For the issuance ofAir Permit # 1009-AOP-R9 AFIN: 70 …€¦ · · 2011-11-23the metal that has...

STATEMENT OF BASIS

For the issuance of Air Permit # 1009-AOP-R9 AFIN: 70-00098

1. PERMITTING AUTHORITY:

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality5301 Northshore DriveNorth Little Rock, Arkansas 72118-5317

2. APPLICANT:

Clean Harbors EI Dorado, LLC309 American CircleEI Dorado, Arkansas 71730

3. PERMIT WRITER:

Ann Sudmeyer

4. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND NAICS CODE:

NAICS Description: Hazardous Waste Treatment and DisposalNAICS Code: 562211

5. SUBMITTALS:

8/23/2011

6. REVIEWER'S NOTES:

Clean Harbors operates a hazardous waste treatment and storage facility located in EIDorado. The primary treatment process consists of incineration, and some recyclingactivities.

This permitting action is necessary to permit a metal recovery system at SN-07 to recyclethe metal that has been processed through the kilns. The emissions will exhaust throughthe existing baghouse at SN-07. The total permitted annual emission rate limits will notchange with this minor modification.

Permanent Notes:

This facility has installed 8 new lances which feed waste to the Secondary CombustionChamber. They state that this change will not alter the mass feed rate or the facility

Permit #: 1009-AOP-R9AFIN: 70-00098 of24

emISSIOns. Any future modifications to hourly capacity should be evaluated to ensurethat they are not related to this physical change.

The EPA requested that the facility maintain a COMS for demonstrating compliance withthe opacity requirements at SN-01.

Modeling for the TLV table for the groundwater emissions (SN-01, SN-03, and SN-23)was conducted at the lower stack height.

7. COMPLIANCE STATUS:

The following summarizes the current compliance of the facility including active/pendingenforcement actions and recent compliance activities and issues.

On August 3, 2011, an inspection was conducted and showed the facility to be out ofcompliance for utilizing more than 74% of the recovered energy from the liquid wastefired boiler (Specific Condition #13).

On August 9, 2011 the facility met with the Department regarding potential exceedancesof the NOx and S02limits at SN-01. A CAO and permit modification are pending toresolve this issue.

8. PSD APPLICABILITY:

a. Did the facility undergo PSD review in this permit (i.e., BACT, Modeling, etc.)? N

b. Is the facility categorized as a major source for PSD? Y(once NOx limits are corrected)Single pollutant ~ 100 tpy and on the list of28 or single pollutant ~ 250 tpy and not on list?

If yes, explain why this permit modification is not PSD?8.0 tpy PM/PMIO is the potential of the source; thus, less than PSD thresholds.

9. SOURCE AND POLLUTANT SPECIFIC REGULATORY APPLICABILITY:

Source PollutantRegulation

(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)

SN-34 S02, opacity 40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc

SN-21 VOC 40 CFR 60, Subpart Kb

Equipment Leaks VOC 40 CFR 60, Subpart VVa

Facility VOC 40 CFR 61, Subpart C

Facility VOC 40 CFR 61, Subpart E

Equipment Leaks HAP 40 CFR 61, Subpart V


Source PollutantRegulation

(NSPS, NESHAP or PSD)

Facility VOC 40 CFR 61, Subpart FF

SN-31,37,38,3~4~41 HAP 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD

Tanks HAP 40 CFR 63, Subpart 00

Containers HAP 40 CFR 63, Subpart PP

Facility ALL 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE

10. EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULATION:

See emission change and fee calculation spreadsheet in Appendix A.

11. MODELING:

Criteria Pollutants

Examination of the source type, location, plot plan, land use, emission parameters, andother available information indicate that modeling is not warranted at this time for S02and VOC.

a. Includes background concentration of23.0 micrograms per CUbIC meter (LIttleRock, 2008)

Emission RateNAAQS Highest

%ofPollutant

(lblhr)Standard Averaging Time Concentration

NAAQS(J.1g/m3

) (J.1g/m3)

PMlO 19.88 150 24-Hour 125.8b 83.9%

80 Annual N/A N/A

S02 N/A 1300 3-Hour N/A N/A

365 24-Hour N/A N/A

10,000 8-Hour 29.7 0.3%CO 39.3

40,000 l-Hour 49.8 0.2%

NOx 46.0 100 Annual 1.5 1.5%

Rolling 3-monthPeriod over 3

Pb 0.0616 0.15 years (not to be 0 0%exceeded in any3 month period)


b. Includes background concentration of 43.0 micrograms per cubic meter (LittleRock, 2008)

c. 1st High

Non-Criteria Pollutants:

This permit contains a TLV table for organic HAPs and hydrazine. Modeling was usedto determine the permitted emission rates for ranges of these pollutants (grouped byTLV) that pass the PAER or PAIL.

