Fitting the HiRes Data
description
Transcript of Fitting the HiRes Data
Fitting the HiRes DataFitting the HiRes Data
Douglas BergmanDouglas BergmanRutgers UniversityRutgers University
28 April 200528 April 2005
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
The HiRes DataThe HiRes Data• Here’s the HiRes spectraHere’s the HiRes spectra
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
The HiRes DataThe HiRes Data• Here’s the HiRes spectraHere’s the HiRes spectra
– Actually fit to numbers of Actually fit to numbers of events using calculated events using calculated apertureaperture
– Use binned maximum Use binned maximum likelihood methodlikelihood method
– Two empty bins for each of Two empty bins for each of HiRes-I and HiRes-IIHiRes-I and HiRes-II
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
2 = 114/37
= -3.12(1)
FeaturesFeatures• What are the features of What are the features of
the spectrum?the spectrum?– Fit to broken power lawFit to broken power law– No BP, bad fitNo BP, bad fit
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
2 = 46.0/35
1= -3.31(3)
2= -2.91(3)log10E = 18.45(2)
FeaturesFeatures• What are the features of What are the features of
the spectrum?the spectrum?– Fit to broken power lawFit to broken power law– No BP, bad fitNo BP, bad fit– 1 BP, Ankle1 BP, Ankle
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
2 = 30.1/33
1= -3.32(4)
2= -2.86(4)log10E12 = 18.47(6)
3= -5(1)log10E23 = 19.79(9)
FeaturesFeatures• What are the features of What are the features of
the spectrum?the spectrum?– Fit to broken power lawFit to broken power law– No BP, bad fitNo BP, bad fit– 1 BP, Ankle1 BP, Ankle– 2 BP, HE suppression2 BP, HE suppression
• 11 events above break11 events above break• Expect 28 with red lineExpect 28 with red line• Poisson prob. 2.4x10Poisson prob. 2.4x10-4-4
• Is the HE suppression the Is the HE suppression the GZK?GZK?
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Integral SpectraIntegral Spectra• One measure of the energy One measure of the energy
of the suppression is Eof the suppression is E½½ – Due to BerezinskyDue to Berezinsky– Where integral flux is half of Where integral flux is half of
expected with no expected with no suppressionsuppression
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Integral SpectraIntegral Spectra• One measure of the energy One measure of the energy
of the suppression is Eof the suppression is E½½ – Due to BerezinskyDue to Berezinsky– Where integral flux is half of Where integral flux is half of
expected with no expected with no suppressionsuppression
• Use red line extension of Use red line extension of broken power law as no-broken power law as no-suppression expectationsuppression expectation
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Integral SpectraIntegral Spectra• One measure of the energy One measure of the energy
of the suppression is Eof the suppression is E½½ – Due to BerezinskyDue to Berezinsky– Where integral flux is half of Where integral flux is half of
expected with no expected with no suppressionsuppression
• Use red line extension of Use red line extension of broken power law as no-broken power law as no-suppression expectationsuppression expectation– Find logFind log1010EE½½ = 19.77 = 19.77+0.15+0.15
-0.06-0.06
– Berezinsky Berezinsky et al,et al, predict predict loglog1010EE½½ = 19.72 for the GZK = 19.72 for the GZK
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
The HiRes Data (again)The HiRes Data (again)• Want to fit the HiRes Want to fit the HiRes
spectra…spectra…
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
The HiRes Data (again)The HiRes Data (again)• Want to fit the HiRes Want to fit the HiRes
spectra…spectra…– And also take into account And also take into account
the HiRes composition the HiRes composition measurementsmeasurements
QGSJet Iron
QGSJet Iron
QGSJet protons
QGSJet protons
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
The HiRes Data (again)The HiRes Data (again)• Want to fit the HiRes Want to fit the HiRes
spectra…spectra…– And also take into account And also take into account
the HiRes composition the HiRes composition measurementsmeasurements
• Make one simplifying Make one simplifying assumption:assumption:– Composition determines Composition determines
originorigin• Iron is GalacticIron is Galactic• Protons are ExtragalacticProtons are Extragalactic
– Use fit to compositionUse fit to composition• But assume all protons at But assume all protons at
100 EeV100 EeV– Fit spectrum by varying Fit spectrum by varying
extragalactic model, galactic extragalactic model, galactic spectrum determined from spectrum determined from this “Toy Model” assumptionthis “Toy Model” assumption
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)• Assume uniform sources Assume uniform sources
of extragalactic protonsof extragalactic protons– Identical spectral slope Identical spectral slope – Uniform luminosity density Uniform luminosity density
at any epochat any epoch– Luminosity density can vary Luminosity density can vary
as (1+as (1+zz))mm
• Protons lose energyProtons lose energy– Average energy loss rate Average energy loss rate
from Berezinsky from Berezinsky et alet al
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)• Assume uniform sources Assume uniform sources
of extragalactic protonsof extragalactic protons– Identical spectral slope Identical spectral slope – Uniform luminosity density Uniform luminosity density
at any epochat any epoch– Luminosity density can vary Luminosity density can vary
as (1+as (1+zz))mm
• Protons lose energyProtons lose energy– Average energy loss rate Average energy loss rate
from Berezinsky from Berezinsky et alet al– Pion production causes Pion production causes
