Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation...

172
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Report Revision: 1 Date: 05/20/2014 Learjet 45 LR / 45 / -40, -45, -70, -75 Troy A. Zwicke Chair, Flight Standardization Board Federal Aviation Administration Kansas City Aircraft Evaluation Group 901 Locust Street, Room 332 Kansas City, MO 64106

Transcript of Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation...

Page 1: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

U.S. Department of TransportationFederal Aviation AdministrationWashington, D.C.

Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Report

Revision: 1Date: 05/20/2014

Learjet 45LR / 45 / -40, -45, -70, -75

Troy A. ZwickeChair, Flight Standardization Board

Federal Aviation AdministrationKansas City Aircraft Evaluation Group

901 Locust Street, Room 332Kansas City, MO 64106

Telephone: (816) 329-3233FAX: (816) 329-3241

Page 2: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

RECORD OF REVISIONS

Revision Number Section Pages Affected DateOriginal ALL ALL 05/10/1998

1 ALL ALL 05/20/2014

HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE

Revision 1: Entire report combined pertinent information from; Original LR/45-45 FSB report dated 05/10/1998 and Original LR/45-40 FSB report dated 03/03/2006, into a single report including all Learjet Model Aircraft including LR/45-40, LR/45-45, LR/45-70 and LR/45-75.

No Change Bars were added, the entire report has been revised / updated.

Page 2 of 120

Page 3: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

RECORD OF REVISIONS................................................................................................2

HIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGE ...........................................................................................2

CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................3

1. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY..................................................................................5

2. PILOT TYPE RATING REQUIREMENTS......................................................................7

3. MASTER DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS (MDR)......................................................8

4. OPERATOR DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS (ODR)..................................................8

5. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING........................................................................9

6. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR CHECKING....................................................................13

7. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECENCY OF EXPERIENCE.......................................15

8. AIRCRAFT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST.........................................15

9. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING DEVICES AND SIMULATORS................17

10. APPLICATION OF FSB REPORT..................................................................................17

11. ALTERNATE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE...................................................................17

12. MISCELLANEOUS.........................................................................................................18

Page 3 of 120

Page 4: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

CONTENTS

APPENDIX 1. MDR TABLE................................................................................................20

APPENDIX 2. ODR TABLES..............................................................................................21

Annex A - ODR Definitions -Training Levels..................................................................21

Annex B – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 40..............................................................22

Annex C – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 75..............................................................24

Annex D – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 70.............................................................31

Annex E – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 45..............................................................39

Annex F – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 75..............................................................41

Annex G – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 70.............................................................49

Annex H – ODR Table: Learjet 75 to Learjet 70.............................................................56

Annex I – ODR Table: Learjet 75 to Learjet 45...............................................................58

Annex J – ODR Table: Learjet 75 to Learjet 40...............................................................65

Annex K – ODR Table: Learjet 70 to Learjet 75.............................................................72

Annex L – ODR Table: Learjet 70 to Learjet 45..............................................................74

Annex M – ODR Table: Learjet 70 to Learjet 40.............................................................82

APPENDIX 3 AIRCRAFT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST......................89

APPENDIX 4. PILOT TRAINING COURSE OUTLINES................................................115

Page 4 of 120

Page 5: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

1. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY

1.1 Primary Purpose. The primary purpose of this report is to specify Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) master training, checking and currency requirements applicable to flight crews operating the Bombardier Learjet (LR) Model 45 aircraft. This report can assist Title 14 Code of Federal Regulation (14 CFR) part 91 subpart K (91K) fractional ownership program, part 135 air carrier operators and part 142 training centers in the development and approval of the training programs by their Principal Operations Inspector (POI) and FAA Training Center Program Managers (TCPM). Note: All regulatory references within this report are found in 14 CFR, unless otherwise indicated.

The guidelines in this report also apply to operations inspectors, Aircrew Program Managers (APM), 14 CFR part 135 air carrier check airmen and instructors, airline transport pilots instructing in air transportation service, certificated flight and ground instructors, aircrew program designees, Training Center Evaluators (TCE), and part 61, 135, 141 and 142 training providers.

This report also provides information which is advisory in nature, but may be mandatory (under part 91K management specifications and part 135 operation specifications) if the designated configurations apply and if approved for that operator.

1.2 This report specifies master training, checking, and currency requirements applicable to pilots operating LR-45 aircraft. Provisions of this report:

a) Identify the pilot "type rating" assigned to the LR-40, LR-45, LR-70 and LR-75,

b) Describe any unique requirement applicable to initial, differences or recurrent training,

c) Describe MDRs for flight crews requiring differences qualification for mixed-fleet-flying or differences, if applicable,

d) Provide examples of ODR tables, if applicable,

e) Describe acceptable training program and training device characteristics when necessary to establish compliance with applicable regulations, and MDR table, if applicable.

f) Identify checking and currency standards to be applied by the FAA or operators and,

g) Provide a listing of regulatory compliance status (compliance checklist) for part 91 and part 135, Advisory Circulars (AC), and other operationally related criteria.

1.3 This report addresses LR-45 aircraft identified in FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) # T00008WI. Unless otherwise specified, LR-45 means the LR-40, LR-45, LR-70 and LR-75. This report is also applicable to all training and checking conducted in the aircraft, as well as the currency and experience requirements.

1.4 The provisions of this FSB report are effective until amended, superseded, or withdrawn by subsequent revisions to this report.

Page 5 of 120

Page 6: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

1.5 Determinations made in this report are based on the evaluations of specific LR-45 aircraft equipped in a production configuration and in accordance with current regulations and guidance. Modifications and differences made to the model described herein, or introduction of new related aircraft, may require amendment of the findings in this report. The FSB reserves responsibility / authority to re-evaluate and modify sections of this report based on new or revised AC information or revisions to part 91 and part 135, aircraft operating experience, or the testing of new or modified aircraft under the provisions of AC 120-53, Guidance for Conducting and Use of Flight Standardization Board Evaluations, as revised.

1.6 Terminology. The term "must" is used in this report, even though it is recognized that this report, and the AC 120-53 , on which it is based, provides one acceptable means, but not necessarily the only means, of compliance with part 91K and part 135. The term "must" acknowledges the need for operators to fully comply with the FSB report provisions if AC 120-53 is to be used by the operator as its means of complying with part 91K and part 135

1.7 This report includes:

a) minimum training, checking, and currency requirements for FAA field offices to use for approving operator programs (e.g. MDRs, Type Rating designations, etc.),

b) general advisory information which may be approved for that operator (e.g. MDR footnotes, ODR tables), and

c) information which is used to facilitate FAA review of an aircraft type or related aircraft that is proposed for use by an operator (e.g. compliance checklist), and

d) requirement for Inspectors and Designees / Check Airmen to receive initial and recurrent training on both LR-40/45 and LR-70/75, to administer checks.

1.8 Relevant acronyms are defined as follows:

AC Advisory CircularACO Aircraft Certification OfficeADS Automatic Dependent SurveillanceAEG Aircraft Evaluation GroupAFCS Automatic Flight Control SystemAFM Airplane Flight ManualANP Actual Navigation PerformanceAPM Aircrew Program ManagerASI Aviation Safety InspectorATP Airline Transport PilotBC Back CourseCFIT Controlled Flight Into Terrain14 CFR Title 14 of the Code of Federal RegulationsCHDO Certificate Holding District OfficeCPDLC Controller Pilot Data Link CommunicationCNS Communications, Navigation and SurveillanceDEEC Digital Electronic Engine ControllerDP Departure Procedure

Page 6 of 120

Page 7: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

EFB Electronic Flight BagEICAS Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting SystemESIS Electronic Standby Instrumentation SystemFAA Federal Aviation AdministrationFAF Final Approach FixFANS Future Air Navigation SystemsFMS Flight Management SystemFSB Flight Standardization BoardFFS Full Flight SimulatorFTD Flight Training DeviceGPWS Ground Proximity Warning SystemIACRA Integrated Airman Certification and Rating ApplicationIAP Instrument Approach ProcedureICAO International Civil Aviation OrganizationIPT Integrated Procedures TrainerJAA Joint Airworthiness AuthorityLOC Localizer LOE Line Oriented EvaluationLOFT Line Oriented Flight TrainingLR Bombardier LearjetMDR Master Differences RequirementsMFD Multi-Function DisplayMFW Multi-Function WindowNDB Non-Directional Radio BeaconNOTAM Notices to AirmanNSP National Simulator ProgramODR Operator Differences RequirementsPIC Pilot In CommandPFD Primary Flight DisplayPOI Principal Operations InspectorPTS Practical Test StandardRNP Required Navigation PerformanceRVSM Reduced Vertical Separation MinimumSIC Second In CommandSOE Supervised Operating ExperienceSTAR Standard Terminal Arrival RouteTCAS Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance SystemTCDS Type Certificate Data SheetTCE Training Center EvaluatorTCPM Training Center Program ManagerVOR Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range91K 14 CFR Part 91 Subpart K

2. PILOT "TYPE RATING" REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Pilot-In-Command (PIC) Type Rating. In accordance with the provisions of part 1, 61, and 135, the same pilot type rating is assigned to the LR-40, LR-45, LR-70 and LR-75 aircraft and is designated “LR-45”.

Page 7 of 120

Page 8: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

2.2 Second-In-Command (SIC) Type Rating. In accordance with the provisions of § 61.55 and FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 5, Chapter 2, Section 5, Paragraph 5-325, a SIC Privileges Only type rating can be issued as "LR-45" with Limitation for “LR-45 SIC Privileges Only”.

3. MASTER DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS

3.1. Common Requirements. (All LR-45 aircraft).

3.1.1. Autopilot Engage Altitudes. As referenced in the FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), the LR-45 aircraft has specifically been evaluated for autopilot suitability engagement after takeoff. Autopilot engaged takeoff is not authorized. 3.1.2. Minimum Altitude for Autopilot Use. The LR-45 aircraft has specifically been evaluated for autopilot suitability for continued use during precision approaches, non-precision approaches and in the go-around mode as referenced in the FAA Approved AFM. Autopilot engaged landing is not authorized.

3.1.3 Landing Minima Categories. Landing Minima Category for the LR-45 aircraft is Category “C” for normal straight-in landing approaches and normal circling approaches.

3.1.4 Normal "Final Landing Flap Setting". The normal "final landing flap setting" per § 91.126(c) is considered to be "Flaps 40" for all LR-45 aircraft. Normal straight in precision, non-precision and circling approaches are flown with Flaps 40 from the Final Approach Fix (FAF) and use of the Flight Management System (FMS) for constant angle non-precision approaches is recommended, if possible. Landing with flaps settings other than “Flaps 40” is by an Abnormal or Emergency procedure only. No flap approach and landing is not waived. Training and checking is required.

3.1.5 Special / Unique Requirements. No other special or unique requirements common to all LR-45 aircraft are identified.

3.2 Master Difference Requirements.

3.2.1 Requirements for particular LR-45 Related Aircraft Combinations. MDRs for related LR-45 aircraft are shown in Appendix 1. These provisions apply when differences between related aircraft exist which affect crew knowledge, skills, or abilities related to flight safety (e.g., Level A or greater differences).

3.2.2 MDR Footnotes. Footnotes to MDR requirements define acceptable "required means" or "alternate means" of compliance. A footnote can indicate requirements that are less restrictive than the basic designation, or more restrictive than the basic designation, depending on the significance of the differences between related aircraft.

4. OPERATOR DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS TABLE

4.1 ODR Tables. ODR tables are used to show an operator's compliance method. ODR tables for operators conducting mixed fleet operations, using the LR-45 aircraft are shown in Appendix 2. The ODR tables represent an acceptable means to comply with MDR provisions based on those differences and compliance methods shown. The tables do not necessarily represent the only acceptable means of

Page 8 of 120

Page 9: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

compliance for operators with airplanes having other differences, where compliance methods (e.g., devices, simulators, etc.) are different. For operators flying the LR-45 aircraft, the ODR tables in Appendix 2 have been found acceptable, and therefore, may be approved by a POI for a particular operator.

4.2 Operator Preparation of ODR Tables. Operators flying a “mixed fleet” of LR-45 aircraft must have approved ODR tables applicable to their fleet.

4.3 ODR Table Coordination. Unless identical or equivalent ODR tables have been previously approved by the FAA, new ODR tables proposed by operators should be coordinated with the FSB prior to FAA approval and implementation. FSB coordination ensures consistent treatment of related LR-45 aircraft between various operators, and compatibility of each ODR table with MDR provisions.

4.4 ODR Table Distribution. Original FAA approved ODR tables are to be retained by the operator. Copies of FAA approved ODR tables are to be retained by the Certificate Holding District Office (CHDO) and should be provided to the LR-45 FSB Chair at the Kansas City Aircraft Evaluation Group (AEG).

5. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING

5.1 Assumptions Regarding Airmen’s Previous Experience. The provisions of this section apply to programs for airmen who have experience in part 91K or part 135 operations and multi-engine transport turbojet aircraft including glass cockpit and FMS experience. For airmen not having this experience, additional requirements will be necessary in accordance with part 61.

5.2 SIC Training. SIC training is mandatory in accordance with § 61.55 for airmen serving as a SIC on the LR-45. A SIC type rating is required for international operations in accordance with International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards.

Training programs should address all training elements of § 61.55 and include tasks stipulated in Section 5, FSB Specifications for Training: Areas of Emphasis, Training for Seat Dependent Tasks. A SIC Pilot Type Rating may be issued when all required training and documentation; including tasks stipulated by this report, are completed satisfactorily.

5.3 Pilots Initial, Transition and Upgrade Training

5.3.1 Pilots Initial, Transition and Upgrade Ground Training. Initial, transition, or upgrade ground training for the LR-45 aircraft is accomplished as specified by §§ 61.155, 91.1101 or 135.345. No unique provisions or requirements are specified.

5.3.2 Pilots Initial, Transition and Upgrade Flight Training. Initial, transition, or upgrade flight training for the LR-45 aircraft is accomplished as specified by §§ 61.157, 91.1103 or 135.347. No unique provisions or requirements are specified

5.3.3 Crewmember Emergency Training. Crewmember emergency training should be conducted for the LR-45 aircraft in accordance with part 61, part 91K or part 135. The objective of emergency training for the LR-45 aircraft is to provide crewmembers with the necessary knowledge concerning emergency equipment, situations, and procedures, to ensure implementation of the correct actions in the event of an emergency.

Page 9 of 120

Page 10: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Emergency training consists of instruction on the location, function, and operation of emergency equipment that is different in each related LR-45 aircraft and from other aircraft in the operator's fleet. Where emergency equipment is common, instruction may be adjusted for crewmembers qualified and current on this equipment, provided records are available which demonstrate that crewmembers meet the §§ 91.1083 or 135.331 requirements.

Emergency training also consists of instruction in crewmember emergency assignments and procedures including; crew coordination and communication, handling of emergency or unusual situations, emergency performance and observation drills, that are specific to LR-45 aircraft.

In accordance with §§ 91.1083, 135.331 and FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 19, Section 4, emergency training requirements refer to two types of training: "general" emergency training and "aircraft specific" emergency training. General emergency training is instruction on those emergency items that are common to all LR-45 aircraft in the operator's fleet, e.g., instruction on fire extinguishers and firefighting procedures, if common to all aircraft. Aircraft specific emergency training is training on those items that are specific to LR-45 related aircraft.

As part of an approved training program, an operator may use several methods when conducting aircraft specific emergency training including; classroom instruction, pictures, videotape, ground training devices, computer-based instruction, and static aircraft training.

There are no specified training program hours for Crewmember Emergency Training. A chart addressed in FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 3, Chapter 19, Section 4, table 3-47 provides "National Norms" for the approval of the general emergency training program hours. The complexity of the different related LR-45 aircraft and the complexity of the type of operation to be conducted should be considered when approving the LR-45 aircraft specific emergency training.

5.3.4 Areas of Emphasis. The following areas of emphasis should be addressed during ground and flight training:

a) Flight Instruments. The Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS), the Primary Flight Displays (PFD), and Multi-Function Displays (MFD). Altitude and airspeed are presented on vertical scale instruments in both digital and analog formats. Pilots need to be able to understand the multitude of information presented on all the displays. Pilots transitioning from traditional round dial basic "T" instruments may require additional training and instrument scan practice to gain proficiency in manually flying by reference to the PFD. Recognition of display failures, reversionary modes, and appropriate corrective action to be taken should be addressed.

b) Flight Control System. An operational understanding of the basic modes of operation as well as an understanding of the primary and secondary flight control systems and their associated system components. Pitch and roll mechanical disconnect should only be demonstrated in the simulator, and should never be utilized in the aircraft unless checklist requires it. Demonstration of pitch and roll mechanical disconnect is not required for the practical test.

c) Flight Guidance System including the Autopilot and Flight Director. An understanding of the various lateral and vertical modes and the ability to select and arm the various modes during different phases of flight is essential. An operational understanding of the autopilot and flight director limitations and the skills and ability to operate the aircraft in compliance with associated limitations.

