Fluvial Geomorphology Report Report prepared by JTB … · (as seen in Reach 6 and Reach 2) and...
Transcript of Fluvial Geomorphology Report Report prepared by JTB … · (as seen in Reach 6 and Reach 2) and...
-
Client: City of Ottawa JFSA Ref. No.: 990-12 /June 2015
J.F. Sabourin and Associates Inc. Feasibility Study for a Surface SWM Facility at Baseline Road and Woodroffe Avenue Water Resources and Final Report Environmental Consultants
E Fluvial Geomorphology Report
Report prepared by JTB Environmental Systems Inc
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY
AT BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE:
STEP 1 GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT
OTTAWA, ONTARIO
Submitted by
JTB Environmental Systems Inc.
June, 2015
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 STUDY AREA 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 METHODOLOGY 6 RESULTS 7 DISCUSSION 12 CLOSURE 14 APPENDICES 1 THROUGH 3 following Page 14
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 2
INTRODUCTION JTBES were retained as part of a larger study team to determine the feasibility of a surface stormwater facility at the northeast corner of Baseline Road and Woodroffe Avenue in the west end of Ottawa. This location, which is owned by the National Capital Commission, is part of the Pinecrest Creek system and is positioned at the upstream limit of the daylighted portion of the creek. A geomorphological assessment was required to determine the impacts of such a facility on the functioning of Pinecrest Creek. Further, in an effort to preserve the function of the creek and to ensure that erosion is not exacerbated by stormwater discharge, determination of threshold flows for release of stormwater to the creek have been determined. The purpose of this report is to establish erosion thresholds for stormwater delivery to Pinecrest Creek along Reach 6, and to establish potential locations for discharge which will integrate into the function of the creek with minimal impact or require minimal disturbance to the existing channel and banks. Further, a threshold for flows along a downstream reach where the SW Transitway stormwater discharge connection has been made (2011/2012) has been established. This location is in Reach 3 and is approximately 90 metres upstream of the Iris Street culvert, on a bend where active erosion is occurring.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 3
STUDY AREA The geomorphology study area includes the length of Pinecrest Creek which is daylighted, though more intense assessment is required at the location where the stormwater connection is made to the creek. Figure 1 shows the daylighted portion of Pinecrest Creek; the proposed pond location and connection point are found in Reach 6.
Figure 1: Study Reaches on Pinecrest Creek. The reach which will receive direct stormwater discharge is Reach 6.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 4
EXISTING CONDITIONS Pinecrest Creek flows along the surface from a point upstream of the Baseline Road/Woodroffe Avenue intersection northward until it enters the Ottawa River Parkway culvert, a distance of approximately 4.5 km. Along this length it displays a variety of conditions, some reflecting past realignments/straightening (as seen in Reach 6 and Reach 2) and others reflecting active and significant meandering (as seen in reaches 4 and 5). The creek has adjusted to a long period of surrounding land use change from rural agricultural to urban intensive. Over this time the creek has responded to increased impervious cover by becoming wider to accommodate the increased volumes of flow and in response to a flashier storm hydrograph response. As a consequence of the impact of these changes, the creek has been actively eroding in an attempt to stabilize its path and create equilibrium with storm flow. Erosion along the creek has been extensive in some locations while other locations have remained stable. In 2006/2007 the National Capital Commission had an erosion assessment completed on Pinecrest Creek and the result of that study was the identification of all erosion sites and determination of restoration potential along a number locations. In 2008 six sub‐reaches were rehabilitated to control for erosion and to bring the creek into equilibrium with existing stormwater flows. An additional four sites had restoration designs completed; those have yet to be implemented. One of those restoration designs is for the gabion wall and culvert at the upstream limit of this study area. Characteristics of Reach 6: Reach 6 is a long, straight reach which has, over time, become more entrenched and confined by steep valley walls. Historical aerial photos taken prior to urbanization show the creek to be a small, defined headwater swale with good connection to floodplain areas; this is not the case at present. While there is some connection to a floodplain along the majority of the reach, that floodplain shelf is limited in size to a couple of metres maximum. At the furthest extent of the floodplain there are steep valley walls which confine the creek. With the exception of an eroding bank at the downstream limit of the gabion protection on the east bank, the banks and side slopes appear stable with strong vegetation growth. The banks of the low flow channel at the base are held together by fine, fibrous roots which bind the soil and limit erosion. Side slopes are covered with a variety of vegetation which protects against sheetwash erosion during storms and creates significant roughness during high flow events which decreases erosion potential. The bed of the creek is comprised of a mixture of sediment, some of it fine silts (though not in large quantities), with sands, gravels and cobbles/boulders. Some of the material comprising the bed is remnant rip‐rap material (angular stone), which may have been used in earlier gabion baskets protecting the headwall of the culvert and the east bank and subsequently replaced. Reach 6 terminates with a circular culvert beneath Baseline Road. There is no significant erosion problem at the entrance or exit of this culvert.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 5
Table 1 shows photographs at two locations in Reach 6; the first from the mid‐late 1970’s and the second showing the current condition. Table 1: Photographs showing change along Reach 6 within the last 40 (+/‐) years.
Mid‐Late 1970’s Current Condition
Outlet location at upper limit of daylighted
Pinecrest Creek
Photo Courtesy of J. Mulligan, NCC
View upstream from Baseline
Road
Photo Courtesy of J. Mulligan, NCC
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 6
METHODOLOGY The geomorphic conditions of Pinecrest Creek in the reach where stormwater is to be discharged has been assessed using two principle methods: a field component and a desktop modelling component. The purpose of the field component was to determine the location of sensitive areas along the receiving reach and to establish the optimal location for discharge of stormwater. Further, based on field results (which was compared to conditions during previous studies in 2007, 2010 and 2011 as well as twice‐annual monitoring between 2009 and 2011), sediment analysis and hydraulic analysis the threshold for erosion along the reach were determined. The erosion threshold is input data for the discharge rate of the pond and influences the volumetric calculations relating to pond storage and function. The erosion inventory created as part of the 2007 NCC Study was updated to reflect the completion of monitoring of 2008/09 restoration implementation sites as well as to modify severity/stability/priority classifications of new sites of concern on Reaches 6 and 3. The purpose of the desktop component was to assess conditions in the creek with respect to varying discharges from the pond and to determine channel parameters which are indicative of erosion potential. In this study erosion potential was determined using boundary shear stress calculations (for the bed and bank), permissible velocity distributions for entrainment of sediment within the channel boundary, and stream power/specific stream power calculations. Interpretation of the results of the channel parameter analysis was used to establish the erosion threshold.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 7
RESULTS Erosion Assessment: erosion is occurring along the upper end of the study reach (Reach 6) at the location where the gabion basket wall terminates. Limited to the eastern bank, this erosion extends for a distance of approximately 25 metres. The eastern bank along this section is comprised of bare banks with exposed clay at steep angle; the bank is subject to sheetwash erosion and some slope toe erosion. The steepness of the bank limits vegetation growth. Erosion at this site was characterized as moderate to high severity in the 2007 Pinecrest Creek Fluvial Geomorphology study and is updated to high severity in this study.
The remainder of the reach is stable, with no erosion. The creek is confined in a steep valley; however there is a strong connection with a limited floodplain which is well‐vegetated and stable. The depth of the valley decreases as distance downstream toward Baseline Road increases, though there is no widening of the base of the valley in which the creek flows. Figure 2 is a photo of the eroding bank; Figure3 is a photo of the stable section of the reach.
