F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION · F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION...
78
F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION TO: Dave Turner, Remedial Project Manager, EPA Philadelphia, Pennsylvania John iT. Mueck, Jr., TechnicaX-Assistance Team, Region III, Wheeling, West Virginia^/fR FROM: THRU: Joseph B. Carter, ATATL, Region Wheeling, West Virginia THRU: Gerald T. Heston, OSC,EPA Region III Philadelphia, Pennsylvania SUBJECT: Trip Report - Westinghouse Sharon NPL Site, Sharon, Mercer County, Pennsylvania TDDl 9410-160 PCSf 1160 - .'.'-'- ". ' ' DATE: November 5, 1994 " . . Background . The Sharon Westinghouse NPL Site is located at 369 Sharpsville Avenue in Sharon, Mercer County, Pennsylvania. For 63 years, Westinghouse Electric Corporation owned and operated this Site where they manufactured, repaired, and shipped electrical transformers and dielectric components. Westinghouse used poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as a dielectric fluid in the manufactured components that they produced at the Site. A number of chemicals were used in the manufacturing process, and various waste streams were generated containing PCBs, metals, and solvents. During operations, materials, including PCB-contaminated oils, were routinely burned in an incinerator located onsite. In 1985, Westinghouse shut down operations and sold some portions of their property to neighboring industries. The Site was proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL) in 1988. currently, Westinghouse is performing a Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RI/FS) at the Site under an Order with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Samples taken during the RI have shown that contaminated soil is present on the Site. EPA determined that off-site soil sampling was necessary to investigate migration of these contaminants into the residential, commercial and industrial properties surrounding the Site. F. Weston,Inc. AJOR PROGRAMS DIVISION In Association with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Resource Applications, Inc., CC. Johnson & Malhotra, P.C, R.E. SarrieraAssociates, and GRB Environmental Services, Inc.
Transcript of F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION · F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION...
F°R EMKRGENCY'RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION
TO: Dave Turner, Remedial Project Manager, EPAPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
John iT. Mueck, Jr., TechnicaX-Assistance Team, RegionIII, Wheeling, West Virginia^/fR
FROM:
THRU: Joseph B. Carter, ATATL, RegionWheeling, West Virginia
THRU: Gerald T. Heston, OSC, EPA Region IIIPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
SUBJECT: Trip Report - Westinghouse Sharon NPL Site,Sharon, Mercer County, PennsylvaniaTDDl 9410-160 PCSf 1160 -
. ' . ' - ' - " . ' 'DATE: November 5, 1994 "
. .Background .
The Sharon Westinghouse NPL Site is located at 369 SharpsvilleAvenue in Sharon, Mercer County, Pennsylvania. For 63 years,Westinghouse Electric Corporation owned and operated this Sitewhere they manufactured, repaired, and shipped electricaltransformers and dielectric components. Westinghouse usedpoly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as a dielectric fluid in themanufactured components that they produced at the Site. A numberof chemicals were used in the manufacturing process, and variouswaste streams were generated containing PCBs, metals, and solvents.During operations, materials, including PCB-contaminated oils, wereroutinely burned in an incinerator located onsite. In 1985,Westinghouse shut down operations and sold some portions of theirproperty to neighboring industries. The Site was proposed for theNational Priorities List (NPL) in 1988.currently, Westinghouse is performing a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) at the Site under an Order with theCommonwealth of Pennsylvania. Samples taken during the RI haveshown that contaminated soil is present on the Site. EPAdetermined that off-site soil sampling was necessary to investigatemigration of these contaminants into the residential, commercialand industrial properties surrounding the Site.
F. Weston, Inc.AJOR PROGRAMS DIVISION
In Association with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Resource Applications, Inc., CC. Johnson & Malhotra, P.C,R.E. Sarriera Associates, and GRB Environmental Services, Inc.
Westinghouse Sharon NPL sitaTrip Report ,Paga 2 - ' •• . " • • • • • - / ' . .' : " " - , ;,
In May 1994, UiS. EPA Qn-Scena Coordinator (OSC) Heston tasked RoyF. Weston, Inc., Technical Assistance Team (TAT) to collect 31 off-site soil samples for analysis for PCBs, pesticides, metals,cyanide, volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, dioxins, anddibenzo furans.
Sampling Activities *
On August 2, 1994, four members of TAT mobilized from the Wheeling,West Virginia office to tha Westinghousa Sharon Site to conductsampling activities. TAT personnel met with EPA Remedial ProjectManager (RPM) for tha Site, Dava Turner, and EPA Office of PublicAffairs (OPA), Pat Gaughan. RPM Turner and OPA Gaughan hadprepared access agreements for property owners which allowed EPA toaccess and sample individual yards. Tabla 1 in Attachment 9 ofthis report lists tha sample locations, residents and addresseswhera access was granted. v ••
During the first day of tha sampling event, August 2, 1994, TATpersonnel signed in at tha guard shack at tha Westinghousa propertyentrance off Sharpesvilla Avenue and set up a support zona and asample preparation area insida tha Westinghousa Facility gat*. TATused their Emergency Response Vehicle (ERV) as a basa of operationsand to supply power to tha blenders used in preparing dioxinsamples. In addition, tha offica space was used to completesampling paperwork.
TAT personnel separated into two teams, a sampling taaa and asample preparation team, and began sampling activities. A tripblank/ a blender cup rinsata blank, and soil samples SOI - 312 waraobtained throughout tha day. In addition, sample SOS was a doublavolume sample for laboratory quality assurance (QA). Tha soilsamples wara obtained fron 3" -6" depth following tha guidelinesof tha sampling plan with ona exception* Stainless steal scoopswara used for sample collection, instead of dedicated plasticscoops. Tha stainless steal scoops wara decontaminated after eachusa. Samples wera obtained from locations showing minimal recentdisturbance and minimal potential for cross-contamination fromother sources (ia. vehicles). Where available, residents assistedTAT by showing locations of their properties which had beenundisturbed* Tha sampling team marked tha locations of tha sampleson a fiald map, measured and logged distances from tha samplingpoint to nearby landmarks, and photographed tha sampling locations.Tha sampling locations ara shown on tha sample location map inAttachment A of this report. .Tha sample preparation team followed tha guidelines.of tha samplingplan in preparing tha dioxin/dibenzo furan samples with onaexception. Tha samples wara first obtained in clean sample jars
AR300620
Westinghouse Sharon NPL.Site /Trip Report 'Page 3 ,
then transferred £o the stainless steel blending cup forpreparation., After blending, the soil sample was returned to theoriginal container. Five soil samples (SOI, S04, S06, S07, S09)and one blender cup rinsate blank were prepared for dioxin/dibenzofuran analysis by the end of the day.
On the second day of the 'sampling event, August 3, 1994, TATpersonnel continued and completed sampling and sample preparationactivities. Two stainless steel spoon rinsate samples (RB-1, RB-2)and soil samples S13 - S31 were obtained, of the soil samplescollected, ten were comprised of additional volumes fordioxin/dibenzo furan analysis (S15, S16, S17, S20, S24, S27, S28,S29, S30, S31), four were from background locations (S28, S29, S30,S31), sample S16 was a blind duplicate of S15, and sample S23 wasa blind duplicate of sample S22.
TAT personnel departed the Site on August 3, 1994 and returned totha Wheeling, WV office on the morning of August 4, 1994. ContractLaboratory Program (CLP) samples wera shipped to the CLP designatedlabs on August 4, 1994. The dioxin/dibenzo furan samples wereshipped on August 5, 1994. TAT received the analytical data byOctober 1994.
Sample Analysis
As shown in Table 1, one trip blank, two scoop rinsate samples, oneblender cup rinsate, and 31 soil samples (including two blindduplicates and two extra volume samples) were obtained during thetrip. All samples except the trip blank and blender cup rinsateblank were analyzed for total metals, cyanide, volatile organics(VOA), base, neutral and acid axtractables (BNA), andpesticides/polychlorinatad biphenyls (PEST/PCB) through theContract Laboratory Program (CLP). Tha trip blank was analyzed forVOA. Through the CLP, Mack .Laboratories, Inc., Pittsburgh, PAperformed the total metals and cyanide analyses (see Attachment C).Envirosystems, Inc., Columbia, HD performed .the VOA, BNA andPEST/PCB analyses (see Attachment D). " , • . ; ! - ' ;Fifteen of the 31 soil samples and the blender cup rinsate samplewere analyzed for isomer specific polychlorinatad dibenzo dioxinsand polychlorinated dibenzo furans and to determine the toxicityequivalents as 2,3,7,8 tetra chloro dibenzo dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD).These analyses were conducted by the Weston Lionville AnalyticalLaboratory, Lionville, PA (see Attachment E).
ftR3Q062l
Westinghousa Sharon NPL SiteTrip ReportPaga. 4 • \ • ...'•• . -.. ^ • . '• • < • .. :
Attachments • ' , • ~ _. / ' ; • • , . - "; '. ' /' ' ;' ,. •' • ..;'•
Attachment A - Sample Location MapsAttachment B - Sample Information Log
Attachment C - Inorganics Data Validation, Analytical Summary,Traffic Report,
V * ' ' ' . " . ' • , ' - • '
Attachment D— Organics Data Validation, Analytical Summary,Traffic Report
Attachment E - Dioxin/Dibehzo furan Data Validation, AnalyticalSummary, Chain-of-Custody
AR300622
Attachment ASample Location Maps
flR300623
•vJ
PAGE OMITTED
/' ^
ftR3Q062'l»
Attachment BSample Information Log
AR3U0625
AR300626
** VT v-~ * -V
; Attachment C
Inorganics Data Validation, Aaalytieal Summary, Traffic Report
HR300627
Environmental Systems & Technologies Co.isianct Teams' . phono;(4(0, 268-7705
1419 Forest Drive. Suit, .04 ' l'- F«: (4 1 0)268-8472Annapolis. Maryland 21403 ' ,
DATBt SEPTEMBER ?3, 1994 , '
SUBJECT: INORGANIC DATA VALIDATION ' CA$E 22533 ,. SITE: WESTINGHOUSE SHARON
• ' " A^ "FROM I CVSHOBHA BODDUVfP , MAHBOOBEH MECANIC
' INORGANIC DATA REVIEWER SENIOR OVERSIGHT, CHEMIST
TOJ SUSANNE STEVENS \ESAT ACTING REGIONAL PROJECT OFFICER
THROUGH: • DALE s. BOSKARTESAT TEAM MANAG
Tha sat of samples for casa 22533 consisted of thirty-three (33) soil samples and two (2) associated rinsateblanks* Included in tha sample sat vera two (2) fieldduplicate pairs. Tha samples vera analyzed by MackLaboratories (HACK) for total metals and cyanide (CN)according to tha Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)Routine Analytical Services (RA3) statement of Work(SOW) ILM03.0.
