First Post Implementation Review for the Watertown (NY ... · LABOR RELATIONS IEiilIiir!'J!!f...

LABOR RELATIONS

iir!'J!!f UNITED STJ1TESIEiilI POSTJ1L SERVICE

March 7, 2011

Mr. Cliff GuffeyPresidentAmerican Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO1300 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

r ..

MAR 8 2011

Certified Mail Tracking Number:70993400000905149736

,1..--'

As information, enclosed is a copy of the first Post Implementation Review (PIR) for theWatertown, New York area mail processing (AMP) study.

If you have any questions, please contact Barry Carpenter at (202) 268-6892.

John W. DockinsManagerContract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

475 L'ENFANT PlAZA SW

WASHINGTON DC 20260-4100

VM"N.USPS.COM (CA2011-190)

11. Losing FacIlity Information

• • , • , , -

Jan-01-2010: Jun-3l).-2010

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Dng & DestFacility Name & Type: Watenown PO

Street Address: 232 Commerce Par1l Dr

City: WatenownState: NY

50 Facility ZIP Code: 13601District: Albany

Area: Northeast

Finance Number:~~iil••••••••Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 136

Miles to Gaining Facility: 62.9 MilesEXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Jeff sandsSenior Plant Manager: NlA

District Manager: Edward Phelan

12. Gaining Facility Information

Facility Name & Type: Syracuse P&DC

Street Address: 5640 E Taft Rd.City: Syracuse

State: NY50 Facility ZIP Code: 13220

District: AlbanyArea: Norlheast

Finance Number: lIi.iii•••••••••Current 3D ZIP Codels): 130-132

EXFC office: YesPlant Manager: N/A

Senior Plant Manager: Mark DahlstromDistrict Manager: Edward Phelan

I 3. Background Information

Appro....al Date: July 29. 2009

Implementation Date: Jan-01-2010

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Date Range of Data:Processing Days per Year: 310

Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750

EAS Hours per Year: 1,825

Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing!New Facility Start·up Costs Update

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

4. Other InformationArea Vice President: Jordan Small

Senior Vice President, Operations: Steven J FOfteArea AMP Coordinator: George J Fusaro

NAI Contact: Jug 5 Bedl

November 28, 2008

21181201114:01

rev 11312008

PIR Data Entry Page

Approval Signatures

,

Watertown PO

~acuse P&DC

~361 '-------------------

Losing Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type:Facility ZIP Code:Finance Number:

Current SCF ZlP Code(s):

Implementation Date:

Date Range of Data:

130-132

01/01/10

Jan-01-2010 to

PIR Ty pe: ...:1",s,-,tPc.:I"'R'--__

Jun-30-2010

ACKNOWtEQGEMEf'IrT OF ACCOUNTABILITY - I aCknowledge thai I am accountable tor respectlng and supporting the fllegrity of aU official posta' reportingsystems. If'lCludlng fln3noaJ reports and !hose relatlnlj110 compliance With conuacnng. co..nplement, Of SlmJlar etlor1$ InvolvIl1g tne Investment and CJ(pendllure 01'linos_ as well al all sySlems to servICI! 10 our customers

LOSING FAC1LfTY-

Plant Manager:

Jeff SandsPnntecl Name

Senior Plant Manager:

N/APnntea Name

District Manager:

Edward PhelanPnnted Name

GAINING FACILITY:

Plant Manager:

N/APrinted Name

Senior Plant Manager:

Mark DahlstromPnntod Name

District Manager:

Edward PhelanPnnled Name

AREA OFFiCe-

Area Vice President:

Jordan SmallPnnled Name

HEAQOUARTERS:

Vice President Network OperationsDavid E. Williams

• ,,,,,0;>\,.1 ,••,,""

Commonts:

Signature

Signature

~=====-----

Date

Date

Date

Dale

PIR Approval Signatures

losing Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:



Gaining Facility Name and Type:Street Address:

City:

State:


Savings/Costs

Executive SummaryLast Saved: February 1S, 2011

Watertown PO232 Commerce Park Dr.WatertownNY136

Orig & Dest

Syracuse P&DC5640 E Taft Rd.SyracuseNY130-132

PIR Type:=1,...-SI_P_IR _Dale Rar'lgll 01 Data 111110·6130110

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non·Processlng Cran Wor1o.lloll( S9virogs (!flu M9lnVTranl)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Actual Change PIRvs Pre·AMP

$3,340,274

$3,629,131

$1,492,995

($720,508)

$1,543,575

$0

$9,285,467

(208,098)

Proposed ChangePIR vs Proposed

$2,037,642

$3,524,074

$1,069,111

($612,605)

$545,942

$0

$6,564,165

(5,598)

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position loss

PCESfEAS Position loss

$9,077,369 $6,558,567___-'5~0~ _'_1,,3 from Stafflng-C",ft

____1~0!C- _'7~ from Stafflng-PCESIEAS

ServiceFirst-Class Mail Service

Performance (EXFC DIN)

First-Class MailService Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class MailService Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Losing Current Qtr

97.23%

91.89%

94.58%

Gaining Current Qtr

____9::6~.2~8~'~V,'___ from Service Performance & CSM

___-'9e.6~.1co5~'~V,'___ from Service Performaf1C8 &. CSM

____9e.3"".5~8~'~V,,___ from Sltrvlce Perlormafl(;e &. CSM

Customer Satisfaction Measurement Residential atPFC level

Customer Satisfaction MeasurementBusiness/Preferred at PFC level

_________--'9'"2~'!.V,~ from Sltrvlce Performance & CSM

_________--'9"-O::'_'_V,"- from SeMce Performanc" & CSM

PIR Executive Summary

BACKGROUNDCalculation References

Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre - AMP Proposed - AMP PIRFunction 1 Annual Wor1thour Costs 27,154,289 25,851,658 $23,814,015.55

Non.Procenl!lg CflIft lNort<hoo, CG~1$ (ktn M,lrItfT••nl) 3,841,271 3,736,214 212,140PCESfEAS Workhour Costs 4,887,689 4,463,805 3,394,694

TransportatIon Costs 2,279,210 2,387,113 2,999,718Maintenance Costs 11,985,208 10,987,575 10,441,633

Space Costs $0 $0Total Annual Costs $50,147,668 $47,426,365 $40,862,200

Total One-Time Costs (202,500) (208,098)