Page 10 of 120

Page 11: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

d) Digital Electronic Engine Control (DEEC). An operational understanding of the DEEC and the engine thrust selection and limitations are required.

e) Control Panels. System control panels using pushbuttons with integral light bars. Pilots should have an understanding of the switch position and system configuration as it relates to whether the light bar is illuminated or not. This understanding is required for both normal and abnormal system operation.

f) LR-70/75 Touch Screen Controllers. Pilots should have an understanding of touch screen controllers, navigation through the various pages, the selected touch key position and system configuration as it relates to system operation. This understanding is required for both normal, abnormal and emergency system operation.

g) LR-70/75 G5000 system functionality concerning touch screen controllers, synoptic pages, display softkeys, FMS functions, database currency requirements, synthetic vision, annunciations, flight planning, hazard avoidance systems, system failure modes and back up controllers.

h) Any other function / area deemed appropriate by the FSB.

5.3.5 Training for Seat Dependent Tasks. Accomplishment of certain tasks, procedures, or maneuvers require training of a crewmember for a particular crew position (i.e. captain, first officer, check airman, etc.). Training programs should recognize and address the necessary seat / position related tasks for the applicable crewmember. Accordingly, training programs should address seat dependent tasks or maneuvers to the extent necessary to ensure crew proficiency at each position, and in accordance with ODR tables when applicable.

Features or Procedures which could have Seat Dependent Elements include the following:

a) Rejected Takeoffb) Emergency Descentc) Abnormal and Emergency Procedures that require locating circuit breakers in the left and

right crew seatd) Crew coordination for manual gear extensione) Environmental controls at right crew seatf) Oxygen controls at left crew seat

5.4 Differences Training.

5.4.1 General. Unless an initial or transition program is completed for each related aircraft, differences training is required for each related aircraft, as provided in MDR and ODR tables (reference §§ 91.1103 or 135.347). MDR and ODR tables provide guidelines for differences training requirements applicable to particular aircraft equipage.

a) A Differences Training Program prerequisite is that a trainee has completed initial, upgrade, or transition training in one related aircraft and will receive differences training for the other related aircraft.

b) When a Differences Training Program involves related aircraft having the same Pilot Type Rating, coverage of differences may be completed either coincident with each phase of an

Page 11 of 120

Page 12: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

initial, upgrade, or transition training course, or following completion of that training course. The differences training must be consistent with the provisions of the approved applicable MDR / ODR Tables.

5.4.2 Differences Ground Training. Differences ground training is required on the topics applicable to the pertinent related aircraft and is shown by applicable ODR tables.

5.4.3 Differences Flight Training. Difference flight training is required in the topics and maneuvers applicable to the pertinent related aircraft that is shown by applicable ODR tables.

5.4.4 Fleets with Different Engine Types. Mixed fleet flying of LR-45 aircraft with different engine types (e.g. LR-45 aircraft with -20AR, -20BR and -40BR engines) require additional training as shown by applicable MDR / ODR tables.

5.5 Recurrent Training:

5.5.1 Recurrent Ground Training. Courses must include appropriate training in accordance with §§ 91.1107 or 135.351 for each related LR-45 aircraft as specified by MDR and ODR tables for differences training.

5.5.2 Recurrent Flight Training. Courses require appropriate maneuvers and procedures identified in §§ 91.1107 or 135.351 or as otherwise described in this report. Maneuvers and procedures must account for differences between each related LR-45 aircraft operated. The ODR table(s) must identify the differences.

5.5.3 Mixed Fleet Operations Recurrent Training Considerations. For mixed fleet flying, Recurrent Training must include differences in accordance with MDR and ODR tables. Recurrent training will alternate between LR40/45 and LR70/75 aircraft.

5.6 Operating Experience:

5.6.1 Operating Experience Pertinent to Each Flight Crewmember. Operating experience must be obtained while serving in a primary crew position. Operating experience for the LR-45 aircraft may be accomplished in any related LR-45 aircraft provided differences are accomplished in accordance with an acceptable ODR table for mixed fleet flying.

5.6.2 Mixed Fleet Flying Operating experience. Separate operating experience applies to the LR-40/45 and LR-70/75 aircraft.

5.6.3 Supervised Operating Experience (SOE). SOE required for a PIC Type Rating in accordance with part 61 pilot certification must be accomplished from the left pilot seat. SOE required by pilot certification should include the following tasks listed in 5.2.3 Crewmember Emergency Training, 5.2.4 Areas of Emphasis, 5.2.5 Training for Seat Dependent Tasks, and applicable differences when mixed fleet flying.

5.7 Other Training:

5.7.1 Line Oriented Flight Training (LOFT) Programs. LOFT programs are approved in accordance with existing regulations.

Page 12 of 120

Page 13: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

5.7.2 Instrument Approaches. Only Category I approaches are permitted by certification. Operators should ensure that flight crews are familiar with appropriate use of the Mode Select Panel, Automatic Flight Control System (AFCS) / Autopilot, Standby Instruments / Electronic Standby Instrument System (ESIS) and FMS / G5000, including modes to be used for the types of instrument approaches to be flown and methods in lieu of or in conjunction with Non-Directional Radio Beacon (NDB), Very High Frequency Omni-Directional Radio Beacon (VOR), Localizer (LOC), or Back Course Localizer (BC) procedures.

5.7.3 Long Range / Extended Range / Overwater Flights. Due to criticality of fuel computations, flight crews should be familiar with all aspects of fuel management to include normal and abnormal procedures, published flight planning information, and the manner in which fuel computations are made.

5.7.4 Hazardous Weather and Winter Operations. Proper precautions and procedures regarding hazardous weather / winter operations, which may be unique to LR-45 aircraft should be addressed. Topics such as wing / tail de-ice, antiskid braking characteristics, procedures for windshear identification and recovery techniques, hazards associated with rejected takeoffs near V1, and other such topics.

5.7.5 Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT). Due to continued efforts to reduce exposure to CFIT accidents, special emphasis on this topic is appropriate. Emphasis on altitude awareness, Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) warnings, situational awareness and crew coordination is appropriate.

5.7.6 Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM). Operations training programs and operating practices and procedures to include Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) alerts and annunciations.

5.7.7 Future Air Navigation Systems (FANS). Flight Crews operating aircraft equipped with FANS software should receive appropriate instruction in its general operational functions, appropriate uses for areas of operation, routes, or procedures to be flown. General training should address Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance (CNS) functions covered by FANS, Required Navigation Performance (RNP), and Actual Navigation Performance (ANP). In addition, sufficient training in use of Controller Pilot Data Link Communication (CPDLC) and Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS) to ensure adequate knowledge, skill, and proficiency for flight crews to operate the above system(s) in typical daily operations (requiring their use) should be provided when installed.

5.8 Training Objective. The objective of both ground and flight training is to train to proficiency.

6. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR CHECKING

6.1 Checking Items. . Testing, Checking and Evaluations specified by part 61, part 91K, part 135 and FAA Practical Test Standards (PTS).

6.1.1 Areas of emphasis. The following areas of emphasis should be addressed during checks:

a) Proficiency with manual and auto-pilot engaged flight must be demonstrated.

Page 13 of 120

Page 14: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

b) Proper selection and use of PFD / MFD displays, flight director, and Flight Guidance System modes should be demonstrated, particularly during instrument approaches.

c) Demonstration of FMS / G5000 navigation proficiency including departures, arrivals, holds and approaches.

d) Proper outside visual scan without prolonged fixation on FMS / G5000 system while demonstrating proficient operation of the FMS / G5000 system including failure of component(s) / mode(s).

6.1.2 No Flap Landings. Demonstration of a No Flap approach and landing during a check is appropriate. When the flight test is conducted in the airplane in actual flight, a touchdown from a no flap approach is not required and should not be attempted in accordance with FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 3, Section 2, Paragraph 5-832. The approach should be flown to the point where the FAA Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI), check airman or examiner can determine if the landing would occur in the touchdown zone.

6.2 Type Ratings

6.2.1 Oral Examinations. Oral examinations for the LR-45 aircraft may be completed at the end of the academic phase of training. When an airman is qualifying in only one related aircraft, oral test items need only address the model for which the test is being conducted.

6.2.2 Practical Tests. Practical tests may follow standard provisions of part 61 and PTS. The satisfactory completion of a practical type rating evaluation in any related LR-45 aircraft will meet the requirement for the LR-45 type rating. In order to operate another related aircraft, crewmembers operating under part 91K or part 135 are required to satisfactorily comply with the requirements of the MDR and ODR tables in Appendix 1 and 2. The same requirement should be followed by flight crewmembers operating under part 91.

6.2.3 Application For and Issuance of Type Ratings. Airmen completing pertinent part 61 or part 135 requirements for the issuance of a pilot type rating in accordance with FSB requirements described in this report may apply to the FAA for the LR-45 type rating endorsement. Upon satisfactory completion of required tests, and submission of an application via Integrated Airman Certification and Rating Application (IACRA) or a FAA Form 8710-1 (Airman Certification and/or Rating Application), an authorized designee or qualified ASI may issue the pilot certificate with type rating. The checks must be administered by an authorized designee, or ASI who has been qualified on the specific LR-45 variant.

6.3 Proficiency Checks.

6.3.1 General. Proficiency Checks are administered in accordance with part 61, part 91K, and part 135. A proficiency check in any LR-45 aircraft suffices for the type provided initial qualification, recurrent qualification and differences per MDR and approved ODR tables for that operator are met. These checks must be administered by an authorized check airman or qualified ASI on the specific related aircraft. Satisfactory completion of a proficiency check may be substituted for recurrent flight training as permitted in part 91K and part 135.

Page 14 of 120

Page 15: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

6.3.2 Proficiency Checks for Mixed Fleet Flying. Proficiency Checks for Mixed Fleet Flying will alternate checks each 6 months for PICs and annually for SICs between LR-40/45 and LR-70/75 aircraft. Aircraft differences must be addressed in accordance with the MDR and ODR tables for that operator.

7. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECENCY OF EXPERIENCE

7.1 Recency of Experience. Each related aircraft is addressed separately unless otherwise approved. Recency of experience must include operation and programming of the FMS / G5000 and use of AFCS / Autopilot for departure, enroute, arrival and approaches.

7.1.1 Takeoff and Landing Credit. Takeoffs and Landings performed in one related LR-45 aircraft are equivalent and may be credited to all related aircraft.

7.2 Mixed Fleet Flying Currency. These are shown in MDR / ODR tables.

7.2.1 Level B Currency. When MDR / ODR specifies level B, currency is maintained by operating the related aircraft within the previous 180 days.

7.2.2 Re-Establishing Level B Currency. Level B currency may be re-established by a review of all ODR Level B items identified for the pertinent related aircraft to include Bulletins, Placards, Memos, Limitations, Operating Procedures and Manual Updates prior to operating the related aircraft.

7.3 Level C Currency. When MDR / ODR specifies Level C, currency is maintained by operating / flying the related aircraft through a complete flight cycle (pre-flight thru engine shut-down), including an Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) within the previous 90 days.

7.3.1 Re-Establishing Level C Currency. Level C currency may be re-established by operating the related aircraft, Full Flight Simulator (FFS), or Level 6-7 Flight Training Device (FTD) with a qualified PIC for a minimum of one complete flight cycle (pre-flight thru engine shut-down) including an IAP, completing an approved differences course, completing a type rating practical test, completing any of the following checks (to include an IAP), in the related aircraft, FTD or FFS by an authorized Check Airman, qualified Check Pilot, authorized TCE, Designated Examiner, a person qualified by the Administrator or a qualified ASI: §§ 61.57(d) , 61.58, 91.1065, 91.1069, 135.293, 135.297, 135.299. Section 135.299 check must be in related aircraft in flight.

7.4 Part 142 Instructor Currency. Part 142 Instructors conducting the complete pertinent practical training as outlined in Appendix 4 within the previous 90 days are considered to be current.

8. AIRCRAFT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST

8.1 Regulatory Compliance Checklist (see Appendix 3).

Compliance checklists are provided as an aid to FAA CHDO in identifying those specific rules or policies for which compliance has already been demonstrated to the FAA for aircraft having a particular aircraft type, and variant. The compliance checklist also notes rules or policies not demonstrated to the FSB, which must be demonstrated to CHDOs by operators.

Page 15 of 120

Page 16: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

8.2 Discussion of Specific Compliance Checklist Items. Operational approval information is provided as an aid to CHDOs for identifying specific regulatory compliance.

8.2.1 Forward Observer Seat. LR-45 aircraft do not have a dedicated forward observer seat. No specific aircraft interior passenger seating configuration has been evaluated. A forward facing passenger seat adjacent to the cabin entry door or side facing passenger seat across from the cabin entry door may be acceptable for compliance with § 135.75

8.2.2 Emergency Evacuation. Emergency Evacuation procedures have been demonstrated for LR-45 aircraft and documented on LR Flight Test Report 3930, M45 Emergency Evacuation Demonstration Test dated 16 August 1997. LR-45 aircraft are certificated for a maximum of 9 passenger seats.

8.2.3 Ditching Demonstration. No Ditching Demonstration has been accomplished for the LR-45 aircraft. The airplane is not certified for ditching under § 25.801. Each operator is responsible for their own extended over water equipment and procedures.

8.2.4 Proving and Validation Tests. Proving and validation tests in accordance with § 135.145 are appropriate in accordance with FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 29, Section 3, when the LR-45 aircraft is new to a particular operator. When an operator is currently operating either LR-40/45 or LR-70/75 aircraft and it adds the other related aircraft in the same kind of operation, proving tests are not required.

8.2.5 Electronic Flight Bag (EFB). For LR-70/75 aircraft, three (3) Garmin Display Units each act independently as File Servers with database synchronization. Dual File Server Units are required for paperless operation in accordance with aeronautical information requirements of §§ 91.503 and 135.83. At least one (1) File Server must be available on emergency electrical power. The G5000 system has capabilities of being utilized as an EFB that must be approved by the CHDO.

8.2.5.1 Electronic Checklist. Electronic Checklists were not evaluated. Printed Pilot Checklist are required for compliance with §§ 91.503 and 135.83.

8.2.5.2 Electronic Charts. For LR-70/75 aircraft, the G5000 system is capable of displaying aeronautical charts from either Jeppesen (ChartView) or AeroNav Services (FliteCharts). The charts are displayed in full color with high resolution. Both charts services require a subscription service. ChartView contains geo-referenced information on airport procedures worldwide and the database is revised every 14 days. FliteCharts contain information on airport procedures (approach plates only) for the United States only and the database is updated every 28 days.

ChartView data includes Standard Terminal Arrivals (STAR), Departure Procedures (DP), IAP charts, Airport Diagrams and Chart Notices To Airman (NOTAM) applicable to specific information conveyed on the displayed Jeppesen (ChartView) chart.

Dual redundancy is required for a suitable source of electronic aeronautical information. The Jeppesen (ChartView) electronic charts and enhanced map overlays were not evaluated therefore another suitable source of Enroute Chart information must be available at the pilot station.

Page 16 of 120

Page 17: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

9. FSB SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING DEVICES AND SIMULATORS

9.1 Device and Simulator Characteristics. Device and simulator characteristics are designated in AC 120-40B, Airplane Simulator Qualification and 120-45A, Airplane Flight Training Device Qualification (as amended) or part 60. The acceptability of differences between devices, simulators, and aircraft must be determined for each approved training program. Credit for training, checking and currency in an approved FTD or FFS is allowed in accordance with the Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) and Aircraft Type Rating PTS, Appendix 1 – Airplanes Task vs. Simulation Device Credit, as applicable, except where this report is more restrictive.

9.2 Device Approval. Requests for device approval to be utilized during approved training should be made to the POI / TCPM. The POI / TCPM may approve these devices for that operator if their characteristics clearly meet the established FAA criteria and have been qualified by National Simulator Program (NSP) personnel. NSP criteria for flight devices and simulators are acceptable as published.

