$fltflfltC ^Onrt .af t0 4 'toCLlENTS' SECURITY FUND

65 SOUTH FRONT STREET 5TH FLOOR, COLUMBUS, OHlO 43215-3431

CHIEF JUSTICEMAUREEN O'CONNOR

USTICESPAUL E. PFEIFERTERRENCE O'DONNELL

JUDITH ANN LANZINGERSHARON L. KENNEDY

JUDITH L. FRENCH

WILLiAM M.O'NEfLL

Kristina D. Frost, ClerkSupreme Court of Ohio65 South Front Street, 8th FloorColumbus, Ohio 43215

Re: Sa.Keya MonCheree Stubbs

Dear Ms. Frost:

ADMfNISTPATC!?

JANET GREEN MARBCEY

TELEPHONE 614.387.93901.1300.231.1680

FACSIMILE 614.387.9399www.supromecourt.ohio.gov

c,̂ ^_ __...^ ^

.^ -.- .4 N'..' .^. ^..,i_- i

Enclosed please find copies of the Claim Determination Entry for awards made by the Boardof Commissioners of the Clients` Securifiy Fund of Ohio in the following clairns;

CSF CLAIM NO.12-003812-004812-002R

CLAIMANTReana JacksonKouth NakharathYolanda H. Yisrael

AWARD$225$1,000$375

These awards arose from the dishonest conduct of SaKeya MonCheree Stubbs. We ask thatthe information concerning the awards made by the Clients' Security Fund be placed in theattorney's file.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,

J et Green Marbley, AdministratorClients' Security Fund

JGM/ pdIEnclosures: as stated

^^^s... ^- %^

July 17, 2013

) [ y[^^

The Supreme Court of OhioCdients' Security Furtd

65 South Front Street, 5tr FloorCoItiriibus, Ohio 43215-3431

Maureen O'Cr»z no rCltief .Tustire

Sally W. Cuni `unet Green MarbleyChair Administraior

CLALM DETERMINATION ENI'i'I&Y

In Re.tipplication of Reana Jach.son (fka t1Len) v. SaKeya.IvlonCh.eree StubbsCiaim. Number 12-003$

This cause carrfe on for hc-aring before the Board of Cosrugiissioners of the CJsents' Secua-ity Fundthis 7th day of June 2013 oi1 the application of Reaala Jackson (fka .A31en) aileo-ig a loss in the amountof $150, caused by dishonest conduct of an attorney duly licensed to practice in the State of CJl-do

The Carrnzissioners of the Clients' Security Fund of Ohio find tliat:

a) A.n aftorn.ey client relationship did exist betvveen the claimant andSaKeya MortCheree Stubbs.

T'rie claimaa3t suffered a loss of $225 on or about January, 2010.

Tlie Coinrrussioners further find that the dishonest conduct consisted of theft of uneai7zed fees,and that the following disciplir^taz•y proceedings were taken:

i_3 I SBA. RI i E D on 13 , J 2 9/2012

The Comani.ssioners further find that the claiunwlt took affirmative action against the attorneyu%it'ILin one yeai• of becoming aware of the loss; and that there is no insurance or bond whichwillbenefit tl-ce clairnantj and that said claimant is not a spouse, close relative, partner; insurer or bondingcampany, nor a goz-ernxnental uiit.

Therefore the C.o=uni.ssioners of the Clients' Security Fw1d do hereby deterr-dne that the claimof Reana Jacksc^n(fka Allen) is eIigible for reimburseznerat in the amount of ^225.

Payment of said amowit is conditioned upon claimant complying writh f-lie subrogationassignment aFad other requirements of Sec. 6 of GOV. Rule VfII of the Ohio Supren-te Court.

AXD

_Dat ^ p ^^,

The Sict3reiize Court of OhioClients' SecurityFund

65 South Front Street, 3'th FloorColumbus, Ohio 43215-3431

_n!taureen O'CozizarCh iQf jus-11 ice

Sally W Criria Jarref Green MarbleyChair Adnainzsb-a#or

CLAIM DETERMINATION ENTRY

In Re fipplication of Kouth I`vaxhasat.h v. SaKeya MonCheree StiibbsClaim Number 12-0048

Tliis cause came on for .hearirEg tzefore the Board of Conimissioners of the Chents'Security Fundthis 7hday of June 2013 ori the application of Kouth Kilkzaratlx alleging a loss in the amount of $2,9:00,caused by dishonest conduct of an attorrbey dupy IicQrtsed to practice in the State ofQmo

The Cornnussioners of the Chents' Security Fund of tJh.io find that:

a) An attomey client relafioilshi.p did exist bet45reen the claimantandSaKeva MonCheree Sttabbs.

ti) The claimant suffered a loss of $1,000 on or about Februaxy 8, 2010.

'Ihe Comrnissioners further find that the dishonest conduct consisted of theft of unearned fees,and that the following disciplii-iary proceechn:gs were taken:

DISBARRED on IV29/2012

The Courn-dssioners further firid Lhat the claimant took affirmative action against the attornPywithin one year of becoming aware of the loss; a-nd that there is no in.surance or bond which willbenefit the clainian.t; and that said claimant is not a spouse, close relative, partner, insurer or bondingcompany, nor a governmental xu dt.

Therefore the, Coin.nussaoners of the Clients' Security Fund do.herehy- determine that the claimof Kouth Nakharath is eligible for reimbursement in the an:-ioumt of $1,000.

Payment of said amount is conditioned upon claimartt complying with the subrogationassignment and other pequirements of Sec. 6 of GOV. Rule VIII of the 0hio Suprerrie Couzt.

Dat ^ Ch `

---- ^Dat Sec e ^r3'

Thp ,^^ ^^^^o ('n^rrf nf nliinrClients` Secaarity Fund

65 Soutis Froiit Street, 5th FloorColumbus, Ohio 4321:5-3431

Maureen O'ConnorChief Justice

Sallxi W Cuni Jartef Green 11ilarbleljCJuzir Adrnitaistrator

CLAIM DETFR1kTLNA'I"TORi- ENTRY

In Re Application of Yolaflda H. Yisrael v. Sa.Keya MonCheree StubbsClaim Numher 12-0029

TI-ds cause came on for hearingbefore the Board of Comn-dssioners of the Cl'zents'SecLrity Fiindthis 7th day of June 2013 on the application of Yolanda H. Yisr aeI alIeginl;a loss in the anount of $750,caused by dishonest coi-iduct of an attornev duly licen.sed to practice in the State of Ohio

The Conunissioners of the C:iients' Sec-urity Fund of Ohio find that:

a) A-n attorney client relationship did exist betc.veen the c3airnanf andSaKeya MonCheree Stzabbso

b) i.^e clainian-t suffered a loss of $375 on or about L:3ctober, 2010.

The C:onuniissiort ers f-arther find that the dishonest conduct consisted of theft of unearned fees,and tliat the following disciplinary proceedings were taken:

DISBARRED an 11/29/2012

'Fhe Conunissioners further find that the claimailf took affirmative action against the attorneywithin one year of becoming aware of the 1ossy and that there is no ansurance or bond vahich willbenefit the claimant; and d:hat said claimant is not a spouse, close relative, partner; insurer or bondingcompany, nor a governmental -culit.

Therefore the Commissioners of the Clients' Secuxit^, Fund do herebv deferrrz:dne that the claimof Yolanda H. Yisrael is eligihle for rezmhussoynent in the amount of $375,

Paymei-ct of said aznourtt is conditioned upon claimant complying with the subrogationassignment and other requirements of Sec. 6 of GOV; Rule VIrI of the Ohio Supreme Court.

141D ^

^^13Dat retary