1st Tier Screening (PAER)

Estimated hourly emissions from the following sources were compared to thePresumptively Acceptable Emission Rate (PAER) for each compound. The Departmenthas deemed the PAER to be the product, in lb/hr, of 0.11 and the Threshold Limit Value(mg/rrr'), as listed by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists(ACGIH).

PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =

Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/nr') 0.11 x TLV

Antimony Compounds 0.5 0.055 0.11 N

Arsenic Compounds 0.01 0.0011 0.0306 N

Beryllium Compounds 0.002 0.00022 0.0207 N

Cadmium Compounds 0.002 0.00022 0.0526 N

Calcium cyanamide 0.5 0.055 1.066 N

Chlorine 1.45 0.1595 10.625 N

Chromium Compounds 0.01 0.0011 0.0306 N

Cobalt Compounds 0.02 0.0022 0.51 N

Cyanide Compounds 0.75 0.0825 1.066 N

Dioxins/Furans a 0.001 0.00011 8.99E-8 y

Hydrochloric acid 2.98 0.3278 10.938 N

Hydrogen fluoride 0.409 0.04499 6.24 N

Manganese Compounds 0.2 0.022 10.01 N

Mercury Compounds 0.01 0.0011 0.039013 N

Methyl chloroform 1909.89 210.08 27.676 Y

Methylene chloride 173.68 19.104 52.386 N


PollutantTLV PAER (lb/hr) =

Proposed lb/hr Pass?(mg/nr') 0.11 x TLV

Nickel Compounds 0.1 0.011 2.01 N

Phosphine 0.417 0.0458 1.086 N

Phosphorus 0.1 0.011 1.066 N

Selenium Compounds 0.2 0.022 5.01 N

Tetrachloroethylene 169.52 18.64 10.386 Y

Titanium tetrachloride" 0.54 0.0594 1.086 N

H2S 13.93 1.53 0.1 Y

a. Hypothetical value. The reviewing engmeer screened these pollutants based on ahypothetical TLV of 0.001 mg/rrr'. The emission rates for dioxins and furans were basedon the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE.

b. No TLV found. Used AEGL-1 (8-h)

2nd Tier Screening (PAIL)

AERMOD air dispersion modeling was performed on the estimated hourly emissionsfrom the following sources, in order to predict ambient concentrations beyond theproperty boundary. The Presumptively Acceptable Impact Level (PAIL) for eachcompound has been deemed by the Department to be one one-hundredth of the ThresholdLimit Value as listed by the ACGIH.

PollutantPAIL (ug/nr') = 1/100 of Modeled Concentration

Pass?Threshold Limit Value (ug/nr')

Antimony Compounds 5.0 0.0171 Y

Arsenic Compounds 0.1 0.02022 y

Beryllium Compounds 0.02 0.00341 Y

Cadmium Compounds 0.02 0.00441 Y

Calcium cyanamide 5.0 0.18558 y

Chlorine 14.5 3.54 Y

Chromium Compounds 0.1 0.02022 y

Cobalt Compounds 0.2 0.04254 y

Cyanide Compounds 7.5 0.18558 y

Hydrochloric acid 29.8 3.65 y

N


PollutantPAIL (ug/rrr') = 1/100 of Modeled Concentration

Pass?Threshold Limit Value (ug/nr')

Hydrogen fluoride 4.09 0.973 y

Manganese Compounds 2.0a 0.7789 y

Mercury Compounds 0.1 0.0204 y

Methylene chloride 1,736.8 1,500.6 Y

Nickel Compounds 1.0 0.15861 Y

Phosphine 4.17 0.795 Y

Phosphorus 1.0 0.147 y

Selenium Compounds 2.0 0.39122 y

Titanium tetrachloride 5.4 0.795 Y

a. TLV for manganese and morgamc compounds as manganese. Manganesecyclopentadienyl tricarbonyl has a lower TLV, however, since this compound isorganic it would be emitted at a lower rate and pass the strategy.

