Fish Centers/District

Red indicates high numbersof centers while Blue indicateslow numbers of centers

Number of Permanent Fishermen/Province

livestock Per Thousand Families

Red: Less than 100Yellow: 100-500Green: 500-1000Pink: > 1000

Other Sources Of Income:

Petty trading

Is one of the more important sources of income for poorfamilies, with on average 34% of income being obtainedfrom this source. This category includes sale ofmanufactured goods (cigarettes, soap, fuel etc.) locallyproduced alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks and crafts.

Ganho-ganho

Is a form of exchange of labour for food or cash. Thisexchange normally takes place between kin or neighbours.On average poor households obtain 18% of their cashincome from ganho-ganho. Ganho-ganho as a source ofincome is most important in Cabo Delgado, Tete andMaputo Provinces. In these areas ganho-ganho is alsoimportant as a source of food. Ganho-ganho is normallyused for agricultural tasks, therefore if there is a reductionin agricultural activities (e.g. through drought) then incomefrom ganho-ganho would also be reduced. Thus thedistricts in the south and Tete would be most affected inthis way.

Sale of food and or cash crops

Is not an important source of income for poor families. Onaverage 14% of income is received from this source. Aswould be expected, the areas with greater productivepotential are the ones where poor families obtain incomefrom the sale of crops.

Firewood collection and charcoal production

Poor households receive 9% of their income from Firewoodand charcoal sales are more important for poor familiesclose to cities: Maputo, Pemba and Tete; the BeiraCorridor; and in districts bordering neighbouring countries:e.g. Mutarara, and Mechanelas. While this source ofincome may not be affected by drought, an increaseddependence on it (through existing families intensifying theactivity or additional families engaging in the activity)could provoke environmental problems.

Remittance and other sources of transfer

Include gifts, donations, begging, and remittances. ItRepresents 7% of income for poor households. It isinteresting to note that this data from the profiles appears toindicate that even in the southern parts of the country whichhistorically been involved in migrant labour; this sourcedoes not represent more than 25% of income for poorfamilies. This may reflect lower participation in migrantlabour practices among poorer households.

Employment

On average 6% of income is obtained from formalemployment. Even in districts close to cities, poor familiesappear not to rely heavily on this source.

Food deficit districts (20)< 6 months of food availability

• Market access•Dependancy on markets•Livestock offtake•Fisheries/other income•Production disparity within district

Identification of twenty food insecure districts;and the causes of vulnerability

VULNERABILITY

Critical Nutrition Status

@@

@

@

@

@

@

@

Kebemer

Bignona Sedihou Kolda

Kedougou

Tambacounda

Oussouye

DAKAR

Vulnerability Patterns

High drought risk but experienced coping mechanisms

Poor but food secure

High socio-economic insecurity

Market risk and high socio-economic insecurity

High risks and relatively high socio-economic insecurityF e r l o

C a s a m a n c e

G r o u n d n u t

B a s i n

S e n e g a l

O r i e n t a l

Vulnerability Assessment, as in SenegalVulnerability Assessment, as in Senegal

Nomadic Pastoralists Spring/Summer Movements

Food Economy Zones of

Afghanistan

Afghanistan - Characterising Afghanistan - Characterising Food Security Strategies Food Security Strategies

VulnerabilityLevels in Haiti

Contingency Planning & disaster Mitigation

Information to highlight regions and population groups at risk to specific hazards including detailed profiles

Indigenous coping/recovery capacities,

Available institutional and logistics resources, access, damageassessment

basis for prioritizing investments for improved emergency prevention, mitigation, and response capabilities.

•Early Warning

•Vulnerability Analysis

•Needs Assessment

•Contingency Planning

•Impact assessment

•Support for FFW

The initial area for analysis is in the South of country as indicated on this map. Eight Weredas are expected to be covered by this study.

People living within10 Kms of Current 4hotspots - Ethiopia -Eritrea border430,000Within 4 hot spots167,000

2488 Impact Assessment

Combination of Food Insecurity, Population Pressure and Soil Risk Areas

The stars representour current food for

work sites.

Soil Risk in combination with;Red: Vulnerability and Population pressureYellow: VulnerabilityBlue: Population pressure(129 Woredas out 430)

3 Potential Disasters• Drought Cyclone Locust

Yellow districts have 50-75% area affected and red districts have >75% affected

drought-prone level district name 1993pop 94rice 94maizeRED BEKILY 99194 15200 2910RED BETROKA 107150 23300 410RED IHOSY 80750 21000 250

YELLOW AMBALAVAO 143947 35020 1320YELLOW AMBANJA 100465 19800 250YELLOW AMBATOMAINTY 15356 5410 235YELLOW AMBOASARY-ATSIMO 120248 8800 1285YELLOW AMBOHIDRATRIMO 185146 22210 1160YELLOW AMBOVOMBE-ANDROY 146078 700 3200YELLOW AMPANIHY 163210 200 2025YELLOW ANJOZOROBE 114312 31780 1695YELLOW ANKAZOABO-ATSIMO 38122 7700 720YELLOW BELOHA 50652 0 295YELLOW BENENITRA 20923 2900 0YELLOW BETIOKY-ATSIMO 131342 19100 750YELLOW FENOARIVO-AFOVOANY 64779 19030 385YELLOW IKALAMAVONY 42536 19500 510YELLOW KANDREHO 9360 940 270YELLOW MANJA 44946 4100 850YELLOW SAKARAHA 53960 8800 440YELLOW TANA-AV-AT 1103304 60840 1655YELLOW TSHIOMBE 51596 0 4735

drought areas 1784072 326330 25350nation 12238917 2357000 155000

% in drought zones 15% 14% 16%

Response Planning, in MadagascarResponse Planning, in Madagascar