Flickr Destinations Similarity

25
www.bournemouth.ac.uk Harvesting User Generated Picture Information To Understand Destination Similarity Dr. Alessandro Inversini School of Tourism Bourbemouth University Dr. Davide Eynard Faculty of Informatics Universitá della Svizzera italiana linkedin.com/in/inversini @beanbol beanbol.com [email protected] June 6 th 2013

description

 

Transcript of Flickr Destinations Similarity

Page 1: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Harvesting User Generated Picture Information To Understand Destination Similarity

Dr. Alessandro Inversini

School of Tourism

Bourbemouth University

Dr. Davide Eynard

Faculty of Informatics

Universitá della Svizzera italiana

linkedin.com/in/inversini

@beanbol

beanbol.com

[email protected]

June 6th 2013

Page 2: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

http://blogs.bournemouth.ac.uk/etourismlab/

www.ifitt.org

Page 3: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

aimTo understand: the importance of the user generated pictures in understanding the destination similarity in order to lead to a possible recommendation of a destination to visit.

pippo

RecSys

Web2.0Picture

Page 4: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

…what’s the role of pictures in tourism?

Page 5: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk“the tourist gaze”

Page 6: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Pictures are essential also for destinations

Page 7: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

• Tourists have technological needs during the all tourism goods consumption process

• Advancements in technologies have made easier to take picture & to share pictures.

What is happening with technologies and social media?

Gretzel et al., 2006

Page 8: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Wed

nesd

ay, M

arch

13,

201

3

Page 9: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Web2.0 & Social Media

i) the web is conceived more as a public square where to connect and exchange opinions instead of a library;

ii) the possibility of publishing contents has been widespread thanks to easy-to-use websites and applications;

iii) the availability of large bandwidth connections makes possible a wider use of multimedia, leading to good quality, interactive content provided by the users themselves. (Cantoni and Tardini, 2009).

Page 10: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Web2.0 & Social Media

Social Media are: “media impressions created by consumers, typically informed by relevant experience, and archived or shared online for easy access by other impressionable consumers” (Blackshaw, 2006)

They represent “a mixture of fact and opinion, impression and sentiment, founded and unfounded tidbits, experiences, and even rumor” (Blackshaw & Nazarro, 2006)

Social media are important as they help spread within the web the electronic Word of Mouth. (Litvin, Goldsmith, & Pan, 2008)

Page 11: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Web2.0 & Social Media

One in two tourists view destination’s photos via UGC in different web communitiesYoo and Gretzel (2009).

For example to understand culture (Pengiran-Kaha et al., 2010) or to recommend a place to visit (Linanza et al., 2011).

According to Xiang and Gretzel (2010) social media are playing a relevant role within travel and tourism search online.

Image and video sharing website count for 3.8% (Inversini and Cantoni 2011).

Page 12: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Flickr.com

Page 13: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Flickr.com

Page 14: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Flickr.com

Page 15: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Flickr.com

Tags: terms used for describing the pictureGeotags: descrption of the location of the picture

Folksonomies and Personomies

The term folksonomy was introduced by Vander Wal (2004), by mixing the terms “folk” and “taxonomy”. Users assign a set of terms called tags to an individual piece of content in order to group or classify it for retrieval (Sturtz, 2004).

The collection of the tags of a single user is called personomy, while the collection of personomies is called folksonomy (Hotho et al., 2006)

Page 16: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Recommendation System

Page 17: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Recommendation System Collaborative filtering, which aggregates data about user preferences (i.e. ratings) to recommend new products. In the specific case of tourism destinations, this would require users to (i) visit a destination and (ii) explicitly provide a rating for it.

Content based filtering (Pazzani & Billsus 2007) mainly exploits user preferences (implicit or explicit) to build a model of user’s interests. For the recommendation of tourism destinations, this would require users to express their preferences (either by booking flights or rooms in different destinations or by explicitly “liking” them). Moreover, a representation of destinations rich enough to distinguish between what the user liked and what she did not would be necessary.

The knowledge-based approach uses knowledge about users and the application domain to reason over product similarity and choose which ones to recommend. In the field of tourism, this would mean finding a metric which exploits external knowledge to define similarity between destinations.

(Lorenzi, Ricci, Tostes and Brasil, 2005)

Page 18: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

So??

What the importance of the user generated pictures in understanding the destination similarity in order to lead to a possible recommendation of a destination to visit?

Page 19: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

• Harvest 233 cities in Flickr.com*– Each city was represented by the collection of all the tags assigned to its

pictures– Information about users (who upload a the given picture)– Information about the pictures (picture sharing the same tag)– Geotags: harvested and used to disambiguate

• 4 sets of data– Top 100 tags (Flickr API picture only tags – System A)– Top 100 tags (Flickr API users information – System B)– “Random tags”(YQL only picture tags – System C)– “Random tags” (YQL users information – System D)

method

*http://www.euromonitor.com/Top_150_City_Destinations_London_Leads_the_Way (2007 and 2008)

Page 20: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

• Vector Space Model was used to represent the cities in terms of their tags.

• Normalize sets (e.g.)

• Calculate similarity

method

Page 21: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

method• Submit sets to a sample of users

51 users296 valid observations

- 47% 25-30 years old- 45% italian- 50.9% expert travellers*

* travelled 5-10 times the previous year

Page 22: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Results

• System C was the more reliable for users• 37,5 % choices given with of confidence

– Highest level of confidence for system C– Lowest level of confidence for system A

Page 23: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Results

• Willingness to recommend a city

Page 24: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Discussion & Conclusion

• It is possible to define similar destinations on the basis of pictures images tags.

• Flickr APIs are not enough for defining destinations’ similarity (SystemC vs SystemA)

BUT

• Information about pictures are enough for defining destination similarity.

• IT IS THEREFORE POSSIBLE to recommend destinations on the basis of the pictures uploaded on social media.

Page 25: Flickr Destinations Similarity

www.bournemouth.ac.uk

Harvesting User Generated Picture Information To Understand Destination Similarity

Dr. Alessandro Inversini

School of Tourism

Bourbemouth University

Dr. Davide Eynard

Faculty of Informatics

Universitá della Svizzera italiana

linkedin.com/in/inversini

@beanbol

beanbol.com

[email protected]

May 22nd 2013