For Each and Every Child” — And Why Funding Reform is ... by: Ralph M. Martire, Executive...
-
Upload
duongtuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
3
Transcript of For Each and Every Child” — And Why Funding Reform is ... by: Ralph M. Martire, Executive...
Presented by:Ralph M. Martire, Executive Director
F o r :N a t i o n a l C o n f e r e n c e o f S t a t e L e g i s l a t o r s
G e o r g i a W o r l d C o n g r e s s C e n t e r2 8 5 A n d r e w Y o u n g I n t e r n a t i o n a l B l v d . , N W
A t l a n t a , G e o r g i a
“For Each and Every Child” — And Why Funding Reform is Crucial to Enhancing Student Achievement
70 East Lake StreetSuite 1700 Chicago, IL 60601www.ctbaonline.org
August 12, 2013© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
The Equity & Excellence Commission’s Charge was to Advise the DOE on:
August 12, 2013
2
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
“the disparities in meaningful educational opportunities that give rise to the
achievement gap, with a focus on systems of finance, and to recommend ways to which
federal policies could address such disparities.”
Why Was that the Charge?
August 12, 2013
3
Public Education in America is not so much “Broken” as it is under-resourced to education all children
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Test Scores
August 12, 2013
4
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
The International Benchmark: Combined PISA (Reading, Math, Science, Critical Thinking)
Overall, U.S. schools scored a middling 500 with the OECD average @ 493
Reality #1
August 12, 2013
5
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
But adjusting for poverty
U.S. schools w/ 0-10% poverty scored 551, best in the world (Finland was 2nd @ 536)
U.S. schools w/ 10-24.9% poverty scored 527, top in the world for similar profiles (Canada was 2nd @ 524 and 4th overall )
Poverty
August 12, 2013
6
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
U.S. scores did not start to drop until poverty got over 25%
In Illinois, roughly 44% of kids live in poverty.
In CPS, the number is over 88%.
So the Charge of the Commission was on Point—The Core Issues Remain:
August 12, 2013
7
Poverty
and
Insufficient ResourcesInequitably Distributed
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Which is Nothing New
August 12, 2013
8
Who first noted these as core issues in U.S. Education
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
“Who”
August 12, 2013
9
The NIXON COMMISSION on Education in 1972!
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
The Nixon Commission Found:
August 12, 2013
10
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
1. Educational funding at the state level is too tied to property taxes—and rarely is connected to the educational needs of children.
2. Money can help solve many of the Educational Problems that have surfaced.
3. States have the responsibility to reform school financing to eliminate disparities and ensure adequacyIf they don’t......
The Solution
August 12, 2013
11
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Scan Available Resources, Match to Demographically Driven Needs
Create a Comprehensive, Strategic Approach to System Changes Needed to Attain Desirable Outcomes
Integrate: Federal, state, local resources/programs to accomplish
outcomes; Utilize evidence-based approaches and advocacy, bridge rather
than reinforce ideological divides; Minimize inefficient competition maximize collaboration; and Develop resources to build and sustain the capacity needed for
success.
Evidence this Approach Works:
August 12, 2013
12
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Current Focus of Global Education Reform Movement (“GERM”)
Set higher standards for student achievement—standardize education generally
Enhance accountability metrics and implement punitive consequence matrix
Enhance competition between and among schools and educators
Impact of GERM on Programme for International Assessment or “PISA” Math Scores
August 12, 2013
13
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
2000 2009 USA 493 487 UK 529 492 AUSTRALIA 533 514 JAPAN 557 529 NEW ZEALAND 537 519
Then There’s Finland
August 12, 2013
14
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Rejected GERM Focused on: Building collaboration/reducing competition; Building teaching profession; Investing adequately in poorest schools on up, focusing
on equity as core to excellence; Invest in early childhood, wrap-around services and
overall education funding; GOAL Build capacity so that every school provides
high quality education tailored to meet student need
The Results
August 12, 2013
15
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
PISA Math Scores2000 2009
536 541
The Goal
Implementing a strategic, comprehensive approach for sustainable systems reform that:
August 12, 2013
16
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Is driven by evidence and best practice
Bridges, rather than reinforces, ideological divides
Results in promoting economic & social justice
Finance
August 12, 2013
17
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
A State Should: Identify and publicly report the teaching staff, programs and
services needed to provide a “meaningful educational opportunity” to all students of every race and income level (including ELL and special needs) BASED ON EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVE EDUCATION PRACTICES;
Adopt and implement school finance systems that provide equitable/sufficient funding for all students to achieve content and performance standards;
“Equitable” in some case means more than equal investment—as in other advanced nations, it includes providing additional resources for at-risk populations.
