Five-Year Review Report For The Palmetto Recycling ... · Due date: 02/03/2004. Five-Year Review...

P R O M OT F. P R Ol E C 'I P R O S P K R

Five-Year Review Report

For ThePalmetto Recycling Superfund Site

Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina

June 2004

PREPARED BY:South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

2600 Bull StreetColumbia, SC 29201

PREPARED FOR:Region 4

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Approved by: & < s^h^-frj Date:Winston A. SmithDirectorWaste Management Division

10114965

Table of Contents

List of Acronyms iii

Executive Summary 1

Five-Year Review Summary Form 2

Section 1. Introduction 4

Section 2. Site Chronology 5

Section 3. Background A. Physical Characteristics B. History of Contamination and Response Action

666

Section 4. Remedial Actions A. Remedy Selection B. Remedy Implementation C. Operation and Maintenance

7888

Section 5. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review 9

Section 6. Five-Year Review Process A. Administrative Components B. Community Involvement C. Document Review/Data Review D. Site Inspection E. Interviews

9999910

Section 7. Technical Assessment A. Is the Remedy Functioning as Intended by the Decision Documents B. Are the Exposure Assumptions, Toxicity Data, Cleanup Levels, and Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) used at the Time of the Remedy Selection Still Valid C. Has Any Other Information Come to Light that Could Call into Question the Protectiveness of the Remedy D. Technical Assessment Summary

101010

10

10

Section 8. Issues 10

Section 9. Recommendations and Follow-up Actions 10

Section 10. Protectiveness Statement(s) 11

Section 11. Next Review 11

i

Attachments: A. Site Location Maps B. Groundwater Flow Patterns C. Constituents Found in Soil Before Remediation D. Excavation Verification Survey (Horizontal and Vertical Extent of Excavation) E. Constituents Found in Groundwater Before Remediation F. Constituents Found in Groundwater After Remediation G. Copies of Newspaper Notice - Community Involvement And Interview Documentation Form H. Applicable or Relevant & Appropriate Requirements Review I. List of Documents Reviewed J. Site Inspection Check Form and Photographs

ii

List of Acronyms

ARAR Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement CD Consent Decree CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EW Extraction Well CFR Code of Federal Regulations ESD Explanation of Significant DifferenceMCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal MW Monitoring Well NCP National Contingency Plan NPL National Priorities List O&M Operation and Maintenance OU Operable Unit PRP Potentially Responsible Party RA Remedial Action RAO Remedial Action Objective RD Remedial Design RI/FS Remedial Investigation/Feasibility StudyROD Record of Decision RPM Remedial Project Manager SDWA Safe Drinking Water ActSCDHEC South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control VOC Volatile Organic Compound

iii

Executive Summary

The Palmetto Recycling Site is located about 8 miles north of Columbia, South Carolina, in rural Richland County.The site is positioned between U.S. Routes 321 and 21 on the north side of Koon Store Road (State RoadS-40-61). The Site occupies approximately 1.5 acres.

Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchased the property in 1979 for the purpose of operating a battery recycling company.From 1979 to 1983, the facility was involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries. A below-grade fiberglasscollection sump received wastewater contaminated with sulfuric acid from various plant operations. A studyconducted by SCDHEC identified elevated concentrations of lead and iron in the groundwater samples collectednext to the sump. The investigation also revealed the presence of elevated concentrations of lead in on-site soils.

On March 30, 1995, EPA issued a Record of Decision that selected a remedy of excavation of contaminatedsurface soil (one foot) that exceeded the remediation goal of 400 ppm for lead. The excavated area was backfilledwith clean soil. The Record of Decision also required groundwater monitoring to confirm that the remedy waseffective at protecting human health and the environment.

The cleanup levels established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. In addition, current groundwatermonitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts perbillion (ppb). The Site was deleted from the NPL on October 13,2000.

1

Five-Year Review Summary Form

SITE IDENTIFICATION

Site name: Palmetto Recycling

EPAID:SCD037398120

Region: 4 State: SC City/County: Columbia / Richland County

SITE STATUS

NPL Status: D Final X Deleted D Other (specify)

Remediation Status (choose all that apply): D Under Construction D Operating X Complete

Multiple OUs? D YES X NO Construction completion date: 02 / 03 / 1999

Has site been put into reuse? D YES X NO

REVIEW STATUS

Lead agency: x EPA State D Tribe U Other Federal Agency

Author name: Yvonne Jones

Author title: Remedial Project Manager Author affiliation: U.S. EPA, Region 4

Review period: 02 / 18/2004 to 047 19/2004

Date(s) of site inspection: 04 /14 / 2004

Type of review:LJ Post-SARA Q Pre-SARAD Non-NPL Remedial Action SiteX Regional Discretion_______

L'NPL-Rcmoval only[iNPLState/Tribc-LeadD Statutory Review

Review number: x 1 (first) 2 (second) D 3 (third) Hi Other (specify)

Triggering action:D Actual RA On-site Construction at OU #X Construction CompletionD Other (specify)

D Actual RA Start at OU#D Previous Five-Year Review Report

Triggering action date: 02 / 03 / 1999

Due date: 02/03/2004

Five-Year Review Summary Form, cont'd.

Issues:

No issues have come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

Recommendations and Follow-up Actions: No further action at this Site is recommended at this time.

Protectiveness Statement(s):

All immediate threats at the Site have been addressed, and the remedy is protective of human health and theenvironment.

Long-term Protectiveness:

The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. The long-term protectiveness of theremedial action was verified by continued monitoring of groundwater to confirm that the remedy was effective atprotecting human health and the environment. Current groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwaterconcentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb).

3

Section 1. Introduction

The purpose of the five-year review is to determine whether the remedy at a site is protective of human health andthe environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews are documented in Five-Year Review reports.In addition, Five-Year Review reports identify issues found during the review, if any, and identify recommendationsto further evaluate and address them as necessary.

The Agency is preparing this Five-Year Review report pursuant to CERCLA § 121 and the National ContingencyPlan (NCP). CERCLA § 121 states:

If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous substances, pollutants, orcontaminants remaining at the site, the President shall review such remedial action no less oftenthan each five years after the initiation of such remedial action to assure that human health and theenvironment are being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon suchreview it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such site in accordance withsection [104] or [106], the President shall take or require such action. The President shall report tothe Congress a list of facilities for which such review is required, the results of all such reviews, and any actions taken as a result of such reviews.

The Agency interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 CFR § 300.430(f)(4)(ii) states:

If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminantsremaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, the leadagency shall review such action no less often than every five years after the initiation of the selectedremedial action.

The EPA-Region 4 in conjunction with SCDHEC conducted the five-year review of the remedy implemented at thePalmetto Recycling Superfund Site in Columbia, South Carolina. This review was conducted for the Site fromFebruary 2004 through April 2004. This report documents the results of the review.

This is the first five-year review for the Palmetto Recycling Site. As required by the ROD and at the request ofSCDHEC, a five-year review is being conducted to assess the continued effectiveness of the remedial action and tosummarize the data obtained from groundwater monitoring.

4

Section 2. Site Chronology

Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events

Event Date

Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchases the property for the purpose of operating abattery recycling company

1979

Palmetto Recycling involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries 1979 to 1983

SCDHEC denies applications by Palmetto Recycling, Inc. to operate a hazardouswaste facility and to transport hazardous wastes

1981

Palmetto Recycling files for bankruptcy 02/11/1983

10,800 gallons of contaminated water is collected by Bryson Industries Services and taken to Alternate Energy Resources

04/25/1984

100 drums containing liquid caustic waste are removed from the Site 1984

A total of 365 tons of soils removed from various areas on-site and placed in off-sitelandfills

1985 and 1986

EPA conducts a Preliminary Assessment 1987

The Palmetto Recycling Site added to the NPL 07/1987

EPA conducts Remedial Investigation field activities at the Site 04/1993 to 06/1993; 03/1994 to 07/1994

EPA issues a Record of Decision 03/30/1995

Consent Decree is signed between the United States and Lucent Technologies, Inc. 05/1997

Remedial Design for the specific remedial actions is approved 04/1998

Several components of the Remedial Design are implemented 11/1998- 01/1999

Approximately 947 cubic yards of soil is excavated down to one-foot and removed from the Site and backfilled with clean material

01/12/1999- 02/03/1999

Remedial Action Final inspection 02/17/1999

Final Close-Out Report issued 07/21/1999

The Site is deleted from the NPL 10/13/2000

5

Section 3. Background

The Palmetto Recycling Site is located about 8 miles north of Columbia, South Carolina, in rural Richland County.The site is positioned between U.S. Routes 321 and 21 on the north side of Koon Store Road (State RoadS-40-61). It occupies approximately 1.5 acres and is bounded by Koon Store Road to the south, an unnamed dirtroad (and farther removed, Dry Fork Creek) to the east, an unnamed tributary of Dry Fork Creek to the north, anda residence to the west (EPA, 1995).

A. Physical Characteristics

The Site is situated in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and the Carolina Slate Belt Geologic Province of SouthCarolina. The Carolina Slate Belt is part of an extensive group of metamorphosed, volcanic, and sedimentary rocksoccurring along the southeast edge of the Piedmont Province from Georgia to Virginia. In the vicinity of the site,these rocks consist of meta-argillite, phyllite, volcanic tuff and volcanic flows of the Asbill Pond Formation. Most of these rocks are mantled by residual soil that is developed through in-situ weathering of fractured or jointedmetamorphic rocks.

Lithologic evaluation of split-spoon and core samples (limited to the upper 84 feet of materials) was conducted withfield descriptions and geotechnical tests. Lithologic evaluation of split-spoon samples showed soils and saprolitewere composed of varying combinations of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. The dominant lithologies were clay and silt,the primary constituents of argillite. Sands were typically fine-grained. Soil colors included red, yellow, gray, brown,and green.

The initial assessment of hydrogeological conditions at the Site was conducted by SCDHEC. Groundwater datacollected during this assessment consisted of water table measurements collected from five monitoring wells. Resultsof the measurements indicated the depth to groundwater was 5 to 11 feet below ground surface. Water tablecontours indicate the direction of groundwater is southeast toward Dry Fork Creek (EPA, 1995).

B. History of Contamination and Response Action

Palmetto Recycling, Inc. purchased the property on Koon Store Road in 1979 for the purpose of operating abattery recycling company. From 1979 to 1983, the facility was involved in the reclamation of lead from batteries.It is unknown what activities occurred onsite prior to 1979. A collection sump received wastewater contaminatedwith sulfuric acid from various plant operations. The sump was a below-grade fiberglass tank in an unlined pit.Specific neutralization process details are unknown, but at some point, Palmetto Recycling started dischargingwastewater of unknown composition to the local sewer system. In addition, a former employee reported that duringoperations, liquid wastes were dumped north of the site, outside the fenced area.

After discharging wastewater for an unknown period of time, Palmetto Recycling attempted to obtain a dischargepermit. In 1981, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) deniedapplications by Palmetto Recycling, inc. to operate a hazardous waste facility and to transport hazardous wastes.After this attempt, some waste liquids were sent offsite to an acid recycler and some were disposed of onsite. It isnot known if these wastes were neutralized before shipment or onsite disposal. The quantities are also unknown.Plastic battery cases and lead plates were eventually sold to other companies as reusable materials. A studyconducted by SCDHEC identified elevated concentrations of lead and iron in the groundwater samples collectednext to the sump. High levels of lead, barium, and chromium were found in sediment from the unnamed stream that

6

runs north of the Site. The investigation also revealed the presence of elevated concentrations of lead in on-sitesoils. SCDHEC noted the presence of a five-foot deep, unlined acid pit containing 1,800 gallons of acid waste atthe Site, as well as 100 drums of caustic waste and an unstable pile of battery casings.

On February 11, 1983, Palmetto Recycling filed for bankruptcy and Ryan Hovis was appointed trustee. In 1984,workers removing equipment from the Site destroyed a section of the roof that covered the on-site wastewatercollection sump. The wastewater consisted of lead oxide and sulfuric acid from the wash process. As a result of thisincident, sump water percolated through soils adjacent to the pit area. To address immediate health andenvironmental risks posed by the Site, three removal actions have occurred at the Site. On April 25, 1984, 10,800gallons of contaminated water were collected by Bryson Industries Services and taken to Alternate EnergyResources. Later in 1984, approximately 100 drums containing liquid caustic waste were removed from the Site.On October 2, 1985, SCDHEC authorized Future Fuel Development, Inc., to remove site soils contaminated withlead and chromium. A total of 365 tons of soils were removed from various areas on-site and placed in off-sitelandfills during 1985 and 1986.

In 1986, EPA conducted a Preliminary Assessment of the Site. EPA proposed the Site for inclusion on theNational Priorities List (NPL) in January 1987. The Palmetto Recycling Site was formally added to the NPL in July1987.

In 1992, EPA negotiated with parties it had identified as Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) for the Site toconduct a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS). An agreement was not reached between EPA and theparties. Therefore, EPA conducted RI Field activities at the Site from April 1993 through June 1993 and fromMarch 1994 through July 1994 (EPA, 1995).

In May 1997, a Consent Decree was signed between the United States and one PRP. EPA and the South CarolinaDepartment of Health and Environmental Control approved a Remedial Design for the specific remedial actions inApril 1998. From November 1998 through January 1999, several components of the Remedial Action wereimplemented, which included verification sampling and analysis, monitoring well abandonment, a structuralinspection, an asbestos survey analysis, approval of backfill material and permitting activities. The verificationsample test results, together with previous RI and Remedial Design (on-site and residential) test results, were usedto further refine excavation boundaries and confirm that residential properties were not contaminated. Sampleresults showed that lead levels in the adjacent residential yard were below 400 ppm. Based on this data, revised(reduced) excavation boundaries were approved by EPA and SCDHEC on December 24, 1998. BetweenJanuary 11, 1999 and February 3, 1999, a total of 363 drums of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) wereappropriately segregated, characterized and removed off-site to a RCRA qualifying facility. In addition,approximately 6,500 gallons of liquid IDW were removed off-site to a qualifying publicly owned treatment works(Direct, 2000).

EPA and SCDHEC found that the remedy significantly reduced the release of contaminants to the environment andcontinues to provide adequate protection to human health. Consequently, the Site was deleted from the NPLOctober 13, 2000.

Section 4. Remedial Actions

As a result of the Baseline Risk Assessment, EPA determined that remediation of surface soil would be required forthe protection of human health and the environment. The remediation level of 400 ppm for lead is designed to

7

protect children from developing lead blood levels above 10 µg/dl. The Baseline Risk Assessment concluded thatthe subsurface soils, the surface water, and the sediments at the Site were not media of concern.

A. Remedy Selection

On March 30, 1995, EPA issued a Record of Decision that selected the following remedy:

SURFACE SOIL - SOURCE CONTROL • Excavate contaminated surface soil that exceeds the remediation level of 400 ppm for lead and

verification sampling; • Backfill the excavated area with clean soil and establish a vegetative cover to minimize undue

surface water runoff and minimize erosion; • Transport soil exceeding the Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) of 5 ppm for lead using the Toxicity

Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test to a RCRA Subtitle C Facility. Transport soil notexceeding the 5 ppm LDR to a Subtitle D solid waste landfill.

SITE MONITORING • Monitor groundwater on an annual basis for at least five years to evaluate the Site progress.

ADDITIONAL SAMPLING • Collect additional confirmation samples from the adjacent residential yards and from the dirt road

that borders the Site to the east to confirm the absence of soil contamination. (EPA, 1995).

B. Remedy Implementation

Soil excavation activities began on January 12, 1999. Approximately 947 cubic yards of soil were excavated downto one-foot and removed from the Site. After excavation was completed in each area, a post-excavation surveywas performed to verify removal of the top one-foot of soil. Excavated soil and sediment were transported to anddisposed at a qualifying Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility. Backfilling the Site with cleansoil provided further assurance that the Site no longer poses any threats to human health or the environment.Construction activities concluded on February 3, 1999.

Although contaminants were no longer impacting the groundwater at the Site, the Record of Decision requiredgroundwater monitoring to confirm that the remedy was effective at protecting human health and the environment(Direct, 2000).

C. Operation and Maintenance

The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. In addition, groundwatermonitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 parts perbillion (ppb). The concentration levels detected during groundwater monitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb(Direct, 2000). Operation and maintenance cost information is not currently available.