proton to loose a large proton to loose a large fraction of its energyfraction of its energy
• Have to use MC for this Have to use MC for this processprocess
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.0004Z=0.0004
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.001Z=0.001
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.004Z=0.004
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.01Z=0.01
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.04Z=0.04
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.1Z=0.1
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=0.4Z=0.4
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=1Z=1
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)Z=4Z=4
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)• All the shells togetherAll the shells together
– = 2.4= 2.4– mm = 2.5 = 2.5
• Each energy dominated by Each energy dominated by different range in different range in zz– Given energy is somewhat Given energy is somewhat
flat in flat in zz up to maximum up to maximum– Allows one to do cosmologyAllows one to do cosmology
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)• All the shells togetherAll the shells together
– = 2.4= 2.4– mm = 2.5 = 2.5
• Each energy dominated by Each energy dominated by different range in different range in zz– Given energy is somewhat Given energy is somewhat
flat in flat in zz up to maximum up to maximum– Allows one to do cosmologyAllows one to do cosmology
• Sum of shells gives Sum of shells gives spectrum for fittingspectrum for fitting
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Uniform Source Model (XG)Uniform Source Model (XG)• All the shells togetherAll the shells together
– = 2.4= 2.4– mm = 2.5 = 2.5
• Each energy dominated by Each energy dominated by different range in different range in zz– Given energy is somewhat Given energy is somewhat
flat in flat in zz up to maximum up to maximum– Allows one to do cosmologyAllows one to do cosmology
• Sum of shells gives Sum of shells gives spectrum for fittingspectrum for fitting
• Actually need finer set of Actually need finer set of shellsshells
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Best USM Fit to HiResBest USM Fit to HiRes• Fit USM varying Fit USM varying mm and and
– = 2.38= 2.38– mm = 2.55 = 2.55– Galactic spectrum falls Galactic spectrum falls
steeply above 100 PeVsteeply above 100 PeV
Galactic
Extragalactic
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Best USM Fit to HiResBest USM Fit to HiRes• Fit USM varying Fit USM varying mm and and
– = 2.38= 2.38– mm = 2.55 = 2.55– Galactic spectrum falls Galactic spectrum falls
steeply above 100 PeVsteeply above 100 PeV• Statistical UncertaintyStatistical Uncertainty
– = 0.035= 0.035– mm = 0.25 = 0.25
2 Contours for Spectrum Fit
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Best USM Fit to HiResBest USM Fit to HiRes2 Contours for Spectrum Fit• Fit USM varying Fit USM varying mm and and
– = 2.38= 2.38– mm = 2.55 = 2.55– Galactic spectrum falls Galactic spectrum falls
steeply above 100 PeVsteeply above 100 PeV• Statistical UncertaintyStatistical Uncertainty
– = 0.035= 0.035– mm = 0.25 = 0.25
• Systematic UncertaintySystematic Uncertainty– = 0.03= 0.03– mm = 0.3 = 0.3
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Where the Fit Works Well…Where the Fit Works Well…• The fit works best in the The fit works best in the
Ankle regionAnkle region– Understand the Ankle as Understand the Ankle as
coming from coming from ee++ee-- pair pair production energy lossesproduction energy losses
– Spectral slope (Spectral slope () mostly ) mostly determined by rise from determined by rise from Ankle (HiRes-I dominates)Ankle (HiRes-I dominates)
– Evolution (Evolution (mm) determined by ) determined by fall into Ankle (HiRes-II fall into Ankle (HiRes-II dominates)dominates)
Galactic
Extragalactic
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
……and Where it Doesn’tand Where it Doesn’t• GZK regionGZK region
– Fit is above the dataFit is above the data– Perhaps…Perhaps…
• Some sources have Some sources have EEmaxmax of of order GZK thresholdorder GZK threshold
• 22ndnd Knee Region Knee Region– There isn’t oneThere isn’t one– Perhaps…Perhaps…
• The input spectral slope The input spectral slope changes?changes?
• Evolution of sources Evolution of sources changes?changes?
Galactic
Extragalactic
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Spectrum OverviewSpectrum Overview
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
Spectrum OverviewSpectrum Overview
28 April 200528 April 2005 Aspen WorkshopAspen Workshop
ConclusionConclusion• HiRes has measured the UHECR spectrum from 10HiRes has measured the UHECR spectrum from 1017.217.2 eV to just above 10 eV to just above 102020
eVeV• HiRes Prototype/MIA and HiRes Stereo have measured the <HiRes Prototype/MIA and HiRes Stereo have measured the <XXmaxmax> of > of
UHECR from 10UHECR from 1016.916.9 eV to 10 eV to 1019.419.4 eV eV• Broken power law fit to spectrum finds the Ankle at 10Broken power law fit to spectrum finds the Ankle at 1018.518.5 eV and evidence eV and evidence
for a suppression at 10for a suppression at 1019.819.8 eV eV• HE suppression found consistent with being the GZK by examining integral HE suppression found consistent with being the GZK by examining integral
spectrumspectrum• We have used the composition measurements to separate the galactic and We have used the composition measurements to separate the galactic and
extragalactic components of the spectrum and fit the extragalactic extragalactic components of the spectrum and fit the extragalactic component to a uniform source model with variable evolution and with component to a uniform source model with variable evolution and with proton energy lossesproton energy losses