FRACTURE

35
FRACTURE Brittle Fracture Ductile to Brittle transition Fracture Mechanics T.L. Anderson CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA (1995)

description

FRACTURE. Brittle Fracture Ductile to Brittle transition. Fracture Mechanics T.L. Anderson CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA (1995). Continuity of the structure. Welding instead of riveting. Residual stress. Breaking of Liberty Ships. Microcracks. Cold waters. High sulphur in steel. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of FRACTURE

Page 1: FRACTURE

FRACTURE

Brittle Fracture

Ductile to Brittle transition

Fracture MechanicsT.L. Anderson

CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA (1995)

Page 2: FRACTURE

Breakingof

Liberty ShipsCold waters

Welding instead of riveting

High sulphur in steel

Residual stress

Continuity of the structure

Microcracks

Page 3: FRACTURE

Fracture

Brittle

Ductile

Factors affecting fracture Strain rate

State of stress

Temperature

Page 4: FRACTURE

Behaviour described Terms Used

Crystallographic mode Shear Cleavage

Appearance of Fracture surface Fibrous Granular / bright

Strain to fracture Ductile Brittle

Path Transgranular Intergranular

Page 5: FRACTURE

Conditions of fracture

Torsion

Fatigue

Tension

Creep

Low temperature Brittle fracture

Temper embrittlement

Hydrogen embrittlement

Page 6: FRACTURE

Brittle fracture Little or no deformation Observed in single crystals and polycrystals Have been observed in BCC and HCP metals but not in FCC metals

Types of failure

Promoted by High Strain rate

Triaxial state of State of stress

Low Temperature

Page 7: FRACTURE

Shear fracture of ductile single crystals Not observed in polycrystals

Slip plane

Page 8: FRACTURE

Completely ductile fracture of polycrystals → rupture Very ductile metals like gold and lead behave like this

Page 9: FRACTURE

Ductile fracture of usual polycrystals Cup and cone fracture Necking leads to triaxial state of stress Cracks nucleate at brittle particles (void formation at the matrix-particle

interface)

Page 10: FRACTURE

Theoretical shear strength and cracks

The theoretical shear strength (to break bonds and cause fracture) of perfect crystals ~ (E / 6)

Strength of real materials ~ (E / 100 to E /1000) Tiny cracks are responsible for this Cracks play the same role in fracture (of weakening)

as dislocations play for deformation

App

lied

For

ce (

F)

r →a0

Cohesive force

E cohesive

Page 11: FRACTURE

=2a a

Characterization of Cracks

Surface or interior Crack length Crack orientation with respect to geometry and loading Crack tip radius

Page 12: FRACTURE

Crack growth and failure

Brittle fracture

Crack growth criteria

Stress based

Energy based Global ~Thermodynamic

Local ~Kinetic

Griffith

Inglis

Page 13: FRACTURE

For growth of crack

Sufficient stress concentration should exist at crack tip to break bonds

It should be energetically favorable

Page 14: FRACTURE

Brittle fracture → ► cracks are sharp & no crack tip blunting► No energy spent in plastic deformation at the crack tip

Page 15: FRACTURE

Griffith’s criterion for brittle crack propagation

When crack growsc 4 energy surfacein Increase

E c energy elastic in Reduction

22

E c c 4 U energy in Change

22

c →

U →

0dc

Ud

0U

*c0c

sizecrack criticalc *

Page 16: FRACTURE

c →

U →

*1c

0c*2c

Increasing str

ess

E 2 c

2*

By some abracadabra*f c

E 2

At constant stresswhen c > c* by instantaneous nucleation then specimen fails

At constant c (= c* → crack length)when exceeds f then specimen fails

Griffith

Page 17: FRACTURE

If a crack of length c* nucleates “instantaneously” then it can grow with decreasing energy → sees a energy downhill

On increasing stress the critical crack size decreases

c →

Fracture

stable

E 2 c

2*

*c

0

0

To derive c* we differentiated w.r.tc keeping constant

Page 18: FRACTURE

Stress criterion for crack propagation

Cracks have a sharp tip and lead to stress concentration

0

c

σσ 210max

0 → applied stress

max → stress at crack tip

→ crack tip radius

c

σσ 0max 2

= c

For a circular hole

c

cσσ 210max

0max 3σσ

Page 19: FRACTURE

E

cohesive

Work done by crack tip stresses to create a crack (/grow an existing crack)

