FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

download FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

of 37

Transcript of FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    1/37

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    I N T HE D IS TR IC T C OU RT O F A PP EA L O F T HE S TA TE O F F LO RI DAFOURTH DISTRICT

    ROMAN PINO,

    Appellant,

    v.

    T HE B ANK O F N EW Y OR KM EL LO N, e tc ., e t a l. ,

    Appellee.

    -------------------------------------------/

    ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE:

    HONORABLE GARY M. FARMER, Presiding

    HONORABLE MARTHA C. WARNER

    H ON OR AB LE M AR K E . P OL EN

    Wednesday, November 10, 2010

    1 0: 42 a .m . - 1 1: 23 a .m .

    1 52 5 P al m B ea ch L ak es B ou le va r d

    W es t P al m B ea ch , F lo ri da 3 34 01

    Reported By:L uc il le H ut tl e, R PR , F PRN ot ar y P ub li c S ta te o f F lo ri daJ . C on so r & A ss oc ia te s R ep or ti ng & T ra ns cr ip ti onW es t P al m B ea ch O ff ic ePhone 561.682.0905

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    2/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    2

    APPEARANCES:

    O n B eh al f o f t he A pp el la ntE NR IQ UE N IE VE S, I II , E S Q.I C E L EG AL , P .A .

    1 01 5 N . S ta te R oa d, S ui te D

    R oy al P al m B ea ch , F lo ri da 3 34 11

    O n B eh al f o f t he A pp el le eKATHERINE E. GIDDINGS, ESQ.K EN T F RA ZE R, E SQ .AKERMAN SENTERFITT, LLP

    1 06 E as t C ol le ge A ve nu e, S ui te 1 20 0P os t O ff ic e B ox 1 87 7 ( 32 30 2 -1 87 7)Tallahassee, Florida 32301

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    3/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    3

    P R O C E E D I N G S:

    - - -

    J UD GE F AR ME R: O ur n ex t c a se i s P i no a ga in st

    BNY.

    M R. N I EV ES : G oo d m or ni ng .

    J UDG E F ARM ER : G oo d m or ni ng . W elc om e t o t he

    Fourth District to everyone.

    MR . N I EV ES: M ay i t p l ea se t he C ou rt , m y n am e

    i s E nr iq ue N ie ve s w it h I ce L eg al , a nd I r ep re se nt t he

    a pp el la nt R om an P in o. I w ou ld l ik e t o r es er ve f ou r

    minutes for rebuttal.

    J UDG E FA RM ER : Y ou g ot i t. Y ou h av e fi ft ee n

    m in ut es t ot al , s o y ou 'l l h av e p le nt y o f t im e t o

    present your case.

    MR . N IE VE S: T he re a re tw o m ai n i s su es i n t hi s

    c as e. F ir st , t he re 's R om an P in o' s m ot io n t o s tr ik e

    t he b an k' s n ot ic e o f v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al , a ll eg e a

    c ol or ab le e nt it le me nt t o r el ie f w he n i t a ll eg ed t ha t

    p la in ti ff f or ge d t he d oc um en t a nd f il ed i t a s

    e vi de nc e i n t hi s c as e. If s o, t hen t ha t w ou ld

    require an evidentiary hearing.

    T he o th er i s a n i nt er re la te d s ub - is su e, w hi ch

    is : D oe s a l it iga nt t ha t r el ie s o n f or ged ,

    f ab ri ca te d p ro of n ee d t o s uc ce ss fu ll y m is le ad t he

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    4/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    4

    C ou rt i n o rd er f or t he i nn oc en t p ar ty t o s tr ik e t he

    v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al u nd er R ul e 1 .5 40 ? I n o th er

    w or ds , m us t t he f ra ud b e s uc ce ss fu l? T he se a re b ot h

    l eg al i ss ue s o f t he s ta nd ar d r ev ie ws o f d e n ov o.

    A nd g iv in g a l it tl e b it o f b ac kg ro un d, t he

    p la in ti ff f il ed a c om pl ai nt a ll eg in g t ha t t he y o wn

    t he m or tg ag e b y v ir tu e o f a n a ss ig nm en t t o b e

    r ec or de d. T he a tt ac he d m or tg ag e s ho we d a d if fe re nt

    e nt it y a s a m or tg ag ee , a nd i t a ls o c la im ed t ha t t he

    p ro mi ss or y n ot e h a d b ee n l os t, d es tr oy ed o r s to le n.

    A cc or di ng ly , P in o m ov ed t o d is mi ss t he c om pl ai nt

    because the alleged assignment wasn't attached

    s ho wi ng c ha ng e o f t it le . T he b an k a m en de d t h e

    c om pl ai nt t o f ix t he d ef ec t a nd a tt ac he d a n

    u nr ec or de d a ss ig nm en t o f m or tg ag e. T he a ss ig nm en t o f

    m or tg ag e p ur po rt ed t o b e e xe cu te d f iv e d ay s b ef or e

    t he c as e w as f il ed .

    P in o t he n m ov ed t o d is mi ss t he c om pl ai nt a nd

    sought sanctions because the assignment of mortgage

    w as f ra ud ul en tl y b ac kd at ed . P in o s et t he d ep os it io n

    o f s ev er al n ot ar ie s a nd w it ne ss es , a ll e mp lo ye es o f

    t he L aw O ff ic e o f D av id S te rn , w hi ch i s B NY M el lo n,

    th e b an k' s c ou ns el . A nd o n t he e ve of t he

    d ep os it io ns , t h e b an k f il ed a n ot ic e o f v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al i n t h e c as e .

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    5/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    5

    S in ce t he n, a n i de nt ic al a ct i on h as b ee n f il ed

    a ga in st P in o w it h t he s am e p la in ti ff s ui ng o n t he

    s am e m o r tg ag e. T h e c o mp la in ts a re v ir tu al ly

    i de nt ic al , e xc ep t i t n ow d oe sn 't p le ad t ha t t he n ot e

    is lo st . A nd n ot ic ea bl y a bs en t f ro m t he ne w c as e i s

    the fraudulent assignment of mortgage.

    J UD GE P OL EN : M r. N ie ve s, d id t he n ew l aw su it

    pl ea d t he s ame p er iod o f d ef au lt ? O r wa s it al le gi ng

    a n ew d ef au lt i n p ay me nt s?

    MR . N IE VE S: I b el ie ve i t w as th e s am e, t he

    s ame e xa ct - - I b el ie ve it w as i de nt ic al. I do n' t

    b el ie ve t ha t i t p le d n ew d ef au lt s, a s f ar a s m y

    understanding.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: I n o th er w or ds , t he y d id n' t

    c la im a d ef au lt t ha t a ro se a ft er t he y v ol un ta ri ly

    d is mi ss ed t he ir f ir st m or tg ag e i n t he ir s ec on d

    lawsuit.

    M R. N IE VE S: I b el ie ve t he y d id n' t.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: O ka y.

    MR . N IEVE S: So, now in its place is a new

    assignment that postdates a voluntary dismissal, but

    d oe s n ot m en ti on o r e ve n r ef er t o a p re vi ou s

    a ss ig nm en t. S o, P in o t he n m ov ed t o s tr ik e t he n ot ic e

    of voluntary dismissal and requested an evidentiary

    h ea ri ng t o d em on st ra te t he f ra ud , a nd t ha t B N Y

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    6/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    6

    M el lo n' s c ou ns el c re at ed , e xe cu te d a nd f il ed a

    fraudulently backdated assignment of mortgage, and

    t hat t he re w as f rau d on th e C o ur t. It a ls o s ou gh t t o

    d is mi ss t he c as e w it h p re ju di ce . S o, u lt im at el y,

    t hi s c ou rt m us t l oo k t o t he a ll eg at io ns o f t he m ot io n

    to determine colorable entitlement.

