Five Mistakes That Damage the Effectiveness of Shared Services and How to Avoid Them
-
Upload
stephen-g-lynch -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Five Mistakes That Damage the Effectiveness of Shared Services and How to Avoid Them
-
8/7/2019 Five Mistakes That Damage the Effectiveness of Shared Services and How to Avoid Them
1/2
FIVE MISTAKES THATDAMAGE THE EFFECTIVENESSOF SHARED SERVICESAND HOW TO AVOID THEM
Global Finance 360 | Copyright 2010 | All Rights Reserved 1
GlobalFinance360
Leading companies have leveraged captive shared service centers to drive processstandardization, improve service delivery and dramatically reduce costs. Yet manycompanies continue to struggle with the role of a captive service organization in theiroverall delivery strategy. Despite upbeat predictions from their business case, somecompanies have failed to realize the anticipated benefits from their Shared ServiceOrganization. How is it that companies fail to realize the benefits of Shared Servicesthat many other companies have successfully realized? While every organization isdifferent, common traits have been identified among companies that are not achievingthe goals of their captive Shared Service Organization.
1. Shared Services is not evaluated as part of a comprehensivedelivery strategy
A Shared Service Organization developed apart from a comprehensive deliverystrategy will not effectively support the companys corporate strategy. High performingcompanies focus on building a comprehensive delivery strategy that incorporates bothcaptive and 3
rdparty suppliers. An organizations service delivery strategy should
support the overall corporate strategy and includes a consideration of the companysexisting and planned business lines and geographic presence. It also includes anobjective analysis of the supplier-side capabilities from both the captive serviceorganization and 3
rdparty service providers. Another consideration is the global
distribution of support services including an analysis of onshore and offshore deliveryoptions.
When the decision to move to Shared Services is made in conjunction with acomprehensive delivery strategy, rational decisions can be made around theplacement and delivery of services.
2. The vision for Shared Services is not clear and compelling
Once a comprehensive strategy has been developed and the role of the SharedService Organization in that strategy has been defined, it is essential to craft the visionof the captive service organization. Too many companies move directly into theexecution phase without clearly defining the vision around Shared Services. A clearand compelling vision will paint a picture of the future, provide a high-level direction forchange and create a reason for people to engage in behavior that will enable theachievement of that vision.
An engaging Shared Service vision is one that is ultimately desirable for the companyand its major stakeholder groups, even if it involves short-term sacrifice. The visionshould be realistic and concrete enough that people understand the goals of SharedServices. The vision should be easily communicated to and understood by disparatestakeholder groups.
The creation of a
Shared Service
Organization is much
more than the
consolidation of
processes. It
involves creating a
distinct organization
that is committed to
creating value in the
company by
providing support
functions more
effectively and
efficiently than if
they were embedded
in the business
units. Avoiding
these 5 common
mistakes will enable
the anticipated value
creation.
Author: Stephen G. Lyn
-
8/7/2019 Five Mistakes That Damage the Effectiveness of Shared Services and How to Avoid Them
2/2
Global Finance 360 | Copyright 2010 | All Rights Reserved 2
About Global Finance 360
Global Finance 360 covers the
world of corporate finance and
accounting and how these
activities are impacted by
globalization. Focus areas
include Finance Delivery
Strategy, Shared Services,Business Process Outsourcing,
Process Improvement and
Organizational Design.
Global Finance 360 is run by
Steve Lynch. Mr. Lynch is a
Principal in the Finance
Transformation practice of a
global consulting company. He
is responsible for the marketing,
sales and delivery of Finance
Transformation services in North
America and serves as a key
liaison for his companys global
Finance practice. He brings
more than 15 years of
experience advising global
companies on their service
delivery strategies and has
served over 60 clients in a
variety of industries including
consumer product and industrial
manufacturing, aerospace &
defense, transportation,
technology, entertainment and
financial services. He has also
served as a Controller in private
industry and as an auditor inpublic accounting.
Mr. Lynch is an active content
contributor on the topics of
FinanceTransformation andglobalization and has presented
at various forums including the
IQPC Shared Services &
Outsourcing conference. He can
be found on the web at
www.globalfinance360.com.
Contact Information:
Steve Lynch
Toll-free: +1.800.216.2512
Office: +1.719.481.2599
1042 W. Baptist Road
Suite 194
Colorado Springs, CO 80921
www.globalfinance360.com
3. Processes are consolidated into Shared Services without therequired transformation
Companies sometimes take poorly performing processes from the business units andmove them to the Shared Service Organization without engaging in the transformationnecessary to standardize and optimize the processes. Without this transformation,those poorly performing processes will continue to be a problem for the company byproviding substandard service to the business units at a cost far above best-in-class.
In order to fulfill the vision of the Shared Service Organization, disparate processesfrom multiple business units and geographies must be reengineered to standardizethose processes, incorporate best-in-class practices and technologies, and reduce theoverall cost of delivering those services.
4. Comprehensive change management is not a priority
Creating and sustaining change in any organization is difficult. Too many companiesfocus on the mechanics of creating a Shared Service Organization with little thought tothe human element. Companies that have successfully reaped the benefits of SharedServices understand that a comprehensive and consistent change managementprogram is essential to the successful deployment of Shared Services.
An important component of change management is identifying and engaging significanstakeholders early in the process. When discussing Shared Services, the leaders ofthe companys business units must be included. Without engaging the business unitsin the change effort, the move to Shared Services will be seen as little more than thecentralization of support services with only token input from the business units that willultimately be the customers of the Shared Service Organization.
5. A strong governance structure is not implemented
The creation of a Shared Service Organization is much more than the consolidation ofprocesses. It involves creating a distinct organization that is committed to creatingvalue in the company by providing support functions more effectively and efficientlythan if they were embedded in the business units. For this to be accomplished, the
Shared Service Organization must be guided by a governance structure that providesthe oversight and control that enables Shared Services to achieve its vision. The topgoverning body for Shared Services should include representatives from the majorbusiness units and IT as well as representatives from the major support functions suchas Finance, HR and Procurement.
Conclusion
A Shared Service Organization that avoids these five mistakes will be far betterpositioned to achieve the stated vision and obtain the financial and intangible benefitsthat accrue to those companies that successfully implement Shared Services. Acomprehensive delivery strategy and a clear and compelling vision set the stage.Business transformation enables the standardization and optimization of processes,
policies and technology that drives performance. Comprehensive changemanagement ensures success and embeds lasting change. Strong governanceenables continued value creation.