1]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/577d33d21a28ab3a6b8bd8a9/snow-white-stipulation-of-evidence1.jpg)
