Forensics

42
Forensics

description

Forensics. Chapter 1: Introduction. Forensic Science: A Definition. Application of science to law Applies the knowledge and technology of science for the definition and enforcement of such laws. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Forensics

Page 1: Forensics

Forensics

Page 2: Forensics

Forensic Science: A Definition

• Application of science to law• Applies the knowledge and technology of

science for the definition and enforcement of such laws.

Forensic science is the application of science to those criminal and civil laws that are enforced by police agencies in a criminal justice system.

Page 3: Forensics

History and Development

Mathieu Orfila: Father of Forensic toxicology

Alphonse Bertillon: developed the science of anthropometry

Francis Galton: first study of fingerprints

Calvin Goddard: developed the comparison microscope for bullet comparisons.

1813 1879

1892 1929

Page 4: Forensics

…more History1910

Principles of document examination

1950’s

Microscopy as a tool for the forensic scientist

1893

Developed the application of scientific principles to criminal investigations

1910

Locard’s Exchange Principle

Page 5: Forensics

Locard’s Principle"Wherever he steps, whatever he touches, whatever he leaves, even unconsciously, will serve as a silent witness against him. Not only his fingerprints or his footprints, but his hair, the fibers from his clothes, the glass he breaks, the tool mark he leaves, the paint he scratches, the blood or semen he deposits or collects. All of these and more, bear mute witness against him. This is evidence that does not forget. It is not confused by the excitement of the moment. It is not absent because human witnesses are. It is factual evidence. Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot perjure itself, it cannot be wholly absent. Only human failure to find it, study and understand it, can diminish its value.“

Page 6: Forensics

Organization of the Crime Lab

• Over 320 public crime labs in the U.S…a tripling of the number since 1966.

• Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

• Increase in drug abuse• Advent of DNA profiling• Most State Governments maintain crime

labs plus satellite labs.

Page 7: Forensics

Services of the Crime Lab• Physical Science Unit• Biology Unit• Firearms Unit• Document Examination

Unit• Photography Unit

• Toxicology Unit• Latent Fingerprint Unit• Polygraph Unit• Voiceprint Analysis unit• Evidence Collection Unit

Page 8: Forensics

Physical Science Unit

Page 9: Forensics

Physical Science Unit

• Investigators: • Chemists• Physicists• Geologists

• Items Identified:• drugs, glass, paint, explosives and soil

• Job:• Analytical and chemical analysis

Page 10: Forensics

Biology Unit

Page 11: Forensics

Biology Unit

• Investigators:• Biologists• Biochemists

• Identify and Compare: • botanical materials such as wood and plants.

• Job:• Identification and DNA profiling of dried blood

stains, other body fluids, comparison of hairs and fibers

Page 12: Forensics

Firearms Unit

Page 13: Forensics

Firearms Unit

• Identify and examine:• Firearms• Discharged bullets• Cartridge cases• Shotgun shells

• Responsibility:• Examination of garments to detect firearm

discharge residue• Determine approximate distance from target when

weapon was fired.

Page 14: Forensics

Document Analysis Unit

Page 15: Forensics

Document Analysis Unit

• Identify and Examine:• Handwriting and typewriting to determine

authenticity and/or source

• Job: • Analysis of paper and ink and indented writings

(impressions)

• Recreate:• Obliterations, erasures • Burned or charred documents

Page 16: Forensics

Photography Unit

Page 17: Forensics

Photography Unit

• Examine and Record:• Physical evidence at the scene

• Specialize in:• Digital imaging, IR, UV, and X ray photography to

make invisible information visible to the naked eye

• Beyond the Scene:• Preparation of photographic exhibits for courtroom

presentation.

Page 18: Forensics

Can you find the Relationship?

Page 19: Forensics

Toxicology Unit

• Investigators:• Chemists• Biologists

• Examine:• Body fluids and organs for the presence or absence

of drugs and poisons. • Determines Blood alcohol content

• Job:• Works with the coroner or medical examiner’s office

Page 20: Forensics

Latent Fingerprint Unit

Page 21: Forensics

Latent Fingerprint Unit

• Process and examine:• Fingerprints to determine possible matches with

victims and suspects

Page 22: Forensics

Polygraph Unit

Page 23: Forensics

Polygraph Unit

• Job:• Analyze respiration, perspiration, blood pressure

and pulse rate to determine credibility

• Used in conjunction with interrogation to determine credibility of suspects and witnesses.