    A nd i f i t h as n' t b ee n c le ar f ro m w ha t I 'v e

    s ai d, t he a ll eg at io ns a re t ha t t he L aw O ff ic e o f

    David Stern forged documents, created and executed

    a nd f il ed t he f ra ud ul en tl y b ac kd at ed a ss ig nm en t. T he

    ot he r p ar t o f i t i s: T he a ss ig nm en t p urp or ts t o

    t ra ns fe r p ro pe rt y i nt er es t t o D av id S te rn ' s o wn

    c li en t, w hi ch i s, u nd er s om e c as e l aw , t he p ri ma ry

    e vi de nc e i n o ne o f t he se t yp es o f f or ec lo su re c as es .

    Further --

    J UD GE P OL EN : I 'm a fr ai d I ' m n ot f ol lo wi ng

    t hat . D av id S te rn 's c li en t a t t he t im e w as B NY

    Mellon Bank, right?

    MR . N IE VE S: Y es .

    J UDG E P OL EN : O ka y. A nd t ha t' s ev id en ce o f

    w ha t, a n a ss ig nm en t t o a b an k?

    M R. N IE VE S: B as ic al ly , t h e l a w f i rm

    manufactured evidence for the client's case.

    J UD GE PO LE N: O ka y.

    MR . N IE VE S: I t w as s ig ned a nd e xe cu te d b y

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    7/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    7

    C he ry l S am on s, w ho w or ks f or D av id S te rn , a nd

    executed the assignment solely for the litigation,

    a nd , i n t he a ss ig nm en t, p os ed a s a n o ff ic er o f a

    different entity.

    J UDG E P OL EN : L et m e g o to t hi s b ec au se y ou r

    m ot io n w as d en ie d , s o t he re w as n ev er a n e vi de nt ia ry

    hearing, obviously.

    M R. N I EV ES : N o, t he re w as n' t.

    J UD GE P OL EN : W as t he re a ny th in g i n t h e m o ti on

    t ha t r ef le ct s, o r a ny r ec or d t ha t w e h av e, a s f ar

    as -- I d on 't k no w i f t he re w as a tr an sc ri pt of t he

    h ea ri ng o n t he m ot io n b ef or e J ud ge S as se r .

    MR . N IE VE S: Y es , t he re w as .

    J UD GE P OL EN : - - h o w y ou r f i rm a tt ai ne d t h at ?

    Y ou n ev er g ot t o t ak e t h e d ep os it io ns b ec au se t he y

    d is mi ss ed t hr ee d ay s b ef or e t he d ep os it io ns w er e

    s ch ed ul ed t o b e h el d.

    M R. N IE VE S: I t' s pr et ty i nt er es ti ng . I 'l l

    e xpl ai n t o y ou w hy w e k ne w w ha t w e k ne w.

    T he re w er e a c ou pl e t hi ng s t ha t w e a lr ea dy

    k new , o r I s ho ul d s ay s ev er al . O ne , t ha t t he n ot ar y

    o n t he a ss ig nm en t w or ke d f or D on na E ve rt z w ho w as t he

    a tt or ne y w ho w a s h an dl in g t he c as e i n t he l it i ga ti on

    d ep ar tm en t. W e k ne w t ha t t he l it ig at io n d ep ar tm en t

    d id n ot h an dl e c as es u nt il t he y w er e c o nt es te d, a nd

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    8/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    8

    w e a ls o k ne w t ha t D on na E ve rt z w as a ss ig ne d a ll o f

    o ur c as es o nc e w e b ec am e i nv ol ve d.

    S o, w e b eg an l oo ki ng a t r ec or ds t o s ho w t ha t

    t he re 's n o w ay M ic he ll e G ra nt ( ph on et ic ) w ou ld h av e

    n ot ar iz ed t he se t yp es o f a ss ig nm en ts b ec au se i t w ou ld

    h av e n ec es sa ri ly h ad t o e xi st b ef or e t he y w er e e ve r

    in he r d ep art me nt . A nd w ha t w e f ou nd w ere 2 1 c as es

    w he re t he n ot ar y s ta mp w as n ot i ss ue d a t t he t im e o f

    the alleged assignment notarization.

    S o, b as ic al ly , t o e xp la in i t b et te r, t he n ot ar y

    s ay s i t' s d at ed i n J an ua ry , t he s ta mp w as n' t i ss ue d

    un ti l M ay . T ho se a re t he t yp es o f c as es w e f o un d.

    So , w e k ne w t ha t, g iv en al l t he p la ye rs i n t he

    l it ig at io n d ep ar tm en t , w e k ne w t ha t i t w as c le ar t ha t

    t hi s w as o ne o f t he c as es t ha t i t w as a f ra ud ul en tl y

    backdated assignment.

    J UDG E P OL EN : T hi s m ay b e g oi ng o ut si de t he

    record. If it is , p erhaps we --

    MR . N I EV ES: A nd I 'm j us t a ns we ri ng a s t o h ow

    w e f ig ur ed i t o ut .

    J UD GE P OL EN : T he se m at te rs c on ta in ed i n

    M r. S te rn 's l aw f ir m a re t he s ub je ct o f a n

    i nv es ti ga ti on b y t he A tt or ne y G en er al , a re t he y n ot ?

    MR . N IE VE S: Y es , t he y a re .

    J UD GE PO LE N: O ka y.

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    9/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    9

    MR . N I EV ES: S o, I t hi nk , a t t hi s p o in t, i t' s

    c le ar w ha t t he m ot io n a ll eg es .

    J UDG E P OL EN : W el l, w e n ee d t o g et t o t he m ea t

    o f t he m at te r, w hi ch i s: Y ou r o pp on en t o b vi ou sl y i s

    g oi ng t o a rg ue t ha t t he re i s a n u nq ua li fi ed r ig ht t o

    t ak e a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al , a nd t he T ri al C ou rt h as

    n o j ur is di ct io n t o g o b ey on d t ha t, w hi ch i s w ha t

    J ud ge S as se r h a s r ul ed .

    MR . N IE VE S: A nd t he l owe r c ou rt fe lt i ts h an ds

    w er e t i ed . I t m i st ak en ly r el ie d o n B ev an v .

    D 'A le ss an dr o, w hi ch w as a c as e w he re t he re w as a l ac k

    o f p ro se cu ti on , a m ot io n t ha t w as a n o rd er t o s ho w

    c au se w it hi n f iv e d ay s, a nd t he n t he p la in ti ff

    v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss ed t h e c as e t o a vo id t h e l ac k o f

    prosecution.

    S o, t ha t c as e p it te d t he v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al

    r ul e v e rs us t he l ac k o f p r os ec ut io n r u le . A nd i n

    t ha t c as e, t he C ou rt h el d t ha t t he v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al r ul e t ru mp ed t he l ac k o f p ro se cu ti on r ul e.

    A nd i t a ls o n ot ed i n t ha t c as e, a nd i t d is ti ng ui sh ed

    p ri or c as es r ec og ni zi ng t he f ra ud e xc ep ti on , i n p ar t,

    b ec au se t he B ev an c as e d id n ot r is e t o t he l ev el o f

    f ra ud , t ha t t he a ll eg at io ns d id n ot r is e t o t he l ev el

    of fr au d. I t w as l ac k o f p ro se cu ti on, a nd t her e w as

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    10/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    10

    n o a ll eg at io n o f f ra ud i nv ol ve d.

