Focus-Point studies at LHC
-
Upload
giselle-brown -
Category
Documents
-
view
28 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Focus-Point studies at LHC
Focus-Point studies at LHCFocus-Point studies at LHC
U. De Sanctis, T. LarU. De Sanctis, T. Lari, C. Tronconi, C. TronconUniversity of Milan and INFNUniversity of Milan and INFN
ATLAS CollaborationATLAS Collaboration
SUSYSUSY and and Dark Matter Dark Matter
DM SUSY• Non-baryonic matter density, computed from WMAP measurements:
0.094 < 0.094 < DM DM hh22 < 0.129 (2 < 0.129 (2 conf confidence interval))
For any specFor any specific set of parameters of a SUSY R-parity conserving model, it is
possible to compute the LSP relic density from the mass spectrum and the Big-Bang
cosmology. The relic density can be less than DM (if other contributions to the DM).
The WMAP upper limit is a constrain that defines cosmologically interesting
regions of the SUSY parameter hyperspace. I will limit myself to mSUGRA here. SUSY DMOnce (if) we will have a measurement of SUSY mass spectrum mixing angle etc., one can compute the relic density it corresponds to.
mSUGRA and DMmSUGRA and DM
SUSY spectrum computed with ISAJET 7.69 Relic density computed with Micromegas 1.3.0
Focus Point
Coannihilation(very narrow)
In most of mSUGRA parameter space the predicted relic densityis too large.
In the Focus-Point region(large m0) the lightest neutralino has a significantHiggsino component, and the relic density is reduced by s-channel annihilation in the early universe.
Selected for a detailed study with ATLAS simulation.
Comparison of RGE codes Comparison of RGE codes
m0 scanm1/2 = 300 GeV tan= 10 A0=0 mt=175 GeV
h2
m0 (GeV)3000 4000
Large differences in the predicted relic density using different codesto compute SUSY mass spectrumat the Electro-Weak scale. The study presented here was made using ISAJET 7.69.
SUSY mass spectrumSUSY mass spectrum
102.6102.6
157.4157.4
172.3172.3
290.5290.5
145.4145.4
2282.782.7
gg 854854
qqLL 34163416
tt11 20412041
hh 118. 8118. 8
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Masses (GeV)Mass spectrum at the selected pointM0=3400 GeV m1/2 = 300 GeV tan= 10 A0=0 mt=175 GeV
Squarks at the limit of LHC reach. Other sleptons and heavy Higgs too heavy for LHC.Gluino decays into neutralinos and charginos.
Production xSectionProduction xSection
ProductProduction xSections
4.6 pb4.6 pb
gggg 0.50.588 pb pb
qgqg 3.7 fb3.7 fb
• production most abundant, but little jet and missing energy:difficult to separate from SM. We are investigating the possibility to use ±
1→
l± l+ l-
searching for 3 leptons+missing energy+no jet events.• gluino pair production dominant after standard SUSY cuts.• squarks visible with high luminosity
~~
~~
~~
Standard cuts (not optimized for this point) on jet and missing energy and lepton veto.
10 fb-1 (1st LHC year?)Susy/√SM = 16
Sum of jet and missing transverse energy.using ATLAS fast simulation
Gluino decaysGluino decays
Gluino decays:Gluino decays:
g → g → qq 7.2 %qq 7.2 %
g → g → bb 3.7 %bb 3.7 %
g → g → tt 28.0 %tt 28.0 %
g → g → g 5.9 % g 5.9 %
g → g → qqqq 9.6 % 9.6 %
g → g → tb 45.6 %tb 45.6 %
Golden channel is the neutralino dilepton decay (gives neutralino mass difference).In principle, the leptons from neutralino decays can be combined with jets to get further mass relations.However, large number of jets from gluino decay (heavy combinatory background) and poor lepton statistics to start with.We have concentrated on reconstruction of the two main gluino decays using tt and tb invariant mass distributions (gives difference between gluino and gaugino mass scales)
Neutralino dilepton decays:
→ l l
→
l l
Dilepton mass distributionsDilepton mass distributions
~
~~
~
Cuts: Meff > 750 GeV, ETmiss > 100 GeV,
1 jet with pT > 100 GeV Leptons with pT > 10 GeV
At generator level
→
l+l-
→
l+l-
Mll (GeV)604020
Experimental, flavour subtracted
~
~ ~
300 fb-1
No SM background
Mll (GeV)604020 80
The edge can be measured (constrain
on neutralino mixing matrix from the shape?)The
edge hardly visible even after three years at design luminosity.
ATLAS
ATLAS
Gluino decays to charginoGluino decays to chargino
33 fb-1 no SM backg.
Mtb (GeV)200 400 600
30 fb-1
No SM background
M(g)-M
M(g)-M
Top quark decay into udb or csb fully reconstructed. tb invariant masses reconstructed.
ATLAS
Gluino to neutralinoGluino to neutralino
At generator level Experimental, flavour subtracted
g→ tt
g→ tt
g→ tt
g→ tt
~ ~
~ ~
~~
~~
Mtt (GeV) Mtt (GeV)400 600 800 400 600 800
Invariant mass of two fully reconstructed tops.Analysis cuts similar to the gluino to chargino analysis.With high luminosity an endpoint can be extracted.