Figure 2: Eroding east bank downstream of gabion wall. View is upstream.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 8
Figure 3: View along stable section of Reach 6 View is upstream. The reach upstream of Iris Street (Reach 3) is relatively stable. Previous unstable sites were rehabilitated in 2008 by the NCC and continue to function as intended. That said, there is one eroding bank on the west side of the creek (adjacent to the Transitway) approximately 90 metres upstream of Iris Street which has been extending for a number of years. This bank is to the point where it is now classified as high severity and it will require some intervention in the future. This site was used to determine the downstream erosion threshold; though it is recognized that pond function may not be significant at this location due to inputs between the pond and the site. Figure4 is a photo of that eroding bank. The updated erosion database is provided in Appendix 1.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 9
Figure 4: Eroding bank in Reach 3 which represents the sensitive reach for threshold analysis. View is cross‐stream.
Erosion Thresholds: Detailed analysis of creek response to flow was completed for 20 cross‐sections (19 in Reach 6 and one in Reach 3). Results for these sections are found in Appendix 2. Grain size analysis was previously completed and remains representative. Four samples were analyzed for each of the two reaches; summary sheets are found in Appendix 3.
In Reach 6 Station 5140 was determined to be the most sensitive based on analysis of the channel parameters. This reach was used to establish the erosion threshold for pond release.
Erosion sensitivity is based on a number of factors including the ability of the section to pass sediment through the channel. Table 2 shows the discharges required to erode sediment for a range of grain sizes, all of which are found in the reaches. Interpretation of the data indicates the section which should be used for threshold analysis in Reach 6 is Section 5140. In Reach 3 the section used in the threshold analysis is Section 3100.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 10
Table 2: Critical discharges and shear stresses required to entrain sediment ranging between 2mm and 64mm diameter for individual sections. Section numbers refer to the Pinecrest Creek HEC‐Ras results. Critical velocity is expressed in m sec‐1, shear stress is expressed in N m‐2, and discharge values are in m3 sec‐1. A blank cell indicates the critical discharge for that particle size is not reached in the section.
Section
2mm 5mm 10mm 25mm 50mm 64mmQv
0.270 Qτ
1.460 Qv
0.410 Qτ
3.640Qv
0.570Qτ
7.280Qv
0.870Qτ
18.21Qv1.20
Qτ 36.42
Qv1.34
Qτ 46.62
Reach 65200 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.04 0.56 0.19 2.34 2.13 7.88 11.24 11.24 19.155190 1.99 1.32 11.01 7.67 31.39 5180 0.30 0.17 1.81 1.20 5.32 7.12 21.91 44.34 5150 0.16 0.14 0.56 0.62 1.97 2.13 10.00 10.84 37.41 5140 0.05 0.01 0.24 0.10 0.73 0.53 3.78 4.19 13.77 17.39 26.495130 0.20 0.13 0.69 0.84 1.99 3.10 10.10 16.81 5120 0.18 0.04 0.83 0.49 3.29 2.10 13.74 5110 0.32 0.12 0.99 1.18 3.40 4.15 22.09 5100 0.40 0.33 1.58 2.20 7.47 7.89 5090 0.63 0.48 2.62 3.10 13.99 11.46 5080 0.55 0.63 3.96 3.36 13.37 5070 0.51 0.59 9.25 2.71 13.63 5060 0.53 0.65 12.77 2.68 5050 0.48 0.62 3.25 3.37 15.20 5040 1.58 1.21 7.15 5030 0.85 0.80 4.67 5020 6.49 0.98 8.61 5010 9.14 6.52 5000 0.05 0.03 0.22 0.17 0.78 0.65 17.87 3.62 23.79 42.87
Reach 33100 0.15 0.02 0.49 0.15 1.21 0.94 4.18 5.99 13.57
Erosion thresholds are based on a given fraction of the bed material particle size distribution, which is determined through bulk sediment analysis. Four bed samples were collected and analyzed for each reach as part of the Pinecrest/Centrepointe Stormwater Management Criteria Study (2011). Table 3 shows summary results for the D10, D50 and D90 fractions for each sample, as well as the critical velocity and critical shear stress required to entrain that particle.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 11
Table 3: Bed sample grain size characteristics for four samples in each Reach. Sample diameter is in mm, critical velocity (Vcrit) is in m sec‐1, and critical shear stress (Ƭcrit) is in N m
‐2. Reach 6 Reach 3
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 9 Sample 10 Sample 11 Sample 12D10 Vcrit Ƭcrit
0.895
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 12
DISCUSSION Translation of Erosion Threshold to Reach 5 and beyond: There are reaches downstream of the Reach 6 boundary which are sensitive to erosion and would normally be the dictate of erosion thresholds under natural conditions. The reason those reaches were not considered is related to the existing storm network: at the upper end of Reach 5 the Woodroffe Trunk Sewer enters Pinecrest Creek and this connection, which provides uncontrolled stormflow volumes, reaches the creek faster than flows from the proposed pond would. As a consequence, pond outflow entering Reach 5 will be buffered by the trunk sewer flow. Removal of 60% (minimum) TSS: removal of suspended solids from a system that relies on sediment transport as part of its erosion maintenance regime could result in additional erosion as the system tries to pick up a volume of sediment from bed and bank sources to replace that volume lost to the pond. Under most conditions this would create a significant issue for the creek; however because the proposed pond location is at the upstream end of the system the risk to additional erosion is limited. The reason for this is the current suspended load is artificially derived through runoff in the storm network, consisting of sands and finer sediments that wash off impervious surfaces. This makes the sediment loading artificially high when compared to natural sources. That said, loss of this volume (artificial as it is) will result in a need for the creek to acquire additional sediment. There are multiple opportunities for the creek to acquire sediment along the length of Pinecrest Creek and, at the upstream limit of Reach 5, the Woodroffe Trunk sewer will continue to add sediment to the system. Given these conditions, it is not anticipated that additional erosion will result from the implementation of the proposed pond and the removal of 60%+ of TSS. There is an opportunity in the design of the stormwater connection to the creek for additional sediment sourcing. This is being investigated as part of the Implementation Plan for this study. Stormwater Outlet Connection to Pinecrest Creek: the location of the connection to Pinecrest Creek is critical to the proper integration of threshold flows. As indicated above, the first 25m downstream of the gabion baskets would not be a wise choice for discharging stormwater as the area is continually undergoing change and bank retreat (although at a gentle rate). Disturbance of this area would further destabilize the bank and could result in additional erosion problems. Compounding the issue is the potential for loss of length if the connection is made close to Baseline Road. While that section is the most stable along the Reach, discharging stormwater that far downstream would result in a loss of active channel length. As a consequence of this fact, the optimal location would be either as close to the current culvert location upstream, or at another location with additional channel creation to meet the existing length of Reach 6. One possible solution would be to divert a baseflow amount to the existing upstream limit of the creek, allowing that to flow downstream and meet the stormwater flow connection point. Constraints: A significant constraint to the design is the connection channel. It is preferred to have the connection channel between the pond and Pinecrest Creek an open watercourse feature, however the location of the connection will have an impact on the overall footprint of the pond. Considering a preliminary connection channel configuration to carry the threshold discharge (1.5m bottom width,
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 13
depth 0.33m, top width 2.17m and gradient 0.002m/m), with an appropriate floodplain of 2m on each side of the channel, the minimum width required would be 6.17m. From the floodplain elevation to the top of ground elevation we would require side slopes of 3:1 for safety reasons; this means that for every metre the floodplain is below the elevation of the surrounding ground (top of slope), an additional 6 metres is required in corridor width. If the connection is made close to the existing creek outlet, a corridor with a potential top width of 33.5m would be required; if the connection were made lower down the system near Baseline Road, a corridor with a potential top width of approximately 18.2m is needed. Connection at a point approximately half way along the reach would require a corridor with a potential top width of approximately 28 metres. These corridor widths are preliminary and are subject to revision once the final elevations are established. Moving forward: the next step in the analysis is to apply the thresholds to storm outflow and determine, using exceedence analysis, the relationship between existing flows and flows from the proposed pond. A change in exceedence will result in an impact to the creek, the magnitude of that change will be assessed as part of Phase 2 of this study.