    T he m ai n c as e t ha t b as ic al ly r ec og ni ze s t he

    f ra ud a s a n e xc ep ti on w he re y ou c an s tr ik e a

    v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al i s t he S el ec t B ui ld er s o f

    F lor id a v . W on g c as e. A nd i n t h at c as e, th e

    p la in ti ff h ad o bt ai ne d a n o rd er e xp un gi ng a n

    i nj un ct io n. A nd i t t u rn ed o ut t ha t t h er e m ay h av e

    b ee n f ra ud o n t he C ou rt a nd c er ta in p ro ce du ra l

    i rr eg ul ar it ie s , s o t h e C ou rt v ac at ed t h e p re vi ou s

    order.

    T he d ef en da nt t he n m ov ed f o r s an ct io ns a ga in st

    t he p la in ti ff c on te nd in g t ha t i t m is le ad t he C ou rt

    a nd t ha t t he re w er e p ro ce du ra l i rr eg ul ar it ie s . T he n

    t he C ou rt o rd er ed t he p ar ti es t o t ak e s te ps t o p la ce

    t he r ea l e st at e i n s ta tu s q uo a nd r eq ui re t he d ep os it

    o f m on ey t ha t w as r ec ei ve d f ro m t he s al e o f t he

    p ro pe rt y t o a t hi rd p ar ty . A nd t he p la in ti ff

    voluntarily dismissed the case.

    J UD GE W AR NE R: W el l, i n t h at c as e, t he i ss ue

    th er e i s w he th er o r n ot yo u n ee d, i n o ne o f t he se

    circumstances, to attack a voluntary dismissal that

    a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f h a s a lr ea dy b ee n o bt ai ne d a s a

    r es ul t o f s ome p ro bl em i n c ou rt . I m ea n, i sn 't t ha t

    t he b as ic h ol di ng o f S el ec t B ui ld er s, o r a t l ea st h ow

    it's interpreted, that because affirmative relief was

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    11/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    11

    o bt ai ne d, t ha t' s w hy t he y w er e a ll ow ed , i n t ha t c as e,

    u nd er , b as ic al ly , " in he re nt p ow er o f t h e C ou rt " k in d

    o f t he or y, t o g o b ey on d t he v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss al ?

    M R. N IE VE S: W el l, t he r ea so n t he y w e re a ll ow ed

    to wa s t o p rev en t f ra ud on t he C ou rt . A nd o ne t hi ng

    t ha t i s i mp or ta nt i s t ha t t he C ou rt h ad a lr ea dy

    v ac at ed t he o rd er e xp la in in g t he i nj un ct io n a t t he

    t im e o f t he v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al .

    S o, u nd er m os t d ef in it io ns o f a ff ir ma ti ve

    r el ie f, t ha t w o ul d h a ve b ee n i t . T he y h ad a lr ea dy

    fi xe d w ha t t he y h ad d on e w ro ng . B ut t he w ho le p oi nt

    in th e c ou rt f or th e c as e t o b e r ei ns tat ed w as t o

    a ddr es s t he i ss ue s o f f ra ud . T he C ou rt h ad t he

    d is cr et io n t o d ea l w it h f ra ud i ss ue s a n d p re ve nt

    i nj us ti ce i n t hi s c ou rt .

    A nd a s f ar a s a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f, t he S el ec t

    B ui ld er s c a se d oe s n o t m a ke i t a r eq ui re me nt . I t

    r ec og ni ze s t h e e xc ep ti on . I t n o w he re s ay s t h a t

    affirmative relief is required.

    J UD GE W AR NE R: W el l, t ha t' s o n e o f t h e r ea so ns

    wh y i t r ef er s t o s om e o f t he o th er c as es he re . I t

    says, We've examined the following authorities, and

    f in d i t a pp li ca bl e. A nd t he n i t s ay s, F ir st , t h e

    p la in ti ff i n t h e c it ed c as es h as n ot r ec ei ve d

    a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f f ro m a n e qu it y c ou rt . A nd ,

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    12/37

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    13/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    13

    t he y t ri ed t o u se t he r ul e t o h id e t he ir f ra ud ul en t

    a cts . A nd a tt em pt ed f ra ud i s s ti ll f rau d. W e j us t

    h ap pe ne d t o c at ch t he m.

    A nd n ot t o g o t oo f ar b ey on d t he sc op e, b ut

    w he n w e w er e r es ea rc hi ng t hi s a nd w e f ou nd t ho se

    21 cases, we just stopped. It was -- it wasn 't a

    m at te r o f i t t oo k a ll y ea r. T hi s w as, on i ts f ac e,

    t hi s w as h ap pe ni ng e ve ry wh er e. A nd , p ar ti cu la rl y, i n

    an ar ea o f l aw t ha t i s h ea vy o n p ro se d ef en dan ts ,

    t hi s i s d ef in it el y a n i ss ue t ha t n ee ds t o b e

    a dd re ss ed . A nd i t a ct ua ll y - - a nd t aki ng a ny t yp e o f

    j ud ic ia l n ot ic e o f t h e i nv es ti ga ti on , w e b el ie ve i t' s

    s yst em at ic . I t's a p ol ic y. I t w as n't -- I b el ie ve ,

    i n t he a rg um en t b el ow , o pp os in g c ou ns el u se d t he t er m

    "e mp ty h ea d b ut n ot e vi l h ea rt ." Th is w as t he ir

    p ol ic y a nd p ro ce du re . T hi s i s w hat t he y di d on

    purpose.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: Y ou 'r e g e tt in g d ow n t o w he re y ou

    only have a minute left. And I'd like to see -- you

    as ke d f or m ore t im e f or re bu tt al . S o, m ay I s ug ge st

    t hat w e - - w hy d on 't we h ea r f ro m t he o th er s id e n ow ,

    an d I 'l l g iv e y ou an e xt ra m in ut e o r s o i f y ou n ee d

    it to d o a ny s um mi ng up .

    M R. N IE VE S: O ka y, t ha t' ll w or k.

    J UD GE F A RM ER : T ha nk y o u.

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    14/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    14

    MS . G ID DI NG S: G oo d m or ni ng , Y ou r H on or s. M ay

    i t p le as e t he C ou rt .

    J UD GE F AR ME R: G oo d m o rn in g.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: I 'm K at he ri ne G id di ng s. I 'm

    h er e t od ay w it h K en t F ra ze r o f A ke rm an S en te rf it t.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: G oo d m o rn in g.

    MS . G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H ono rs , t hi s is a n e as y

    c ase . T hi s i s n ot a bo ut t he C ou rt 's i nt eg ri ty . T hi s

    is ab ou t w he n y ou c an g o a nd r eo pen a c ase u nd er t he

    a bs ol ut e r ig ht t ha t a p ar ty h as t o t ak e a v ol un ta ry

    dismissal.

    I n oti ce d t ha t m y - - w el l, l et m e a ns we r

    J ud ge P ol en 's q ue st io n a b ou t t he n ew c as e. I t hi nk

    y ou 'r e p ro ba bl y g et ti ng i nt o t he f ac t t ha t e ve n i f

    t hi s c as e w as d is mi ss ed w it h p re ju di ce , t ha t i t c ou ld

    be re fi le d. T he re li ef t ha t i s s ou gh t in t he s ec on d

    c as e d oe s g o b ac k t o t he s am e d ef au lt d at e, b ut t he re

    is a c on ti nu in g d e fa ul t in t hi s c as e. A nd s o,

    b ec au se t he d ef au lt i s c on ti nu in g a nd t he re h av e b ee n

    n o p ay me nt s, t he n t he s ui t c an b e r ef il ed .

    J UD GE P OL EN : T he or et ic al ly , y ou c ou ld f il e a

    n ew l aw su it e ve ry m on th , c ou ld n' t y ou ?

    MS . G ID DI NG S: Y es , s ir . An d I b e li ev e t ha t' s

    w ha t t he S up re me C ou rt h as h el d.

