Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control --...

download Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF -- 300 Dpi

of 16

Transcript of Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control --...

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    1/16

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    2/16

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    3/16

    Carnage causedby EnviroManiac lies

    THERE ARE NO VALID ALTERNATIVESTO CONVENTIONAL PEST CONTROLPRODUCTS !

    Government Officials, the Green SpaceIndustry, and the public were assuredby EnviroManiacActivists that socalled safe and effective Green Alterna-tives were already available to replaceconventional pest control products.[ Wrong ! ]

    The Green Alternatives are BOGUS,LESS EFFECTIVE, and STUNNINGLY EX-PENSIVE !

    VIRTUALLY ALL Green Alternative Prod-ucts are BOGUS, and have negativesranging from almost TOTAL INEFFEC-TIVENESS except under very specificcircumstances, to a question about theirTOXICITY. The EnviroManiacs did notknow what they were talking about.

    Carnage on

    Green Space Workers

    Without the use of conventional pestcontrol products, many jurisdictionshave had to resort to the backbreakingand agonizing job ofWEED PULLING BYHAND !

    The CARNAGE of EnviroManiac

    Basterds is converting the professionallabour force of the Green Space Indus-try into a group of mere COTTONPICKERS ! Without effective weed con-trol products, they are required to crawlon lawns on their hands and knees pull-ing weeds manually.

    Moreover, municipalities CANNOT affordthe high cost manual labour required

    for weed pulling.

    Consequently, Government Officials enl-ist the help of UNRELIABLE resident VO-LUNTEERS, most of whom are women,elderly, and unemployed.

    Carnage in

    Municipal Green Spaces

    Consequently, the prohibition of pestcontrol products has RUINED municipalGreen Spaces in both Canada andAmerica ! Because of the prohibitionimposed in many jurisdictions, GreenSpaces are overrun by invasive weeds,and LOOK LIKE GARBAGE DUMPS !

    The MUNICIPAL CARNAGE of imple-menting and enforcing NEEDLESS,SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS prohibitionof pest control products is costing from200,000 dollars to 1,000,000 dollars

    PER YEAR for EACH municipality !

    So far, the MUNICIPAL CARNAGE ofPROHIBITIONENVIROTYRANNY acrossCanada has cost the public well over30,000,000 dollars.

    OVER 30,000,000 DOLLARS !

    Carnage in

    Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

    For municipalities like Surrey, BritishColumbia, the cost of prohibition cityhas been estimated at 1,000,000 dol-lars ANNUALLY to manage weeds with-out the use of chemicals.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    4/16

    Carnage in

    Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A.

    In cities like Lawrence, Kansas, Gov-ernment Officials are now revertingback to conventional pest control sinceresidents are no longer interested tovolunteer their time in a losing battleagainst weeds.

    Although the parks and recreation de-partment of Lawrence, Kansas, showedit spends less than 10,000 dollars peryear for pesticides, EnviroManiacActi-vists had lobbied the city's commission-ers to convert all of the city's 52 parksto pesticidefree maintenance by 2009.However, a cost analysis by the Parksand Recreation staff estimated that thecity would have to spend 213,000 dol-lars for equipment; 116,000 dollars an-nually for staff; and 95,000 dollars an-nually for materials to achieve thatgoal. PesticideFree Parks FAILED !

    Carnage in

    Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.

    In 2004, the City of Portland capitulatedunder pressure from the Environ-mentalTerrorOrganization calledNorthwest Coalition For Alternatives ToPesticides ( N.C.A.P. ). Both Portlandand N.C.A.P. recognized that socalledGreen Alternatives were bogus, and al-most totally ineffective. The only solu-tions were the huge cost in paid labourand volunteer work as backbreaking

    weedpickers, and potentially hazard-ous flamethrowers.

    Ultimately, the City of Portland was onlyable to afford PesticideFree Parksthrough the use of EnviroManiacVo-lunteers. Originally, 244 volunteers putin a combined 1,374 hours removing

    weeds at three parks. The availabilityof EnviroManiacVolunteers was UN-RELIABLE, and SEVERELY DECLINED

    over a three year period. In the firstyear, turnout was low, but peaked 60hours for one work party. By the thirdyear, the most attended was a mere 12hours.

