First-year teacher education students’ reflections and interpretations about sustainable...
Transcript of First-year teacher education students’ reflections and interpretations about sustainable...
FIRST-YEAR TEACHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ REFLECTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS ABOUT
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENHANCING LEARNING PRACTICES
Blended learning- Technology-Enhanced Teaching and Learning Environments- project
Anu Liljeström , Henriikka Vartiainen, Petteri Vanninen, Jorma Enkenberg & Sinikka Pöllänen
University of Eastern Finland, Philosophical Faculty, School of Applied Educational Science and Teacher Education
Savonlinna Campus
Forest as Learning Environment- project
Background of the study
• The complex and multi-disciplinary nature of sustainable development :
• Local <-> Global
• Formal <-> Informal
• Transdisciplinarity (UNESCO, 2005; 2009)
• Skills for the 21st century(Binkley et al., 2011; NETP, 2010)
Research aims
• To create baseline knowledge about the use of out-of-school environments, expertise and technology in Finnish education
• To find out how the first year teacher education students intent to use the pillars of the learning ecosystem as part of their future teaching
Information resources
School
for organizing, constructing,
and presenting data
Community resources
for making
Extended school
Technological resources
Non-digital Digital
Real-life objects
for searching information
for collaboration
for collecting information
for reflecting on and evaluating knowledge and
information
Conceptual model for learning ecosystem
Phenomena related to SD
Research questions
1. How do first-year teacher education studentsa) perceive sustainable development?b) see the role of sustainability and forests in the future in work?
2. How much do first-year teacher education students have had experiences in their past education about learning in diverse
a) physical (nature and culture),
b) social (extended communities), and
c) technological environments?
3. Does the intent work as a teacher depend on the students’ experiences and the relationship to the forest?
Participants
• 121 First-year teacher education students
• Class teacher education (N= 46)
• Kindergarten teacher education ( N=41)
• Home economics teacher education ( N=22)
• Textile teacher education (N=11)
• 18-41 years, Md= 20 years, 82 % female
Quantitative data, close –ended items(five-point Likert scale):
n=45 Alpha .914
Past education and future work as a teacher
Descriptive statistical methodsKruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance
n=35 Alpha .910
Use of technology and tools Descriptive statistical methods
n=6 Alpha .749
Data collection methods and analysis
Qualitative data,open-ended items.
SD and forest
Deductive (Brown et al.,
1987) and inductive content analysis
Data
n=3
Items ReliabilityAnalysis
61.2
.8 0
24.8
11.6.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
Ecological Social Economic Combination Other
Perceptions of sustainable development
Pe
rce
nt
(missing 1,6 %)
How do first-year teacher students of education perceive sustainable development?
How do first-year teacher education students see the role of sustainability and forests in the future in work as a teacher?
17.9
25.6
1.7
17.1
37.6
0.10
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
SD and future teaching
As teaching content As teaching method
As learning environment As combination
Value itself Other
10.58.5
42.5
34.9
22.6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Forest and SD
As teaching content As enrichment of teaching
As learning environment As mediator
Other
Nev
er
Seld
om
Oft
en
Ver
y o
ften
In kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5
In primary school 1 2 3 4 5
In secondary school 1 2 3 4 5
In high school 1 2 3 4 5
Future 1 2 3 4 5
UsingEffectiveness of the usingLearning projects situated outside
A f
ew t
imes
Research question 2 a: Learning outside school in forest and nature environments
n = 15, (alpha .854), N=121, item medians
Research question 2 a: Participating in learning projects that integrate school subjects
n = 5, (alpha .839), N=121, item medians
Nev
er
Seld
om
Oft
en
Ver
y o
ften
In kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5
In primary school 1 2 3 4 5
In secondary school 1 2 3 4 5
In high school 1 2 3 4 5
Future 1 2 3 4 5A
few
tim
es
Visits to expert communitiesExperts’ visits to the schools
In kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5
In primary school 1 2 3 4 5
In secondary school 1 2 3 4 5
In high school 1 2 3 4 5
Future 1 2 3 4 5
Nev
er
Seld
om
Oft
en
Ver
y o
ften
A f
ew t
imes
Research question 2 b: Collaboration with expert communities
n = 10, (alpha .866), N=121, item medians
In kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5
In primary school 1 2 3 4 5
In secondary school 1 2 3 4 5
In high school 1 2 3 4 5
Future 1 2 3 4 5
Nev
er
Seld
om
Oft
en
Ver
y o
ften
A f
ew t
imes
Research question 2 c: Using ICT for collaboration with expert communities
n = 5, (alpha .805), N=121, item medians
Research question 2 c: Frequencies of the use of technology and tools
n=6, M = 2.58, (alpha = .749) N=121, item medians
Ne
ver
(1)
Seld
om
(2
)
A f
ew
tim
es
(3)
Oft
en
(4
)
Ve
ry o
fte
n (
5)
´M
ean
Me
dia
n
Physical tools for making (%) 19.8 37.2 29.8 8.3 1.7 2.32 2
Tools for searching for information (%) 6.6 9.9 18.2 43.0 19.8 3.61 4
Tools for collaboration (%) 27.3 21.5 24.0 22.3 3.3 2.52 3
Tools for collecting information (%) 13.2 27.3 41.3 13.2 3.3 2.66 3
Tools for organizing, constructing, and
presenting data (%)
32.2 36.4 20.7 8.3 1 0.8 2.08 2
Tools for reflecting on and evaluating
knowledge and information (%)
16.5 41.3 33.1 9 7.4 - (0.0) 2.32 2
Research question 3. Students with least, between, and most experiences and their intent in their
future work.