    J UDG E POL EN : H er e' s my c on ce rn: I n yo ur

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    15/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    15

    o pe ni ng c om me nt t ha t t hi s i s n ot a bo ut t he i nt eg ri ty

    o f t he C ou rt , I c an 't i ma gi ne a m at te r t ha t w ou ld n ot

    b e m or e d ir ec te d t o t he i nt eg ri ty o f t he C ou rt i f t he

    a ll eg at io ns i n t he m ot io n t o s tr ik e c an b e p ro ve n.

    T he re w as n ev er a n o pp or tu ni ty t o h av e a n

    e vi de nt ia ry h ea ri ng , b ut y ou r c li en t e ng ag ed a l aw ye r

    by th e n a me of D avi d S te rn . O bv io us ly , h e i s n o

    longer representing him, but your client's actions

    ar e g ov er ne d b y w ho t he y h ad a s t he ir a ge nt a t t he

    time.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y es , si r.

    J UDG E P OL EN : A nd i f, i n f ac t, M r. S te rn 's

    o ff ic e d id t he t hi ng s t ha t t he a pp el la nt i n t hi s c as e

    i s a ll eg in g t he y d id , t ha t' s e xt re me ly d et ri me nt al t o

    t he f un ct io n o f t he c ou rt s i n m et in g o ut j us ti ce ,

    p ar ti cu la rl y, i n t he m at te r t ha t M r. N i ev es h as

    suggested, with the incredible load of foreclosure

    c as es t ha t t he c ou rt s ys te m i n F lo ri da i s f ac in g - -

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y es , si r.

    J UDG E P OL EN : - - t o k no w t ha t n ot j us t o ne , b ut

    p er ha ps d oz en s o r h un dr ed s o f l aw su it s f il ed i n

    c ou rt s w it h f ra ud ul en t d oc um en ts a re b ei ng u se d a s a

    b as is t o g et f or ec lo su re s a ga in st p eo pl e w ho d on 't

    h av e t he b en ef it o f M r. N ie ve s' l aw f ir m t o r ep re se nt

    them.

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    16/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    16

    MS . G ID DI NG S: Y es , s ir , a nd t ha t i s a c on ce rn.

    B ut w he n yo u l oo k a t -- t he C ou rt a lw ay s h as

    a ut ho ri ty t o c o nt ro l i ts c ou rt ro om . A nd w he n I s ai d

    t hi s w as n ot a bo ut t he i nt eg ri ty o f t he C ou rt , w ha t I

    m ea nt w as t ha t u nd er t he f ac ts o f t hi s p ar ti cu la r

    c as e, t he C ou rt a lw a ys h as r em ed ie s o f h ol di ng

    l aw ye rs i n c on te mp t, i t a lw ay s c an r ef er t he m t o t he

    F lo ri da B ar . T he re a re o th er r em ed ie s t ha t c a n b e

    ta ke n. B ut t he i ss ue i n t h is c as e i s w het he r y o u c a n

    take a voluntary dismissal.

    A nd I w ou ld l ik e y ou to p ut t hi s in t he c on te xt

    of a m ot io n t o v ac ate a fi na l j u dg men t. Wh en y ou

    c om e i n a nd a sk t o v ac at e a f in al j ud gm en t, y ou c an 't

    j ust s ay f ra ud on t he C ou rt o cc ur re d. Y ou h av e t o

    s ay m at er ia l f r au d o n t h e C ou rt o cc ur re d t ha t

    r es ul te d i n y ou o bt ai ni ng a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f. T he

    s am e t hi ng w ou ld o cc ur w it h a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al .

    I f t he re w as n o r el ie f o bt ai ne d, t he n y ou c an 't g o

    b ac k a nd r eo pe n t ha t c as e.

    J UD GE P OL EN : B ut y ou r c l ie nt d id g et r el ie f.

    T he y d id n' t h av e t o s ub mi t t o d ep os it io ns .

    MS . G ID DI NG S: Y es , s ir , b ut y ou 're - - w el l, we

    h av e t he a bs ol ut e r ig ht - - y ou c an a lw ay s a vo id a n

    a dv er se r ul in g f ro m t he C ou rt b y t ak in g a v ol un ta ry

    dismissal.

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    17/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    17

    J UD GE P OL EN : B ut y ou c ha ra ct er iz ed t ha t a s t he

    is su e o f t he c as e. I d i sa gr ee . I d on 't q ue st io n

    t ha t y o u c an t ak e a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al . T he i ss ue ,

    as I s ee i t, i s w he th er a C ou rt , o n s ub se qu ent

    information, can strike that dismissal.

    MS . GI DD IN GS : Y es , sir , Yo ur H on or . B ut i f

    yo u - - a nd I w ou ld c al l to y ou r a tt ent io n t he - - w e

    filed a notice of supplemental authority yesterday.

    I a po lo gi ze f or t he l at e f il in g o f t ha t n o ti ce. W e

    d is co ve re d i t w he n - - a ll t he c as es i nv ol vi ng t hi s

    i ss ue a re f ro m t h e ' 8 0s . W e d i sc ov er ed t hi s

    particular case yesterday, and we hand-delivered a

    c op y t o c ou ns el w ho t ol d m e, b ef or e t he o ra l

    a rg um en t, t ha t h e h ad s ee n t he c as e s om e t im e a go .

    Y ou r Ho no rs , I w ou ld l ik e t o r ea d t o y ou f ro m

    this case. It says, at the bottom of page 6, in the

    s er vi ce e xp er ts c as e - -

    J UD GE P OL EN : Y ou 'r e t a l ki n g a b ou t s e r vi ce

    experts?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y es , si r.

    At t he b ot to m o f p ag e 6 it s ay s, Un li ke S el ec t

    B ui ld er s, t hi s i s n ot a c as e w he re t he p la in ti ff

    e ng ag ed i n f ra ud w hi ch r es ul te d i n a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f

    f ro m t he C ou rt , a nd i n o bt ai ni ng t ha t r el ie f

    v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss ed t h e c as e t o p re ve nt t he C ou rt

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    18/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    18

    f ro m t ak in g t he i l l- go tt en r el ie f. W it ho ut e vi de nc e

    o f i ll -g ot te n r el ie f c on ne ct ed t o t he f ra ud

    allegation, the defendant's allegations were

    i ns uf fi ci en t t o s up po rt s tr ik in g t he n o ti ce o f

    v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al o n t he b as is o f f ra ud .

    N ow , I t hi nk i t' s v er y, v er y i mp or ta nt f or y ou

    t o u nd er st an d t he f ac tu al s it ua ti on i n w hi ch t hi s

    o cc ur re d. C ou ns el m o ve d t o d is mi ss t h is c a se . T he y

    d id n' t a sk f or a d is mi ss al w it ho ut p re ju di ce . T he y

    as ke d f o r a d is mi ssa l. An d b a se d o n l ac k of

    s ta nd in g, d ue t o a f ra ud ul en t a ss ig nm en t, a v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al w as t ak en , a nd t he y d id n ot m ov e t o s tr ik e

    t he v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al . T he y d id n ot m ov e f o r

    s an ct io ns t o d is mi ss t he c as e w it h p re ju di ce . W ha t

    t hey d id w as t he y a sk ed fo r a tt or ne ys f ees . An d

    a ft er t he y r ec ei ve d a d et er mi na ti on t ha t t he y w er e

    e nt it le d t o a tt or ne ys f ee s, a nd a ft er t he n ew c as e

    w as f il ed , t he y s ai d, O h, w el l, w e d on 't w an t t he

    C ou rt a dd re ss in g t hi s i n t he s ec on d c as e, w e' re g on na

    c ome b ac k h ere to t he f ir st c as e a nd a sk th at i t b e

    reopened.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: B ut d oe sn 't R ul e 1 . 54 0 a l lo w u p

    to a y ea r?

