Focusing Electrons
5
A FOCUSING (PINCHED) FLOW OF PURE ELECTRONS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE AGAINST THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY OF EINSTEIN. P.T. Pappas a , T.P. Pappas b , L.P. Pappas c . a ppappaspap!"!.c#", b $pappaspap!"!.%&, c 'pappaspap!"!.%&. Abs$&ac$ In this paper, in the following, we show that a 3 of pure electrons can never self-focus, according to Sp Thus, it is contrary to everyday experience, be do focuse . Special Relativity is, thus, falsified 3 . C# '#"b p' s A"p*&* 'a+ +!$- "# !/% c-a&%*s. The !oulomb law is" (0) with ,# $.%&'$& ($) c. The *mpere $ forces between moving charges are +si f $ # l 4 π ε ₀ d $ d r ₁₂ r ₁₂ ³ $/0- 1 & 0 & v .v $ - 3 r ₁₂ ² v .r $ v $ .r $ 22 + , 1 & 0 & #$/ec ,f $ # l 4 π ε ₀ d $ d r ₁₂ r ₁₂ ³ $- v .v $ /c 2 , it changes
-
Upload
john-connor -
Category
Documents
-
view
15 -
download
0
description
A focusing beam of electrons as experimental evidence against special relativity.
Transcript of Focusing Electrons
A FOCUSING (PINCHED) FLOW OF PURE ELECTRONS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE AGAINST THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY OF EINSTEIN. P.T. Pappasa, T.P. Pappasb, L.P. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]:In this paper, in the following, we show that a flow3 of pure electrons can never self-focus, according to Special Relativity. Thus, it is contrary to everyday experience, because such beams do focuse2. Special Relativity is, thus, falsified in practice3.
Coulomb plus Ampere law1 with moving charges.
The Coulomb law is: (7)with ,=1.6021019c. The Ampere1 forces between moving charges are (si units): f12 = dq1dq2 {1/- 00{2v2.v1 - v2.r12v1.r12}} (8), 00=1/ec2 , f12 = dq1dq2{1- 2v2.v1/c2 } , it changes sign when: 1- 2v2.v1/c2 = 0 , v2=v1=v, 2v2.v1=c2, v=c/1,41 = 212.765 Km/s. For side, by side moving of pure electrons3. That is for this velocity; the Ampere force becomes bigger than the Coulomb force. Thu, the side by side pure electrons self-focus according to the Ampere force. In Relativity, the magnetic force has limit the Culomb force, for v=c, that is never reached. In such a case, we should not have self-focusing of moving of pure electrons3.
E=ds=dqv, f=idsxb=dqvxb, f=vxb/c2, f=q(e+vxb)=, side by side at a distance ry, moving vx charges, stationary observer sees, fc/ = fc - magnforce. -magnforce= fc/ - fc, at vx=c, (fc+mf)=f, magnetic force q(cxb)= - f/ + fc - 0 + fcMagnetic force, q(cxb) -0 +fc, vxcdispersive Coulomb force focusing magnetic force as vx c.
SIMPLE SHORT PROOF.From the law of Biot-Savart in S.I units:B=0/4 i dl sin/r2, k=0/4, 00=1/c2, sin=1, B=(0/4)qv/r2 for v=c, b=(0/4)qc/r2, E=(1/40)q/r2 b/e=c00=1/c, then, =c.b, f=qe=qcbTherefore, we should never have self-focusing with the S.R. On the contrary2, see-google self-focusing electron beams. Also, see self-focusing beam vacuum radio tubes.
These all prove the non-Relativistic Ampere forces and disprove the Special Theory Relativity.We have the law of Biot-Savart, in S.I units, k=0/4, 00=1/c2, B=0/4 i dl sin/r2, produced from the flow of electrons, not from coil 4, idl=qv, sin=1:B=(0/4)qv/r2 for v=c, b=(0/4)qc/r2, e=(1/40)q/r2, b/e=c00=1/c, then, =c.b, f=qeqcb, for vc, and vqvb, Qediverging>qvbcoverging.Including the Coulomb law: (7)with , the Ampere forces between moving charges are (si units):f12 = dq1dq2{1/- 00{2v2.v1v2.r12v1.r1, 00=1/ec2, f12 = dq1dq2{1- 2v2.v1/c2 } , the sign changes only, if 1- 2v2.v1/c2 = 0 , v2=v1=v, 2v2.v1=c2, v=c/1,41 = 212.765 Km/s. For v>212.765 km/s, Fc