Tha Chemical Health Advisory Level was exceeded for thecadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) analytes in several samples.Tha Regional Project Manager (RPM) was notified. SeaTable 4 for details.SUMMARY • " . « • •
Tha samples vera analyzed under two (2 X Sample DeliveryGroups (SDGs) and tha data validation was alsoperformed on an SDG basis.All analytes except antimony (Sb) and selenium (Sa) inSDG MCRS73 were successfully analyzed in all samples.Areas of concern with respect to data usability arelisted below according to tha seriousness of theproblem. ' . ' • " , . . • • • _ , " • • - - ' , •MAJOR PROBLEM f
Tha Contract Required detection Limit (CRDL) standardrecoveries fell balov 50% for tha Sb and Sa analytes inSDG MCRS73. Tha quantitation limits in tha affectedsamples are unusable and have been qualified "R".
AR300628
Page 2 of 4- ' \
MINOR IS8UE8 ,
The rinsate (RB), preparation (£B) and continuingcalibration (CCB) blanks had reported results greaterthan the Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) for theanalytes listed below. The reported results which areless than five times (< 5x) the blank concentrationsmay be biased high and have been qualified "BM.
££2£ Blank Type Analvtefs'l
MCRS57 RB cadmium (Cd), calcium (Ca),mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni),sodium (Na), zinc (Zn)
PB (Soil) potassium (K)PB (Aqueous) Ca, Kg, Na
CCB copper (Cu), Ni
KCRS73 RB Cd, Ca, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn
PB Na
Tha matrix spike recovery was high and the CRDL 'standard recovery was extremely low for the Se analytein SDG MCRS73, resulting in opposing bias affects. Thereported results which are < 2x CRDL for this analyteare estimated and have been qualified NJM.The matrix spike recoveries were low for the Sb andarsenic (As) analytes for the soil samples in SDGHCRS57 and for the Sb analyte in SDG MCRS73. Thequantisation limits and reported results for theseanalytes may be biased low and have respectively beenqualified "UL" and "L11, unless superseded by the MR«qualifier.The soil matrix spike recovery was high for the Hg andSe analytes in SDG MCRS57. The reported results forthese analytes in the affected samples may be biasedhigh and have been qualified "K", unless superseded bythe »B« qualifier.
CRDL standard recoveries were high for tha analytesgiven below. The reported results which are < 2x CRDLmay be biased high and have been qualified "K", unlesssuperseded by the *BM qualifier. .
i" 'SDG Analytes .
MCRS57 Cd, CU, Ni, Se
KCRS73 Cd, Ni ,
AR300629
3. of ,4 -
The CRDL standard recoveries were low for the analytesgiven below. The reported results which are < 2x CRDLand quantitation limits for these analytes may be'biased low and have been qualified "L" and HULM,respectively. \
SDG Analvtaa \
Sb, As, chromium (cr)cu •., •- /' - ' : ' . " ' . -
The analytical spike recovery was low for the thallium(Tl) analyte in sample MCRS70 of SDG MCRS57. Thequantitation limit for this analyte in this sample maybe biased low and has been qualified "ULn. - * ••
Tha continuing calibration blanks had negative resultswith absolute values greater than the IDL for thaaluminum (Al) and X analytes in SDG MCRS57, and Tlanalyte in SDG MCRS73. Tha quantitation limits forthese analytes which have negative raw data results mayb«( biased low and have been qualified HUL".NOTESThe. laboratory marked tha sample results for the Pb, Hgand CN analytes in SDG MCRS57, and tha Of analyte inSDG MCRS73 with a "** denoting laboratory duplicateresults outside tha contractual control limits .(20% RPD, ± CRDL). since the technical control limits \Jfor tha soil samples (35% RPD, ±2xCRDL) were hot ^exceeded for these analytes, no data wera qualifiedduring validation.The laboratory did not account for tha 10-fold dilutionwhile reporting tha result for tha Fa analyte on thaForm I for sample MCRS57 (SDG MCRS57), Thisdiscrepancy has been rectified during validation.Tha results for the field duplicate pairs vera withinthe technical control limits except for the analyteslisted in Table 5. Because there are no criteriaestablished in Region III for field duplicateprecision, no data vera qualified.
1 • t -;The analytical spike recoveries vera high for tha Pband Tl analytes in several samples in SDG MCRS57 andfor the Se and Tl analytes in SDG MCRS73. Theseanalytes vera not detected above tha IDL in thesesamples. Because high recoveries do hot affectquantitation limits, no action was taken.Soil sample results are calculated on tha basis of theraw data values (in ug/L), tha gram weight of sampleused; the volume of tha digestate, and the % solids »according to tha following equation* -S
AR300630
- • " ' . . . rage 4 o f 4
(raw value, ug/L) (digestate volume. L)mg/Kg - —————————————;———————————————___
(weight, g) (% solids/100)
To obtain quantitation limit, insert the IDL (Form X)for the raw value; refer to Form XIII to obtain eachsample preparation weight and volume used. Thequantitation limits thus obtained are specific for eachsample and preparation method.The data were reviewed in accordance with the NationalFunctional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analyses(IM2 Level), with modifications for use withinRegion III.
INFORMATION REGARDING REPORT CONTENT -
Table 1A is a summary of qualifiers added to the results of thelaboratory during validation.ATTACHMENTS
TABLE 1A SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARY AFTER DATA-, VALIDATION
TABLE IB CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN
TABLE 2 GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES
TABLE 3 DATA SUMMARY FORM
TABLE 4 SAMPLES EXCEEDING THE CHEMICAL HEALTH ADVISORY,. " LIMITS
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF FIELD DUPLICATE RESULTS
APPENDIX A RESULTS REPORTED BY LABORATORY FORM Is
APPENDIX B SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION.
DCN: SB409A03.WKS
4R3U063I
- Paga 1 of 2TABLB 1A
SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARYFORM AFTER DATA VALIDATION
... ' . • ' '. NON- ' 'POSITIVE DETECTED
ANALYTB SDq SAMPLES AFFECTED* VALUES VALUE 3 BIAS COMMENTS*
Al MCRS57 70,81 UL Low CCN(-167
Sb MCRS57 70,81 ' UL Low CRL(79.2*,53.3%)
57-60 UL LOW CRL(79.2%,53.3%)•• • \ MSL(70.6%)
61-69,71,72 L UL LOW CRL(81.7%)MSL(70.6%)
MCRS73 All samples R EXtr. CRE(43.3%)Low MSL(43.0%)
As MCRS57 70,81 UL Low CRL(77.0%)
. All soil samples L Low MSL(64.5%)
Cd MCRS57 All soil samples B High RB(12.0except 57,60,66,63,71
57,60,66,63,71 B High RB( 12.0.,'...: CRH(120%,120»
MCRS73 73,74,77-79,82,83 B High RB(12.0i • . ' f
75,76,84-89,91 B High RB(12.0CRH(120%,120%)
Ca MCRS57 60,66 B High RB( 1300 ;ig/L)
70,81 B High PB(344
MCRS73 75,88-91 B High RB(1300
CT MCRS57 70,81 OL 3Low CRL(80.0%)
CU MCRS57 81 B High CCB (14.0- CRH(140%,124%)
MCRS73 33,90,91 B High RB(12.0CRL(73.0%,84.0%)
89 B. High RB(12.0 .
Pb MCRS73 88-90 B High RB(51.2 JKT/X*)( •
+ All samples begin with tha prefix MCRS. i* Sea explanation of Comments on Tabla IB. ^— '
X •
HR300632
SUMMARY OF QUALIFIERS ON DATA SUMMARYPORK AFTER DATA VALIDATION
KON-POS1TIVB DETECTED
£££ SAMPLES XFFECTED+ V&LUE8 VAfcPEg BIAS COMMENTS*
Hg MCRS57 57,59-66,69,71 B High RB(0.5MSH(130%)
70/si -P High PB(o,258,67,68,72 K High MSH(130%)
' . ' •MCRS73 73,75-80,82,85,90, B High RB(0.50
' , 9 1 . ' . ' "
Ni MCRS57 57,60,62,66,68,71 B High RB(19.0i ' .
70,81 B High CCB (2 3.0CRH(118%,126%)
MCRS73 80,84-91 B High RB(l9.0 jtq/l)CRH(126%,114%)
76,78,82,83 B High RB(19.0
K KCRS57 All soil samples B High PB(642
70,81 UL Low CCN(-4590
Sa MCRS57 61,64,66,67,69,72 K High KSH(159%)CRH(136%)
MCRS73 All samples except R Extr. CRE(18.0%)79,80,86 LOW
79,60,86 J MIX(127%,18.0%)
Na HCRS57 All soil samples B HIGH RB(1070 M9/L)
70,81 B HIGH tt(718 Jig/t)
MCRS73 All samples B HIGH PB(286 mg/Kg)' * ' ' • . • ' -Tl MCRS57 70 OL LOW ANL(83.0%)
MCRS73 73,76-78,80,82-84, UL LOW CCH(-€.0 fig/L)'' . n , ' ' . , , . ' .
Zn KCRS57 57,60-63,65-69,71, B High RB(2140 |cg/L)72 • . ' ' . ' - • . - ,. . ' • '
KCRS73 All samples B High RB(2140
•f All samples 'begin with the prefix MCRS.* See explanation of Comments on Table IB.
'AR300633
TABLE IB
CODES USED IN COMMENTS COLUMN
CCN « The continuing calibration blank had a negative resultwith absolute value greater than the IDL (the result isin parenthesis). The quantitation limits may be biased
'• low. . • • •• . • • . •
CRL * The CRDL standard recovery was low (< 90%) (% recoveryis in parenthesis]. The reported results which are < 2^t
' CRDL and quantitation limits may ba biased low.
MSL - The matrix spike recovery was low (30% - 75%) [%recovery is in parenthesis]. Tha reported results andquantitation limits may ba biased low.
CRE * Tha CRDL standard recovery was extremely low (< 50%) [%recovery is in parenthesis]. Tha quantitation limitsare unusable. ;
R3 - The rinsate blank had a result > IDL (tha result isin parenthesis). The reported results which are < 5xtha blank concentration may be biased high.
CRH - Tha CRDL standard recovery was high (> 110%) (% recoveryis in parenthesis]. The reported results which are < 2xCRDL may be biased high.
CCB - Tha continuing calibration blank had a result > IDL (tharesult is in parenthesis). Tha reported results whichare < 5x tha blank concentration may be biased high.
; . ' • i , . ' / ' / • ' ' 'PB - The preparation blank had a result > IDL (tha result is
in parenthesis). Tha reported results which are < Sxtha blank concentration may ba biased high, j
MIX - Tha matrix spike recovery was high (> 125%) and tha CRDLstandard recovery was extremely low (< 50%) [%recoveries are in parenthesis]. Tha reported resultswhich are < 2x CRDL estimated.
ANL - The analytical spika recovery was low (< 85%) [%recovery is in parenthesis). The quantitation limitsmay ba. biased low.
AR300631*
TABLE 2
GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES ((INORGANIC)
COPES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of analytes):
U » Not detected. The associated number indicatesapproximate sample concentration necessary to bedetected.
(NO CODE) - Confirmed identification.