    MS . G IDDINGS: Yes, sir , i t does allow up to a

    year. But I would suggest to you that there is a

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    19/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    19

    c as e, D yn as ty E xp re ss C or po ra ti on , t ha t i s c it ed b y

    m y o pp on en ts t ha t w as i ss ue d b y t hi s c ou rt i n 1 99 6,

    i n w hi ch J ud ge W ar ne r a nd J ud ge P ol en w er e o n t he

    pa ne l. A nd t he y s ta te d t ha t a p ar ty h as a n

    o bl ig at io n t o r ai se t he i ss ue o f f ra ud a s s oo n a s i s

    r ea so na bl y p os si bl e. A nd w ai ti ng u nt il a n ew c as e i s

    f il ed f iv e m on th s l at er , t he C ou rt i n t he n ew c as e

    c ou ld a dd re ss - - y ou k no w, c an l oo k a t w he th er t hi s

    i ss ue s ho ul d b e m at er ia l t o t ha t.

    A nd w e a ll - - I t hi nk w e c an t ak e j ud ic ia l

    n ot ic e o f t he f ac t t ha t M r. S te rn 's o ff ic e i s b ei ng

    t ho ro ug hl y i nv es ti ga te d. B ut I a ls o t hi nk t ha t i t' s

    v er y, v er y i mp or ta nt f or y ou t o u nd er st an d , t oo , t ha t

    t he a ss ig nm en t o f m or tg ag e i n t hi s c as e i s n ot

    ultimately material and determinative in the outcome

    of th e c as e, b ec au se it is t he h ol de r o f th e n ot e

    t ha t h as - - t he a ss ig nm en t o f m or tg ag e f ol lo ws t he

    n ote . A nd i f, on t he d ay t ha t y o u' re b ef or e th e

    C ou rt o r w it h y ou r s um ma ry j ud gm en t, y o u s ub mi t t he

    n ot e a nd t he n ot e i s e nd or se d i n b la nk o r e nd or se d t o

    y ou r c li en t, t he n t he a ss ig nm en t o f m or tg ag e d oe s n ot

    control.

    S o, t he re a re n um er ou s r ea so ns w hy t he a ll eg ed

    f ra ud i n t hi s c as e d oe s n ot i mp ac t t he o ut co me o f

    this case. So , e ven if you went back and you --

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    20/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    20

    J UDG E F A RM ER : W el l, t he y s ur e w en t t o a l ot of

    t ro ub le t o m ak e u p a n i ns tr um en t t ha t t he y d id n' t

    n ee d t o d o a ny th in g w it h.

    MS . G ID DI NG S: W el l, Y ou r H on or, if y ou l oo k at

    t he a ll eg at io ns t ha t t he y h av e m ad e, a lm os t a ll o f

    t ho se a ll eg at io ns p er ta in t o a d if fe re nt c as e .

    T he y' re n ot t hi s p ar ti cu la r c as e. I d on 't k no w w ha t

    t ha t d oc um en t - - w ha t o cc ur re d i n t ha t d oc um en t. B ut

    I t hi nk t hi s c ou rt i s p ro ba bl y g oi ng t o h av e a n um be r

    o f c as es t ha t c om e u p b ef or e i t w he re t ha t i ss ue

    i s - - i t m ay b e a t i ss ue i n s ub se qu en t p ro ce ed in gs .

    A nd w he n y ou r eo pe n - - i f y ou 'r e g oi ng t o r eo pe n

    t ho se c as es , y ou h av e t o m ak e s ur e t ha t y ou 'r e

    r eo pe ni ng i t f o r s om et hi ng t ha t i s m at er ia l.

    J UDG E F A RM ER : F ra ud on t he C ou rt i s n ot

    material?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H o no r, f ra ud o n t h e

    C ou rt - -

    J UD GE F AR ME R: P ub li sh in g f a l se d oc um en ts i s

    not material?

    MS . G ID DI NG S: F ra ud on t he C ou rt d id n ot o ccu r

    i n t hi s c as e.

    J UD GE F A RM ER : I t d id n' t.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: A d oc um en t w a s f i le d, b ut

    n oth in g w as e ve r h ea rd b ef or e t he C ou rt . A nd i f y ou

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    21/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    21

    l oo k a t t he s er vi ce e xp er t' s c as e - -

    J UD GE F AR ME R: L et 's j us t c o nf ro nt t ha t f o r a

    m in ut e. I m ea n, t o t h e ex te nt t hat t he c as es t ha t

    y ou t al k a bo ut , S el e ct , a nd t he o th er s t al k a bo ut ,

    a nd t ha t i s, a c hi ev in g a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f a nd a ll

    t ha t s tu ff , I 'm w on de ri ng i f t he y' re n o t j us t t al ki ng

    a bo ut t wo d if fe re nt t hi ng s a s t wo s ep ar at e g ro un ds .

    I n o th er w or ds , o bt ai ni ng o r u si ng v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al a ft er y o u' v e a lr ea dy g ot te n r el ie f i n s om e

    w ay m ay b e o ne k in d o f p ie ce o f v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al ,

    b ut n ot u nd er a n e nt ir el y s ep ar at e k in d m ay b e f ra ud

    o r a tt em pt ed f ra ud o n t he C ou rt .

    I do n' t k no w w hy w e w ou ld a do pt a r ul e o f o ur

    i nh er en t p ow er s t o d ea l w it h f ra ud i n t he C ou rt , w hy

    we wo ul d e ng ag e i n a r ea di ng t ha t sa ys o nl y i f t he

    fr au d p ro ve s t o h av e b ee n s uc ce ss fu l. A nd t ha t i s t o

    s ay i f t he r ep re se nt ee r el ie d, t o i ts d et ri me nt , o n

    t he f ra ud a nd c ha ng ed t he ir p os it io n a n d d id s tu ff ,

    o nly t he n w ou ld w e a ll ow r el ie f o f a ny k in d. T ha t

    s tri ke s m e a s n ot --

    M S. G ID DI NG S: W el l, Y ou r H o no r, l oo k a t t he

    s ta nd ar d f or v ac at in g a j ud gm en t. I t d oe sn 't s ay

    t ha t y ou c an v ac at e a j ud gm en t i f a ny f ra ud o cc ur re d.

    I t s ay s t ha t t he f ra ud m us t b e m at er ia l.

    J UDG E F ARM ER : W el l, I t ho ug ht w ha t w e w er e

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    22/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    22

    d ea li ng w it h h er e w as , r ea ll y, j ur is di ct io n. I

    t ho ug ht t he T ri al C ou rt b as ic al ly s ai d t ha t s he h ad

    l os t j ur is di ct io n t o c on si de r t hi s c as e b ec au se i t

    w as a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al , a nd , t he re fo re , d i d n ot

    receive evidence and wouldn't allow an evidentiary

    hearing to proceed.

    MS . G I DD IN GS : Y ou r H o no r, if yo u l o ok a t t h e

    M il le r c as e f ro m t he F lo ri da S up re me C ou rt , i t s ay s

    t he C ou rt h as j ur is di ct io n t o d et er mi ne w he th er i t

    ha s j ur is di ct io n t o o pe n t he c as e. A nd i n t hi s c as e,

    i f t he C ou rt h ad - - i f t he y h ad o bt ai ne d a ff ir ma ti ve

    r el ie f, i f t he y h ad g on e a ll t he w ay t hr ou gh , t hi s

    f ra ud w ou ld n ev er h av e b ee n d is co ve re d. A nd t he y

    w ent a ll t he w ay an d g ot a j ud gm ent . An d t he n a ft er

    t he j ud gm en t w as o bt ai ne d a nd t he f ra ud w as

    d is co ve re d l at er , y ou c ou ld n ot g o b ac k a nd v ac at e

    t ha t j ud gm en t u nl es s t he f ra ud w as r el ev an t t o t he

    affirmative relief that they obtained.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: A nd a f al se a ss ig nm en t w ou ld n ot

    have been relevant?