8

Section 5. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review

This is the first Five Year Review for this Site.

Section 6. Five-Year Review Process

A. Administrative Components

SCDHEC initiated the five-year review in February 2004. The components of this Five-Year review consist ofcommunity involvement, data/document review, site inspection, and interviews, as summarized below.

B. Community Involvement

Activities involving the community in the Five-Year review were initiated with a notice that was sent to the localnewspaper stating that a Five-Year review was to be conducted. This notice was posted in The State Newspaperon April 11, 2004. A copy of the public notice is provided in Attachment G of this report.

Within thirty (30) calendar days of the report finalization, a notice will be published in The State Newspaperannouncing that the Five-Year Review report for the Palmetto Recycling Superfund site is complete, and that theresults of the review and the report are available to the public at the Northeast Regional Library (7490 ParklaneRoad, Columbia, SC 29223; Ph: 803-736-6575). This report will also be placed in the Administrative file at boththe EPA Region 4 and SCDHEC offices.

C. Document Review/Data Review

This Five-Year review consisted of a review of relevant documents including O&M records and monitoring data(See Attachment J).

The cleanup levels established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. Approximately 947 cubic yards ofsoil were excavated down to one-foot and removed from the Site. Confirmation was conducted verify the removalof the top one-foot of soil. Excavated soil and sediment were transported to and disposed at a qualifying ResourceConservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facility. Backfilling the Site with clean fill provided further assurance thatthe Site no longer poses any threats to human health or the environment. Construction activities concluded onFebruary 3, 1999. fn addition, groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead arebelow the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb). The concentration levels detected during groundwatermonitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb.

D. Site Inspection

Inspection at the Site was conducted on April 14, 2004. The purpose of the inspection was to assess theprotectiveness of the remedy, including the protectiveness of the wells. Representatives from SCDHEC Bureau ofLand and Waste Management participated in this site inspection. The site inspection included walking the Site andinspecting groundwater monitoring wells. No significant protectiveness issues were identified.

The Site inspection check form and site photographs are provided in the Attachment J.

9

E. Interviews

Interviews were conducted with various parties connected to the site. Yvonne Jones (RPM, EPA Region 4) wasinterviewed on April 12, 2004. An interview with the SCDHEC project Manager, Mihir Mehta, was alsoconducted during the site inspection on April 14, 2004. Monitoring well placement, current uses of the propertiessurrounding the Site, and potential future use of the Palmetto Recycling Site were discussed with the SCDHECproject manager during the site inspection. These interviews also discussed the information presented in thedocument review section of this report. Information presented in the Site Inspection Check List also resulted from the interviews conducted. The interview documentation form is in Attachment G.

Section 7. Technical Assessment

A. Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?

The review of documents, ARARs, and the results of the site inspection indicate that the remedy is functioning asintended by the ROD.

B. Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial actionobjectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid?

The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time ofthe remedy selection are still valid.

C. Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question theprotectiveness of the remedy?

No other information has come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

Technical Assessment Summary:

According to the data reviewed, the site inspection, and the interviews, the remedy is functioning as intended by theROD. There have been no changes in the physical conditions of the Site that would affect the protectiveness of theremedy. There have been no changes to the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, or remedial actionobjectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection. There is no other information that calls into questionthe protectiveness of the remedy.

Section 8. Issues

No issues have come to light that calls into question the protectiveness of the remedy.

Section 9. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions

No further action at this Site is recommended at this time.

10

Section 10. Protectiveness Statement

The remedy is protective of human health and the environment under current conditions. Monitoring data indicatethat the remedy is functioning as required to achieve protectiveness of human health and the environment.

Section 11. Next Review

The cleanup levels established in the ROD for soil have been met. In addition, current groundwater monitoringindicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based level of 15 ppb. Theconcentration levels detected during groundwater monitoring range from non-detect to 3.2 ppb. As required by theROD and at the request of SCDHEC, a five-year review was conducted to assess the continued effectiveness ofthe remedial action and to summarize the data obtained from groundwater monitoring. Another five-year review forthe Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site is not required.

11

ATTACHMENT A

Site Location Maps

G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemap.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am

COLUMBIARICHLAND COUNTY

PALMETTORECYCLING

SOURCE: RlAS REPORT, COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994

REMEDIAL ACTIONPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

RICHLAND COUNTY,SOUTH CAROLINA

LAWCNQNURINC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

SITE LOCATION MAP

JOB NO. 41-2603-02 FIGURE 1

-EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSTEEL (RAUE SUPERSTRUCTURE

LEGEND___ FFNCC

—— ...—— iNTtRUITICNT DRAINAGE

• ULlf MONilOHWG WELL« INlfRUCDUlF UQNIIOHINC WILL• 'jHAUOW UQNIIORINC WtU

» A8AMOONCD MONUORtNC WCLl

SCAIE IN f f f l

K>« - Ri iNVtSltCAnvt OCRiVCO WASH.SOUBO. Of BASt UAP: BIAS BEPOfll COu rfOCRAL PROCRAUS CORP. NOvCMBCR 1994

REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITElCHl AND COIJN1 Y. *>C

SITE IAYOUT ANDWELL LOCATION MAP

41-2603-02rrr-n—rrrrs-r. ;—iCURt 2

ATTACHMENT B

Groundwater Flow Patterns

LEGEND

——- 1REELINE* SHALLOW MONITOR WLU

a SEDIMENT SAMPLE

240-CONTOUR OF EQUALWATER ELEVATION (fl. 6/2/93)

(2-10.31) WATER ELEVATION (msi.n)DIRECTION OF GROUNOWMERFLOW

5G-06

M W - 4 S

(237.25)

SCALE IN TEET

COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.

Lr-1

COM FPC ARCS IV

POTENTIOMETRIC S'URFACE MAP OF SHALLOW WATER B E A R I N G ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No.

CDc.

LEGEND

— «--- FENCE——— TRCfLINE

INIERMEDIATE MON-.IOR WELL

CONfCilR Of" fOUALWAlL'R [ lEVA i iON (!l. 6/:/9

(24? 32) WATER TABLE ElP/AHON (msl.il)

"""— -— «^. DIRECTION OF CROUNDWATERFLOW

0 C>G 100

SCALE IN FEET

G

COM FPC ARCS IV

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF INTERMEDIATE WATER BEARING ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No. 2

c

COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKec Inc.

LEGEND

—<—— FENCE———- IRECL"jE

• DEEP MONITOR WELL

CONTOUR OF EQUAL240———— WAIER ELEVATION ( f t . 6/2/93)