B - Not detected substantially above the levelreported in laboratory or field blanks.
R - Unusable result. Analyte may or may not bepresent in the sample. Supporting data necessary
' ' , , ' . t o confirm result.CODES RELATED TO OUANTTTATTON(can be used for both positive results and sample quantitationlimits): ,
J - Analyte Present. Reported value may not beaccurate or precise.
K - Analyte present. Reported value may be biasedhigh. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L - Analyte present. Reported value may be biasedl j low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
[J - Analyte present. As values approach the IDL thequantitation may not ba accurate.
U J - Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurateor imprecise. .
UL - Not detected, quantitation limit is probablyhigher.
OTHER CODES
ft — No analytical result.i•K "m Result reported from dilution. Quantitation limit
is elevated.
AR JO'0635
f • ' ' • . ' . ; '.. TABLB 4 . •
SAMPLES EXCEEDING THB CHEMICAL HEALTH ADVISORY LEVELS
SDQ MCRS57
AdvisoryAnalyta Limit Sample Concentration
Cd 8 MCRS70 12.0
Pb 20 MCRS70 35.1. MCRS81 51.2
STX3 MCRSS7(mg/Kg)
AdvisoryAnalyta Limit 5 amp la Concentration
Pb 500 MCRS64 595MCRS55 785MCRS67 698MCRS69 $93MCRS72 1120
5CK3 MCRS73 .(mg/Kg)
AdvisoryAnalyta Lini-fc Samola Concentration
. Pb 500 MCRS73 525MCRS74 567MCRS77 3380HCRS78 2310MCRS79 870MCRS82 530MCRS33 817
AR300636
TABLE 5
FIELD DUPLICATE RESULTS OUTSIDE CRITERIA .
Criteria for soil samples; 35% RPD, ± 2x CRDL
SPG; MCRS73 /
Concentra t ion (ma/Kg iAnalyte MCRS77 MCftS78 RPD
Ba 894 542 49.0Ca 14200 31300 75.2Kg 3890 7850 3960+
RPD - Relative Percent Difference+ - Difference in mg/Kg instead of RPD.
AR300637
r
MU
g
* J-
! ii ?I IS 3HI
- I 1J - 3 3•« Ii J i I
fc
1 *1 V
sf *
!!11j' •e
' '
<
,
^ '
i It I
HI
ii 1111 —— i.U1f1 .-,-5
'• , .3
J 1 MJJ.| IJ'M M II M 1 1 1 1 M"
i II M
1 1 I I
1 1 1 1
1 I I
^ ^m m *
* '•
* M
*hs^I - i - iHI*]_l_jli_l-i's's'i1-a,j i*,_
M 1 1 1 II 1 1
M M iM i l
J.J 1
1 1'
- — — — —
. *'1
-jj-1
ar'illsfjsjiJ_!-J_J_!iii'8,1*;
1
_
•ssM
J3
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 n 1 1 11 1 1
i
,
i
I
§\
•i
•
MS
a
?i
•M ••
£S
J
2'"S w
1 1
1
J_
at
,1c
«
Us^-i°
i;vi**,
«
1 1
—
^j-M
••
JVJ£
1Ls;iii0*
1
3i
_
-
i*»-!o
•i
v
i^
ji5
1
1
I
1 1
-
—
J*1
1
1H
J
5i11
3
i
3M
I
2M
1
^
J
J
Jo1"I
1
^
-P
-
• M ' O
l§l*• o.ITn .la*k - ,
^ Ji3
COCOu>CD
cc-3
1
25} >F
i
w
W •
SM
IIl.J•'
MU
5I'•<••oe
i
S<o «
O'. :-SBW. »-. O
llIT— — o= IS J
s.2 g 2 •? I 2 " S I « I - ~ "•g__iJJj1J11111J2ljJJJJJJjl. . . . . .
iS£4U
Iii*
o* 2 8 S • 6S? * O _• rf « |rt IJJ felI • *"J I J J 1 1 I J I I JJJJJ IJJI I
?•" • 5o tQ * _
2JffljJJJj1l2l2JJJll3l1* s1 W5'5"3"SI iJg'g'tf ¥8VSZ£ ^ ih
m ^. ^* ^*«
WJJJJJ
1 1
i i
e sr~I
IJJJ J
• s ' 2 3 -s c fi * * » -i<t«. R. &..*. fe 5 CL E. 4 ft
Jjjj1~~
,- ...Jl'JJJ——!_
3IlJ
.U I IJ^ i
I
_^^ i
I I^ ^ i
U«•' H «f g I
» "
_ _ _JJJ
111** 4 * k « « y — .^ • ^ *Z 9 •!K f C K 5 !lttt " < i ' ' " I t - - *
Ici .? ^* * . j»*• 3 «
i i
S,
IJ I
! §"W '
8 £ _S
s
I
ijll& s-* \l
i
1
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 1 1 1 l l 1 1 1
si jjj.
!fI~
c" *f
- S~* ** s
••J I» i -«i I "a
I!s ®= 1
1 1
s^
3
JJ
JJtJJ-]J
i j i
** -S *X~. a %dV W ^™ ~I n
JaB.a.s«3«-^^^
JJ"
jl
tQ "53 _!J
J-
3S±j
jjL
8!
^nS S
i^j^n• • 4 <4»*• •« 1 •*- - * l3. •*
-SSo1«C «y
J J J
35 a.11
3J*23»« .J «• * h Q
j3
liillllln
$.4 i
.~±
J« _!
l S
Ji
35.iiiliiiilrl— It 3i — •*•--•iilliJiiJlij
SffifflffiteiBiBS_!_!«!_!_!—!_
3
5
1
J«!JJJJJjJJJJJjlJlJlJ?lJll!I* r i i i i —________ — , . &II
si*« **
a* o • n
*, -, S, «,
» M
_____________________s.5,0,z
5
I
MU
40mo «>
IU
•cI
iII I
s 2Ss. «N(
2
I I
r i io
• ••?• *™ ^ ^ ^ J ^ —J -* __I _ _ HIHJJJJJJJJJ^JJJ (Ip ' *? » 8 q' ^ o1
MTL1
•*». *. *•. 3:8I I
i i
yjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj' ' ' JJJJ - ™——-i ^
S!
«
e
£
IJ JJJJJJJJJJ/U I I «
IJJJJJJJJJJJJJJIs'UIMJll IN* J « -. S V 5 «' 8 e e1 e r e P• • M W * • * M ' B O^ O* M *N>^$e*:*«iDMS.p{fcS™e'iSo
JJJJJJJJJJJ.J i IJJJJJ J JJ I•^e^fVfi.'gpis^jOg"" *" ** " ** * N ft ~ ** * N l l
|— — ---i_____*.————,^-» _^———, ————— -___i____________:___:-rl
J*1 IJ I
_^
t«
4*u
ft* M
-*1
• . 4f
*I« 3
«
s'
i5
! JJJJJJJjJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJill§2 1«*. i
jl
UJJJJJJJJJJJJjIjls
«"IJJJJJJJJJJJ IJJJJJJ*"jonjjftjr"• «-« • O M • M •* • •-- SfiSiEfiMsi.
UJ31JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ'-- ' 'l grfl j' a1 | If 53'
21! 5 III! Si! 3 S III! J Jjj_ 33•JJJJJJ_-!JJJJJ
.e
-.3
53
-'.33d
JJJJ
J.
°s 3 *! *:.s-.s a ». a s. a. Ki ™i "iUJJJJJ
•* F 9 S o S e**. •*. «. —. . «. 3,
-i'JjJI^gs1?^«4 • • O <« ** *• «s«s.». fe. fe a I'S
• ssi33s s i J31
ellut
IJ 1 I I I• '• M • «q • « "• 3 M'j. &. . s a. tf. fc R. a a
i ij ui iiQjjj
_!_!_!.
,' U
J
j:* 8
nnjj_i HJ
!'i
IJJJM -* * • •
.1
S
• a3 Si iu
i.i]!
_! _!_!_•_!,' I
jj
«'»•5iJ
3 j,'s1 IJ
i2
J li !53.3i 2 fe i »1 S J -s Si | S = | '2. . . „ ..JiliiuIuijilIlHIiiIiiJ •' « * I !_!_!-!-l-!-!-!-!-!-!-i-!-!-!-J-!-!-!-!-!-J-i-iI i l ______ii j!ijjiJDJ«iJi jji j
l-flA
Attachment D
Organics Data validation, Analytical Summary, Traffic Report
U - . . - ' • - • . 'AR:*006l»7
Environmental Services Assistance Teams , Phone: (410)268-7705?4e?9KFor.s.Or.v.. Suit, 104 Fax: (4,0, 268:8472Annapolis, Maryland 21403
DATSt September 23, 1994
SUBJECT: Organic Data Validation for Case 22533Site: Westinghousa Sharon
'7ROM* Edgar A. Latham *v* Mahboobeh HecanicSenior Organic Data Reviewer Senior Oversight ChemistMahmoudSenior Oversight Chemist
TOi Susanna StevensESAT Acting Regional Project Officer
AATHROUGH i v Dale S. Boshart "M ESAT Team Manager
OVERVIEW
Casa 22533 was submitted to Envirosystems Laboratory (ENVSYS) forfull organic analysis* Tha case consisted of thirty-three (33) jsoil samples, one (1) trip blank that was analyzed for volatiles x-Xonly, and two (2) rinsate blanks. Tha samples vera submitted intwo (2) sample delivery groups (SDGs) . . One (1) soil fieldduplicate pair for each SDG was analyzed. Tha samples weraanalyzed as a Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Routine AnalyticalServica (RAS) .
SUMMARY
All samples were successfully analyzed for all target compoundsexcept for 2,4-dinitrophenol. All other instrument and methodsensitivities wera according to tha contract Laboratory Program(CLP) Routine Analytical Service (RAS) protocol.MAJOR PROBLEM • , . .
1 - -. • . >o Tha average relative response factor for 2,4-dinitrophenol wasless than 0.05 (<0.05) in the semivplatile continuingcalibrations dated 3/15/94 and 9/1/94. The quantitation limitfor this compound was qualified "R11 for the associated samples.See Table I in Appendix E*
«R3006li8
Page 2 of 9MINOR PROBLEMS *
o The semivolatile reextraction of sample CQR19 was performedtwenty (20) days after the date of sample collection* Althoughno technical holding time for the extraction of semivolatiles insoil samples has been established, the technical holding time ofseven (7) days for aqueous samples has been exceeded by thirteen(13). days. The aqueous sample holding time was applied;therefore, the quantitation limits were qualified "UJ" andpositive results were qualified **JH, unless superseded by the"B" qualifier. The contractual holding time of ten (I'd) daysfrom the validated time of sample receipt was exceeded by seven(7) days because the sample was reanalyzed due to surrogateoutliers. See Form Is in Appendix C, Traffic Report, and CaseNarrative in Appendix E.
o .Several compounds failed precision criteria in the volatile andsemivolatile initial and/or continuing calibrations. Thepositive results were qualified "JH, except when superseded bythe "B" qualifier, and when the percent relative standarddeviation (%RSD) or the percent difference (%D) was greater thanfifty percent (>50%), the quantitation limits were qualifiedHUJ", except when superseded by the "R" qualifier for thesecompounds in the affected samples.
o Benzo(k)fluoranthene exceeded the linear calibration range inthe cemivolatile analysis of cample CQR25. However, thiscompound was not detected in the diluted analysis. The resultwas reported from the initial analysis and qualified "J".
o In the cemi volatile analyses of camples CQR16RE, CQR19, CQR40RE,and CQR42 several compounds were detected in either the initialor reanalysec. These compound were marked with a plus sign (+)on the data summary forms (DSFc) and qualified "J", unlesssuperseded by the "B" qualifier.
o In the volatile analyses, samples CQR25, CQR32, and CQR42 hadthe system monitoring compound tolucne-dS outside the upper QClimits. Reanalyces of camples CQR25 and CQR42 produced similarresults. The MS/MSD analyses of cample CQR32 confirmed matrixinterference through internal standard responses. Quantitationlimits were qualified H0J". No poeitive results were detected.
