FPTRAN: A Volatile Fission Product and Structural Material Transport Code for RELAP/SCDAPSIM EDUARDO...
-
Upload
warren-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
3
Transcript of FPTRAN: A Volatile Fission Product and Structural Material Transport Code for RELAP/SCDAPSIM EDUARDO...
FPTRAN: A Volatile Fission FPTRAN: A Volatile Fission Product and Structural Material Product and Structural Material
Transport Code for Transport Code for RELAP/SCDAPSIMRELAP/SCDAPSIM
EDUARDO HONAISER (Brazilian Navy Technological Center)
SAMIM ANGHAIE (University of Florida)
OUTLINEOUTLINE Introduction Development of the Model
– Numerical Treatment– Phenomena modeling
Implementation into RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.2
Conclusions
Development of a model to predict the transport of released fission products through the RCS, and to calculate the quantities each FP product deposited in the RCS and released to the containment
OBJECTIVEOBJECTIVE
Fission Product BehaviorFission Product Behavior
Fission productsinitial
inventory
Fission Products Release
ChemistryFission Products
Transport
Containment SourceTerm
1E-79
1E-721E-65
1E-58
1E-51
1E-441E-37
1E-30
1E-23
1E-161E-09
0.01
100000
Temperature (K)
Pres
sure
(MPa
)BaO
BaI2
Ba
Fission Product Transport (Scope)Fission Product Transport (Scope)
Vapor phenomena– Adsorption– Condensation
Onto structures Onto aerosol surfaces
– Aerosol nucleation
Aerosol Phenomena– Deposition– Agglomeration– Re-suspension
Characteristics of the ModelCharacteristics of the Model
Fixed speciationPhenomenological and convection model
limited to piping system (upper plenum not considered)
Decay heat of deposited FP not consideredMechanistic model for aerosol nucleation
iiaindjidjsdjres
N
jiajsdjidep
N
j
aaggiaaia
r
agg
iacar
r
iarcariacia
JStxrCAktxrCAk
drtxrNrrktxrCtxrrNtxrCrrrkdr
txrCkdrtxrCkx
txrCAv
t
txrm
,,,,,,1
,,,,1
0
,,
0
,
0
,',,
),,(),,(
'),,'(),'(),,(),,'(),,'()','('2
1
),,('),,'()),,((),,(
Analytical EquationsAnalytical Equations Vapor species
Aerosol Speciesiiindivjsdjiad
N
j
r
eqviardcareqvijsdjsc
N
j
ici
JStxCAk
drCtxCAkCtxCAkx
txCAv
t
txmii
,,,,,1
0
,,,,1
),(
)),(()),(()),((),( max
Transition Analytical-NumericalTransition Analytical-Numerical
0.0E+00
2.0E+09
4.0E+09
6.0E+09
8.0E+09
1.0E+10
1.2E+10
1.4E+10
1.6E+10
1.8E+10
2.0E+10
0.00E+00 5.00E-06 1.00E-05 1.50E-05 2.00E-05 2.50E-05 3.00E-05
Particle Diameter (m)
Tota
l Nu
mb
er o
f Par
ticle
s
Use fractionalstep method toseparate the
convective term
Discrete OrdinateApproach to treat
Aerosol size
Convert PDE into ODE
Apply the Gear Method to solve the ODE system
Hindmarsh (1993)package
Change the integral termsinto summation terns
Define finite limits for particle size spectrum
Numerical EquationsNumerical Equations Bulk states (vapor+aerosol sections)
Surface states (condensed, absorbed, and deposited) Total number of equations of the system: Sx(B+1+3N)
vapijsdjich
N
jieqvapi
B
lllailcjeqvapijsdjsc
N
j
zvapi CAkCCNAkCCAkdt
dmi ,,,,
1,,
1''',,',,,,,
1
,, )()(
ljidjsdjres
N
jlijsdjidep
N
j
B
milmlmagg
l
m
l
lkikmkmagglmk
ieqvapillilcil
ieqvapi
l
lllilc
illl
zli
CAkCAkCNkCNkf
CCNAkt
MCCNAk
t
Mf
dt
dm
,,,,,1
,,,,11
,,,1 1
,,,
,,,,,
,,1'
'',',,'
',,
5.05.0
)]([)]([
Vapor-Structural SurfaceVapor-Structural Surface Laminar flow (Re<2300)