(246 90) WATER IABLE ELEVATION (msl.C.)

~~~—-~ DIRECTION OF CROUNDWA1ERFLOW

SCALE IN FECT

UH-4D(236.47)

COM FPC ARCS IV

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF DEEP WATER BEARING ZONEPALMETTO RECYCLING

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA FIGURE No. 3

Oc(J"loo

COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATIONa subsidiary of Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.

ATTACHMENT C

Constituents Found in Soil Before Remediation

Palmetto Recvcling Site - Remedial Design Work PlanLAW Project 41-2603-02

June 2.5. 199'

Table 1: Previous Surface Soil Sample Results for Lead'

Sample Location

SS-01SS-02SS-03SS-04SS-05SS-06SS-07SS-08

DlD2D3D4D5D6D7D8

PR-01PR-02PR-03PR-04PR-05

PR-06(2)

PR-07(2)

PR-08

Lead Concentration(ppm)

15.1160140

1,5005802937

410630

6,40065591601903801106706.9J22J6.3J160J14J

300J120J

Notes:(1) Results from Table 3-5 of the RJ/FS, November 16, 1994.(2) For duplicate and split samples, this table reports the highest

value detected at each location.J - Denotes estimated value.

Prepared by/Date: CMH 12/2/96Checked by/Date: AMM 12/4/96

Palmetto Recycling SiteFinal Construction/Remedial Action ReportLAW Project 41-2603-02

May 6, 1999(Revised July 13. 1999)

Table I: Total Lead Analytical Results for Surface Soil SamplesRemedial Action - Verification Samples

SampleIdentification

RAS-101RAS-102RAS-103RAS-104RAS-105RAS-106RAS-107RAS-108RAS-109RAS-110RAS-111RAS-112RAS-113RAS-114RAS-115RAS-116RAS-117RAS-118RAS-119RAS-120RAS-121*RAS-122*RAS-123RAS-201RAS-202

SampleDate

1 7-Nov-98!7-Nov-9818-Nov-9817-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-981 7-Nov-9817-Nov-98!7-Nov-9818-Nov-98l8-Nov-9817-Nov-9817-Nov-981 7-Nov-9817-Nov-9818-Nov-98l7-Nov-9818-Nov-981 7-Nov-981 7-Nov-981 8-Nov-985-Jan-995-Jan-99

Detection Limit(ppm)

1.651.691.421.691.561.691.641.598.261.591.541.501.591.721.751.641.748.401.591.681.611.711.671.721.69

Lead Concentration(ppm)

116128

82.258.072.217.770.1152916240301542433633108

54.8185

1320131

38.914.71 1 1232264222

Note:Lead analyzed by SW-846, Method 6010.Total lead results for all three equipment blanks were non-detect.ppm - parts per million

*RAS-122 is a field duplicate of RAS-104 (Table 2) andRAS-123 is a field duplicate of RAS-108 (Table 2).

Page 1 ofPrepared By: ACW12/14/98

Checked By: CED 4/22/99

Palmetto Recycling SiteFinal Construction/Remedial Action ReportLAW Project 41-2603-02

Mav6. 1999

Table 2: Field Duplicate Results for Surface Soil SamplesRemedial Action - Verification Samples

SampleIdentification

RAS-104RAS-108

SampleDate

17-Nov-9818-Nov-98

DetectionLimit(ppm)

1.691.59

LeadConcentration

(ppm)58152

FieldDuplicate

IdentificationRAS-122RAS-123

DetectionLimit(ppm)

1.711.67

LeadConcentration

(ppm)1 1 1232

Note:Lead analyzed by SW-846, Method 6010ppm - parts per million

Page 1 of:Prepared Uy: ACW 12/14/98

Checked Bv: CEO 4/22/99

EXISTING CONCRETEPAD WITH STEELFRAME SUPERSTRUCTURE

NO SAM*U3 Wtt OUICm VO.OW lit CCMCKTZ FOUNDATION win SAJ*>UNC AT T« COSING CTNO»CTt nxjNOATXW* Ml»ira «M CCUCCTED racw 3CCIMNT AKnc IX FOMOATKM »rtM 1MVUKC AT nc onmc OMCIVTT rauNDATKUKZ CF « 3ATA: «/n KPOHT COM FtKRAL P*nGKAUS C«f>^ NOVCWBDt lt>4

LEGEND

in oocBnooi oi mo

SCALE IN FEET

PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

RICHLAND COC'.MTY. SCSURFACE SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS

AND LEAD ANALYTICAL RESULTS 41-2603-02

ATTACHMENT D

Excavation Verification Survey (Horizontal and Vertical Extent of Excavation)

U.S. EPA Region IV

SDMSUnscannable Material Target Sheet

DocID: IQMMA6 Site ID:

Site Name:

Nature of Material;

Map:

Photos:

Blueprints:

Slides:

Other (describe):

Amount of material:

Computer Disks:

CD-ROM:

Oversized Report:

Log Book:

*Please contact the appropriate Records Center to view the material.*

ATTACHMENT E

Constituents Found in Groundwater Before Remediation

Results from Table 5-3 of the RI/FS, November 16,1994

Table 1STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER

PALMETTO RECYCLING SITECOLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

Constituent.

Inorganics

ArsenicBariumCobalt

ChromiumCopper

MolybdenumNickelLead

StrontiumTitaniumVanadium

YttriumZinc

MercuryAluminumManganese

CalciumMagnesium

IronSodium

Potassium

Volatile Organics

ChloroformCarbon disulfide

Methyl ethyl ketone

Semi-volatile organics

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

•: ••:",. •• •. •: ;• BACICGRpUND SAMPLES I;

Background; . Concentration ••i'-;'5v-::"Raihge':- • ' ;: ;. :; WL)

ND(2 - 15)11-50

ND(8) - 22ND(2) - 9.8ND(3) - 18ND(2) - 3.5

ND(30) - 5,300ND( l ) -9 .3

4 7 - 7 8ND(2) - 68ND(2) - 14ND(2) - 5.8

9.1 - 120ND(0.10-0.2)

ND(50) - 13,000530- 1,800

3,200 - 6,8002,800 - 4,8006,000 - 28,0006,700 - 16,000ND(400) - 630

ND(10)ND(10) - 3

ND(10)

ND(10) - 36

:: :;:.L Average ;•:* •-"'• •: Background •Concentration

>^(Mg/Lr:-.'';;.

0329

5.2101.88984.458306.43.0570

4,285852

4,9503,86711,36712,2832,282

04.33

0

15.33

;•••.•'.;. Baseline .Concentration'^;^^^

0641810203.6

1,7968.81166013

6.01140

8,5701,7049,9007,734

22,73424,5664,564

08.66

0

30.66

NQNÂCKGRQIJIÎSAI^LES :

i^tebiic^htratibi^.:;-^•^'••^•R^nge::;'-:^';-'.:".

W:&«^&

ND(2) - 3814-82

ND(4) - 25ND(2) - 25ND(2) - 29ND(2) -3 .1ND(20) - 79ND(1)- 19

17 -71ND(2) - 10ND(2) - 3

ND(2)ND(20) - 180

ND(0.10)-0.26ND(90) - 20,000

290- 1,600750 - 20,000

1,400 - 12,0004,600 - 44,0003,200 - 42,000

ND(400) - 4,300

ND(10) - 6ND(10) - 7ND(10) - 9

ND(10)

•D'f-Vivyâuy.fi'^f'.illîmiiftji

211362

1 (out of 3)85

3 (out of 3)1 (out of 3)

10 (out of 3)

101811111111113

1 (out of 9)1 (out of 9)1 (out of 9)

0 (out of 9)

Baseline concentration = background concentration multiplied by a factor of 2.ND() = Not detected. The number in parenthesis is the sample quantitation limit.


Table 2

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SUMMARYPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

V< VT1LE ORGAN1CSCh >formCai oon disulfideMi "1 ethyl ketoncSE -VOLATILE ORGANICSBis ethylhexyl)phthalateMETALSArsenicBariumCobaltChromiumCopperMolybdenumNickelLeadStrontiumTitaniumVanadiumYttriumZincMercuryAluminumManganeseCalciumMagnesiumIronSodiumPotassium

MW-01SRound 1

10U10U10U

10U

2U268U820UNA30U7NANA20UNA77o.iou4100530370028001200067002800U

MW-OISRound 2

NANANA

NA

15U468.14.6142.0U126.878209.65.8510.2U1300055032003400940016000560

MW-OHRound 1

10U3J10U

36

2U1120U630UNA53003UNANA4UNA26O.IOU44095044003700670011000I800U

MW-OHRound 2

NANANA

NA

15U50229.8183.5409.34768142.31200.2U87001800530048002800012000630

MW-OIDRound 1

10U10U10U

10U

4U2910U3U3UNA30U2UNANA4UNA590.1 OUsou6606800440060001400020000U

MW-OIDRound 2

NANANA

NA

15U304.92.0U2.42.0U8.4IU502.0U2.0U20U9.10.2U4262063004100610014000400U

MW-02SRound 1

NANANA

NA

NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA

MW-02SRound 1 (DUP)

10U10U10U

IOU

6U3230U3U20UNA30U5UNANA3UNA67O.IOU16005607501400670058002400U

MW-02IRound 1

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

387540U1730UNA7915NANA30UNA180O.IOU84001600920065004400032004300U

MW-02IRound 2

NANANA

NA

15U14146.04.63.1303.517103.02.0U280.2U18009703900430079003200400U

MW-02DRound i :; .

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

5U3120U3U3UNA273UNANA3UNA20UO.IOU360U6002000038007200100003200U

Concentrations presented in ug/1

NA lot analyzedJ .stimated value

U Material was anlayzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.U.' Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is estimated for the minimum quantitation limit.

MW - Monitor wellS -ShallowI - IntermediateD-Deep

CD

CD


Table 2(continued)

GROUNDWATER SAMPLING SUMMARYPALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA

VOLATILE ORGANICSChloroformCarbon disulOdcMethyl ethyl kctoneSEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICSBis(2-ethylhexyl)phlhalateMETALSArsenicBariumCobaltChromiumCopperMolybdenumNickel_xadStrontiumTitaniumVanadiumYttriumZincMercuryAluminumManganeseCalciumMagnesiumron

Sodium'otassium

.::.-, MW-03SRound 1

IOU10UIOU

IOU

196050U2529NA6911NANA30UNA160O.IOU20000110040001200042000120004300

MW-03IRound I

6J7JIOU

IOU

7U4840U4AllNA6219NANA3UNA86O.IOU6500160011000740018000420004700U

MW-03IRound 2

NANANA

NA

15U20252.0U2.0U2.0U26l.OU692.0U20U2.0U370.2U1701300540052001000013000740

MWrOSI

Round2(DUP)

NANANA

NA

15U21242.0U2.0U2.0U26l.OU712.0U2.0U2.0U390.2U1501300550053001000014000490

MW-03DRound )

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

4U52IOU3U3UNA40U3UNANA3UNA27O.IOU130U6201200083007100120002700U

MW-03D - • . . . :Round I (UUP)

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

4U5320U3U3UNA30U2UNANA3UNA25O.IOUI IOU6201200083007100120003000U

MW-04S ..'.;Round 1

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

2U7020U820UNA565NANA20UNA45O.IOU5100290260040001600087002700U

:: MW-04I •Round I.

IOUIOUIOU

IOU

5U4220U33UNA462UNANA3UNA300.26500760550046001200083002400U

: MW-04D' : ' . : ' Round 1

IOUIOU9J

IOU

4U824U3U2.7UNA20U2UNANA3UNA24O.IOU90U4301300081004600110002700U

Concentrations presented in ug/l

NA - Not analyzedJ - Estimated value

U - Material was anlayzed for but not detected. The number is the minimum quanlitation limit.UJ - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is estimated for the minimum quanlitation limit.

MW - Monitor wellS -ShallowI - Intermediate

D-Dcep

CM

o

CD

toO

ATTACHMENT F

Constituents Found in Groundwater After Remediation

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION 4, SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION

ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2720

4SES-EI JAN 1 8 2000

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Palmetto Recycling Site DataColumbia, South CarolinaSESD Project Number: 00-0013

At FROM: Tim Simpson, Environmental ScientistHazardous Waste Section

THRU: Archie Lee, ChiefHazardous Waste Section

TO. Yvonne Jones, RPMNorth Site Management BranchWaste Management Division

Attached are the analytical results for the groundwater samples collected on November

11, 1999 at the Palmetto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. The results indicated that

that mercury (1 .9J ug/1) was detected in one sample (PR04SMW). If you have any questions,

please call me at (706) 355-8736.

Attachment

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion 4

Science and Ecosystem Support Division980 College Station Road

Athens, Georgia 30605-2720

MEMORANDUM

Date: 01711/2000

Subject: Results of METALS Inorganic Chemistry Section Sample Analysis00-0013 Palmetto Recycling

SC

From: Gulhrie, Diane

To: Simpson, Tim

CC: WMD/NSMB

•QA Office

Mtached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.

ATTACHMENT

December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT

Case Number: 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto

Sample No.558

559

560

5 ^^ A^ ^

562

5G3

5C-1

A

: 00-0013Recyclinq,

ElementSbCrMnHgK

AlSbMnHgK

SbCu

MnHgK

SbHgKTl

SbFeHgK

SbAs

CrCu

MnHgK

SbAs

CrMnHgKAg

Columbia

FlaqJUJJJ

UJJRJ

JU

JRJ

JRJU

JURUJ

JU

UU

JRJ

JU

UJRJU

, scReason

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Baseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limit ^•i" V;j' '"*Serial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Matrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but: < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Positives in cal blanksBlind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =52.1%Positives in cal blanks

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLBaseline instability in cal blanks% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLBaseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks

December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)

Case Number; 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto

Sample No.565

566

567

•568

569

>70

A

.- 00-0013Recyclina,

ElementSbAs

BaMnHgK

SbAs

MnHgK

SbAs

MnHgK

SbAs

MnHgK

AlSbAs

Cd

Cu

MnHgK

SbBaCrMnHgKV

Columbia

FlapJU

UJRJ

JU

JRJ

JU

JRJ

JU

JRJ

UJU

U

U

JRJ

JUUJ .RJU

, sc

ReasonMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73,3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52:1%

Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%% RSD > 20%, for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDL% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDL% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures and result > IDL,but < CRDLMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%

Matrix spike recovery = 73.3%Positives in cal blanksBaseline instability in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference = 52.1%Baseline instability in cal blanks

December 13, 1999INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS"REPORT (continued)

Case Number; 27547Project NumberSite: Palmetto

Sample No.571

S72

: 00-0013Recyc liner.

ElementAlSbCrFeMnHgK

AlSbMnHgK

Columbia,

FlaqUJUUJRJ

UJJRJ

SC

ReasonPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Baseline instability in cal blanksPositives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =

Positives in cal blanksMatrix spike recovery = 73.3%Matrix spike recovery = 149%Blind spike recovery < action limitSerial dilution per cent difference =

52.1%

52.1%

-TALS bAlviri_c era - iv ocou,

Sample 558METALS SCAN

Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

Project: 00-0013

SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR98 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN

Produced by. Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 15:40Ending:

RESULTS3202.1UJ2.2'J20

0.10U0.30U

2600U0.40U

3.52.4

11001.2

2400140J1.9J13

200J1.8U

0.40U7700

2.1U0.50U

14NA

UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/L

ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE

CYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is Known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

:000 Project: 00-0013


Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 10:30Ending:

RESULTS35U

2.1UJ2.2U42

0.1 OU0.30U48000.30U

8.40.50U9300

1.1U4000

650J0.10UR

18250J1.8U

0.40U7200

2.1U0.50U

13UNA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKEL .POTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUM ;

THALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE


A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

.'it I Al_O GMIVlT I-C. AMM/AL. I 01 IV r IUUUV.UWM ucue. u i/ i i/^uuu i*>.


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER

:000 Project: 00-0013

SCCase No: 27547MD No: RSOO Inorg Contractor. SENTIN


RESULTS35U

2.1UJ2.2U65

0.1 OU0.30U74000.30U3.01.0U

40001.1U

570031 OJ

0.10UR6.2330J1.8U

0.40U7200

2.1U0.50U

17NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ' ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE



.£TALi>


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRTUBMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

L000 Project: 00-0013

SCCase No: 27547MD No; RS01 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN

Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/199908:20Ending:

RESULTS35U

2.1UJ2.2U

0.80U0.1 OU0.30U2600U0.30U0.60U0.50U

19U1.1U39U

2.4U0.1 OUR

1.3U3.2UJ1.8U

0.40U160U2.8U

0.50U13U

NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ' ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE


^-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.3-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems. 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2 constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

'ETALS SAMPLt

Sample 562METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRPB1MW/Media: GROUNDWATER

- KCOIUW iv ocou, MI

Project: 00-0013

SCCase No: 27547MD No: RS02 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN


RESULTS35U

2.1UJ2.2U

0.801)0.10U0.30U2600U0.30U0.60U0.50U

60U1.1U39U

2.4U0.10UR

1.3U13UJ

1.8U0.40U160U2.2U

0.50U17

NA





ETALS SAMPLt AIWM.TGIG - KCkJlUN IV C5C.OU, M I I* IWl iUWL

Sample 563METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01DMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

Project: 00-0013

SCCase No: 27547MD No: RRS8 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN

Produced by: Guihrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/01/1999 15:30Ending:

RESULTS35U

2.1UJ4.71)34

0.1 OU0.30U52000.80U

8.80.80U6800

3.23600660J0.1 OUR

12. 290J

1.8U0.40U

110002.1U

0.50U28

NA



iYANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED


1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESU, Al HLNS, rrouucuon uaie: u i / i i/^uuu 10.00

Sample 564;METALS SCAN

Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0013



RESULTS35U

2.1UJ4.4U18

0.10U0.30U5000

1.2U11

0.50U8800

1.1U40001200J0.10UR

23. 270J

1.8U0.80U9500

2.1U0.50U

38NA




A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificationC-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

rTAL5 SAIVlKUt ANALYSIS

Sample 565METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03IMW /Media: GROUNDWATER

00 Project: 00-0013

, SCCase No: 27547MD No: RR90 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN


RESULTS35U

2.1UJ3.2U6.3U

0.10U0.30U32000.30U

130.50U8200

1.1U3900940J

0.10UR22

610J1.8U

0.40U6300

2.1U0.50U

39NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVERSODIUM iTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE


A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present resampling and reanatysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.cons!ituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

PETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD^ATHENS, GA


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR3IDMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

000 Project: 00-0013

S^^TI Production Date: 01/11/20

scCase No: 27547MD No: RR91 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN


RESULTS35U

2.1UJ3.9U8.1

0.10U0.30U38000.30U

160.50U9700

1.1U46001100J0.10UR

27700J1.8U

0.40U7100

2.1U0.50U

45NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM . ;SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE

:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED

^.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.^-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.3-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

-TALS era - KCOIUU IV ocou, M i nci^o, f~ I UU UUkltwM I LSOtC. V I/ I I / 4 . V W W IW.W

Sample 567METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER

Project: 00-0013



RESULTS35U

2.1UJ3.7U27

0.1 OU0.30U

51000.30U

7.40.50U

120001.1U

3300770J

0.10UR16

360J1.8U

0.40U8700

2.1U0.50U

13UNA




A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.X-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc Indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Hroaucuon uate: uim/*uuu 10:00

Sample 568METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03DMW /Media: GROUNDWATER

:000 Project: 00-0013


Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor.Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 11:50Ending:

RESULTS35U

2.1UJ2.3U60

0.10U0.30U

120000.30U

7.00.50U

73001.1U

850061 OJ

0.10UR16

430J1.8U

0.40U10000

2.1U0.50U

13UNA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUMSILVER ;SODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE



1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESD^ATHENS, GA

Sample 569METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ3SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

:000 Project. 00-0013

Production Date: 01/11/200QJ3:35


Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 12:20Ending:

RESULTS190U2.1UJ3.0U14

0.1 OU0.40U2600U0.30U

5.50.50U6901.1U