    When using conventional, scientificallysafe, and effective weed control prod-ucts, EnviroManiacs at N.C.A.P. esti-mated that an average fiveacre neigh-bourhood park in Portland cost 371 dol-lars per year to keep the weeds out.

    PesticideFree Parks in the City of Port-land, on the other hand, came with theexorbitant cost of 3,621 dollars in an-nual maintenance costs, and 9,455 dol-lars in startup costs for each newpark. High costs were required to payparks department employees to haulweeds collected by volunteers, and toinspect the parks to make sure weedswere under control. Another issue wasthe extraneous carbon emissions fromcars used by volunteers driving to the

    parks to do the weeding.

    PesticideFree Parks FAILED !

    ENVIROMANIACS DO NOT KNOW

    WHAT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT !

    It is abundantly evident, and not sur-prising, that NOT A SINGLE Environ-mentalManiacActivist has ANY recog-nized expertise, training or background

    in matters concerning pest controlproducts or the management of GreenSpaces !

    The opinions of EnviroManiacActivistsin matters concerning turf managementand pest control are TOTALLY VALUE-LESS and UTTERLY WORTHLESS.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    5/16

    Lawns damaged by the destructive European Chafer larvae

    White Grubs Ruining Metro Lawns

    Crows, Raccoons, Skunks Dig Up Turf To Get Tender Juicy Morsels

    April 15 t h, 2010

    Damian Inwood,

    The Province

    Thousands ofLower Mainland

    lawns areLONG GONE

    , thanks to theEuropean

    Chafer Beetle, an underground bug thats chomping its way across the region.

    [ Lower Mainland is the name of the region surrounding Vancouver, British Columbia. ]

    And millions of the chubby, white, 2.5centimetre Grubs enough to supplyrealityTV showSurvivor for a lifetime are to blame.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    6/16

    According to Ian Wraight, Owner ofSurreybased NutriLawn

    >

    The problem is not the Beetles themselves, but the Grubs that grow from theeggs they lay.

    They eat grass roots, and then form a tasty snack for raccoons, skunks, andcrows, which dig them out of the ground.

    Wraight said the infestation has spread from Vancouver, Burnaby, and NewWestminster, to Coquit lam and Port Coquit lam, and has crossed the FraserRiver into Delta.

    So far, the problem has NO T spread to any farmland production areas, said

    Tracy Hueppelsheuser, an Entomologist forBrit ish Columbia s Plant Health Unitin Abbotsford.

    Ontario farmers have suffered losses because of the beetle, Hueppelsheusersaid.

    According to Hueppelsheuser

    >

    Urban communities must be aggressive in trying to stop the spread of the bee-tle, she said. [ With organicnaturalecological practices ?!?!? ]

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    7/16

    BOGUS organicnaturalecological practices

    recommended for controlling White Grubs

    Introduction

    Turf Managers, Government Officials, as well as the public at large, may beunder the MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that there exists a vast array of biologicalnaturalecological PRACTICES for controlling White Grubs. Overall, these prac-t ices are mostly or totally INEFFECTIVE for controll ing White Grubs. Sadly, the

    promotion of these PRACTICES was influential in legislating prohibitions on con-ventional pest control products.

    Occurrence of White Grub Types in Canada

    White Grubs that damage RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAWNS

    Bluegrass Bil lbug

    European Chafer

    MayJune Beetle

    Japanese Beetle

    White Grubs that damage GOLF COURSE FAIRWAYS AND ROUGH

    Black Turfgrass Ataenius

    European Chafer

    MayJune Beetle

    Japanese Beetle

    White Grubs that damage GOLF COURSE PUTTING GREENS AND TEEING GROUNDS

    Annual Bluegrass Weevil

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    8/16

    Mowing Height

    BOGUS ADVICE INCREASING the mowing height of turf will suppress

    White Grub larvae. [ ?!?!? ] Mowing higher will suppressWhite Grublarvae since the beetleadults prefer laying their eggs in short grass. [ ?!?!? ]

    A twoinch mowing height ( 5 centimetres ) is the absolute minimum to main-tain healthy Kentucky bluegrass turf, but threeinches ( 8 CENTIMETRES ) is

    best.