Finance Continued
August 12, 2013
18
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
The Feds Should: Direct states, with appropriate incentives, to adopt school
finance systems that provide a meaningful educational opportunity for all students;
Enact “Equity and Excellence” legislation that:
i. Targets significant new federal funding to schools with high concentrations of low-income students, particularly where achievement gaps exist;
ii. Provides significant financial incentives to states that in fact enhance investment in “At-Risk” children.
What Will be Funded?
August 12, 2013
19
Building Educational Capacity.—For purposes of this Act, building education capacity of Targeted Schools will mean implementing systems-based reforms, programs and/or initiatives which have been demonstrated, either in the United States or in any other nation, to enhance student achievement, learning and/or critical thinking skills over time. Such reforms, programs and/or initiatives MAY include:
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Silo Mentality & Gaps, Overlaps
Failure to Coalesce Around a national, evidence-based strategy to drive systems reform
Lack of Capacity (Human, Service, Fiscal) to Generate and Sustain Meaningful, Evidence-Based Reform
Counterproductive Competition
Disjointed State, Local, Federal Efforts to Define and Meet Needs
Inefficient and Underproductive Resource Allocation/Service Delivery
August 12, 2013
20
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Partisan Rhetoric, Pandering to Worst Instincts, Designed to Create Political Advantage
Consider — IllinoisEnacted P-12 Appropriations for FY2014 Compared to FY2000
Enacted, Nominal & Adjusted for Inflation (ECI) and Population
August 12, 2013
21
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
28.8%
-16.69%-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
% Change (Nominal) % Change (ECI + Pop)
Sources: Sources: FY2000 unadjusted appropriations from Governor’s final budget summary for FY2000; and FY2014 CTBA analysis of GOMB, FY 2014 Operating Budget Detail (March 6, 2013), http://www2.illinois.gov/gov/budget/Pages/BudgetBooks.aspx. Inflation for healthcare inflated by Midwest Medical Care CPI; all other appropriations adjusted using ECI-C and Midwest CPI from the BLS as of January 2013, and population growth from the Census Bureau as of January 2013.
Dollar Shortfall in State Per-Pupil K-12 Education Funding to Meet EFAB Adequate Education Standard by Fiscal Year
August 12, 2013
22
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
$0 -$120
-$1,270 -$1,269
-$2,553
-$2,747
-$2,946
-$3,500
-$3,000
-$2,500
-$2,000
-$1,500
-$1,000
-$500
$0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Sources: CTBA analysis of January 2013 EFAB data. Education Funding Advisory Board, Illinois Education Funding Recommendations, (Springfield, IL: January, 2013), p. 9.Appropriations adjusted using ECI and Midwest Medical Care CPI (for Healthcare) from the BLS as of January 2013, and population growth from the Census Bureau as of January 2013.
And YEAH, $ Does Appear to Matter
August 12, 2013
23
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Regression of ISAT Performance Vs. Per-pupil Instructional Expenditure for School Districts with 3-8% Low Income Rates
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
3000 5000 7000 9000 11000 13000
Per-pupil Instructional Expenditure
Perc
ent o
f Stu
dent
s M
eetin
g an
d Ex
ceed
ing
Illin
ois
Stan
dard
s on
the
ISAT
(200
6)
Active Model Conf. interval (Mean 95%) Conf. interval (Obs. 95%)
*Linear regression is a statistical analysis that shows the correlation of two or more variables, in this case, how per-pupil expenditures correspond to ISAT test scores. The regression line (heavy red) represents the predicted test score results a school district should obtain, given a specific level of instructional expenditure.
Local and State Share of Education Funding Spending
August 12, 2013
24
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Source: National Center on Education Statistics, 2011. “Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year 2008-2009 (Fiscal Year 2009).”
The Burden is Tough
August 12, 2013
25
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
42.12%
2.84%
17.41%
0.83%0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
1990-2005 2000-2005
Illinois Total Property Tax Revenue Growth Vs. State Median Income Growth
Total Property TaxRevenue GrowthState Median IncomeGrowth
All data inflation adjusted to 2008
Income Data: US Department of Census
Property Tax Data: IL Department of Revenue
Really????
August 12, 2013
26
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
YES: Illinois ranks 50th out of 50 states in portion of education funding covered by the state
But Education now matters more than ever to economic prosperity:
Generally: unemployment rates are highest for those with the least education.