6 The semivolatile base/neutral surrogates 2-fluorobiphenyl (S2)and terphenyl-dl4 (S3), in addition to the acid surrogate 2,4,6-tribromophenpl (S6) were outeide the upper QC limits for campleCQR25. The positive results for the base/neutral compounds werequalified «K", unless superseded by the "J" qualifier. See FormII SV-2 in Appendix E.
AR3006U9
1. ,. Page 3 of 9o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, samples CQR14, CQR23, CQR29, and
CQR3O had two (2) surrogate recoveries outside the upper QClimits on different columns. Quantitation limits and reportedresults were qualified «UJ» and "J", respectively on the DSFS.
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, sample CQR21 had one (l)surrogate recovery outside the upper QC limits on one column andanother surrogate recovery outside the lower QC limits on thaother column. Quantitation limits and Positive results werequalified HUJ" ,and "J", respectively on the DSF.
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, samples CQR26, CQR39, CQR41,CQR44, CQR45, and CQR47 had two (2) surrogate recoveries outsidethe lower QC limits on different columns. Quantitation limitsand reported results were qualified "UJ" and HJ", respectivelyon the DSFs.
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, samples CQR42 and CQR46 had four(4) surrogate recoveries outside the lower QC limits on bothcolumns* Positive results were qualified "L" and quantitationlimits were qualified "UL" on the DSFs.
o In the volatile analyses, samples CQR24, CQR29, CQR30, CQR31,CQR34, CQR35, CQR42, and CQR47 had one (l) or more internalstandards outside. the QC limits. Reanalyses of the abovesamples produced similar results for CQR29, CQR30, CQR31, CQR34and CQR42 and better QC results for samples CQR24RB, CQR35RB andCQR47RE. Results from initial analyses of samples CQR29, CQR30,CQR31, CQR34 and CQR42, and from the reanalyses of samplesCQR24, CQR35, and CQR47 were reported on the DSFs. Quantitationlimits for compounds quantitated using any of the failedinternal standards were qualified "UJ". No positive resultswere detected.
o In the semivolatile analyses, samples CQR19, CQR42, and CQR47had the internal standards chrysena-d!2 (135) and/or perylene-d!2 (1S6) outside the. QC limits. The reanalysis of thesesamples revealed similar results. Results were reported fromthe initial analyses* The quantitation limits were qualified"UJ" and positive results were qualified "J" for the compoundsquantitated using the affected internal standards. See Formvill SV-2 in Appendix E.
o In the semivolatile analyses, samples CQR13, CQR1S, and CQR23had internal standards phenanthrene-dlO (134) and/or IS5 outsidethe QC limits, while samples CQR25, CQR29, and CQR30 had IS6outside the QC limits. These samples were diluted andreanalyzed because several compounds exceeded the linearcalibration range. The internal standard recoveries for thediluted analyses were within QC limits. Quantitation limitswere qualified "UJ19 and positive results were qualified MJ",
AR300650
Page 4 of 9
unless superseded by the «B« qualifier for compounds reportedfrom the initial analyses that are associated with the affected-internal standards. See Form VIII sv-2 in Appendix E.
o In the semivolatile analyses, samples CQR40 and CQR41 hadinternal standards IS5 and IS6 outside the QC limits. Thereanalysis of these samples revealed only IS6 as an outlier.Results were reported from the reanalyses. The quantitationlimits were qualified "UJ" and positive results were qualified"J" for the compounds quantitated using IS6. See Form VIII SV-2in Appendix E. -
o Three (3) internal standards were outside the QC limits in thesemivolatile analysis of sample CQR16. In the reanalysis ofthis sample, only internal standard IS5 was outside the QClimit. Results were reported from the reanalysis. Thequantitation limits were qualified nUJn and positive resultswere qualified "Jn for the compounds quantitated using IS5. SeeForm VIII SV-2 in Appendix E.
o The internal standard IS6 waa outside the QC limit for thesemivolatile analysis of sample CQR35DL. Pocitive resultcreported from the dilution were qualified "J*1 for the compoundsquantitated using IS6. See Form VTII SV-2 in Appendix E.
o The nP" qualifier used on the pesticide/PCB Form Is denotes apercent difference (%D) greater than 25 percent (>25%) betweenthe reported results on the two (2) columns .used for theanalyses. These resultc were qualified HJ" on the DSFs. SeeForm Is in Appendix C and Form Xs in Appendix E.
KQTE3o The semivolatile extractions for camples CQR32-CQR36 and CQR38-
CQR47 were performed eight (8) dayc after the date of camplecollection. Although no technical holding time for thesemivolatile extraction of soil camples has been established,the technical holding time of seven (7) dayc for aqueous sampleshas been exceeded by one (1) day. No data were qualified due tothis minor holding time infraction because semivolatilecompounds are considered percistent in coil camples. Thecontractual holding time was met by the laboratory. See Form Isin Appendix C and Traffic Report in Appendix E.
r '
o in the pesticide/PCB analyses, coil samples CQR13-CQR20, CQR22-CQR28, CQR30, and CQR35, had several compounds that were notconfirmed by GC/KS. Compounds detected at a concentrationgreater than 330 0g/Kg must be confirmed by GC/KS according tothe 3/90 Statement of Work (SOW).
AR:iU065
Page 5 of 9o The maximum concentrations of all compounds found in the
analyses of the trip, field, and laboratory method blanks arelisted below. Samples with concentrations of common laboratorycontaminants less than ten times (<10X) the blank concentrationor with concentration of other contaminants less than five times(<5X) the blank concentration have been qualified HB" on theDSFs.
Compound Concentration
Acetone * 14 Mg/Lbis(2-etbylhexyl)phthalate * 3 J
Endosulfan I 0.016 J4,4'-DDS 0.0064 JAlpha-chlordana 0.018 J
* m Common laboratory contaminants
o TWO (2) field duplicate pairs (CQR18/CQR19) and (CQR33/CQR34)were analyzed. The results and precision estimates, excludingthe blank contaminants, are listed below:
Concentration fucr/KcrlComocupd CQRia CQR19 RPP
2-methylnaphthalene ND 79 J INacenaphthylene NO 82 J INpentachlorophenol ND 160 J INphenanthrene 1400 J 1000 J 33anthracene 300 J 200 J 40carbazole 210 J ND INdi-n-butylphthalate 180 J 820 J 123fluoranthene 3600 * 1300 J 67pyrene 2600 1500 J 54benzo (a) anthracene 1800 J 1800 J 0chrysene . 1800 J 1200 J 40benzo (b) fluoranthene 2900 1300 J 76benzo (k) fluoranthene 2600 1300 J 67benzo (a) pyrene 2000 1100 J 58indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 870 1700 J 65dibenz(a,h) anthracene 510 1600 J 103benzo (g,h,i)perylene 920 J 1400 J 414, 4 '-DDE 7.3 J Ii J 40Endrin 18 J 20 J 104,4'-DDT 42 J 41 J 2Endrin aldehyde 40 J 46 J 14Alpha-chlordane • 51 J 60 J 16Gamma-chlordane 33 J 46J 19Aroclor-1260 1300 1400 7
AR300652
Page 6 of 9
Concentration fuq/Ka)Compound COR3 3 CQR34 RPD
acenaphthylene 82 J 95 J 15phenanthrene 540 770 35anthracene 230J 250 J 8carbazole ( 150 J 220 J 38di-n-butylphthalate 120 J ND INfluoranthene 2100 2400 13pyrene 2100 J 1800 J 15benzo (a) anthracene 1400 1600 13chrysene 1300 1500 14benzo (b) fluoranthene ND 2200 INbenzo (k) fluoranthene 2300 ND INbenzo (a) pyrene 790 1200 41
concentration fug/KcrVCompound £QB2I COB34 £££>
Endoculfan I 17 J 15 J ' 124,4'-DDB 9 J 12 284,4'-DDT 16 J 19 J 17 .Endrin aldehyde 12 J 11 J 9Alpha Chlordane 14 J 17 J 19Gamma-Chlordane . 9.5 10 5Aroclor-1260 240 J 220 J 9
RPD "Relative Percent DifferenceND - Not DetectedIN - Indeterminateo Many of the samples required dilutions for the semivolatile
analysec because target compounds exceeded the linearcalibration range. These compoundc were qualified with an "E"by the laboratory. Recults reported from the diluted analyseswere marked with an asterisk (*) on the DSFc. The analyses ofcamplec CQR14 and CQR28 were performed initially at a 10Xdilution. See Form Is in Appendix C and the Case Narrative inAppendix E.
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, ceveral compounds exceeded thelinear calibration range in camples CQR13 and CQR16 anddilutions were performed. Recultc reported from the dilutedanalyses were marked with an asterisk (*) on the DSFs.
o In the pesticide/PCB analysis of sample CQR16, dieldjrin wacdetected at a concentration that exceeded the linear calibrationrange in the initial analycis. Thic compound was not reportedby the laboratory in the 20X dilution. However, an inspectionof the raw data chows the compound was present. The result wascalculated by the reviewer and the Form I corrected. Dieldrin
JIR3U0653
Page 7 of 9was reported from the diluted analysis and marked with anasterisk (*) on the DSF. See Form Is in Appendix C and thechromatograms in Appendix E.
o The laboratory indicated that samples were diluted during thepesticide/PCB analyses because high target compound levels.Sample CQR24 was analyzed at a 2OX dilution, sample CQR27 at a10X dilution, and samples CQR29 and CQR30 at a 2X dilution. Thelaboratory diluted and analyzed several other samples, however,in the reviewer's judgement, many of these dilutions wereunnecessary because the raw data did not suggest the resultsexceeded the linear calibration range. See Form Is in AppendixC and Case Narrative in Appendix E.
o Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) cleanup was performed in thesemivolatile and pesticide/PCB analyses of the soil samples.The dilution factor of two (2) required by this procedure wasaccounted for in the analytical procedures used by thelaboratory.
o Non-spiked compounds, other than blank contaminants, weredetermined in samples CQR18, CQR32, and the MS/MSO analyses ofthese samples. The results and precision estimates are asfollOWSX
Compound COR18 CQR18M3 CQR18MSD %RSP
2-methylnaphthalene ND ND 130 J INphenanthrene 1400 J 1000 1400 18anthracene 300 J 240 J 300 J 12carbazole 210 J 170 J 200 J 11di-n-butylphthalate 180 J 180 J 200 J 6fluoranthene 3600 3600 E 4500 E 13benzo (a) anthracene 1300 J 1500 1800 10chrysene 1800 J 1400 1800 14benzo (b) fluoranthene 2900 2400 2600 10benzo (k) fluoranthene 2600 1400 2400 30benzo (a) pyrene 2000 1600 1800 11indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrena 870 850 790 5dibenz(a,h) anthracene 510 ND 300 J 95 +benzo(g,h,i)perylene 920 J 880 890 2
4,4'-DDB 7.3 J ND ND IHEndrin aldehyde 40 J 33 J 6.9 J 65Alpha-chlordane 51 J 47 J 8.6 J 66Gamma-chlordane 38 J 35 J 6.7 J 65ATOClor-1260 1300 1100 240 64
A'R3U065I».