910110J

0.10UR3.8380J1.8U

0.40U5000

2.1U0.50U

18NA




A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

.1ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA - REGION IV SESjMyHENS, GA


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

Project: 00-0013

sam^ri Production Date: 01/11/2



RESULTS9402.1UJ2.2U1.7U

0.1 OU0.30U2600U

1.2U2.83.3

26001.1U

1800260J0.1 OUR9.9

. 270J1.8U

0.40U6100

2.1U1.1U37

NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM . ' 'SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE


-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.-(-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.:'.-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESD^THENS, GA

Sample 571METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02SMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

'000 Project. 00-0013

Production Date: 01/11/200.



RESULTS110U2.1UJ2.2U24

0.10U0.30U

2600U0.30U

7.12.9150U1.1U

990180J

0.10UR13

170J1.8U

0.40U5800

2.1U0.50U

45NA




•'-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.•factual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit,^-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2,constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

;ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SESt^JHENS, GA

Sample 572METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02IMW/Media: GROUNDWATER

000 Project: 00-0013

Production Date: 01/11/20

scCase No: 27547MDNo: RR97 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN


RESULTS53U

2.1UJ4.19.0

0.10U0.30U36000.30U

150.50U

110001.1U

410091 OJ

0.10UR34

. 180J1.8U

0.40U8000

2.1U0.50U

40NA


ANALYTEALUMINUMANTIMONYARSENICBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCALCIUMCHROMIUMCOBALTCOPPERIRONLEADMAGNESIUMMANGANESETOTAL MERCURYNICKELPOTASSIUMSELENIUM ' ;

SILVERSODIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMZINCCYANIDE


-'-.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.•C-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit."Vqc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,^-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA-REGION IV S

Sample 5METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QA009PES /Media: WATSPK

2000 Project: 00-0013

THENS, GA Production Date: 01/11/

, scCase No: 27547MD No: RR87 Inorg Contractor: SENTIN

Produced by: Guthrie, DianeRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 11/02/1999 14:00Ending:0015542

RESULTS35U

2.1U21

0.80U17

8.42600U

1889

2.7751.1U39U

2.4U1.41.3U291.8U

0.40U160U2.1U

0.50U600

NA



3YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.:3,-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.3-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION 4, SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION

ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2720 •'

4SESD-EIB " MAY 0 9 2000

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Palmetto Recycling Site DataColumbia, South CarolinaSESD Project Number: 00-0256

FROM: Tim Simpson, Environmental ScientistSuperfund and Air Section /'

THRU: Archie Lee, Chief <^x^"^"Superfund and Air Section

TO: Yvonne Jones, RPMNorth Site Management BranchWaste Management Division

Attached are the analytical results for the groundwater samples collected on the week of

March 20, 2000 at.the Pal.rne.tto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. The results

indicated that mercury (0.35 UG/L) was detected in one sample (PR04S). This is the same

well that contained low levels of mercury in the November 1999 sampling event. If you have any

questions, please call me at 706-355-8736.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion 4



MEMORANDUM

Date: 05/04/2000

Subject: Results of METALS Sample Analysis00-0256 Palmetto Recycling

SC

From: White, TerriTo: Simpson, Tim

CC: SESD/EIB/HWS

Thru: Scifres, JennyChief, Inorganic Chemistry Section • " •Analytical Support Branch

Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.

ATTACHMENT

gordonn

gordonn

gordonn

METALS SAMPL»YSIS

2000

ERA - REGION IV S


Facility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QAEB1 /Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK

2000 Project: 00-0256

HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/:

SC

Produced by: White, TerriRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 12:45Ending:

RESULTS1.0U1.0U

NA1.0U

0.50U0.50U

1.0U5.0U1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0U

0.50U2.0U1.0U1.0U

NA1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0USOU

NA0.20U

40U2.0U

0.40U0.020U0.040U0.20U

0.020U

UNITSUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LUG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/LMG/L

ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUM (COPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM ;:IRONSODIUM l

POTASSIUM

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-ma.terial was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.u-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems:. 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

METALS SAMPL ERA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/: 5:07

Sample 4232METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ11/Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

,sc


RESULTS1.0U1.1

NA21

0.50U0.50U

125.0U1.0U

0.50U231.0U

0.50U2.0U1.0U30

NA1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0USOU

NA0.20U

40U1300

4.73.91010

0.21


ANALYTE :

SILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUM .MAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •

METALS SAMPL EPA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/

Sample 4229 ~FY 2000 Project: 00-0256METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto Recycling , SCProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01S/Media: GROUNDWATER


RESULTS1.0U1.0U

NA4.0

0.50U0.50U

1.0U5.0U2.1

0.50U8.31.0U

0.50U2.0U1.0U5.9

NA1.9

0.50U1.0U1.0USOU

NA0.20U300

241.62.4

0.637.9

0.19


ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUM ' ;TITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRON :•SODIUMPOTASSIUM

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 !when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .

METALS SAMPL EPA - REGION IV SE HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/2 :07

Sample 4231METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR03S /Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

,sc


RESULTS1.0U1.4

NA16

0.50U0.52

7.55.0U2.2

0.50U5.81.2

0.50U2.0U1.0U6.0

NA2.0

0.50U1.0U1.2SOU

NA0.20U570130

0.661.01.36.8

0.34


ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUM =NICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUM ;VANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

Vaverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of.material.>\-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. -U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.0-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

METALS SAMP LYSIS ERA-REGION IV S HENS, GA Production Date: OS/04/ 5:07

Sample 4230METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: RR02S/Media: GROUNDWATER

rY 2000 Project: 00-0256

,SC


RESULTS1.0U1.0U

NA29

0.50U0.50U

8.45.0U4.7

0.50U15

1.0U0.50U

2.0U1.0U3.8

NA1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0USOU

NA0.20U

91170J

0.40U1.0

0.062A7.1J

0.13


ANALYTE "SILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

QC RESULTS FOR MANGANESE AND SODIUM ARE ABOVE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence oi' material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •

METALS SAMPL LYSIS EPA - REGION IV S IfHENS, GA Production Date: OS/04/

Sample 4233METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ4S/Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

SC


RESULTS1.0U2.8

NA26

0.50U0.50U

5.05.0U4.0

0.50U16

1.50.50U

2.0U1.0U7.6

NA5.7

0.50U3.61.0USOU

NA0.3514001701.62.72.910

0.53


ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM " :

IRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

•Vaverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantisation limit.^-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents Z.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

METALS SAMPLE, YSIS EPA-REGION IV SES [HENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/2 :07

Sample 4234™METALS SCANFacility: PalmettoProgram: SSFId/Station: PRQ4I /

™ "^ 2000 Project: 00-0256 "^^ Produced by: White, Terri ^Requestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSON

Recycling , SC _ . Beginning: 03/21/2000 10:23Ending:

w

Media: GROUNDWATER

RESULTS UNITS1 .OU UG/L1.9 UG/L

NA UG/L46 UG/L

0.50U UG/L0.50U UG/L

12 UG/L5.0U UG/L1.0U UG/L

0.50U UG/L23 UG/L

1.0U UG/L0.50U UG/L

2.0U UG/L1.0U UG/L40 UG/L

NA UG/L1.0U UG/L

0.50U UG/L1.0U UG/L1.0U UG/LSOU UG/L

NA UG/L0.20U UG/L

40U UG/L890 UG/L5.3 MG/L4.5 MG/L12 MG/L

9.2 MG/L0.24 MG/L

ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUMCOBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEAD . :ANTIMONYSELENIUMTINSTRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUMIRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

METALS SAMPL LYSIS EPA - REGION IV S ITHENS, GA Production Date: 05/04/i

Sample 4235METALS SCANFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: QAPRE /Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK

Y 2000 Project: 00-0256

,SC


RESULTS1.0U1.0U

NA1.0U

0.50U0.50U

1.0U5.0U1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0U

0.50U2.0U1.0U1.0U

NA1.0U

0.50U1.0U1.0USOU

NA0.20U

40U2.0U

0.40U0.020U0.092

0.20U0.020U


ANALYTESILVERARSENICBORONBARIUMBERYLLIUMCADMIUM *COBALTCHROMIUMCOPPERMOLYBDENUMNICKELLEADANTIMONYSELENIUMTIN " :STRONTIUMTELLURIUMTITANIUMTHALLIUMVANADIUMYTTRIUMZINCZIRCONIUMTOTAL MERCURYALUMINUMMANGANESECALCIUMMAGNESIUM -IRONSODIUMPOTASSIUM

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion.4



MEMORANDUM

Date: 03/28/2000

Subject: Results of CLASSICALS/NUTRIENTS Sample Analysis00-0256 Palmetto Recycling

SC

From: Tnomason, John

To: Simpson, Tim

CC: SESD/EIB/HWS

Thru: Scifres, JennyChief, Inorganic Chemistry Section -: • • - - - - -Analytical Support Branch

Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have anyquestions, please contact me.

ATTACHMENT

gordonn

gordonn

gordonn

CLASSICALS/N TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV S THENS, GA Production Date: 03/28 5:53

Sample 422SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01S/Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

,sc

Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 13:25Ending:

RESULTS UNITS4.7A MG/L

ANALYTECHLORIDE

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum qua'ntitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

CLASSICALS/NU

0^^

kTS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV SE HENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2

Sample 4230SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR02S /Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

,SC


RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE7.9 MG/L CHLORIDE

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .

CLASSICALS/NU TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ERA-REGION IV S pTHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/

Sample 4231SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: RR03S/Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

,SC


RESULTS UNITS3.5 MG/L

ANALYTECHLORIDE

A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given: U-materia! was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: l.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane •

CLASSICALS/N SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV THENS, GA Production Date:

Sample

SPECIFIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR01 1 /Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

, SC

Produced by: Thomason, JohnRequestor:Project Leader: TSIMPSONBeginning: 03/20/2000 14:10Ending.


A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: Lwhen no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane

CLASS1CALS/NU TS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA - REGION IV S GA Production Date:

Sample 4233SPEC.FIED TESTSFacility: Palmetto RecyclingProgram: SSFId/Station: PR04S /Media: GROUNDWATER

2000 Project: 00-0256

, SC



A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAI-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence cf material.K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum qua'ntitalion limit.R-qc indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present, resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.C-confirmed by gems: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane .

LAWGlBB

February 16, 2001

Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfiind Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104

Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02

Dear Ms. Jones:

Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to submit three copies of theAnnual Ground-Water and Analysis Report on behalf of Lucent Technologies Inc. (Lucent). Weare pleased to report that lead was not detected in any of the well samples.

Should you have any questions or comments concerning the enclosures, please contact CynthiaDraper at (770) 421-3565.

Sincerely,

LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

lia E. Draper, P.E, Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Senior Engineer Principal

cc: Steve Oberkrom

LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive, NW. Suite 100 • Kennesaw. GA 301'

770-421-3-100

AWGlBB

February 16, 2001

Mr. Steve OberkromEnvironmental Liabilities ManagerLucent Technologies, Inc.777 North Blue ParkwayLees- Summit, MO 64086

Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02

Dear Mr. Oberkrom:

Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide this report for thesampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto RecyclingShe (She) located in Columbia, South Carolina (Figure 1). The ground-water sampling and analysisprocedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,

1999) to be conducted annually for a five year period following the completion of the RA excavation andremoval activities. This report summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the secondannual sampling event.

Regulatory Status

As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with concentrations above 400 ppmwere excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A pre-final inspection of the Site by the USEPA and SCDHEC was held in February 1999 and confirmed thatthe RA activities had been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List(NPL) in October 2000.

LAW Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive, NW. Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144

770-421-3400

Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site. Columbia. South CarolinaLucent Technologies. Inc..Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02

February 16. 2001

In accordance with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that the

ground water be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead for a five-year period. The first annual

ground-water monitoring event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. Lead concentrations

in all ground-water samples were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking

water. The results of the second annual monitoring event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.

Field Procedures

The authorized field work was conducted from October 30, 2000 through November 2, 2000 and included

sampling twelve monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, D, MW-2S, 1, D, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) foranalysis of total and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring well locations are provided onFigure 2.

All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to the sampling of each well.Prior to purging of each well, the ground water depth was measured and documented. The wells werethen purged using a low-flow purging technique until three well volumes were removed. After theremoval of three well volumes, the wells were sampled and the liquid analyzed by a certified laboratoryfor dissolved and total lead. Due to slow recharge (0.25 gallon/hour), MW-1I and MW-2I had only one totwo well volumes purged prior to sampling. The purged water was drummed and temporarily stored onSite. The water will be transported to and treated by AMBAC International upon their approval.

Laboratory Results

The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table. The laboratory

analytical results reports are attached.

Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site

Monitoring Well

MW-1SMW-1I

MW-1DMW-2SMW-2I

Date

11/01/0011/02/0010/31/0010/30/0011/02/00

Total Lead(me/I)

NDNDNDNDND

DissolvedLead (me/I)

NDNDNDNDND

Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc., Morristown, New JerseyLAW Project 41-2603-02

February 16, 2001

Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site(Continued)

Well

MW-2DMW-3SMW-3IMW-3D

*MW-13D (DUP)MW-4SMW-4I

*MW-14I (DUP)MW-4D

Rinse Blank IRinse Blank IIRinse Blank III

Date

11/01/0010/31/0010/31/0010/30/0010/30/0010/31/0010/31/0010/31/0011/01/0010/30/0010/31/0011/1/00

Total Lead

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DissolvedLeadNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.*MW-13D is the field duplicate of MW-3D.*MW-14I is the field duplicate of MW-4I.

Lead was not detected in the ground-water samples above the detection limit. These results are consistent

with the results from the previous ground-water sampling events conducted by the USEPA.

Should you have any comments or questions on the ground-water sampling results, please call Cynthia E.

Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.

Sincerely,


Cynthia E. Draper, P.E.Senior Engineer

Attachments

V Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com

LOG NO

S E V E R N

SERVICESSTL Savannah

LOG NO: SO-07475Received: 31 OCT 00Reported: 13 NOV 00

Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-260302

Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By: Client

Code: 104401113REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1

DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED

D7475-1D7475-2D7475-3D7475-4

MW-2SMW-3DMW-13DRinse Blank 1

10-30-00/16:2510-30-00/15:5010-30-00/12:0010-30-00/16:10

PARAMETER 07475-1 07475-2 07475-3 07475-4

'..ead. (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date

^Analysis DateFBatch ID

Lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

STL Savannah is s part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stHnc.com

,OG NO

S E V E R N


"~" LOG NO: SO-07475Received: 31 OCT 00Reported: 13 NOV 00




DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED

7475-5 Method Blank7475-6 Lab Control Standard % Recovery

'ARAMETER 07475-5 07475-6

.ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis Date

(Jatch ID

jad, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

<0.00501

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

94 %1

11 .01 .0011.02.00

1101L

94 %1

11.01.0011.02.00

1101L

These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.

T)lloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager

Final Page Of Report

STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc.

S E V E R N

SERV1CES

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stlnnc.com STL Savannah—————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07494

Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00

Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02

Project: Palmetto RecyclingSampled By. Client


DATE/NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED

37494-137494-237494-337494-437494-5

MW-1DRinse Blank 2MW-14IMW-3SMW-4S

10-31-00/16:0010-31-00/15:3510-31-00/12:0010-31-00/12:0010-31-00/14:00

PARAMETER 07494-1 07494-2 07494-3 07494-4 07494-5

Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution Factor

kprep Date"Analysis DateBatch ID

Lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0C11.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

STL Savannah is a part p' Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc

S E V E R N

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com

TvRENTSERVICES

STL SavannahLOG NO: SO-07494

Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00

Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144

-OG NO

REPORT OF RESULTS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES

Requisition: 41-2603-02


Code: 105401116Page 2

DATE/TIME SAMPLED

J 7 4 9 4 - 6)7494-7

MW-3IMW-4I

10-31-00/15:0010-31-00/16:50

3ARAMETER 07494-6 07494-7

,ead (6010), mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

fead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

STL Savannah is a part of Seve-n Trent Laboratories, Inc.


,OG NO

S E V E R N


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07494Received: 01 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00





17494-8 Method Blank17494-9 Lab Control Standard % RecoveryJ7494-10 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

3ARAMETER

..ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis Date•3citch ID

jead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

07494-8

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

<0.00501

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

07494-9

92 %1

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

92 %1

11.02.0011.03.00

1102H

07494-10

75-125 %

75-125 %•

. .'.

These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.

Gloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager


STL Savannah is a part of Seve.-n Trent l..3bo.ratories, Inc.


S E V E R N


LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00


,OG NO

REPORT OF RESULTS




Code: 154601114Page 1

DATE/TIME SAMPLED

7519-17519-27519-37519-4

MW-1SMW-2DMW-4DRinse Blank III

11-01-0011-01-0011-01-0011-01-00

ARAMETER 07519-1 07519-2 07519-3 07519-4

,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Datekvnalysis Date^atch ID

<ead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

STL Savannah i? a part of Severn Trent Laborato-ies. Inc.


NO

S E V E R NT R E N T


—————————————————————————————=——————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00





J7519-5 Method Blank57519-6 Lab Control Standard % RecoveryD7519-7 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

?ARAMETER

Lead, Dissolved (6010), mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

07519-5 07519-6

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

100 %1

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

07519-7

^ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

100 %1

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

75-125 %

. . .

75-125

ST1. Savannah is a Dart of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc.

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-inc.com

,OG NO

S E V E R NT/RENT


————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00





7519-8 Matrix Spike Result7519-9 Matrix Spike % Recovery7519-10 Matrix Spike Duplicate Result7519-11 Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery7519-12 MS Accuracy Advisory Limit (%R)

ARAMETER 07519-8 07519-9 07519-10 07519-11 07519-12

,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorLPrep Date'Analysis DateBatch ID

0.4701

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

94 %1

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

0.4741

11.03.0011.06.00

1103G

95 %1

11.03.0011 .06 .00

1103G

75-125 %...------. . .

,ead, Dissolved (6010), mg/1 0.487 97 % 0.494 99 * 75-125 %Dilution Factor 1 l l 1 ---Prep Date 11.03.00 11.03.00 11.03.00 11.03.00Analysis Date 11.06.00 11.06.00 11.06.00 11.06.00 ---Batch ID 1103G 1103G 1103G 1103G

STL Savannah is a oar; of Severn Trent Laboratories, l^c

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stl-mc.com

jOG NO

S E V E R NT i R E N T


————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07519Received: 02 NOV 00Reported: 14 NOV 00





17519-13 Precision (%RPD) MS/MSD

'ARAMETER

(6010) , %

. Dissolved (6010), %

07519-13

1.1 %

2.0 %

SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.

Jloria D. Fulwood, Project Manager


STL Savannah is z part of Sewn Tien! Laboratories. Inc.

S E V E R N/ T R E N T



LOG NO: SO-07570Received: 03 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00


,OG NO

REPORT OF RESULTS




Code: 105401116Page 1

DATE/TIME SAMPLED

57570-1 MW1-I17570-2 MW2-I

'ARAMETER

,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

"ead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

1111

07570-1

<0.00501

11.06.0011.08.00

1106L

<0.00501

11.06.0011.08.00

1106L

-02-00-02-00

07570-2

<0.00501

11.06.0011.08.00

1106L

<0.00501

11.06.0011.08.00

1106L

STL Savannah is a part of Sevorn Trent Laboratories. Inc.

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • wvm.stl-inc.com

.OG NO

S E V E R N


————————————————————————————————————————————————————— LOG NO: SO-07570Received: 03 NOV 00Reported: 15 NOV 00





17570-3 Method Blank17570-4 Lab Control Standard % Recovery17570-5 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

'ARAMETER

.,ead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DatekBatch ID

.lead, Dissolved (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

07570-3

<0.00501

11.06.0011.07.00

1106L

<0.00501

11.06.0011.07.00

1106L

07570-4

89 %1

11.06.0011.07.00

1106L

89 %1

11.06.0011.07.00

1106L

07570-5

75-125 %

75-125 %

These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.



STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc

Jttr

j S CD 2816 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-3994 Fax: (850) 878-9504

• L sab o raa 1 o" U» " ^^^^^^HJj n (t r.nniM S<>v«in Trmt Uitxwatonfts. Inc.

^PROJECT REFERENCE

JSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER I fr~

C:TW>r\ft VuA\AiQDc3kCUENT (SITE) PM ..1 1 L V\v .jOrrtVl^ \ r"'ftCJ«r

CLIENT VAME »

PROJECT NO.

IA \ ~/5(.o cP.O. NUMBER

CLIENT PHONE

C_? 900 Lakeside Drive, Mobile, AL 36693 Phone: (334) 666-6633 Fax: (334) 666-6696

PROJECT LOCATION

~\ri_ C->O (STATE) ^COJ n-O^l ov_CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT FAX

iJJ^H'OO ^-^O^S-l ^4?CLIENT EMAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS

COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)/ '

SAMPLEDATE

U-2.-OC\\-a-or

ij

TIME

>

SAMPLE

/•»s &vJ l (\A- 3>O \HM

IDENTIFICATION

TY\u,\.T«\UO^T-

JRELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)

x?. XL*.,,RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)

^^DATE

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIC"«JURE)

DATE

Ilk loo

MATRIXTYPE

£5

0

sccGtro

CO

MP

OS

ITE

(C

)

AQU

EOU

S (

WAT

ER)

/s

H

_j

LID

OR

SE

MI

°5

D (O

IL. S

OLV

ENT.

ETC

)

O

toDOUJDOZOz

REQUIRED ANALYSES

11

ANUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

1

f

TIME RELINQU>SHED BY: (SIGNATURE) ^x

C^6lu^/ I/O ]XTIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) ""- — '

ii

DATE

H'eP-ODDATE

TIME

TIME

PAGE OF

STANDARD REPORT _^^DELIVERY C_J

DATE DUE

EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH*

D

TED REPORTRY QvnoE) — '

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT:

REMARKS

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)

RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)

LABORATORY USE ONLY

TIME CUSTODY INTACT

gfP YESNO

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL-SL LOG NO.

DATE TIME

DATE TIME

LABORATORY REMARKS:

^v^^DMIMML. Y OIO HCVJUCC3 1 MIMU OnMIlM \jr OUO 1 UL» T nCOVTint/ ^(» 5102LaRoche Aven;ie. Savannah. GA 31404 Phone- (912) 354-7858 Fax: (012) 352-0165

CZ5 2846 Industrial Plaz.l Drive. Tallahassee. FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-399J Fax: (850) 678-9504

Cj 900 Lakeside Drive. Mobile. AL 36G93 Phone: (33J) 656-663.T Fax: (3341 666-6696

PROJECT REFERENCE

\ ft\rr\tf\h) \^e<LJC.Vr\cSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER /+ d

r \ • ! _ ; . 1T"\or. ft i \>L\i,iV»jr>e''CLIENT (SITE) PM

T^ EVvr.rJL.Ul

PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION

Li\ — O/ V-xTk *- f O-C^L (STATE) ^V"*

P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX

"^"lo Ui3ii 3 HOO ~)TO 4^i\ SH^GJCLIENT EMAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS

»3A(5 o 1 OLor\ \s\rxr l-^f r^J i y>J. jLi }~\T£ \ooCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable):

SAMPLEDATE

U-l\ v - \\ v - \\M\V-1\H

TIME

jjors!

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

rv\u-i-i<=)mtJ-J}^KMJ-4C^

\V\U3- 2\^> rpc5K\VO- Oh 51',rN<;c. fcWVtTf

"^-tof i xjr^>rcs/-c\;i>d ^f»^>l/-s> '.

\N\tncA-i p*-W»Avj lAorNp. Exrr\)jc\\ N

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) —————


MATRIXTYPE

LtJ

OCQ

CEOLtO

0

CO

MP

OS

ITE

AQ

UE

OU

S (

WA

TER

)

gOin

SO

LID

OR

SE

MI

D (O

IL.

SOLV

ENT,

ET

C)

NO

NAQ

UEO

US

LIQ

UI

REQUIRED ANALYSES

3

0O_9

^J

&

1

I

1 1 1NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

1

f

f

\

\

\

PATL> • / TIME^ — RELINQUISHED' BY: >STSNATURE) r — •1 i \t ' \C ^/(AJS-^_ j Ju^^ ^\

DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)

1

1

1

\

1

\

DATE

;\\-\*ATE

TIME

TIME '

PAGE . °lSTANDARD REPORT —^DELIVERY CJ

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE

O

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED PERSHIPMENT.

REMARKS

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE

RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE

LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE)

L/ /)f~N Urv-"*<^

DATE TIME CUSTODY INTACT

uiz.) o ^V& YES• NO

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL-SL LOG NO.

TIME

TIME

LABORATORY REMARKS:

ORI

GIN

AL

,\J^^r

RPsBiE vi-niig.au*~= ^=

^^^^T""" j'

AINALYUIS) ritZUUCa AINU UI-IAIN Uf UUSIUUT HtÛTTCT qg) 5102 LnRoche Avenue, Savannan, UA JM04 Hnone- isiî a3J-/n:«i raTû, li^-uiba

CD 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-3994 Fax: (850) 878-9504

C~) 900 Lakeside Drive. Mobile. AL 36693 Phone: (334) 666-6633 Fa«. (334) 666-6696

PROJECT REFERENCE

r'PAcneun *^fl ^c.\.r>vSTL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER (^ (J

CLIENT (SITE) PM

CLIENT ME

PROJECT NO.

P.O. NUMBER

CLIENT PHONE

7"7o|l2.l-2>t-iOO

PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) .<•£»

CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT FAX

CLIENT EMAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS

cj£lOO I Oi f-% Tt>\Pu IXs X.<=/W 5>FiLv3 , CJ PJ oD\HM•COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable):

g SAMPLEj DATE

|r»)3l JOO

l# /3 \I601031/00

:'

...

TIME

\k :oo^\3ÎZM

IJXT&:


pr\lO- \t>

/Auu- HZ

T^r i^ptr^fv*^ ^K-i^-

V^^^^^\^^ ^Pr-c&rÛr-*" ^ \ I

7 i • i


y 1//£• ' // /&?~1»/4SI

RECEIVED BY: SIGNATURE)

DATE TIME

DATE TIME

MATRIXTYPE

CO

MPO

SITE

(C

) O

R G

RA

B (G

) IN

DICA

TE

AQ

UE

OU

S (

WA

TER

)

XK

SO

LID

OR

SE

MIS

OLI

D

NO

NA

OU

EO

US

LIQ

UID

(OIL

. S

OLV

EN

T, E

TC)

REQUIRED ANALYSES

I

m

<

1

\•

NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

1

1

RELINQUISHED BY: •ÎG!ATURE) .

DECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) Qfi

\

\

t

D/nE ,

DATE

TIME

17: 35TIME

•••

PAGE \ °'\STANDARD REPORT __DELIVERY (_}

DATE DUE

EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH

D

TED REPORTRY Q^PGE) ^-s


REMARKS


RECEIVED BY: (SGNATURE)

LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY: DATE? / TIME CUSTODY INTACT

^>NO

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL-SL LOG NO.

DATE TIME

DATE TIME

LABORATORY REMARKS:

<f

OR

IGIN

AL

L-t ^D

CD 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive, Tallahassee. FL 32301 Phone: (850) 878-399-1 Fax- (850) 878-9504

IRil O 900 Lakosid" Drive. Mobile, AL 36693 Phone:(334)666-6633 Fax:(334)666-6696

A rtr^tnn nl Sr>wern [rftnt l..il>OMlnri«c. hr..

PJSQJECT REFERENCK \ L( CX-A^-t-Q jp "O TvuGucJii fl

STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER \ \

CLIENT (SITEI PM .

CLIENT^1|\ME

LAv)CLIENT ADDRESS

^- \^>Cc^<i-S

PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION

yl~3&o3'0^ (STATE) <^d.P.D. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX

CLIENT EMAIL

*« fi»*tJ Dr. knr«^cu^ £A zowyCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable): ' / S

SAMPLEDATE

(O/ 2//0O(ohlfaoIt /SI/DO

(*h(foo

TIME

!1\OO]U\OO

\f:oo'16 : toJUoTF ',


/Aw - J> $/A U3 - Ll <>M w - S A\ w - V-^

7=br Ltnpft-s^rJfcdl dArv^lr^ -T^r^sr T?'Hey\ -V- T>rrs<^fGe)nvr\<rci^feL/ LL,(£ri€r rVr-r-ipt———————— / -4 —— —— — L_

*RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)

RECEIVED B1/ (SIGNATURE)

MATRIXTYPE

CO

MP

OS

ITE

(C

) O

R G

RA

B (

G)

INDI

CATE

AQU

EOU

S (

WAT

ER)

K3hkxiiS

OLI

D O

R S

EM

ISO

LIC D

(CIL

, S

OLV

EN

T,

ET

C)

NO

NA

OU

EO

US

LIQ

UI

REQUIRED ANALYSES

1*^f^

^^^^

C5\ tJ

' ^^ ,NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

1

I

i

1

DATE, . TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATUHW r ~^/ Q/-t ' / J * — 1 ^s.

DATE/ TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)

/1I1

DATE

DATE

TIME

TIME '

;.

,

« 0, ;

STANDARD REPORT _^DELIVERY C_)

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY f-~\(SUnCHAPGE) —


REMARKS

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

X)RtCEIVEDBY:(SGNATURE) DATE TIME

LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE)^? S

'^t/^^' ———

DATE' i TIME CUSTODY INTACT

/ ' NO

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL-SL LOG NO. LABORATORY REMARKS:

OR

IGIN

AL

r\.^^^r

J S§ ~ O 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive. Tallahassce. FL 32301 Phone:(850)878-3994 Fax:(850)878-9504

rt t£&L&jftjJb9CIu|.U ^— ^ 900 Lakeside D'ive. Mobile. AL 36693 Phon»- (334) 666-6633 Fax: (334) 6(56-6696

f« ^0 .*«,„ .C

^PROJECT REFERENCE -_ ' ,

3STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER fx J

fSvSfiCc. l^rcUKLS

I L~~T\VJ J£A-V 'i fcH^jf-^-^cqe^

PROJECT NO.

P.6. NUMBER

CLIENT RHONE

PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) / /*

CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT FAX

CLIENT EMAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS «

.T300 7^* /*^ -2V Kw.«je.<xt.tus GA W/V^COMPANY CONTRACTINI/THIS WORK (il applicable): ' /i

S SAMPLE? DATE

^\Dl&looj/2)/!)6/OO

J/0/W°^

P/3J/PO

i}j

TIME

\B ',^616 '.50& • oo\(, ',\0

< h


/AiJ-^L-5AAu;- ?>bMu/- libA TM kr 1

^c1, fv v*pf*.stsrtJL dfisJlvzJL-' 7,/^s^ -fil-t«_r cwvj_ p/i»'

/;fe)A/ ftZ&^z-PT'f In*!•^= - " ——— ; ————— -^ /^


.0 si/


DATE TIME

DATE TIME

MATRIXTYPE

CO

MP

OS

ITE

(C

) O

R G

RA

B (

G)

INDI

CATE

/sf

^

AQ

UE

OU

S (

WA

TER

)

IXXXPC

<3

/

1-

SO

LID

OR

SE

MIS

OLI

Dav

d

eN

ON

AQ

UE

OU

S L

.QU

ID (

OIL

. S

OLV

EN

T. E

TC)

f^v

TiXVM.\

REQUIRED ANALYSES

^

0

1

£>o 1

0

t iNUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

I

|

1

1

•* S»

W

RELINQUISHED BtY^eiGNATUREl /] .

ffltCEIVED BY: (siGNATiM^

i

1

|

|

"V j)4«j

r M£K

*— n

DATE

DATE

-r/J-dea£i

TIME

I7-/5"TIME

41

PAGE

STANDDELIVE

D

EXPEDDELIVE(SURCH

D

OF1 /ARO REPORT _-RY Cj

ATE DUE ______ .. ___ .

TED REPORTRY Q4RGE) ^— '


REMARKS



LABORATORY USE ONLY

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY B#: DATE/ TIME CUSTODY INTACT

<E5>TJO

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL-SL LOG NO.

5%) 9 *?5

DATE TIME

DATE TIME

LABORATORY REMARKS:

.

OR

IGIN

AL

LAWGlBB 1 FILE COPY4652 4466 1284February 5, 2002

Ms. Yvonne JonesNorth Superfund Site ManagementRegion IV, USEPA61 Forsyth StreetAtlanta, GA 30303-3104

Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc.LAW Project 41-2603-02

Dear Ms. Jones:

Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide the enclosed report for

the sampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto

Recycling Site (Site) located in Columbia, South Carolina. The ground-water sampling and analysis

procedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,

1999). The ground-water sampling is to be conducted annually for a five-year period following the

completion of the RA excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field

procedures and the laboratory results of the third annual sampling event.

The results of the third annual sampling event are provided in the enclosed report and show that lead was

not detected in any of the ground-water samples. The analytical results for lead for this sampling eventand the previous events indicate that the lead concentrations in the groundwater samples are below

drinking water standards.

Should you have any comments or questions on the ground-water sampling results, please call Cynthia E.Draper at (770) 421-3565 or Joe Chikowski at (732) 793-3531.


„.Cyjlthia E. Draper, ?',.E. Frederick K. Marotte, P.ESejnior Engineer " Principal

Attachmentscc: Joe Chikowski

i_AW Engineering an:.' Envnoniiic-niai Se; vices. Inc.3200 Town Point l>ive NW Suite 100 • Kenr.oia-.v. GA 30'-)J

77Q-.1?;-3-100 • - a x - 770 421-3^36

LAWGlBB

February 4, 2002

4652 4466 1295Mr. Joe Chikowski25 East Pelican WayOcean Beach, Unit IIILavallette, NJ 08735

Subject: Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia,Soitth CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project No.: 41-2603-02

Dear Mr. Chikowski:

Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (LAW) is pleased to provide this report for the

sampling and analysis of ground water from the ground-water monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling

Site (Site) located in Columbia, South Carolina (Figure 1). The ground-water sampling and analysis

procedures were performed in general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2,

1999). The ground-water sampling is to be conducted annually for a five-year period following the

completion of the RA excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field

procedures and the laboratory results of the third annual sampling event.

Regulatory Status

As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with concentrations above 400 ppmwere excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A pre-fmal inspection of the Site by the USEPA and SCDHEC was held in February 1999 and confirmed that

the RA activities had been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List(NPL) in October 2000.

LAW Engiriefti'ir.g and Erv:,-cn:v;<T-.;2: Services. Inc.3200 Town Poirv; Drive NW S..M-C- 100 - Kenncs.T.v. C»A 301-14

770-4^1 -3-JOO • r;v<- 770-421-3486

Annual Ground- Water Sampling and Analysis Report February- 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia. South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLA W Project 41-2603-02Page 2 of 4


ground water be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead for a five-year period. The first annualground-water monitoring event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999 and the second annual

ground-water monitoring event, led by Lucent, was completed in October 2000. Lead concentrations in

all ground-water samples for both sampling events were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level

(MCL) for drinking water. The results of the third annual monitoring event, conducted by Lucent, are