10. APPLICATION OF FSB REPORT

10.1 This report becomes effective when approved by the FAA (see Cover Sheet or Record of Revisions page).  10.2 Training, checking and currency for the LR-45 aircraft must be conducted in accordance with all provisions of this report.

10.3 All FAA approved Training Programs must incorporate the latest FAA Approved AFM Procedures, AFM checklists, manufacturer’s recommendations and bulletins, training maneuvers and all provisions of this report.

11. ALTERNATE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE

11.1 Alternate means of compliance to the requirements of this report must be approved by the FSB. If alternate means of compliance is sought, operators must show that the proposed alternate means provides an equivalent level of safety to the provisions of AC 120-53 (as amended) and this FSB report. Analysis, demonstrations, proof of concept testing, differences documentation or other evidence may be required.

11.2 Equivalent Safety - If alternate means of compliance is sought, training program hour reductions, simulator approvals, and device approvals, may be significantly limited and reporting requirements may be increased to ensure equivalent levels of safety. The FAA will generally not consider relief through alternate compliance unless sufficient lead-time has been planned by an operator to allow for any necessary testing and evaluation.

11.3 Interim Programs - In the event unforeseen circumstances make it impossible for an operator to comply with MDR provisions, the operator may seek an interim program approval rather than a permanent alternate compliance method.  Financial arrangements, scheduling adjustments, and similar reasons are not considered “unforeseen circumstances” for the purposes of this provision. Interim program approvals must be approved by the FSB Chair.

Page 17 of 120

Page 18: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 FSB Board Record (LR-45 ONLY)

12.1.1 Background. Learjet Inc. made application for new type design by letter dated 27 January, 1992 for the Learjet 45. The FSB members were; Richard McCleish (Chair), John Wenzel (AFS-800), Robert Hlubin (Wichita FSDO), Bruce Allred (Wichita FSDO), Richard Rowland (Scottsdale FSDO). Learjet plans to design and manufacture major portions of the airframe in Northern Ireland and as much as possible, will use concurrent cooperative certification procedures with the FAA and the Joint Airworthiness Authority (JAA).

The Learjet Model 45 FSB convened 22 September 1997 and a new type rating was established. The FSB attended Flight Safety International in Wichita, KS.

FSB Report Posted - Date 05/10/1998, Revision: Original No other information available.

12.2. FSB Board Record (LR-40 ONLY)

12.2.1 Background. Learjet made application to amend the Learjet 45 type design by increasing the Learjet 45 weights and then creating the Learjet 40 model by reducing the Learjet 45 weights and length. Learjet 40 models are designated by different serial numbers, Learjet 45, SN 2001 thru 4000. The fireproof identification plate designates the aircraft as a Learjet 45 model. There is a small decal at the entry door that designates the model as the Learjet 40.

12.2.2 Board Composition. The Board consisted of the Chair and an ASI current and qualified in the Learjet 45 airplane.

12.2.3 Applicant’s Proposal. The applicant submitted MCR and ODR tables proposed at A/A/A levels.

12.2.4 Tests. As a result of the applicant’s proposal, the FSB conducted a T1 Test (Functional Equivalence) to confirm Level A differences based on AC 120-53.

12.2.5 Test Results. No significant differences were noted in the conduct of the maneuvers. As such the Board accepted the applicant’s proposal.

12.3. FSB Board Record (LR-70/75 ONLY)

12.3.1 Background. Learjet made application to amend the Learjet 45 type certificate design in June 2012. The application included upgrading the Avionics to the Garmin G5000 system, upgrading the engines to TFE-331-40BR, upgrading to larger winglets and an interior redesign.

12.3.2 Board Composition. The Board consisted of the Chair, an Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) Test Pilot, a part 142 TCE, a NSP Inspector and an ASI. All were current and qualified in the Learjet 45 airplane.

12.3.3 Applicant’s Proposal. The applicant submitted application proposing MDR and ODR tables proposing C/C/B levels.

Page 18 of 120

Page 19: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

12.3.4 Tests. As a result of the applicant’s proposal, the FSB conducted T2 Testing (Handling Qualities Comparison) in a LR-45 and LR-75 aircraft at Wichita, Kansas during August 2013. The FSB noted no handling qualities differences and the T2 test passed.

The FSB proceeded to Bombardier Training Center in Dallas, Texas to conduct T3 Test (System Differences Test and Validation of Training and Checking) during August 2013. Upon completion of the differences training, the FSB relocated to Wichita, Kansas to complete the T3 validation and set the training, checking and currency requirements.

12.3.5 Test Results. The FSB determined that level C/C/C differences were required and the MDR and ODR tables were updated in the specific areas.

12.4. Learjet Model 45 History

12.4.1 Learjet 45 / 45XR. In January of 1992, Learjet Inc. made application to the FAA to type certify the Model 45 as a new type design.  Although the Model 45 externally resembles previous Learjet models, it was in fact virtually an all new design. FAA type certification was granted September 1997.

The Learjet Model 45 FSB convened in Wichita, Kansas on September 22, 1997 to evaluate the proposed training, checking and currency requirements for pilots qualifying in the Model 45 aircraft.  It was the opinion of Learjet, Inc. that a new type rating would be required therefore; no other models of the Learjet family were evaluated for training credit. Upon completion of the FSB, the type rating LR-45 was awarded. The first aircraft was delivered January 1998.

In June 2004, Bombardier Learjet introduced as the production line standard, the Learjet 45XR, an upgraded version of the Model 45 aircraft. Upgrades included: higher takeoff weights; faster cruise speeds; and faster time-to-climb rates when compared to original Model 45 configuration. The increase in aircraft performance was the result of upgrading the engines to the TFE731-20BR configuration.

12.4.2 Learjet 40XR. When Learjet made application to amend the Learjet 45 type design in 2004, they also introduced the Learjet 40XR, a shortened fuselage and lighter weight version of the 45XR variant. In the 2006 FSB report, the Kansas City AEG determined that the Learjet 40 and 45 aircraft were functionally equivalent with differences identified at A/A/A.

12.4.3 Learjet 70 / 75. The Learjet 40 and 45 configurations of the Model 45 aircraft are being discontinued and the Learjet 70 and 75 will become the production configurations. In the fourth quarter of 2013, Bombardier Learjet planned to complete certification of the latest Model 45 upgrade. The shortened fuselage and lighter weight version of the latest production configuration will be marketed as the Learjet 70, the full length version as the Learjet 75.

The Learjet 70/75 upgrade features the Garmin G5000 avionics suite, larger winglets and increased engine thrust. The FSB was conducted in August 2013 with the Learjet 70/75 entry into service planned for October 2013.

12.4.4 Marketing Designators Learjet 45, 45XR, 40, 70 and 75 are marketing designators used to differentiate various configurations of the Model 45 aircraft.

Page 19 of 120

Page 20: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

APPENDIX 1

MASTER DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS TABLE

TYPE RATING:LEARJET 45

FROM AIRCRAFT

Learjet 45 Learjet 40 Learjet 75 Learjet 70

TO

AIRCRAFT

Learjet 45 ----- A/A/A C/C/C C/C/C

Learjet 40 A/A/A ----- C/C/C C/C/C

Learjet 75 C/C/C C/C/C ----- A/A/A

Learjet 70 C/C/C C/C/C A/A/A -----

Learjet 45 to Learjet 40 Findings from Original 03/03/2006 FSB Report – A/A/ALearjet 40 to Learjet 45 Findings from Original 03/03/2006 FSB Report – A/A/A

Page 20 of 120

Page 21: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

APPENDIX 2

ACCEPTABLE OPERATOR DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS TABLES

Annex A - ODR Definitions -Training Levels

DefinitionsODR

Training Level

“HO” = Handout A“S/T” = Slide/Tape presentations“TCBI” = Tutorial Computer Based Instruction“SU” = Stand-up Instructors“VT” = Video Tapes

B

“ICBT” = Interactive Computer Based Training“CSS” = Cockpit System Simulators“CPT” = Cockpit Procedures Trainers“PTT” = Part Task Trainers“FTD 2-5” = Flight Training Devices (level 2-5)

C

“FTD 6-7” = Flight training devices (level 6-7)“FFS A-B” = Full Flight Simulators (level A or B ) D

“FFS C-D” = Full Flight Simulators (level C or D)“ACFT” = Aircraft E

NOTES

An “X” in an ODR table column indicates that any of the training methods listed for that level are acceptable. If a specific instruction method is specified in an ODR table column, it must be used.

“B” in the Checking column of the ODR tables indicates a “task” or “systems” check required as specified in “Level B Checking” section found in the Common Procedures Document.

Garmin Integrated Procedures Trainer (IPT) referred as the Garmin Kiosk by Garmin and Learjet is considered a Cockpit System Simulator “CSS”.

Page 21 of 120

Page 22: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex B – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 40

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Weights Max Ramp Weight reduced to 21,250 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight reduced to 21,000 lbs.Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,000 lbs.

No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length Reduced 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length reduction requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length reduction results in smaller turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity reduction. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Removal of 2 gaspers.Reduction in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Reduction in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

23Comm

Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation.

NoNo HO A A

27Flight Controls

Reduced length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

28Fuel

Fuel System difference limited to a reduction in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Reductions in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

31Indicating Recording Systems

CAS and CWP messages added for Cabin Altitude problem awareness.L R ECS CAS messages added for bleed air system failures.Note; These changes will be introduced M45 (S/N 001 to 2000) aircraft.

No No HO A A

Page 22 of 120

Page 23: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

32Landing Gear

Shorter emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

33Lights

Interior lights are LED-based, no operational impact. No No HO A A

34Navigation

EGPWS, TCAS 2000 and ELT are installation standards, no operational differences from optional (STC) installations.

No No HO A A

35Oxygen

5 dual masks drop (was 6).Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

52Doors

Fuel quantity reduction relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length reduction requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Removal of three windows requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 23 of 120

Page 24: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex C – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 75

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout modified to integrate new Garmin 5000 avionics suite and to enhance aesthetics.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck control panels.No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Larger wingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin updatedNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Weights and dimensions unchangedNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel resized and reconfigured.L & R BLEED, PACK, HI FLOW and EMERG PRESS switches moved to new PAX/OXY PRESS panel on pedestal.APU BLEED switch move to APU panel on pedestal.

NoNorm

Abnorm Emer

HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page controlled via GTCs No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) replaced by Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as Honeywell Primus 1000 suite except FLC versus Speed. No Norm TCBI,

SU B B

22 AFCS New Flight Director Takeoff Mode displayed on PFD No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS New autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost No No HO A A

Page 24 of 120

Page 25: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

22 AFCS Flight Director button now engages as well as disengages flight director No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel has up/down wheel for pitch and speed reference No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel – ASEL knob now called ALT No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic differs.No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers 1 and 2 (GTC) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B C

23 Comm Audio panels functionality selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers (GTC 1 and 2) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B C

23 Comm Active and standby communication frequency displayed on Pilot and Copilot DU1 and DU3 controlled by GTCs or GCU No Norm HO

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B C

23 Comm Control panel removed for Clearance Delivery Head radio. New functionality provided by CLR DLY SW/IND and/or EMER COM SW/IND.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) (future development) --- ---

23 Comm Optional HF panel removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button removed. Controlled at GTC 1 and GTC 2.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from audio panels to GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Interphone/Intercom functionality moved from audio panels to GTCs and additional intercom with pass compartment.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from audio panels to GTCs accessed via GTC radio bars.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from audio panels to pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeledL OXY MIC and R OXY MIC

NoNorm

AbnormEmer

HO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND removed, functionality accomplished with the clearance delivery button.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Optional SatCom handset removed. SatCom functionality controlled through GTC 1 and 2. No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC recorder capable of recording and playback of clearances. No Norm HO A A

Page 25 of 120

Page 26: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from Pilot Switch Panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT SW/IND changed to latched toggle switch for STBY INSTR No Norm,

Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Larger 28 Amp-Hour lead acid emergency battery including 300W heater No No HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/INDNo No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via GTCs and displayed on DU 2 No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) with GPS. ELT switch located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications removed. No No HO A A

26 Fire Fire test performed at GTCs versus rotary test switch No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pitch Disconnect handle moved and color changed. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

ELEV DISC handle relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND located to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from center switch panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2 No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Three LCD Display Units installed with select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75

COMPLIANCE METHOD

Page 26 of 120

Page 27: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________ TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all synoptics differ in presentation No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No Norm Abnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Selectable Synthetic Vision System (SVS) on pilot and copilot DUs No Norm TCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

System synoptics changed in presentationNo Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Optional flight data recorder differs.

(future provision)No ---

31Indicating/Recording

Clock functions and indications differ.No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indication selectable at PFD.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel removed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Garmin Stall Warning indications differNo Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall Warning test moved to GTC 1 and 2 and indications during test differ. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

New green bar indication on airspeed indicator represents approach reference speed. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

No optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS).Safe Taxi and optional Enhanced Safe Taxi available.

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Third party provided electronic checklist displayed on MFD and selected at touch screen controllers. Operator Responsibility (future provision)

No ---

31Indicating/Recording

All DUs reversion controls on pilots and copilot’s glareshield removed. Functionality now controlled by DU REVERSION/DIM panel on pedestal

No Abnorm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

ADC and AHRS reversion knobs removed, functionally now controlled by DU softkeys. No Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs color logic changed. No No HO A A

Page 27 of 120

Page 28: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from an arc to a tape.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display availableNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPA now FPM (Flight Path Marker). Speed carat indication removed. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from co-pilot switch panel to center switch panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear handle moved from GEAR/HYD panel to copilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear position indications now EICAS indications No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD and HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights External and wing inspection light control; no smoking/belts; and EMER LTS switches moved from center switch panel to new overhead light switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Dimming control panels on pedestal for GTCs, DUs, STBY INSTR and SW/IND No No HO A A

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav source, course and bearing pointers controlled by DU soft key selection. No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s Display Control panels replaced by DU softkeys and GTCs. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Garmin integrated AHRS system replaces Honeywell equipment. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Navigation radios controlled and displayed at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Navigation active and standby frequencies displayed on PFDs No No HO A A

34 Navigation ADC test removed, now a BIT test.No Norm HO A A

Page 28 of 120

Page 29: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Electronic Standby Instrument System installed (ESIS) Four standby indications: A/S; ALT; ATT; and HDG.ESIS capable of ILS guidance.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source and bearing pointers selected via DU softkeys. Course controlled via Garmin Mode Controller (GMC)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder with Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out (future provision) selected and displayed at GTCs.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Transponder automatic - ground or altitude.No No HO A A

34 Navigation Lightning detection standard equipment and controlled by GTC 1 and 2 No Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation New weather radar selected at GTCs. No separate control panel. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS CDUs removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation PFD inset map available to display traffic and navigation map controlled by PFD softkeys. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS… GPS navigation source only, no other GNSS constellations. No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation FMS…. WAAS/LPV standard equipment was optional on base aircraft. No EGNOS capability.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Reactive windshearNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation MFD auto zoomNo Norm HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick removed, functionally available at GTCs No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Standard takeoff and landing (TOLD) database (future provision) No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Nav to Nav transfer available for VOR/ILS approaches No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C B

34 Navigation TCAS II Resolution Advisory(RA) indications differ No No HO A A

34 Navigation Garmin’s TAWS versus Honeywell’s EGPWS No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS panel removed. Functionality and selection now at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

35 Oxygen Oxygen quantity indications differ.No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75

COMPLIANCE METHOD

Page 29 of 120

Page 30: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________ TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

35 Oxygen PAX OXYGEN panel moved from copilot switch panel to pedestal and relabeled PAX OXY/PRESS

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

Optional Wi-FiIridium out No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Electronic flight charts via subscriptionAOPA airport directory available. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

46 Information Systems

Graphical maps including geopolitical boundary, land mass and airspace boundaries. No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

XM weather available through subscriptionNo Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

International weather available through subscription(future provision)

No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

SD card slots installed on each DU to facilitate loading of data bases No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

CPDLC available

(future provision)No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

49APU

APU control panel relocated on pedestal and APU BLEED SW/IND relocated to APU panel

No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE731-40-BR engine mod -Increased thrustNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 30 of 120

Page 31: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex D – ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 70

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout modified to integrate new Garmin 5000 avionics suite and to enhance aesthetics.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck control panels.No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Larger wingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin updatedNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Maximum Zero Fuel Weight reduced to 16,000 lbs. No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Overall length reduced 23.55 inches.No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length reduction requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length reduction results in smaller turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect usable quantity reduction. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Removal of 2 gaspers.Reduction in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Reduction in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel resized and reconfigured.L & R BLEED, PACK, HI FLOW and EMERG PRESS switches moved to new PAX/OXY PRESS panel on pedestal.APU BLEED switch move to APU panel on pedestal.

