Formulation of Incrementally Modified Drugs by Combination · 2015-10-27 · Formulation of...
Transcript of Formulation of Incrementally Modified Drugs by Combination · 2015-10-27 · Formulation of...
Pharmaceutical Research Center
Yong-il Kim
Formulation of Incrementally Modified Drugs by Combination
1
2
Total Sales : USD 761 mil (2014)
Total employees : 1,950 (442R&D, 2015)
Foundation : June 15, 1973
Founder : Sung-Ki, Lim
R&D Investment : USD 153 mil (2014)
Part 1. Hanmi’s FDC Development Work
Part 2. Practical FDC products by platforms
Part 3. Summary & conclusion
- Monolithic tablet : Amosartan®
- Bi-layer tablet : Rovelito®
- PolyCap : Monterizin®, Dutams®
3
CR up to 24hr
Dual release (IR+ER)
Pulsatile
OD/chewable (taste masking)
Liquid
New device
Monolithic / Bi-layered
Multi-layered coating
PolyCap
Inhaler Solubilizing agent
Solid dispersion
Microemulsion
Salt change
Solvate
Complex
(Metabolite) 5
1. Better efficacy : Synergistic mechanism, Improved ADME - Drugs with different treatment mechanism (Amlodipine + Valsartan : Exforge)
- Immediately acting drug + long acting drug (Salmeterol + Fluticasone : Advair)
- Drug + Adverse effect-reducing drug (Naproxen + Esomeprazole : Vimovo)
2. Less adverse event : than a higher dose of single drug - Low dose of 2 drug-combination is more effective than higher dose of single drug
(Statin + Ezetimibe : Vytorin, Atozet)
3. Improved patient compliance : Simplified medication - two or three drugs in one pill (Exforge HCT : 3 drugs in 1 pill)
- harmonized dosing regimen (Vimovo)
6
Many of treatment guidelines recommended combined administration (FDC)
(JNC8-hypertension, GOLD-COPD, ADA Diabetes Care – Diabetes)
4. Economic benefits - Lower manufacturing cost
- Lower medication cost
5. Extended ‘Drug Life Cycle’ - extended duration of exclusive rights by combination (data exclusivity, patent)
; Exforge, Vimovo, Jalyn, Vytorin…
6. Faster commercialization
- Abbreviated clinical study & Low RA huddle than NCE
7
Product Company FDA Approval
Adderall Shire 1996
Suboxone Reckitt-Benckiser 2002
Avalide Sanofi 1997
Diovan HCT Novartis 1998
Exforge Novartis 2007
Lotrel Novartis 1995
Micardis HCT Boehringer-Ingelheim 2000
Vytorin Merck 2004
Janumet Merck 2007
Yasmin Bayer 2001
Atripla Gilead 2006
Combivir GlaxoSmithKline 1997
Epzicom GloxoSmithKlin 2004
Truvada Gilead 2004
Advair GlaxoSmithKline 2000
Combivent Boehringer-Ingelheim 1996
Symbicort AstraZeneca 2006
Complera Gilead 2011 Many global companies have been
working on FDC products and received
approval from the FDA, since 1990’s
Ref> PharmaCircle (2014).