Page 8 of 9CQR32 COR32MS CQR32MSD %Rgp
phenanthrene 970 1000 1000 2anthracene 160 J 190 J 200 J 11carbazole 250 J 250 J 250 J odi-n-butylphthalat e 790 850 920 8fluoranthene 2700 2800 2800 2benzo (a) anthracene 1300 990 1000 16chrysene 980 1300 1200 14benzo (b) fluoranthene 1700 ND ND INbenzo (k) fluoranthene ND 2600 2600 0 +benzo(a)pyrene 200 J 660 780 56indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 420 ND ND INdibenz (a,h) anthracene 230 J ND ND INbenzo(g,h,i)perylene 160 J ND ND IN
Endosulfan i 18 21 17 J 114,4'-DDE 6 J 7.2 J 6.5 J 9Endrin aldehyde 14 J 14 J 13 J 4Alpha-chlordane 3.6J 3.8J 3.3 J 7Aroclor-1260 250 J 260 J 220 J 9
%RSD - Percent Relative Standard Deviation+ - Relative Percent Difference (RPD) instead of %RSDND - Not DetectedIN « IndeterminateE - Result exceeded the linear calibration range
o In the MS/MSD volatile analyses of samples CQR18 and CQR32, oneI . (1) out of ten (10) spike recoveries were outcide the QC limits.
o In the MS/MSD semi volatile analyces of cample CQR18, one (1) outof eleven (11) relative percent differences (RFDs) and two (2)out of twenty-two (22) spike recoveriec were outcide the QClimits.
o In the MS/MSD semivolatile analyses of sample CQR32, two (2) outof eleven (11) RPDa and five (5) out of twenty-two (22) spikerecoveries were outside the QC limits.
o In the MS/MSD pesticide/PCB analyses of sample CQR18, six (6)but of six (6) RFDs and six (6) out of twelve (12) cpikerecoveries-were outside the QC limits.
o in the semivolatile analyses, several samples had one (1) or two(2) surrogate recoveries outside the upper QC limits. No datayere qualified. Surrogate recoveries for diluted camples weredesignated with a "D" by the laboratory. The extractionefficiency/method accuracy cannot be verified. See Form II SV-142.
AR30065S
Page 9 of 9
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, several samples had one (l)surrogate recovery outside the QC limits. No action was taken.
o In the pesticide/PCB analyses, the MSD analysis of sample CQR18had four (4) surrogate recoveries outside the lower QC limits onboth columns. No action was taken.
o / In the pesticide/PCB analyses, the surrogate decachlorobiphenyl(DCB) had a retention time outside the established window forseveral samples because of matrix interference. No action wastaken. vi ' . • •
o The retention times for internal standards IS5 and IS6 wereoutside the upper QC limits in the semivolatile analysis ofsample CQR35. Results for the associated compounds werereported from the dilution and marked with an asterisk (*).
o Several internal standards were outside the QC limits in the .semivolatile MS/MSD analyses of samples CQR18 and CQR32. Nodata were qualified.
o The tentatively identified compounds (Ties) in Appendix D werereviewed and corrected during data validation* Compoundsidentified as blank contaminants, target compounds of anotherfraction, aldol condensation products, or phthalates werecrossed off the TIC Form Is.
All data for Case 22533 were reviewed according to the National \Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analyses with x-Xmodification for use within Region III. The text of the reportaddresses only those problems affecting usability.ATTACHMENTS .
1) Appendix A - Glossary of Data Qualifiers2) Appendix B - Data Summary Forms. These include:
(a) All positive results for target compoundswith qualifier codes where applicable*
(b) All unusable detection limits (qualified "R").3) Appendix C - Results as Reported by the Laboratory for All
Target Compounds4) Appendix D.- Reviewed and Corrected Tentatively
Identified Compounds5) Appendix ff - Support Documentation .DCN:EL409A01.WES •
.WJU0656
GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIER CODES (ORGANIC)
CODES RELATED TO IDENTIFICATION(confidence concerning presence or absence of compounds)
i i U - Not detected. ,The associated number indicates^-^ approximate sample concentration necessary to be detected.
NO CODE - Confirmed identification.
B - Not detected substantially above the level reported inlaboratory or field blanks.
R «. Unusable result. Analyte may or may not bepresent in the sample. Supporting data necessary to confirmresult.
N • Tentative identification* Consider present.Special methods may be needed to confirm its presence orabsence in future sampling efforts.
CODES RELATED TO QUANTITATION(can be used for both positive results and samplequantitation limits):
J - Analyte present. Reported value may not beaccurate or precise*
OK - Analyte present. Reported value may be biasedhigh. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L - Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actualvalue is expected to be higher.
UJ - Not detected, quantitation limit may be inaccurateor Imprecise.
UL - Not detected, quantitation limit ic probablyhigher.
OTHER CODES
N J • Qualitative identification questionable due to poor reoolution.Presumptively present at approximate quantity.
Q - No analytical result.
AR300657
MIII
I
J 8SS•« <••8 S
|
i sI «M
• . .O
I liasflj .,„,.„„,,,,,,,,,»
1
1 Sort* Ma. |
cattt |
eoau |
ca§37
1 Dilution Factor |
1.0 1
1,0 j
1.0
4* 3
a *1 .
M 3
I. IIt • S '*•
S 3
S
I
J
G
••
w
"•
^
Af
4
13\l\t
I
\-
O.|._
Chlorc«ttMM
-
3!o'o
3-G __ .
3*ta,
IJI I
i|
i7•
«*
Jv^
__*loul 1,2-OictUarc«tJMfM , _
CUwofoM
1
!,
__*1.1.l~1rlcliUrootlMM ___
•CoVbMi Totncfclorld* ____
__ iroMdlcfcloroMlfcoM
' =
Dl!D3iD.
-
CML - Contract
Roiyilrod «uontftatfon ll*tt
'Action L*Ml ExUu
SCE KAUUTIVE fot COM
fief INITKMS
rwl»«iOr/M
or
£ X— tk
S S
M
r
IM
W
I \- .«
?
I
H
S8
O«• f
o<
1 ***** *»• L__«»« __ |
I tllutlon Factor 1
1.0 ___
1 LtKatlm
1 ta-4
1
4* S
< SM 5
w £iig a
i- "..
4 B
|
N
> «^B
™
—
1
~
^«.31!u •-1
mf m tm
1• 1a i
a "*
a ••i
i
•iEl•»^
j1
§1iii — _
4*Matfcyl-2-ptfitanona __
___
T Mmxmruut*
\
_, *
Totractiloroattiana
. __ 1,1.2,2-T*tr»c»loro4rth«m _
•Toluana 1
_.„, •Ethvtbaniona
4*
J
*
e1 o' o1 o' o1 e' o1 o' o' o1 o1 o* o1 o' o' e1 o1Q _ 1- . - _ - -
t
1
Is*- K.* °
S
CKOL • Contract
ftaqulrad Oumtltatfon LMt
*Actlon laval Exlata
SEE HARMTIVE f
nH.100659
2 3
I,,II!
J4
jIV Afl4rt
I ,I 3
ni
1
ft.
I
Si
Mi
§
95f
I"
Ss
5 £
2*
o
1
I
2 a
2s
o
r
»l tu
t Ion fa
ctor |
X Nolaturo |
• « • ',
'-.*
5'*-3 I 3 *
s
i-
i
,
B 5
I
j
I
43i
'
i•i
|i5 i1o'c
'
••
Matfcy
tojia CMorlda
|
19*
J
Ia
J _ . 1.1-»lcMoroaUMna
*
1
jiJ
o1
__ loul 1,2-»tcfcloroaUona _ |
0*
13
0'
, 1*2-»lcMoroatlMna .
o*1
=1
=?
3
I
J0*
I1
14.1
Jo1
4k15
io1
1
o'
-
i3
S.2
**isiiIr<
oVOUDO
ot
§ s
I *II**I£ %
-* IM S
Itatlon
liafts:
*noUtur*)/100)
| __ CQR21 ___ |
Ii JIs 1-^ To 5
Is85 S:0 J S «jl
** 14Oi crK
VJg;M
!rf
1 fi"
Pl* *«
• L.««w _ J
1 BItutlon Factor | __ 1.0
I
3 S!
]§, ,h
"S§M
8? ft! M 2 I S~ .a !? 9 S§ I i Ii 5 u. 8
-*M aj!» w S"Mi!
•s,
•ie2s
"•'
"•
1 XHoiaturo
1 Location
1 1 ICML
COM
POUND
I-*-—
1
1?N*
Oi
M M
I I 1 1
M M
M M
1 1 1
1
I
1 1 1
1 1
la*1.3-»lchloropropcna
1
rlchlorotthana
'
IbroMchloroaathana
i
,1,2-TrlcMorcwtfc.m = __ J
MM
I I I !
1 I I 1
M M
1 1
I I 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 I I
aniana
rrom*1A3-Olchloropropena __
trowfora
L-Hathyl-2-pantanona ___^_
I N I
i l
i l
l l
l l
l
l
]
IIn'i i1
1
1 1
V
1
1
1
1
hi i• *', M: N*• ** 4—t *
I I
1
1
1
I7
1
M M
1
1
|
fi
1
1
1
1
\
\
I I I
\
\
511
o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o1"rnjj"! i i i i i i ijj i i
1 M M
•
1
1 1 |
t
1 1
1
1
1
1
|l*5S1]Ul A|
IKsii£
y
i
«*53Ss••1I!**?tt
a
13t2
•* o35 _-* » »9si i.11Is* S 9|: §.* U — i ««
5 5 8 cO 3• ra c
i:
.,J.i*a *•
Is
b
f!a-
\
1..
>• ,'*" 23
ril
• ft*
"s,
'» *M
o.
"l
-
"l
*" sS
•/•••i!IIM
Ii,
_ - _ __
^ _ — • _ .