300 fb-1
No SM background
ATLAS ATLAS
Scan of parameter spaceScan of parameter space
M0-m1/2 scan for mt=175 GeV,A0=0,tan=10,>0
As one moves up the FP strip the SUSY masses increase and the production cross sections decrease.
FP2FP2 FP3FP3 FP4FP4 FP5FP5
MM00 34003400 42004200 57205720 60006000
MM1/21/2 300300 500500 10001000 10001000
hh22 .059.059 .026.026 .07.0788 .012.012
M(g)M(g) 885454 13341334 24532453 24624688
M(M( 103103 176176 401401 241241
(gg)(gg) 558080 21.321.3 0.050.05 0.050.05
46004600 10741074 5757 448080
gq)gq) 3.73.7 0.20.2 00 00
Cross sections in fb, masses in GeV
FP2FP3
FP4 FP5
Gluino massino mass
Neutralino mass differencesNeutralino mass differences
MM
MM
The is close in mass to
on the right of the band (where << WMAP) while it is close to the
on the left of the band (where WMAP). Almost always m(
)-m() is below the threshold for
→Z0
The dilepton edge would provide a good constrain on
Effect of top massEffect of top mass
As the top mass is increased the FP region moves to larger values of m0. For the same m1/2 the gluino/gaugino masses and decays depend very little on the top mass. Sfermions are within LHC reach only for a light top.
M0 (GeV)
M0 (GeV)
M1/
2 (G
eV)
M1/
2 (G
eV)
2000 5000
2000 5000 2000 4000
500
500 500
100
100 100
Mt = 172 GeV
Mt = 175 GeV
Mt = 178 GeV
Effect of top mass Effect of top mass
At fixed m1/2 = 300 GeV, relation between mtop and m0 for the FP region. tan=10,A0=0,>0
FP6FP6 FP2FP2 FP7FP7 FPFP88
mmtoptop 172172 175175 171788 118383
MM00 19001900 34003400 71307130 3030858500
MM1/21/2 300300 300300 300300 300300
hh22 .066.066 .059.059 .07.0777 .0.0882727
M(g)M(g) 881414 858544 904904 10111011
M(M( 102102 103103 101088 106106
(gg)(gg) 703703 558080 412412 202202
46104610 46004600 36503650 44130130
gq)gq) 110110 3.73.7 00 00
FP8
FP7
FP2
FP6
Effect of tanEffect of tantan=10 tan=54
tan=30A larger value of tanpushes the FP band to lower values of m0
At FP11 abundant squark production!
FP2
FP9
FP11
FP10
ConclusionsConclusions
Part of the Focus-Point region is accessible by the LHC experiments. A testpoint was studied with the ATLAS detector fast simulation. A number of mass constrains can be measured: m(
)-m(), m(g)-m(±) and m(g)-m(0).
A scan of mSUGRA focuspoint space has been performed with ISAJET to study how the SUSY mass spectrum varies and select points for more detailed studies.
The gluino gets heavier as one moves along the band in the m0-m1/2 plane. The LHC reach to observe gluino pair production should be about m1/2 ~ 900 GeV. Gaugino production may be used to extend this reach, assuming it can be isolated from the SM background.
The neutralino spectrum is sensitive to position both along and trasversal to the band.
The squarks are accessible for low top masses and/or high tan this would allow to get m0 (and confirm that sfermions are there…)
The Focus-Point is under active study by the ATLAS collaboration. All results are preliminary and more are coming.
Horizontal line scan (III)Horizontal line scan (III)
Not really any good solutNot really any good solutiion won with ith SOFTSUSYSOFTSUSY
Comparison of RGE codes (2) Comparison of RGE codes (2)
Comparison for pointM0=3400 GeV m1/2 = 300 GeV tan= 10 A0=0 mt=175 GeV
ISAJET 7.69ISAJET 7.69 SOFTSUSY 1.SOFTSUSY 1.8686 SPheno 2.22SPheno 2.22 Suspect 2.3Suspect 2.3
M(M( 102.6102.6 126.9126.9 126.9126.9 127.0127.0
M(M( 157.4157.4 247.7247.7 24248.68.6 247.4247.4
M(M( 172.3172.3 596.4596.4 665.4665.4 5580.880.8
M(g)M(g) 8853.753.7 858.1858.1 8807.707.7 869.0869.0
M(uM(uLL)) 3419 3419 34348181 34313431 34348181
All masses in GeVin GeV
One more tableOne more table
FP12FP12 FP2FP2 FP9FP9 FP10FP10 FPFP1111
mmtoptop 1010 1010 3030 5454 5454
MM00 34003400 34003400 24002400 23002300 14001400
MM1/21/2 300300 300300 300300 300300 118800
-- ++ ++ ++ ++
.061.061 .059.059 .091.091 .052.052 .114.114
M(g)M(g) 854854 885454 829829 825825 517517
M(uM(uLL)) 34163416 34163416 24492449 23562356 14351435
M(tM(t11)) 20412041 20412041 14791479 14271427 860860
M(M( 111111 103103 107107 101077 6688
(gg(gg++gq)gq) 580580 558080 700700 13141314 1667016670
45504550 46104610 46004600 36503650 44130130
Little effect from changing the sign of mh = 114.8 GeV