Other Modeling:

Odor:

HzS Modeling:

A.c.A. §8-3-103 requires hydrogen sulfide emissions to meet specific ambientstandards. Many sources are exempt from this regulation, refer to the Arkansas Code fordetails.

Is the facility exempt from the HzS StandardsIf exempt, explain. _

Pollutant Threshold value Modeled ConcentrationPass?

(Ppb)20 parts per million

0.00272 ppm Y(5-minute average*)80 parts per billion

HzS(8-hour average) 0.00000065 ppb yresidential area

100 parts per billion(8-hour average) 0.00000065 ppb y

nonresidential area


*To determine the 5-minute average use the following equation

Cp = Cm (tm/tp)O.2 where

Cp = 5-minute average concentrationCm = l-hour average concentrationtm = 60 minutestp = 5 minutes

12. CALCULATIONS:

Emission FactorEmission Factor Control

ControlSN Source

(lb/ton, lblhr, etc.) EquipmentEquipment Comments

(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency01 PMIPM lO : 0.013 gr/dscf at 7% Baghouse Unknown

NESHAP limit oxygen01 S02: 1% Sulfur Content Scrubber 90% 225 lb S/hr

Material Balance of sludge 52,0441bsludge/day

01 VOC: 55,837 Incineration 99.998% 125 galTesting and Material micrograms/L - Secondary groundwater/hr

Balance (groundwater) Combustor 1,095,000 gal1.1 lblhr groundwater/yr

(combustion)01 CO: 100 ppm N/A N/A

NESHAP limit01 NOx: 33.2 lblhr N/A N/A

Stack testing(August 8, 1995)

01 Organic HAPs: Assumed 100% of Incineration 99.998% 53,3201bMaterial Balance waste is organic - Secondary feedlhr

HAP Combustor01 HCI and Cl-: 32 ppmv Scrubber 95%

NESHAP limit01 Mercury: 130 ug/dscm Activated Unknown

NESHAP limit Carbon01 Lead and Cadmium 230 ug/dscm Baghouse Unknown

(SVM):NESHAP limit

01 Arsenic, Beryllium, 92 ug/dscm Baghouse UnknownChromium (LVM):

NESHAP limit01 Dioxins/Furans: 0.40 ng TEQ/dscm Activated Unknown

NESHAP limit Carbon



ControlSN Source

(lb/ton, lb/hr, etc.) EquipmentEquipment Comments

(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency03 Material Balance and 55,837 N/A N/A 197,300

Groundwater micrograms/L gaVdayAnalysis

07 Grain loading 25 gr/scf Baghouse 99.9% 8,500 ft3/min

08 AP-42 Boiler factors N/A N/A

Natural gas

09 AP-42 Table 11.12-2 O.72lb PM/ton Baghouse 95% 20 tons/truck

0.46 lb PMIO/ton 1 truck/hr

624 trucks/yr

11 Tanks 4.0 N/A N/A N/A 55,496 gal/yr


16 Estimate 0.1 lb/hr Scrubber Unknown

17 AP-42 Table 11.12-2 0.72 lb PM/ton Baghouse 95% 20 tons/truck

0.46 lb PMIO/ton 1 truck/hr

5 trucks/yr

18 AP-42 Table 11.12-2 0.72 lb PM/ton Baghouse 95%

0.46 lb PMIO/ton


20 Grain loading 15 gr/fr' Baghouse 99.9% 1,200 ft3/min

21 Tanks 4.0 N/A 2 Carbon 99% 6,000 gal/hrCanisters 10,000,000(in series) gal/yr

22 Engineering Estimate 1.01b/hr N/A N/A

23 Material Balance and 55,837 N/A N/AGroundwater micrograms/L

Analysis

25 Drum Sampling and 6.2 lb VOC/lOOO N/A N/A 585,000Drum Filling: gallons samples/yr

Air Emission Models 1,200,000for Waste and gal/yrWastewater

25 Waste Repackaging 0.0037Ib/drum N/A N/A 28,000drums/yr



ControlSN Source


(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency25 Pumps, Flanges, Varied. See permit N/A N/A