NoNorm

Abnorm Emer

HO A A

Page 31 of 120

Page 32: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page controlled via GTCs No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) replaced by Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as Honeywell Primus 1000 suite except FLC versus Speed. No Norm TCBI,

SU B B

22 AFCS New Flight Director Takeoff Mode displayed on PFD No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS New autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Director button now engages as well as disengages flight director No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel has up/down wheel for pitch and speed reference No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel – ASEL knob now called ALT No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic differs.No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. NO NO HO A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers 1 and 2 (GTC) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B C

23 Comm Audio panels functionality selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers (GTC 1 and 2) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and standby communication frequency displayed on Pilot and Copilot DU1 and DU3 controlled by GTCs or GCU No Norm HO

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Control panel removed for Clearance Delivery Head radio. New functionality provided by CLR DLY SW/IND and/or EMER COM SW/IND.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) (future development) --- ---

23 Comm Optional HF panel removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button removed. Controlled at GTC 1 and GTC 2.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from audio panels to GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 32 of 120

Page 33: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

23 Comm Interphone/Intercom functionality moved from audio panels to GTCs and additional intercom with pass compartment.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from audio panels to GTCs accessed via GTC radio bars.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from audio panels to pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeledL OXY MIC and R OXY MIC

NoNorm

AbnormEmer

HO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND removed, functionality accomplished with the clearance delivery button.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Optional SatCom handset removed. SatCom functionality controlled through GTC 1 and 2. No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC recorder capable of recording and playback of clearances. No Norm HO A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from Pilot Switch Panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT SW/IND changed to latched toggle switch for STBY INSTR No Norm,

Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Larger 28 Amp-Hour lead acid emergency battery including 300W heater No No HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/INDNo No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via GTCs and displayed on DU 2 No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) with GPS. ELT switch located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications removed. No No HO A A

26 Fire Fire test performed at GTCs versus rotary test switch No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

Reduced length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pitch Disconnect handle moved and color changed. No No HO A A

Page 33 of 120

Page 34: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

ELEV DISC handle relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND located to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

28 Fuel Fuel System difference limited to a reduction in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Reductions in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from center switch panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2 No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Three LCD Display Units installed with select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No Norm Abnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Selectable Synthetic Vision System (SVS) on Pilot and copilot DUs No Norm TCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

System synoptics changed in presentationNo Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Optional flight data recorder differs.

(future provision)No ---

31Indicating/Recording

Clock functions and indications differ.No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indication selectable at PFD.No No HO A A

Page 34 of 120

Page 35: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel removed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Garmin Stall Warning indications differNo Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall Warning test moved to GTC 1 and 2 and indications during test differ. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

New green bar indication on airspeed indicator represents approach reference speed. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

No optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS).Safe Taxi and optional Enhanced Safe Taxi available.

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Third party provided electronic checklist displayed on MFD and selected at touch screen controllers. Operator Responsibility (future provision)

No ---

31Indicating/Recording

All DUs reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield removed. Functionality now controlled by DU REVERSION/DIM panel on pedestal

No Abnorm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

ADC and AHRS reversion knobs removed, functionally now controlled by DU softkeys. No Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from an arc to a tape.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display availableNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPA now FPM (Flight Path Marker). Speed carat indication removed. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

32Landing Gear

Shorter emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from co-pilot switch panel to center switch panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear handle moved from GEAR/HYD panel to copilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 35 of 120

Page 36: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

32Landing Gear

Landing gear position indications now EICAS indications No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD and HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights External and wing inspection light control; no smoking/belts; and EMER LTS switches moved from center switch panel to new overhead light switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Dimming control panels on pedestal for GTCs, DUs, STBY INSTR and SW/IND No No HO A A

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav source, course and bearing pointers controlled by DU soft key selection. No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s Display Control panels replaced by DU softkeys and GTCs. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Garmin integrated AHRS system replaces Honeywell equipment. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Navigation radios controlled and displayed at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Navigation active and standby frequencies displayed on PFDs No No HO A A

34 Navigation ADC test removed, now a BIT test.No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Electronic Standby Instrument System installed (ESIS) Four standby indications: A/S; ALT; ATT; and HDG.ESIS capable of ILS guidance.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source and bearing pointers selected via DU softkeys. Course controlled via Garmin Mode Controller (GMC)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder with Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out (future provision) selected and displayed at GTCs.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Transponder automatic - ground or altitude.No No HO A A

34 Navigation Lightning detection standard equipment and controlled by GTC 1 and 2 No Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation New weather radar selected at GTCs. No separate control panel. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS CDUs removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

Page 36 of 120

Page 37: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation PFD inset map available to display traffic and navigation map controlled by PFD softkeys. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS… GPS navigation source only, no other GNSS constellations. No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation FMS…. WAAS/LPV standard equipment was optional on base aircraft.No EGNOS capability.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Reactive windshearNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation MFD auto zoomNo Norm HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick removed, functionally available at GTCs No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Standard takeoff and landing (TOLD) database(future provision)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Nav to Nav transfer available for VOR/ILS approaches No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation TCAS II Resolution Advisory(RA) indications differ No No HO A A

34 Navigation Garmin’s TAWS versus Honeywell’s EGPWS No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS panel removed. Functionality and selection now at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

35 Oxygen 5 dual masks drop (was 6).Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

35 Oxygen Oxygen quantity indications differ.No No HO A A

35 Oxygen PAX OXYGEN panel moved from copilot switch panel to pedestal and relabeled PAX OXY/PRESS

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

Optional Wi-FiIridium out No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Electronic flight charts via subscriptionAOPA airport directory available. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

46 Information Systems

Graphical maps including geopolitical boundary, land mass and airspace boundaries. No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

XM weather available through subscriptionNo Norm HO A A

Page 37 of 120

Page 38: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

46 Information Systems

International weather available through subscription(future provision)

No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

SD card slots installed on each DU to facilitate loading of data bases No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

CPDLC available

(future provision)No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

49APU

APU control panel relocated on pedestal and APU BLEED SW/IND relocated to APU panel

No No HO A A

52 Doors Quantity reduction relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length reduction requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Removal of three windows requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE731-40-BR engine mod -Increased thrustNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 38 of 120

Page 39: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex E – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 45

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Weights Max Ramp Weight increased to 21,750 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight increased to21,500 lbs.Maximum Zero Fuel Weight increased to 16,500 lbs.

No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length increased 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length increased requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length increase results in bigger turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity increase. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Addition of 2 gaspers.Increase in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Increase in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

23Communications

Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

27Flight Controls

Increased length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

28Fuel

Fuel System difference limited to an increase in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Increase in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

Page 39 of 120

Page 40: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating Recording Systems

CAS and CWP messages added for Cabin Altitude problem awareness.L R ECS CAS messages added for bleed air system failures.Note; These changes will be introduced to M45 (S/N 001 to 2000) aircraft also.

No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Longer emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

34Navigation

EGPWS, TCAS 2000 and ELT are installation standards, no operational differences from optional (STC) installations.

No No HO A A

35Oxygen

6 dual masks drop (was 5)Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

52Doors

Fuel quantity increase relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length increase requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Additional three windows require no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 40 of 120

Page 41: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex F – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 75

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout modified to integrate new Garmin 5000 avionics suite and to enhance aesthetics.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck control panels.No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Larger wingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin updatedNo No HO A A

Weights Max Ramp Weight increased to 21,750 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight increased to 21,500 lbs.Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,000 lbs.

No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length increased 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length increased requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and taxiing

Fuselage length increase results in bigger turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity increase. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Addition of 2 gaspers.Increase in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Increase in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel resized and reconfigured.L & R BLEED, PACK, HI FLOW and EMERG PRESS switches moved to new PAX/OXY PRESS panel on pedestal.APU BLEED switch move to APU panel on pedestal.

NoNorm

Abnorm Emer

HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75

COMPLIANCE METHOD

Page 41 of 120

Page 42: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________ TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page controlled via GTCs No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) replaced by Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as Honeywell Primus 1000 suite except FLC versus Speed. No Norm TCBI,

SU B B

22 AFCS New Flight Director Takeoff Mode displayed on PFD No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS New autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Director button now engages as well as disengages flight director No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel has up/down wheel for pitch and speed reference No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel – ASEL knob now called ALT No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic differs.No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers 1 and 2 (GTC) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD2-5

B C

23 Comm Audio panels functionality selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers (GTC 1 and 2) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

23 Comm Active and standby Comm frequency displayed on Pilot and Copilot DU1 and DU3 controlled by GTCs or GCU No Norm HO

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Control panel removed for Clearance Delivery Head radio. New functionality provided by CLR DLY SW/IND and/or EMER COM SW/IND.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2)(future provision)

--- ---

23 Comm Optional HF panel removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button removed. Controlled at GTC 1 and GTC 2.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

Page 42 of 120

Page 43: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from audio panels to GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Interphone/Intercom functionality moved from audio panels to GTCs and additional intercom with pass compartment.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from audio panels to GTCs accessed via GTC radio bars.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from audio panels to pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeledL OXY MIC and R OXY MIC

NoNorm

AbnormEmer

HO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND removed, functionality accomplished with the clearance delivery button.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Optional SatCom handset removed. SatCom functionality controlled through GTC 1 and 2. No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC recorder capable of recording and playback of clearances. No Norm HO A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from Pilot Switch Panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT SW/IND changed to latched toggle switch for STBY INSTR No Norm,

Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Larger 28 Amp-Hour lead acid emergency battery including 300W heater No No HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/INDNo No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via GTCs and displayed on DU 2 No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) with GPS. ELT switch located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications removed. No No HO A A

26 Fire Fire test performed at GTCs versus rotary test switch No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

Increased length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pitch Disconnect handle moved and color changed. No No HO A A

Page 43 of 120

Page 44: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

ELEV DISC handle relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND located to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

28Fuel

Fuel System difference limited to an increase in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Increase in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from center switch panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2 No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Three LCD Display Units installed with select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all synoptics differ in presentation No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No Norm Abnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Selectable Synthetic Vision System (SVS) on Pilot and copilot DUs No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

System synoptics changed in presentationNo Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Optional flight data recorder differs.

(Future provision)No ---

31Indicating/Recording

Clock functions and indications differ.No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indication selectable at PFD.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel removed. No No HO A A

Page 44 of 120

Page 45: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Garmin Stall Warning indications differNo Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall Warning test moved to GTC 1 and 2 and indications during test differ. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

New green bar indication on airspeed indicator represents approach reference speed. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

No optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS).Safe Taxi and optional Enhanced Safe Taxi available.

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Third party provided electronic checklist displayed on MFD and selected at touch screen controllers. Operator Responsibility (future provision)

No ---

31Indicating/Recording

All DUs reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield removed. Functionality now controlled by DU REVERSION/DIM panel on pedestal

No Abnorm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

ADC and AHRS reversion knobs removed, functionally now controlled by DU softkeys. No Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from an arc to a tape.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display availableNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPA now FPM (Flight Path Marker). Speed carat indication removed. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

32Landing Gear

Longer emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from co-pilot switch panel to center switch panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear handle moved from GEAR/HYD panel to copilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear position indications now EICAS indications No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

Page 45 of 120

Page 46: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

32Landing Gear

Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD and HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights External and wing inspection light control; no smoking/belts; and EMER LTS switches moved from center switch panel to new overhead light switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Dimming control panels on pedestal for GTCs, DUs, STBY INSTR and SW/IND No No HO A A

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav source, course and bearing pointers controlled by DU soft key selection. No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s Display Control panels replaced by DU softkeys and GTCs. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Garmin integrated AHRS system replaces Honeywell equipment. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Navigation radios controlled and displayed at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Navigation active and standby frequencies displayed on PFDs No No HO A A

34 Navigation ADC test removed, now a BIT test.No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Electronic Standby Instrument System installed (ESIS) Four standby indications: A/S; ALT; ATT; and HDG.ESIS capable of ILS guidance.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source and bearing pointers selected via DU softkeys. Course controlled via Garmin Mode Controller (GMC)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder with Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out (Future Provision) selected and displayed at GTCs.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Transponder automatic - ground or altitude.No No HO A A

34 Navigation Lightning detection standard equipment and controlled by GTC 1 and 2 No Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation New weather radar selected at GTCs. No separate control panel. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS CDUs removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation PFD inset map available to display traffic and navigation map controlled by PFD softkeys. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS… GPS navigation source only, no other GNSS constellations. No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation FMS…. WAAS/LPV standard equipment was optional on base aircraft. No EGNOS capability.

No Norm HO A A

Page 46 of 120

Page 47: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Reactive windshearNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation MFD auto zoomNo Norm HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick removed, functionally available at GTCs No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Standard takeoff and landing (TOLD) database(future provision)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Nav to Nav transfer available for VOR/ILS approaches No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C B

34 Navigation TCAS II Resolution Advisory(RA) indications differ No No HO A A

34 Navigation Garmin’s TAWS versus Honeywell’s EGPWS No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS panel removed. Functionality and selection now at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

35 Oxygen 6 dual masks drop (was 5)Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

35 Oxygen Oxygen quantity indications differ.No No HO A A

35 Oxygen PAX OXYGEN panel moved from copilot switch panel to pedestal and relabeled PAX OXY/PRESS

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

Optional Wi-FiIridium out No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Electronic flight charts via subscriptionAOPA airport directory available. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

46 Information Systems

Graphical maps including geopolitical boundary, land mass and airspace boundaries. No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

XM weather available through subscriptionNo Norm HO A A

46 InformationSystems

International weather available through subscription(future provision)

No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

SD card slots installed on each DU to facilitate loading of data bases No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

CPDLC available

(future provision)No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 47 of 120

Page 48: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

49APU

APU control panel relocated on pedestal and APU BLEED SW/IND relocated to APU panel

No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length increase requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Additional three windows require no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE731-40-BR engine mod -Increased thrustNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers

No Changes No No HO A A

Page 48 of 120

Page 49: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex G – ODR Table: Learjet 40 to Learjet 70

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout modified to integrate new Garmin 5000 avionics suite and to enhance aesthetics.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck control panels.No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Larger wingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin updatedNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Max Ramp Weight increased to 21,750 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight increased to 21,500 lbs. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel resized and reconfigured.L & R BLEED, PACK, HI FLOW and EMERG PRESS switches moved to new PAX/OXY PRESS panel on pedestal.APU BLEED switch move to APU panel on pedestal.

NoNorm

Abnorm Emer

HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page controlled via GTCs No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) replaced by Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as Honeywell Primus 1000 suite except FLC versus Speed. No Norm TCBI,

SU B B

22 AFCS New Flight Director Takeoff Mode displayed on PFD No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS New autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost No No HO A A

22 AFCS Flight Director button now engages as well as disengages flight director No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel has up/down wheel for pitch and speed reference No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin mode control panel – ASEL knob now called ALT No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic differs. No Norm HO A A

Page 49 of 120

Page 50: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AbnormEmer

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers 1 and 2 (GTC) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

23 Comm Audio panels functionality selected and displayed at Garmin Touch Screens Controllers (GTC 1 and 2) No

NormAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and standby communication frequency displayed on Pilot and Copilot DU1 and DU3 controlled by GTCs or GCU No Norm HO

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Control panel removed for Clearance Delivery Head radio. New functionality provided by CLR DLY SW/IND and/or EMER COM SW/IND.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2)(future provision)

--- ---

23 Comm Optional HF panel removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button removed. Controlled at GTC 1 and GTC 2.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from audio panels to GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Interphone/Intercom functionality moved from audio panels to GTCs and additional intercom with pass compartment.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from audio panels to GTCs accessed via GTC radio bars.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from audio panels to pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeledL OXY MIC and R OXY MIC

NoNorm

AbnormEmer

HO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND removed, functionality accomplished with the clearance delivery button.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Optional SatCom handset removed. SatCom functionality controlled through GTC 1 and 2. No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC recorder capable of recording and playback of clearances. No Norm HO A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from Pilot Switch Panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT SW/IND changed to latched toggle switch for STBY INSTR No Norm,

Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Larger 28 Amp-Hour lead acid emergency battery including 300W heater No No HO A A

Page 50 of 120

Page 51: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/INDNo No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via GTCs and displayed on DU 2 No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) with GPS. ELT switch located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels located on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications removed. No No HO A A

26 Fire Fire test performed at GTCs versus rotary test switch No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pitch Disconnect handle moved and color changed. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

ELEV DISC handle relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND located to FLIGHT CONTROL panel on pedestal. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from center switch panel to pedestal. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2 No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Three LCD Display Units installed with select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No Norm Abnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Selectable Synthetic Vision System (SVS) on Pilot and copilot DUs No Norm TCBI,

SU B A

Page 51 of 120

Page 52: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

System synoptics changed in presentationNo Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Optional flight data recorder differs.