    MS . G I DD IN GS : I t w o uld d ep en d o n t he

    individual circumstances.

    J UDG E F A RM ER : S o, w hy do n' t w e n ee d a n

    e vi de nt ia ry h ea ri ng i n t hi s c as e? W hy d on 't w e n e ed

    a t ri al j ud ge t o g o t hr ou gh ( a) i f t he re wa s a f ra ud ,

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    23/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    23

    a nd ( b) w ha t i ts e ff ec ts w er e?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: B ec au se t he re w as n o a ff ir ma ti ve

    r el ie f o b ta in ed i n t h is c as e, Y ou r H o no r. A nd , i n

    f ac t, t he r el ie f w as t ha t M r. P in o h as b ee n l iv in g i n

    t he h ou se f or a l on g t im e, a pp ar en tl y w it ho ut m ak in g

    any payments.

    A nd I u nd er st an d y ou r c on ce rn s , Y ou r H on or .

    B ut I 'm u rg in g y ou t o c on si de r t hi s c as e i n t he g ra nd

    s ch em e o f t hi ng s. I f y o u a l lo w c o urt s to go b ac k a n d

    o pen u p a ll of t hes e c as es , w he n i t' s c le ar o n t he

    f ac e t ha t t he re w a s n o a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f o bt ai ne d,

    o r t ha t t he a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f w ou ld n o t h av e b ee n

    m at er ia l, t he n y ou 'r e g oi ng t o c re at e c ha os i n t he

    court system.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: S o, a re y ou s ug ge st in g t ha t t h is

    f ra ud h as b ee n t ha t w id es pr ea d t ha t i t - -

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H o no r, I 'm n ot

    a ck no wl ed gi ng t ha t a ny f ra ud o cc ur re d. I t hi nk t ha t

    there is -- we all know --

    J UDG E F ARM ER : W hy w ou ld w e s hr in k - - a s a

    c ou rt s ys te m, w hy w ou ld w e s hr in k, n o m at te r h ow m an y

    c as es i t m ig ht i nv ol ve , f ro m l oo ki ng o u t f or a tt em pt s

    t o d ef ra ud c ou rt s t o p ub li sh a nd u tt er a nd u se f al se

    i ns tr um en ts ? W hy w ou ld n 't w e b e m os t v i g il an t?

    MS . G ID DI NG S: A nd , Y ou r H on or , I t hi nk t ha t if

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    24/37

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    25/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    25

    M S. G ID DI NG S: T he y' ve a lr ea dy b ee n a w a rd ed

    a tt or ne ys f ee s i n t he f ir st c as e, Y ou r H on or .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: O h, t h ey w er e?

    M S. G I DD IN GS : Y es , m a' am .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: A ft er t he v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al ?

    MS . G I DD IN GS : T ha t' s w h y I s ai d wh en t he

    v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al w as t ak en , t he y m ov ed f or

    a tt or ne ys f ee s. T he y a ck no wl ed ge d t he v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al w as w it ho ut p re ju di ce . T he y a sk ed f or a

    m ul ti pl ie r a wa rd b as ed o n t he f ac t t ha t t he y h ad

    f or ce d B an k o f N ew Y or k t o f il e i nv ol un ta ri ly

    d is mi ss al s. T he y t oo k n o a ct io n a sk in g - -

    J UDG E F ARM ER : H ow d id t he y k n ow th ey w er e

    g oi ng t o r ef il e?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: P ar do n?

    J UDG E F ARM ER : H ow d id t he y k no w th at B NY w as

    g oi ng t o r e fi le ? W hy w er en 't t he y e n ti tl ed t o

    a ss um e, b ec au se t he y h ad m ov ed t o d is mi ss , p er io d,

    t hat t ha t w ou ld b e t he e nd o f t he c la im ?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: W el l, Y ou r H o no r, i f t h at w as

    t he c as e, t he y s ho ul d h av e a sk ed t o d is mi ss w it h

    prejudice.

    J UDG E FA RM ER : I s ee .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: I f t he v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al

    d iv es ts t he C ou rt o f j ur is di ct io n, h ow d id t h e C ou rt

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    26/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    26

    of jurisdiction award attorneys fees?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: B ec au se a tt or ne ys f ee s w o u ld

    h av e b ee n c ol la te ra l, Y ou r H on or .

    A nd I 'l l b e h ap py t o a dd re ss t ha t i ss ue t hr ou gh

    s up pl em en ta l b ri ef in g, i f t he C ou rt w ou ld l ik e. B ut

    I t hi nk t ha t t ha t' s p ro ba bl y a n i ss ue t ha t w il l c om e

    up be fo re t he C ou rt - - i t c ou ld c om e u p b ef or e t he

    C ou rt o nc e t h er e' s a f in al j ud gm en t. I t' s m y

    understanding that the entitlement to attorneys fees

    h as b ee n d et er mi ne d, b ut a n e vi de nt ia ry h ea ri ng - -

    J UDG E W ARN ER : I n t h e f ir st c as e?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: I n t h e f i rs t c a se , Y o ur H on or .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: S o, t he re 's s om e c o nt in ui ng

    j ur is di ct io n t o d o t he se t hi ng s i n t he f ir st c as e.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: W el l, Y ou r H o no r, I b el ie ve a

    Court always has continuing jurisdiction to determine

    a tt or ne ys f ee s i n a c as e w he n i t' s c ol la te ra l t o - -

    J UD GE F AR ME R: S o, u si ng t he se j ur is di ct io na l

    n ot io ns , w il l j ea lo us r eg ar d t he r ig ht o f a tt or ne ys

    t o g et f ee s, b ut n ot p ro te ct a ga in st f ra ud o n t he

    Court?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H o no r, t ha t' s n o t w ha t I ' m

    s ay in g. I 'm j us t t el li ng Y ou r H on or s w ha t o cc ur re d

    in th is c as e. T he r e co rd s - -

    J UDG E F ARM ER : M ay be we s ho ul d c le ar u p t he l aw

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    27/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    27

    i n t ha t r eg ar d.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H on or , I w ou ld s ug ge st t ha t

    if yo u' re g oi ng t o h ol d t ha t y ou d on 't h av e t o h av e

    a ff ir ma ti ve r el ie f i n a c as e, t ha t y ou ' re g oi ng t o

    h av e t o c er ti fy c on fl ic t w it h t he s er vi ce e xp er t' s

    c as e t ha t w as i ss ue d f ou r w ee ks a go .

    J UD GE P OL EN : U nl es s i t' s d is ti ng ui sh ab le .

    M S. G ID DI NG S: P ar do n?

    J UD GE P OL EN : U nl es s i t' s d is ti ng ui sh ab le .

    M S. G ID DI NG S: W el l, Y ou r H on or , I w ou ld a ss er t

    t ha t t ha t c as e i s o n a ll f ou rs w it h t hi s c as e.

    J UD GE P OL EN : I s ee a n um be r o f d is ti ng ui sh in g

    f ac to rs , m os t i mp or ta nt o f w hi ch t he a ll eg ed f ra ud

    t ha t o cc ur re d i n t ha t c as e p er ta in ed t o t wo

    a ff id av it s w hi ch w er e f il ed b y t he a pp el le e w hi ch t he

    appellant suggested were fraudulent in furtherance of

    a m ot io n f or s um ma ry j ud gm en t, b ut o nl y b ec au se

    they're contesting the factual allegations and

    a pp ar en t i nc on si st en ci es t ha t m ay h av e e xi st ed i n

    those affidavits.