Valves: application for

EPA's Protocol for emission factors

Equipment LeakEmission Estimates

dated November 1995

25 Tanker and Railcar 5.1808Ib/car N/A N/A 100 rail cars/yrCleaning: 0.686 lb/truck 750 tank

AP-42 Tables 4.8-1 trucks/yrand 4.8-2

25 Tanker 7.46Ib/l000 Single 90% 100 tankers/yrLoadinglUnloading: gallons Carbon

Air Emission Models Canister

for Waste andWastewater

25 Drum Pumping: 18.04 Ib/l000 llO-gallon 95% 25 drums/hr

Air Emission Models gallons carbon tank 1,200for Waste and tankers/yrWastewater

25 Vacuum Truck 0.18 Ib/l000 N/A N/A 3,000 gal/hrLoading: gallons 500,000 gal/yr

Air Emission Modelsfor Waste andWastewater

25 Equipment and Truck N/A N/A N/A 260,000 galWash washwater/yr

Decontamination:

Tanks 4.0

25 Barrel Crushing: 1.0lb/hr N/A N/A

Estimate

25 Unpaved Roads: 2.6548 lb PMNMT N/A N/A 5 VMT/hr

AP-42 13.2.2 0.6821831b 3000 VMT/yrPMlO/VMT



ControlSN Source


(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency25 Paved Roads: 0.135721b N/A N/A 2,100 VMT/yr

AP-42 13.2.1 PMlVMT 18-wheel

0.0261041b traffic

PMIONMT113,360

VMT/yr CleanHarborsvehicles

25 Railcar Loading 18.04 lb/l 000 Two carbon 99% 4,800 gal/hrgallons canisters in 1,380,000

senes gal/yr

25 Some pollutants Chlorine N/A N/Aemission rates are Hydrazinebased on previous Hydrochloric acid

permit valuesHydrogen fluoride

Methyl chloroform

Methylene chloride

Phosphine

Tetrachloroethylene

Titaniumtetrachloride

31 Waste Solvent Tanks: N/A Carbon 95% 15,000 gal/hr

Tanks 4.0 Canisters in 11,720,000series when gal/yr

SCC 15% annuallyunavailable sent to carbon

canisters31 Intermediate and N/A Carbon 95% 1,831.25 gal/hr

Final Product Tanks: Canisters in 8,790,000Tanks 4.0 series when gal/yr

SCC 15% annuallyunavailable

sent to carboncanisters



ControlSN Source


(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency32 Stack Testing Average of stack Baghouse N/A 2,542 bulbslhr

test: and Carbon * 0.63 lb/bulb

0.002lb/hr Adsorber * 24 hr/day >

PM/PMlO 38,435 lb/day

7.5E-6lblhrmercury

Plus a safety factor

33 Shredding and 0.0054 lb/ton each N/A N/A 12.5 tonlhrMixing: AP-42 Table activity 75,200 ton/yr

11.19.2-2 TertiaryCrushing of Stone

Waste Unloading and 0.000218lb/tonWaste Transfer: AP- each activity42 13.2.4 Equation 1

34 AP-42 Tables 1.3-1 Natural Gas Factors N/A N/A 33.75through 3,9 and 10 Distillate Factors MMBTUIhr

Tables 1.4-1 through4 1,664,000

gal/yr diesel

35, AP-42 Table 13.4-1 0.019lb/l000 N/A N/A 820 gal/minute36 gallons

37 AP-42 Table 4.7-1 8.34lb/ton Carbon 95% 14.1 tonlhr(Highest of Range) Canisters in 67,373 ton/yr

series whenSCC

unavailable

38 AP-42 Section 5.2 18.04Ib/1000 Carbon 99% 4,800 gallhrEquation 1 gallons Canisters in 1,771,000

senes gal/yr

HAPs estimatedbased on molecularweight and vapor

pressure



ControlSN Source


(AP-42, testing, etc.) Efficiency

39 AP-42 Section 5.2 6.22 lb/lOOO N/A N/A 4,400 gal/hrEquation 1 gallons 879,000 gal/yr

HAPs estimatedbased on molecularweight and vapor

pressure

40 AP-42 Section 5.2 7.464 lb/l 000 Vapor 90% 2 tankers/hrEquation 1 gallons Balance 6,000

System gal/tanker

HAPs estimated (emissions 6,153,000based on molecular sent back to gal/yrweight and vapor tanks)

pressure

41 Pumps, Flanges, Varied. See permit N/A N/A 28 pumpsValves: application for 749 valves

EPA's Protocol for emission factors 597 connectorsEquipment Leak

Emission Estimatesdated November 1995

13. TESTING REQUIREMENTS:

The permit requires testing of the following sources.