– Leifshitz model (1962)
• Turbulent flow
3/2
0
07.41 hC
C
Heat Transfer (empirical) Mass Transfer
Nu=hdh/k=0.023Re0.83Pr0.33 Sh=Vddh/D=0.023Re0.83Sc0.33
fluidh
n
Vr
DLh
2 fluid
n
hdL V
L
r
C
Cv
0
1
Vapor-Aerosol ProcessesVapor-Aerosol Processes
– Homogeneous nucleation
– Heterogeneous nucleation
Monomers Unstable Clusters Aerosol (stable) and monomers from clusters “break”
Soluble or Insoluble Nuclei
Soluble nuclei (S<1)
Vapor Molecules
Insoluble nuclei (S>1)
Nucleation PatternNucleation Pattern Experimental evidence
– PBF-SFD and Phebus-FP
experiments Procedure
– Calculate selectively
nucleation rate for Ag and U– Select a model for
homogeneous nucleation– Obtain the particle critical size, defining lower particle size as
spectrum limitCritical radius for Ag-U particles : 850 K, S=20: O(10-1m)Experimental evidence: Winfrith
Laboratories (1986): 0.50.9 m
STM
RrrG l ln
3
44 32
0
SRT
Mr
l ln
3*
Homogeneous Nucleation ModelsHomogeneous Nucleation ModelsAnalytical Models
– Classical theory (Becker-Doring (1935)– Kinetic theory (Girshick et al (1990)
kT
S1
Kinetic theory has better performance
2
321,1
)(ln27
4exp
212 S
nSJ
s
Heterogeneous NucleationHeterogeneous NucleationApproach
– Diffusion– Continuum region (Kn<<1)
– Near Continuum region (Fuchs and Stuggin correction)
rp
J- J+
0)(1 2
2
rCdr
dr
dr
d
r
dr
rdCDJ
)(
2,333.171.11
1)(4
vv
veqipbulkiv
KnKn
KnCCNrDm
Aerosol Processes Assumptions Aerosol Processes Assumptions Aerosol spherical shape Empirical evidence
– PBF-SFD and Phebus experiments
Synergy– Mathematical
Sticking coefficientSteady stateStokes Region (Rep<<1)Continuum region (Kn<<1)
inertialgravThermLTdep VVVVV / 0J
pb
c
d
CB
3
Aerosol-SurfaceAerosol-SurfaceGravitationalUsing the concept of mobilityUpper limit of the spectrum: 50 mLaminar diffusion
– Gormley and Kennedy (1954)
ppdg gBmv
r
cr
rrPex
cu
11
......0325.00975.08191.0 1146.44314.7
0
hhh eeeC
C fluidh
n
Vr
DLh
2
fluidn
hdL V
L
r
C
Cv
0
1
Early Models (theoretical)– Friedlander (1957), Davies (1966) and Beal (1968)
Semi-empirical model (Sehmel-1970) Empirical Models
– Liu (1974), Iam and Chung (1983), Chiang (1996)
Aerosol-Surface (Turbulent)Aerosol-Surface (Turbulent)
Model Chi-SquareFriedlander (1957) 0.308Sehmel (1970) 0.111Davies (1966) 0.342Liu and Agarwal (1974) 0.306Iam and Chung (1983) 0.231Chiang (1996) 0.039
*73.0
223.2249.0
Re13.27 Vd
dv
h
p
b
pdT
Chiang Correlation
Aerosol-Surface (Thermophoresis)Aerosol-Surface (Thermophoresis)Principle (Continuum)Brock Solution (1962)
GRADIENT DE
TEMPERATURE
Springer (1970) Talbot (1980) Assessments
– Dumaz (1994)
Experiment Knudsen Deposition(%) Talbot(%) Springer(%)1 0.15 38 21.4 13.22 0.29 45 31.7 21.7
3 0.16 39 24.2 16.5
4 0.67 7.8 8.72 9.55
5 2.67 9.5 9.05 9.42
Error 25% 40%
)(221))(31(
)(2
ptp
gpm
Tbbcpt
p
gs
dTr
rKnCk
krKnC
T
TCrKnC
k
kC
v
Other ModelsOther ModelsBends deposition Pui el al. (1989)
Contractions Muishondt (1996)
Steam separators driers RAFT model
Adsorption Empirical models from Sandia and Winfrith experiments
Re-suspension Parozzi model (2000)
Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)Brownian agglomeration
– Approach (continuum)– Target particle flux from other
particles – Equation
– Boundary conditions Continuum/near continuum region
0),(2
),(2
2
trCrr
trCr
Dab
abba
ba
abba