(n=230)
8
Combination rationale
Clinical evidence (synergic effect, reducing adverse effects)
Co-prescription frequency/ratio in the field
Drug-Drug interaction
Absorption mechanism of each drug
Metabolism pathway of each drug
Low possibility of interaction is ideal (Safety / RA perspective)
Dosing regimen
Same dosing regimen is preferred
If not same ; Harmonized / clinically proved dosing regimen is necessary
(need to conduct clinical study)
9
Consideration of physiochemical properties of each drug
Polymorphism
Solubility
Stability (in the stress condition)
Degradation pathway
Compatibility with excipients
Target effective dose
Target release profile
etc
Considering these properties formulation study is performed
10
Challenges of a FDC formulation
Should consider Inter-API interaction Chemical interaction (ex. acid/base reaction)
Physical interaction (effect on the drug release)
Should make an one-dosage form which is bioequivalent to each RLD Formulate to have a comparable release profile of each RLD
If not, additional clinical studies are required (dose finding, safety, efficacy, …)
Should consider a product size FDC tends to be bigger than a single product
Smaller size is preferred
Considering challenges above,
we need to study to find out a suitable FDC dosage form
11
Multi-layer Coated Tablet / Capsule & its expansion
one API is in a core + other API is in a coated layer
Plain tablet (IR or SR) / Coated layer (IR)
Bi-layered Tablet (IR or SR) / Coated layer (IR)
Multi-unit Tablet (IR & SR) / Coated layer (IR)
Hard capsule (Polycap) / Coated layer (IR)
Soft capsule / Coated layer (IR)
Dual-controlled release
IR layer SR core
Conventional monolithic tablet
Bi-layer tablet
By changing the core, various different expansions are possible. 12
PolyCap
• Easy to make a combination drug
• Retain each dosage forms
• Retain each drug release characteristic
• Improved stability (no drug-drug interaction)
Most ideal formulation concept for FDC
Innovative technology for FDC
Capsule, filled with 2~3 different dosage forms
[ pellet x granule x tablet x mini tablet x soft/hard capsule]
13
In hanmi 3 stations for conventional tablet 1 station for 10 mini tablets 1 station for 20 mini tablets 1 station for pellet 1 station for granule(powder)
One of the most ideal combination drugs
for a treatment of high blood pressure
Losartan potassium Angiotensin Receptor Blocker
Amlodipine camsylate
Calcium Channel Blocker
Amlodipine camsy. + Losartan K
3 different dose strengths
5/50, 5/100, 10/50
Norvasc
(amlodipine 5,10mg, besylate)
Cozzar (losartan K 50,100mg)
16
Alternative salt of amlodipine
- patent issue
- poor solubility
Need to improve solubility of amlodipine camsylate salt
Inter-API interaction
Losartan influence on the dissolution & degradation of Amlodipine
Need to overcome inter-API Interaction
amlo. besylate
amlo. camsylate
Losartan Amlodipine
17
XRD of Amlodipine camsylate
◈ For improving solubility of Amlodipine camsylate
: Spray drying to change the crystalline form
Crystalline form Amorphous form
amorphous form
crystalline form
Spray Drying
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Co
nc
.(m
g/m
L)
Time (hr)
Solubility test of Amlodipine camsy. (Basket, 100rpm, Water)
Camsylate(무정형)
Camsylate(결정형)
Increased solubility (2times)
by spray drying
Amorphous
Crystalline
18
Utilized two different types of disintegration agent (cros-carmellose Na / cros-povidone)
Applied separate granulation process to improve dissolution
+
* Gelling tendency of Losartan K (in gastric pH) influence on the disso. of Amlodipine
Losartan Amlodipine Physical interaction
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
0 15 30 45 60
Am
lod
ipin
e (
%)
Time (hr)
pH 1.2 - Amlodipine dissolution
분리과립후
일반과립
Separate granulation
Mixed granulation
Amlodipine
Wet granulation
Losartan
High-dense compacted
granulation
19
◈ Losartan accelerates the degradation of Amlodipine (oxidative reaction)
Screened stabilizer, added anti-oxidant to the formulation
to overcome this chemical interaction.
HN
O
NH2H3C
H3COOC COOCH2CH3
Cl
O
¡Ü
Amlodipine camsylate
H
N
O
NH2H3C
H3COOC COOCH2CH3
Cl
O
¡Ü
Impurity 2
Using Antioxidant
Oxidative Reaction
Losartan Amlodipine Chemical interaction
20
Spray drying
- antioxidant
Wet
granulation
Amlodipine
camsy.
Losartan K
High dense
compacted
granules
Monolithic
tablet
Mixed granules
Formulation concept & manufacturing process related patents (4)
3 granted
1 published
1 KR 1247583 Combination composition (disso)
2 KR 1160151 Combination composition (disso)
3 KR 1232296 Combination composition (stability)
4 KR 2009-0005840A Combination composition 21
Efficacy
Ph 1 DDI Ph 1BE
(FDC vs
co-admin. of RLD)
Ph 2
Dose finding
Ph 3
Efficacy
Safety
2.7 years for whole clinical study
Quite short, compared to NCE products 22
June, 2009 : Launched in Korea (Co-marketing with MSD) Amosartan & Cozzar XQ & Amzzar
Total sales was increased steadily up to 70M USD in Korea (2014)
Expect, export to more than 50 countries
Launched in Russia, Columbia, Panama, Malaysia, Turkmanistan…..