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
JTB Environmental Systems Inc Page 14
CLOSURE This report provides for the erosion threshold discharges for the proposed stormwater pond at the northeast corner of Baseline Road and Woodroffe Avenue in the west end of Ottawa. Based on existing creek conditions, flow hydraulics, changes in channel parameters with increasing stage, grain size characteristics of the bed material and the structure of the banks, a stormwater release rate of a maximum of 0.310 m3 sec‐1 is the threshold release rate. For the downstream reach (Reach 3), as requested by JFSA, the threshold discharge is 0.460 m3 sec‐1, based on the nature of the bed and banks and considering the existing and worsening erosion problem upstream of Iris Street. Respectfully Submitted,
Dr. J. Beebe JTBES CAMBRIDGE, ON Following: Appendix 1 Updated Erosion Database Appendix 2 Section Results Appendix 3 Grain Size Results
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
APPENDIX 1
EROSION DATABASE
-
Rea
ch 1
: Pin
ecre
st D
rain
to
Qu
een
sway
Rea
ch:
Stat
ion
Eas
tin
gN
orth
ing
Fac
tor
Ele
vati
onSe
veri
tySt
abili
tyP
rior
ity
Cla
ssO
bse
rvat
ion
1+00
036
1026
5024
878
Hum
an63
.6D
owns
tream
lim
it of
Stu
dy A
rea,
note
regr
adin
g on
righ
t ban
k1+
015
3610
2950
2486
3H
uman
55.4
Conc
rete
form
on
right
ban
k1+
020
3610
3050
2485
8N
atur
al54
.9Lo
n g, s
traig
ht e
ntre
nche
d ch
anne
l with
hig
h (1
.5m
) ver
tical
bank
s.1+
045
3610
4050
2483
5H
uman
64.8
Conc
rete
on
left b
ank;
und
ercu
tting
on
right
ban
k; n
ote
expo
sed
root
s1+
057
3610
4450
2482
4H
uman
68.4
2150
mm
stor
m d
rain
on
right
ban
k; n
ote
scou
r on
upst
ream
win
gwall
1+07
036
1049
5024
812
Nat
ural
67.4
View
ups
tream
of s
torm
dra
in1+
092
3610
5750
2479
2N
atur
al78
.2Fl
ood
debr
is on
left
bank
; ban
k is
1.6m
hig
h; c
hann
el is
terr
aced
her
e1+
118
3610
7350
2477
1Re
dire
ctio
n70
.8E
rosio
n sc
ar o
n rig
ht b
ank;
not
sign
ifica
nt; c
ause
is tr
ee b
lock
ing
flow
; cha
nnel
tryin
g to
initi
ate
mea
nder
ing
1+13
836
1087
5024
757
Redi
rect
ion
59T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s1+
175
3611
1750
2473
2Re
dire
ctio
n71
.3T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s1+
200
3611
3350
2471
7N
atur
al70
.8M
id-c
hann
el ba
r/rif
fle st
ruct
ure
dive
rting
flow
to b
oth
sides
; som
e un
derc
uttin
g as
a re
sult;
littl
e flo
w th
roug
h ba
r/rif
fle a
t low
flow
/g
;g
;g
/1+
235
3611
5650
2469
8N
atur
al65
.3Lo
ng ru
n w
ith fi
ne se
dim
ent b
ed; v
ery
slow
velo
city;
depo
sitio
nal e
nviro
nmen
t1+
255
3611
7150
2468
5N
atur
al69
.3V
iew u
pstre
am to
war
d fir
st re
al be
nd in
cre
ek; b
anks
hav
e be
tter s
lope
(not
ver
tical)
; gra
vel p
oint
bar
pre
sent
1+29
536
1211
5024
667
Nat
ural
71.3
View
ups
tream
of r
iffle-
pool
sequ
ence
; nat
ural
scou
r on
bank
s; ov
erba
nk st
orag
e po
tent
ial is
hig
h he
re1+
340
3612
5650
2466
4Re
dire
ctio
n66
.7E
rosio
n sc
ar o
n rig
ht b
ank;
cut
ting
fast
er th
an d
owns
tream
scar
; ste
ep ri
ffle
pres
ent h
ere;
right
ban
k up
stre
am h
as tr
ees b
lock
ing
flow
1+34
236
1261
5024
664
Hum
an67
.4O
ld c
oncr
ete
'weir
' in
cent
re o
f cha
nnel;
ups
tream
a la
rge
cobb
le ba
r with
imbr
icatio
n; c
obbl
es p
rese
nt in
ban
k m
ater
ial b
ut n
ot to
this
exte
nt1+
352
3612
7050
2466
5N
atur
al74
.1St
orm
inlet
cha
nnel
left b
ank;
dra
ins t
rans
itway
; ent
ers a
t 90
degr
ee a
ngle
1+38
536
1300
5024
677
Redi
rect
ion
67.2
Bedr
ock
outc
rop
(lim
esto
ne) b
oth
bank
s; w
idth
is c
onst
ricte
d; fa
ster
velo
cities
; sco
ur a
t tre
e in
phot
o ca
used
by
flow
exp
ansio
n1+
412
3613
2450
2468
7N
atur
al66
.9T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s1+
420
3613
3150
2469
1N
atur
al69
.3T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s1+
425
3613
3450
2469
5N
atur
al63
.3Im
brica
ted
cobb
les o
n gr
avel
bar
1+46
036
1362
5024
713
Nat
ural
65W
ide
reac
h ~
12m
; bed
rock
bed
so n
o do
wnc
uttin
g; la
tera
l ero
sion
is do
min
ant p
roce
ss; u
nifo
rm m
orph
olog
y1+
492
3613
9350
2471
4H
uman
67.7
Inlet
on
left b
ank
conn
ecte
d to
arc
hed
culv
ert;
1m w
ide
by 3
m d
eep
1+50
036
1400
5024
712
Redi
rect
ion
64.5
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
1+55
036
1448
5024
715
Nat
ural
64.3
Chan
nel n
arro
ws w
here
ripa
rian
vege
tatio
n re
-est
ablis
hes;
som
e na
tura
l ero
sion
here
1+57
036
1467
5024
710
Redi
rect
ion
75.1
Larg
e gr
avel
bar r
ight
ban
k; fl
ow re
dire
cted
left
bank
; ero
sion
on le
ft ba
nk is
sign
ifica
nt; b
ank
com
prise
d of
var
ved
clay
gg
g;
;g
;p
y1+
615
3615
0150
2470
2N
atur
al74
.6Tr
ansv
erse
bed
rock
shelf
redi
rect
s flo
w to
righ
t ban
k; e
rosio
n sc
ar p
rote
cted
by
trees
in p
laces
1+66
436
1547
5024
678
Redi
rect
ion
79.2
Righ
t ban
k sc
our t
owar
ds p
ath,
fille
d w
ith b
ranc
hes f
or p
rote
ctio
n (?