Total First Year Costs $50,147,668 $47,223,865 $40,654,102

Staffing

Craft Position Total 598 561 548

PCES/EAS Position Total 43 40 33

1st PIR vs Pre 1st PIR YS Proposed ApprovedAMP (Approved) AMP

Functioo 1 Wor1<hour Savings $3,340,274 $2,037,642 1,302,631 1,302,631

Non-Processinll CrIIlllNorto.hou, S'wings (less MainVTr.ns) $3,629,131 $3,524,074 105,057 105,057

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $1,492,995 $1,069,111 423,884 423.88<\

Transportation Savings ($720,508) ($612,605) (107,904) -107,9().4

Maintenance Savings $1,543,575 $545,942 $997,634 997,634

Space Savings $0 $0 $0 0

Total Annual Savings $9,285,467 $6,564,165 $2,721,303 2.721.302

Total One·Time Costs (208,098) (5,598) ($202,500) -202500

Total First Year Savings $9,077,369 $6,558,567 $2,518,803 2,518,802

Staffing

Craft Position Loss 50 13 37 37

PCESJEAS Position Loss 10 7 3 3


Summary NarrativeLast Saved: February 15. 2011

Losing Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s):


Gaining Facility Name and Type:Current SCF ZIP Code(s)"

Watertown PO136

Orig & Dest

Syracuse P&DC130-132

Background

The Albany Performance cluster and the Northeast Area office have completed the first Posllmplementation review (PIR) of theArea mail Processing (AMP) proposal that consolidated originating and destinating mail from the Watertown, NY Post Office 10 theSyracuse, NY P&DC. This first PIR used data for the first six months following implementation, then annualized savings todetermine if the Postal Service increased efficiency by consolidating originating mail processing operations. The AMP wasapproved July 29, 2009 and implementation was completed by January 1, 2010.

The AMP affected mail from Watertown, NY zip code 136. Originating mail was cancelled on 1 advanced facer canceller system(AFCSs) in Watertown prior to the AMP implementation. One AFCS was relocated to the Syracuse P&DC along with the VerticalFiltration System (VFS) and Bio detection System (80S). The 2 OSCSs and OIOSS were also relocated to Syracuse. Collectionmail from Watertown is cancelled by AFCS in Syracuse, NY with the postmark, "Syracuse NY 132". There were no otherequipment relocations with implementation of the AMP.

Financial Summary:

Actual PIR 151 PIR vs Proposed

Total Annual Savings: $9,132,818 $6,411,516Total First Year: $8,924,711 $6,405,909

The consolidation shifted an approximate average daily volume of 368,060 originating and deslinating first handling pieces fromthe Watertown, NY Post Office to the Syracuse, NY P&DC. There were 22 upgrades for First Class and Priority mail, and nodowngrades. Periodicals had 348 upgrades and no downgrades. There were 916 and 10 upgrades for Standard mail andPackage Services respectively, with no downgrades.

Customer Service Considerations:

The Watertown EXFC ON service improved after the AMP consolidation

~tg:"~~~l~d CSM*·c.(7) (8) (9' (10) -- -_P_'-)___ - ~ (12)--~

Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day BuslPrfd, Percentaae Percentaae Percentaae Residential %ENG/G %ENGIG022008 93.19% 91.18% 87.29%

-

Before AMP 012008 94.24% 91.97% 82.02%

Q""" 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%03200& 0.00% • 0.00%

.."'....:;;- • • CEM* 03 201013 14 15 ,. 17

'~8m/MeFiscal Qusrter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day Question # Residential Top Bus Top

Percentane Percentaae Percentaae Two Box Two BoxQ32010 9 .23% 91.89% 94.58% lii%

022010 96.68% 88.48% 91.96% C4a i3~~ i2.1~

After AMP 0.2008 97.43% 93.74% 92.33% ca. " '" 83,0%

03200i 95.79% 93.52% 91.97% Q12a i2~ ....- - Q168 U.2'lo 76 &'ll>

C19 171~ 1.5%

PIR Summary Narrative

The Syracuse EXFC ON service stayed at the pre-AMP level.

;"~:'"'~~~~':' ',;,' CSM*- ,...7 8 /9 10 11 12

Filcil QUlrter Overnight 20lY 3 elY Bus/PrfdPercentage Percentage Percentage RealdentJll ·I.ENGJG %ENGJG

02 "'" 96.81% 94.68% 91.60%

Before AMP Q12009 96.51% 94.12% 85.12%Q-42OO8 96.29% 94.51% 93.83%022008 97.10% 95.53% ,.g'~~.I<'; "l.I" CEM* 03 2010

I SmiMed(13) (14) (15) (16) Qu.stlon' ResidenUal Top Bus Top

Two Box Two Box

Fiscal QUlrterOvernight 2 elY 3DiY

Percentage Percentage Percentlge 01 91.6% .....032010 - 96."" ~:~~:=

..,~~ y.," ••.•~ 92.1"

Q2 2010 95.92% 91.45% A.. 93.0"" " ...After AMP '" "'" 97.14% 94.68% 95.62% t--0121 2~% ~~

02 "'" 97.07% 94.98% 93.89% • ll4.2~ 766"-01. I 87.f%- r 8-45%

Transportation Changes:

Transportation has a cost of $720,508 against a projected cost of $107,904. An additional HCR trip. and a trailer size upgradewere added to ensure service commitments were maintained. Contract service changes have also been pending, resulting inadditional cost for extra trip expense.

Staffing Impacts:

Based upon the first two full quarters of data following the AMP implementation, the annualized Function 1, craft personnelchanges are summarized from the staffing comparison for complement as of end of Quarter 3 of 2010 versus the AMP. Therewas a net reduction of 50 craft employees, and 10 EAS employees. Locallnitiatives involving staffing/scheduling study impactsand the retirement incentive in the fall of 2009 contributed to the larger than expected complement reduction.

The approved AMP proposal identified a reduction of 37 craft and 3 EAS employee positions due to the consolidation oforiginating and destinating operations to the Syracuse, NY P&DC.

II Management and Craft Staffing Impacts

Iit':Ii,,·)\;e~";!. I·;. , ",.,1 .. • lIc," ';. c• '~ ':c.,I "t-;;" Total Total PIR Diff Total Current Total PIR Oiff '·1 . •1~::'{d3!i~.

Pre_AMP On On·RoUsRolls .'

Craft 113 63 (50 485 485 " (50IManagement 7 4 3 38 29 7 10

, Craft:: FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals


The staffing and management 10 craft ralios are summarized below.

