Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection
description
Transcript of Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection
![Page 1: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Standards
Certification
Education & Training
Publishing
Conferences & Exhibits
Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection
Edward Naranjo
Emerson Process Management, Rosemount Analytical
![Page 2: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Presenter
• Edward Naranjo– Director of Marketing, Flame and Gas– Ph.D. Chemical Engineering from the University of California,
Santa Barbara; B.S. Chemical Engineering, Caltech– ISA Orange County Section president– ISA Process Measurement and Control Division (PMCD)
Director-elect
![Page 3: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Content
• Introduction• Detection Coverage• Detector Placement• Allocation• Commissioning• Maintenance• Conclusion
3
![Page 4: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection
• UGLD is a detection method used to establish the presence of high pressure leaks– Well suited for open, ventilated
areas– Does not require transport of gas
to the sensor– Provides 360° coverage
![Page 5: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection (Continued)
Because of its principle of operation, UGLD can serve as an additional and complementary means for mitigating the risk of fire and explosions1, 2
1 HSE. 2004. Fire and Explosion Strategy, Issue 1. Hazardous Installations Directorate, Offshore Division. http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/strategy/fgdetect.htm. Downloaded October 22, 2010.
2 HSE. 2007. Acoustic Leak Detection. Hazardous Installations Directorate, HID Semi Permanent Circular SPC/TECH/OSD/05. http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid/spc/spctosd05.htm. Downloaded October 22, 2010.
![Page 6: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Safety in Diversity
• All sensing technologies are vulnerable under certain conditions, resulting in poor detection efficiency– In a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) study,
traditional fixed gas detectors accounted for 62% of all detected gas releases over nine years3, 4
– Remaining 38% of releases were mainly detected by personnel
3 HSE Offshore Technology Report – OTO 1999 079, Offshore Hydrocarbon Release Statistics, January 2000. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/otohtm/1999/oto99079.htm. Downloaded October 18, 2010.
4 HSE Offshore Technology Report – OTO 2000 112, Offshore Hydrocarbon Release Statistics, 2000. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/otohtm/2000/oto00112.htm. Downloaded October 22, 2010.
![Page 7: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Safety in Diversity (Continued)
• Diverse detection methods offer the best safeguard against fire and explosion hazards– Having few common failures increases likelihood
of detection on demand
![Page 8: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Challenges for UGLD Use
• Despite UGLD’s wider acceptance, the allocation, installation, commissioning, and maintenance of ultrasonic gas leak detectors remains poorly understood– No regulatory standards and few corporate codes of practice5,6
– No guidelines on the optimal combination of point IR, open path IR detectors, and ultrasonic gas leak detectors for particular applications7
– Correspondence between a hazard defined by gas concentration and a noise level is a persistent question
5 BP. 2009. GP 30-85. Fire and Gas Detection. 6 Shell. 2002. DEP 32.30.20.11-Gen. Fire, Gas and Smoke Detection Systems. 7 HSE. 2004. Fire and Explosion Strategy, Issue 1. Hazardous Installations Directorate, Offshore Division.
![Page 9: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Standards
Certification
Education & Training
Publishing
Conferences & Exhibits
Measurement Principle
![Page 10: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Gas Leak Detection from Ultrasound
Ultrasonic
Audible
| 0 to 25 kHz | 25 to 100 kHz |
Pressurised Gas Leak Frequency Range
![Page 11: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Leak Rate
• Molecules from escaping gas produce a mixture of audible and ultrasonic noise known as broadband sound– Leak rate (or mass flow rate) is a measure of hazard severity– Directly proportional to the cross sectional area of the orifice and
the pressure inside the vessel8, 9
A
p1 p2
1
1
1max 1
2
RT
MApm
v
p
C
C
8 Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N. 1960. Transport Phenomena. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ch. 15.
9 Whitaker, S. 1986. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co. Ch. 10.
![Page 12: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Minimum Pressure
• High pressure systems must be pressurized to a minimum of 145 psi (10 bar) for UGLDs to detect a leak– At these pressures, the ultrasound generated by a
leak is greater than background ultrasound emissions
Alarm threshold
SP
L (
dB)
time (s)
Ultrasonic background noise
Safety margin
![Page 13: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Minimum Pressure (Continued)
• Minimum pressure that supports generation of ultrasound is approximately 30 psi (2 bar) as given by
– For air ( = 1.4), the critical pressure ratio is 0.53
13
1
1
2
1
2
crit
p
p
53.0
151p 30 psi (2 bar)
Typical levels of ultrasonic background noise prevent use of ultrasonic detectors at such low pressures
![Page 14: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Sound Pressure Level (SPL)
• SPL varies according to the sound source’s power dWs/dt, distance to the leak r, and room constant S:10
10 Raichel, D. R. 2006. The Science and Applications of Acoustics, second edition. New York: Springer.
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
0 5 10 15 20 25
Distance from Source (m)
SP
L (
dB
)SPL vs. distance. Methane: 0.1 kg/s, p = 47 bar (682 psi),
d = 4 mm; (■) ethylene: 0.1 kg/s, p = 37 bar stance for methane and ethylene leaks. () (537 psi), d = 4 mm.
Ambient background SPL ≈ 40 dB.