    COMMENTARY Admittedly, the practice of increasing the mowing heightwill improve turf health, allowing it to be more resilient and better tolerate pestinvasion. But increasing the mowing heightWILL NOT get rid of White Grublarvae, nor will it discourage them from targeting a home lawn or a golf fairway.

    This practice is ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

    Irrigation ( Watering )

    BOGUS ADVICE In general, turf is damaged byWhite Grub larvae by creat-ing the equivalent of a water shortage.

    This is because White Grub larvae inflict damage byCHEWING turfgrass roots.

    The practice ofDEEP AND FREQUENT SOAKING of the rootzone may help reducethe effects of rooteating White Grubs. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY The adjustment of irrigation practices WILL NOT get rid ofWhite Grub larvae.

    This practice is ineffective.

    MORE BOGUS ADVICE Untimely and excessive irrigation may tend toattract the beetleadult form ofWhite Grubs. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY It is a myth that irrigation attracts beetles, but it is truethat totally desolate soil conditions will not favourWhite Grub development.

    Adjusting irrigation practices WILL NOT get rid of W hite Grub larvae.

    This practice is ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    9/16

    Soil Aeration or Soil Cultivation

    BOGUS ADVICE ? The injury from White Grubs larvae can be marginally

    reduced by relieving soil compaction ( soil hardening due to traffic ) with thepractice ofMECHANICAL AERATION.

    MECHANICAL AERATION will physically improve the soil conditions by the removalof tiny cylindrical plugs.

    Many types of equipment have been designed for aeration, including those withhollow cylindrical tines. Others have solid naillike tines or spikes that punchholes into the soil.

    COMMENTARY The practice ofMECHANICAL AERATION will improve turf root-

    ing, allowing the entire plant to be more resilient and better tolerate rootchewing White Grub larvae. Regular applications of conventional insecticidesmay still be necessary.

    However, the practice of soil aeration WILL NOT get rid of White Grub larvae.

    Fertilizer Timing

    BOGUS ADVICE Fertilize in the fall, and not the spring or summer.

    [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY Totally ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

    Fertilization Program

    BOGUS ADVICE Too manyWhite Grub larvae is an indication that turf isunhealthy. [ ?!?!? ] In most cases, it supposedly indicates that too much fer-tilizer is being used. [ ?!?!? ] Consequently, grass roots become weak and soft,

    making them more attractive to White Grub larvae, especially under hot anddry summer conditions. [ ?!?!? ] Healthy soil, with nutrients released slowlyby decomposition, is supposed to allow grass roots to grow steadily all year.Rapidlyavailable fertilizers, particularly the liquid ones, reportedly force thegrass to grow far faster than it would naturally.

    COMMENTARY Totally false. Totally untrue. Nothing but urban myths.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    10/16

    HandCatching

    BOGUS ADVICE Trap and remove beetleadults by hand. [ ?!?!? ]

    ForEuropean Chafer and Japanese Beetle, the beetleadults will be feeding orreproducing in nearby ornamental plants before swooping down and droppingeggs into the turf.

    COMMENTARY The practice of HANDCATCHING is labourintensive, andmay be overwhelmingly difficult when high insect infestations occur.

    Moreover, beetleadults may be located in large mature shade trees.

    How many people are fit enough to climb up twenty feet, or higher, into a treecanopy in order to spend hours swatting hundreds of beetleadults ?!?!?

    Organic fertilizer

    BOGUS ADVICE Applying organic fertilizer will suppressWhite Grublarvae. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY Totally ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

    Physical Removal

    BOGUS ADVICE Flick the beetleadults off the leaves and into a jar ofsoapy water. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY The practice ofPHYSICALLY REMOVING beetleadults has lim-ited effectiveness, and will be an overwhelming task when high insect infesta-tions occur.

    Again ... beetleadults may be located in large mature shade trees.

    Again ... how many people are fit enough to climb up twenty feet, or higher,into a tree canopy in order to spend hours swatting hundreds of beetles ?!?!?

    Physical Removal is totally impractical for controll ing White Grub larvae.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    11/16

    Predatory Birds

    BOGUS ADVICE Some types of birds will eat the adult or larvae of WhiteGrub species.

    Beetleeating birds, such as Cardinals, Crows, Grackles, Meadowlarks, Robins,and Starl ings, can be attracted with certain flowers, shrubs, and trees.