3* 3* 3- 3*
41,1,1
3' ~
_i!___
3'
3'
« — « _
«•*
<•••
— — -
•. «
-3ii__jjj:
•1 4 M tf ••
ila's'Fa'a'a's1? !1
3*
''
,'
i• ^ 0 f "3! ill:.
3'
11'!1it i3*1
i 1 *f - 8 s^- "1- 1^ 1133?3iilJ»-'*-**5-*r;*-"3S
_-.-__ ___J.-!-|J--JJfl*"" V "Q" " "IJ * 1
^" «
*
*• AlH
«••
—
-
,
4BHI
-
-
-
—
-
M
«•
—
••
--
i?•a m
^I
2S
11
1sii1!1
!I a il5!iitii = !imi !
I jrt X * i = * .S a *_"_*« A _*,!._" .1 i - 31 ^-X
I ,I j
CM
O
o
•«
Or
I
S 85 5IfuO vf t,O 4*
fl
I
*•i 45 I
^
i
i
RS
Ow
1
RS
S
I
J£1
aV
e«•
a*
o*•
4»••
«?•»
O
o
1
Dilution Factor |
vv<
v»V
S
•
o>
•M
-
S|
* Nolaturo |
KVM
*H
M
5
g
g
^
O
sI
.
*S
8
iii3
3
,2-Olchioropropono ___
__ I
n»
' :
•i
0*
3
3
1IT
0*
=
I
o'
:
,1.2-TrlcMaroathana ___
0» 0»1
=
rron_-1,3-Dlchloroprap*n* _
0'1
=
I
e"1
;
3
3
Htathyl-2-pontonona ____
»'1
i1 a
=
,0'
' =
1 g
ratrachloroataona
e'1
1 g
^
3
!12
e'
;
3
o*
*2
Jso'
3
'
Ethvlbaniam
e'
'g
3
4*
o1
.U
=
|
7O
o11
'
'
Vl
M
§1•- iC
Mj{sM.
S
I
S
COUDVJDCD
1 cr
**^ •sII!s•1
* s
I
il
II I ' JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJIIZ ? 7 ' • 3 °
|1 M«. 515 J
I I I I I I I II ii —i —i—i —i —J—i —— —;~T~T-™—— O
\J
I
I
** m
I Si ~* «i j
i* i V 2 * 2 Ji
9 *
8 *«
1-a to,O *
!::u4
A
"s,••
r
"3
i
t
'5
1
•lal'-*
f**-JUS— jfillj;iJI"a
'••I
~ l j -----------
*••
3. •m, -
|jI!il
"
'
j1 3* 3' 3'
-F—
. ••
' — • ———
————
. . Vinyl CMarlda
__ CnloroaUkona
|_
Itetovlana Oilarf*
3'
3'3'3'3
! _ Acatona
1 _ . _
Carbon Dlaulf Ida
1 __ 1.1-»ldilorotUMfM
o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o1
i|
J0*
'
3
'
3I3I 3I313I
«_1 __ Total 1.2-OlcMoraatiiana _
;0
I,,
, Cidaroforai
jI0_| __
1,2-Dlcnloraatiiona
A
1a1 IO
J __ 1,1,t-THcAlorMUm ___
WJ __
Carbon Tatracalorlda __
__I0_|__
OroaodldiloroaatiMna __
__•
4BB -
VE
UDU?CD
1
1 ^
• ' o«
^
4O
^
&a.
IM
4*III^
*»<^e>
ii§
o
** ** 9£ 0"a ~w M
11Iila9" oo C
?j. • a
1*. s|s|•
•
S
•1 3
§ "
?n4.
l
'!•
«tlngnous* Sharon
533
SanpUno
Dotott):
* RJ*•Ii »
i3S
11
iis5i
i
e
a^
ei
e
49
O
e
a
s
Dilution Factor |
i
^
s
4D
'in
s
fc
X Kolatura |
)CM
S
B
s
5,
§
|
*»
40
55
,•
%~ o.
$•
£6
i
i
M
3^C ^C •
,2-Olchloropropana
1
la-I.S-Dlchloroprapona
_._ 1
rlchloroathom
1lhrnMM
Iar<M**KMM
1
o'o'o'o
t's'jls1
i !i I1 ?
'o 'o1
3*
!0*
3'
3*
k-Motnyl-2-pantoriona ____
i
e
3'
31
,of
3'
3'
ratrachloroatoom
o>
l
3'
1a1
-
3
3*
o1
3'
3*
_ ,
|
fi
0*
3
3'
1HI
0*
3
31
M
o1
3'
31
1
o1
,
g|N> C
MI*0Smm
1HI
inu>\JDCD
:x
1
3J*»
Ift.I
1
* r§1!i 1a w
Is
ti
1 a••
I ~* m5 2? 3
** !0»-
s.a * '
i," s« a
1 2 s
I* a
i1*a;
c _
1
1
3
3
!!_.S
I
••
ami mm mm mi
3am* ' am* *» *4 *•m *•*• mt
JJJ:
f
* J
g
3* 3* 3*
-
I's's's'a'is'i!?
l - «•Myjj
I^
J
I
•
J
|
jjNJ
-
mm
4BI
31 3* 3* 3*
-
M
J
i*jj]|
jj_.•• mm
mm mm* mm
•
-
-
_
—
•
i
si
2 8•
o
o
s
W
O
1
0-3-94
Sanpllno Dato(a
t
I !
a*
S » . . . . .
£ •§.-
§0.
' *"8 "
I:
1C
i
rii8
"iu S§ "SMt
Sis
I I IJ I I I I IJ I I I I I I I I
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ I I I I I M I
IJJJJJJJJJJJJ I I I I I
* I I IS
«| asI'llfl55
i s J
jf IM S Wuffa*1-'*^***!***-^'"'-**"!*1"•• JJJ
'a'o1rrr TI "rrrn \ \ \ \ "j j' e1 o1 o1 o1 o1 «' o1 o1 o1 e1 a1 a1 a1 a'
s
I
4b ^
1
a *5 5•K U.
* S5 I•« -•$•"r
5s1
: 1
ii*•J ,!' I
j:5 a1
3
»ji a
,
«» 3mm
- \\* its«•
~
mm
mm
1a1
mmi
am
•
—
"•
~
ami
1
tl3 fii4 M
JJa1 a1
*
'
Illjsis 1a1 77 a1
1^
ifJJo'o'
ic
o1" ~Q ~~ "GJTl
1
^a
3,1ii|t •*IN*
__ bU(2-CUoro4>tiM*y)atUun* _
„ ,
2.4-DfchloroBftonal
\
.'__
1.2.4-frlchlorobaiwona ___
, ....
Maphthalana
4-tiiloraanlllna
JJ_ 1 L l
I?
CROL • Contract totvilrodyantitotlon Llalt
•Action Lovol
fjtlata
...
SEE IUUUUTIVE fOR ODE DEHNIT
. •
- ^
. -
ravlaad 07
C
C
flHJ
t)06
68 'V
I
Mb 9 i i i i f i i i i i i i i i i i i . —; —: —; —; —; —- V»f O
aom>ta quwitfUtion Ha
(CRDL * Dilution Fac
£
J
< a
* jjiMI•Is
< 5w a
N I I* I i40
OMp
33o
II»- C
ME DEFI
*v1»«d
X
IJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
JJJJJJJJJJJJ-UJ I I I I I I I I I
*
£
JJJJJJJJJJJ.
JJ_
5
i lIJf
11
1 1
I I I Is'JJJ
I I I I I UJ I UJJJJJJ
'SSt— •'-•S— ?
i
I*IstiEntmia. £ ** C * *• * 3 ** 4fmf V mm • *• >^ O. <C >p A
1
1"i!^^srfffrf?-I?^« i-2* •* o « J 3^? 8<<?£'*. ±TJ?^.v>N*AiNa«N*m4(^4aN"S<4Vifc<4r«' if
~ I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
i 4* I • § 'I'l'n'i Gijnn DDDnDnjjjjIff va*
s
ii
S i•3^ m,
S 5i i
rM
i3
I"5s
i ?
I 3•*
i ,"m J
mtt m
mm m
!:*\f
mm>t
'
'.
«a 3
- v 21a 1 2rnJ ' ** *
< 3«• 3
( ^ m lmt JB
ILJl! J'1;T
"*•!k
1
. ' 1
2
m
j.
• /
__ *-ir«"*4*4»iyl-ph«iylalWr __
.•HaMcajlorobaniana
_ _V«nt*diloroc4Moot
__ Mionanthrana
Antiirocana
_ Corbaiolo
A1 -A-but*l__.tk*Ut*
}
-......• _ U
*• 5
ij.i;'j f 3 Me f «2 * cI l J a v J
" 21|la'o'a'o'o'o'o' o'a'o'o1
^
n
__ bla<2-EtliyU»axn)f*tJiBUt« .
__ Dl-n-octylptetliaUta ___ _
__•«MA/M4I LM-4A»k_-
__ OaniodOf l
uorantlMna ____
s's'sV
—
a'
•
-
AN
t
—
^
1^
^
^
•M
mm
--
I
II
™
•SH>a
§$_»
31
3i5I
is1II1w.
CDr*+u>o
i
I '
I wH
! -2 -*I I
S Sii -.— v fstb orO ** uIi _.• I s•s - $ 'I >: ** •*«•H i«o — o- 5 8 '•
<*> cs cs:
* fcs:
s •Va
sc ciSo^
^ e§?
a82 «£.• 5
ll
SanpUBo. |
Dilution Factor |
o• r*
"1 :
» _." <» _ ;55
k*.1 i
< s !• I-s i• s J? Z s * 1s 1 s s j*l 5 y- 5 3
,5• •
§ § £ 5wi s u. 8-
l
j"s ...
e
"sM
M
*
$ §S B R
j
._ _ _ J _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
._ U _
,
7 i1 f
IlllllilliSf]sflllflf Ml : 1Af^aa-a«: * « ** S P ' i *«•* J6 • * • J ' » J ' ' ~ * H t l ^ ~ ** * r < N l t n l < ? S « i > ?
U .
-----.----^U
- § w
s--J- • i i i i t ui*r J J J * **> m* .„
.
.
•
• 51 «S £ S
-I- i 1 '1M-- . I1? 1 ? *SB* vf?sili i? CJ ? * JB S **t « -* CM" •& o *j* • _ > . . 9 i . U
' o1 a1 o1 e' e' o1 *
CD_Z>r.
i
.233|JJl
M
I 4*
5 IVI U
9 * in
•51 I JJJJJJJJJJJJJl'JJJJJJJJ I III4. *» **> -• •• ^ . K«* 41itii.Iso. P
-»?i
« «y
a
i.S.
33
e a
§S5tOS
JSs"l1 1
•• >c§
ll
»i&a 3 Sio V 5 tJi1" 3 ?r e 2 3
!.§__
1
1^Is»: *: f ? J |5. ? | .*. ? l •*. l• ? J f *
JJjllljjljljjIjJJJJJJJJJ
„
1* r' •
3 8
M mm
51
li-.