(future provision)--- ---

31Indicating/Recording

Clock functions and indications differ.No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indication selectable at PFD.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel removed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Garmin Stall Warning indications differNo Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall Warning test moved to GTC 1 and 2 and indications during test differ. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

New green bar indication on airspeed indicator represents approach reference speed. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

No optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS).Safe Taxi and optional Enhanced Safe Taxi available.

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Third party provided electronic checklist displayed on MFD and selected at touch screen controllers. Operator Responsibility (future provision)

--- ---

31Indicating/Recording

All DUs reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield removed. Functionality now controlled by DU REVERSION/DIM panel on pedestal

No Abnorm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

ADC and AHRS reversion knobs removed, functionally now controlled by DU softkeys. No Abnorm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from an arc to a tape.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display availableNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPA now FPM (Flight Path Marker). Speed carat indication removed. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from co-pilot switch panel to center switch panel

No No HO A A

Page 52 of 120

Page 53: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

32Landing Gear

Landing gear handle moved from GEAR/HYD panel to copilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test moved from rotary switch to GTC 1 and 2. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Landing gear position indications now EICAS indications No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD and HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights External and wing inspection light control; no smoking/belts; and EMER LTS switches moved from center switch panel to new overhead light switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Dimming control panels on pedestal for GTCs, DUs, STBY INSTR and SW/IND No No HO A A

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav source, course and bearing pointers controlled by DU soft key selection. No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s Display Control panels replaced by DU softkeys and GTCs. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Garmin integrated AHRS system replaces Honeywell equipment. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Navigation radios controlled and displayed at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Navigation active and standby frequencies displayed on PFDs No No HO A A

34 Navigation ADC test removed, now a BIT test.No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Electronic Standby Instrument System installed (ESIS) Four standby indications: A/S; ALT; ATT; and HDG.ESIS capable of ILS guidance.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source and bearing pointers selected via DU softkeys. Course controlled via Garmin Mode Controller (GMC)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

Page 53 of 120

Page 54: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFF DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Mode S transponder with Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out (Future Provision) selected and displayed at GTCs.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Transponder automatic - ground or altitude.No No HO A A

34 Navigation Lightning detection standard equipment and controlled by GTC 1 and 2 No Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation New weather radar selected at GTCs. No separate control panel. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS CDUs removed, functionality and control at GTC1 and 2 No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation PFD inset map available to display traffic and navigation map controlled by PFD softkeys. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation FMS… GPS navigation source only, no other GNSS constellations. No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation FMS…. WAAS/LPV standard equipment was optional on base aircraft.No EGNOS capability.

No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Reactive windshearNo Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation MFD auto zoomNo Norm HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick removed, functionally available at GTCs No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Standard takeoff and landing (TOLD) database(future provision)

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Nav to Nav transfer available for VOR/ILS approaches No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C B

34 Navigation TCAS II Resolution Advisory(RA) indications differ No No HO A A

34 Navigation Garmin’s TAWS versus Honeywell’s EGPWS No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS panel removed. Functionality and selection now at GTCs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

35 Oxygen Oxygen quantity indications differ.No No HO A A

35 Oxygen PAX OXYGEN panel moved from copilot switch panel to pedestal and relabeled PAX OXY/PRESS

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

Optional Wi-FiIridium out No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Electronic flight charts via subscriptionAOPA airport directory available. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 54 of 120

Page 55: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFF DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

46 Information Systems

Graphical maps including geopolitical boundary, land mass and airspace boundaries. No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

XM weather available through subscriptionNo Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

International weather available through subscription(future provision)

No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

SD card slots installed on each DU to facilitate loading of data bases No Norm HO A A

46 Information Systems

CPDLC available

(future provision)No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

49APU

APU control panel relocated on pedestal and APU BLEED SW/IND relocated to APU panel

No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE731-40-BR engine mod -Increased thrustNo No HO A A

DIFF DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 55 of 120

Page 56: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex H – Learjet 75 to Learjet 70

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Dimensions Overall Length Reduced 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length reduction requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length reduction results in smaller turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity reduction. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Removal of 2 gaspers.Reduction in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Reduction in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

23Comm

Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Reduced length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

28 Fuel Fuel System difference limited to a reduction in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Reductions in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Shorter emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

33Lights

Interior lights are LED-based, no operational impact. No No HO A A

34Navigation

EGPWS, TCAS 2000 and ELT are installation standards, no operational differences from optional (STC) installations.

No No HO A A

Page 56 of 120

Page 57: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

35 Oxygen 5 dual masks drop (was 6).Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

52 Doors Fuel quantity reduction relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length reduction requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Removal of three windows requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 57 of 120

Page 58: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex I – ODR Table: Learjet 75 to Learjet 45

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout differs from Learjet 75 (Garmin) to accommodate Honeywell Primus 1000 suite.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck panelsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Smaller WingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin differsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Dimensions unchangedNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL panel resized and reconfigured. No No HO A A

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel configuration.PAX/OXY PRESS panel relocated.APU BLEED switch located on Pressurization panelL/R BLEED, EMER PRESS, PACK, HIFLOW switches located on lower instrument panel

No No HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page accessed with DU bezel keys and format different

No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) replaced by Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as G5000 except Speed versus FLC. No Takeoff Mode (TO) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

22 AFCS Autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost (Manufacturer differs, operation the same)

No No HO A A

22 AFCS FD button only disengages flight director. It does not engage the flight director. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS No UP/DOWN wheel on FGC panel.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 58 of 120

Page 59: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

22 AFCS FGC panel – ALT knob now called ASELNo No HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic is differentNo

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Radio Management Units (RMU) on instrument panel.

No NormEmer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Audio Management functionality selected on separate audio control panel (ACP) located on instrument panel and selections displayed on RMUs

No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and Standby COM frequencies displayed only on RMUs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-B Out.No Norm HO A A

23 Comm CLR DLY switch functionality controlled by Radio Control Hot Bus switch on Clearance Delivery Head panel located on upper pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-C and CPDLC (VDL Mode 2) No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC HF radio (optional) tuning functionality and control on HF radio panel on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button located on pedestal No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Intercom functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm L/R Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from pilot and copilot switch panels to ACPs and relabeled PAX OXY/AUTO No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND added.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional Satellite Phone Handset on pedestalNo Norm HO A A

23 Comm No record and playback of clearances capability No No HO A A

23 Comm EMER COM switch functionality differsNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from pedestal to Pilot Switch Panel. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT switch for STBY INSTR changed to SW/IND No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

Page 59 of 120

Page 60: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

24 Electrics 27 or 38 Amp-Hour NiCad or 28 Amp-Hour lead acid batteries are available. No battery heater.

No Abnorm Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/IND located on Co-Pilot’s sidewall No No HO A A

24 Electrics Circuit breaker panel (CBP), CB location on panels reassigned. No No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys and different format No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) does not have GPS. ELT switch panel and indicator light located on separate panel on pedestal.

No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels relocated on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications installed No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

26 Fire Fire test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers different

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality on rotary test knob located on SYS TEST/RESET panel on throttle quadrant.

No Abnorm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PITCH TRIM/RUDDER TRIM panel relocated on pedestal No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND relocated to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pilot’s and copilot’s RUD PEDAL switches relocated on pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeled RUDDER PEDAL

No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from pedestal to center switch panel. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

Anti-Ice system test accomplished on SYS TEST/RESET rotary test knob on pedestal No No TCBI,

SU A A

Page 60 of 120

Page 61: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Four CRT displays select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Synthetic Vision System (SVS)No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Chronometer/clock installed at both the pilot and copilot position. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indications located on optional stand-alone AOA gauge on instrument panel

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel installed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Honeywell Stall Warning system (No vane change) PFD indications differ in presentation No

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall system test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal. PFD test indications different

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Green Circle Ratio presented on airspeed indicator No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Landing gear position indications moved from EICAS to GEAR/HYD panel No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS) available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

(Optional) Electronic Checklist selected for display on MFD with MFD bezel keys. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

DU REVERSION/DIM panel moved to pilot switch panel and labeled REVERSION - includes ADC/AHRS/ICSG reversion switches

NoAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

DU2 and DU3 reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield. No Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs, color logic changed. No No HO A A

Page 61 of 120

Page 62: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from a tape to an arc.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display not available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPV now FPA (Flight Path Angle) and generated by the Universal FMS. Includes speed carat indication

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Database management accomplished through separate Data Transfer Unit No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from center switch panel to co-pilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing Gear handle moved from Co-Pilot’s switch panel to GEAR/HYD panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test accomplished with rotary test knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

No Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD or HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights Exterior light control; no smoking/belts; and Emergency light switches moved from overhead light switch panel to center switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Lights test accomplished with rotary knob on pedestal. Also runs audio test. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Some of the pilot’s and copilot’s Garmin’s DU softkeys and GTCs functions replaced by Pilot/Co-Pilot’s PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation Honeywell’s AHRS replaces Garmin’s integrated AHRS system No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s PFD display options controlled by PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Tuning of Navigation radios via RMUs. Audio portion of Nav radios controlled via Audio control panels located on pilot and copilot instrument panels.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

34 Navigation No automatic reversion of ADCs during malfunctions. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation ADC test added, not a BIT test. Test completed with rotary test switch located on pedestal.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Traditional round gauges replace Integrated Electronic Standby (IESI) for Airspeed, Attitude and Altitude. Standby navigation accomplished on RMU.

No AbnormEmer

TCBI,SU B B

Page 62 of 120

Page 63: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source, Course and bearing pointers controlled via Pilot/Co-Pilot PFD display Controllers located on glareshield

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder without Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

34 Navigation Transponder, no auto select function for ground and airborne ops. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Different weather radar with panel located on pedestal. No lightning or turbulence detection.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS CDUs located on pedestal. Operation and functionality different No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C B

34 Navigation No PFD insert map to display traffic or navigation. No No HO A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS uses GPS, VOR and DME/DME capability. (Garmin uses GPS and SBAS WAAS only)

No NormAbnorm HO A A

34 Navigation WAAS/LPV optional equipment on Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation No reactive wind shear detection and guidance. No No HO A A

34 Navigation No MFD Auto-ZoomNo No HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick provides FMS position input and control of some MFD displays No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Optional Takeoff and Landing (TOLD) data base housed in Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different

No No TCBI,SU B A

34 Navigation No Nav to Nav transfer for VOR/ILS approaches No No TCBI,

SU C B

34 Navigation ACSS TCAS II (previously Garmin). PFD indications and guidance different No Abnorm

Emer HO A A

34 Navigation Honeywell’s GPWS (previously Garmin TAWS-A). PFD/MFD indications different No Normal

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS control panel with G/S, FLAP, STEEP APPR and TERR override switched located on throttle quadrant

GPWS test on rotary test switch replaces TAWS test on System Test page of GT

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU B A

35 Oxygen Oxygen synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys. Format and information displayed is different.

No Norm HO A A

Page 63 of 120

Page 64: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

35 Oxygen PAX OXY/PRESS panel relocated on pedestal moved to copilot switch panel and relabeled PAX OXYGEN

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

No Wi-Fi Iridium out. Maintenance data accessed with laptop via port in lower pedestal No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No capability to display electronic flight charts or AOPA airport directory. No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No graphical map capabilityNo No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Not capable of XM or international weather presentation No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE 731-20 AR or BR engines decreased thrust from 3850 lbs. to 3500 lbs. or 3650 lbs. with APR active

No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 64 of 120

Page 65: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex J – ODR Table: Learjet 75 to Learjet 40

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout differs from Learjet 75 (Garmin) to accommodate Honeywell Primus 1000 suite.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck panelsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Smaller WingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin differsNo No HO A A

Weights Max Ramp Weight reduction to21,250 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight reduction to21,000 lbs.Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,000 lbs.

No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length reduction 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length reduction requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length reduction results in smaller turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity reduction. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Removal of 2 gaspers.Reduction in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Reduction in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL panel resized and reconfigured. No No HO A A

Page 65 of 120

Page 66: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel configuration.PAX/OXY PRESS panel relocated.APU BLEED switch located on Pressurization panelL/R BLEED, EMER PRESS, PACK, HIFLOW switches located on lower instrument panel

No No HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page accessed with DU bezel keys and format different

No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) replaced by Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as G5000 except Speed versus FLC. No Takeoff Mode (TO) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

22 AFCS Autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost (Manufacturer differs, operation the same)

No No HO A A

22 AFCS FD button only disengages flight director. It does not engage the flight director. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS No UP/DOWN wheel on FGC panel.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS FGC panel – ALT knob now called ASELNo No HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic is differentNo

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Radio Management Units (RMU) on instrument panel.

No NormEmer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Audio Management functionality selected on separate audio control panel (ACP) located on instrument panel and selections displayed on RMUs

No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and Standby COM frequencies displayed only on RMUs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-B Out.No Norm HO A A

23 Comm CLR DLY switch functionality controlled by Radio Control Hot Bus switch on Clearance Delivery Head panel located on upper pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC HF radio (optional) tuning functionality and control on HF radio panel on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 66 of 120

Page 67: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

23 Comm SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button located on pedestal No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Intercom functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm L/R Oxygen Mask/Mic selection moved from pilot and copilot switch panels to ACPs and relabeled PAX OXY/AUTO No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND added.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional Satellite Phone Handset on pedestalNo Norm HO A A

23 Comm No record and playback of clearances capability No No HO A A

23 Comm EMER COM switch functionality differsNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from pedestal to Pilot Switch Panel. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT switch for STBY INSTR changed to SW/IND No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics 27 or 38 Amp-Hour NiCad or 28 Amp-Hour lead acid batteries are available. No battery heater.

No Abnorm Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/IND located on Co-Pilot’s sidewall No No HO A A

24 Electrics Circuit breaker panel (CBP), CB location on panels reassigned. No No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys and different format No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) does not have GPS. ELT switch panel and indicator light located on separate panel on pedestal.

No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels relocated on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications installed No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

26 Fire Fire test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers different

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET No Abnorm HO A A

Page 67 of 120

Page 68: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Controls functionality on rotary test knob located on SYS TEST/RESET panel on throttle quadrant.

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PITCH TRIM/RUDDER TRIM panel relocated on pedestal No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND relocated to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pilot’s and copilot’s RUD PEDAL switches relocated on pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeled RUDDER PEDAL

No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from pedestal to center switch panel. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

Anti-Ice system test accomplished on SYS TEST/RESET rotary test knob on pedestal No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Four CRT displays select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Synthetic Vision System (SVS)No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Chronometer/clock installed at both the pilot and copilot position. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indications located on optional stand-alone AOA gauge on instrument panel

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel installed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Honeywell Stall Warning system (No vane change) PFD indications differ in presentation No

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall system test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal. PFD test indications different

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Green Circle Ratio presented on airspeed indicator No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/

Landing gear position indications moved from EICAS to GEAR/HYD panel No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

Page 68 of 120

Page 69: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Recording31Indicating/Recording

Optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS) available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

(Optional) Electronic Checklist selected for display on MFD with MFD bezel keys. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

DU REVERSION/DIM panel moved to pilot switch panel and labeled REVERSION - includes ADC/AHRS/ICSG reversion switches

NoAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

DU2 and DU3 reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield. No Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs, color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from a tape to an arc.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display not available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPV now FPA (Flight Path Angle) and generated by the Universal FMS. Includes speed carat indication

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Database management accomplished through separate Data Transfer Unit No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Shorter emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from center switch panel to co-pilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing Gear handle moved from Co-Pilot’s switch panel to GEAR/HYD panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test accomplished with rotary test knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

No Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD or HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights Exterior light control; no smoking/belts; and Emergency light switches moved from overhead light switch panel to center switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Lights test accomplished with rotary knob on pedestal. Also runs audio test. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 69 of 120

Page 70: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Some of the pilot’s and copilot’s Garmin’s DU softkeys and GTCs functions replaced by Pilot/Co-Pilot’s PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation Honeywell’s AHRS replaces Garmin’s integrated AHRS system No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s PFD display options controlled by PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Tuning of Navigation radios via RMUs. Audio portion of Nav radios controlled via Audio control panels located on pilot and copilot instrument panels.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

34 Navigation No automatic reversion of ADCs during malfunctions. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation ADC test added, not a BIT test. Test completed with rotary test switch located on pedestal.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Traditional round gauges replace Integrated Electronic Standby (IESI) for Airspeed, Attitude and Altitude. Standby navigation accomplished on RMU.