    The installation of a nesting box forStarl ings will suppressWhite Grub lar-vae. [ ?!?! ] Birdfeeders, birdhouses, and birdbaths are also recommended.

    COMMENTARY Totally ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

    Does anybody actually try any of this nonsense before putting these imaginarymethods of control in writing ?!?!?

    By the way, some experts claim thatStarl ings will feed on the Leatherjacketlarvae ( another turf pest ), but notWhite Grubs. [ ?!?!? ]

    Predatory Insects

    BOGUS ADVICE Attracting NATURAL INSECT PREDATORS like WASPS with cer-tain plants will suppressWhite Grub larvae. [ ?!?!? ]

    Some species ofWASPS, such as Scoliidsand Tiphiaspp. will specificallyPREY on White Grubs. They will seek out grubs, into which they will lay their eggs.

    These WASPS are attracted by plants like Cherry, Elm, Maple, and Peonies.

    COMMENTARY The use of Predatory Insects is NOT a practical deterrent.

    The practice of attracting NATURAL INSECT PREDATORS is not as straightforwardas people claim.

    For example, in the case of the Japanese Beetle, there are a number of flies,pathogens, and wasps, that feed on its larvae. If the predator populations arehigh, then Japanese Beetle larvae may be suppressed . However, suchNATURAL INSECT PREDATORS will take five to ten years to catch up with the initial

    wave of the Japanese Beetle larvae. Once these predators become better es-tablished, populations ofJapanese Beetlemay be suppressed, butnevercontrolled or eliminated.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    12/16

    Predatory Insects ( continued )

    MORE BOGUS ADVICE If turf has been sprayed with insecticide within the

    past few years, then most of the NATURAL INSECT PREDATORS thatPREY on WhiteGrub larvae have been annihilated. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY Totally false. Totally untrue. Nothing but an urban myth.

    It should be pointed out that damaging insect populations, like White Grub lar- vae, return year after year, despite regular and repeated insecticide applica-tions. Why ? Conventional insecticides have lowimpact and are of shortduration in the environment.

    However, NATURAL INSECT PREDATORS, like Ground Beetles, that prey on Leath-

    erjacket larvae ( another turf pest ), may be affected by insecticide applications.

    Repellent Plants

    BOGUS ADVICE The practice of selecting and planting certain ornamentalplant species will repelWhite Grub beetleadults, presumably by the releaseof a strong plant odour. [ ?!?!? ]

    Here are examples ofrepellent plants [ ?!?!? ]

    Begonia. Buttercup. Carnation. Cornflower. Daisy. Fir. Flower-ing Dogwood. ForgetMeNot. Forsythia. Hemlock. Hydrangea.Juniper. Li lac. Lily. Magnolia. Mint. Mulberry. Ornamental Kale.Pansy. Pine. Poppy. Red Maple. Silver Maple. Sweet Pea. Tan-sies. Taxus. Tulip Tree. Violet. W ormwood.

    COMMENTARY Overall, the practice of planting repellent plants is ineffec-t ive, and unreliable, for controll ing White Grub beetleadults.

    Does anybody actually try any of this nonsense before putting these imaginary

    methods of control in writing ?!?!?

    However, the reverse concept may be valid.

    Japanese Beetle adults are ATTRACTED byRose plants.

    MayJune beetleadults are ATTRACTED to Oak trees.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    13/16

    Seeding

    BOGUS ADVICE ? The practice ofOVERSEEDING INTO ESTABLISHED TURF with ryegrasses and fescues will suppressWhite Grub larvae.

    COMMENTARY The establishment of certain turf species may providesuppression ofWhite Grubs, butnevercontrol or elimination.

    Unfortunately, OVERSEEDING into established turfWILL NOT improve conditionsunless it is performed for aLONG PERIOD OF TIME.

    Soap Solution

    BOGUS ADVICE The practice of applying a mixture of common HOUSEHOLDSOAP and water will controlWhite Grub larvae. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY This is a ripoff kitchen concoction of manufactured andlegallyregistered INSECTICIDAL SOAP which contains FATTY ACIDS.

    Soap solution is totally ineffective for controll ing White Grub larvae.

    There is a legal fine point here.

    If someone recommends that household soapcontrolsWhite Grub larvae,then, legally and technically, the recommendation makes household soap apest control product.