); lat
eral
eros
ion
dom
inan
t pro
cess
due
to b
edro
ck1+
700
3615
7350
2465
3H
uman
72.5
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
1+72
536
1591
5024
635
Nat
ural
76.3
View
ups
tream
of P
edes
trian
Brid
ge; c
hann
el sh
iftin
g to
righ
t ban
k (s
outh
)1+
747
3616
1250
2461
9N
atur
al75
.8D
ry c
hann
el en
terin
g lef
t ban
k; la
rge
chan
nel w
ith e
vide
nce
of re
cent
flow
s1+
780
3616
3650
2460
8N
atur
al83
Bedr
ock
cont
rolle
d ru
n; h
igh
erod
ing
bank
s on
right
; flo
odpl
ain a
cces
s to
flow
on
left
1+80
636
1661
5024
602
Nat
ural
79.9
Righ
t ban
k cu
tting
--nea
r ver
tical;
exp
osed
tree
s nee
d to
be
rem
oved
; lac
k of
ripa
rian
vege
tatio
n on
righ
t ban
k1+
841
3616
9550
2460
2H
uman
79.2
View
tow
ard
Que
ensw
ay C
ulve
rt; h
igh
bank
s bot
h sid
es; c
oncr
ete
debr
is in
cha
nnel
1+86
036
1714
5024
604
Hum
an84
View
into
Que
ensw
ay C
ulve
rt; n
ote
sedi
men
t acc
umul
atio
n at
exi
t to
culv
ert
"Lef
t" o
r "Ri
ght"
ban
k re
fers
to th
e ba
nk w
hen
facin
g th
e up
stre
am d
irect
ion
Seve
rity
:N
ot se
vere
, litt
le or
no
inte
rven
tion
Mod
erat
e, re
quire
s int
erve
ntio
nSe
vere
, req
uire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nSt
abili
ty:
Stab
le, n
o im
med
iate
conc
erns
Mod
erat
ely st
able,
will
bec
ome
unst
able
in sh
ort t
ime
Uns
tabl
e, re
quire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nP
rior
ity
Cla
ss:
Low
Prio
rity
Med
ium
Prio
rity
Hig
h Pr
iorit
yy
yy
gy
-
Rea
ch 2
: Qu
een
sway
to
Iris
Str
eet
Rea
ch:
Stat
ion
Eas
tin
gN
orth
ing
Fac
tor
Ele
vati
onSe
veri
tySt
abili
tyP
rior
ity
Cla
ssO
bse
rvat
ion
2+00
036
1818
5024
553
Nat
ural
74.9
Ups
tream
view
from
top
of Q
ueen
sway
Cul
vert;
goo
d rip
arian
cov
er; b
anks
in g
ood
shap
e bo
th si
des
2+04
536
1836
5024
507
Nat
ural
76.3
Ups
tream
view
show
ing
riffle
/poo
l seq
uenc
e on
long
stra
ight
reac
h2+
074
3618
4350
2449
0N
atur
al80
.4U
pstre
am v
iew sh
owin
g st
raig
ht re
ach;
no
eros
ion
issue
s her
e2+
105
3618
6050
2445
2N
atur
al80
.4U
pstre
am v
iew sh
owin
g st
raig
ht re
ach;
no
eros
ion
issue
s her
e2+
145
3618
7250
2441
9N
atur
al81
.1U
pstre
am v
iew sh
owin
g st
raig
ht re
ach;
no
eros
ion
issue
s her
e2+
180
3618
8450
2438
7N
atur
al73
.4E
nd o
f lon
g, st
raig
ht re
ach;
cre
ek m
eand
ers s
light
ly to
the
north
2+22
036
1904
5024
352
Nat
ural
79U
pstre
am v
iew o
f stra
ight
reac
h; n
o er
osio
n iss
ues h
ere
2+26
236
1932
5024
352
Nat
ural
81.6
View
of d
owns
tream
side
tow
ard
Iris
Stre
et C
ulve
rt;
2+27
536
1944
5024
321
Hum
an83
View
of I
ris S
treet
Cul
vert;
righ
t cell
par
tially
blo
cked
with
sedi
men
t; de
posit
ion
zone
at e
nd o
f cul
vert
Rea
ch 3
: Iri
s St
reet
To
Tra
nsi
tway
Cro
ssin
g R
each
:St
atio
nE
asti
ng
Nor
thin
gF
acto
rE
leva
tion
Seve
rity
Stab
ility
Pri
orit
y C
lass
Ob
serv
atio
n3+
000
3620
4850
2424
2N
atur
al88
.3U
pstre
am si
de o
f Iris
Stre
et C
ulve
rt; ri
ght c
ell n
ot b
eing
acce
ssed
by
flow
; main
flow
is in
left
cell
3+03
036
2070
5024
227
Nat
ural
78.2
Vie
w o
f b
ed in
th
is r
each
, wh
ich
is n
ow c
omp
rise
d o
f sc
ulp
ted
cla
y an
d t
ran
spor
ted
cob
ble
s3+
048
3620
7950
2421
1N
atur
al79
.9U
pst
ream
vie
w t
owar
d b
end
; ban
ks v
erti
cal b
ut
no
dir
ect
eros
ion
con
cern
; fir
st r
eall
good
poo
l in
th
e sy
stem
3+06
036
2090
5024
312
Nat
ural
77.3
Vie
w f
rom
up
stre
am s
ide
of b
end
; not
e d
evel
opm
ent
of r
iffl
e/p
ool/
run
seq
uen
ce; r
iffl
es ~
3 m
lon
g, r
un
s ~
12 m
lon
g3+
072
3620
9950
2420
1H
uman
81.1
Vie
w o
f st
akes
on
left
ban
k in
dic
atin
g p
rior
sta
bili
zati
on a
ttem
pt,
like
ly b
ioen
gin
eeri
ng
bu
t n
o d
irec
t ev
iden
ce3+
096
3621
0550
2417
9N
atur
al79
.9V
iew in
ups
tream
dire
ctio
n; n
o er
osio
n co
ncer
n he
re; b
anks
and
bed
app
ear s
tabl
e3+
127
3621
2850
2416
7H
uman
81.6
View
of e
rosio
n pr
otec
tion
stak
es o
n lef
t ban
k; a
rea
is do
wns
tream
of g
abio
n ba
sket
s on
left b
ank
3+14
336
2135
5024
154
Hum
an75
.6V
iews o
f gab
ion
bask
ets o
n lef
t ban
k; b
aske
ts a
ppea
r in
good
shap
e; sm
all sa
nd d
epos
it on
ape
x of
out
side
bank
(unu
sual)
; filt
er fa
bric
expo
sed
on b
ed3+
158
3621
3450
2413
9H
uman
84.5
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
3+17
236
2133
5024
125
Redi
rect
ion
88.6
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
3+18
536
2131
5024
113
Nat
ural
79.4
Dow
nstre
am si
de o
f lon
g be
nd; b
anks
not
as h
igh
on b
oth
sides
; rip
arian
cov
er is
ver
y th
in; u
pstre
am li
mit
of c
lay b
ed se
ctio
n3+
210
3621
3350
2408
8N
atur
al76
.6U
pstre
am si
de o
f lon
g be
nd; s
light
und
ercu
tting
on
right
ban
k; n
ot e
xces
sive;
relat
ively
wid
er h
ere
than
dow
nstre
am3+
247
3621
5450
2405
7N
atur
al85
.2U
pstre
am e
nd o
f lon
g ru
n; m
orph
olog
ically
mor
e di
vers
e th
an d
owns
tream
; bed
has
sand
s and
gra
vels
(san
d fr
om w
inte
r roa
d tre
atm
ent (
?))