provided herein.

Field Procedures

The fieldwork was conducted from December 3, 2001 through December 5, 2001 and included sampling

eleven monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, D, MW-2S, D, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) for analysis of total

and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). Due to slow recharge at MW-2I and an appearance of a high

level of turbidity, approval was obtained from Yvonne Jones of the USEPA to return on the following

week with a different pump, capable of a greater lift, to obtain a sample from MW-2I. Yvonne Jones of

the USEPA reported that she informed Jim Bowman of the SCDHEC of the field adjustment. The

monitoring well locations are provided on Figure 2.

All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to the sampling of each well.Prior to purging of each well, the ground-water depth was measured and documented. All wells except

MW-2I were then purged using a low-flow purging technique using a peristaltic pump unt i l three wellvolumes were removed. After the removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled and the liquid

analyzed by a certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to slow recharge (0.25 gallon/4 hour)at MW-2I, the well was purged dry using a Teflon bailer, on December 5, 2001. After the well wasallowed to recharge, a sample was collected and sent to the laboratory. Yvonne Jones of the USEPA wasnotified of the appearance of high turbidity in this sample and the laboratory was notified to put the

sample analysis on hold. At this time, verbal approval was obtained from Yvonne Jones at the USEPA toreturn to the site the following week with more suitable sampling equipment. On Monday December 10,2001 MW-2I was purged dry using a Grundfos Redi-Flo3 Submersible Pump. The well was then allowedto recharge to approximately its original water level and the sample was collected on Tuesday, December

11, 2001. The sample collected from MW-2I on December 11, 2001, contained less turbidity then thanthe previous sample sent to the laboratory for analysis. The December 5, 2001 sample for MW-2I was

Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis Report February 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site. Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project 41-2603-02Page 3 of 4

not analyzed and discarded appropriately. This procedure was verbally approved by Yvonne Jones of the

USEPA and communicated to the SCDHEC The December 11 .sample for MW-2I was analyzed for lead.

Laboratory Results

The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical result reports are attached.

Ground-Water Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site

Monitoring Well

MW-1SMW-1IMW-1DMW-2SMW-2IMW-2D

MW-12D*MW-3SMW-3I

MW-13I*MW-3DMW-4SMW-4IMW-4D

Rinse Blank

Sample Date

12/04/0!12/04/0112/04/0112/04/0112/11/0112/04/0112/04/0112/04/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/0112/05/01

Total Lead(mg/1)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DissolvedLead (mg/1)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.*MW-12D is the field duplicate of MW-2D.*MW-13I is the field duplicate of MW-3I.

Lead was not detected in the ground-water samples above the detection limit. These results are consistentwith the results from the previous ground-water sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.

Annual Ground- Water Sampling and A nalysis Report February 4. 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia. South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesLAW Project 4 1-2603-02Page 4 of 4

Should you have any comments or questions on the ground^KSter sampling results, please call Cynthia E.

Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.

Sincerely,


dthia E. Draper, Pj. Frederick K. Marorte, P.E.

enior Engineer Principal

Attachments

ATTACHMENTS

G:\att\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemap.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am

COLUMBIAHIGHLAND COUNTY

PALMETTORECYCLING

SOURCE: RIAS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994



LAWENQNCCR1NG AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

SITE LOCATION MAP


S E V E R N

5102 URoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stWnc.com

SERVICES

STL Savannah

NO

LOG NO: SI-18062Received: 12 DEC 01Reported: 20 DEC 01



Code: 152011220Page l

DATE/TIME SAMPLED

REPORT OF RESULTS


62-1 MW2I

AMETER

12-11-01/11:20

18062-1

.d (6010) , mg/1lution Factor•ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID

, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1"lution Factorrep Datenalysis Dateatch ID

cO.00501

12.13.0112.15.01

12131

<0.00501

12.13.0112.15.01

1213H

STL Savannah is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc


SERVICES

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.sttnnc.com STL Savannah

NO





—— DATE/SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , QC- REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED

2-2 Method Blank2-3 Lab Control Standard % Recovery2-4 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

METER

1 (6010) , mg/1.ution Factor:p Dateklysis Datefch ID

3, (Dissolved) (6010), mg/1lution Factor2p Datealysis Datetch ID

18062-2

<0.00501

12.13.0112.15.01

12131

<0.00501

12.13.0112.15.01

1213H

18062-3

103 %1

12.13.0112.15.01

12131

106 %1

12.13.0112.15.01

1213H

18062-4

75-125 %...

...

75-125 %

...- - -- - -


jria D. Fulwood, Project Manager


or?.!nr:«5. !nr

mg>J£giJL | f " " ^^ Jiu<: Ldrtuuie avenue rnune. \?iiLt OJH-/OJO i ^

• -T-R-1i-NT- •

IQQQH STL SavannahPROJECT REFERENCE

STLJLAB) PROJECT MANAGERCl4 OC^O^ TV ) 3OrfrSr-\

CUENT (SITE) P.M .

C_AA f^AV\yi Q_ wt TvO -er\CLIENlJRAME *

PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATIONHi3U,0?50P (STATE)P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT PHONE CUENT FAX

CLIENT E-MAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS tt\ V ^ Slf"/

COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)

SAMPLE

>

•"t^T^RTfVl

TIME

\vo-o-H=95?5


IY^J^J^. _"Rn^ - 3^

ARELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)


DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SlG>*

odvaiuidii, un oitu«» rax: jai^j OD/JHJIDO

C_^ Alternate Laboratory Name/ LocationPhone:Fax:

MATRIXTYPE

OR G

RAB

(G)

INDI

CATE

COM

POSI

TE (C

AQUE

OUS

(WAT

ERSO

LID O

R SE

MIS

OLID

rr

NONA

QUEO

US L

IQUI

D (O

IL S

OLVE

NT, .

..)

AJUREX

^^

REQUIRED ANALYSIS

•J

$

i

*j/O

gw

i'

r" s'i ESEf?¥\ V s"VT IV!a


^

^

DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)

(/t^F^"*~> —

DATE

DATE

S)i — — —^

TIME

TIME

PAGE OF

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY (^)

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY Q(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMIHEDPER SHIPMENT:

REMARKS


RECEIVED BY. (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

;.;K£... • LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY:(SIGNATURE!

K/ <2 — *£L~ — -

DATE . -TIME CUSTOD/ INTACT. ''^ YES <C3""~' ——— '

c-sUSTODYEALNO.

STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.

LABORATORY REMARKS ...

ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WITH SAMPLE(S)

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com

NO


SERVICES

STL Savannah

LOG NO: SI- 17845Received: 05 DEC 01

_ __________ Reported: 13 DEC 01Ms. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02




15-115-215-315-415-5

MW1IMW2DMW12DMW2SMW1S

12.12121212

-04-01/08:20-04-01/11:00-04-01/12:00-04-01/16:20-04-01/14:50

AMETER 17845-1 17845-2 17845-3 17845-4 17845-5

d (6010) , mg/1^ution FactorBp Dateralysis Dateitch ID

<

1212

0.00501

.06.01

.10.011206K

<

1212

0.00501

.06.01

.10.011206K

<

1212

0.00501

.06.01

.10.011206K

<

1212

0.00501

.06.01

.10.011206K

<

1212

0 .00501

-06.01- 10.011206K

id, (Dissolved).lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID

(6010), mg/1 <0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

<0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

<0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

<0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

<0 .00501-

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G



SERVICES

STL Savannah

NO




Code: 095211213Page 2

DATE/TIME^SAMPLED

REPORT OF RESULTS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION / LIQUID'SAMPLES

45-6 MW1D45-7 MW3S

12-04-01/13:1012-04-01/16:30

AMETER 17845-6 17845-7

d (6010) , mg/1lution Factorep Date.alysis DateJtch ID

Jd, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1.lution Factorrep Datelalysis Dateitch ID

<0 .00501

12.06.0112.10.01

1206K

< 0 . 0 0 5 01

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

<0 .00501

12.06.0112.10.01

1206K

<0 .00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

STL Savannah is a nnr! n' Swm T--."-t Inho.'riiOnes. lie


SERVICES

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.sttnnc.com STL Savannah





DATE/NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , .QC-REPORT FOR LIQUID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED

.45-8 Method Blank45-9 Lab Control Standard % Recovery45-10 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

LAMETER

id (6010) , mg/1.lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Date

^:ch ID

id, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Llution Factorrep Datelalysis Dateitch ID

17845-8

< 0 . 0 0 5 01

12.06.0112.09.01

1206K

<0 .00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

17845-9

110 %1

12.06.0112.09 .01

1206K

104 %1

12.07.0112.11.01

1207G

17845-10

75-125 %

- - -

75-125 *

- - -


D. Fulwood, Project Manager


STL Savannah is a part oi Severn Trent Laboratories. Inc

^ •••( •••••• H î^r Diu^ LdnuLiie nvL-nue riiuni.-. \~Jiî jj-<-/ujo ^^^^

• T R E N T ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^H•QgtfZ^H STL Savannah

PROJECT REFERENCE

STULAB) PROJECT MANAGER (j

CLIENT (SITE) PM

CLIENT NAME

Z-/1IA/

PROJECT NO.

Hl-{U*{& -D^LP.O. NUMBER

CLIENT PHONE ._

PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) ^(^

CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT FAX

CLIENT E-MAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS, ^Ccjfcc /OO /,a£.OQ ) 0«->rx /UYI,/V'/% /jf l4t*s\f)~if\iAj Lrfl <^(^lf-ft-fCOMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)

SAMPLEt^TE

/^/Worjai^la;Ja./H/ftjlAltf/o'

TIME

(TÂO/looUODIt^-o


mco/TAv w ^l f^MVS/ labfAt; £3


RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE)

DATE

DATE

RECEIVEDFDR LABORATORY M: / /I '„ DATE

/•TIME

TIME

<•._ .> Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:

MATRIXTYPE

&Si3CD

§oo:O0UJ

1U

&UJ

CODOUJ

1

KK•y

Q_tO

UJ

orOQ

8 tr

£UJ

i05

s2

REQUIRED ANALYSIS

I1N,

0

|

\1

*>

*,

4

•

i•

_ . 1•


KKKt*

RELINQUISHED B\ (SIGNATUREh,


K

KK^

DATE

\i\t4o\DATE

TIME

^'}'\7C^

TIME

PAGE OF

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY (^)

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY (^'j,(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT:

REMARKS


1RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

LABORATORY USE ONLY

TIME CUSTODY INTAprYES C(X^

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.

fl T7FK

LABORATOPf REMARKS

^ /

ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WFTH SAMPLE(S)

Savannah, GA 31404

STL SavannahFax: (912) 352-0165

CD Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:

PRUIECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO. PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) ££

MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS

PAGE OF

STL (LAB) PROJECT MAffAGER P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CCltNT (SITE) PM CLIENT PHONE CLIENT FAX

CLIENT NAME3*1 on

CLIENT E-MAIL

CLIENT ADDRESS

J2,«Stccfcc/t)Q

COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (il applicable)

SAMPLEDATE TIME

PO

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AQ SO

PnNUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY

DATE DUE


DATE DUE


REMARKS

ervef<rr

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME R E L I N Q I S H E D BY: DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY. (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE). . . . . . . . . . ... ,.-; .,.,..,.

DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

LABORATORY USE ONLYDATE TIME CUST•ODYlJjrtCT CUSTODY

SEAL NO.STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.

LABORATORY REMARKS

ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WFTH SAMPLE(S)


SERVICES

5102 LaRoche Avenue » Savannah. GA 314Q4 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fan: 912 352 0165 ' wvw.stMnc.com______ STL Savannah



«=\t»wBnMi£rr sProject: Palmetto Recycling

Sampled By: ClientCode: 154411214

Page 1DATE/TIME SAMPLEDNO

REPORT OF RESULTS

SAMPLE DESCR-IPTION , LIQUID SAMPLES

2-12-2.2-3.2-4.2-5

MW-4SMW-4IMW-4DEquipment BlankMW-3D

12-05-01/08:1012-05-01/11:2012-05-01/15:3012-05-01/13:0012-05-01/14:00

METER 17912-1 17912-2 17912-3 17912-4 17912-5

1 (6010), mg/1fcution FactorUp Datealysis Datetch ID

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

<0.00501

12.07.0112 . 10 .01

1207H

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

d, (Dissolved) (6010), mg/1 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050lution Factor 1 1 1 1. 1ep Date 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01 12.07.01alysis Date 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01 12.11.01tch ID 1207K 1207K 1207K 1207K 1207K

S E V E R N

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stlnnc.com

T R E N TSERVICES

STL Savannah

NO




Code: 154411214Page 2

DATE/TIME SAMPLED

REPORT OF RESULTS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION , LIQUJD SAMPLES

12-612-7

MW-3IMW-13I

12-05-01/10:1012-05-01/10:10

AMETER 17912-6 17912-7

d (6010), mg/1lution Factorep Datealysis Datefcch ID

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

<0.00501

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

.d, (Dissolved)

.lution Factor:ep Datelalysis Dateitch ID

(6010), mg/1 <0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207K

<0.00501

12.07.0112.11.01

1207K

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah. GA 31404 • Tel: 912 354 7858 • Fax: 912 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com

; NO


SERVICES

STL SavannahLOG NO: SI-17912

Received: 06 DEC 01Reported: 14 DEC 01

KB. Tara NicholsLaw Engineering and Environmental Services/Remediation Group3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144 Requisition: 41-2603-02




H2-9 Method Blank*12-10 Lab Control Standard * RecoveryJ12-11 LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)

IAMETER 17912-9 17912-10 17912-11

id (6010) , mg/1Llution Factorrep Datetoalysis DateItch ID

ad, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1ilution Factorrep Datenalysis Dateatch ID

<0

12.12.

<0

12.12.

.00501

07.0110.011207H

.00501

07.0111.011207K

105 %1

12.07.0112.10.01

1207H

104 %1

12.07.0112.11.01

1207K

75-125 %

...

75-125 %.........- - -


oria D. Fulwood, Project Manager


T R E N TSERVICES STL Savannah

•102 LaRoche AvenueSavannah, GA 31404

Phone: (912) 354-7858Fax: (912) 352-0165

ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WITH SAMPLE(S)

mtJMLSblflHP " [^^ S1U^ La«ocne Avenue Hhone: (yiii) 3b4-/Bba ^^• T I? P M T ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ iHKittWiiliaMEtUii H^MH^Hl ^ ÛL]lU£]l££&S^

I ^ ^H STL SavannahPROJECT REFERENCE

STL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER 1 C

CT\ ot \ cx, T~Y/sA (j cv^-JCLIENT (SITE) PM

CLIENT N/lwE »

PROJECT NO.

i HI~^l(«O3-O 2lr P.O. NUMBER

CLIENT PHONE

PROJECT LOCATION(STATE) *£(^

CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT FAX

CLIENT E-MAIL

CLOT ADDRESS ^ Jlol^1-!


SAMPLEDATE

M/5^y\

*

TIME

if 00\0(0io\o\12>O

• .


^\i^~30AXc-u - 3~E-rûo-i^x^\^0 - i^H "^L .

\Si<f^s\l>>-ir^ ,-yxH ^rt^\T"P5/ < "/v^ / JL -i "" Vi—^c-

/ ^



DATE TIME

DATE TIME

CI5 Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:

MATRIXTYPE

OR G

RAB

(G) t

GoiC

ATt

COM

POSI

TE (C

a:UJ

AQUE

OUS

(WA1

tt

^

^

? /

0

8

SOLID

OR

SEM

P

t i VLIQ

UID

(O

IL S

OLVE

NT, .

..)NO

NAQU

EOUS

\

REQUIRED ANALYSIS— '

1

4of-

V

g|

IiJ1^ H.^ 9-,*hf:& {\hWMh

NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMInED

X

A'A *

v\CA

/^TfJJt^^CJr^ /J/'RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) "~~"

X^Xw^H?

[——

^kc^(.{MA

l^kDATE

sJrrir:V

^ '

TIME

TIME

^•^nff

,

» -p if »]

^LViA>c

PAGE OF

STANDARD REPORTDELIVERY ^^

DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY C~)(SURCHARGq ^~^

DATE DUE


REMARKS

for 0:->-s*\«** Le* |;

IX


RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

,'K- :•.-• • LABORATORY USE ONLY

RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY'(SIGNATURE/ / // J

Â**#4fa6rDATE/ . ;-t1ME

(f%/;l 5"

CUSTODY INTACT

NO O

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.

57199/2LABORATORY REMARKS

s

// ORIGINAL - RETURN TO LABORATORY WfTH SAMPLE(S)

MACTECDecember 2, 2002


Subject: 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent Technologies, Inc.MACTEC Project 41-2603-02

Dear Ms. Jones:

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide the enclosed report for the sampling andanalysis of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) inColumbia, South Carolina. The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed ingeneral accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 AnnualGroundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the USEPA in September 2002, allowing for a reductionof sampling locations (Attachment A). Groundwater sampling will be conducted annually for a five-yearperiod following the completion of the remedial action excavation and removal activities in 1999. Thisreport summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event.

The results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event are provided in the enclosed report showing that leadwas not detected in any of the groundwater samples. The analytical results for lead for this samplingevent and the previous events indicate that the lead concentrations in the groundwater samples are belowdrinking water standards.

Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call TauraNichols at (770) 421-3341 or Joe Chikowski at (732) 793-3531.

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

Taura Nichols Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Project Engineer Principal Engineer

Attachmentscc: Joe Chikowski

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.3200 Town Point Drive NW; Suite 100

Kennesaw, GA30144770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486

MACTEC

November 21,2002

Mr. Joe Chikowski25 East Pelican WayOcean Beach, Unit IIILavallette, NJ 08735

Subject: 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project No.: 41-2603-02

Dear Mr. Chikowski:

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide this report for the sampling and analysis

of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells al the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) in Columbia,

South Carolina (Figure 1). The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in general

accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual

Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) in September 2002, allowing for a reduction of sampling locations (Attachment A).Groundwater sampling will be conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the

remedial action (RA) excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the fieldprocedures and the laboratory results of the Fourth Annual Sampling Event.