SN Pollutants Test Method Test Interval Justification

Once the new

01 Beryllium 104Air Pollution Part 61,

Control is Subpart Cinstalled

Once the new

01 Mercury lOlAAir Pollution Part 61,

Control is Subpart Einstalled

S02 Removal To ensure01

Efficiency6C Every Five Years compliance with

S02limits



To ensure01 Condensible PM 202 Every Five Years compliance with

PM limits

To ensure01 NOx 7E Once compliance with

NOx limits

CyanideCompounds,

To ensure01

Hydrazine, As Approved byOnce compliance with

HF, Phosphine, ADEQemission limits

Titaniumtetrachloride

0023A or 23 of

D/FPart 60 Appendix

A (approvalrequired)

Mercury 29

Lead and29

cadmium Every 61 monthsand after a

Arsenic, change in the

beryllium, and 29 design,

chromiumoperation, or

01 maintenance(Comprehensive

Carbon CO orpractices of the

NESHAPEEEPerformance source

Test) monoxide and Hydrocarbon [subsequenthydrocarbons CEMS comprehensive

26/26A of Part performance

60 Appendix A, tests waived for

320 or 3210fPart interim

63 Appendix A, standards]HCI and chlorine or ASTMD

gas 6735-01 and26/26A with

additionalrequirements

PM5 or 51of Part 60

Appendix A



Hydrocarbons Once unless(Destruction and Refer to

source isRemoval NESHAPEEE

modifiedEfficiency Test)

31 months afterthe previous

01 0023A or 23 ofcomprehensive

performance test(Confirmatory DIP Part 60 Appendix

[confirmatory NESHAPEEEPerformance A (approval

performanceTest) required)

tests waived forinterim

standards]

To ensure

03 -23 VOC content, compliance withQuarterly TLV table and

(groundwater) HAP content VOCandHAPlimits

To determine21

VOC21 See permit breakthrough.

concentrationSee CAM plan.

To determine25

VOC21 See permit breakthrough.

concentrationSee CAM plan.

34 Opacity 9 See NSPS Dc Per NSPS Dc

41 VOC 21Varied. See 60,

60, VVaVVa

Carbon Canistersfor Subpart DDSources (unless VOC 18 63,DD 63,DD

use designanalysis)

Incinerator forSubpart DD

VOC 18 63,DD 63,DD(unless usedesign analysis)

Leak Interface VOC 21 63,DD 63,DD


14. MONITORING OR CEMS

The permittee must monitor the following parameters with CEMS or other monitoringequipment (temperature, pressure differential, etc.)

Method

SNParameter or Pollutant (CEM,

FrequencyReport

to be Monitored Pressure (YIN)Gauge, etc.)

Daily - ONLY if

01 Mercury Emissions Monitorsrequirements of

YPlantwide Condition 34

are not met.

01 CO CEM Continuously Y

01 O2 CEM Continuously Y

01 Opacity COM Continuously Y

Not required untilAgency promulgates all

01 PM CEMperformance

N/Aspecifications and

operationalrequirements

Feedrates: Hazardous Waste;Ash; Chlorine and chloride;

01 Mercury; Semivolatile Metals; CMS Continuously YLow Volatility Metals;

Activated CarbonTemperature: Secondary

01 combustion chamber; waste CMS Continuously Yfired boiler

01 Flue gas flowrate CMS Continuously Y

01 Scrubber Pressure Drop CMS Continuously Y

01 Scrubber Liquid Flowrate CMS Continuously Y

01 Scrubber Liquid pH CMS Continuously Y

01Activated Carbon Carrier

CMS Continuously YFluid Flowrate

01Baghouse pressure drop, per

CMS Continuously Ycell

01Combustion Chamber

CMS Continuously Ypressure: Kiln; Secondary


Method

SNParameter or Pollutant (CEM,

FrequencyReport

to be Monitored Pressure (YIN)Gauge, etc.)