    Such a recommendation, in either verbal or written form, becomes aVIOLATIONof federal law.

    As such, common household soap is an unregistered product.

    Spiking

    BOGUS ADVICE White Grubs can be controlled by the practice of pass-ing a roller with spikes on turf, or by performing mechanical aeration. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY Lamebrained and sil ly. Need we say more.

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    14/16

    Topdressing

    BOGUS ADVICE The practice ofTOPDRESSING a thin layer of soil over the

    entire turf surface will help prevent the invasion of damaging insects. [ ?!?!? ]

    COMMENTARY This practice is advantageous only for those who supplytopdress materials and services.

    Overall, the practice of topdressing is ineffective, and unreliable, for controll ingWhite Grubs.

    Biological Pest Control EntomoPathogenic Nematode Products

    EntomoPathogenic Nematode products CANNOT be consistently considered asa true alternative to conventional insecticides, since insect pests, like WhiteGrub larvae, are often only SUPPRESSED and NOT CONTROLLED byNematodes.Furthermore, not every species of EntomoPathogenic Nematodes will beequally effective against a particular insect pest.

    Laboratory and field tests tend to indicate that the BEST species ofNematodesprovide onlyMODERATE CONTROL, orSUPPRESSION , where up to f i f ty to sixtyf ive per cent of the damaging insect population is killed.

    Other Nematode species have been show to provide INEFFECTIVE CONTROL,with SUPPRESSION levels as low as twentyfive to forty per cent .

    Research reports and practical field experience have indicated the expectedproductEFFICACY for the control ofWhite Grub larvae

    imidacloprid ( Merit ) preventive only eightyfive toninetyfive per cent eff icacy

    carbaryl ( Sevin ) preventive or curative up to seventyf ive per cent eff icacy

    diazinon ( Basudin ) preventive or curative f i f ty to sixtyf ive per cent eff icacy

    chlorpyrifos ( Dursban ) preventive or curative forty percent eff icacy

    EntomoPathogenic Nematodes preventive only twentyf ive to sixtyfive per cent eff icacy

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    15/16

  • 8/9/2019 Force of Nature -- Carnage -- Vancouver -- 2010 04 15 -- BOGUS Advice for White Grub Control -- MODIFIED -- PDF

    16/16

    Force Of Nature presents THE WHOLE TRUTH FROM AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE from National Organi-zation Responding Against Huje that seek to harm the Green Space Industry (NORAHG). It is a series of

    Reports destined for the Green Space Industry, the Environmental Terror Movement, Governments, and theMedia, nationwide across Canada, the United States, and overseas. The information presented in Force OfNature has been developed for the education and entertainment of the reader by providing a sequence of

    historical events WITH COMMENTARY. The neutrality of these Reports might be disputed.

    Huje is a term used to describe Enviro Maniac Activists that routinely concoct FEAR MONGERING, FRAUDU-

    LENT LIES, MISCONCEPTIONS, COERCION, THREATS, DECEPTIONS, TERROR, and PARANOID CONSPIRA-CIES that are DESIGNED to SCAM and DECEIVE the public into believing that families are in some NONEXISTENT danger with conventional pest control products. Huje also SCAM and DECEIVE Government Offi-

    cials into the NEEDLESS, SENSELESS, and MALICIOUS prohibition of FEDERALLY LEGAL, SCIENTIFICALLYSAFE, TOTALLY IRREPLACEABLE, and ABSOLUTELY INDISPENSABLE conventional pest control products.

    All information, excerpts, and pictures contained in this Report were found somewhere on the Internet, andmay be considered in the public domain, serving one of the following purposes archive, education, pro-

    motion, publicity, or press release. The events, characters, companies, and organizations, depicted in thisReport are not always fictitious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, may not be coincidental.

    Force Of Nature is TOTALLY INDEPENDENT of any trade association or business operating within the GreenSpace Industry. Dont thank us. Its a public service. And we are glad to do it.