Regulatory Status

As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with lead concentrations above 400

ppm were excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). Apre-final inspection of the Site by the USEPA and South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control was held in February 1999 and confirmed that the RA activities had been

completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List (NPL) in October 2000.

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.-3200 Town Point Drive NW; Suite 100

Kennesaw, GA30144770-42^3400-Fax: 770-421-3486

Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report November 21, 2002Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02Page 2 of '3


groundwater be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead over a five-year period. The First AnnualGroundwater Monitoring Event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. The Second and

Third Annual Groundwater Monitoring Events, led by Lucent, were completed in October 2000 and

December 2001, respectively. Lead concentrations in all Groundwater samples for the sampling events

were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking water. The results of theFourth Annual Monitoring Event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.

After the third sampling event, Lucent proposed to discontinue the 2002 and 2003 Annual Groundwater

Sampling Events, because lead has not been detected (above drinking water standards) in the groundwatermonitoring wells sampled during the Remedial Action activities. Although this request was denied, EPA

allowed Lucent to reduce the monitoring well locations from twelve to eight during the 2002 AnnualGroundwater Sampling Event, as long as these locations included MW-1S, MW-3S, D, and MW-4S. The

letter from EPA is provided as Attachment A.

Field Procedures

The fieldwork was conducted from October 28, 2002 through October 30, 2002 and included sampling

eight monitoring wells (MW-1S, I, MW-3S, I, D, and MW-4S, I, D) for analysis of total and dissolved

lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring well locations are provided on Figure 2.

All field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to sampling each well. Before

purging each well, the Groundwater depth was measured and documented. All wells were then purgedusing a low-flow purging technique with a peristaltic pump until three well volumes were removed. Afterthe removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled, and the groundwater sample was analyzed bya certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to high turbidity, the first sample from MW-1S(collected on October 28, 2002) was not analyzed and subsequently discarded appropriately. A secondsample, which was analyzed, was collected the following day, after the well had recharged and the

turbidity decreased. Also, MW-1I was only partially purged on October 28, 2002. The last ten gallons

were not purged due to nightfall. Yvonne Jones of the USEPA was notified and concurred that purging of

MW-11 could be continued and sampled the following day.

Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02Page 3 of 3

November 21, 2002

Laboratory Results

The laboratory analytical results and sample date are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical result reports are provided as Attachment B.

Groundwater Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site

Monitoring Well

MW-1SMW-1IMW-3SMW-3IMW-3DMW-4SMW-4IMW-4D

Sample Date

10/29/0210/29/0210/30/0210/30/0210/30/0210/29/0210/29/0210/29/02

Total Lead(mg/1)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

DissolvedLead (mg/1)

NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND

ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit

Lead was not detected in the groundwater samples above the detection limit. These results are consistentwith the results from the previous groundwater sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.

Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call TauraNichols at (770) 421-3341. We appreciate this opportunity to provide continued services to Lucent.

Sincerely,

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.

Taura NicholsProject Engineer

Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal Engineer

FIGURES

G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemop.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 am

COLUMBIAHIGHLAND COUNTY

PALMETTORECYCLING

SOURCE: RlAS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994


RICHLAND COUNTY.SOUTH CAROLINA

LAWENONttRINC AMD CNVWOMWCN1M. SERVICES

SITE LOCATION MAP


1 '

EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSTEEL FRAME SUPERSTRUCTURE

,.__-- / STORACC ARE*»_——*~ \/ (REMOVED DURING RA)

LEGEND

BITtRwlTTCNT DRA»JAC£

• MTIBwtDUTC UOHTORMC "111• SWLUX MMTOBHC ItU.• ABANOONEO WOKaoRtNC wtU

SCAlt IN TEE!

DW - fc VnCSTIGAn^ 0(RtV[D W*STtSOORCt ff BASE UAP: tn/TS REPORT COU rtDCRAl. f S CORP, NOVCUKR 1

REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

t. sc LAW

SITE LAYOUT ANDWELL LOCATION MAP

41-2603-022| I

ATTACHMENT A

UNITED STATES ENVTROKMENTAL PROTECnON AGENCY

REGION 4

61 Forsyth Street, S.W.Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Septembo- 20.2002

Ms. Taura Nicholsreject Coordinator!•' iw Engineering & Environmental Services3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100" enne saw. Ge orgia 30144

Subject 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling EventPalmetto Re cycling Site. Richland County, Columbia. South Carolina

Dear Ms. Nichols:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the results of the groundwatersamples collected during the 1999, 2000 and 2001 Annual Groundwater Sampling Events and Lucent's

'ropoazi to Discontinue the 2002 & 2003 Annud Groundwater Sampling Events at the Palmettoycling Site dated April 29, 2002. At this time, EPA can not grant the discontinuation of the 2002 and

nual Groundwater Sampling Events. However. EPA wiH allow Lucent to reduce the monitoring well; from twelve to eight during the 2002 Annual Groundwater Sampling Event The eight monitoring

well locations shall include MW-1S, MW-3S. MW-3D & MW-4S. If the results of the 2002 Annual'Troundwater SamplingEvent are consistent (below the MCL) with the results ofprevious annual groundwaterampling events. EPA will allow Lucent to further reduce sampling points from eight to four for the 2003

Annual Groundwater Sampling Event. In addition, Lucent has the option to conduct the 2003 Annualjroundwater Sampling Event 6 months upon completion of the 2002 Annual Groundwater SamplingEvent.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, pie as efeelfree to contact me at A 04- 5 6 2- 879 3.iPA looks forward to continuing our cooperative working relationship with Lucent.

Sincerely.

Yvonne O. Jones

. :c: Mihir Mehta. SCDHEC

ATTACHMENT B


S E V E R N. T;R ENT

SERVICES

STL Savannah

LOG NO

LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCT 02Reported: 12 NOV 02





47832-147832-247832-347832-447832-5

MW-4SMW-1SMW-1IMW-4IMW-4D

10-29-02/10:5510-29-02/12:3010-29-02/15:4510-29-02/15:4510-29-02/17:00

PARAMETER 47832-1 47832-2 47832-3 47832-4 47832-5

Kad (6010) , mg/1ilution Factorrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

Lead, (Dissolved) (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.0050.1

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

STL Savannah (s a part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.

S E V E R NTil E NT

SERVICES

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 3517858 -Tax: 912'352 0165 • www.sfrinc.com STL Savannah

LOG NO

LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCT 02Reported: 12 NOV 02





47832-647832-747832-8

MW-3IMW-3SMW-3D

10-30-02/11:3210-30-02/11:4510-30-02/13:30

PARAMETER 47832-6 47832-7 47832-8

Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date^nalysis DatePiatch ID


<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

Swarmed tea part <X Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.

5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • Tel: 912 3547858* fax: 91? 352 0165 • www.stMnc.com

S E V E R N

SERVICES

STL Savannah

LOG NO

LOG NO: S2-47832Received: 31 OCX 02Reported: 12 NOV 02



Code: 141621112REPORT OF .RESULTS Page 3



PARAMETER

Lead (6010) , mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date

^Analysis Datekatch ID


47832-9

<0.00501

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

<0.00501

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

47832-10

105 %1

11.05.0211.06.02

1105K

105 %1

11.01.0211.05.02

1101J

These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SC CERT #98001001

SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates -I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.



STL Savannah te a psrtrf Senem Trent Laboratories, Inc.

REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

STL Savannah

- >enai-'TL Savannah

5102 LaRocne AvenueSavannah, GA 31404

Website: www.stHnc.comPhone: (912) 354-7858Fax: (912) 352-0165

dD Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:

JECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO.

W-3L FP.O. NUMBER

PROJECT LOCATION

(STATICMATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS

PAGE OF

PROJECT MANAGR

CLIENT (SITE) PM

CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT PHONEV)0

CLIENT FAX^71 d-

CLIENT ADDRESS

CLIENT E-MAIL


SAMPLETIME SAMPLE IDENTIHCATION

s V*



DATE DUE


DATE DUE

NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTEDPER SHIPMENT: .

REMARKS

- i 5la mW- I

I5HSt ^ W - M D

X\5Zd

RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RELINUISHED BY: (SIGNATUR DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME cSviR E c v o BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

LABORATORY 'JSE ONLYDATE . •'•: :• TIME CUSTODY INTACT

'-YES'-OCUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL SAVANNAH •-.LOG NO. '.•

LABORATORY REMARKS

notAiMAl _ PFTIIRM TO I B DAP ATORV WITH SBMPIt(S\

MACTEC

December 8, 2003


Subject: 2003 Annual Grounthvater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02

Dear Ms. Jones:

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide the enclosed report for the Fifth Annual

Sampling Event at the Palmetto Recycling Site in Columbia, South Carolina. Groundwater sampling was

conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the remedial action excavation and

removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field procedures and the laboratory results of the

Fifth Annual Sampling Event. The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in

general accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual

Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the USEPA in September 2002, allowing for a reduction

in the number of samples collected.

The results of the Fifth Annual Sampling Event are provided in the enclosed report and show that leadwas not detected above the detection limit of 0.005 mg/1 in the groundwater samples. The analytical

results for lead for this sampling event and the four previous events indicate that the lead concentrationsin the groundwater samples were below the Federal MCLs for drinking water (0.015 mg/1). In accordance

with the Remedial Action Plan for future Site monitoring, the ROD required that groundwater be sampled

and analyzed annually for total lead for five years. Since the lead concentrations in groundwater have

consistently remained below MCLs, Lucent requests the discontinuation of the annual groundwater

sampling events as specified in the ROD. It is our understanding that the USEPA plans on conducting a

Five-Year Review for this site. If you need assistance preparing the Five-Year Review, please let usknow if we may be of assistance.

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive NW, Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144

770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486

Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call Cynthia

Draper or Taura Nichols at (770) 421-3400 of Mactec or Steve Oberkrom of Lucent at (816) 246-7108.

MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.

Frederick K. Marotte, P.E.Principal

.jCynthia DraperProject Manager

Taura NicholsProject Engineer

WITH PERMISSION

Attachments

cc: Steve OberkromMihir Mehta

MACTEC

December 8, 2003

Mr. Steve Oberkrom1067 N.W. Highpoint DriveLee's Summit, Missouri 64081

Subject: 2003 Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South CarolinaLucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project No.: 41-2603-02

Dear Mr. Oberkrom:

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. is pleased to provide this report for the sampling and analysis

of groundwater from the groundwater monitoring wells at the Palmetto Recycling Site (Site) in Columbia,South Carolina (Figure 1). The groundwater sampling and analysis procedures were performed in general

accordance with the Remedial Action Work Plan (Revised June 2, 1999) and the "2002 Annual

Groundwater Sampling Event" letter issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(USEPA) in September 2002, allowing for a reduction of sampling locations. Groundwater sampling was

conducted annually for a five-year period following the completion of the remedial action (RA)

excavation and removal activities in 1999. This report summarizes the field procedures and the

laboratory results of the Fifth Annual Sampling Event.

Regulatory Status

As required by the Record of Decision (ROD, 1995), surface soils with lead concentrations above 400

ppm were excavated from the Site and the area was backfilled (January 1999 through February 1999). A

pre-fmal inspection of the Site by the USEPA and South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control (SCDHEC) was held in February 1999 and confirmed that the RA activities had

been completed. The USEPA removed the Site from the National Priority List (NPL) in October 2000.


groundwater be sampled and analyzed annually for total lead over a five-year period. The First Annual

Groundwater Monitoring Event, led by the EPA, was completed in November 1999. The Second, Third

MACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive NW, Suite 100 • Kennesaw, GA 30144

770-421-3400 • Fax: 770-421-3486

Draft Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis ReportPalmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina, Lucent TechnologiesMACTEC Project 41-2603-02

December 8, 2003Page 2of3

and Fourth Annual Groundwater Monitoring Events, led by Lucent, were completed in October 2000,

December 2001, and October 2002, respectively. Lead concentrations in all groundwater samples for the

sampling events were below the Federal Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking water. The

results of the Fifth Annual Monitoring Event, conducted by Lucent, are provided herein.

Field Procedures

The fieldwork conducted on October 23, 2003 included sampling four monitoring wells (MW-1S, MW-

3S, MW-3D, and MW-4S) for analysis of total and dissolved lead (EPA Method 6010). The monitoring

well locations are provided on Figure 2.

Field equipment was inspected, decontaminated, and calibrated prior to sampling each well. Before

purging of each well, the groundwater depth was measured and documented. Wells were then purgedusing a low-flow purging technique with a peristaltic pump until three well volumes were removed. After

the removal of three well volumes, the wells were sampled, and the groundwater samples were analyzedby a certified laboratory for dissolved and total lead. Due to increased turbidity (>10 NTU) at monitoring

well MW-4S, more than four well volumes were purged in this well. This well was sampled with a

turbidity of 20 NTU. The USEPA and SCDHEC were on-site to supervise the groundwater sampling.

Laboratory Results

The laboratory analytical results and sample data are listed in the following table and the laboratoryanalytical report is provided as Attachment A.

Groundwater Analytical Results for the Palmetto Recycling Site

Monitoring Well

MW-1SMW-3SMW-3DMW-4S

Sample Date

10/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/03

Total Lead(nig/1)NDNDNDND

DissolvedLead (mg/1)NDNDNDND

ND = concentrations not detected above the 0.005 mg/L detection limit.

Draft Annual Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report December 8. 2003Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina, Lucent Technologies Page Jo/3MACTEC Project 41-2603-02

Lead was not detected in the groundwater samples above the detection limit nor was it detected above the

MCL for drinking water (0.015 mg/L). These results are consistent with the results from the previous

groundwater sampling events conducted by the USEPA and Lucent.

Should you have any comments or questions on the groundwater sampling results, please call Taura

Nichols at (770) 421-3341 or Cynthia Draper at (770) 421-3565. We appreciate this opportunity to

provide continued services to Lucent.

Sincerely,

MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC.

Frederick K. Marotte, P.E. Juynthia DraperPrincipal Project Manager

WITH PERMISSIONTaura NicholsProject Engineer

FIGURES

G:\ott\polmetto\remd\rev\sitemop.dwg 4/20/99 8:39 om

COLUMBIARICHLAND COUNTY

PALMETTORECYCLING

SOURCE: RI/FS REPORT. COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORP.. NOVEMBER 1994

REMEDIAL ACTIONALMETTO RECYCLING SITE


LAWENGINEERING AMD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

SITE LOCATION MAP


EXISTING CONCRETE PAD WITHSUEL FRAME SUPIRSTRUCTURF.

LEGEND

——...—— KTCftirtTTCNT DRAINAGE

• HTERUtOATI UOWTOfflHC «LL• SHALLOW MOHTIORMC *tLt

• ABANDONED MONITORING wtu

SCALE IN FEET

I - ttl MVCSnCATWC OCRMO WASTESOURCC Or BASE UAf»; th/TJ RCPORf COW FTOCHAl PAOCRAWS CORP.. NOVCuDCR 1

REMEDIAL ACTION-PALMETTO RECYCLING SITE

rot/Nir. scSITE LAYOUT AND

WELL LOCATION MAP 41-2603-02ICURE

ATTACHMENT A

S E V E R N STLSTL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673

Analytical Report

For: Ms. Tara NicholsMACTEC Engineering and Consulting3200 Town Point Drive, Suite 100Kennesaw, GA 30144

CC:

Order Number:S388609SDG Number:

Client Project ID:Project

Report DateSampled By

Sample Received DateRequisition Number: 41-260302

Purchase Order:

Palmetto Recycling11/07/2003Client10/27/2003


gfulwood@stl-i nc.com

The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for whichaccreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAP requirements are noted inthis report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without thewritten approval of the laboratory.

Page 1 of 6

STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax:(912) 351-3673

Sample SummaryOrder: S388609

Date Received: 10/27/2003Client: MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Project: Palmetto Recycling

G lent Sanple IDEquipment BlankMW-1SW-3SIW-3DMW-3D DUPMW-4S

Lab Sanple ID5388609*15388609*25388609*35388609*45388609*55388609*6

MatrixLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquid

Date Sanpled10/23/2003 14:4010/23/2003 12:3010/23/2003 10:3010/23/2003 14:3010/23/2003 14:3010/23/2003 17:27

Page 2 of 6


K Analytical Data Report

Sanple ID Description

88609-1 Equipment Blank88609-2 IW-1S88609-3 NW-3S88609-4 MW-3D88609-5 MW-3D DUP

Parameter Uhits

Lead (6010)

Lead mg/1Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

Lead, (Dissolved) (6010)

Lead, (Dissolved) mg/1Dilution FactorPrep Date

Ksis DateID

Matrix Date Received Date Sampled SDG#

Lab88609-1

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

Sanple IDs88609-2

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03

88609-3

