Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019 · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019...
Transcript of Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Sep 23, 2019 · irul!m.i! sep 1 7 2019...
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
1n)
SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PARV ; :
NYS SUPREME CG . • •
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
XWALTER E. POTOCKI, Index No: 190032/2012
Plaintiff, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Defendant GARDNER DENVER, INC. with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is,
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims defendant, GARDNER DENVER, INC. are
F I L E Ddismissed with prejudice and without costs.
/Vc/K I j SEP 23 2019
UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE/NB/VYORK
Dated: 2019New York, New York
5qT fcAnrk 3. fogNBERG, PC
Andre\jt-WTueanVEsq.SEGAL McGAMBRIDGEStfNGER &JIAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for defendantGardner Denver, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022(212) 651-7500
Adam DufcsfiWEITZ & L*Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C .
waited L
p H P vU Q ILTJ V^7 L r.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION fA;r i .
NYS SUPitBii n . - . Yr <.r. Y
XThis Document Relates To:
JOSEPH ZAHRA Index No.: 190015-2012
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Rov aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. C I I 1^Dated: New York, New York SEP 23 M
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICEYORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .
RECEIVEDAUG 2 2 2019
WS SUWEME COURT - CIVIL__ TRIAL SUPPORTSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, M.)
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 1148 3 Z
ANGELO SCAGNELLI UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross-claims against Sid Harvey Industries, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Sid Harvey Industries, Inc.,
F I L E Dare dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust / i f i . 2019 SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SP1TZER, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsAngelo Scagnelli14 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005(212) 267-3091
Erin N. Miter, Esq.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsSid Harvey Industries, Inc.80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. MendezMANUEL J. MENDEZ
j.s.c.66-0043U
( N0896691-1}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XSEP 1 7 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
X PART J.NYS SUPREME COURT • C « ViL
ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estateof JAMES PEARLSTEIN, and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)
Plaintiff(s), Index No.: 190027/11-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
ALFA LAVAL INC., et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all
claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissedF I L E Dwith prejudice and without costs.
Mo//? SEP 23 2019Dated:New York, New York
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEK NEW YORK
Clw’fstopher A. Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Tara L|. Pehush, Esq.K&t GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJS.C.303694350 v1
Hy
SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FV. P.7 13NYS SUPPBiE COURT - CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
XThis document Relates to:ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.: 190027/11JAMES PEARLSTEIN and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiff(s),
- against -ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.;
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER- BROOKS, INC request summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross claims against CLEAVER- BROOKS, INC. with prejudice, and after notice
to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants CLEAVER- BROOKS,
F I L E DINC. are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.SEP 23 2019DATED: New York, New York71 , 2019
COUNJY'CLERK'S OFFICEN X NEW YORK
CHri/Romanelli, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Halbardier, Esq.Attorneys for CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore LLC101 Greenwich Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Suz;
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
. i
SEP 1 7 2Q 19SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p - ;vr 13
NYS su°r;3; i.: courr - CIVILXNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYABESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document Relates to:ANN PEARLSTEIN, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.: 190027/11JAMES PEARLSTEIN and ANN PEARLSTEIN,Individually,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGEMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Plaintiffs),
- against -ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.;
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants TWIN DISC INC. request summary judgment in the above-
entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint
and cross claims against TWIN DISC INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants
there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross claims against defendants TWIN DISC INC. are
F I L E Ddismissed with prejudice and without costs.
SEP 23 2019DATEDyNew Ycrk, New York, 2019
UNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Halbardier, Esq.Attorneys for TWIN DISC INC.Barry McTieman & Moore LLC101 Greenwich Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Chris Romanelli, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg P.C700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
uz
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .
-•=1ri_i
SEP 1 7 20)9SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITYi /Vf:
NVS SUPREME CNYCALI.A.S.(J. Mendez)
XPart'~T-3-~
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
This Document Relates to:SEAN WILBUR, Individually and as
Administrator of the Estate ofHERBERT W. WILBUR,
Index No.: 190389/10
Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
- against -ASBEKA INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK, INC.,individually and as successor to
Asbeka Asbestos Corp., et al.,
Defendants.X
INC. ,defendant, . DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK,WHEREFORE,
s/h/a DAV CORPORATION, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section §3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
defendant DAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC., with prejudice, and
after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition; it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
iJmJ^s w prejudiceDAVID FABRICATORS OF NEW YORK, INC. ar
and without costs.SEP 23 2019
Dated: New York, New York
^ft4- 2019 COUNTYCL K’S OFFIC0S’
S' s sjS
cfJoseph M. Angiolillo, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantDavid Fabricators of NY, Inc.44 Wall Street, 14New York, New YorkOur File No.: 11279/75
Arthur G. Prystowsky, .Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & SpitzerAttorneys for PlaintiffEstate of Herbert W. Wilbur14 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005
thSuite 6B Floor10005
SO ORDERED:
Hon. Manuel Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ S C.
kPrQ) ^ 0 L
SEP 1 7 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART i3NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL
—xThis Document Relates To:
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDERON BEHALF OF FORDMOTOR COMPANY
BARBARA BURNHAM, as Proposed Executrixof the Estate of WILLIAM EDWARDBURNHAM and DOROTHY I. BURNHAM,Individually,
Plaintiffs), Index No.: 190487/2011
-against-A.O.SMITH CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendant(s). —x
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and cross-claims against defendant FORD MOTORCOMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claim and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTORCOMPANY be and the same as^ hereby dismissed with prejuf^Sajd ^thoi^os^^SEP 23 2019
/ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE- /NEMLYORKBy: Nancy L. Pennie, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
Dated: NewYorlc, New Yoamlrnioyfi A
Af i.
By: BELLUCK546 Fifth AvenijNew York, NeuCounsel for:Pilifhtiffs
FJMELPw" Floorbrk 10036
SO ORDERED:>N. MANUEL J. MENDEZMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.655112M
I—T r-! if • riruL ! .i !!M
SEP 1 7 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Pari 13(Mendez, J .)
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONWARD A. REYNOLDS and CAROLREYNOLDS,
Index No.: 190276/2011Plaintiffs,
- against - UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, and after notice to all
co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Aurora Pump Company are
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
jb vys'l 5*
Dated : , 2019New York, New York
' ^ l.IL.i
Sarah R. Haag-Fisk.SEGAL MeCAMBKIDGE N
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
Patti Burshtyn, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG , P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
FILEDTAXSO ORDERED,Manuel J . Mendez. J .S.C.
SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'SNEWYORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .
OFFICE
United Lawyers
P i p f fLi U irr.3 v:
: I—! •
n : j L.JSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
LL-”i U
SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
PART .13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
Index No.: 110349-2004WILLIAM RYAN,
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
V'° / / 1
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
F I L E DSO ORDERED,
SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lawyer$
r_)r—r~
rtlE^ iSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
i
LT ~j ; j Ln
X SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
This Document Relates To:
WALTER PORTER and MARGARET PORTER, Index No.: 101524-1994
Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.C. & S., INC., formerly ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING AND SUPPLY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York SEP 2 3 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. 'WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
» >
UnitediavtyQfSIF3 If
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
DIETER ENGELHARDT, Index No.: 190064-2008
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
SEP 2 3 2019
C9UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
^ NEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .
'I
fto’edr awyenT
: rv' ' lAJsIHsleiL^,
; ;SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
V. •
X SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XThis Document Relates To:
BARRY GERENSTEIN, Index No.: 101909/2007
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defgfltfaitf Milto^RoiMredismissed without prejudice and without costs. I I »"
SEP 2 3 2019Dated: New York, New York
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEEW YORK
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
t United Lawyefs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r~::-
X•. /NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION SEP 17 2019X IPART 13This Document Relates To: Pi COURT CIVIL
KEVIN MCDONALD, Index No.: 117938-2006
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. p I IDated: New York, New York SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEYORK
7Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lawyei$
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
P- C-, r--- V " -. i7-~ H fr7
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)SEP 1 7 2019In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
P/.RT 13NYS SUP.'£.--i = COURT - CIVILX
This Document Relates To:
WAYNE R. SMITH, Index No.: 118275-2006
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against dedismissed without prejudice and without costs.
