FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

14
FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion OTRC, College Station USA April 2003

description

FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion. OTRC, College Station USA April 2003. Corrosion issues and challenges. Optimal vs. minimal requirements. Corrosion protection Corrosion margins Coating types Maintenance, repair & planning strategies Repair or replace? Now or later? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Page 1: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

FPSO Research ForumForum Discussion

OTRC, College Station USA

April 2003

Page 2: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 2

Corrosion issues and challenges

• Corrosion protection– Corrosion margins

– Coating types

• Maintenance, repair & planning strategies– Repair or replace?

– Now or later?

– Owner/Operator vs. Class vs. Regulatory

– Balancing economic vs. safety vs. environment

• Different environmental & operating conditions

Optimal vs. minimal requirements

Page 3: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Corrosion protection

Page 4: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 4

Corrosion Protection

• Coating:– Critical but expensive:

• Application (fabrication schedule impact)

• Inspection (construction and in-service)

– Class focus during operation but not (normally) NB

– Note: Cannot coat steel with steel

• Anodes– Significant weight and cost. Can we optimize?

• Impressed current

Which provides the best economic return? CAPEX vs. OPEX

Page 5: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Maintenance, repair & planning strategies

Page 6: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 6

Corrosion impact

• Leaking:– Gaseous vapors explosion

– Pollution

• Fatigue:– Lives halved in corrosive environment

(corrosion is located at HS)

– General corrosion has less impact

• Yield strength:– typically small impact

Typically local impact only

Page 7: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 7

Cargo Tank 0.5tk = 0.5mm Ballast Tank 0.5tk = 1.0mm

Material 235MPa 315MPa 235MPa 315MPa

Long. Spacing tmin tmin tmin tmin

900mm 16.6mm 17.8mm 18.0mm 19.3mm

Typical VLCC 20 21

Δ 3.4mm (17%)

2.2mm (11%)

3.0mm

(14%)

1.7mm (8%)

2 – 3mm reduction in main deck plate will reduce

buckling capacity 10-15%

ttkk = 3.0mm (ballast tank) = 3.0mm (ballast tank)

= 14% of actual plate thickness= 14% of actual plate thickness

Corrosion impact - Buckling

Page 8: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 8

DNV’s acceptance criteria options

Thickness measurements

Repair to As-built- Easy to determine- Quick (WSD)

Pass/failNo action

Repair to WWT- Requires simple calc- Medium time (WSD)

Repair to Site- Rigorous calc- Time consuming (LRFD)

Which is the cost effective solution?

Page 9: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 9

Color Coded ModelThickness Measurements

Import Thickness Measurements

Page 10: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 10

“As-built” or “As Measured” Plot

Thickness Distribution Curves (S-Curves)(Tanker Structure

Cooperative Forum & DNV)

Prediction of Steel

Diminution

• Generate repair specifications • Establish volumes, weights, areas & staging• Store all collected information for analysis and later re-use

Compare against requirements

DIMINUTION 'S' CURVE FOR WING TANK 3 PORT M/T "SOKOLICA"

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

-5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Percentage Diminution

Per

cent

age

of R

eadi

ngs

31 2 4

Page 11: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Different environmental & operating conditions

Page 12: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 12

Different environmental & operating conditions

90% of future FPSOs are forecast to be in non-harsh environments but…

Page 13: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 13

Questions for discussion

• Should we focus on:– Corrosion protection systems? (Preventative), or– Monitoring, recording & decision making systems? (Reactive)

• What information do we need:– Corrosion margins– Corrosion rates

• How do we address and rank the variables?– Cargo type, temperature, steel type, etc.

• How do we incorporate into the Life Cycle:– Design– Fabrication inspection– Inspection and Maintenance Planning– Repair decisions– Feedback / Industry updates (ownership)

Page 14: FPSO Research Forum Forum Discussion

Korea Mar 03 DNV Houston backgroundSlide 14

Reference DNV Guidelines

• Classification Notes 72.1 Allowable Thickness Diminution for Hull Structure, November 2000(currently being updated)

• RP Corrosion Protection of Ships, 2000• Classification Notes 33.1, Corrosion Prevention

of Tanks and Holds, July 1999.