Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

5
FOR SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORM DEVELOPMENT AS PER QbD OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FLUID BED TOP SPRAY GRANULATION PROCESS RISKS LOWER HARDNESS INADEQUATE DISINTEGRATION QUALITY COMPROMISED EFFICACY COMPROMISED HIGH FRIABILITY INADEQUATE DISSOLUTION SOFT GRANULES HARD GRANULES HIGHER %FINES HIGHER %AGGLOMERATES FACTORIAL MIXTURE BOX BEHNKEN RESPONSE SURFACE CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C B A BINDER SPRAYING RATE FLUIDIZATION AIR VELOCITY ATOMIZATION AIR PRESSURE DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES DESIGN OF EXPERIMMENTS IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS CASE STUDY 11 © Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary SHIVANG CHAUDHARY Created & Copyrighted by: Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad, INDIA MS Pharm (Pharmaceutics)-NIPER, PGD (Patents Law)-NALSAR [email protected]

Transcript of Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

Page 1: Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

FOR SOLID ORAL DOSAGE FORM DEVELOPMENT AS PER QbD

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FLUID BED TOP SPRAY GRANULATION PROCESS

RISKS

LOWER HARDNESS INADEQUATE DISINTEGRATION

QUALITY COMPROMISED EFFICACY COMPROMISED

HIGH FRIABILITY INADEQUATE DISSOLUTION

SOFT GRANULES HARD GRANULES

HIGHER %FINES HIGHER %AGGLOMERATES

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE

C

B

A BINDER SPRAYING RATE

FLUIDIZATION AIR VELOCITY

ATOMIZATION AIR PRESSURE

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DESIGN OF EXPERIMMENTS

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

CA

SE

STU

DY

11

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

SHIVANG CHAUDHARY Created & Copyrighted by:

Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad, INDIA MS Pharm (Pharmaceutics)-NIPER, PGD (Patents Law)-NALSAR

[email protected]

Page 2: Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

Factors (Variables) Levels of Factors studied -α -1 0 +1 +α

A Binder Spraying Rate (gm/min) 1.64gm/min 3 gm/min 5 gm/min 7 gm/min 8.36gm/min B Atomization Pressure (bar) 0.32bar 1 bar 2 bar 3 bar 3.68bar C Fluidization Air Velocity (cfm) 32.96cfm 50 cfm 75 cfm 100 cfm 117.04cfm

NO. OF FACTORS

NO. OF LEVELS

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SELECTED

ADD. CENTER POINTS

TOTAL NO OF EXPERIMENTAL RUNS (NO OF TRIALS)

3

5

CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE RSM for 3 factors

5

8 fp +6 sp +6 cp =20

OBJECTIVE To Optimize CPPs of Fluid Bed Granulation Process

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DESIGNING OF EXPERIMMENTS

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FLUID BED TOP SPRAY GRANULATION FOR SOLID ORALS

A BINDER SPRAYING RATE

C

FLU

IDIZ

ATI

ON

AIR

VE

LOC

ITY

CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

1

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 3: Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

DESIGN OF EXPERIMMENTS

CQAs CPPs

PREDICTION EFFECT EQUATION OF EACH FACTOR, THEIR INTERACTIONS & CURVATURES ON INDIVIDUAL RESPONSE BY QUADRATIC MODEL

Agglomerates (%w/w) = +2.27 +1.61A -0.42B -0.61c +0.063AB +0.44AC -0.012BC +0.68A2 +0.82B2 +0.15C2

Fines (%w/w) = +1.63 -0.88A +3.659E-003B +1.52C +0.00AB +0.25AC +0.23BC +0.53A2 +0.16B2 +1.47C2

%Process Efficiency (%) = +95.83 -0.32A +0.42B -1.52C +0.00AB -1.00 AC +0.25BC -1.85A2 -0.78B2 -2.02C2

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FLUID BED TOP SPRAY GRANULATION FOR SOLID ORALS

CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

1

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 4: Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS

DESIGN OF EXPERIMMENTS

Responses (Effects) Goal for Individual Responses Y1 Agglomerates (%w/w) Agglomerates should NMT 2.5%w/w Y2 Fines (%w/w) Fines should NMT 2.5%w/w Y3 Process Efficiency (%) To achieve the maximum process efficiency (%yield) NLT 95%w/w

Factors (Variables) Knowledge Space Design Space Control Space A Spraying Rate (gm/min) 3-7 3.75-5.25 4-5 B Atomization Pressure (bar) 1-3 1.25-3 1.5-3 C Fluidization Air Velocity (cfm) 50-100 55-85 60-80

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

FACTORIAL MIXTURE

BOX BEHNKEN

RESPONSE SURFACE

ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN SPACE

OPTIMIZATION OF CPPs OF FLUID BED TOP SPRAY GRANULATION FOR SOLID ORALS

CIRCUMSCRIBED CENTRAL COMPOSITE C

ASE

ST

UD

Y 1

1

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Page 5: Fluid bed top spray granulation process 3 f cccd rsm model by shivang chaudhary

THANK YOU SO MUCH FROM

DESIGN IS A JOURNEY OF DISCOVERY…

© Created & Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

SHIVANG CHAUDHARY

© Copyrighted by Shivang Chaudhary

Quality Risk Manager & Intellectual Property Sentinel- CIIE, IIM Ahmedabad MS (Pharmaceutics)- National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education & Research (NIPER), INDIA

PGD (Patents Law)- National academy of Legal Studies & Research (NALSAR), INDIA

+91 -9904474045, +91-7567297579 [email protected]

https://in.linkedin.com/in/shivangchaudhary

facebook.com/QbD.PAT.Pharmaceutical.Development