FOIA Request Letter re UCoR Ads on UTA Trains
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
appignani-humanist-legal-center -
Category
Documents
-
view
303 -
download
4
Transcript of FOIA Request Letter re UCoR Ads on UTA Trains
![Page 1: FOIA Request Letter re UCoR Ads on UTA Trains](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100601/5571fb73497959916994e97c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
June 23, 2011
Michael Allegra
General Manager
Utah Transit Authority
669 West 200 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
(801) 819-3128; [email protected]
Neal Gatherum
Lamar Transit Advertising
754 South 200 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
(801) 532-1565; [email protected]
Re: GRAMA Request Relating to the Utah Transit Authority’s Refusal to Permit
the United Coalition of Reason’s Advertisements on UTA’s TRAX Trains
Messrs. Allegra and Gatherum:
I am writing regarding the decision1 (the “Refusal Decision”) of the Utah Transit
Authority (the “Authority”) to refuse to allow the United Coalition of Reason (the “Coalition”) to
run an advertisement2 (the “Coalition Advertisement”) on the Authority’s TRAX light rail trains.
As you know, the Authority is a “political subdivision of the state of Utah.”3 The
Authority has contracted with Lamar Transit Advertising (“LTA”) to act as its agent in handling
the business of advertising on its public transit vehicles. Both the Authority4 and LTA
5 are
1 The Authority refused to enter into a contract with the Coalition, stating in an email from Brandon Bott dated June
16, 2011, that “This ad is not approved as it does not meet UTA’s advertising policy. Consistent with our policy, we
don’t allow message ads from non-governmental organizations.” 2 The proposed advertisement, which was submitted to the Authority, included the text: “Don't believe in God? You
are not alone.” 3 Burke v. Utah Transit Authority, 462 F. 3d 1253 (10
th Cir. 2006). The Authority was created pursuant to Utah
Code Ann. §§17B–2a–801 to –825 (2009). See also Greene v. Utah Transit Authority, 37 P. 3d 1156 (2001)
(explaining that the Authority “is a governmental entity”); Weiser v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 2010, 649 Utah Adv.
Rep. 32, 2010 UT 4, 2010 WL 391863, ¶ 39 (“UTA is a public transit authority created under the power granted by
the Utah Legislature in the Utah Public Transit District Act . . . UTA is a local governmental entity.”) 4 The documents requested herein (see below) are public records under the Records Act, which defines public
records to include a “book, letter, document, paper, map, plan, photograph, film, card, tape, recording, electronic
data, or other documentary material regardless of physical form or characteristics: (i) that is prepared, owned,
![Page 2: FOIA Request Letter re UCoR Ads on UTA Trains](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100601/5571fb73497959916994e97c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
subject to the requirements of the Utah Government Records Access and Management Act
(U.C.A. 1953 §63G-2-201 et seq.) (the “Records Act”).
Pursuant to the Records Act, we hereby request copies (in electronic form6 if available)
of the following documents (the “Requested Documents”), whether currently in the possession of
the Authority, LTA or any other party:
1. All documents relating to the Refusal Decision;
2. All documents relating to the policy or policies (official or unofficial, written or
unwritten) of the Authority and/or LTA regarding the types of advertisements or other
messages accepted or rejected by the Authority (or LTA on its behalf) for display on
or in the Authority’s transit vehicles, stations or other property (such advertisements
hereinafter referred to as “Transit Advertisements”), or any discussion relating to such
policy or policies;
3. Copies or complete descriptions of all Transit Advertisements accepted by the
Authority (or LTA on its behalf) within the last 2 years, including the identity of the
party (i.e. the principal, not advertising broker or agent) purchasing such Transit
Advertisements and the text and images therein;
4. Copies or complete descriptions of all Transit Advertisements rejected by the
Authority (or LTA on its behalf) within the last 2 years, including the identity of the
party (i.e. the principal, not advertising broker or agent) who sought to purchase such
Transit Advertisements and the text and images therein;
5. All communications between or among the Authority, LTA and any other party
relating to the Refusal Decision7 or to any other decision made to refuse to accept any
Transit Advertisements within the last 2 years;
6. All contracts between the Authority and LTA; and
We hereby request that you respond to this request on an expedited basis. 8
Because this
request involves fundamental issues of First Amendment Constitutional rights and therefore of
received, or retained by a governmental entity or political subdivision; and (ii) where all of the information in the
original is reproducible by photocopy or other mechanical or electronic means.” U.C.A. 1953 §63G-2-103(22)(a).
The Records Act defines “governmental entity” to include “any political subdivision of the state.” U.C.A. 1953
§63G-2-103(11)(a). 5 Records that are “normally public” include inter alia “records documenting the services provided by a contractor
or a private provider to the extent the records would be public if prepared by the governmental entity;” and
“contracts entered into by a governmental entity.” U.C.A. 1953 § 63G-2-301 (3)(c) and (d). 6 Section 201 of the Records Act provides that “[e]very person has the right to inspect a public record free of
charge” and that “a governmental entity shall provide access to an electronic copy of a record in lieu of providing
access to its paper equivalent if: (a) the person making the request requests or states a preference for an electronic
copy; (b) the governmental entity currently maintains the record in an electronic format that is reproducible and may
be provided without reformatting or conversion; and (c) the electronic copy of the record: (i) does not disclose other
records that are exempt from disclosure; or (ii) may be segregated to protect private, protected, or controlled
information from disclosure without the undue expenditure of public resources or funds.” 7 Section 301 of the Records Act provides that “correspondence by and with a governmental entity in which the
governmental entity determines or states an opinion upon the rights of . . . any person” is public absent an express
statutory exception, none of which are applicable here. 8 Pursuant to Section 204(3) of the Records Act provides that, given the public interest at issue, you must comply
with this request within “as soon as reasonably possible . . . but no later than 5 business days after receiving this
request.”
![Page 3: FOIA Request Letter re UCoR Ads on UTA Trains](https://reader038.fdocuments.in/reader038/viewer/2022100601/5571fb73497959916994e97c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
the most compelling public interest, this request “benefits the public” pursuant to Section
204(3)(a) of the Records Act and is therefore entitled to an expedited response.
You are required by the Records Act to make immediate delivery by e-mail or postal mail
of copies of all of the Requested Documents pursuant to this request to me at the following
address:
William Burgess
Appignani Humanist Legal Center
American Humanist Association
1777 T Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009
Or via e-mail to [email protected]
Please feel free to contact me9 with any questions you may have in response to this
request.
Sincerely,
/s/ William Burgess
William J. Burgess
Appignani Humanist Legal Center
American Humanist Association
9 As required by Section 204(1)(b) of the Records Act, my daytime telephone number is (202) 238-9088 should you
need to reach me immediately.