SEP 23 2019Dated: New York, New York
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEMEW YORK
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
Kevin M. Berry, EsqWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ s.c
Uiuiea Lawyers' j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
|P)
xNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)SEP 1 7 2019In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
This Document Relates To:
ROBERT S. KNAPP III, Index No.: 190121-2009
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
^̂ JJEWYORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.s.c.
unitedLawyers
aSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
jL i r r j V
SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 1 j
NYS SUPREME COURT - CfVIlX
This Document Relates To:
CHARLES F. LAURIA, Index No.: 117937-2006
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York SEP * 3 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
United Lawyers
“i.Li- Lb:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
PART 13NYS SU-KT :CO’ ' T - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
HENRY J. LINES, Index No.: 116956/2007
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
SEP 23 2019
OUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
A*Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
b‘<V .UucttG^UnitedLawyers
'6) [ -- (p'- i _^ li- fj
. ! •.SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xSEP 1 7 2019NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONPART 13
NYS SUPRSS*= COURT - CIVILX
This Document Relates To:
FRANK GIACCONE and URSULA GIACCONE, Index No.: 116090/2006
Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -CLARK-RELIANCE CORPORATION, et al
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
' /t o l l 9 SEP 2 3 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEt NEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
iu *
&8iteaiawysrsp) pif u."' U ' ;. : .Vs.* i 'r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
CHARLES JOHN MOCERA, Index No.: 101713-2007
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Rgy «•&
dismissed without prejudice and without costs. I-|!** *» ***
SEP 23 im
COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
\ **
6d^WJ... 5
[REG ’ • > : !SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 Z019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)P,-iR7 j. 3In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SL’PRHN'i COJYT
XThis Document Relates To:
JOSEPH L. PULEO, Index No.: 108261-2007
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendadismissed without prejudice and without costs.
SEP »S 2013
CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
COUNTY
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
r f\SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .
United Lawyers
©fi (fU U - -V
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 1 7 2019X
i > -\TV;NYS SUPl‘:r; - - f ; </>NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
v ;
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
JAMES NYARADY, Index No.: 103070-2007
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defenddismissed without prejudice and without costs.
p|.lt£ Rg apSEP 23 2019Dated: New York, New York
1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE„ NEW YORKcA&
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.
UnitedLawyers
Q) n=u aSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
JAMES EASON, Index No.: 110350-2004
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendismissed without prejudice and without costs.
cfftTv
SEP 28 2019Dated: New York, New York
1 1 0 1 1 1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 1 7 2019XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION p ' p — J
NYSsuFr.F '- i co'yvr - CIVIL
xThis Document Relates To:
ROBERT D’ULISSE, Index No.: 110351-2004
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
SEP 23 2019
©UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
^ NEW YORK
9
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J . Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
GilS
— •,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)NYS SUP;-;' rr.‘.In Re; NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION J
xThis Document Relates To:
LAWRENCE CAVALLO, Index No.: 190122-2009
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. F I L E DDated: New York, New York
ihk SEP 2 3 20191
NEW YORK
?C AKevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
UnitedLawyers
—- / -Si[ (IniSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)PIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPRES CO
XThis Document Relates To:
MARGARET J. BLUNDA, Executrix of the Estate ofVITO FRANCIS BLUNDA,
Index No.: 190385-2009
Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER- against -
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Miltondismissed without prejudice and without costs. I-|
SEP * 3 2019
OUNTY CLERKSOFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
% jdn
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S . r
United Lawyers
/i fSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x SEP 1 7 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION iPART I J
NYS SUPREf-i C O'J Z" cnX
This Document Relates To:
WILLIAM LOUGHLIN, Index No.: 115660-2005
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -GENERAL ELECRIC COMPANY, et al.
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendantdismissed without prejudice and without costs. n L E D
SEP 2 8 2019Dated: New York, New York
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
United Lawyers
D) -SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART , •
NYS SUPn-T" c:.X
This Document Relates To:
LOUIS LATUDA, Index No.: 190063-2008
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defenddismissed without prejudice and without costs. ip" N|ilt(|^R ai|^
SEP 2 8 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
ll^Jn
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lavvyeis
r5) r-SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)PART LIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYS SUPREME: CO'jrr - CfVlL
XThis Document Relates To:
MARGARET STEIN, as Executrix of the Estate ofFREDERICK STEIN,
Index No.: 115680-2006
Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
AND ORDER- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. 'FI L E nDated: New York, New York
SEP * 8 2913
UNTY CLERK'S OFFICE** NEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
r\̂SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENtiEZJ .S.C.