1 : 6

MDOs+SDOs to Craft 1

(1 :22 target)

1 : 8

(1:25 target)

1 : 11

(1 :22 target)

Mail Processing Management to Craft Ratio

1 : 14

(1: 25 target)

Watertown

Syracuse 1 : 20 1 : 17 : 30 : 25

, Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals

J. Craft = F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

The USPS has not had to layoff any employees from the WatertO'M1, NY Post Office to achieve current complement levels andhas aggressively 'N041<.ed 'Nith the impacted employees for placement in career positions 'Nithin the identified area of considerationin accordance 'Nith the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN).

Maintenance Impacts:

For maintenance, the first PIR indicates a cost savings of 51,390,926 versus a projected savings of 5997,634 from the approvedAMP proposal. Additional Maintenance savings were realized as equipment was relocated out of the Watertown facility.

Space Impacts and One Time facility Costs:

The AMP actual one time cost at the time of 1a1 PIR is 5208,107 compared to projected cost of 5202,500 to move 2 DBCSs and aDlOSS to Syracuse. Equipment moves were completed and Watertown has no processing equipment remaining. In addition,relocation costs for employees placed in positions outside their commuting distance have been accounted for and total $ 122,384versus 5180.000 projected in the AMP proposal.

Conclusion:

The AMP proposal to move originating and destinating Watertown, NY Posl Office volumes to the Syracuse, NY P&OC projecteda potential first year savings of $2,518,802. The first Post Implementation Review after implementation annualized savings are$8,924,711. Overall results reflect greater than expected craft and EAS reductions and no craft additions at the Syracuse, NYP&Oe to process the Watertown volumes. Several local initiatives at both Watertown and Syracuse during the implementation ofthe AMP contributed to the Function 1 savings realizing savings above what was expected.


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction MeasurementLast Saved: February 15, 2011

PIR Type: 1st PIRImplementation Date: -=0""1,'=0""1""'1'=0---

Losing Facility: -iw"'a"'t:::eC'r1"-ow=n..:.p-'O"- _District· Albany

I

~~ CSM*(7_)__

~ ~ "~ ~ I (12)

Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 DayI

Bus/Prfd

>--- Percentaae Percentaae Percentaae Residential %ENGJG %ENG/G

-- 022009 931~~ 91.18% 87.29%

-- Before AMP 012009 94.24% 91.97% 82.02%o' 2008 0.00% 0.00°4 0.00% , I

032008 0.00% .. 0.00% I

>--- F ".~:;;~J.!\'~'" .TlI

~CEM* Q3 2010

--- (13 14 15 (17-~8m/Med

Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day Question # Residential Top Bus TopPercentaae Percentaae Percentaae Two Box Two Box

032010 9Tn% 91.89% 94.58% ~ 91.6% '99%022010

-- 96.68% 88.48% 91.96% 04a 936% 921%-

97.43% 93.74% I 92.33% 08a I IAfter AMP o. 2009I 93 "" 93 ""

- 032009 95.79% 93.52% I 91.97% 012a 929% 86'".. ~ 8"" , 766%- - 0191 871% 84'"

Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&DCDistrict: "A1ilb"a"n"'y,------------------

I .... :.. :*.;qf:;,.~·"'2~ ~."lt.·· ..: ;] CSM*

- (7) __ l8) (9)_ (10) (11 ) (12)

Fiscal Quarter Overnight 2 Day 3 Day Bus/PrldPercentaae Percentaae Percentaae Residential %ENG/G %ENG/G

_ 022009 96.81% 94.68% 91.60% -- Before AMP 012009 96.51°,4 94.12% 85.12°.4

o' 2008 96.29% 94.51% 93.83°,4032008 97.10% d% 94.18% ~

:.o;~1':<i.l::'1 .111 r:'t·p" .,,>;d CEM* Q3 2010

!Sm/Med

(13) (14) (15) (16) Question # Residential Top Bus TopTwo Box Two Box

Fiscal QuarterOvernight 2 Day 3 Day

Percentage Percentage Percentage 01 91.8% '99%032010 '96~ 96-:15""'- • .J.58% I

O'a 93.8% 921%~

022010 95.92°,4 93.89% 91.45% 08. ~ 93 ""After AMP O' 2009 I 97.14% 94.68% 95.62°,4 OT2a 92.'''' 86'"-- 032009 97.07% 94.98% 93.89°,4 y,.a 84.2% 766%

I 019 87.1% T 84'"(13) Notes: _

rev 3124/2010

• Customef Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement'" 2010 Data reflects most recently completed quartef

01 Overall SatlsfaetlOl"l (Ovllfall EJlpenence)

04a SahsfactlOl"l with ReceIVing (Expenence with flIOOlVlllg)

06a SahsfactlOl"l with Sending (Expenence WIth sendW\g)

0128 Sahsfacbon with most frequenlly ViSited PO (Expenence with most frequently ViSited POI

016a SalJSladionwJth most recent c:ontacl WIth USPS (Expe1lenoe with most recent contact wittI USPS)

Q19 Likely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

.... ~ .._ .......... I ....

'l""•>.'..

-_.,•··••·-------~--_.

~-··•-----,-In,.,..•11.",,"

•"'.'"•

".""'DO..-.."u.-.-_.=...

•·_..""""7. ,

•=;000'",,-, .•~_.,--,,_ ....-'CI:l,1l

•.-'u~-to.. .,.

."

~_on'"--._.-~

'" ','-,,,

-

--Wor_l>ou. C..-II· Combined FKllit101,..._,_ ....,

~I' W!II" '- ..._-.. .._-

Combined Facilities

~ .. l>o_<: -'..""."~••'--__

__c....e...-,_.

.I"..~..•...-=

...~

'n

-"$0/001

"••"."_..

.".....-~.....~......'"

·."..".."'",,-"..".--..~, .. m

"..'., ,

•

•

.~,,~

.","",,,-·110470'

1'$..,ot'

""·~,,.,,"'",.•..•....--._,.,.

.~. .,' .." ,

".•.,,,.,,.--.~on_..~,"'''.10""".-.'"-""'"-.... .,." "-·,,-

•".·•.••·••..•·..0.>1,,-·",,,..,,.,....".,,-

'"''''T.iCi.-_....lin,

-~,,.'oW>,,~····•·•··

__c...._~_.

- ·•··mOl.,"',:/1

·..""0".~

•

••··.,.,..,"Il<;l.'"