M
i f;
*A
!
§0« «—. f. Of
o-§o.-.£
S s s S e
jjji•
M i l l I J J I I M I J I J I I I IJJJ I JS ™™ -™*! ™™ " *™ " ^ " ^ — " ™™ * ~™ ~ ^ m ™ ~™~
J_—_1<*!?i
S S"". W M. •-. S.S s's
9 S
I 1 1 18 8 g 8 S g'C S3 S = * 5rJJJJ Ji
CO
5 s' s'ijjjjjjii:jjjjjjj i U 11w . I "T iT i i i i i i i i i i i i i i • • • • -™1™" § 81 I I e o
-* i 5 8 I I- -g S J3 S S g §"rlllJJJIlJ. f*f*. «.
e S S St P*5. K. K. R. 5.
„
S!JJJ
luf S. 1. §.JJJJJJJJJJaUJJJJ.
i
Hi1
* •
JJs s 11 §'n n 8!
e § sDlfJJJJJJ.
8 § §R. g. 1
UJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ IJLf
JJJJJiiJJJjJJjjJjjj,'«'Is
2
M.
s-^. .u.... ,«.„.u.... ,«.„. • . - _,
II
« « l i5 A i 51! lifSSi^ajlf«i»««S£?l-»«*<*?*- ••v • e u U A j f • w w —i
« K I » 2 - T 2 S S 5 a _ _ ^ t ^ ^ I Z 3 ^ — E B S * 1 ^
I S••I5 * s s s' 1 ' '
11
r*
31
1H«*
i2
=?fi ii ,i J
. Ta calculata aacpla cpantltatlon lUftt:
<«**• • Hlutlan factor / ((100 -
tool *tur«)/ 100)
is =o
2
1 2 «
!i'o•
9 §ft * * E
a
3-^mm mm t
Ljj.fii-* M! —
a
t
;o
5
a**•
3M ,
M.
a*
*S1
• -
J
iI_ 3J A2
2-j._
J...
— ""-•-•
f 1 1 1g f j i
JJi"
___ Li
L.'- ' ""
• — —
• — —
-~ "T
1 l
ll4 •£ *& Oill I.KMl-N-i, a, a, a, a,
. x
- —
s.i]JJ2233
—
i
-
1
J
m*
mt
\
— — mm
1
•
mm ^
J
—
1
™
i i?i jB mm mm mm •
252^1N- 2 ST -^ at
39 9 S B* » 1 IJ 1
mm
—
8
1
i
mm>
™
mm
99
mm •mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
35ik3
§SM>
_
»
*•
|SiSi1w2S•i
! O
o'O
• smt O
"i
M—• m• 22 |wl.io C
I
I
^ j * » • - • • i • • • • • *• o
calcul
ution f
S
I II I
Ii
8
S5«
!JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJjjjjjf|SI
§1
w
MJJJJJJJjjjjj 1 1 1 1 1 m i la
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i
JJJJJJJJJJ U I I I I I I I I
.jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj LIJ isv~ I
sl___________________IJ IJJJJJ U I I I I I I
I IJ I I III UJ
nilS S Ms u
I I I I I I I I Is' I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
£!$?|
5 £ i i - t - fI-J S i 1- I _! i
I I I
f.la •* •S I i E. —'- 4 E ^ ' * K ' f V - 9 f i « S i — XJ5~o.»j;*e-— * - ^ * P - * B P ! P O f l ^ Pl l f > F i [ w w F ~ ~ 4 t g > C ' - * a f c E 5 ^ ** *. ?_S
J 85"'lrlr I I ]? €. 5 lS.5 • 1 5 •>. * J e£
aII» w K R w e P»I Bf «(i , «, »(w *( »,»-, »•>, *n( «i "i
iJ*•
ju jj jj jjjij
Is'lsflJJJ-1 u
jjjjjj_Ul I I I I M I I IJ
JJJJJ_ _JJJ_JJJJJJJJlJJJJ-J
•JJJJJ]
JJJJ_
JJ3__
S, £._3 5 jt rf S -.J 5 r 5 .• f.If-1JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ. • •
!*
i
1
II 1ao
i .I J
Italian Haiti:
-*ol*tura)/100)
|
.CQR410E
3* 8 Sa C 5
• **
To calcula
L * Dilution fa
1 00109
§
• 1
i
Jh7 '
..j'ii(9*mf
m
a
" " KW
O* "a
5*B
S s5(
e9
-S
H" S £
•
1
- *
?il* S
s e s* 3 «••[ W mt
j*J1
•
»
K
i
i j» £ «£ 2 N ••
j
!l :
1 -* mf _, J
i*«li1 f ° S ,1 •* N -C «• » • >
•
i• t(iF|!_ C* Jr
__ -MHtraao-dl-n-propylaBlna _,
Haiiachlorotthana
ml
*
1 1
i **at
I!*
SIi ?• •*2 M*
g, J
5
__ 1,Z,4-Trldilorebaniana ___
..
Naohthalam
g
S
S
§' §' 8* «' S1 S1 s' s' §' g1 g1 g1 g' g1 g' g' g1 g' g'i i i wi i i wi "i i i t i i i i i i i ' i
$
«
NMMUTIVE
F
S
£
g
**
|i t
•
IM
§
*A
I1' ** ?5I , gH
1 ..
i j
Ta calculata aMpla
quantltatlon Haiti:
(CML * Ollutlan factor /
((100 - taolatural/100)
29 *
!=
;;;IS:
o'
M * '
is s
' X
/3
•»"sN
"3
» -
"5
UJ3nss" U S mt
If!1a'.
I
^
•
2 S 35 •_>
P
,.
i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ U „ """"".i
mm^ _i
mm
mm
J
P—
M
mm
mm
1
'
^«•
a
i
1
i
mm
—
J.
1
1*1 ^
|
3 *C "C 83 7 7 §
JJJJJ.i 3|3,l
H
IJ
i ^Hl ™
J
**
I
^
8
~
^
1
JIf :.6-OtnlirotoliMna
Iimt l•» I
1 <
.3
e1 _C
*
-I-I-I-I-I-I4-
i mm*,
'••
mt
*
i
4mm
9~
i mmt
i
S
<«
I
)Uttrif_iU_,UU
k
'
mm
—
-
"
1•
1 , -^
' mm
_
•
2
«*m
3*
^
H
mm
l,6-»lnltro-2*Mttiyl|-Mnal _
mmm
mmm
mm
mmm
mmm.
mm
mm
-
-I-U-I-I-
mm
mm
**
Oft CODE DCF1NITIONS
r*vlMd 07/90
s*•
3
mf
T3Jmt
SI«J
• '
R:<U0678
ta 00o quantltatlon
100 •
tool itu
in
S15 =
«l
T i
f*a
I
••I .- :M a
MJJ^JJJJJJJJiS'i'JJJJll!I S 2 S S SlUjVn
gs °.«.= 8
JJJJJJJ I I I I I I I Is'JJJJJJll
IS §1 si **ii.I.s.i.i.l.
*- »c
^i&I8Su.s
.!** _t• a i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i t i i i | | | . j0 g J ^J-J-J —J _>-J »Ji «J J _J _«_-J __i _J i. __1_! J~* _I_I ~1 _l_| JS
!l8
tt.
IITl
s s cmvnJJJ I IJ I I I t I I I IJ I UJ I I I I I
j85«-i
£'2s5£111
S s 8
_JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ. 1 1 1
S s1 e1 o1 § SS. g % 8. a 8. Illi l lm m I ' MS s a ° s e
Z M S M
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IJ UJJJ I
U
' 1 ' ' ' 1U
1
i.'JJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
I IISi1Ti
331i
on^il1oil;* •• 5 2f g * -J — M
IJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJI 5 9 K K ——• K M'
£
I I
g-g'II §§8
^ I JJJ I
II
IHHllfi
,' I I IJ UJ I I
2« vix —
IS.II
I • I I*• * V t•**•*•*
IMIiJlItllH*C & f-f X w •Ml g A •¥. _* * X£ l i 3 f i ? £ 2 f £ * * £ £ ? * - ? i g!!lll|j|ll!:illl!illl
JJ.j£3t§§[$t§§!&i3Rf3RR£f3Rgggggg**i *\ "i i "i "i "i "i rti Mi wi i i i i »_! _! _j ' _j i
^ tI.i* * ••« B •*
|HJf mm mm
|llUi« * ** ** *#!l!
* •
* •
Imt «•*
i
2 35
f*
1r.i 1
*mm mm 9
to-- !
§• «*• r
3 * *
f* c»• «»
So
ij!a
>
>
Q ._ '
3
.8'
1
'
'
L ;!.___-:S1
i
1 1
/
J-
I1
5ji fill3252
JJJJJ
1Iff.fdI I
-•Vo'o'a'g'a'a1 . a ' i ' a ' a a l l
J
1
18
Ii1
,,
- IJ- "
i-Mltroc-Mnal
|
l
•la(Z-OilaraotJMi(y)Mtlwna _,
L4-0ldilonf-Mnal
4-l-l-l-M-l
1
_,
*
18.1*
I
$M
1-i?3! O
SEE
lon
yal
Ou_nt I
tat
raa)
act loqMlrad
t taportad f
OWL *
0'680
C
J
8
ng D«t*(
I gM
i 4
5 J
2 §"a
il11Isw^ wo C
f;* ti!lii
ft
1:
I:
I:
a c8 *•
2 *
j
SvpUKo. |
Dilution Factar
1
3
•s
* W*
S
«
"f
M
5
"l
5
s
1
1
K
mm mm mm m
o5
lanadilarabutadlana
'-Oiloro-3-MtfeylplMnol __
-Natnylnaphthalana _^ ___
8[<«[8
v mm mm mmm
j
111
mmf
f
<
H
•
.
iiiS,'
mmm
I1
§,'
B
I|£<o
§!
—
8
ml
m
§i
mmm
I
<
•c
3'
•*
§,'
^
M
*
s,'
Jg
,t
—
Li*0lnltrototum
«{
mmt
HathvlBhtlMlata
s!
i
i<
•••
§!
31
•
4
4i
8.
1:** 1
• mm
1
>
i
••
•
£,
—
i?
Jjj8SS§£
**•s
•ct Raqulrod ouantltatlan Hi
t Rtportad Fr*- Ramalyala
11• •r
• 9
_• 9^ J'
J s
n\
?}**ji I
--' iQ
3
• **
*,
3
IJJJJJJJJJJJJJllljlJ11 §""-U
rav
NJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJi ^j
IJ
!&-__-_-*_j« mf mtf:J2
2
8|In
-
J.
iJ
n
S.1
J.