Combustion Chamber; WasteFired Boiler

41 Equipment Leaks See 60, VVa See 60, VVa

41 Equipment Leaks ofPumps 60.485a(b) Monthly Y

Equipment Leaks of Valves in41 GasNapor/Light Liquid 60.485a(b) Monthly Y

ServiceEquipment Leaks of

41Connectors in

60.485a(b) See 60, VVa YGas/Vapor/Light Liquid

Service

01, SCC Temperature CMS Continuously Y

01, SCC Vent Stream Flow CMS Hourly Y

SubpartConcentration of Organic

DD CarbonCompounds

CMS Continuously YCanisters

Daily or no greater thanSubpart

Concentration of Organic20% of the time

DD CarbonCompounds

CMS required to consume the YCanisters total carbon working

capacity

01, SCCConcentration of Organic

CMS Continuously YCompounds

15. RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS:

The following are items (such as throughput, fuel usage, VOC content, etc.) that must betracked and recorded.

SN Recorded Item Permit Limit FrequencyReport(YIN)

01 Opacity 20% Continuously N

01 S02 Emissions 21.2 tpy Monthly Y

01Utilization Rate of 74%

Monthly YRecovered Energy Maximum

03 Gallons of Water72,014,500

Monthly Ygallyr



07 Opacity 5% Weekly Y

07 Bag Filter Inspections N/A Daily Y

08 Natural Gas15,840,000

Monthly Yscf/yr

09 Opacity 5% Weekly N

09Number of trucks

624 trucks/yr Monthly Ycontaining lime

11 Gasoline 55,496 gal/yr Monthly Y

11Vapor Pressure of 6.2 psia at

As Needed NGasoline 70°F

12 Diesel Fuel109,716

Monthly Ygal/yr


17Number of trucks of

5 trucks/yr Monthly Ylime


18Number of trucks of

208 trucks/yr Monthly Yflyash

19 Lube oil 3,000 gal/yr Monthly Y


Operating plan for

21carbon canisters and

N/A N/A N/Amaintenanceperformed

21 Vessel Analysis Size N/A N

21 Organic liquids10,000,000

Monthly Ygallyr

21Vapor Pressure of tank 6.159 psia at

As Needed Ncontents 65°F



500 ppmv orgreater

VOC Concentration requires21 between carbon replacement See Permit Y

canisters ofone or bothcarbon

canisters

Inspection21 Documentation for N/A Daily Y

carbon canisters


25 Drum Filling 1,200,000 Monthly Ygal/yr

25 Waste Repackaging28,000 Monthly Y

drums/yr

25 Tanker and Railcar 100 rail tank Monthly YCleaning cars/yr

25 Tanker and Railcar 750 tank Monthly YCleaning trucks/yr

25 Tanker 100 Monthly YLoading/Unloading tankers/yr

25 Tanker 1200 tankers Monthly YLoading/Unloading pumped/yr

Vacuum Truck500,000 gal

25Loading

rain water Monthly Ycollection/yr

25 Equipment and Truck 260,000 gal Monthly YWash/Decontamination wash water/yr

3,000 vehicle25 Unpaved roads miles Monthly Y

trave1ed/yr2,100 vehicle

25 Paved roadsmiles traveled Monthly Yvia 18-whee1

traffic/yr113,360

vehicle miles

25 Paved roadstraveled via Monthly Y

CleanHarbors

vehicles/yr



25 Road MaintenanceN/A N/A N

Plan Recordkeeping

25 Railcar Loading1,380,000 Monthly Y

gal/yr500 ppmv or

greaterRailcar Loading: VOC requires

25 Concentration between replacement See Permit Ycarbon canisters of one or both

carboncanisters

Railcar Loading:

25Inspection

N/A Daily YDocumentation forcarbon canisters

31 Throughput of Waste 11,720,000 Monthly YSolvent gal/yr

Throughput of8,790,00031 Intermediate and Final Monthly Y

Productsgallyr

Throughput of waste1,758,00031 solvent while venting Monthly Y

to carbon canistergal/yr

Throughput of

31 intermediate and final 1,318,000 Monthly Yproducts while venting gal/yr

to carbon canister

31 Vapor Pressure of 6.159 psia at As Needed NTank Contents 65°F

32 Amount of bulbs 38,435 lbs of Daily Nprocessed per day bulbs/day



33 Throughput75,200 Monthly Ytons/yr

33 VOC and HAP content 0 As Needed N

34 Sulfur Content of0.3%

Per SupplierN

Diesel Certification

34 Diesel throughput1,664,000 Monthly Y

gallyr



34 Amount of fuel N/A Monthly Ncombusted per NSPS

34 Records required bySee NSPS See NSPS Y

NSPS

37 Throughput of Solvent67,373 Monthly Ytons/yr

Throughput of solvent10,10637 while venting to Monthly Y

carbon canistertons/yr

38 Loadout to Railcar1,771,000 Monthly Y

gallyr

39 Loadout to 55 gallon 879,000 Monthly Ydrums gallyr

40 Loadout to Tanker 6,153,000 Monthly YTrucks gallyr

41 Items specified inSee 60, VVa

Varied. SeeN

60.486a(a)(3) 60, VVa

Leak detected log As Needed41 (items specified in See 60, VVa when each N

60.486a(c)) leak detected

41 Log for 60.486a(e) See 60, VVa As Needed N

41 Log for 60.486aG) N/A As Needed N

41 See 60.487a(b) N/A Semiannual Y

41 See 60.487a(c) N/A Semiannual Y

::;50°F belowaverage

01, SCC Temperaturecombustion Continuous Ytemperatureduring mostrecent test

01, SCC Vent stream flowMust be Continuous Y

established63, Subpart DD

63.696(g)(1) and (g)(2) N/A Semiannual Nsources

Tanks (LevelInspections N/A Annual N2)

Closed vent Inspections and 63,DDsystems Monitoring

N/A63.695(c)

N



Closed ventcomplying with Inspections N/A 63.695(c)(2) N63.693(c)(1)(ii)

Closed ventDefect repair As Needed Nsystems N/A

63, Subpart DDMalfunctionscontrol device N/A As Needed Y

systems 63.696(h)(1) to (h)(3)

HAP concentration and

Plantwide TLV for waste SeeTLV As needed Nmaterials and tablegroundwater

See Plantwide

PlantwideDivert Stack Conditions

As needed YProcedures 12, 13, 15,

and 17

No limitspecified,

Plantwide Monthly Fuel Useused to show

Monthly Ncompliancewith NSPS

Dc

01Operating Record SeeNESHAP

As needed NRequirements EEE

33,000 lb/hr(kilns)

12,3401blhr ContinuouslyTotal Hazardous Waste (secondary

01 Feedrate combustion (Hourly yl

chamber) Rolling

3,9801b/hrAverage)

(waste firedboiler)



12,3401blhr(secondary

Continuouslycombustion

01Pumpable Hazardous chamber) (Hourly yl

Waste Feedrate3,9801blhr

Rolling

(waste firedAverage)

boiler)

Continuously01 Ash Feedrate 49,320 lb/hr (Rolling 12-hr yl

average)

Total Chlorine andContinuously

01 2,2411b/hr (Rolling 12-hr ylChloride Feedrate

average)

Continuously01 Mecury Feedrate 0.641blhr (Rolling 12-hr yl

average)

Semi volatile metalsContinuously

01 1751blhr (Rolling 12-hr ylfeedrate

average)

Low volatile metalsContinuously

01 4001blhr (Rolling 12-hr ylfeedrate

average)

Continuously

01Activated carbon

231blhr (Hourly ylfeedrate Rolling

Average)

Continuously

01Secondary combustion

1,848°F (Hourly ylchamber temperature Rolling

Average)

Continuously

01Waste fired boiler

1,881°F (Hourly yltemperature Rolling

Average)

Continuously

01 Flue gas flowrate 95,330 acfm (Hourly ylRolling

Average)



Continuously

01 Scrubber pressure drop 37 in. w.c. (Hourly ylRolling

Average)

Continuously

01Scrubber liquid

600 gpm (Hourly ylflowrate Rolling

Average)

Continuously

01 Scrubber liquid pH 2.7 (Hourly ylRolling

Average)

Continuously

01Activated carbon

30 scfm (Hourly ylcarrier fluid flowrate Rolling

Average)

1 in. w.c. Continuously

01Baghouse pressure (minimum) (Hourly yl

drop, per cell 16 in. w.c. Rolling(maximum) Average)

Combustion chamberpressure: kiln,

Below01 secondary combustion

atmosphericInstantaneous yl

chamber, waste firedboiler

01 CO Emissions 100 ppm Continuously yl

1. CMS performance report and summary report.16. OPACITY:

SN Opacity Justification for limitComplianceMechanism

01 20% Dept. Guidance COMS

04 5% Dept. Guidance Natural Gas as Fuel

07 5% Dept. Guidance Weekly

08 5% Dept. Guidance Natural Gas as Fuel





SN Opacity Justification for limitComplianceMechanism



25 Off-site 5% Dept. Guidance Inspections



34 20% NSPS Dc Performance Testingas required by NSPS

17. DELETED CONDITIONS:

Former SC I Justification for removal

N/A

18. GROUP A INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES

Source Group AEmissions (tpy)

Name Category PMlPM IO S02 VOC CO NOxHAPs

Single -I TotalNone requested with this permit application. This table will be updated when the facility

requests a new activity or when the permit is renewed.