No AbnormEmer

TCBI,SU B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source, Course and bearing pointers controlled via Pilot/Co-Pilot PFD display Controllers located on glareshield

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder without Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

34 Navigation Transponder, no auto select function for ground and airborne ops. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Different weather radar with panel located on pedestal. No lightning or turbulence detection.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS CDUs located on pedestal. Operation and functionality different No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation No PFD insert map to display traffic or navigation. No No HO A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS uses GPS, VOR and DME/DME capability. (Garmin uses GPS and SBAS WAAS only)

No NormAbnorm HO A A

34 Navigation WAAS/LPV optional equipment on Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation No reactive wind shear detection and guidance. No No HO A A

34 Navigation No MFD Auto-ZoomNo No HO A A

Page 70 of 120

Page 71: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation MFD joystick provides FMS position input and control of some MFD displays No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation Optional Takeoff and landing (TOLD) data base housed in Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different

No No TCBI,SU B A

34 Navigation No Nav to Nav transfer for VOR/ILS approaches No No TCBI,

SU C B

34 Navigation ACSS TCAS II (previously Garmin). PFD indications and guidance different No Abnorm

Emer HO A A

34 Navigation Honeywell’s GPWS (previously Garmin TAWS-A). PFD/MFD indications different No Normal

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS control panel with G/S, FLAP, STEEP APPR and TERR override switched located on throttle quadrant

GPWS test on rotary test switch replaces TAWS test on System Test page of GT

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU B A

35 Oxygen Oxygen synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys. Format and information displayed is different.

No Norm HO A A

35 Oxygen PAX OXY/PRESS panel relocated on pedestal moved to copilot switch panel and relabeled PAX OXYGEN (Also in 21)

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

No Wi-Fi Iridium out. Maintenance data accessed with laptop via port in lower pedestal No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No capability to display electronic flight charts or AOPA airport directory. No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No graphical map capabilityNo No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Not capable of XM or international weather presentation No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE 731-20 AR or BR engines (Decreased thrust from 3850 lbs. to 3500 lbs. or 3650 lbs. with APR active

No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 71 of 120

Page 72: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex K – Learjet 70 to Learjet 75

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Weights Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,500 lbs.(aircraft modified by SB 75-11-1) No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length increased 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length increased requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length increase results in bigger turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity increase. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Addition of 2 gaspers.Increase in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Increase in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

23Comm

Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

27Flight Controls

Increased length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

28Fuel

Fuel System difference limited to an increase in Total Useable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Increase in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Longer emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

35Oxygen

6 dual masks drop (was 5)Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

Page 72 of 120

Page 73: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

52Doors

Fuel quantity increase relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length increase requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Additional three windows require no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 73 of 120

Page 74: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex L – Learjet 70 to Learjet 45

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout differs from Learjet 75 (Garmin) to accommodate Honeywell Primus 1000 suite.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck panelsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Smaller WingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin differsNo No HO A A

Weights Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,500 lbs.No No HO A A

Dimensions Overall Length increased 23.55 inchesNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

6Dimensions and Areas

Fuselage length increased requires new formulas for weight and balance. No No HO A A

9Towing and Taxiing

Fuselage length increase results in bigger turning radius, no operational impact. No No HO A A

11Placards

Fuel Quantity placards (interior & exterior) change to reflect useable quantity increase. No No HO A A

21Air Conditioning

Addition of 2 gaspers.Increase in length of main cabin condition air ducting.Increase in length vacuum line (pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.

No No HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL panel resized and reconfigured. No No HO A A

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel configuration.PAX/OXY PRESS panel relocated.APU BLEED switch located on Pressurization panelL/R BLEED, EMER PRESS, PACK, HIFLOW switches located on lower instrument panel

No No HO A A

Page 74 of 120

Page 75: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page accessed with DU bezel keys and format different

No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) replaced by Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as G5000 except Speed versus FLC. No Takeoff Mode (TO) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

22 AFCS Autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost (Manufacturer differs, operation the same)

No No HO A A

22 AFCS FD button only disengages flight director. It does not engage the flight director. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS No UP/DOWN wheel on FGC panel.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS FGC panel – ALT knob now called ASELNo No HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic is differentNo

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Antenna relocation results in no change to system operation. No No HO A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Radio Management Units (RMU) on instrument panel.

No NormEmer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Audio Management functionality selected on separate audio control panel (ACP) located on instrument panel and selections displayed on RMUs

No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and Standby COM frequencies displayed only on RMUs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-B Out.No Norm HO A A

23 Comm CLR DLY switch functionality controlled by Radio Control Hot Bus switch on Clearance Delivery Head panel located on upper pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC HF radio (optional) tuning functionality and control on HF radio panel on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button located on pedestal No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Intercom functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 75 of 120

Page 76: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm L/R Oxygen Mask Mic selection moved from pilot and copilot switch panels to ACPs and relabeled PAX OXY/AUTO

NoNorm

AbnormEmer

HO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND added.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Optional Satellite Phone Handset on pedestalNo Norm HO A A

23 Comm No record and playback of clearances capability No No HO A A

23 Comm EMER COM switch functionality differsNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from pedestal to Pilot Switch Panel. No No HO A A

24 Electrics EMER BATT switch for STBY INSTR changed to SW/IND No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics 27 or 38 Amp-Hour NiCad or 28 Amp-Hour lead acid batteries are available. No battery heater.

No Abnorm Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/IND located on Co-Pilot’s sidewall No No HO A A

24 Electrics Circuit breaker panel (CBP), CB location on panels reassigned. No No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys and different format No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) does not have GPS. ELT switch panel and indicator light located on separate panel on pedestal.

No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels relocated on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications installed No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

26 Fire Fire test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

Increased length control system cables. Control system operation not affected. No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers different

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality on rotary test knob located on SYS TEST/RESET panel on throttle quadrant.

No Abnorm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

Page 76 of 120

Page 77: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

27 Flight Controls

PITCH TRIM/RUDDER TRIM panel relocated on pedestal No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND relocated to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pilot’s and copilot’s RUD PEDAL switches relocated on pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeled RUDDER PEDAL

No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

28Fuel

Fuel System difference limited to an increase in Total Usable Quantity. No change to any other system aspect.

No No HO A A

29Hydraulic Power

Increase in length of hydraulic nose gear extend and retract lines. Hydraulic system operation not affected.

No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from pedestal to center switch panel. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

Anti-Ice system test accomplished on SYS TEST/RESET rotary test knob on pedestal No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Four CRT displays select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Synthetic Vision System (SVS)No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Chronometer/clock installed at both the pilot and copilot position. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indications located on optional stand-alone AOA gauge on instrument panel

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel installed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Honeywell Stall Warning system (No vane change) PFD indications differ in presentation No

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall system test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal. PFD test indications different

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Green Circle Ratio presented on airspeed indicator No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/

Landing gear position indications moved from EICAS to GEAR/HYD panel

No NormAbnorm

HO A A

Page 77 of 120

Page 78: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

Recording31Indicating/Recording

Optional Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS) available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

(Optional) Electronic Checklist selected for display on MFD with MFD bezel keys. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

DU REVERSION/DIM panel moved to pilot switch panel and labeled REVERSION - includes ADC/AHRS/ICSG reversion switches

NoAbnorm

Emer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

DU2 and DU3 reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield. No Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs, color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from a tape to an arc.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display not available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPV now FPA (Flight Path Angle) and generated by the Universal FMS. Includes speed carat indication

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Database management accomplished through separate Data Transfer Unit No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Longer emergency landing gear cable, no change in system operation. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing Gear handle moved from Co-Pilot’s switch panel to GEAR/HYD panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test accomplished with rotary test knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

No Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD or HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights Exterior light control; no smoking/belts; and Emergency light switches moved from overhead light switch panel to center switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Lights test accomplished with rotary knob on pedestal. Also runs audio test. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation EGPWS, TCAS 2000 and ELT are installation standards, no operational differences from optional (STC) installations.

No No HO A A

34 Navigation Some of the pilot’s and copilot’s Garmin’s No Norm CSS, B B

Page 78 of 120

Page 79: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

DU softkeys and GTCs functions replaced.Abnorm

PTT FTD 2-5

34 Navigation Honeywell’s AHRS replace by Garmin’s integrated AHRS system No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s PFD display options controlled by PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Tuning of Navigation radios via RMUs. Audio portion of Nav radios controlled via Audio control panels located on pilot and copilot instrument panels.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

34 Navigation No automatic reversion of ADCs during malfunctions. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation ADC test added, not a BIT test. Test completed with rotary test switch located on pedestal.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Traditional round gauges replace Electronic Standby Instrumentation System (ESIS) for Airspeed, Attitude and Altitude. Standby navigation accomplished on RMU.

No AbnormEmer

TCBI,SU B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source, Course and bearing pointers controlled via Pilot/Co-Pilot PFD display Controllers located on glareshield

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder without Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

34 Navigation Transponder, no auto select function for ground and airborne ops. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Different weather radar with panel located on pedestal. No lightning or turbulence detection.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS CDUs located on pedestal. Operation and functionality different No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation No PFD insert map to display traffic or navigation. No No HO A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS uses GPS, VOR and DME/DME capability. (Garmin uses GPS and SBAS WAAS only)

No NormAbnorm HO A A

34 Navigation WAAS/LPV optional equipment on Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation No reactive wind shear detection and guidance. No No HO A A

34 Navigation No MFD Auto-ZoomNo No HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick provides FMS position input and control of some MFD displays No Norm HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY COMPLIANCE METHOD

Page 79 of 120

Page 80: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

(POI)____________________________TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Optional Takeoff and Landing (TOLD) data base housed in Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different

No No TCBI,SU B A

34 Navigation No Nav to Nav transfer for VOR/ILS approaches No No TCBI,

SU C B

34 Navigation ACSS TCAS II (previously Garmin). PFD indications and guidance different No Abnorm

Emer HO A A

34 Navigation Honeywell’s GPWS (previously Garmin TAWS-A). PFD/MFD indications different No Normal

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS control panel with G/S, FLAP, STEEP APPR and TERR override switched located on throttle quadrant

GPWS test on rotary test switch replaces TAWS test on System Test page of GT

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU B A

35 Oxygen 6 dual masks drop (was 5)Oxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manual changed.

No No HO A A

35 Oxygen Oxygen synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys. Format and information displayed is different.

No Norm HO A A

35 Oxygen PAX OXY/PRESS panel relocated on pedestal moved to copilot switch panel and relabeled PAX OXYGEN (Also in 21)

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

No Wi-Fi Iridium out. Maintenance data accessed with laptop via port in lower pedestal No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No capability to display electronic flight charts or AOPA airport directory. No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No graphical map capabilityNo No HO A A

52 Doors Fuel quantity increase relocated gravity fuel fill door, no operational impact. No No HO A A

53Fuselage

Fuselage length increase requires no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

56Windows

Additional three windows require no special maintenance or operational restrictions. No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Not capable of XM or international weather presentation No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE 731-20 AR or BR engines (Decreased thrust from 3850 lbs. to 3500 lbs. or 3650 lbs. with APR active

No No HO A A

Page 80 of 120

Page 81: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Page 81 of 120

Page 82: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 82 of 120

Page 83: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Annex M – Learjet 70 to Learjet 40

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

DESIGN REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

AircraftGeneral

Flight Deck panel layout differs from Learjet 70 (Garmin) to accommodate Honeywell Primus 1000 suite.

No No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Relocated flight deck panelsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Smaller WingletsNo No HO A A

AircraftGeneral

Passenger cabin differsNo No HO A A

Weights Max Ramp Weight increased to 21,750 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight increased to 21,500 lbs. No No HO A A

Dimensions Dimensions unchangedNo No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL panel resized and reconfigured. No No HO A A

21 ECS PRESSURIZATION panel configuration.PAX/OXY PRESS panel relocated.APU BLEED switch located on Pressurization panelL/R BLEED, EMER PRESS, PACK, HIFLOW switches located on lower instrument panel

No No HO A A

21 ECS ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM (ECS) synoptic page accessed with DU bezel keys and format different

No Norm HO A A

22 AFCS Garmin Mode Controller (GMC) replaced by Flight Guidance Controller Panel (FGC) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

22 AFCS Flight Director Modes same as G5000 except Speed versus FLC. No Takeoff Mode (TO) No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

22 AFCS Autopilot servos, yaw damper and rudder boost (Manufacturer differs, operation the same)

No No HO A A

22 AFCS FD button only disengages flight director. It does not engage the flight director. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

Page 83 of 120

Page 84: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

22 AFCS No UP/DOWN wheel on FGC panel.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

22 AFCS FGC panel – ALT knob now called ASELNo No HO A A

22 AFCS Autopilot engage/disengage logic is differentNo

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

23 Comm Communication and navigation radio functions selected and displayed at Radio Management Units (RMU) on instrument panel.

No NormEmer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Audio Management functionality selected on separate audio control panel (ACP) located on instrument panel and selections displayed on RMUs

No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

23 Comm Active and Standby COM frequencies displayed only on RMUs No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-B Out.No Norm HO A A

23 Comm CLR DLY switch functionality controlled by Radio Control Hot Bus switch on Clearance Delivery Head panel located on upper pedestal.

No Norm HO A A

23 Comm No provision for ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) No Norm HO A A

23 Comm GTC HF radio (optional) tuning functionality and control on HF radio panel on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm SELCAL HF/VHF PRESS FOR TEST/RESET button located on pedestal No Norm HO A A

23 Comm Passenger Address (PA) functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Intercom functionality and selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm Transmit and receive selection moved from GTC to ACP No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm L/R Oxygen Mask/Mic selection moved from pilot and copilot switch panels to ACPs and relabeled PAX OXY/AUTO No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/IND added.No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

23 Comm (Optional) Satellite Phone Handset on pedestal No Norm HO A A

23 Comm No record and playback of clearances capability No No HO A A

23 Comm EMER COM switch functionality differsNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved from pedestal to Pilot Switch Panel. No No HO A A

Page 84 of 120

Page 85: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

24 Electrics EMER BATT switch for STBY INSTR changed to SW/IND No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics 27 or 38 Amp-Hour NiCad or 28 Amp-Hour lead acid batteries are available. No battery heater.

No Abnorm Emer HO A A

24 Electrics Emergency Bus load shedding/distributionNo Abnorm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/IND located on Co-Pilot’s sidewall No No HO A A

24 Electrics Circuit breaker panel (CBP), CB location on panels reassigned. No No HO A A

24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys and different format No Norm HO A A

25 Equipment and Furnishings

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) does not have GPS. ELT switch panel and indicator light located on separate panel on pedestal.

No No HO A A

26 Fire Engine and APU switches and panels relocated on pedestal. No No HO A A

26 Fire Crew Warning Panel/RMU indications installed No Norm

EmerTCBI,

SU A A

26 Fire Fire test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

27 Flight Controls

EICAS and Synoptic Indications of: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitch trim; flaps; and, spoilers different

No Norm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

SPLN RESET and FLAP RESET functionality on rotary test knob located on SYS TEST/RESET panel on throttle quadrant.