""Wo"·••·•

"= - --.._-- - --- -

lo..',

>:»0,..,.. ..Col<.....--=- -.... ....--__---::_-........,. ...--_-::- - .....--~ ....::- ....:~_ I ....~_ II - I .....':'... _ I ......::- II - I .....~_ I ......_ II = .._~_~_

- ~ - It ....... II

_ 2... _ ·M"'" .;a ... _ II"","'" ':1' ",..

---""~-===================

[;J . ; . i • II • i • i 0' II • ; • i oM " .. ; .. i e' II M ; =- i oM I== ..._ -=- .._ ..._--:.::-~ w_ ... _ -:=---- ........_ '";;....__ ..... ..._ _..=e- .....

..._c.--e:-_.

~'odMy:'-""-""~"'---------------

'''''"011DI_e:- ---'........-"'- _

Workhour Costs· Losing F.dity"'_'_'Il""

~., "r~

1~ ~g;PIII~" .k:..~,:~"..~_=~.~_==.",=__

," ,"--- _ ............w._ --- -- ----= ~- - ,..... ...- - '''~ ~- - ,,,~

~- - '''~ ~- - '''~

• ~~

• ~

~

• ~

• ~~· .~

• ~

• ~

• ~~

• ~

• ~~

• ~~

• ~

• ~~

• ~~

• ~

• ~~

• ~~

• ~

• ~

• ~~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

~

• ~

• ~

~

• ~

• ~

~

• ~

•

I•

~••••••• ~~

•~~

~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~~

• ~

•

I••••• ~~

• .•

~

~

~

•~

~

~

•~

~• ~

• •

I•••

~~

~~• ~

~

•~

~

= ---_ ~M -_..._~- - --- ----------

--~- -

'" . .-_.- _l"' .....",N._ --- -- ----= ~- - ,.. ~.. ,.- - ..~ ..- - ..~~-

~...~

~- - ..~••••• ~~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~~

~~.

• ~

• ~~

• ~

• ~~

• ~~

• ~~

• ~

• ~~· ~

~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

•~

~

• ~

•~

~

• ~

• ~

• ~

~

• ~

• ~

• ~

• ~

~

• ~

•

I•

~•••••••••• ~~

~

•~

~

• ~

• ~

• ~

•~

~

• ~

•~

~• ~

•~

~

~

•~

~

• ~

•~

• . ~

• ~ •

''''''''- 1.••.1In

----" "..._..-

,-- ----~- - ,.~

~- - ,.~

~- - ,.~,.no ~,,, "''-'.'" .,- •._-- ----- ~, -- - - -- - -..._..- ..._..-

".' .' /H&11 If'" .....".- •••001.._~

~-

._~

_ft - _'OOft ·_ft·'CICIO'I<

,.~

-_...._-~- ---

w ......... _-- " -.._..-•-

,.~

_.-, ~

'"=

PII_e-.l..-g

--'-"'"-""""~"'--------------

Wotl<ltov. Cosl5· G.inin9 f.cility.-__ .....,

• 0..~:

o'.. .--~

~ ,,,... .::..~-".~..._==.==••,,~.....

•

- ,.-PI".

", ..~

"Q .~..-, --1'-1" --'13_-.,t'OO'lII ,--

~..,- ••'0 ~,. •" •• ~-, 171112, .. ••, .,

m- _onL -"rn ,Q, 'l,a ''''a1'.,- _.~

.0' ..-, 'Q--- "'~....0" ,"" 13

•.,. .",,- ..•• "- ...,- 1...-m.,

•• ••• •••1>:111- m_.' '... --'" on.~ ---m •• ..-• •• •,...... •,om .-- mQ-- .,--- .",.,....-•" m,.

•''''1

__e-.~

"' ----- -~ ~ ~-~ ~

I'•.'"• • J'Ot-"O

" ". ,,-• - .'"- '51"- - .-

~ •-~ ~~..- ",- ,.,-· .• • 114•..". • •,,---· -" "., ..'•-"'-m

111"'01"D u.'2M 'S'-••1I.31tI

"" "..,-.01 ".

IZOI,*1.~

IU,_

-~'0111.

",.-1111--•'--" ".

'0' "" 'C_,-"....' •_.. ,,-,. '. •, '".. •n •'M, , l"lI'13 •, ,,- •

" " ••'. -~,"

, , •" .. l1ssn -=,,-~, -- •.., ... ...". =•.m •- ,.-.3••W 1'.~,...- -- ,,"'''',- ...',.'.,.., -... 11'_m,. ".-= ..." ".n, ~ •,

~ •PlIt_e:-.Gwq

,..

.......,...,....................

........................................................

•---- •

••••

In-J"'QU'

".,....,

••••••••••1l\I.•',..., ..,11"~

500.'"•••••

__e-.G...,.

= ---- -_..._-- - ---------

-----

----

" _..........,.,..- --- "'-

= ~- - ~- - ,.~

~- - ......2,*,»1''- .' ., •,..... •n ...' .... ...,.......,. ""_,00' 1._,....1>'1 I,IK.•H._ Ul'UN.'" ..,..- ....n --

If' .....'

.n.I''''''

,~

,........._.

---~- -._---= 10_:."__ 10_:'_1

"'"

-~ ,.~

_.-

._--..._~:..._ ..._:"'_lr

m ~' ..._._.._--.....--

a.-. "" ..._~_II

.,~,oK .,. ....-.....

Other Workhour Move Analysiso-~.O-010,no _10

-- -- •". ".. • on, , •,~ . JI"'",~

.'~ "'-- '.' ," .., , "," " ... ,..-- •.- ..-1'''''20 " ..,." " -, ,."ID " - n..- .- ,

..,,.,..., _:ItO • 1 •,""',.. , ., ,.., ,..

~- - ~

",

1111,.,. ,P 03.

• ...", '.. 14.

" ."2~

,,~.. .-m '"=

• -'"---'c-.--.-"". eI'.

PIR Other losing Craft WoriIhours II PIR Other Gaining Craft \/Vorkhours

~!~~~~.!!~!~.~~"~i~'iD!'Cti.,D$~n~,~:~~~!!.!~~~ 1~~~~~~!!!~~*~!~!,i~i,~.,c¥i.~¥Dij~!'~~~'i!!,!!!~~~ Ce:<, \ ~ ~fI\

-.• ".. - -.,o,~, '01 ~,

'" :1'-11 •.. ...