    N ow , t ha t m ay b e c on si de re d s om e k in d o f f ra ud .

    Bu t i t' s n ot t he k in d o f f ra ud o n t he C ou rt t ha t

    w ou ld b e i f t he a pp el la nt h er e c ou ld p ro ve t he ir

    a ll eg at io ns , w h er e d oc um en ts f il ed i n s up po rt o f a

    mortgage foreclosure proceeding were fraudulently

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    28/37

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    29/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    29

    th e s a me a s w h en yo u g et a j ud gm ent . Th e C ou rt l os es

    j ur is di ct io n o ve r t ha t j ud gm en t a ft er t he t im e f or

    a pp ea l h as r un o r t he t im e f or r eh ea ri ng , b ut t he

    judge still has jurisdiction for collateral issues

    regarding attorneys fees.

    J UD GE W AR NE R: T o e n te r a n y t y pe o f j u dg me nt

    a ls o, y ou w ou ld h av e 1 .5 40 (b ) r el ie f, w hi ch i s w ha t

    they're asking for.

    M S. G I DD IN GS : Y es , m a' am .

    J UD GE F AR ME R: A nd a j ud gm en t i s a j ud gm en t,

    n ot a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al . T he C ou rt i sn 't b ei ng

    i nv ol ve d i n t he j ud gm en t. T he C ou rt h as a ct ua ll y

    e nt er ed a j ud gm en t b as ed o n s om et hi ng t ha t c am e i n

    f ro nt o f t he m.

    MS . GI DD IN GS : Y es , Yo ur H on or . An d I w ou ld

    s ay t ha t g oi ng f or wa rd w it h t he f ra ud a nd o bt ai ni ng a

    j ud gm en t, i f y o u c an no t v ac at e t ha t j ud gm en t u nl es s

    t he f ra ud g oe s t o t he h ea rt o f t he j ud gm en t, t he n y ou

    c ou ld n ot d o s o w it h a v ol un ta ry d is mi ss al w he n t he re

    was no affirmative relief obtained.

    J UD GE W AR NE R: W el l, i f y ou 'r e s ay in g t he y' re

    g et ti ng f ee s b ec au se t he y w er e a p re va il in g p ar ty o r

    something, then --

    J UDG E F ARM ER : T he n t he c as e w a s ov er .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: W el l, n ot o nl y - - b u t, c le ar ly ,

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    30/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    30

    t ha t' s a d ec is io n t ha t h as t o r el at e s om eh ow t o a

    d ec is io n o n m er it s, i .e . , t ha t t he y w ou ld b e

    s uc ce ss fu l i n s ho wi ng t ha t t hi s w as f ra ud , a nd i t w as

    material and everything else.

    M S. G ID DI NG S: N o, n o, Y ou r H o no r, t he y a s ke d

    f or a d is mi ss al b as ed o n - - w ha t t he y w er e a sk in g f or

    wa s a d is mi ss al b as ed o n l ac k o f s ta ndi ng . T he y d id

    n ot a sk f or a d is mi ss al w it h p re ju di ce b as ed o n a

    s an ct io n. T he y s i mp ly s ai d t ha t o ur c li en t h a d n ot

    established --

    J UD GE W AR NE R: I k no w, b ut y ou v ol un ta ri ly

    d is mi ss ed i t. T he n t he y c o me i n a n d a s k f or

    a tt or ne ys f ee s o n w ha t b as is ?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: O n a p re va il in g p ar ty b as is .

    J UD GE W A RN ER : U nd er c o nt ra ct ?

    M S. GI DD IN GS : Y es .

    J UD GE W AR NE R: B ut i f y ou v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss

    i t, a re y ou e nt it le d t o s ee k y ou r c on tr ac tu al f ee s?

    I t ho ug ht t ha t y ou 'r e s tu ck , a re n' t y ou ?

    MS . G ID DI NG S: Y ou r H on or, I c an 't s pe ak t o t he

    v al id it y o f t he o rd er d et er mi ni ng e nt it le me nt a t t hi s

    p oi nt i n t he p ro ce ed in g. T ha t m ig ht b e b ef or e t hi s

    C ou rt - -

    J UD GE W AR NE R: W el l, I 'm j us t s ay in g t h at s he

    s ai d s he d oe sn ' t h av e j ur is di ct io n a nd t he n s he d oe s

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    31/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    31

    h ave j ur is di ct io n. S o, ho w c an i t b e b oth w ay s?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: B ec au se y ou a lw ay s h av e

    jurisdiction over collateral issues.

    J UDG E W ARN ER : B ut i f i t 's a v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al , w ha t c ol la te ra l i ss ue s w ou ld t he re b e?

    M S. G ID DI NG S: A cc or di ng t o t he I ce L eg al f ir m,

    t he i ss ue s a re t ha t t he y w er e t he p re va il in g p ar ty ,

    a nd t ha t' s h ow t he y s ou gh t t he f ee s, b ec au se t he y

    successfully convinced our client to voluntarily

    dismiss the case.

    A nd , Y ou r H on or s, I u nd er st an d y ou r c on ce rn s.

    I d o - -

    J UDG E F A RM ER : L et m e a sk yo u t o su m u p b ec au se

    y ou 'r e w el l o ve r a nd y ou 'v e c on su me d a l ot o f t im e.

    G o a he ad a nd f i ni sh y ou r t ho ug ht .

    M S. G ID DI NG S: Y es , Y o ur H on or .

    I j us t w ou ld l ik e t o r ei te ra te t o t hi s C ou rt

    t ha t t he re a re a ny n um be r o f r ea so ns f or a ff ir mi ng

    t his c as e: T he d el ay i n b ri ng in g t he m ot io n to

    v ac at e t he d is mi ss al ; t h e f ac t t ha t t he s ec on d s ui t

    h as b ee n f il ed , a nd t he C ou rt c an c on si de r t hi ng s i n

    t hat s ui t; a nd I d o n ot b el ie ve t ha t t he f ra ud w as - -

    if an y f ra ud d id o cc ur, wh ic h w e d o n ot k no w at t hi s

    p oi nt w he th er i t d id , t ha t i t' s n ot m at er ia l.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: T ha nk y ou v er y m uc h, C ou ns el .

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    32/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    32

    Mr. Nieves.

    MR . N IE VE S: Y ou r H on or , j us t to be gi n, t o

    a dd re ss t he a tt or ne ys f ee s i ss ue - -

    J UDG E F ARM ER : I 'm g oi ng t o g i ve yo u a t l ea st

    three minutes.

    M R. N IE VE S: O ka y, t ha nk y ou , Y o ur H on or .

    We h av e t o m ov e w it hi n 3 0 da ys o f a v ol un ta ry

    d is mi ss al , b y r ul e. T ha t' s s om et hi ng w e j us t h av e t o

    do .

    J UD GE F AR ME R: 1 .5 25 ?

    MR . N IE VE S: I t h as n ot hi ng t o d o w it h t he

    i ss ue s h er e. A ny d e la y i s to ta ll y i rr el ev an t. A nd

    a s f ar a s a sk in g f or a m ul ti pl ie r, w e c er ta in ly h av e

    d if fe re nt c li en te le t ha n A ke rm an . S o, w e h av e t o

    f in d o th er w ay s t o t ak e s om e o f t he se c as es w he re w e

    ca n't t hr ow as m uc h m on ey i nt o i t a s A ke rm an . A nd I

    g ue ss t ha t' s w ha t I 'l l s ay a bo ut t ha t.