No Abnorm HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PIT TRIM BIAS switch moved to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

PITCH TRIM/RUDDER TRIM panel relocated on pedestal No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

RUD BOOST SW/IND relocated to throttle quadrant No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Pilot’s and copilot’s RUD PEDAL switches relocated on pilot and copilot switch panels and relabeled RUDDER PEDAL

No No HO A A

27 Flight Controls

Flaps test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

30 Ice and Rain

ANTI-ICE panel moved from pedestal to center switch panel. No No HO A A

30 Ice and Rain

Anti-Ice system test accomplished on SYS TEST/RESET rotary test knob on pedestal No No TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Four CRT displays select key functionality on lower bezel surfaces No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU B A

31Indicating/Recording

Summary Page and all Synoptics differ in presentation No No TCBI,

SU A A

Page 85 of 120

Page 86: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic Flight Information System (EFIS) differs in presentation and functionality. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) differs in presentation and functionality

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Synthetic Vision System (SVS)No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Chronometer/clock installed at both the pilot and copilot position. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Advisory AOA indications located on optional stand-alone AOA gauge on instrument panel

No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) panel installed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Honeywell Stall Warning system (No vane change) PFD indications differ in presentation No

NormAbnorm

Emer

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Stall system test accomplished with SYS TEST/RESET rotary knob on pedestal. PFD test indications different

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

No Green Circle Ratio presented on airspeed indicator No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Landing gear position indications moved from EICAS to GEAR/HYD panel No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

(Optional) Runway Awareness Alerting System (RAAS) available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

(Optional) Electronic Checklist selected for display on MFD with MFD bezel keys. No Norm HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

DU REVERSION/DIM panel moved to pilot switch panel and labeled REVERSION - includes ADC/AHRS/ICSG reversion switches

No AbnormEmer

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

DU2 and DU3 reversion controls on pilot’s and copilot’s glareshield. No Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

31Indicating/Recording

Low Speed Awareness and Overspeed cues on PFDs, color logic changed. No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Heading, speed, altitude select bugs and navigation source color logic changes. No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

Page 86 of 120

Page 87: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

31Indicating/Recording

VSI indication changed from a tape to an arc.No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

Electronic navigation chart display not available No No HO A A

31Indicating/Recording

FPV now FPA (Flight Path Angle) and generated by the Universal FMS. Includes speed carat indication

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU A A

31Indicating/Recording

Database management accomplished through separate Data Transfer Unit No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

GEAR/HYD panel moved from center switch panel to co-pilot switch panel. No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Landing Gear handle moved from Co-Pilot’s switch panel to GEAR/HYD panel No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

Gear test accomplished with rotary test knob on pedestal No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

32Landing Gear

Gear Caution/Warning indications differ in presentation. Logic is the same No No HO A A

32Landing Gear

No Synoptic presentation of AUX HYD or HYD XFLOW indications No No HO A A

33 Lights Exterior light control; no smoking/belts; and Emergency light switches moved from overhead light switch panel to center switch panel

No Norm HO A A

33 Lights Lights test accomplished with rotary knob on pedestal. Also runs audio test. No Norm TCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Some of the pilot’s and copilot’s Garmin’s DU softkeys and GTCs functions replaced by Pilot/Co-Pilot’s PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

Abnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B B

34 Navigation Honeywell’s AHRS replaces Garmin’s integrated AHRS system No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Pilot’s and copilot’s PFD display options controlled by PFD Display Controllers. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation Tuning of Navigation radios via RMUs. Audio portion of Nav radios controlled via Audio control panels located on pilot and copilot instrument panels.

No NormAbnorm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

B A

34 Navigation No automatic reversion of ADCs during malfunctions. No Norm

AbnormTCBI,

SU A A

34 Navigation ADC test added, not a BIT test. Test completed with rotary test switch located on pedestal.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

Page 87 of 120

Page 88: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

34 Navigation Traditional round gauges replace Electronic Standby Instrumentation System (ESIS) for Airspeed, Attitude and Altitude. Standby navigation accomplished on RMU.

No AbnormEmer

TCBI,SU B B

34 Navigation PFD’s Nav Source, Course and bearing pointers controlled via Pilot/Co-Pilot PFD display Controllers located on glareshield

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Mode S transponder without Enhanced Surveillance and ADS-B-Out No

NormAbnorm

EmerHO A A

34 Navigation Transponder, no auto select function for ground and airborne ops. No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation Different weather radar with panel located on pedestal. No lightning or turbulence detection.

No Norm TCBI,SU A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS CDUs located on pedestal. Operation and functionality different No Norm

CSS, PTT FTD 2-5

C C

34 Navigation No PFD insert map to display traffic or navigation. No No HO A A

34 Navigation Universal FMS uses GPS, VOR and DME/DME capability. (Garmin uses GPS and SBAS WAAS only)

No NormAbnorm HO A A

34 Navigation WAAS/LPV optional equipment on Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation No reactive wind shear detection and guidance. No No HO A A

34 Navigation No MFD Auto-ZoomNo No HO A A

34 Navigation MFD joystick provides FMS position input and control of some MFD displays No Norm HO A A

34 Navigation (Optional) Takeoff and Landing (TOLD) data base housed in Universal FMS. Operation and functionality different

No No TCBI,SU B A

34 Navigation No Nav to Nav transfer for VOR/ILS approaches No No TCBI,

SU C B

34 Navigation ACSS TCAS II (previously Garmin). PFD indications and guidance different No Abnorm

Emer HO A A

34 Navigation Honeywell’s GPWS (previously Garmin TAWS-A). PFD/MFD indications different No Norm

Abnorm HO A A

34 Navigation GPWS control panel with G/S, FLAP, STEEP APPR and TERR override switched located on throttle quadrant

GPWS test on rotary test switch replaces TAWS test on System Test page of GT

No NormAbnorm

TCBI,SU B A

35 Oxygen Oxygen synoptic page accessed via DU bezel keys. Format and information displayed is different.

No Norm HO A A

Page 88 of 120

Page 89: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

SYSTEM REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

35 Oxygen PAX OXY/PRESS panel relocated on pedestal moved to copilot switch panel and relabeled PAX OXYGEN (Also in 21)

No No HO A A

45Central Maintenance System

No Wi-Fi Iridium out. Maintenance data accessed with laptop via port in lower pedestal No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No capability to display electronic flight charts or AOPA airport directory. No No HO A A

46 Information Systems

No graphical map capabilityNo No HO A A

46 Information Systems

Not capable of XM or international weather presentation No No HO A A

70 Powerplant L and R Engine controls relocated on pedestalNo No HO A A

70 Powerplant TFE 731-20 AR or BR engines (Decreased thrust from 3850 lbs. to 3500 lbs. or 3650 lbs. with APR active

No No HO A A

DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40 BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 70 APPROVED BY (POI)____________________________

COMPLIANCE METHOD

TRAINING CHKG/CURR

MANEUVER REMARKS FLTCHAR

PROCCHNG

LVLA

LVLB

LVLC

LVLD CHK CURR

PTSManeuvers No Changes No No HO A A

Page 89 of 120

Page 90: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

APPENDIX 3

AIRCRAFT REGULATORY COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST

Compliance checklist supplied by Bombardier Learjet for LR-75 only, Original FSB report for LR-45 (05/10/1998) and LR-40 (03/03/2006) did not have compliance checklist.

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91. 9(a)

Compliance with Flight Manual, Markings, and Placard Markings

Compliant An Airplane Flight Manual is provided and placards are installed

Complies

91. 9 (b)(1)

Availability of Current Airplane Flight Manual in Aircraft

Compliant An Airplane Flight Manual is provided and placards are installed

Complies

91. 9(c)

Identification of Aircraft inAccordance with FAR 45

Compliant Aircraft is identified painted on the aircraft

Complies

91.103 (a)

IFR Flight Planning and Fuel Requirements

Compliant Aircraft performance information is provided in the AFM and in the Pilots guide

Complies

91.103 (b)(1)

Preflight Planning Runway Performance Data

Compliant Aircraft performance takeoff and landing data is provided in the AFM

Complies

91.126 (c)

On or In The Vicinity of an Airport in Class G Airspace Minimum Certificated Landing Flap Setting

Compliant Aircraft performance landing data for normal and abnormal flap settings are provided in the AFM

Complies

91.180 (a)(1)

Reduced Vertical Separation Minimums

Compliant RVSM operational information and procedures are provided in the AFM

Complies

Page 90 of 120

Page 91: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.189 Category II or III Operations Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.191 Category II and Category III Manual

Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.203 (a)(b)

Valid Airworthiness Certificate, Flight Permit, Registration Certificate.

Compliant The holder is in the same location as it is on the 45. It is in the cockpit mounted on the Forward side of the LH Forward Cabinet

Complies

91.203 (c)

Fuel Tanks in the Passenger/Baggage Compartment

Not Applicable Fuel tanks are not in the passenger or baggage compartments

Not Applicable

91.203 (d)

Fuel Venting and Exhaust Emissions Requirements

Compliant Fuel & vent system is unchanged from the Model 45 aircraft

Complies

91.205 (a)

Powered Civil Aircraft with Standard Category U.S. Airworthiness Certificates: Instrument and Equipment Requirements: General

Compliant Instruments and items are included

Complies

91.205 (b)

Day VFR Compliant Instruments and items are included

Complies

91.205 (c)

Night VFR Compliant Instruments and items are included

Complies

Page 91 of 120

Page 92: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.205 (d)

IFR Compliant Instruments and items are included

Complies

91.205 (e)

Flight at and Above FL240 Compliant Instruments and items are included

Complies

91.205 (f)

Category II Operations Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.205 (g)

Category III Operations Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.205 (h)

Night Vision Goggle Operations

Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.207 (a)(b)

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT)

Compliant ELT is installed as required

Complies

91.207 (c)

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT)Batteries

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.207 (d)

Emergency Locator Transmitter (ELT) Maintenance

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 92 of 120

Page 93: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.209 (b)

Operate an aircraft equipped with an anti-collision light system.

Compliant Position, beacon and anti-collision lights installed on aircraft

Complies

91.211 (a)

Supplemental Oxygen: General

Compliant O2 system is installed in the aircraft and O2 duration information is provided for the flight crew to determine if enough O2 is onboard for the flight

Complies

91.211 (b)

Pressurized Cabin Aircraft Compliant O2 system is installed in the aircraft and O2 duration information is provided for the flight crew to determine if enough O2 is onboard for the flight

Complies

91.213 Inoperative Instruments and Equipment

Compliant FAA AEG will update the existing MMEL for the M45 to include the aircraft modification

Complies

91.215 (a)

ATC Transponder and Altitude Reporting Equipment and Use

Compliant ATC transponder meets environmental requirements of class

Complies

91.215 (b),(c) (d)

Transponder Operation Compliant ATC transponder meets environmental requirements of class

Complies

91.217 (a)(1)

Deactivation of equipment Operator Responsibility

Not directed by ATC Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.217 (a)(2)

Tests and calibration. Compliant Tested and calibrated to 125’

Complies

Page 93 of 120

Page 94: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.217 (a)(3)

Altimeters and digitizers standards.

Compliant Meets standards of TSO-C10b and TSO-C88

Complies

91.217 (b)

Same Source Compliant Derived from same source

Complies

91.219 (a)

Approved Altitude Alerting System

Compliant An altitude alerting system is installed in the aircraft

Complies

91.219 (b)

Altitude alerting system or device.

Compliant An altitude alerting system is installed in the aircraft

Complies

91.221 (a)(b)

Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System Equipment and Use

Compliant A Traffic Collision Avoidance System, TCAS, with resolution advisory is installed in the aircraft

Complies

91.223 (a)

Terrain Awareness and Warning System

Compliant Compliant Class A TAWS to C151B installed

Complies

91.223 (b)

Terrain Awareness and Warning System

Not applicable Manufactured after Mar 29, 2002

Not Applicable

91.223 (c)

Terrain Awareness and Warning System

Compliant The AFM contains the procedures for the Terrain Awareness Warning System, TAWS

Complies

Page 94 of 120

Page 95: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.223 (d)

Terrain Awareness and Warning System

Not applicable Not Applicable

91.225 (a)

Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast Out Equipment

Compliant ADS-B equipment installed and verified

Complies

91.227 (b)

1090 MHz ES and UAT Broadcast Links and Power Requirements

Compliant ADS-B equipment installed and verified and meets the performance requirements of TSO-C166b, Class B1.

Complies

91.227 (c)

ADS-B Out Performance Requirements

Compliant ADS-B equipment installed and verified

Complies

91.227 (d)

Minimum Broadcast Message Element Set

Compliant ADS-B equipment installed and verified

Complies

91.227 (e)

ADS-B Latency Requirements

Compliant ADS-B equipment installed and verified

Complies

91.227 (g)

Incorporation by Reference Not applicable Not Applicable

91.409 Inspections Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 95 of 120

Page 96: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.411 Altimeter System and Altitude Reporting Equipment Tests and Inspections

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.413 ATC Transponder Tests and Inspections

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.503 (a)(1)

Flying Equipment and Operating Information: Flashlights

Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.503 (a)(2)

Cockpit Checklist Compliant Procedure provided in AFM & a checklist is provided with the aircraft

Complies

91.503 (a)(3)(a)(4)

Aeronautical Charts Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.503 (a)(5)

One Engine Inoperative Climb Performance Data

Compliant Procedure provided in AFM & a checklist is provided with the aircraft

Complies

91.503 (b)(c)

Cockpit Checklist Contents Compliant Procedure provided in AFM & a checklist is provided with the aircraft

Complies

91.503 (d)

Use of Data by Crew Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 96 of 120

Page 97: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.505 Familiarity with Operating Limitations and Emergency Equipment

Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.507 Equipment Requirement: Over the Top, or Night VFR Operations

Compliant Aircraft has necessary instruments and equipment and multiple landing lights

Complies

91.509 (a)

Survival Equipment for Overwater Operations (life preserver / flotation means)

Compliant Aircraft has flotation devices for each seat

Complies

91.509 (b)

Survival Equipment for Overwater Operations (extended overwater equipment)

Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.509 (d)(e)

Survival Equipment for Overwater Operations (extended overwater equipment)

Operator Responsibility

PIC responsibility Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.511 Radio Equipment for Overwater Operations

Compliant The radio communication and navigation equipment installed meets the requirements

Complies

91.513 Emergency Equipment Compliant All emergency equipment is installed

Complies

91.517 Passenger information Compliant Passenger signs are installed

Complies

Page 97 of 120

Page 98: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.519 Passenger Briefing Operator Responsibility

Part of Cabin Management System (CMS)

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.521 Shoulder Harness Compliant Shoulder harnesses are installed

Complies

91.525 Carriage of Cargo Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.527 Operating in Icing Conditions

Compliant Anti-ice equipment is installed

Complies

91.531 Second In Command Requirements

Compliant Two pilots required Complies

91.533 Flight Attendant Requirements

Not applicable Not Applicable

91.535 Stowage of Food, Beverages and Passenger Service Equipment.

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.603 Aural Speed Warning Device

Compliant Aural Speed warning installed

Complies

Page 98 of 120

Page 99: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.605 Transport Category Civil Airplane Weight Limitations

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.607 Emergency Exits for Airplanes Carrying Passengers for Hire

Compliant Equipped with emergency exit

Complies

91.609 (a)

Operation with Inactive Flight Data Recorder or Cockpit Voice Recorder

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.609 (b)

Operation by Other than Holder of Air Carrier or Commercial Certificate

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.609 (c)

Requirements for Flight Data Recorder - 10+ passengers

Not applicable Not Applicable

91.609 (d)

FDR Operations Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.609 (e)(f)

Requirement for Cockpit Voice Recorder

Compliant CVR installed Complies

91.609 (g)

Accident Reporting Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 99 of 120

Page 100: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.609 (h)

CVR specifications effective April 7, 2012

Compliant CVR meets requirements

Complies

91.609 (i)

Cockpit Voice Recorder Not Applicable Operator Responsibility

91.609 (j)

Datalink Recording Not applicable Operator Responsibility

91.613 Materials for Compartment Interiors

Compliant Interior materials meet requirements

Complies

91.801 (a)(2)

Part 36 Applicability Compliant Meets noise limits Complies

91.805 Operating Noise Limits for Subsonic Airplanes

Compliant Meets noise limits Complies

91.853 Operating Noise Limits for Subsonic Airplanes

Compliant Meets noise limits Complies

91.1023 & .1025

Program Operating Manual Requirements and Contents

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 100 of 120

Page 101: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.1033(a)(1) & (b)

Cockpit Checklist Compliant Checklist provided with aircraft

Complies

91.1033(a)(2) & (c)

Emergency Cockpit Checklist

Compliant Checklist provided with aircraft

Complies

91.1033(a)(3)

Aeronautical Charts Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.1033(a)(4)

IFR Navigation/Approach Charts

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.1035 (e)

Automated Briefing Recording

Optionally Compliant Integrated into the Cabin Management System (CMS)

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.1035(f)

Passenger Briefing Cards Compliant Cards come with aircraft

Complies

91.1045(b)(1)

Cockpit Voice Recorder Compliant CVR installed Complies

91.1045(b)(2)

Flight Recorder Not applicable Not Applicable

Page 101 of 120

Page 102: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91.1045(b)(3)

TAWS System Compliant TAWS installed Complies

91.1045(b)(4)

TCAS System Compliant TCAS installed Complies

91.1045(b)(5)

Airborne Weather Radar Equipment

Compliant Weather radar installed Complies

91.1109 (b)(1)

Manufacturer Aircraft Maintenance Inspection Program

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.1115(a)

Minimum Equipment List Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.1411 Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

91.App A

Category II Operations Not Applicable Not approved for operation

Not Applicable

91.App C

Operations in the North Atlantic (NAT) Minimum Navigation Performance Specifications (MNPS) Airspace

Compliant Navigation tolerances qualify for NAT MNPS airspace

Complies

Page 102 of 120

Page 103: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

91 App G

Operations in Reduced Vertical Separation (RVSM) Airspace

Compliant Navigation tolerances qualify for RVSM airspace

Complies

135. 21 Manual Requirements Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.75 (b)

Inspector’s Credential: Admission to pilot’s compartment: Forward observer’s seat.