Unemployment Highest Among Least Educated, 2010
August 12, 2013
27
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
18.8
%
12.0
%
9.1%
6.9%
21.9
%
13.1
%
9.4%
5.2%
20.7
%
12.9
%
9.3%
5.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
LT HS HS Grad Some Col BA or +
Per
cen
t U
nem
plo
yed
Source: EPI Analysis of CPS Data
Nation
Midwest
Illinois
Wages for Minorities Lag Whites
August 12, 2013
28
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Real wages for Whites increased modestly between 1980 and 2010, but :
The White-Hispanic wage gap is larger in amount, but increased by a smaller percentage, growing from $4.01 in 1980 to $5.86 in 2010, an increase of 46%over 1980
Real wages for African-Americans declined. The hourly wage gap between Whites and African-Americans grew from $1.60 in 1980 to $3.08 in 2010, an increase of 92.3% over 1980
Source: Appropriations from and FY2014 CTBA analysis SB 2555, SB 2556, HB 206, HB 208, HB 213, HB 214, HB 215, passed by the 98th
General Assembly; and hard costs from FY2014 GOMB Budget Book.
*This is the 23rd consecutive fiscal year with a General Fund deficit*
Category GOMB Revenue HJR-17 Revenue(i) Projected FY2014 Revenue $35.63 $35.08(ii) Projected FY2014 Hard Costs $11.16 $11.16
(iii) Projected Deficit Carry Forward from FY2014 $8.3 $8.3
(iv) Projected Net FY2014 General Fund Revenue Available for Services $16.17 $15.62
(v) Projected Net General Fund Service Appropriations $24.52 $24.52
(vi) Estimated Minimum FY2014 General Fund Deficit ($8.35) ($8.9)
(vii) Estimated Deficit as a Percentage of General Fund Service Appropriations -34.05% -36.29%
FY2014 Accumulated Deficit ($ Billions)
August 12, 2013
29
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
That Huge Shortfall is a Real Problem Because……Over $9 out of $10 of G.F. are Spent on:
August 12, 2013
30
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Education (PreK-12 plus Higher Ed) 35%
Healthcare 30%
Human Services 21%
Public Safety 5%91%
FY2014 Enacted General Fund Services Appropriations (excluding Group Health & Pensions) Relative to FY2000, in Nominal and
Adjusted for Inflation and Population Growth
August 12, 2013
31
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Sources: FY2000 unadjusted appropriations from Governor’s final budget summary for FY2000; and FY2014 CTBA analysis SB 2555, SB 2556, HB206, HB 208, HB 213, HB 214, HB 215, passed by the 98th General Assembly. Inflation for healthcare inflated by Midwest Medical Care CPI; all other appropriations adjusted using ECI-C and Midwest CPI from the BLS as of January 2013, and population growth from the Census Bureau as of January 2013
Capitalist Tax Policy Should Be:
August 12, 2013
32
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
FAIR PROGRESSIVE
RESPONSIVE TO MODERN ECONOMY
STABLE DURING POORECONOMIES
EFFICIENT DOESN’T DISTORTPRIVATE MARKETS
ILLINOIS IS 0 for 4
Which Creates a Structural Deficit
August 12, 2013
33
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Revenues of Goods and Services as a Percent of Gross Domestic Product: Illinois (SIC 1965-1985, NAICS: 1997-2012)
August 12, 2013
34
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
36%41%
53%
68%72% 73%
32%
26%20% 21% 19% 17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1965 1975 1985 1997 2005 2012
Services as a percent of GDP
Goods as a percent of GDP
Private producing industries Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis
Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, contended that for a tax system to be fair it has to be progressive
August 12, 2013
35
According to Smith:
"The subjects of every state ought to contribute toward the support of the government, as nearly
as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue
which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state ….[As Henry Home (LordeKames) has written, a goal of taxation should be
to] 'remedy inequality of riches as much as possible, by relieving the poor and burdening the
rich.'"
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
The long-term trends in income distribution in America demonstrate that his reasoning was solidly on target.
Source: Economic Policy Institute's website: http://stateofworkingamerica.org/who-gains/ Data used is from Piketty and Saez, "Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 2003, 1-39 (Tables and Figures Updated to 2011 in Excel format, January 2013), http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/ .
Change in Average US IncomeGrowth Over Time
Income Group 1979 — 2011
Top 10% 139.8%
Bottom 90% -39.8%
Change in Average US IncomeGrowth Over Time
Income Group 1947— 1979
Top 10% 34.1%
Bottom 90% 65.9%
Was Adam Smith Right?
August 12, 2013
36
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
And it Won’t Hurt the Economy
August 12, 2013
37
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
From 2000 - 2010 9 states with highest graduated income tax rate structures had:
Better growth in state GDP per capita Better change in median wage Identical unemployment rate
Than the 9 states with NO income tax
Source: Institute on Tax and Economic Policy
For More Information
August 12, 2013
38
Ralph M. Martire Bobby OtterExecutive Director Education and Fiscal Policy Analyst(312) 332-1049 (312) [email protected] [email protected]
© 2013, Center for Tax and Budget Accountability
Website: www.ctbaonline.org