In past education vs. future intent
Summary of the results
• Understanding the multidisciplinary nature of SD is a challenge.
• The results reveal the problematic interpretations that students have about the nature of SD and role of the forest. Conceptions of manners in integration of SD with school practices vary strongly.
• Students have very few experience of learning which is situated in diverse learning ecosystem. If this trend will continue, it will be very difficult to integrate SD and forest to school practices.
• The experiences in the students’ own school history and their perceptions of the roles of diverse learning ecosystem in their future careers as a teacher are deeply connected
If we agree, (as we should) that SD and forest are important parts of education, we should be able to do in teacher education following:
1. During their studies the students should face with complex and multidimensional challenges, phenomena and to embedded real objects outside of classrooms (cf. Vartiainen and Enkenberg 2013).
2. Students should have opportunities to work with relevant open learning tasks, to design their learning ecosystem and construct collaboratively solutions (cf. Vartiainen et al, 2012, Liljeström et al, 2013, Mitzuko et al, 2013, OpenForest –portal -Vanninen et al, 2013).
3. Learning processes should emphasize self-organization while solving complex multidisciplinary tasks (cf. Mitra 2013)
Implications
References:Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2011). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). New York: Springer
Mitra, S. 2013. Build a School in the Cloud http://www.ted.com/talks/sugata_mitra_build_a_school_in_the_cloud.html?utm_campaign=&utm_source=plus.url.google.com&utm_content=awesm-publisher&awesm=on.ted.com_TEDPrize2013&utm_medium=on.ted.com
Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). Making learning whole: An instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 51–86.
Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., & Pöllänen, S. (2013). The case of design-oriented pedagogy: What students’ digital video stories say about emerginglearning ecosystems. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-013 9284-6
Mizuko, I., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., ...Watkins, C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
NEP (2010). National Education Technology Plan. Learning powered by technology. Retrieved 2 October 2010 from www.ed.cov/technology/netp-2010
UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Education for Sustainable Development in Action, Technical Paper No. 2. Paris: UNESCO Education Sector.
UNESCO. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development: Learning for a sustainable world. Retrieved 2 October 2011 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001877/187757e.pdf
Vanninen, P., Liljeström, Enkenberg, J., Pellikka, I. & Pöllänen, S., (2013) Forest in teacher education: The Open Forest portal as a novel resource for learning. The International Conference on Sustainability, Technology and Education (STE2013) 29.11.-1.12. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
Vartiainen, H., Liljeström, A., & Enkenberg, J. (2012). Design-oriented pedagogy for technology-enhanced learning to cross over the borders between formal and informal environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(15), 2097–2119.
Vartiainen, H., & Enkenberg, J. (2013a). Reflections of design-oriented pedagogy for sustainable learning: An international perspective. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 57–72.
Vartiainen, H., & Enkenberg, J. (2013b, online first). Learning from and with museum objects: Design perspectives, environment, and emerging learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9311-8
Vartiainen, H. & Enkenberg, J. (in press). Participant-led photography as a mediating tool in object-oriented learning in museum. Visitor Studies.