Page 24: Forensics

Voiceprint Unit

Page 25: Forensics

Voiceprint Unit

• Interpret:• Telephone threats

• Analyze:• Tape recorded messages

• Compare:• Suspect voice recording to evidence to match

source

Page 26: Forensics

Evidence Collection Unit

Page 27: Forensics

Evidence Collection Unit

• CSI: • Crime Scene Investigation

• Consists of:• trained personnel who are dispatched to the crime scene

to collect and preserve physical evidence.

• They simply collect the evidence, they do not do every single job as seen on fiction television.

Page 28: Forensics

Locard’s Principle Revisited• Attempt the Hypothetical Case with a partner.

• Answers:– Victim was inside the car means fibers from its interior have been

transferred onto the victim’s clothing.– Blood from the victim has been transferred onto the velour interior.– Fiber, blood, hair, and skin cells may also have been transferred between

the criminal and victim.– Tire tracks from the car may have been left in the woods.– This would probably lead to the make of car, since the tires are special.– If the vehicle was located, small driving imperfections in the tread could

link it to the crime.– The type of soil at the crime scene may still be on the car’s tires, too.– Interior of suspect’s car could be tested for the fibers, hair, skin cells and

blood of the victim.

Page 29: Forensics

Types of Law – The Three Cs

• Criminal• Civil• Common

Note: there are others but these will be the primary ones in many of our cases

• Probable Cause: situation in which a reasonable and prudent person, viewing the available informatio,n would conclude that a crime has been committed and that the suspect committed it

Page 30: Forensics

Functions of the Forensic Scientist

• Frye v. United States: 1923 Rejection of Lie Detector (Polygraph) results necessitated guidelines for determining judicial admissibility of scientific examinations.

• The Frye Standard: The court must decide if the questioned procedure, technique or principles are “generally accepted” by a meaningful segment of the scientific community.

Page 31: Forensics

Daubert v. Merrel• Whether the scientific technique or theory

can be tested.• Whether the technique or theory has been

subject to peer review and publication.• The technique’s potential for error.• Existence and maintenance of standards

controlling the technique’s operation.• Whether the scientific theory or method has

attracted widespread acceptance within a relevant scientific community.

Page 32: Forensics

Coppolino Case Study

Page 33: Forensics

August 28, 1965Family physician, Karow, called to Coppolino home

Dr. Karow

Carmela’s remains

Carmela Coppolino

Page 34: Forensics

Circa 1966Mary Gibson (Mary Coppolino – second wife)

Marjorie Farber, widow of William Farber, mistress of Carl Coppolino

Page 35: Forensics
Page 36: Forensics

Dr. Carl Coppolino

Spring Chicken Gibson

Page 37: Forensics

July 30, 1963William Farber died

Mary Gibson (Mary Coppolino – second wife)

Page 38: Forensics

Carl and his lawyer

Carl in custody

Page 39: Forensics

Coppolino v. State• M.E. testified that victim died of an overdose of a drug

called succinylcholine chloride based on his toxicology report.

• Succinylcholine chloride breaks down into succinic acid in the body.

• This drug had never before been detected in a human body.

• Defense argued that this test was new and absence of corroborative experimental data by other scientists.

• The court rejected the defense’s argument on the grounds that although the tests may be new and unique, they are admissible only if they are based on scientifically valid principles and techniques.

Page 40: Forensics

Expert Testimony• Must be competent: education degrees, member of

applicable societies, published papers or books, etc.

• Defense may cross-examine the potential expert witness.

• The individual trial judge is the ultimate decision maker regarding expert witnesses.

Page 41: Forensics

Training in Recognition, Collection, and Preservation of Evidence

• Specially trained evidence collectors: CSI• On 24-hour call to aid criminal

investigators in retrieving evidence• Specially equipped with all the proper

evidence collection equipment• Unfortunately, some police forces still

don’t use them or the police themselves have contaminated the crime scene before the CSI team gets there!

Page 42: Forensics

Forensic Pathology• Investigation of sudden, unnatural, unexplained, or

violent death.• Medical Examiner vs Coroner = M.D. vs political

appointee.• Autopsy: http://www.pathguy.com/autopsy.htm • Causes of death: natural, homicide, suicide, accident,

undetermined.• Rigor mortis: starts within the first 24 hours and

disappears after 36 hours. Helpful in estimating time of death. See “Algor mortis”

• Livor mortis: settling of blood after the heart stops. Skin appears dark blue. Used to determine position of body at time of death.