AU Supervisory Workhours •c§lUiI, !.WM --_<::.:, \

-'.- ,.- 'c_nl._ ",-'''')1 ' ....n 12''"1'.- ..- ..."I.JiIl " • .JiI' " ..." ".", 11.».

no- no- HD >1- ._- SOOJl,

"on Io4."un .- •'- ,- m-- ,.- '.. ' ,, .- . .• -'" ".-- ,,,,UD "

TOtilS ......_ .. ...". 101m,'"''

PIR Workhour Costs· Combined Facilities

TGta11 ,-

, __:It

,_~ 17'13... 1>001".. "" ..:II' :II,

I'.',M> _ ... TGtais

- ~

'~'T' ,~", ,0:1,).",'.)2S ".H. 5nl1'

'" '" •" "

"00,_"

Distribution to Other AMP Worksheet Tabs

......... """"-'eo.·II'

~- - ~

• • •U".ro. •S22i1.<>5' 2•.<>5' •• • •"" • •~ -,. •• •• •• • •'G' 'li' "GUI'

• •• • •- ,",.t.'

'"

~- -,",,11''''' "'_....11_71' , m'f3'.no ".no_U _U~,m .,17A.

11,231." ,"051.50,>

""""*' W>"',,"", eo.'!11

~~, -n<>5, , "<>5,S" "'TIl,.'.m.- 12.H1.H' ,'ClI.'"

I ..."UI5.~) nM~' UI>.I'S

ll.~,'" 5>.()l2.3" I' '1&<>5'• • •• •• • •• •"",," "",'" 1"'110.'

• •• •',(>01'.135 .(>01 .US •.:It....

il2.11l 21.172 "• • •• • •5',R'.'S. ".- 1,.M2.,.'

• • n,'"51,GlI.l'l 120'1.7 11,"'._,;1'

~."'"~

:.;."."'~_ ,,.J~

••••

•"".03:12' 22.

'"".\71

-

•••

.,

_""",,,",,,eo"lll

.,.""ta"$1,'".,-

Transportatioo- PVS_... ,__,,,,,

"",,.,1 51:.1i1

1 .o,,~•

. ..

.,,, .,.

".,ro: ,II""''''... ....3

(,''OW I'M~,IG)

_._.......____e-

_" 1"1

UfO 11:11.'n

... GI'li,.'-'."." "'0","

...~ ""001

n'

11..........., .n,.... .._. -.- -- ---.U,lIN ,~... m,

•.,).." ,t, ..."""." ... •"'US' , .._,.~

·'OOG'lO ·,wT...,

"'_..----"::."--

-, _. .- -- Pill .. "",_.

" ..- - - - -=C=~_"'_."_'''''C' u_.. ". ". .- ... ., ....',.... ..., ~ .- .,.

" ..... .. ., ... " .. ....., .. ,..,,.. .. .., .- ...,...»

~-...,,,,, ,,,'.. ,... ,, .~ ." ...,.. ~.. ,,,,'.',, '--- ,..., .".. .. .~ u_ ... . ,",,",,'" .. .- .'..,- .-.- ,.. ... ,... ..,. ... Ill"" ,,..,. ...,,,<:1. ,"'-" "'OIl' ""'" ... .1'_," . ,.. ,,- II'",.,... "- .. " ,.."''''

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

Stamng . PCESfEASl.aoIl... r--.,.""".... ~',....

J PCESo'EAS Position.

_ ,-.,......_ no<:

--- "',..,.PCESIEAS POlltlon_.•

"'OCII_T....-_ ........_,-· .-._-1....-......._

'-"'· -1 _

.. --.a__-_." ...._--" _.-.-....,. -----~===-=-.. ..---

• _ftO·""""··"•·

_._._._.

_.__II_..-"_.-_._._._._.. , :-" .._. ;_..

.-

-- 0-- Oft

Or>Ilolll

~-

...

Staffing - CraftLast Saved: February 18, 2011

PIR Type- 1st PIR

Losing Facility: Watertown PO

:11 :2) I" '4J I5J I •Finance#:_

7~!Casual On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-RoUs Total On-Rolls

Craft Positions PreAMP 111 PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP 1st PIR PreAMP Proposed 11t PIR

Function 1 • Clerk 1 0 5 0 2. 0 32 0 0Function 4 - Clerk 0 0 0 5 9 13 9 17 18Function 1 - Mail Handler 0 0 2 0 13 0 15 0 0Function 4 - Mail Handler 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 4 •Function 3A - Vehicle Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Function 38· Maintenance 0 0 1 0 19 5 20 5 5Functions 67-69 - lmtdfRehablVVC 0 0 1 3 1 J 3Other Functions 0 0 3 3 33 28 36 36 31

Total 1 1 11 12 101 50 113 63 63

Data Extraction Date: 10/10/09 V,rlances Total On·Rolia(10) (11)

hi PIR >n ht PIR VI

p~ AMP Pro_..d50 0

Percent 44% 00%

Gaining Facility: Syracuse P&DC Finance#~112 13 14 15 ,. 17 18 19 20

Casual On-Rolls Part Time On-Rolls Full Time On-Rolls TolalOn-RollsCraft Positions

Pre AMP 'sIPIR PreAMP 1st PIR Pre AMP 1s1 PIR Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 - ClerX 9 18 1 1 179 15. 189 197 178Function 1 - Mail Handler 4 16 19 ,. 123 119 146 146 J5JFunction 3A - Vehicle Service 0 • 3 2 24 25 27 27 33Function 38 - Maintenance 2 6 0 0 114 113 116 119 119Functions 67-69 - Lmtd/RehablWC 0 0 5 3 5 5 3Other Functions 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 1Total 15 4. 23 19 447 420 485 498 485

Data Extraction Date: 10/10/09 Variances Tota' On-Rolls

r·-----(23)-------r-----("i<4j-----li 1s1 PIR vs Pre AMP i 1st PIR vs Proposed j

Total Craft Position Loss:j 50 j 13 j·(Aj;Q-;,e;umbe-;;-.-;;c;-rried;;;;;;;;;jio-;.~&;~,;S,;;;;;'/)' )

(21) (22)hi PIR vs 111 prR VI

Pre AMP Proposed

o 130.0% -2.6%

rev 1nf2008

PIR Staffing· Craft

Transportation - PVSlast Saved: February 18, 2011

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Dale Range of Data: Jan-01-2010 -10- Jun-3Q.-2010