Waiting for an approval from countries in east/mid asia, mid-America, Africa….
MSD
23
Atorvastatin Statin
Irbesartan Angiotensin Receptor Blocker
Irbesartan + Atorvastatin
4 different strengths
150/10, 150/20, 300/10, 300/20
treatment for accompanying disease of
hypertension & hyperlipidemia
• One of the most ideal combination for a
treatment of accompanying disease of
hypertension and hyperlipidemia
Aprovel (Irbesartan 150, 300mg)
Lipitor
(atorvastatin 10, 20, 40, 80mg, Ca)
25
No chemical interaction between APIs
basic stabilizer for atorva. influence to the stability of Irbesartan
Need to prevent the interaction between Irbesartan & basic stabilizer
Irbesartan Atorvastatin API – API interaction
Basic stabilizer API – Excipient interaction
26
0
0.2
0.4
Irbesartan flake only Atorvastatin+ Irbesartan…
monolith tabletwith stabilizer
Imp. B of Irbesartan, 40℃, 75% RH
initial 3mon 6monBasic stabilizer
Acceptable criteria
• by making a bi-layer tablet, stability was improved
and meet the acceptable criteria under 6month accelerated condition
0
0.3
monolith tabletwith stabilizer
Double layer tabletwith stabilizer
Imp. B of Irbesartan (40℃, 75%RH)
initial 6mon
Acceptable
criteria
The formulation concept of Rovelito is Bi-layer,
to separate irbesartan from basic stabilizer
27
Irbesartan
Atorvastatin
+ basic stabilizer
Fluid Bed
Granulation
-rapid dissolution
Atorvastatin
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 15 30 45
Dis
so
luti
on
(%)
time(min)
water 900mL, paddle, 50rpm
시험약(10/150)-임상용
대조약
f2 : 88.2
Rovelito
Lipitor (Pfizer)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30
Dis
so
luti
on
(%)
0.1N HCl 1000mL, paddle, 50rpm
f2 : 62,1
Rovelito
Approvel (Sanofi)
High Shear
Granulation
- High density granule
Irbesartan
* Applied different granulation, considering physiochemical properties
& target release profile of each API
28 Obtained similar dissolution profiles to that of each RLD
* De-lamination can happen in bi-layer tablet
(During Compression, Coating, Packaging, Shipping, Storage)
Caused by
1. Insufficient interlocking in the interfacial area high interfacial surface area & roughness in the adhesion surface
2. Different thermal expansion of each layer similar excipient to each layer is better
3. Air entrapment between layers during compression
Ref. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, 2013; 18(6): 1265–1276
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 398 (2010) 9–13
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 452 (2013) 249– 256
Formulation
consideration
Sufficient amount of binder, Minimum amount of lubricant
Utilize excipient which has large surface area (silicone dioxide)
Similar excipients was applied to each layer
During
Compression
1st Layer : minimum compression force
increase roughness of interfacial layer
2nd Layer : increased dwell time for main compression
prevent air entrapment between layers
29
Preventing delamination issue
Irbesartan 1st Layer Atorvastatin 2nd Layer
Granulation
(HSM) Binding
solution
Drying
/Sizing
Blending
Granulation
(FBG)
Binding
solution
Blending
Bi-layer
compression Coating
Drying
/Sizing
weighing weighing
Basic
stabilizer
Uncoated
weighing weighing
Film coated
150 / 10mg 150 / 20mg
Atorvastatin Ca
Irbesartan
Formulation concept & manufacturing process related patents (3)
1 granted
2 published
1 KR 1248804 Combination composition (bi-layer)
2 KR 2012-0096036A Combination composition (process)
3 KR 2012-0096477A Combination composition (stability) 30
Efficacy
Ph 1 DDI Ph 1BE
(FDC vs
co-admin of RLD)
Ph 3
Efficacy
Safety
Rovelito, a treatment of accompanying diseases
Ph2 clinical study was not required to get an approval 31
Dec. 2013, Launched in Korea (Co-promotion with Sanofi)
Total sales is gradually increased by year
& expect to reach more than 50mil USD .