pg
;p
gy
;g
((
))3+
284
3621
7850
2402
9H
uman
83.8
Small
diam
eter
con
cret
e pi
pe o
n lef
t ban
k; c
obbl
e rif
fle; b
anks
app
ear s
tabl
e3+
300
3621
8850
2401
7N
atur
al70
.8V
iew u
pstre
am o
f cha
nnel;
no
real
eros
ion
conc
erns
her
e3+
323
3622
0450
2400
0N
atur
al78
.2Tr
ansv
erse
cob
ble
riffle
; litt
le rip
arian
cov
er; b
ank
gras
ses h
oldi
ng b
ack
eros
ion
3+34
436
2219
5023
985
Hum
an80
.660
0mm
CSP
on
right
ban
k en
ters
at 4
5 de
gree
ang
le; c
obbl
e ba
r ups
tream
of i
nput
; no
eros
ion
conc
ern
here
3+40
336
2259
5023
943
Hum
an73
.9Cu
lver
t at T
rans
itway
Cro
ssin
g; le
ft sid
e ve
ry la
rge
bar b
lock
ing
flow
; ero
sion
risk
left b
ank
at la
rge
bar
3+40
636
2260
5023
939
Hum
an76
.1V
iew th
roug
h Tr
ansit
way
Cro
ssin
g cu
lver
t
"Lef
t" o
r "Ri
ght"
ban
k re
fers
to th
e ba
nk w
hen
facin
g th
e up
stre
am d
irect
ion
Seve
rity
:N
ot se
vere
, litt
le or
no
inte
rven
tion
Mod
erat
e, re
quire
s int
erve
ntio
nSe
vere
, req
uire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nSt
abili
ty:
Stab
le, n
o im
med
iate
conc
erns
Mod
erat
ely st
able,
will
bec
ome
unst
able
in sh
ort t
ime
Uns
tabl
e, re
quire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nP
rior
ity
Cla
ss:
Low
Prio
rity
Med
ium
Prio
rity
Hig
h Pr
iorit
y
-
Rea
ch 4
: Tra
nsi
tway
Cu
lver
t to
Tra
nsi
tway
Cu
lver
tSt
atio
nE
asti
ng
Nor
thin
gF
acto
rE
leva
tion
Seve
rity
Stab
ility
Pri
orit
y C
lass
Ob
serv
atio
n4+
000
3622
5950
2390
2H
uman
89.5
Ups
tream
view
from
Tra
nsitw
ay C
ross
ing
culv
ert;
left c
ell is
blo
cked
by
bank
4+03
136
2262
5023
872
Nat
ural
76.1
Star
t of t
ight
cou
ple
of b
ends
4+04
236
2272
5023
869
Hum
an79
.4T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s4+
049
3622
7850
2386
6H
uman
77.8
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+05
936
2279
5023
858
Hum
an80
.4U
pstre
am v
iew fr
om a
pex
of ti
ght m
eand
er to
nex
t mea
nder
; sho
rt rif
fle4+
080
3622
8450
2384
3H
uman
87.8
Ups
tream
end
of g
abio
ns; s
ome
bank
retre
at a
t int
erfa
ce w
ith n
atur
al ba
nk; p
oten
tial f
utur
e er
osio
n pr
oblem
4+09
036
2293
5023
846
Nat
ural
74.4
Ups
tream
of t
ight
mea
nder
s; rip
arian
cov
er o
n lef
t is p
oor;
pool
is w
arm
ing
due
to e
xpos
ure;
bed
is cla
y w
ith a
lgae
4+10
536
2306
5023
838
Nat
ural
79.7
Shor
t gra
de c
ontro
l riff
le be
twee
n tw
o m
eand
ers;
wid
th n
arro
w (0
.7%
ups
tream
wid
th);
eros
ion
not a
n iss
ue h
ere
4+13
436
2305
5023
819
Redi
rect
ion
91.2
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+14
236
2298
5023
816
Redi
rect
ion
85.2
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+15
536
2294
5023
804
Redi
rect
ion
84.5
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+16
636
2303
5023
799
Redi
rect
ion
83.3
Ups
tream
end
of g
abio
n led
ge; c
reek
ver
y na
rrow
her
e; en
trenc
hed;
ban
ks >
1.30
m h
igh;
sand
dep
osits
on
left f
lood
plain
indi
cate
s flo
w g
ets o
verb
ank
4+17
736
2313
5023
797
Nat
ural
82.6
Ups
tream
end
of n
arro
w st
retc
h; w
idth
incr
ease
s +30
0%; o
verlo
ose
sand
bed
with
som
e co
bbles
p;
;4+
199
3623
3250
2378
6N
atur
al81
.4U
pstre
am v
iew o
f cha
nnel;
som
e lo
caliz
ed e
rosio
n w
hich
is n
ot o
f con
cern
at t
his t
ime
4+22
936
2361
5023
775
Hum
an79
.730
0mm
con
cret
e pi
pe o
n rig
ht b
ank;
per
ched
110
mm
abo
ve b
ed; e
nter
s per
pend
icular
to c
hann
el; u
pstre
am v
iew to
cul
vert
4+25
036
2381
5023
773
Hum
an91
.9Tr
ansit
way
Cul
vert;
left
cell
bloc
ked;
righ
t cell
clea
r; lef
t cell
fille
d w
ith sa
nd
Rea
ch 5
: Tra
nsi
tway
Cu
lver
t to
Woo
dro
ffe
Cu
lver
tSt
atio
nE
asti
ng
Nor
thin
gF
acto
rE
leva
tion
Seve
rity
Stab
ility
Pri
orit
y C
lass
Ob
serv
atio
n4+
275
3624
0550
2377
8H
uman
95.5
Ups
tream
view
from
Tra
nsitw
ay C
ulve
rt; in
let o
n rig
ht si
de w
ingw
all; l
eft c
ell is
com
plet
ely b
lock
ed b
y ba
nk4+
295
3624
1750
2379
2Re
dire
ctio
n86
.9T
his
sit
e w
as r
ehab
ilita
ted
in 2
008
and
has
com
ple
ted
th
e m
and
ator
y m
onit
orin
g p
erio
d w
ith
su
cces
s4+
313
3624
2350
2380
8N
atur
al80
.2V
iew fr
om a
pex
of lo
ng b
end
upst
ream
of s
ever
e ba
nk e
rosio
n; b
ed is
clay
her
e; so
me
loca
lized
ero
sion
not s
igni
fican
t4+
335
3624
4250
2380
5H
uman
91.7
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+34
636
2450
5023
798
Hum
an90
Th
is s
ite
was
reh
abili
tate
d in
200
8 an
d h
as c
omp
lete
d t
he
man
dat
ory
mon
itor
ing
per
iod
wit
h s
ucc
ess
4+35
536
2459
5023
797
Nat
ural
86.9
View
at u
pstre
am e
nd o
f gab
ions
; sta
ble
riffle
4+37
336
2475
5023
804
Hum
an78
.5U
pstre
am v
iew to
Woo
drof
fe C