Losing Facility: Watertown PO Gaining Facility:reuse P&OCFinance Number: Finance Number:

{I} (OJ I') {ol (7) (a) 1'1 (101Vltlanee Varianee Vartanee Varlloce

P......MP PIR \IS PIR \IS Pre AMP Proposed P'R PIRvs PIRvs0 .., •PVS Owned E ul ment PVS Owned E ui ment

Seven Ton Trucks Seyen Ton TIUCIr.5 , , , 0 0Eleven Ton Trucks Eleyen Ton Trucks • , • 0 0S, le AllIe Tradot'l ~ le AllIe TradOA , , , 0 0Tandem Alde TniClOfS Tandem Axle TraClOfl 0 0 0Spotlers S 1M'

, , , 0

PVS Trani ortalion PVS Trans ortationNumber of Schedules Number 01 Schedules 0 0To~1 Annuli Mililge To~1 AMU.1 Mileage (14 z:)11 (1,(23 n

Total Mileage Costs .. .. Total Mileage Costs 0 $331,632 $331,132

PVS L..... PVS LeasesTowl v.nides LI.1Id Total VehICles Llased

Toul Lease COlts .. .. Total Lease Costs .. ..PIIS Workhour Costs PVS Workhour Costs

LOC31 11, e19 76-4 LOC 31 617,6711,76-4) 19,015 S9 015

LDC 34 C765, 766) LOC 34 (765, 766) S110 n4 '$110174

To~1 Workhour Costs .. .. .. Toul Workhour Costs $2,Ole,431 (SID1758 '$101 7SU

(11) Tout PIR vs P... AMP Transportltion-PVS Savings: $229,874(This number added to the&~ Summ8J)'

(12) Total PIR vs Proposed Transport.1tion.pVS Saving.: $229,874(lln number added 10 the ExttCUtJYe Summ"fY)

(13) Nottls: 11\11 S)'!KUSI P&DC "all has foul' 240n vetlicIesln 1M lIeet,

feV 1f612OO8

PIR Transportation - PVS

Transportation· HeRLast Saved: February 1a, 2011

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

(7) (8) (9) (101

15t PIR Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR

Annual Annual Annual AnnualCost Cost/Mile Cost/Mile Cost/Mile

(6)

ProposedAnnual

Cost

(5)

PreAMPAnnual

Cost

(4)

1st PIRAnnualMileage I

(3)

ProposedAnnualMileage

(2)

Pre AMPAnnualMileage

Losing Facility:..:W..:=at:.:e..:rt:.:o..:w..:n..:..:P..:O'-- _

(1 )

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Data Extraction Date: 07/01/10

Route #

#OIVlal

#CIV/al

#CIV/OI

#CIV/C!

#CIVlC!

#OIVlal

During 1st PIR we added three existing routes, which was not included in the apprOV9:::d:.:A"M::::-P__, r_--:;;;o;:;;;;i1#D1V/OI

13629

13013

13029

13013

13610

13611

136XX

#OIV/CI

#OIV/CI

#OIV/C!

#OIV/CI

#OIV/C!

#OIV/a!

#OIV/al

#OIV/a!

#CIV/OI

#CIV/O!

#QIV/OI

#DIVlOl

#DIVlOI

#DIVlO!

#DIVIOI

PtR Transportation HeR - Losing

#OIV/OJ

#OIViOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/OI

#DIV/Ol

#DIVlOJ

#DIV/OJ

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/Ol

#OIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOl

#DN/Ol

#OIV/OI

#OIVlO'

#DIV/Ol

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OJ

PIR Transportation HeR - Losing

#DIV/OI

#D1V/OI

#DIV/O!

#OIVlO!

#DIVIO!

#DIV/OI

#DIVlOl

#OIVlOI

#OIV/OJ

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVlOI

#DIVlO!

#DIV/O!

#OlV/Ol

#DIVJOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVlO!

#DIVlOl

#DIVlOI

Totals 157,609 $262,771 $370,675 $753,407 $1,67

I

lEGEND Variances Total Annual Costs

HCRDATA 1.1.10 (11) {lllHCRDATA 12.1.09 Chan. Analys'- ,.t PIR .... lit PIR.,.HCRDATA 10.12.09 P,..AMP PropoHd

HCRDATA 7.08 09 Dollars $490,635 $382732Percent 186.7% 103.3%

rev 1f7/2OO1J

PIR Transportaoon HCR • Losing

Gaining Facility: ~S~y~ra~cu~s:,:e~p~&::D::C::.... _


Data ExtractIon Date'

Orig & Dest

07/01110

Transportation. HeRlast Saved: February 18, 2011

eEl for Inbound Dock: _

eel for Cancellations·

PIR Type: Orig & Dest

eEl for OGP: _

CT for Outbound Dock"

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (6) (9) {101

Pre AMP Proposed P," Pre AMP Proposed P," Pre AMP Proposed P,"Route # Annual Annual

Annual Mileage Annual Cost Annual Cost Annual CostAnnu,l Annual Annual

Mileage MUe.ge Cost/Mile Cost/Mile CostfMl1e

#VALUEI .VALUEI #DIVI01

#CIVIQI

#OIVIOI

,DIVIOI

#DIVIOI#DIVIOI

.DIV/OI

.DIV/O!

#CIVlO!

.DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#OIV101#DIV/oI

#DIV/oI#OIVlO!#DIVIOI

#DIVfOl#DIV10!

.CIVlO!#DIVfOt#DIVIO!

#DIVIOI

#OIVIOI

#OIV101#OIVIOI#OIVIOI#DIVI01

#DIVIOI

PIR Transportation HeR - Gaining

#DIVIOI

#DIV/OI

#DMOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVJOI

#DIV/oI

#DIVfOI

#DIVlOJ

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#D1V/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVlO!

#DIV/oI

#DIVIO!

#DIV/ol

#DIV/ol

#DIVlO!

#D1VJOI

#DIV/OI

#DIVIOI

#DIVlO!

#DIVIOI

#DIV/o1

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOJ

#DIVlO!

#DIVIOI

#DIVlO!

#DIVIOI

#DIVfOI

#DIV/oI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DIVIOI

#DMOI

#DIV/OI

#DIV/OI


#QIVIOJ

#CIVIOI

tIOlVlOl

.DIVIOI

.DIVIO!

.DIVIO!

.DIWOl

#DIVlOl

.DIVIO!

'DIVlOt#OIVIOI

'OIVIC!.OIVIC!

