Foreign aid in bosnia 2003 2013
-
Upload
philip-farrell -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
80 -
download
4
Transcript of Foreign aid in bosnia 2003 2013
Foreign Aid in Bosnia 2003-2013
Has it reduced poverty?
Bosnian War 1992-95
Fall of Communism
Three sides
Over 100,000 deaths
Internal partition of the state
Massive infrastructural damage
Bosnia: Socio-economic Picture
Large mineral resources
Over $5 billion in FDI (2003-2011)
GDP per capita: $8300 (2012)
Economy weaker than in 1991
19.5% classified as „poor‟
Women and rural dwellers vulnerable
Classed with High Human Dev (81st)
Percentage of population below poverty line (UNDP)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Entities
FBiH
RS
Who Aids Bosnia?: Bilateral
EU: largest (€100m annually*)
USA: civil society, market oriented economic growth ($1.5b)
Sweden, Germany, Norway, Japan, Italy, Switzerland
Total: $8 billion
Who Aids Bosnia?: Multilateral
UNDP: environment, water, youth, employment ($25m)
Unicef: immunizations, children with disabilities
World Bank, IMF
International NGOs: GAVI, IDA, YBI, Amnesty International, USIP, Save the Children, CARE, Red Cross
Foreign Assistance Disbursements by Fiscal Year
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Disbursements (US$)
Disbursements
(US$)
Category Disbursement Details,2013
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
US$ Millions
US$ Millions
Eradicate poverty and hunger
Promote business, monitor budgets
Improved education
Primary to Secondary transition
Gender equality
Education system
Improve health
Technical and medical aid to hospitals
Environmental Sustainability
Creation of EPA, better laws, land-use policy
Justice sector reform
Donating to initiatives
Stability in the banking sector
Financial and technical assistance
Fiscal policy reform
Energy sector reform
Playing a lead donor role
Election monitoring
Supporting local government
Lobbying efforts and local civil initiatives
Provides training and technical assistance in;
Youth program development,
Conflict management,
Youth civic engagement,
Helping youths find employment,
Repairing public buildings and playgrounds, and
Promoting youth-led environmental initiatives.
Aid Successes
Strengthening and modernization of public administration systems
Strengthening of State institutions
Centralised defence command and control structures
Roads, power supply, telecommunications, water supplies, health and education infrastructure back to near pre-war levels
“Growth fuelled by substantial donor aid” (IMF)
Areas of little success
Little development of the entrepreneurial sector
Poor structural reforms
High levels of corruption
Child mortality still short of MDGs
60% leakage in water supply
Low monthly wages
Ranks very low of Global Competitiveness indices (WEF)
Infant Mortality Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
(deaths/1,000 live births)
Infant mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births)
Literacy Rate
98.9
99
99.1
99.2
99.3
99.4
99.5
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.9
2000 2008 2010 2012
% OF PEOPLE AGES 15-24
LITERACY RATE - % OF PEOPLE AGES 15-24
Poverty rate (World Bank)
0
5
10
15
20
25
2000 2004 2007
% of Population
% of Population
GDP per capitaWorld Bank (US$ in millions)
0.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
14,000.00
16,000.00
2003 2006 2009 2012
Croatia
Bosnia
Serbia
Conclusion
No way of knowing what rates would be like without the massive international aid donated
Infant Mortality and Poverty rates have (by most accounts) decreased
GDP per capita is rising
I conclude that the injection of aid probably has had a positive effect, certainly has not had a noticeable negative effect
Opinion remains divided