19. VOIDED, SUPERSEDED, OR SUBSUMED PERMITS:

List all active permits voided/superseded/subsumed by the issuance of this permit.

Permit #

1009-AOP-R8

20. CONCURRENCE BY:

The following supervisor concurs with the permitting decision.

K~en Ce~Y::E.

APPENDIX A - EMISSION CHANGES AND FEE CALCULAnON

Fee Calculation for Major SourceRevised 08-30-11

Clean Harbors El Dorado, LLCPermit #: 1009-AOP-R9AFIN: 70-00098

$/ton factorPermit Type

Minor Modification Fee $Minimum Modification Fee $Renewal with Minor Modification $

Check if Facility Holds an Active Minor Source or MinorSource General PermitIf Hold Active Permit, Amt of Last Annual Air Permit Invoice $

Total Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)Initial Title V Permit Fee Chargeable Emissions (tpy)

22.65Minor Mod

5001000500

roo

Annual Chargeable Emissions (tpy)

Permit Fee $469.75

500

HAPs not included in VOC or PM:

Air Contaminants:

Chlorine, Hydrazine, HCI, HF, Methyl Chloroform, Methylene Chloride,Phosphine, Tetrachloroethylene, Titanium Tetrachloride

All air contaminants are chargeable unless they are included in othertotals (e.g., H2S04 in condensible PM, H2S in TRS, etc.)

Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable

Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions

PM IY' 63.4 63.4 0 0 63.4

PM 10 r 54 54 0

S02 IY' 60.6 60.6 0 0 60.6

VOC IY' 43.8 43.8 0 0 43.8

CO r 129.7 129.7 0

NOx IY' 170.2 170.2 0 0 170.2

Lead Compounds* r 0.24 0.24 0

Antimony Compounds* r 0.49 0.49 0

Arsenic Compounds* r 0.11 0.11 0

Beryllium Compounds* r 0.11 0.11 0

Cadmium Compounds* r 0.24 0.24 0

Calcium cyanamide* r 4.67 4.67 0

Chlorine*** r 46.52 46.52 0

Chromium Compounds* r 0.11 0.11 0

Cobalt Compounds* r 2.2 2.2 0

Cyanide Compounds* r 4.67 4.67 0

Dioxins/Furans* r 3.94E-07 3.94E-07 0

Hydrazine IY' 4.73 4.73 0 0 4.73

Hydrochloric acid IY' 47.89 47.89 0 0 47.89

Check if Permit Fee AnnualChargeable Old New Change in Chargeable Chargeable

Pollutant (tpy) Emission Permit Permit Emissions Emissions Emissions

Hydrogen fluoride ~ 27.31 27.31 0 0 27.31

Manganese Compounds* r 43.81 43.81 0

Mercury Compounds* r 0.140057 0.140057 0

Methyl chloroform ~ 11.38 11.38 0 0 11.38

Methylene chloride ~ 23.22 23.22 0 0 23.22

Nickel Compounds* r 8.77 8.77 0

Phosphine ~ 4.73 4.73 0 0 4.73

Phosphoms* r 4.67 4.67 0

Selenium Compounds* r: 21.91 21.91 0

Tetrachloroethylene ~ 7.66 7.66 0 0 7.66

Titanium tetrachloride ~ 4.73 4.73 0 0 4.73

Single Organic HAP* r 30.62 30.62 0

Total Organic HAP* r 40.96 40.96 0

H2S ~ 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.1

For the issuance ofAir Permit # 1009-AOP-R9 AFIN: 70 …€¦ · · 2011-11-23the metal that has...

Documents

Transcript of For the issuance ofAir Permit # 1009-AOP-R9 AFIN: 70 …€¦ · · 2011-11-23the metal that has...