ulve
rt4+
390
3624
7250
2381
1N
atur
al84
.2U
pstre
am v
iew to
seco
nd W
oodr
offe
Cul
vert;
tigh
t mea
nder
; san
d is
pres
ent o
n th
e po
int b
ar4+
405
3624
6650
2382
2H
uman
85.4
Rock
rip-
rap
on le
ft ba
nk a
long
tigh
t mea
nder
pp
gg
4+42
036
2478
5023
829
Hum
an79
.2U
pstre
am v
iew to
Woo
drof
fe C
ulve
rt; v
ery
loos
e m
ater
ial o
n be
d; v
ery
slow
flow
; no
evid
ence
of e
rosio
n4+
434
3624
9150
2383
3H
uman
79D
owns
tream
side
of W
oodr
offe
Cul
vert;
ver
y un
stab
le be
d of
silts
and
oth
er fi
nes
Rea
ch 6
: Woo
dro
ffe
Cu
lver
t to
Bas
elin
e C
ulv
ert
Stat
ion
Eas
tin
gN
orth
ing
Fac
tor
Ele
vati
onSe
veri
tySt
abili
tyP
rior
ity
Cla
ssO
bse
rvat
ion
5+00
036
2555
5023
853
Hum
an79
.4U
pstre
am v
iew fr
om W
oodr
offe
Cul
vert;
ver
y lit
tle fl
ow; b
ed o
f CSP
is p
erch
ed 0
.20m
; no
eros
ion
issue
s5+
008
3625
5950
2386
0N
atur
al97
Ups
tream
view
of l
ong,
stra
ight
ent
renc
hed
reac
h; e
vide
nce
of m
obile
sand
and
gra
vel b
ed; r
ipar
ian c
over
wea
k on
left
bank
5+02
336
2571
5023
870
Nat
ural
77U
pstre
am v
iew; c
hann
el is
mor
e en
trenc
hed
5+05
336
2593
5023
889
Hum
an81
.6Re
tain
ing
wall
on
right
ban
k5+
070
3626
0850
2389
7N
atur
al78
.7U
pstre
am v
iew; e
rosio
n ev
iden
t on
left b
ank;
cha
nnel
is les
s ent
renc
hed
5+08
336
2620
5023
902
Nat
ural
79U
pstre
am v
iew sh
owin
g lo
wer
ban
ks a
nd w
ider
vall
ey sy
stem
5+12
636
2661
5023
914
Redi
rect
ion
79.7
Ext
ensi
ve b
ank
eros
ion
on
left
sta
rtin
g at
en
d o
f ga
bio
n b
aske
ts; l
eft
ban
k n
ear
vert
ical
; rig
ht
ban
k is
sta
ble
5+16
636
2695
5023
934
Hum
an75
.6D
own
stre
am e
nd
of
Bas
elin
e ga
bio
n o
n le
ft b
ank
5+18
836
2713
5023
939
Hum
an82
.1U
pst
ream
vie
w t
owar
d B
asel
ine
Cu
lver
t; n
ote
inap
pro
pri
ate
angl
e of
cu
lver
t/cr
eek
con
nec
tion
5+20
236
2727
5023
937
Hum
an85
.2V
iew o
f Bas
eline
Cul
vert;
not
e lef
t ban
k ex
tend
s int
o flo
w;
"Lef
t" o
r "Ri
ght"
ban
k re
fers
to th
e ba
nk w
hen
facin
g th
e up
stre
am d
irect
ion
Seve
rity
:N
ot se
vere
, litt
le or
no
inte
rven
tion
Mod
erat
e, re
quire
s int
erve
ntio
nSe
vere
, req
uire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nSt
abili
ty:
Stab
le, n
o im
med
iate
conc
erns
Mod
erat
ely st
able,
will
bec
ome
unst
able
in sh
ort t
ime
Uns
tabl
e, re
quire
s im
med
iate
atte
ntio
nP
rior
ity
Cla
ss:
Low
Prio
rity
Med
ium
Prio
rity
Hig
h Pr
iorit
y
-
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SURFACE SWM FACILITY, BASELINE ROAD AND WOODROFFE AVENUE: GEOMORPHOLOGY REPORT STEP 1 June 23, 2015
APPENDIX 2
SECTION RESULTS
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
74.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
74.01
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.01
0.18
0.11
0.19
0.00
0.00
74.02
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.63
0.63
0.02
0.35
0.22
0.39
0.00
0.00
74.03
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.91
0.90
0.03
0.53
0.33
0.58
0.00
0.00
74.04
0.00
0.09
0.03
1.18
1.18
0.04
0.71
0.44
0.78
0.00
0.00
74.05
0.00
0.11
0.04
1.45
1.45
0.05
0.88
0.55
0.97
0.00
0.00
74.06
0.01
0.12
0.05
1.73
1.72
0.06
1.06
0.66
1.17
0.18
0.10
74.07
0.01
0.13
0.07
2.00
2.00
0.07
1.24
0.77
1.36
0.18
0.09
74.08
0.01
0.15
0.09
2.28
2.27
0.08
1.41
0.88
1.56
0.18
0.08
74.09
0.02
0.16
0.12
2.55
2.54
0.09
1.59
0.99
1.75
0.35
0.14
74.10
0.02
0.17
0.15
2.83
2.82
0.10
1.77
1.10
1.94
0.35
0.13
74.11
0.03
0.18
0.17
3.10
3.09
0.11
1.94
1.21
2.14
0.53
0.17
74.12
0.04
0.19
0.21
3.35
3.34
0.12
2.12
1.32
2.33
0.71
0.21
74.13
0.05
0.20
0.24
3.61
3.60
0.13
2.30
1.44
2.53
0.88
0.25
74.14
0.06
0.21
0.28
3.87
3.86
0.14
2.47
1.55
2.72
1.06
0.27
74.15
0.07
0.22
0.32
4.14
4.13
0.15
2.65
1.66
2.92
1.24
0.30
74.16
0.08
0.23
0.36
4.41
4.39
0.16
2.83
1.77
3.11
1.41
0.32
74.17
0.10
0.24
0.41
4.67
4.66
0.17
3.01
1.88
3.31
1.77
0.38
74.18
0.11
0.25
0.45
4.94
4.92
0.18
3.18
1.99
3.50
1.94
0.40
74.19
0.13
0.26
0.51
5.20
5.19
0.19
3.36
2.10
3.69
2.30
0.44
74.20
0.15
0.27
0.56
5.47
5.45
0.20
3.54
2.22
3.89
2.65
0.49
74.21
0.17
0.28
0.61
5.64
5.62
0.21
3.71
2.33
4.08
3.01
0.53
74.22
0.20
0.29
0.67
5.70
5.67
0.22
3.89
2.46
4.28
3.54
0.62
74.23
0.22
0.31
0.73
5.73
5.70
0.23
4.07
2.59
4.47
3.89
0.68
74.24
0.25
0.32
0.78
5.76
5.73
0.24
4.24
2.72
4.67
4.42
0.77
74.25
0.28
0.34
0.84
5.80
5.75
0.25
4.42
2.86
4.86
4.95
0.86
74.26
0.31
0.35
0.90
5.83
5.78
0.26
4.60
2.99
5.06
5.48
0.95
74.27
0.35
0.36
0.96
5.87
5.81
0.27
4.77
3.12
5.25
6.19
1.06
74.28
0.38
0.38
1.02
5.90
5.83
0.28
4.95
3.26
5.44
6.72
1.15
74.29
0.42
0.39
1.07
5.93
5.86
0.29
5.13
3.39
5.64
7.42
1.27