Sanofi
aventis
0
5
10
2013 2014
0.1
4
Sale
s (m
illio
n d
olla
r)
Rovelito
32
Levocetirizine 2HCl
Histamine H1 receptor antagonist
Montelukast Na
Leucotriene D4 antagonist
Asthma
Rhinitis One of the most ideal combination of drugs for a
treatment of accompanying disease of allergic
rhinitis & asthma
Montelukast Na + Levocetirizine 2HCl
2 strengths
10/5 (adult) , 5/5 (children)
a treatment for allergic rhinitis & asthma
Singulair
(montelukast 10mg, Na)
Xyzal (levocetirizine 2HCl 5mg)
34
Inter-API interaction
Levocetirizine has a negative effect to stability of Montelukast.
Montelukast has a negative effect to stability of Levocetirizine.
have to separate APIs
Montelukast Levocetirizine
35
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
initial acc. 1mo acc. 3mo
Montelukast imp. A
Monte only
Monte + Levocetirizine
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
initial acc. 1mo acc. 3mo
Levocetirizine total imp.
Levocetirizine only
Levocetirizine + Monte
Monolithic tablet
Bi-Layered Tablet
Polycap : 2T x montelukast,
1T x levocetirizine
Montelukast imp. A Levocetirizine total imp.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
monolith doublelayer
PolyCap
initial acc.1 acc.3
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
monolith doublelayer
PolyCap
initial acc.1 acc.3
Polycap showed better stability selected as a dosage form 36
PolyCap(w tablet) provided lower dissolution rate
result in delayed PK profile in dog tried to improve dissolution rate
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 15 30
%R
ele
as
ed
Time (min)
Montelukast – 0.5% SLS, 75rpm, Paddle
Singulair
Capsule
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 15 30
%R
ele
as
ed
Time (min)
Levocetirizine – Water, 75rpm, Paddle
Xyzal
Capsule
0
15000
30000
45000
0 6 12 18 24
Pla
sm
a levels
of
Monte
lukast(
ng/m
l)
Time (hr)
Montelukast (10mg/dog)
Singulair + xyzal combi.
Monterizine capsule
0
1500
3000
4500
0 6 12 18 24
Pla
sm
a levels
of
Levocetirizin
e(n
g/m
l)
Time (hr)
Levocetirizine (5mg/dog)
Xyzal + singulair combi.
Monterizine capsule
37
Characters • Combined characters of Polycap + MUPS
- Prevent interactions
- Make FDC more easily
- Adjust a dose by changing the number
of tablets
- Expect lower PK variability
- Expect narrow gastric empting time
- Expect rapid dissolution
• PolyCap of mini spheroidal tablets
(with diameter of less than 2mm)
MUST concept
38
• Abbreviation for Multi Unit Spheroidal Tablet • Unique and innovative technology for FDC product
Monterizin MUST capsule
20 mini tablets - 10mg Montelukast
/ 10 mini tablets – 5mg Levocetirizine
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 15 30
%R
ele
as
ed
Time (min)
Montelukast – 0.5% SLS, 75rpm, Paddle
Singulair
Monterizine (MUST)
Monterizine
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 15 30
%R
ele
as
ed
Time (min)
Levocetirizine – Water, 75rpm, paddle
Xyzal
Monterizine (MUST)
Monterizine
dissolution rate was improved, and showed similar profiles to each RLD 39
Coating
Encapsulation
FB coating
Compression
(specified punch)
& Fluidbed
coating
Montelukast Na
mini tablet Levocetirizine 2HCl
Mini tablet
Polycap
10T 20T
encapsulation
with Polycap 1 KR 1418404 Combination composition (MUST)
2 KR 2011-0070680A Combination composition (PolyCap)
3 KR 2013-0075099A Combination composition (Stability)
Formulation concept & manufacturing process related patents (3)
1 granted
2 published
41
Clinical trial
I / III
On-going
Clinical phase III
Time (h)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Mon
telu
kast
con
cen
tratio
ns (
ug