ba
bababaG
Vrr
DD
rr
rrDDrr
rrK
)(4
)(4),(
Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)Differential gravitational
– Simplified model
– Realistic model Consider the fluid trajectories Approximations
– Fuchs (1964)
– Pruppacher and Klett (1978)
jijijiagg vvrrK )( 22,,
22
,,
),min(
2
1
ji
jijiPK
rr
rr
Turbulent agglomeration– Processes
Diffusivity (small particles) Inertial (large particles)
– Approaches Leifshitz (1962)
– Solution of diffusion equation
Saffman and Turner (1956)– Statistic approach for turbulence
Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)Aerosol-Aerosol (Agglomeration)
๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑
๑ ๑ ๑ ๑ ๑Eddy Scale
Length (100-500m)
5.03)(65.5),(
T
babaT rrrrK
ImplementationImplementation
RELAP5
TRCNL
TRAN
FPTRAN
INPUTD
FPREAD
FPINIT
Implementation in RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD 3.2
VerificationVerification
Robustness of the math solver, positive masses
Global mass error (OK) Sensitive studies
Synergy
111 TDV
11 PCS2 13
Geometry PWR Primary CircuitTime 500 sBoundary ConditionsInlet Gases T 1500 K
Composition 0.5 mass concentrationVelocity 0.5 m/s
Struc. Surfaces Initial Temp 560 KPCS1 SS Hout 2 W/m2K
110 10 Source CsI 0.001 Kg/sCsOH 0.0001 Kg/s
3 TDV Ru 0.001 Kg/s1 TDV Ag 0.01 Kg/s
UO2 0.001 Kg/s
Stability StudiesRe-nodalizationNumber of Sections
StabilityStability
0.00E+00
5.00E+09
1.00E+10
1.50E+10
2.00E+10
2.50E+10
3.00E+10
0.00E+00 5.00E-06 1.00E-05 1.50E-05 2.00E-05 2.50E-05 3.00E-05
Particle Diameter (m)
Nu
mb
er o
f P
arti
cles
N=15
N=5
N=10
N=20
TDV
11--01 11--10 13
10--02
31
0.00E+00
2.00E+10
4.00E+10
6.00E+10
8.00E+10
1.00E+11
1.20E+11
1.40E+11
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Number of Sections
Tota
l Num
ber o
f Par
ticle
s
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1E+06
1E+07
1E+08
1E+09
1E+10
1E+11
Va
po
r
1.1
4
1.5
8
2.2
0
3.0
5
4.2
4
5.8
9
8.1
9
11
.38
15
.81
21
.97
30
.53
42
.42
Co
nd
en
se
d
De
po
site
d
No
rma
lize
d m
as
s
20 nodes
40 nodes
ConclusionsConclusions A FP transport model was developed, using a system of mass
balance equations of first order Aerosol size was treated by a discrete ordinate approach, the
convective term was treated using the fractional step method ODE system was solved using Hindmarsh package Phenomenological models:
– Condensation onto structural surfaces– Condensation onto aerosol surfaces– Aerosol homogeneous nucleation– Aerosol deposition
Gravitational settling, laminar diffusion, turbulent diffusion, thermophoresis
– Aerosol Agglomeration Diffusive, turbulent, and due to gravitational difference
– Additional models Aerosol Re-suspension, deposition onto singularities, vapor adsorption
ConclusionsConclusionsThe model was implemented, and verified regarding:
– Global mass balance
– StabilityFor aerosol size discretizationFor spatial discretization
Prior Activity
1. Develop a model for speciation, with a consistent thermo-chemical database
2. Implementation of upper plenum model
3. Review of release models in RELAP/SCDAPSIM/MOD3.2. Make it consistent with the developed speciation
4. Decay heat model review
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Dr. Chris Allison and Dick Wagner for their support and the use of RELAP/SCDAPSIM for this project