= Energy of surfaces formed

ca

Ef

04

After lot of approximations

Inglis

a0 → Interatomic spacing

Page 20: FRACTURE

Griffith versus Inglis

ca

Ef

04

Inglis

*f c

E 2

Griffith

result samethe give criterion Inglis and sGriffith' 8a

If 0

0 3a Griffith's and Inglis criterion give the same result

the 'Dieter' cross-over criterion

If

2f

* E 2 c

a

Ec

f

20

*

4

Page 21: FRACTURE

Rajesh Prasad’s Diagrams Validity domains for brittle fracture criteria

Sharpest possible crack Approximate border for changeover of criterion

c →

a0 3a0

Validityregion

forEnergycriterion

Griffith

Validityregion

forStresscriterion

Inglis

Sharp cracks

Blunt cracks

> c

= c

Page 22: FRACTURE

c →

a0

c*

Safety regions applying Griffith’s criterion alone

Unsafe

Safe

2f

* E 2 c

Page 23: FRACTURE

UnsafeSafe

c →

a0

Safety regions applying Inglis’s criterion alone

a

Ec

f

20

*

4

Page 24: FRACTURE

c →

a0

c*

3a0

Griffith safeInglis unsafe safe

Griffith unsafeInglis safe safe

Griffith safeInglis unsafe unsafe

Griffith unsafeInglis unsafe unsafe

Griffith safeInglis safe safe

Page 25: FRACTURE

Ductile – brittle transition

Deformation should be continuous across grain boundary in polycrystalsfor their ductile behaviour ► 5 independent slip systems required(absent in HCP and ionic materials)

FCC crystals remain ductile upto 0 K Common BCC metals become brittle at low temperatures or at v.high

strain rates

Ductile y < f yields before fracture

Brittle y > f fractures before yielding

Page 26: FRACTURE

f ,

y →

y

T →

f

DBTT

DuctileBrittle

Ductile yields before fractureBrittle fractures before yield

ca

Ef

04

Inglis

*f c

E 2

Griffith

Page 27: FRACTURE

f ,

y →

y (BCC)

T →

f

DBTT

y (FCC)

No DBTT

Page 28: FRACTURE

Griffith versus Hall-Petch

*f c

E 2

d

kiy

Griffith Hall-Petch

*

'1

c

k

c

E 2

*f

Page 29: FRACTURE

f ,

y →

y

d-½ →

DBT

T1

T2

T1T2f

Grain size dependence of DBTT

Finer sizeLarge size

Finer grain size has higher DBTT better

T1T2 >

Page 30: FRACTURE

f ,

y →

y

d-½ →

DBT

T1

T2

T1 f

Grain size dependence of DBTT- simplified version - f f(T)

Finer size

Finer grain size has lower DBTT better

T1T2 >

Page 31: FRACTURE

Protection against brittle fracture

↓ f ↓ done by chemical adsorbtion of moleculeson the crack surfaces

Removal of surface cracks etching of glass(followed by resin cover)

Introducing compressive stresses on the surface Surface of molten glass solidified by cold air followed by

solidification of the bulk (tempered glass) → fracture strength can be increased 2-3 times

Ion exchange method → smaller cations like Na+ in sodiumsilicate glass are replaced by larger cations like K+ on the surface of glass → higher compressive stresses than tempering

Shot peening Carburizing and Nitriding Pre-stressed concrete

*f c

E 2

Page 32: FRACTURE

Cracks developed during grinding of ceramics extend upto one grain use fine grained ceramics (grain size ~ 0.1 m)

Avoid brittle continuous phase along the grain boundaries → path for intergranular fracture (e.g. iron sulphide film along grain boundaries in steels → Mn added to steel to form spherical manganese sulphide)

Page 33: FRACTURE

Ductile fracture → ► Crack tip blunting by plastic deformation at tip► Energy spent in plastic deformation at the crack tip

Ductile fracture

y

r →

y

r →Sharp crack Blunted crack

Schematic

r → distance from the crack tip

Page 34: FRACTURE

E c c )( 4 U energy in Change

22

ps

*

psf c

E )( 2

Orowan’s modification to the Griffith’s equation to include “plastic energy”

232 )1010(~

)21(~

J/m

J/m

p

2s

*

pf c

E 2

Page 35: FRACTURE