/L)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Montelukast alone (N=26)
Montelukast + levocetirizine (N=27)
Time (h)
0 6 12 18 24 30 36
Levocetirizin
e c
oncentr
ations (
ug/L
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Levocetirizie alone (N=26)
Montelukast + levocetirizine (N=27)
DDI, Bioequivalence (BE)
Done
Bioequivalence (BE) was proved
Clinical phase I
42
One of the most ideal combination of
drugs for a treatment of BPH
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Tamsulosin HCl adrenergic receptor blocker relaxation in smooth muscle
therefore less resistance to urinary flow
Dutasteride
5-α reductase inhibitor covert testosterone to dehydrotestosterone
Dutasteride + Tamsulosin HCl
0.5mg / 0.4mg
for a treatment of BPH
Avodart (dutasteride 0.5mg)
Flomax (tamsulosin HCl 0.4mg)
44
Different dosage form / drug release characteristic
- Dutasteride
Immediate release, soft gelatin capsule of oil formulation
- Tamsulosin HCl
Sustained release, coated pellet
Development of a one combination dosage form,
which overcomes this difference and also is bioequivalent
to each RLD
45
PolyCap retain each dosage forms / drug release characteristics
* PolyCap, dutasteride soft capsule & tamsulosin pellet
6 oblong
(same as Avodart)
Pellet
(same as Floma)
dutasteride soft capsule
tamsulosin pellet
# 00 too big to swallow
size optimization
was necessary
size reduction of Dutasteride softgel
& amount reduction of Tamsulosin pellet was performed to make a #1 cap.
* w/o modification
By changing a formulation ‘from Oil to Oil+surfactant’
Reduced the size of dutasteride soft capsule ‘from 6 oblong to 2 oval’.
47 Bioequivalence, small one to big one was proven by human study.
Avodart 0.5mg (Reference)
Duted 0.5mg (P1501,Test)
6 oblong 350 mg
2.0 cm
2 oval 110 mg
0.9 cm
1/3 volume half length
Flomax
0.4mg / 330 mg
Hanmi
0.4mg / 155mg
• Reduced total amount of pellet in half by increasing drug load
• Changed manufacturing process
4. Enteric coating
1. Extruding 2. Spheronizing
3. Sustained release
coating
• Spherical bead (cellulose +
API)
(Like a rotor granulator)
• Coating (Enteric)
Manufacturing of spherical pellet
48
Dutasteride 0.5mg
Soft gelatin cap Tamsulosin 0.4mg
sustained release Pellet
1 2
Polycap
Encapsulation
Mixing
Capsuling
Drying
Extruding
Spheronizing
Drying
(Oven)
1st, 2nd
Coating
(FBG)
Sieving
Mixing & kneading
(HSM)
Formulation concept & manufacturing process related patents (4)
1 KR 0582350 Tamsulosin HCl Formulation (Pellet)
2 KR 2012-0007399A Dutasteride softgel composition (size reduced)
3 KR 2013-0075884A Dutasteride softgel composition (capsule shell)
4 KR 2014-0187571A Dutasteride softgel composition (size reduced)
1 granted
3 published
Dutams (# 1)
49
Clinical trial
I / III
Drug-Drug Interaction (DDI)
Bioequivalence (BE) test
On-going
Clinical phase I
will take place soon
Clinical phase III
50
1. For formulation of FDC,
inter-API interaction, compatibility, target dissolution profiles & dosage form size
must be considered.
2. Hanmi has various platforms for FDC,
such as Monolithic, Bi-layer, Multi-layer coating or Polycap.
3. Especially, the Polycap is an ideal platform for FDC which is possible to retain
original dosage form and drug release characteristic, and prevent an interaction
between APIs.
4. Base on these platform technologies, Amosartan and Rovelito were
successfully commercialized with global companies.
Currently, Hanmi still has 8 more developing FDC products for global markets.
Hanmi believes that FDC is highly value-added product
which has much of benefits to patients and companies. 52