    A nd a s f ar a s s er vi ce e xp er ts , I di d l oo k

    t hr ou gh t he c as e, a nd o ne - - f ir st , i t' s n ot f in al

    s ubj ec t t o r ev is io n. A nd e ve n i f i t i s f in al , w ha t

    i t h el d w as t he c om mo n l aw e xc ep ti on t o s tr ik e

    i nv ol un ta ry d is mi ss al d i d n o t a pp ly . A ny th in g a bo ut

    fr au d w as d ic ta . A nd i f y ou r ea d t he o pin io n, t he y

    s ay r ig ht i n t he b eg in ni ng w ha t t he y' re r ul in g o n.

    T he y' re r ul in g o n t he c om mo n l aw e xc ep ti on .

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    33/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    33

    N ow , w he n t he y d o t al k a bo ut f ra ud , y ou c an

    also distinguish that, and it's distinguishable,

    b ec au se t he a ff id av it s w er e f il ed i n r es po ns e t o a

    57 .10 5 m ot io n. I t d id n ot a pp ly t o a ll t he c la im s.

    In ot he r w or ds , f or t he Co ur t, i t w as j ust n ot a b ig

    p art o f t he c as e. H er e, w e' re t alk in g a bo ut -- i f

    yo u l oo k a t t he T ay lo r c as e f ro m t he F if th D CA, t he

    a ss ig nm en t i s p ar am ou nt . T hi s i s t he ir e vi de nc e.

    A nd t he ir o nl y b it o f e vi de nc e t o p ro ve t he ir c as e,

    they manufactured it.

    A nd a s f ar a s o ur c li en t n ot p ay in g t he - -

    u su al ly w he n t he y a cc el er at e, t he y d on ' t a cc ep t

    p ay me nt s a ny wa y. W e h av en 't b ee n n ot if ie d t ha t t he y

    w er e r ei ns ta ti ng t he l oa n o r a ny th in g l ik e t ha t. A nd

    g en er al ly , w ha t t he y d o i s t he y d on 't a cc ep t

    p ay me nt s. A nd i f t h ey d o a c ce pt t he m, t he y a c ce pt

    t he m o n a t ri al m od if ic at io n, w hi ch t he y u su al ly

    don't grant anyway.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: I f t he y a cc ep t t he p ay me nt , t h ey

    w ai ve t he a cc el er at io n; i s t ha t w ha t y o u' r e s ay in g?

    MR . N IE VE S: W el l, I 'm no t e ve n g e tt in g t o

    t ha t. I 'm j us t s a yi ng t he y d o n' t a c ce pt i t.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: T ha t' s t h ei r a r gu me nt .

    MR . N IE VE S: A nd a s f ar as t hi s a bs ol ut e r ig ht,

    w e' ve b ee n t al ki ng t h e w ho le t im e a bo ut f ra ud

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    34/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    34

    e xc ep ti on . I t' s b ee n r ec og ni ze d. A nd e ve n t he c a se s

    t ha t a re d is ti ng ui sh ed a nd u se d a s a ff ir ma ti ve

    r el ie f, n on e o f t he m d ea lt w it h f ra ud . B ev an d ea lt

    w it h l a ck o f p r os ec ut io n. R om ar w as a c as e w h er e

    t he re w as a d ep os it io n s et , a nd I b el ie ve n ob od y

    s ho we d, a nd t he y w er e g oi ng t o g et t he ir c os t a nd

    f ee s f or t ha t, a nd t he y v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss ed .

    N on e o f t he se c as es d ea lt wi th f ra ud . E ve n t he

    s er vi ce s w hi ch I a lr ea dy s po ke o f w as t he y h ad t o

    c on si de r i t a w ri t o f p ro hi bi ti on . It w as k in d o f a

    d if fe re nt p os tu re . B ut e ve n t ha t b ei ng s ai d, a ny

    a ll eg ed f ra ud t he re d id n 't h av e a ny th in g, r ea ll y, t o

    do wi th t he c la im s. A nd a s f ar a s f in al it y b ei ng a

    f ac to r i n a ny o f t he se c as es , i t' s n ot . Th ey 'r e

    a lw ay s g o in g t o r ef il e. T he o nl y p u rp os e i n

    v ol un ta ri ly d is mi ss in g i s t o u se i t a s a s hi el d t o

    c ov er u p t he f ra ud .

    A nd a s f ar a s b ei ng m or e c as es , t he re w il l b e

    t he o ri gi na l c as e , t h e f ra ud ul en t c as e , t h e r ef il ed

    s ec on d c as e, t h e p ot en ti al c la im s a ga in st t he

    p la in ti ff a s f a r a s a ny bo dy w ho 's b ee n w ro ng ed ,

    f or ec lo su re s, a ny th in g l i k e t h a t. T he se c an k ee p

    c om in g b ac k. I t' s s om et hi ng t ha t w e' re b et te r s er ve d

    b y a ll ow in g o ur j ud ge s t o d ea l w it h i t r ig ht i n t ha t

    c ase . A nd a s f ar as h an dl in g t h e s e co nd ca se , o f

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    35/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    CONSOR & ASSOCIATES REPORTING AND TRANSCRIPTION

    561.682.0905

    35

    c ou rs e w e w ou ld r ai se t he i ss ue i n t he s ec on d c as e.

    Bu t i t h ap pe ne d i n t hi s c as e. A nd t ho se c as es - -

    J UD GE W AR NE R: I f y ou 'r e o bt ai ni ng - - y ou 'r e

    s ay in g t ha t i n t hi s c as e y ou d id r ec ei ve y ou r

    a tt or ne ys f ee s, o r y o u a re r ec ei vi ng a tt or ne ys f ee s

    as pr ev ai li ng p ar ty. B ut y ou w an t t o s tr ik e --

    MR . N IE VE S: I 'l l t el l y ou t he t ru th , I d o n ot

    know. I just know that the rule -- I know that we

    h ave t o m ov e w it hi n 3 0 d ay s. I 'm n ot s ure I d id n' t

    w ork o n a ny of t he a tt or ne ys f ee s m ot io n. S o, I 'm

    n ot p ri vy t o t ha t.

    J UD GE W AR NE R: O ka y.

    J UD GE F AR ME R: W as n' t i t j us t a n o rd er a ll ow in g

    e nt it le me nt a nd s et ti ng a f ee ? Y ou d on 't k no w.

    M R. N IE VE S: I 'm p re tt y s ur e e nt it le me nt w as n' t

    e ven d is pu te d. T he re 's c as e l aw w he re if y ou t ak e a

    voluntary dismissal, you're clearly not the

    prevailing party.

    JUDGE FARMER: Do you want to bring it to a

    close? I'll give you a minute to sum it up.

    MR . N IE VE S: A nd a s f ar as a ny j ur is di ct io n

    a rg um en ts , t he C ou rt r el ie d o n t he B ev an c as e , w hi ch

    is clearly distinguishable.

    T o s um e ve ry th in g u p, i f t hi s C ou rt a ff ir ms t he

    T ri al C ou rt , i t 's b as ic al ly s ay in g t ha t i t 's o ka y t o

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    36/37

  • 8/7/2019 FL 4th DCA Pino v. the Bank of New York Mellon Oral Arguments Transcript

    37/37

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    37

    C E R T I F I C A T E

    I, Lucille Huttle, Registered Professional

    R ep or te r, S ta te o f F lo ri da a t L ar ge , c er ti fy t ha t I w as

    a ut ho ri ze d t o a n d d id s te no gr ap hi ca ll y r ep or t t he

    f or eg oi ng p ro ce ed in gs a nd t ha t t he t ra ns cr ip t i s a t ru e

    a nd c om pl et e r ec or d o f m y s te no gr ap hi c n ot es .

    D at ed t hi s 1 0t h d ay o f N ov em be r, 2 01 0.

    ____________________________

    L UC IL LE H UT TL E, R P R, F PR