Operator Responsibility

Operator must supply headset/splitter

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.76 (b)

DOD Commercial Air Carrier Evaluator’s Credentials: Admission to Pilots Compartment: Forward Observer’s Seat

Operator Responsibility

Operator must supply headset/splitter

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.81 (c)

Aircraft Equipment Manuals and Aircraft Flight Manual

Compliant AFM and equipment manuals provided with aircraft

Complies

135.83 (a)(1) & (b)

Cockpit Checklist Compliant Checklist provided with aircraft

Complies

135.83 (a)(2) & (c)

Emergency Procedures Checklist

Compliant Checklist provided with aircraft

Complies

135.83 (a)(3)

Aeronautical Charts Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 103 of 120

Page 104: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.83 (a)(4)

IFR Navigation/Approach Charts

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.83 (a)(5)

Multiengine Aircraft One-Engine Climb Data

Compliant Checklist provided with aircraft

Complies

135.89 (b)

Supplemental Oxygen, Pressurized Cabin Aircraft

Compliant Supplemental oxygen system installed

Complies

135.93 Autopilot: Minimum Altitudes for Use

Compliant 500’ minimum enroute altitude

Complies

135.99 (a)

Composition of Flight Crew – AFM Limitations

Compliant Two pilots required Complies

135.99 (b)

Second in Command required for 10 or more passenger seating configuration.

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.113 Passenger Occupancy of Pilot Seat

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.117 Briefing of Passengers before Flight

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 104 of 120

Page 105: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.122 Stowage of Food, Beverages and Passenger Service Equipment.

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.123 Emergency and Emergency Evacuation Duties

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.127 Passenger Information Compliant Passenger signs installed

Complies

135.128 Safety Belts and Child Restraint Systems

Operator Responsibility

Safety belts installed. Child restraint system provided by carrier or passenger

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.129(d)(e)

Exit Seating Passenger Information Cards

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.143(b)

Approved/Operable Instruments and Equipment

Compliant Required instruments installed

Complies

135.143(c)

ATC Transponder Compliant Required transponder installed

Complies

135.145 (d)(1)

Validation Testing Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 105 of 120

Page 106: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.147 Dual Controls Required Compliant Two pilots required Complies

135.149(a)

Altimeter Adjustable for Barometric Pressure

Compliant Two primary and standby altimeters installed

Complies

135.149(b)

Heating or Deicing Equipment

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.149(c)

Turbojet Additional equipment

Compliant Standby ADI installed Complies

135.149(e)

Additional Equipment Administrator Requires

Compliant As required by the Administrator

Complies

135.150 (a)

Public Address System Not applicable PA system installed Not Applicable

135.150 (b)

Crew Interphone System Not applicable Interphone system installed

Not Applicable

135.151(a)

Requirement and Installation of CVR

Compliant CVR installed Complies

Page 106 of 120

Page 107: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.151(b)

Requirement and Installation of CVR

Not applicable CVR installed Not Applicable

135.151(d)

Boom and Mask Microphone

Compliant Boom and mask interphone installed

Complies

135.151 (c)(e)

CVR - Recorded Data Compliant CVR capable of keeping recorded data

Complies

135.151(f)

Additional CVR Requirements

Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.151(g)

Additional CVR Requirements

Compliant Required CVR installed Complies

135.151(h)

Recording Datalink messages

Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152(a)

Requirement for FDR Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152(b)

Requirement for Flight Data Recorder

Not applicable Not Applicable

Page 107 of 120

Page 108: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.152(c)

FDR Operations Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152 (d)(e)

FDR – Recorded Data Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.152(f)

Installation Requirements Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152(g)

Underwater Locator Device Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152(h)

Operational Parameters Required to be Recorded

Not applicable Operator Responsibility

135.152(i)

FDR required parameters data ranges, accuracies, resolutions and intervals

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.152(j)

FDR required parameters data ranges, accuracies, resolutions and intervals

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.152(m)

FDR Requirements Not applicable Operator Responsibility

Page 108 of 120

Page 109: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.153(a)

Requirement for GPWS Compliant Installed GPWS compliant

Complies

135.153(c)

Airplane Flight Manual Compliant AFM supplied with aircraft

Complies

135.154 (a)

Terrain Awareness and Warning System

Compliant Installed TAWS compliant

Complies

135.154 (c)

AFM procedures for TAWS Compliant AFM supplied with aircraft

Complies

135.155(a)

Fire Extinguishers: Type and Suitability of Agent

Compliant Halon 1211 Complies

135.155(b)

Fire Extinguisher on Flight Deck

Compliant Halon 1211 Complies

135.155(c)

Fire Extinguisher in Passenger Compartment

Compliant Customer option Complies

135.156 Flight data Recorders: Filtered Data

Not applicable Not Applicable

Page 109 of 120

Page 110: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.157(a)

Oxygen Equipment Requirements Unpressurized aircraft.

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.157(b)

Oxygen Equipment Requirements Pressurized Aircraft.

Compliant Installed O2 system compliant

Complies

135.157(c)

Equipment requirement Compliant Installed O2 system compliant

Complies

135.158(a)

Pitot Heat Indicating Systems Requirement and Operation

Compliant Pitot Heat Indicating System installed

Complies

135.159(a) - (g)

Equipment Requirements: Carrying Passengers under VFR at Night or under VFR Over The Top Conditions

Compliant Required equipment installed

Complies

135.161 Radio and Navigational Equipment: Aircraft Carrying Passengers Under VFR at Night or under VFR Over The Top

Compliant Required equipment installed

Complies

135.163 Equipment Requirements: Aircraft Carrying Passengers Under IFR

Compliant Required equipment installed

Complies

135.165 Radio and Navigational Equipment: Extended Overwater or IFR Operations

Compliant Required equipment installed

Complies

Page 110 of 120

Page 111: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.167 Emergency Equipment: Extended Overwater Operations

Optionally Compliant Operator Responsibility

135.169 Additional Airworthiness Requirements

Compliant Cargo bay compliant Complies

135.170 Materials for Compartment Interiors

Compliant Interior materials compliant

Complies

135.171(a)

Shoulder Harness Installation at Flight Crewmember Stations

Not applicable Shoulder harness system installed

Complies

135.173(a)

Airborne Thunderstorm Detection Equipment

Not applicable Airborne weather radar installed

Not Applicable

135.173(f)

Power Supply Not applicable Not Applicable

135.175(a)

Airborne Weather Radar Equipment

Compliant Airborne weather radar installed

Complies

135.175(e)

Power Supply Not applicable Not Applicable

Page 111 of 120

Page 112: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.177 Emergency Equipment Requirements for more than 19 Passengers

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.178 Additional Emergency Equipment

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.179(a)

Inoperable Instruments and Equipment

Operator Responsibility

Instruments installed and operating

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.179(b)

Instruments and Equipment NOT included in MEL

Operator Responsibility

Instruments installed and operating

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.180(a)

Requirement for an approved TCAS

Not applicable TCAS installed Complies

135.180(b)

Flight Manual Requirements Not applicable TCAS instructions included in AFM

Complies

135.181(a)(1)

Performance Requirements: Single Engine Aircraft Operated Over The Top or in IFR Conditions

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.181(a)(2)

Performance Requirements: Multi Engine Aircraft Operated Over The Top or in IFR Conditions

Compliant Aircraft compliant if limitations in AFM are not exceeded

Complies

Page 112 of 120

Page 113: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.183(a)

Performance Requirements: Land Aircraft Operated Over Water

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.183(c)

Performance Requirements: Multi Engine Land Aircraft Operated Over Water

Compliant Aircraft compliant if limitations in AFM are not exceeded

Complies

135.185(a)

Empty Weight and Center of Gravity: Currency Requirement

Not applicable Aircraft weight report supplied at delivery. Subsequent weighing is operator’s responsibility

Operator Responsibility

135.185(b)

Aircraft Original Airworthiness Certificate

Compliant Aircraft weight report supplied at delivery. Subsequent weighing is operator’s responsibility

Complies

135.227(a),(b) (c),(e), (f)

Icing Conditions: Operating Limitations

Compliant Anti-ice system installed

Complies

135.363(f)

AFM Performance Data Compliant Performance data supplied with AFM

Complies

135.364 Maximum Flying Time Outside the U.S.

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.397 Small Transport Category Airplane Performance Operating Limitations

Operator Responsibility

Performance data supplied with AFM

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 113 of 120

Page 114: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135.398(a) (b) (c) (d)

Commuter Category Airplanes Performance Operating Limitations

Operator Responsibility

Performance data supplied with AFM

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.399 Small Non-Transport Category Airplane Performance Operating Limitations

Operator Responsibility

Performance data supplied with AFM

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.411 (a)(2)

Maintenance Applicability Not applicable Not Applicable

135.419 Approved Aircraft Inspection Program

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.421 (c) (d) (e)

Manufacturer’s Maintenance Program

Not applicable Not Applicable

135.422 Aging Airplane Inspections and Records or Airplanes Certificated With 9 or Fewer Passenger Seats

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.425 Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance and Alteration Programs

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

135.427(b)

Manual for Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance and Alterations

Operator Responsibility

Agree - Operator Responsibility

Page 114 of 120

Page 115: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

14 CFRSection Requirement Compliance Remark FSB Finding

135 App. A

Not applicable Not Applicable

135 App. B

Not applicable Not Applicable

135 App. D

Not applicable Not Applicable

135 App. F

Not applicable Not Applicable

135 App. G

Not applicable Not Applicable

Page 115 of 120

Page 116: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

APPENDIX 4

Pilot Training Course Outlines

1. Differences Course Learjet 40/45 to Learjet 70/75 ( 2 Pilots = Complete Crew)

Day Theoretical Training Hours Practical Training Training Hours

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD - LOE 2.0 / 2.0

Total 16.0 16.0

Note 1: (1 Pilot only = Half Crew) being trained – minimum 12 hours IPT / FTD

Note 2: Length of difference course #1 evaluated and recommended by FSB.

Note 3: IPT training hours cannot be credited for FTD training hours, but FTD training hours can be credited for IPT training hours.

Page 116 of 120

Page 117: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

2. Differences Course Learjet 70/75 to Learjet 40/45 (2 Pilots = Complete Crew)

Day Theoretical Training Hours Practical Training Training Hours

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD 2.0 / 2.0

1 Classroom Instruction 4.0 IPT / FTD - LOE 2.0 / 2.0

Total 20.0 20.0

Note 1: (1 Pilot only = Half Crew) being trained – minimum 16 hours IPT / FTD

Note 2: Length of difference course #2 evaluated through analysis and FSB Chair must be advised of first class offering to evaluate / validate training course.

Note 3: IPT training hours cannot be credited for FTD training hours, but FTD training hours can be credited for IPT training hours.

Page 117 of 120

Page 118: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

3. Learjet 70/75 Initial Type Rating Course (2 Pilots = Complete Crew)

Training Elements Training Days Training Hours

Ground Training Segment

(Phase I)

Instructor-Led Training

Systems Integration

6

36.0

12.0

Flight Segment

(Phase II)

Instructor Briefings / Debriefings

FFS (5) 5 20.0

LOFT 1 4.0

Practical Test 1 As Required

Note 1: (1 Pilot only = Half Crew) being trained – minimums:

10 hours pilot flying / 2 hours pilot monitoring = 12 hours FFS

LOFT – 2 hours pilot flying / 2 hours pilot monitoring = 4 hours FFS

Note 2: Length of initial type rating course #3 evaluated and recommended by FSB Chair.

Page 118 of 120

Page 119: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

Line Oriented Evaluation (LOE)

Upon completion of Differences Course #1 - Learjet 40/45 to Learjet 70/75, the FSB requires a partial proficiency check in the FTD or ODR Training Level D or E Device. The LOE is administered to demonstrate proficiency in a realistic Line Operations profile of approximately 2 hours. The tasks listed below will be evaluated during the LOE. A LOE would include: Preflight, System checks, Before Takeoff checks, Departure, Climb to a Cruise altitude, Descent, Arrival, Instrument approach, missed approach, Load and fly a different instrument approach, After Landing and Shutdown checks. The evaluator would provide normal ATC instructions, weather, weight and balance data, etc. The crew is expected to perform the tasks without assistance from the evaluator.

The LOE evaluator cannot be the same person / instructor that trained the Pilot(s).

Completion Standards

The pilot must be able to describe, locate, and identify aircraft systems; perform normal, abnormal, and emergency checklists; and demonstrate proficiency with the Garmin G5000 Avionics.

The Partial Proficiency check minimum tasks required include:

1. Check Database expiration dates 2. Display an appropriate Instrument Approach Procedure chart 3. Turn on / off Synthetic Vision System 4. Set V-speeds on airspeed indicator 5. Tune a Communication and Navigation frequency6. Input / change a Transponder code7. Change the altimeter setting8. Set Primary Flight Display from Full to Primary Flight Display / Multi-Function Window (MFW)

and back9. Select full and half mode on Multi-Function Display 10. Select System Synoptics for display11. Select all System Tests12. Load and activate a flight plan including weight functions13. Insert and delete flight plan waypoints 14. Show how to fly direct to a waypoint 15. Program a Vertical Navigation descent 16. Change arrival airport and approach procedure17. Create, Enter, Modify, Depart and Delete a holding pattern 18. Identify Level of Service for a Radio Navigation approach19. Set minimums for an approach20. Change active Navigation source21. Select bearing pointers On / Off22. Select different wind data window formats23. Select / De-Select Angle of Attack 24. De-Clutter inset map display25. Change Navigation Map range on Multi-Function Display

Page 119 of 120

Page 120: Flight Standards Information System (FSIMS) rev1.docx · Web viewU.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, D.C. Flight Standardization Board (FSB)

Revision: 1 05/20/2014Learjet 45 FSB Report

SAMPLE - Minimum Tasks to be Evaluated

Line Oriented Evaluation (LOE)

Evaluator Guidance: Satisfactory completion of the Line Oriented Evaluation requires a minimum score of 80% (corrected to 100% after all tasks have been attempted). If pilot is unable to achieve a minimum score of 80%, additional training will be required.

Place in box: “S” - Satisfactory / “N” - Not Satisfactorily / “Y” – Retrain or Blank if Not RetrainedTask

#Task 1st

AttemptRetrai

n2nd

Attempt1. Check Database expiration dates2. Display an appropriate Instrument Approach Procedure chart3. Turn On / Off Synthetic Vision System4. Set V-speeds on airspeed indicator5. Tune a Communication and Navigation frequency6. Input / Change a Transponder code7. Change the altimeter setting8. Set Primary Flight Display from Full to PFD / MFW and back9. Select full and half mode on Multi-Function Display10. Select System Synoptics for display11. Select all Systems Tests12. Load and activate a flight plan including weights function13. Insert and delete flight plan waypoints14. Show how to fly direct to a waypoint15. Program a Vertical Navigation descent16. Change arrival airport and approach procedure17. Create / Enter / Modify / Depart / Delete a holding pattern18. Identify Level of Service for a Radio Navigation approach19. Set minimums for an approach20. Change active Navigation source21. Select bearing pointers ON / OFF22. Select different wind data window formats23. Select / deselect Angle of Attack24. De-clutter inset map display25. Change Navigation Map range on Multi-Function Display

Note: Completion of an Initial Qualification Course or Recurrent Training Course in a LR-70/75 aircraft, or simulator satisfies the requirements of this Differences Course and Demonstration of Proficiency. A log book entry, Training Record documenting successful completion of the LOE in LR-70/75, Check Ride form for a 61.58 check in a LR-70/75, or a copy of FAA Form FAA 8710-1 in LR-70/75 is required to show completion of training.

Page 120 of 120