*•
3
j_ ijjj_ ijjJil^JJJilil^Ji
2"l
I IJ I I
JJ
••
3 ill
sIi8M
§1DDD^JJJJJJJ,Smm mmm* mmm mmm mmm. .mm •mmm, mm
ii ii3D3_
o _a
a m.
mt U
~ I* F2 S II 2 5 Sjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
rt_ 1*1. *rt (•f ^ rt •*•-
0682
R
act Racpilrad
tltotlan
t d Fro*
ftaanalyal
J
L -
+ •
S
<k>O
A
/
J
Maumm
a<
MIUa•*u
Xml
a. -*•
>>
I
^i
*• 5mm +t
5251mt "M5 .2
I;* G
I"
382
!i§js *? B.
S« «^l -
* i.:M IA 1
•a Sharon
Coupling Data(a>:
$anplo«o.
il1 EA Oiao
I ••£ *
^ I
'
o •
< «w S
>r I |£• v 2sB, ii•
< 3w S
• sg15 Iisi; •i^•
a
I
j§
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n••M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 II
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 - 1.J as \1 '
Jl±,m.i.,\
1 *
I I
!M!i<iiH*iU|iiH'• Z-o ft £<£»«•>!
I I M I M I Issesesssesa a a a o o o( o o a
j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r!-• -
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M M I I I
M MI
j i i jf1 *'S o• •
L.______°ii &..,,,,..
* *t! 1 ll«t 1- a <N mm ' i M mt JB
i f l i f f !£5|T S • J5 * «j_^«' » » S •* !?»**•»CC « C « ' C C r w i y < « t t i * # : iu it* •
j l l l l l l l l jooooaooo»
>,0.0.0i0i°l€'i0i0l0i
1
1
1
3'
{
IJS
1
|
3'
I
'Io1*t
1
1
i
mf
•OikIf'IO1
I
1
31
Kk1\
a1~i
1
|
3*
Si
11a1i
1
1
|
|
?'
2t
{1
0*
1
]-
1
3'
S&x'la't
]-
|
1
3'
2.}\?l
1
|
31
ikx
a'i
1 ?
— — ——
i
revised 07j
1
fr
COCOUD
•^cc
.
**•s
Irad Quwitltatlon LU
f*sI•1
3 I1 1 3.M «•-
3 J
• c 3 ,a-" nf ** O •:i1
^ S 9 •• e
!:K.!:mmm mmm
3 4 e3 *" S
U lUMt WMtlnokeuM
Snaran
w1
•• *i
22533
Sapling
»ata<a>i «-2-W - *-3-fi
*Rl«
!*••
1 __ WIS ___ 1
MRtt 1
cu»
Dilution Factor 1
1.0/W.O
_j
1.0
1 i.n
Sas9
3,
Sa!_3S2,| 1§
«* *is :*
C«
a
S3
* HoUtura 1 7
lacatlan 1 101
'..
' '
1 "
-1
ML
COMPOUND
j
J J J_-
i i i i
Imt'
U O~ U O4 o 3 9 J
JJJ. - .'K* K1 (J I*.1 K* *
mm «
N «f
m •
>
j' =MB
; =•• «*
mm
"» t
= S
t -mf mm
M
• j
•k
[1 =i'.mm mm
eK
» -i— ' mm
» -1B mm a'3m mm'.•» '3• mm.a'3• mmm'3• H^ 1a
S
| 1 .,
1 J
3 *T- jn M
- - - - j:
_,
2
mm ^
» i i | i
S 9
_,.y.i.]j.j! jj
J
J
•
1«»*J
131
JM
5
^r *4>1-3 s4 31
•» -t -• '••
Ja-I
g
1
L
3'
J
a
f
Jm
J
3
3 3I"iPJJ
.
3'
ISe
I
•
^
a 1J'3
J
ai *
i
31 3* 3* 3* 3* 3*
js"111
1
mmm f ^
1
1I
*
- 3
Ji °°3 o~-%
I SM *CT
:i
__ | MO |
utad analyaaa
3!- 3
e3
mt ' -
-3I"Ss}
32ikkiiniII!!!!!!!!!?JJJJJJJJJJJf3*:*:fia5aa.a1saj
S S
s9
I;2 SIs1.1
Umm
MIII W
*N
-I•- C
= 1*'is if*. . . >ev
^ mmm m m21211l
I
1 I
RJ
SS
sN9
i
J
f
:
e.
a•a
o
o3
o• •
1
Dlliitlen Factar
j
»••
Nmm
o>
£
in
•*
mt
3
in«
^M
S
g
M
OM
!S1
-.
3 3
4*4* k
«
ik i
^
-i
3
V
..
,
'
1
*
^
M«•
,B
2
S M SlltfotO ,
Q!
•i
&
§^
•1
.
3
«
3
^
fc
j
S
"•
»"•1
i
••
,
e•<
-i
X
§r
i
«_,
m
{o
33
Mft
33
2
.
jA
I
iJE
2
inGOCD
i *
I ! ' S M « S - 5^5» 's'^l^^fill^^fc^illl
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJI I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I 1 wl ^1• '• • * * • * " ' mm. mm. mm mm mm ml **l M! mm ml mt £ I **l "l ***! **l I I
"l *"l "l *"l ""l *"l *"l *"l "l *l *l "l I I I I I I I \J * I I I _J__1 J__]
s. _|35ifII J_AO w
I rs »
-«*
j:'-I93
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ II I 2
C
1 15
33
53
_j„•' T1"1"""1
o ISa^ S * 3 mm
_
f I
f
IDSj'ii*O ** «*• • « 4}*• "S x
I-
_
5
-1J1-
*It_r ••
2
,
i
S ii
JJ
S_J
J
339^31m. 5 S S 3 mm
a
• T T T T j » 1_...,. .............. ....Hk,,k,S
1 l ' jjJ44Jjjj jjj n !-i ^f »^l -^| _^| -f t ^P t ^-W __-_* ^i * ^» ^1 *^f fci fci * mm. i -^* _^> fc^ i f ^f ^' fc" mmW.' ™
* » w a* P** f* D * (-1 ^ " I'T ^ ^ mr a *** D ^ r*r mm* Gp 3 1 5 1 *r5 T J• • • • • • • * .£ .£ -S -£ -1 -m -i **. m* m* * " **l "*_ 1 » **1 "l **l rf
DIll!l!Z»l!l!liri!2i!l-.!-!-.!!j J-jSIlIill J—U JJJJ3
3
•s
J1
«•»um.
ax«
wa•*
>'inm.
••
i
y
Kite NMa:
Ifeatlnghouso Sfcaron
W|L
SAMPLES
.«. f,
22533
S~pl1n.
Dato<a)i «-2-W
- B-3-W
IWB/r>>
,M . * " "
*""<"•««•> "•'":
CCWL *
Dilution factor / ((100 - *wlsture)/100)
Is
hla
!:
J 2
[3JJK *.1f|a
•f
a
*t
ss
5,
1
1
1
1
- *
l*mf '
3£_.]|M
ii
s's's's's's's'.s'.M 96• i
3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' , , , 3' , . . m . 3' ,
K
5?
3DE PCFINir
revised 07j
oKS
IS
1
rcVf
I*1 *'*'*'*'*' m , JJJJJJJJMHJMJm}.! :
S 2 •a •
ii 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* J J , 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3* 3' s'i 3* 3
*: n *• *• M
3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' 3' J ? 31 3' 3' 3' s' 3' 3' - . 31 3§ 3' 3§ 3' ^ 3' 3
s"t
3,=j^
«M 2
J,• •
-i
§
irf' y 3*'-.1-. ***'*'*'*'*'-}•?*'-> m ***'****£****-{.{
^*j U U O
-M "5* a * i v
?!s if
Sito n
41.
^ 1 L fl "• mtmt It & "mt mf
eiimt
I
|-1
2
N-
*
k|e
I
•
mte
I
5
?i£
K1 K1 K1 K1 I*-' I-.1 I*' N.1 «* «' «' «* «* «' PJ* K1 «' M1 I-,1!-,1
"l "l "l "l 1 "l "l "I 1 "l "l W! "l 1 1 "*• "l *"» ""»
*o 53M
fm K
1!{1{!S
1e« RR«^"
CTOt •
Contract Roqirirad Quant t
tat Ion
ll-il
t
2 i 25 S *
•w * WJ- J • l *1 •• J?j «j iS"j j cjj < O
ftR:<00688
AR.1U0689
Nl i S-iS aS3i-.l 5,mi§.i-3i-i;jii3S
•sujc ••-.:..—.Z1—•* *-wco^ui<er-. <b-.
ABU C-.IO-12V
M52ou-zo•C u
t_9 HIM
lUUIMO)
.m.
o3
I
Hi*•> _,
V3 3* 5fI II
AR30069I
Attachment B
Dioxin/Dibenzo furan Data Validation, Analytical summary,chain-of-Cuato<Jy i
AR3U0692
5 Undemood Court, Oelran. New Jersey 08075-1229609-461-4003 • 215-238-0338 • Fax 609-461-4916
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTIONEPA CONTRACT 68-WO-0036
MEMORANDUM ,
TO: Gerald Heston, OSC, EPA Region IIIWestern Removal Section
FROM: Marian Murphy, TAT Region III r+v\ TDD# 9205-25BPCS/ 5497
SUBJECT: Westinghouse Sharon Samples Analytical Review
DATE: September 15, 1994
This report covers the general review of the data package submittedby Weston Lionville Analytical Laboratory, for one (1) rinsateblank sample and fifteen (15) . soil samples collected at theWestinghouse Sharon Site on August 2-3, 1994. The samples werereceived at Weston Liovnille Analytical Laboratory, in Lionville,PA on August 6, 1994. The analysis requested was isomer specificpolychlorinated dibenzo dioxins and poly chlorinated dibenzo furansand to determine the toxicity equivalents as 2,3,7,8 tetra chlorodibenzo dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD).
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY
' The samples were analyzed for isomer specific polychlorinateddibenzo dioxin and polychlorinated dibenzo furans following EPAMethod 8280.
• Signed chain-of-custody records were received.
• The hold times were met* The initial and continuingcalibration data met ion ratio criteria, percent relativestandard deviation criteria and percent differencecriteria, respectively. The method blanks were free ofcontamination. The surrogate spike recoveries metcriteria. The MS/MSD recoveries and the RPD values metcriteria. All identified isomers met identificationcriteria. Attached is a table of 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicityequivalent factors for all samples which positive valuesfor any isomer or homolog were reported*
CONCLUSION
Accept all data as presented.
Attachment: 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxicity Equivalents Factors
Roy F. Weston, Inc.MAJOR PROGRAMS DIVISION , t _ , . „. „„•,«.„ PIn Association with Foster Wheeler USA Corporation, Resource Applications, Inc., C.C. Johnson & Mainotra, P.R.E. Sarrtera Associates, and GRB Environmental Services, Inc. .An JUUb-fo
3
;'(&
uj £* <n
_ g.09
CO
«s,»« s -'['\n S «15 3 .12 S m«lVI2 n]
nob •+ Jft JH m 5
^i i
i
I
^
1
AR30069U
j II
K
.91 ?iia*<«<!ifly3«vo *oN>
$ V*iocip
5cciir-
1
*H8 * a]X
t i lc£2i ;.s
SIIi
I I
m15§