United Lawyers
irLir
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019
XNYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)
PART 13NYS SUPREME COU.- T CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
STEPHEN ZBORAY, Index No.: 109669-2005
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Mihon fray ML
dismissed without prejudice and without costs. | I V*
SEP * 3 7019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Dated: New York, New York
3/^A
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J, MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lawyers
IS) ; !
UHiiSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)NYS SUPREME COU .r:'
• - jIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
ROBERT HOPE, Index No.: 190250/2011
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. V?|^Dated: New York, New York
$E? * 3 2019
TY CLERK'S OFFICE
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
Kevin M. Berry, EsqWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lawyers
1SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 7 2019X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)PAicr i ?,
MVS SUFI'S' - COURT - CIVILIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xThis Document Relates To:
EDWARD J. GALETTI, Index No.: 190292-2011
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.O. SMITH COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendantdismissed without prejudice and without costs. nrenDated: New York, New York SEP 23 2019q j i 0 l l 7
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. IWILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
/ NSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
United Lawyers
f ]SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x SEP 17 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13
(Mendez, J.)In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION P-'- R- iNys SUPfcjr ii C J :: ,
XThis Document Relates To:
JOHN REGAN, Index No.: 190169/2011
Plaintiff,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
- against -A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
x
WHEREFORE, defendant MILTON ROY, LLC, (hereinafter “Milton Roy”),incorrectly sued herein as MILTON ROY COMPANY, by its attorneys Harris Beach PLLC,hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil PracticeLaw and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Milton Roywithout prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant Milton Roy aredismissed without prejudice and without costs. f l 1. E DDated: New York, New York
SEP w 3 Z0J8
*NTY CLiRK'i OFFICEYORK
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZERAttorneys for Plaintiffs14 Wall Street, Suite 6BNew York, NY 10005
Abbie Eliasberg Fuchs, Esq.HARRIS BEACH PLLCAttorneys for Milton Roy, LLC100 Wall Street, 23rd FloorNew York, NY 10005
/—\SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
/VJGM £ F=U£bSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X NYCAL• I .A.S. Part 46(Mendez, M.)
IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis Document Relates to: Index No: 103797/1999
WERNER R. and MARIE ULRICH UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
X
WHEREFORE, defendant REYNOLDS METAL COMPANY, requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 321*2, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against REYNOLDS METAL COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice
to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant REYNOLDS METAL
F I L E DCOMPANY, are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.* , <
Dated : / 7 i • i . 2019 SEP i S 2019
iOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
New YdrL New York
i/... -"S i >• ,. < /
S. Howarth, Esquire1th D. Babula, Esquire
WILBRAHAM, LAWLER & BUBA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, New York, 10005Attorneys for Defendant, Reynolds Metal Company
JI .aura Green, EsquireWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorneys for Plaintiffs
r^pr̂ -\/7p[FSO ORDERED,MANUEL J . MENDEZ, J .S.C.
SEP 0 3 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Ki “."D- V
SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PAP. : i. ;NYS SUPREME • •
• CIVILNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Index No.: 120392/2001NORMAN FREDDIE GABEL and ELIZABETHGABEL,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),
- against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE Defendant A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY (“A. O.
SMITH”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against
Defendant A. O. SMITH with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A. Q. SMITH are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
, 2019
dL
Qn&Uti b d f O l O , Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 286-6442 F I L E DSO ORDERED, SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Hon. Manuel J. Mendez{S0101437.1}
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S.C .