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
74.30
0.46
0.40
1.13
5.97
5.89
0.30
5.30
3.53
5.83
8.13
1.38
74.31
0.49
0.41
1.19
6.00
5.92
0.31
5.48
3.66
6.03
8.66
1.46
74.32
0.53
0.43
1.25
6.03
5.94
0.32
5.66
3.80
6.22
9.37
1.58
74.33
0.57
0.44
1.31
6.07
5.97
0.33
5.83
3.93
6.42
10.08
1.69
74.34
0.62
0.45
1.37
6.10
6.00
0.34
6.01
4.07
6.61
10.96
1.83
74.35
0.66
0.46
1.43
6.14
6.02
0.35
6.19
4.21
6.81
11.67
1.94
74.36
0.70
0.47
1.49
6.17
6.05
0.36
6.36
4.35
7.00
12.37
2.05
74.37
0.75
0.48
1.55
6.20
6.08
0.37
6.54
4.49
7.19
13.26
2.18
74.38
0.80
0.49
1.61
6.24
6.11
0.38
6.72
4.62
7.39
14.14
2.31
74.39
0.84
0.50
1.67
6.27
6.13
0.39
6.89
4.76
7.58
14.85
2.42
74.40
0.89
0.51
1.74
6.31
6.16
0.40
7.07
4.90
7.78
15.73
2.55
74.41
0.94
0.52
1.80
6.34
6.19
0.41
7.25
5.04
7.97
16.62
2.68
74.42
0.99
0.53
1.86
6.37
6.21
0.42
7.42
5.18
8.17
17.50
2.82
74.43
1.05
0.54
1.92
6.41
6.24
0.43
7.60
5.32
8.36
18.56
2.97
74.44
1.10
0.55
1.98
6.44
6.27
0.44
7.78
5.46
8.56
19.45
3.10
74.45
1.15
0.56
2.05
6.47
6.30
0.45
7.95
5.60
8.75
20.33
3.23
74.46
1.21
0.57
2.11
6.51
6.32
0.46
8.13
5.75
8.94
21.39
3.38
74.47
1.27
0.58
2.17
6.54
6.35
0.47
8.31
5.89
9.14
22.45
3.54
74.48
1.33
0.59
2.24
6.58
6.38
0.48
8.49
6.03
9.33
23.51
3.69
74.49
1.38
0.60
2.30
6.61
6.40
0.49
8.66
6.17
9.53
24.40
3.81
74.50
1.44
0.61
2.36
6.64
6.43
0.50
8.84
6.31
9.72
25.46
3.96
74.51
1.51
0.62
2.43
6.68
6.46
0.51
9.02
6.46
9.92
26.69
4.13
74.52
1.57
0.63
2.49
6.72
6.50
0.52
9.19
6.60
10.11
27.75
4.27
74.53
1.63
0.64
2.56
6.76
6.53
0.53
9.37
6.74
10.31
28.81
4.41
74.54
1.69
0.65
2.62
6.80
6.56
0.54
9.55
6.88
10.50
29.88
4.55
74.55
1.76
0.65
2.69
6.83
6.59
0.55
9.72
7.03
10.69
31.11
4.72
74.56
1.82
0.66
2.76
6.87
6.62
0.56
9.90
7.17
10.89
32.17
4.86
74.57
1.89
0.67
2.82
6.91
6.66
0.57
10.08
7.31
11.08
33.41
5.02
74.58
1.96
0.68
2.89
6.95
6.69
0.58
10.25
7.46
11.28
34.65
5.18
74.59
2.03
0.69
2.96
6.99
6.72
0.59
10.43
7.60
11.47
35.89
5.34
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
74.60
2.10
0.69
3.02
7.02
6.75
0.60
10.61
7.74
11.67
37.12
5.50
74.61
2.17
0.70
3.09
7.06
6.78
0.61
10.78
7.89
11.86
38.36
5.66
74.62
2.24
0.71
3.16
7.10
6.82
0.62
10.96
8.03
12.06
39.60
5.81
74.63
2.31
0.72
3.23
7.14
6.85
0.63
11.14
8.17
12.25
40.84
5.96
74.64
2.39
0.72
3.30
7.18
6.88
0.64
11.31
8.32
12.45
42.25
6.14
74.65
2.46
0.73
3.37
7.22
6.91
0.65
11.49
8.46
12.64
43.49
6.29
74.66
2.54
0.74
3.43
7.25
6.94
0.66
11.67
8.61
12.83
44.90
6.47
74.67
2.61
0.75
3.50
7.29
6.98
0.67
11.84
8.75
13.03
46.14
6.61
74.68
2.69
0.75
3.57
7.33
7.01
0.68
12.02
8.90
13.22
47.55
6.78
74.69
2.77
0.76
3.64
7.37
7.04
0.69
12.20
9.04
13.42
48.97
6.96
74.70
2.85
0.77
3.72
7.41
7.07
0.70
12.37
9.19
13.61
50.38
7.13
74.71
2.93
0.77
3.79
7.44
7.11
0.71
12.55
9.33
13.81
51.80
7.28
74.72
3.02
0.78
3.86
7.48
7.14
0.72
12.73
9.48
14.00
53.39
7.48
74.73
3.10
0.79
3.93
7.52
7.17
0.73
12.90
9.63
14.20
54.80
7.64
74.74
3.18
0.80
4.00
7.56
7.20
0.74
13.08
9.77
14.39
56.21
7.81
74.75
3.27
0.80
4.07
7.60
7.23
0.75
13.26
9.92
14.58
57.81
8.00
74.76
3.36
0.81
4.15
7.64
7.27
0.76
13.43
10.06
14.78
59.40
8.17
74.77
3.44
0.82
4.22
7.67
7.30
0.77
13.61
10.21
14.97
60.81
8.33
74.78
3.53
0.82
4.29
7.71
7.33
0.78
13.79
10.36
15.17
62.40
8.51
74.79
3.62
0.83
4.36
7.75
7.36
0.79
13.97
10.50
15.36
63.99
8.69
74.80
3.71
0.84
4.44
7.79
7.39
0.80
14.14
10.65
15.56
65.58
8.87
74.81
3.80
0.84
4.51
7.83
7.43
0.81
14.32
10.79
15.75
67.17
9.04
74.82
3.89
0.85
4.59
7.87
7.46
0.82
14.50
10.94
15.95
68.77
9.22
74.83
3.99
0.86
4.66
7.90
7.49
0.83
14.67
11.09
16.14
70.53
9.42
74.84
4.08
0.86
4.74
7.94
7.52
0.84
14.85
11.24
16.33
72.12
9.59
74.85
4.18
0.87
4.81
7.98
7.55
0.85
15.03
11.38
16.53
73.89
9.79
74.86
4.27
0.87
4.89
8.02
7.59
0.86
15.20
11.53
16.72
75.48
9.95
74.87
4.37
0.88
4.96
8.06
7.62
0.87
15.38
11.68
16.92
77.25
10.14
74.88
4.47
0.89
5.04
8.09
7.65
0.88
15.56
11.83
17.11
79.02
10.33
74.89
4.57
0.89
5.12
8.13
7.68
0.89
15.73
11.97
17.31
80.79
10.52
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
74.90
4.67
0.90
5.19
8.17
7.72
0.90
15.91
12.12
17.50
82.55
10.69
74.91
4.77
0.91
5.27
8.21
7.75
0.91
16.09
12.27
17.70
84.32
10.88
74.92
4.87
0.91
5.35
8.26
7.79
0.92
16.26
12.41
17.89
86.09
11.05
74.93
4.97
0.92
5.43
8.32
7.84
0.93
16.44
12.56
18.08
87.86
11.21
74.94
5.06
0.92
5.51
8.37
7.90
0.94
16.62
12.70
18.28
89.45
11.32
74.95
5.16
0.92
5.59
8.43
7.95
0.95
16.79
12.84
18.47
91.22
11.47
74.96
5.26
0.93
5.66
8.49
8.00
0.96
16.97
12.98
18.67
92.98
11.62
74.97
5.36
0.93
5.75
8.54
8.05
0.97
17.15
13.13
18.86
94.75
11.77
74.98
5.46
0.94
5.83
8.60
8.11
0.98
17.32
13.27
19.06
96.52
11.90
74.99
5.57
0.94
5.91
8.66