.DIVIC!

#CIVIC!

'OIVIO!

Totals 0 0 0 SO SO SO #DIV/OI #DIV/OI #DIV/OlI

Varlancel Tolal Annual COltl Summary HCR LOllng & Gaining

(11) <'" (13) (1.)

Chana- An.IYIII 111 PIll. vi~::~'::;

111 PIll. vi 111 PIll. VIPre AMP Pre AMP PronoMd

DoIII~ sa sa Lolln" $490.635 $362,732P.",.nt .OIV/Ol .OIV/Ol GIlnln SO SO

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HCR Savings:(from losing and gainrno facilities)

$490,635

(14) Totalbt PIR vs Proposed Transportatlon-HCR Savings:(from losing and gaining facilitieS)

$382,732

Tolal Transportation

(15) (16)

lit PIll. VI lltPIRvlPreAMP PropoMd

HeR $490635 $382,732

PV' $229874 $229874

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR). $720,509

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): $612,606(This number earned forward to the Executive Summaf)')


Maintenance

Losing Facility; "WC.O"O"O-=CP00'--- _

Date ~ng. of Data;

Gaining Facility:

PIR Type': 1II PIR

Jan-Ol·2010

SyraCU$tl P&OC

Jun-3Q-2010

3511.~Z3 5 '43.1)ig

HJ.n8 , 35uge

1104 1!>O) S (1041501

24,&!>J , 24,&53

12(17325' 5 1217U1)

4U.800 , 200.014

1~14G4115 12HG4,

,75J,11~ S

~-

S 10.249,n4 S 10.~76,560 S 10.~41,633 S--

Mllinlenanc:;t~r~~:1 1.0,a.057 1 \.0'8.057 1

BDS TlIsllnllConSumablelonly" " " _

Workhour Activity

Parts and Supplies

Grand Total

F

~ MailProceuing s 4."'.ll43 S 4._.Jell S 4~"4(1(1 1L:::.:...~ --,'.q"~'.p,m••!!!.", _

F Building Equipmenl 1~'~'~s _

~ Building Services 1 2,831,320 1 ~.e31.320 S ~.~2711'0 s"L::::..:-==~ """-""·~'e-"",,,- _

LOC 3g Maintenance Operatlona S !iOG.4OiI S 5Oll.4OiI 5 !l3! 3(l2 S!=== ---'S~"...,o"'-" _~ MaIntenance, 201.J25 , 211'.Ge1 5 0 5

c..:::..fiRiijiii;iiiimTralnlns ---- ---- ---- -----

'-"-"-'-"-"-' -"-'''-'''"-'-'-''-''-'-'-''----

'"Va.iIInce1.t PIR toPro sl'd

o S 1l71.~04)' (5\1,0141

o S P 40,541} 5 p~ 257)S 1.443.541 S 394.257'

S 1,735.434 S 511.014 SGrand Total

MllinlerlanCa~:::kr~~e:5~'~5 0 5~ S~

BDS Tesllng S Q 5 0 ,Consumab~1 Only _

Workhour ACtiVity

Parts and Suppllos

F

~ Mail Proc... inQ , olIiIO.1-lO S Q S Q S (400,14611L:::.:... --",q'".'.pmO!!J'""-' _

F BUlIdlngEqulpmen1S~S~S Q S {H3.7~lS (l67.835l

F BUil~S:c=S~S~I QI~S~LDC 3& Maint.nanc. Operations S 14.24& S 23 S 0 S (14 2~9J S 12J)~=~__---:,...,-"S""",.,", _~ Maintenance S ~1..-so S ~.'7' S 0 S (51 4S01 S (5 '71)

c..:::..;;;"'''''"i..;;;i;Traininq ---- ---- ---- ---- ----

(11) 1It plR Y' pre AMP· Maintenance Savlnga:

l12) 1al plR Y' Prooo"d. Maintenanc. Savingll:

($1,543,575\($545,942\

ITh... numlle" carne<! lD<Wa'll to lhe """"lAI'" SlHIlm.-y)

(These numlle" earned l_a'll to the E.<__ SlImm.-y)

(13) Notlll:========================================================~"""_"_"",,,,,"

PIR MlllnlerlanCII

Distribution ChangesLast Saved: February 18, 2011

January 1,2010

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

(2)--"'=""'-'-'-==--

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) Yes

Losing Facility :~W~a",t",e"rt.::ow=n-,P..:O,,--___________ PIR Type:_-""st"Pc..I"-R'---_

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Oria & Dest Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2010 -- 10 __ Jun-30·2010

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s)revised as result of the approved AMP

OMM LOOl ---OMM LOll

X DMM LOO2 X OMM L201

OMMLOOJ ---OMIrA L601

[)Mid LOO4 ---OMM L602

X OMM LOO5 OMM L603---DMM LOO6 ---OMM l6Q.4

DMM LOO7 ---DMML605

OMM LOOS ---OMM L608

OMM LOO9 OhAM L607---OhAM LOIC DMM LSO,

(1)

(.., Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary ReportNASS

Facility HarM T.... ' No-Show LIlt. Arrival n eloNd UnlchdMonth Lalllla I a,.lnlna Flcllltv Cod< Schd Count " Count " C~' " Count " Count

Aug-10 Loslna Facllltv 136 Watertown, NY PO N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Sep-10 Losing Facility 136 Watertown, NY PO N/A NfA N/A NfA NfA NfA NfA N/A NfA N/A

Aug·10 Gainina Facilltv 130 Syracuse, NY P&DC 301 31 10% 97 32% 27 9% 243 61% 0

Sep-10 Gaining Facility 130 Syracuse, NY P&DC 342 39 11% 132 39% 0 0% 303 69% 0

(5) Notes: _

PIR DlstnbuUoo Changes

Data Extraction Date: 07107110

Losing Facility' Watertown PO

MPE Inventorylast Saved: February 18, 2011

PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: _---'J~a~o-O""'~-2~O~'~O'__- 10 - __....::Ju~n-'-"3o-'-"20~'~O=--__

Gaining Facility· Syracuse P&OC

II} 12) 13}

Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIREquipment

AFCS , 0 0

AFSM100 0 0 0

AFSM-Ai 0 0 0

AFSM ATHS 0 0 0

AFSM-ATHSIAJ 0 0 0

APPS 0 0 0

ClOSS 0 0 0

CSBCS 0 0 0

OBCS 2 0 0

OBCS.QSS 0 0 0

OIOSS 1 0 0

FSS 0 0 0

SPBS 0 0 0UFSM 0 0 0

FC I MICRO MARK 0 0 0

R060TGANTRY 0 0 0

HSTS IHSUS 0 0 0

LCTS I LCUS 0 0 0

UPS 0 0 0

MlOCR-lSS 0 0 0

MPBC5-0SS 1 0 0

TABBER 0 0 0POWERED

INDUSTRIAl 0 0 0EQUIPMENT

0

5 0 0

(101 NoMa:

(') 15) 16) (7) 18) (O)

P~'" P," Variance inPreAMP Proposed 1st PIR Rfiocation Relocation

Eauioment C.... CostsC....