    Force Of Nature, and its various incarnations, is the brainchild of William H. Gathercole and his entourage.Mr. Gathercole is a principal FOUNDER of the Modern Professional Lawn Care Industry in BOTH Ontario and

    Quebec. He holds a degree in Horticulture from the UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH, and another pure and appliedscience degree from McGILL UNIVERSITY. He has worked in virtually all aspects of the Green Space Indus-

    try, including GOLF, PROFESSIONAL LAWN CARE, and CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, and has served in public af-

    fairs, workplace safety, and environmental compliance. Mr. Gathercole has supervised, consulted, pro-grammed, and/or overseen the successful and safe execution of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of pest controlapplications in the urban landscape. He has trained, instructed, and consulted with THOUSANDS of turf

    managers and technicians. Mr. Gathercole has also been an agricultural agronomist. For many years, Mr.Gathercole was a contributing columnist for TURF & Recreation Magazine, Canadas Turf and Grounds Main-tenance Authority. Mr. Gathercole is now retired from Force Of Nature, although his name continues to ap-

    pear as the FOUNDER. Mr. Gathercole is personally credited for crafting the Golf Industry Exception Status,that endures to this day. He is also the creator of the signs that are now used for posting after application.

    His vast knowledge of our long journey with Environmental Issues is UNDENIABLE hopefully ! For FIF-TEEN YEARS, the strategies designed and implemented by Mr. Gathercole and his colleagues guaranteed the

    control of Environmental Terror for the entire Modern Green Space Industry across Canada. Mr. Gather-coles involvement in Environmental Issues reached a fevered pitch in the 1990s, when he orchestrated,

    with his colleagues, legal action against the Forces of Environmental Evil in the Town of Hudson, Quebec.Mr. Gathercole is the ONLY TRUE RELIABLE WITNESS of the Hudson Affair.

    Mr. Gathercole and his entourage have followed the evolution of ENVIRONMENTAL TERRORISM for over aquarter century. Through Force Of Nature, Enviro Maniac Activist Huje are identified on the basis of their

    statements, activities, affiliations, and whereabouts. Even though each Enviro Maniac Culprit is a misguided

    adversary, each still deserves our respect. The use of the terms Maniac, Culprit, Terrorist, or Basterd arenot accusations of any legal wrong doing. Force Of Nature is simply holding Enviro Maniac Activists account-able for conspiring to change public policies that TERRORIZE, HARM, and THREATEN the Green Space Indus-

    try. Their pretentious prohibitionist rants have created LOSS OF REVENUES, BUSINESS FAILURES, BANK-RUPTCY, and UNEMPLOYMENT, inflicting DESPAIR and DESTITUTION for THOUSANDS of hapless victims

    throughout the Green Space Industry. The DEPRAVED INDIFFERENCE of Maniac Culprit Terrorist BasterdHuje is viewed as a form of TERROR, HARM, and THREAT against the Green Space Industry.

    The following Force Of Nature Reports are currently available A Look At Alberta Conspiracy Brit-ish Columbia Conspiracy Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment Canadian Cancer So-

    ciety Canadian Environmental Law Association Carnage Consequences Culprit David SuzukiFoundation Dating Services for Enviro Maniacs DDT and Politicized Science Death and the Envi-

    ronmental Terror Movement Enviro Profit Environmental Terrorists Unmasked Famous Quotations Fertilizer Terror Hero June Irwin, the Clown of Junk Science Kazimiera Jean Cottam Land-

    scape Trades Capitulate Lying Sac of EnviroManiac Cwap MythBusting Needless Hysteria NewBrunswick Conspiracy Newfoundland Conspiracy Nova Scotia Conspiracy Ontario Conspiracy Organic Fertilizers Paranoid Theories Pesticide Free BC Pets and Lawn Care Chemicals Positive

    Waves Prince Edward Island Conspiracy Quebec Conspiracy Rachel Carson, the Queen of Junk Sci-

    ence Reining a Terrorist Reaction Salmon Arm BC Conspiracy Satire Terror NEVER Ends Ter-ror Talk The 9/11 Era of the Green Space Industry The Bin Laden of Enviro Terror, Paul Tukey TheFailure of Integrated Pest Management The Looming Golf Industry Shipwreck The Industry Strikes

    Back The Misconceptions About Cancer The National Annihilation of the Modern Green Space Industry The Wisdom of Bill Bell The Wisdom of Drysdale The Wisdom of Health Canada The Wisdom of

    Holland The Wisdom of Lowes The Wisdom of Mains The Wisdom of the Solomons The Wisdomof Whelan Update Warning