8.16
0.99
17.50
13.41
19.25
98.46
12.07
75.00
5.67
0.95
5.99
8.72
8.21
1.00
17.68
13.56
19.45
100.23
12.21
75.01
5.78
0.95
6.07
8.77
8.26
1.01
17.85
13.70
19.64
102.18
12.37
75.02
5.88
0.96
6.15
8.83
8.31
1.02
18.03
13.84
19.83
103.94
12.51
75.03
5.99
0.96
6.24
8.89
8.37
1.03
18.21
13.98
20.03
105.89
12.65
75.04
6.10
0.96
6.32
8.95
8.42
1.04
18.38
14.13
20.22
107.83
12.81
75.05
6.21
0.97
6.41
9.00
8.47
1.05
18.56
14.27
20.42
109.78
12.96
75.06
6.32
0.97
6.49
9.06
8.52
1.06
18.74
14.42
20.61
111.72
13.11
75.07
6.43
0.98
6.58
9.12
8.58
1.07
18.92
14.56
20.81
113.67
13.25
75.08
6.55
0.98
6.66
9.17
8.63
1.08
19.09
14.70
21.00
115.79
13.42
75.09
6.66
0.99
6.75
9.23
8.68
1.09
19.27
14.84
21.20
117.73
13.56
75.10
6.78
0.99
6.84
9.29
8.73
1.10
19.45
14.99
21.39
119.85
13.73
75.11
6.89
1.00
6.92
9.35
8.78
1.11
19.62
15.13
21.58
121.80
13.87
75.12
7.01
1.00
7.01
9.40
8.84
1.12
19.80
15.27
21.78
123.92
14.02
75.13
7.13
1.00
7.10
9.46
8.89
1.13
19.98
15.42
21.97
126.04
14.18
75.14
7.26
1.01
7.19
9.51
8.93
1.14
20.15
15.56
22.17
128.34
14.37
75.15
7.38
1.01
7.28
9.56
8.98
1.15
20.33
15.71
22.36
130.46
14.53
75.16
7.51
1.02
7.37
9.61
9.02
1.16
20.51
15.86
22.56
132.76
14.72
75.17
7.64
1.02
7.46
9.66
9.07
1.17
20.68
16.00
22.75
135.06
14.89
75.18
7.76
1.03
7.55
9.71
9.11
1.18
20.86
16.15
22.95
137.18
15.06
75.19
7.89
1.03
7.64
9.76
9.16
1.19
21.04
16.29
23.14
139.48
15.23
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
75.20
8.03
1.04
7.73
9.81
9.20
1.20
21.21
16.44
23.33
141.95
15.43
75.21
8.16
1.04
7.83
9.86
9.25
1.21
21.39
16.58
23.53
144.25
15.59
75.22
8.29
1.05
7.92
9.91
9.29
1.22
21.57
16.73
23.72
146.55
15.77
75.23
8.43
1.05
8.01
9.96
9.34
1.23
21.74
16.87
23.92
149.02
15.96
75.24
8.56
1.06
8.11
10.01
9.38
1.24
21.92
17.02
24.11
151.32
16.13
75.25
8.70
1.06
8.20
10.06
9.43
1.25
22.10
17.16
24.31
153.80
16.31
75.26
8.84
1.07
8.29
10.11
9.47
1.26
22.27
17.31
24.50
156.27
16.50
75.27
8.98
1.07
8.39
10.16
9.52
1.27
22.45
17.45
24.70
158.75
16.67
75.28
9.12
1.07
8.48
10.21
9.56
1.28
22.63
17.60
24.89
161.22
16.86
75.29
9.26
1.08
8.58
10.26
9.61
1.29
22.80
17.75
25.08
163.69
17.03
75.30
9.40
1.08
8.68
10.31
9.65
1.30
22.98
17.89
25.28
166.17
17.22
75.31
9.55
1.09
8.77
10.36
9.70
1.31
23.16
18.04
25.47
168.82
17.40
75.32
9.69
1.09
8.87
10.41
9.74
1.32
23.33
18.19
25.67
171.30
17.59
75.33
9.84
1.10
8.97
10.46
9.79
1.33
23.51
18.33
25.86
173.95
17.77
75.34
9.99
1.10
9.07
10.51
9.83
1.34
23.69
18.48
26.06
176.60
17.97
75.35
10.14
1.11
9.16
10.56
9.87
1.35
23.86
18.62
26.25
179.25
18.16
75.36
10.29
1.11
9.26
10.61
9.92
1.36
24.04
18.77
26.45
181.90
18.34
75.37
10.44
1.12
9.36
10.66
9.96
1.37
24.22
18.92
26.64
184.55
18.53
75.38
10.60
1.12
9.46
10.71
10.01
1.38
24.40
19.06
26.83
187.38
18.72
75.39
10.75
1.12
9.56
10.76
10.05
1.39
24.57
19.21
27.03
190.03
18.91
75.40
10.91
1.13
9.66
10.81
10.10
1.40
24.75
19.35
27.22
192.86
19.10
75.41
11.06
1.13
9.77
10.86
10.14
1.41
24.93
19.50
27.42
195.51
19.28
75.42
11.22
1.14
9.87
10.91
10.19
1.42
25.10
19.64
27.61
198.34
19.46
75.43
11.38
1.14
9.97
10.96
10.23
1.43
25.28
19.79
27.81
201.17
19.66
75.44
11.54
1.15
10.07
11.01
10.28
1.44
25.46
19.94
28.00
204.00
19.84
75.45
11.70
1.15
10.17
11.06
10.32
1.45
25.63
20.08
28.20
206.83
20.04
75.46
11.87
1.15
10.28
11.11
10.37
1.46
25.81
20.23
28.39
209.83
20.23
75.47
12.03
1.16
10.38
11.16
10.41
1.47
25.99
20.38
28.58
212.66
20.43
75.48
12.20
1.16
10.49
11.21
10.46
1.48
26.16
20.52
28.78
215.67
20.62
75.49
12.36
1.17
10.59
11.26
10.50
1.49
26.34
20.67
28.97
218.50
20.81
-
Station
3100
Slop
e0.00
1802
WSE
Discha
rge
Velocity
Area
WP
Width
Depth
BedShear
Bank
Shear
CurveShear
Stream
Power
UnitS
tream
Power
(masl)
(m3sec1)
(msec1)
(m2 )
(m)
(m)
(m)
(Nm
2 )(N
m2 )
(Nm
2 )(W
m2 )
(Wm
2 )
75.50
12.53
1.17
10.70
11.31
10.55
1.50
26.52
20.81
29.17
221.50
21.00
75.51
12.70
1.18
10.80
11.36
10.59
1.51
26.69
20.96
29.36
224.51
21.20
75.52
12.87
1.18
10.91
11.41
10.64
1.52
26.87
21.11
29.56
227.51
21.38
75.53
13.04
1.18
11.01
11.46
10.68
1.53
27.05
21.25
29.75
230.52
21.58
75.54
13.22
1.19
11.12
11.51
10.73
1.54
27.22
21.40
29.95
233.70
21.78
75.55
13.39
1.19
11.23
11.56
10.77
1.55
27.40
21.55
30.14
236.70
21.98
75.56
13.57
1.20
11.34
11.61
10.81
1.56
27.58
21.69
30.33
239.89
22.19
75.57
13.75
1.20
11.45
11.66
10.86
1.57
27.75
21.84
30.53
243.07
22.38
75.58
13.92
1.21
11.55
11.71
10.90
1.58
27.93
21.99
30.72
246.07
22.58
75.59
14.10
1.21
11.66
11.76
10.95
1.59
28.11
22.13
30.92
249.25
22.76
75.60
14.29
1.21
11.77
11.81
10.99
1.60
28.28
22.28
31.11
252.61
22.99
75.61
14.47
1.22
11.88
11.86
11.04
1.61
28.46
22.42
31.31