1rz:.“v. /7!IrtiE^Eu v L±i
SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CiVILNYCAL ^I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 120392/01104094/02
NORMAN FREDDIE GABEL and ELIZABETH GABEL, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne ew York2019
John J. Fa.CullenAttorney forNATIONAL GRI44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
Andrew J. Gayoso, Esq.WEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
ng,/issq.nd/Dykmzm LLP
defendantD GENERATION LLC
FILEDSO ORDERED,MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
SEP *8mMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
Du
SEP 11 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 112732/00
ROBERT O'NEILL and LORRAINE O'NEILL, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York% , £> 2019
SETEsq.Charles Ferguson,
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
John J. Fanning, Esq.Cullen and'2)ykman LLPAttorney for DefendantNATIONAL GlRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StlreetNew York, NY--(212)732-2000
0005
FILEDSEP is M'9ZY\SO ORDERED,
RK’S OFFICEMANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
COUNTEWVORK
D 5c !U:a V
SEP 11 2019 i:
PART 13 |NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL jSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 103433/01119381/00
ROBERT S. MARTILLO, UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no
opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkR. Si . 2019
tr~, EsTJ. John J. F
Cullen an^Dykmarf LLPAttorney ffor DefendantNATIONAL/GRID44 Wall Gtre^New Yorky-NY(212)732-2000
ing, JEsq.Charles Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.
’
C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
INERATION LLC
10005
F I L E DSEP 23
«wnSg^0Fn“SO ORDERED,
MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SEP 11 2019PART 13
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
This Document Relates to: Index No.: 105972/00121985/99
MARVIN W. FREEMAN and DORA FREEMAN,UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), requests summary judgment in the above-entitledaction, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the
complaint and cross-claims against NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and
after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York, 2019
Charles Ferguson,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
John J.Cullen /
AttorneNATION[H44 Wall'New York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
anning, Esq.d Dykjnan LLPfor defendantGRJD GENERATION LLCfsreet
s®.
FILEDSO ORDERED,
SEP 2 3 2019
COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SEP 11 2019PART 13
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
This Document Relates to: Index No.:190099/2009
ROBERT J. PECORARO, as Executor for theEstate of DOLORES PECORARO, andROBERT J. PECORARO, Individually,
UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a
NATIONAL GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION
LLC f/k/a LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against
NATIONAL GRID with prejudice, and after notice to all co-
defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant
NATIONAL GRID are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New f,J New York2019
David A. LIThe FerrariAttorneys(/Brickell y600 Brickell Avenue, Suite 3800Miami, Florida 33131(305)375-0111
inzer, Esq./iaw Firmor Plaintiffsrid Plaza
John /J. Fanning, \Esq.Cullen andr Dykman LLPAttorney /for DefendantNATIONAL/GRID44 Wall Etree,
New York^NY(212)732-2000
NERATION LLC
10005
F I L E DZ^\MANUEL'J. MENDEZ, J.S.C.
SO ORDERED, SEP 23 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ
J.S.C.
®ECSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 11 2019IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)
I- TV j 3NYS SUPP-BT: COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates To:
Index No.: 108518/2002SALVATORE CAMMARATA and ANTOINETTECAMMARATA,
UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
- against -
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), etal.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE Defendant A. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY (“A. O.
SMITH”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint and cross-claims against
Defendant TACO INC. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition,
it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A. O. SMITH are dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: White Plains, New York
, 2019
Erik Jacobs, Esq. CAttorney for PlaintiffsjWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA. O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 286-6442
F I L E DSEP 28 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C .
{S0101437.1}
. '
3•
SEP 11 2019SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART iNYS SUPREME COURT TH-IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL L
I.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)This Document Relates To:
Index No.: 190005/2011DWIGHT LOWELL ALLEN, JR., asExecutor of the Estate of ROBINBISHOP ALLEN, deceased, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS
COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against defendant A.O. SMITH WATER
PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without cost.
Dated: White Plains, New York
a , 2018
Laura B. HollmaryfesjfAttorney for DefmytantA.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
BELLUCEK BdfDX, LLPAttorneysfar Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036
F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.
SEP 2 3 2019
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.
{V0560720.1}
!{
* SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
/ jf J
V 'TV
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
; NYCAL! I.A.S. Part 13• (Mendez, J.)
SEP 11 2019T- r i:
NYS SUPRL- !- :;ouThis Document Relates to: CIVIL
Index No.: 190451/2011RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN UNOPPOSED SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY hereby
requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§ 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint and cross-claims against Defendant A.O. SMITH
WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is
no opposition, it is
ORDERED, that all claims and cross-claims against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER
PRODUCTS COMPANY are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK
t f i ,2019
Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Nicholas W. Maiorano, Esq.Attorney for DefendantECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Ste. 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.
MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.
SEP 23 2019COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
{S0102675.1}