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<fl.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

10/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/0310/23/03

88609-4

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<0.0050I10/28/0310/29/0310281

14:4012:3010:3014:3014:30

88609-5

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

Page 3 of 6


Sanple ID Description

Analytical Data Report

Matrix Date Received Date Sanpled SDG#

88609-6 MW-4S

Parameter Lhits


Lead, (Dissolved)Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

rng/1

Liquid 10/27/03 10/23/03 17:27Lab Sanple IDs

88609-6

Lead (6010)

LeadDilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

<0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

Page 4 of 6


Analytical Data Report

Sanple ID Description Matrix Date Received Date Sanpled SDG#


Paraneter Lhits

Liquid 10/27/03Liquid 10/27/03

Lab Sanple IDs88609-7 88609-8

Lead (6010)

LeadDilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

101 %110/28/0310/29/0310281


Lead, (Dissolved)Dilution FactorPrep DateAnalysis DateBatch ID

mg/1 <0.0050110/28/0310/29/0310281

101 %110/28/0310/29/0310281

Page 5 of 6

STL Savannah 5102 LaRoche Avenue - Savannah CA 31404 Telephone:(912) 354-7858 Fax: (912) 351-3673

se test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questionsregarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Managerwho signed this test report.SC CERT #98001001

SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.

Page 6 of 6

Serial Number" 19417ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD STL Savannah

5102 LaRoche AvenueSavannah, GA 31404

Website: www.stl-inc.comPhone: (912)354-7858Fax: (912)352-0165

d> Alternate Laboratory Name/LocationPhone:Fax:

PROJECT REFERENCE PROJECT NO. PROJECT UDCATION(STATE)

MATRIXTYPE REQUIRED ANALYSIS PAGE OF

STL (LAB) PROJECT

CUEfiTJSITE) PM

P.O. NUMBER CONTRACT NO.

CLIENT PHONE

CLIENT NAME

LuCCAf

CLIENT FAX

CLIENT ADDRESS

CLIENT E-MAIL

6-COMPANY CONTRACTING THIS WORK (if applicable)

/<rs

SAMPLEDATE TIME

C-/3SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

s


DATE DUE

EXPEDITED REPORTDELIVERY <O(SURCHARGE)

DATE DUE


NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED REMARKS

/" /i>//Vi ^C~

/0(3,V*^XX VX IV

RELIN DAT TIME DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

RECEIVED BY: (SiGNAliORE) DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DAfE RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME

LABORATORY USE ONLYRECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY: CUSTODY INTACT

YES ONO O

CUSTODYSEAL NO.

STL SAVANNAHLOG NO.

LABORATORY REMARKS '

STL824O680 (12/02)

ATTACHMENT G

Copies of Newspaper Notice - Community Involvement And

Interview Documentation Form

FROM SCDHEC EQC LAND/WASTE MANAGEMENTIHa U.S. Environments!Protection Agency (ERA)Region a and the SouinCaralina*Bep»<J<neni olHeoltn and Environmon-tal Conuol (DHEC)announce the com-mencement ol a Hve-Vear Review lor lha Pal-metto Recycling Super-land Sto in Columbia.Richland County, SouthCarolina. f~ivo ' YearRevio«$ are intended 10evaluate me protective-neaa or cleanup actionsU&*n at Superlund eiiee.EPA issued a Record ofDecision (ROD) in March30. 1995. which selected

(MON) 5. 17 '04 11:04/ST. 11:04/NO. 4861492560 P 2

THE STATE-RECORD CO., INC.Columbia, South Carolina

publisher of2004

excavation and

ROD required tho callec-lion ol additional confir-

the absence or presenceof aoll contaminationthrough olf-oilo migra-tion. The ROD also

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINACOUNTY OF RICHLAND

Personally appeared before me, Peggy Lawrence, Advertising Sales SupportManager of THE STATE, and makes oath that the advertisement,

that the remedy wasallociivo ai proieclinghuman health -a/id Uieenvironment. This is thefirst Rve-Year Review forthie Site.

Notice ~ Five Vear review for Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site, Columbia, SC

report will be availablefor public review or copy-ing at tne NortheastRegional Library, 7180Parklane Road. Colum-bia. SC 29223.For further informationpleaaa contactKalsna o. LongFederal and DrycleaningRamsdlailon SectionBureau of Land andWaste Management-SCDHEC8901 Farrow RoadColumbia SC, 29203Ph: (803) 896-4073Fax: (603) 396-4392E-Mail:

was inserted in THE STATE, a daily newspaper of general circulation published inCity of Columbia, State and County aforesaid, in the issues of

April 11,2004

Yvonne O. JonesRemedial Project Manag-erUS Environmental Pro-tection Agency. Region

Waste Management Orvl-slpn61 Forsyth Sireei. TlrtiA^nta. GA 30303 Subscribed and sworn to before mePh: (40i) 562-8793E-Mail:

on this day April 15, 2004

Notary Public

My commission expiresMarch 10.2013 "Errors- the liability of the publisher on account of errors in

or omissions from any advertisement will in no way exceedthe amount of the charge for the space occupied by the item inerror, and then only for the first incorrect insertion. "

INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION FORMThe following is a list of individual interviewed

Yvonne Jones Remedial Project MgrName Title/Position

Mihir Mehta, P.E. Environmental EngrName Title/Position

Name Title/Position

Name Title/Position

Name Title/Position

Name Title/Position

for this five-year review.

EPA-Region 4Organization

SCDHEC-BLWMOrganization

Organization

Organization

Organization

Organization

04-12-2004Date

04-14-2004Date

Date

Date

Date

Date

ATTACHMENT H

Applicable or Relevant & Appropriate Requirements Review

MEMORANDUM

To: Keisha Long, Project Manager Federal and Dry Cleaning Remediation Section Division of Site Assessment and Remediation Bureau of Land and Waste Management

From: Gregory C. Simones, P. G., Risk Assessor Federal Facility Agreement Section Division of Site Assessment and Remediation Bureau of Land and Waste Management

Date: March 29, 2004

Re: Palmetto Recycling Site Columbia, Richland County, South Carolina

Review of Cleanup Levels

The above referenced document has been reviewed as it relates to Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), EPA Region IV Supplemental Guidance to RAGS, and the EPA Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance (Appendix G).

The following comments were generated from the review of this document. If you should have any questions, please contact me at (803) 896-4081.

Per your request (electronic, 03/25/04), I have reviewed the Soil Cleanup Goal for lead listed in the ROD (Table 4, Page 18) against current resources readily available through the Internet. The question, "Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used al the time of the remedy selection still valid?", from the five-year review guidance is used for this portion of the review.

Recommendations Regarding Remedial Levels For Chemicals in Site Soil

1) Lead - Yes, still valid; The remediation level of 400 mg/kg was based on the 1994 OSWER Directive 9355.4-12. The current soil remediation level is unchanged according to the 2001 Final Rule for Lead, "Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead" on page 1211, Section II.F.3.

Therefore, it is recommended that no changes to the reviewed remediation levels be made.

Selected References

1) ATSDR, 2003, 1999 ToxProfile for Lead.

2) Federal Register, January 5, 2001, USEPA, 40 CFR Part 745, Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead; Final Rule, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 1205-1240. http://www.epa.gov/lead/403 final.pdf.

3) USEPA, 2004, IRIS.

4) USEPA, August 2003, Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook, OSWER No. 9285.7-50, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/lead/products/handbook.pdf.

5) USEPA, June 2001, Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance - Appendix G, EPA 540-R-01-007, OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P.

6) USEPA, March 1995, Record of Decision, Palmetto Recycling, Inc., Columbia, SC, EPA/ROD/R04-95/223, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/rods/fulltext/r0495223.pdf.

ATTACHMENT I

List of Documents Reviewed

List of Documents Reviewed

1. "2002 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina."Mactec, December 2, 2002.

2. "2003 Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, South Carolina,"Mactec, December 8, 2003.

3. "Annual Ground-Water Sampling and Analysis Report, Palmetto Recycling Site, Columbia, SouthCarolina," LawGibb Group, February 5, 2002.

4. ATSDR, 2003, 1999 ToxProfile for Lead.

5. "Direct Final Deletion of the Palmetto Recycling Site from the National Priorities List," EPA Region IV, July2000.

6. "EPA Superfund Record of Decision: Palmetto Recycling, Inc, EPA ID: SCD037398120, OU 01,Columbia, SC", March 30, 1995.

7. Federal Register, January 5, 2001, USEPA, 40 CFR Part 745, Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels ofLead; Final Rule, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 1205-1240. http://www.epa.gov/lead/403 final.pdf.

8. "Final Close Out Report for the Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site, Columbia, Richland County, SouthCarolina," EPA Region IV (July 1999).

9. "Final Construction/Remedial Action Report for the Palmetto Recycling Site," LawGibb Group, May 6,1999 (Revised July 13, 1999).

10. "Palmetto Recycling Site Data," EPA Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division, January 18,2000.

11. "Palmetto Recycling Site Data," EPA Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division, May 9, 2000.

12. "Palmetto Superfund Site, Field Survey 11/18/98, Asbestos Survey in Office Building and Sample Results,"LawGibb Group, December 8, 1998.

13. "Transmittal of Draft Remedial Investigation (RI), Palmetto Recycling Superfund Site," CDM-FPC, Inc.,February 1994.

14. USEPA, June 2001, Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance - Appendix G, EPA 540-R-01-007,OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P.

15. USEPA, 2003, List of Drinking Water Contaminants and MCLs, 10 pp.

16. USEPA, August 2003, Superfund Lead-Contaminated Residential Sites Handbook, OSWER No.9285.7-50, http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/leadyproducts/handbook.pdf.

17. USEPA, 2004, IRIS.

ATTACHMENT J

Site Inspection Check Form and Photographs

OSWKRNo. 9355.7-03B-P

Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checklist

t

I. SITE INFORMATION

Site name: Palmetto Recycling

Location and Region: Columbia, SC; Region 4

Agency, office, or company leading the five-yearreview: SCDHEC

Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)D Landfill cover/containment DD Access controls DD Institutional controls D0 Groundwatcr pump and treatment0 Surface water collection and treatmentQDOther Excavation/Soil cover

Date of inspection: 04/14/2004

EPA ID: SCD037398120

Weather/temperature: 62°; Partly

Monitored natural attenuationGroundwater containmentVertical barrier walls

cloudy

Attachments: D Inspection team roster attached

II. INTERVIEWS

1 . O&M site manager Yvonne Jones

D Site map attached

(Check all that apply)

RPMName Title

Interviewed D at site D at office DDby phone Phone no. 404-562-8793_Problems, suggestions: D Report attached

04/12/2004Date

2. O&M staffName

Interviewed D at site D at office D by phone PhoneProblems, suggestions: D Report attached

Title Dateno.

tG-l

OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P

t

Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal offices, emergency responseoffice, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office, recorder ofdeeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.

Agency _SCDHEC___Contact _Keisha D. Long_

NameEnvironmental Engr Assoc

Title Dale803-896-4073

Phone no.Problems; suggestions; 0 Report attached

Agency _SCDHEC______Contact _Mihir Mehta, P.E._

NameEnvironmental Engr

Title04/12/2004 803-896-4088

Date Phone no.Problems; suggestions; D Report attached

Agency __________________Contact __________________

NameProblems; suggestions; D Report attached

Title Date Phone no.

Agency ____________________Contact __________________

NameProblems; suggestions; D Report attached

Title Date Phone no.

Other interviews (optional) D Report attached.

G-2

t OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P

m. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS & RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

O&M DocumentsD O&M manual DD As-built drawingsD Maintenance logsRemarks

Readily available D Up toD Readily availableD Readily available

Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan D Readily availableD Contingency plan/emergency response plan D Readily availableRemarks

O&M and OSHA Training Records D Readily availableRemarks

Permits and Service AgreementsD Air discharge permitD Effluent dischargeD Waste disposal, POTW DD Other permitsRemarks

Gas Generation Records DRemarks

Settlement Monument RecordsRemarks

Groundwater Monitoring RecordsRemarks

Leachate Extraction RecordsRemarks

Discharge Compliance RecordsD A i rD Water (effluent)Remarks

Daily Access/Security LogsRemarks

D Readily availableD Readily available

Readily available D Up toD Readilv available

Readily available D Up to

D Readily available

D Readily available

D Readily available

D Readily availableD Readily available

D Readily available

date DN/AD Up to daleD Up to date

D Up to dateD Up to date

D Up to date


date DN/AD Up to date

date DN/A

D Up to date

DDUp to date

D Up to date


D Up to date

DN/ADN/A

DN/ADN/A

DN/A

DN/ADN/ADN/A

DN/A

DN/A

DN/A

DN/ADN/A

DN/A

G-3

OSWERNo. 9355.7-03B-P

t

IV. O&M COSTS

1. O&M OrganizationD State in-house 0 Contractor for StateDDPRP in-house D Contractor for PRPD Federal Facility in-houseD Contractor for Federal FacilityD Other

2. O&M Cost RecordsD Readily available D Up to dateD Funding mechanism/agreement in placeOriginal O&M cost estimate D Breakdown attached

Total annual cost by year for review period if available

From To D Breakdown attached

3.

A.

1.

B.

1.

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To

Date DateFrom To

Date Date

Unanticipated or Unusually HighDescribe costs and reasons:

V. ACCESS AND INSTI'

Fencing

Total costD Breakdown attached




Total cost

O&M Costs During Review Period

rUTIONAL CONTROLS D Applicable DD N/A

Fencing damaged D Location shown on site map D Gates secured DN/ARemarks

Other Access Restrictions

Signs and other security measuresRemarks

D Location shown on site map DN/A

G-4

t OSWERNo. 9355.7-03 fi-P

c.1.

2.

D.

1.

2.

3.

Institutional Controls (ICs)

Implementation and enforcementSite conditions imply ICs not properly implemented D Yes D NoSite conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced D Yes D No

Tvpe of monitoring (e.g.. self-reporting, drive bv")FrequencvResponsible party/agcncvContact

Name Title Date

Reporting is up-to-date D Yes D NoReports are verified by the lead agency D Yes D No

Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met D Yes 0 NoViolations have been reported D Yes D NoOther problems or suggestions: D Report attached

Adequacy D ICs are adequate D ICs are inadequateRemarks

General

Vandalism/trespassing D Location shown on site map DNo vandalism evidentRemarks

Land use changes on site DN/ARemarks

Land use changes off site DN/ARemarks

DN/ADN/A

Phone no.

DN/ADN/ADN/ADN/A

DN/A

VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

A.

1.

Roads D Applicable D N/A

Roads damaged D Location shown on site map DRoads adequate D N/ARemarks

G-5

OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P

B. Other Site Conditions

Remarks

VII. LANDFILL COVERS D Applicable DN/A

VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS D Applicable DN/A

A.

IX. GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES DApplicable DN/AGrouhdwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines D Applicable DN/A

1 . Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and ElectricalD Good condition D All required wells properly operating D Needs Maintenance D N/ARemarks

2.

3.

B.

1.

2.

3.

Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other AppurtenancesD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Spare Parts and EquipmentD Readily available D Good condition D Requires upgrade 0 Needs toRemarks

be provided

Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines D Applicable DN/A

Collection Structures, Pumps, and ElectricalD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other AppurtenancesD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Spare Parts and EquipmentD Readily available D Good condition D Requires upgrade 0 Needs toRemarks

be provided

tG-6

OSWER No. 9355.7-03K-P

t

c.1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

D.1.

2.

Treatment System D Applicable DN/A

Treatment Train (Check components that apply)D Metals removal D Oil/water separation D BioremediationD Air stripping D Carbon adsorbersD FiltersD Additive (e.g.. chelation agent. flocculcnOD OthersD Good condition D Needs MaintenanceD Sampling ports properly marked and functionalD Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to dateD Equipment properly identifiedD Quantity of groundwater treated annuallyD Quantity of surface water treated annuallyRemarks

Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)D N/A D Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels0 N/A D Good condition D Proper secondary containment D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Discharge Structure and AppurtenancesD N/A D Good condition D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Treatment Building(s)D N/A D Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) D Needs repairD Chemicals and equipment properly storedRemarks

Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)D Properly secured/locked D Functioning D Routinely sampled D GoodD All required wells located D Needs MaintenanceRemarks

Monitoring DataMonitoring DataDls routinely submitted on time D Is of acceptable qualityMonitoring data suggests: No plume onsiteD Groundwater plume is effectively contained D Contaminant concentrations

conditionDN/A

are declining

G-7

OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P

D. Monitored Natural Attenuation

Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)D Properly secured/locked DFunctioningDRoutinely sampled DGood conditionDAII required wells located D Needs Maintenance D N/ARemarks________________________________________________

X. OTHER REMEDIES

If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describingthe physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soilvapor extraction.

XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS

A. Implementation of the Remedy

The cleanup goals established in the Record of Decision for soil have been met. Thelong-term protectiveness of the remedial action (excavation/soil cover) was verified bycontinued monitoring of groundwater to confirm that the remedy was effective atprotecting human health and the environment. Current groundwater monitoringindicates that the groundwater concentrations for lead are below the health-based levelof 15 parts per billion (ppb).

B. Adequacy of O&MCurrent groundwater monitoring indicates that the groundwater concentrations for leadare below the health-based level of 15 parts per billion (ppb).

C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy ProblemsNot Applicable

D. Opportunities for OptimizationNot Applicable

G-8

Shell of the Palmetto Recycling, Inc. building. Koon Store Road is to the left

Residence across the street (Koon Store Road) from the Site

Monitoring wells at the Site

Five-Year Review Report For The Palmetto Recycling ... · Due date: 02/03/2004. Five-Year Review...

Documents

Transcript of Five-Year Review Report For The Palmetto Recycling ... · Due date: 02/03/2004. Five-Year Review...