14
Sr
WSPL s 4
2
1log10
10log10
212
mM
RTWs
10
![Page 15: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Leak Detection Range
• The detection range of an ultrasonic gas leak detector depends on the leak rate and ultrasonic background noise– Leak rate governs the ultrasonic noise level generated by the
leak– In practice, most industrial plants have ultrasonic background
noise levels of approximately 55 dB
15
![Page 16: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Detection Coverage
16
Leak rate = 0.1 kg/s (methane) (ea. 4 mm leak at 46 bar)Coverage is reduced for both lower gas pressure or higher background noise
![Page 17: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Standards
Certification
Education & Training
Publishing
Conferences & Exhibits
Installation, Commissioning, and Maintenance
![Page 18: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Installation
• Detectors are installed at heights of 1 - 2 m above potential leak spots– Avoid shadowing or
blockage by installing detectors where sound paths are unobstructed by large solid structures
1 -
2 m
eter
s
![Page 19: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• Placement of ultrasonic gas leak detectors is a function of three factors:– Location of potential gas leaks– Acceptable level of risk (minimum
leak rate to be detected)– Extraneous sources of ultrasound
• Likely sources of gas plumes:– Valves– Weld joints– Flanges– Gaskets– Vessels– Well bays
Detector Placement
Gas leak detector placed near potential source of leaks.
![Page 20: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Detector Placement (Continued)
• Minimum leak rates define the sensitivity required of ultrasonic gas leak detectors
• A categorization of leak rates by the Health Safety Executive (HSE) provides guidance on what’s an acceptable level of risk11:
20
Category
Either… …Or AndGas Cloud
Volume(m3)
Quantity Released (kg)
Mass Flow Rate (kg/s)
Duration (min)
Minor < 1 kg < 0.1 kg/s < 2 min < 10
Significant
1 - 300 0.1 – 1.0 kg/s 2 – 5 min 10 – 3,000
Major > 300 kg > 1.0 kg/s > 5 min > 3,00011 HSE Report. 2001. OSD Hydrocarbon Release Reduction Campaign, Report on the Hydrocarbon Release Investigation Project ~ 1/4/2000 to 31/3/2001.
![Page 21: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Commissioning
• Commissioning consists of two steps:– Test detection system with test unit– Verify system performance with leak simulation equipment
21
![Page 22: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Leak Simulation
• Leak simulations are performed around the expected perimeter of coverage to verify detection range– Ensure detection is unaffected by blockage and acoustic reflections
22
Detector
Nozzle
![Page 23: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Leak Simulation (Continued)
• Leak simulations are performed with inert gases– Similar molecular weight and specific heat ratios as target gases
No GasMolecular
Weight (g/mol)
Specific Heat Ratio
1 Methane 16.04 1.32 (13)
2 Nitrogen 28.02 1.404 (12)
3 Hydrogen 2.02 1.410 (12)
4 Helium 4.00 1.667 (12)
5 Air 28.97 1.40 (13)
UGLD Response to Inert and Combustible Gas Leaks. () Methane, () Nitrogen, () Hydrogen, () Helium. Leak Rate = 0.01 kg/s.
Measurement Error = 3 dB.
12 Atkins, P. W. 1986. Physical Chemistry, 3rd edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.13 Engineering Toolbox. http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-ratio-d_608.html. Downloaded October 25, 2010.
![Page 24: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Maintenance
• Regular visual checks – Blockages on
windscreen – Visual damage to unit
• Testing by means of portable test tool
![Page 25: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Standards
Certification
Education & Training
Publishing
Conferences & Exhibits
Detector Selection
![Page 26: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Detector Selection
• Ultrasonic gas leak detectors should be sufficiently sensitive to detect gas leaks at pre-defined levels– Alarm threshold values may need to be adjusted if
new sources of ultrasound are introduced close to detectors
• Detectors should be equipped with electronic high pass filters to screen audible spectrum of broadband sound– Filtering background noise interference enhances
immunity to false signals
![Page 27: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Detector Selection (Continued)
• Instruments equipped with fail to safe features enhance operational confidence– Example: Acoustic self check periodically verifies
integrity of electronic circuitry and operation of acoustic sensor
• Detectors should support analog output and two-way digital communication to integrate to emergency shutdown systems (ESDs)
![Page 28: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Conclusions
• Ultrasonic gas leak detectors offer an additional and complementary means of detecting gas leaks– Share few common failure modes with conventional
gas sensors– Improve detection rate
• Guidelines for UGLD allocation are simple– 360 coverage lends itself well for calculating the
number and location of detectors in a room– Detection radius is influenced by ultrasonic
background noise, minimum discharge rate to be detected, and ultrasonic interferences
![Page 29: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Conclusions (Continued)
• Results from several mapping surveys suggests certain process areas have similar levels of background ultrasound– Enable users to estimate detection coverage based
on collected data
• Examples of UGLD allocation in offshore and onshore facilities were presented– Classification of spaces into very low noise, low noise,
and high noise prove useful for deciding on appropriate alarm level and detection coverage
– Further fine tuning is possible by conducting a mapping survey
![Page 30: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Conclusions (Continued)
• Through commissioning users can verify leak detectors respond to leaks at a specified radius– Functional test is a close proxy of a hazard scenario
• A minimum amount of maintenance must be carried out with ultrasonic gas leak detectors– Visual inspection– Testing
![Page 31: Fixed Ultrasonic Gas Leak Detection](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062304/56814641550346895db34b05/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Conclusions (Continued)
• When choosing a detector, users are advised to consider features that improve reliability and integration to ESDs– Fail to safe features and calibrators can ensure
devices are operational at all times– Analog output and two-way digital communication are
increasingly essential for the deployment of safety systems