AFCS , , • $53498 $53,498

AFSM 100 2 2 2

AFSM.Ai 0 0 0

AFSM ATHS 0 0 0

AFSM-ATHSJAI 0 0 0

APPS 0 0 0

ClOSS 2 2 2

CSBCS 0 0 0

OBCS 10 12 12 $15,000 $32,225 $17,225

OBCS.QSS 0 0 0

OIOSS 2 , • $7,500 {$7,SOOj

FSS 0 0 0

SPBS 1 , ,UFSM 1 1 ,

Fe I MICRO MARK 0 0 0

ReaOT GANTRY 0 0 0

HSTS IHSUS 0 0 0

LCTS I LCUS 1 1 ,LIPS 0 0 0

MlOCR·ISS 0 0 0

MPBCS·OSS 2 0 0

TABBER 0 0 0POWERED

INDUSTRIAl 0 0 0EQUIPMENT

0

Totals 2. 25 27 $22,500 $85,723 $63,223

Camedlo ISp«;e EvaJut/boll lindOthe< ee.t,

PIR MPE Inventory

rev 1I10t'200B

Customer Service IssuesL-.I s.,..., Fearu.y 11. 2011

• own; 13601

01123110

II:ZlPCocl.:136 3-01 II: ZJp Cod.: ).{)IgM ZIP Coo.:l"nAMP ... Pr....MP ,~ Pr....IIP ...

II-.·fll. - 11",_,". - 1lI-.·fll. - lion. _fll. - II-..FII. - __ fll. -up_lpm '",.. ,.. ,..

1-Spm '" 59 '" ..up_Spm 7 0 • 0~..... '" ", m "0 0 0 0 0 0 0

u.,. C'urnnlly 6ultnlr.d'Of' 'onl dellvery""? I 0 Ibolel _AI t'lmoVH II I Allull of AMP? I 0 I

,. CoIlKtkln Polntl_ ...m

Number pd<eclup~-fotll Numberol

lOling Facility W lett PO5-01g11: ZIP Cod.

DaU E.rtr1t;tion 0...:

.. OIltvery Perfonnlnce ReportP•• AMP

~11'Y p--,"

QTR 3 FY09 87.~

".~~

QTR t FY11OTR2FYOll n.1%OTR 1 FY 09 &o,NQTR4FY06 7el%

OTR 4 FY10

OTR 3 FY10OTR 2 FY10

n.4'llo

91-4,....%

5. A.UII UnM Inl16<l LOllng Flcfthy (WIndOW se.... lc. nmes] t Bu.ln... (Bulk) Mill Acceptanc. Houl'$

P,.AMP "....... ,..... "" .... "" - """ .00 5:00 .00 .00 .00 .00, '.00 ... "00 5:00 .00 .00... ... .00 .00 .00 .00... 5:00 .00 .00 .00 .00, ... ... 8:00 .00 .00 .00- NA NA NA NA NA NA

P.....IIP " ,.- "" - "" - """ 8:00 .00 8:00 .00 .00 5:00, '.00 5:00 .00 '.00 .00 5:00

'.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 "00,- 8:00 ... .00 5:00 .00 5:00, '.00 "00 .00 5:00 .00 .00- .00 100 .00 100 .00 '00

-1. Cln C'UIotOfMn obtlln a 1oeI! POltrNlr\ In acconllnc. wtItl appilclble po»kill. In 1M PtaUIO~.MMHI? v..

t. NOles: SY'!cu.. P&OC

Gaining Facility: "S""~~"",..",,P,&"DOC,- _

•. WI'III pOllma"" I. prlnled on collection mill?Llna 1Un.2

Syl'lIcu.. NY 132011. tnd n....

PIR C..I....... S.-..c:<l '-....

· .Space Evaluation and Other Costs

last Sailed: February 18, 2011

Losing Facility: Watertown PO

, ,

Date:

, .07/10/10

1 Affected FaalityFaOlity Name: Walertown PO

Street Address: 232 Commerce Park Or.City, State ZIP: Binghamton. NY 13902

2 One-Time Costs

Enter anyone-time costs: ....::$0::... $202.500 $122,315(These numbef1 shown below under One-TIme Costs section.)

3. Savings InlOl'mation

Space Savings ($): _...:$0,-_ $0 $0

'nn...=..:-:"""",,::::;:::.rs canied forward 10 the &'ecvtNe SummaI)')

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain

5. Notes: Fadlity Costs include removal of DPRCS and 010 sylern

Employee Relocation Costs 5180.000 $122.375 (557,6251

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs $22.500 $85.723 563,223(from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs $0 $0 $0(from above)

Tolal One-Time Costs 5202,500 5208.098 $5,598(Variance c.rned f()(Ward Lo

ExffCUtiw Su_l)')

.. III

-

"j In '" ,-, 110)

PAl AMP PN"'" PIR A..oclllt.d PIRProduct

A..od.lM! RECCott,.r 1,000 "'c ColJI,.r 1,000.-... lme~1

lAn... 1Mdl~•. KS uno """'. "...e_ ....... KS $31.48 """'. $33.03

PARSCCA ....... KS ....... """'. '101 ~1

PARS RedlrKt8 ....... KS ...,... """'. ....nAP,. NO NO NO NO

Gaining Facillly:"'S"y"ra"c"'u"se"""P",&"'D"'C'--- _

YTO Range of Report' Jan.-Ol 2010' Jun 3Q..2010

losing Facility: -'W"'a"'l"ert"'o"'wn="-p"'O'- _

'" '" '",., '"

PAl AMPPAl AMP PIA .....ocllll.d PIR

Product .....ocllltMl REC Cotl,.r 1,000 m COil per 1.000IINI~I ""''''

lAn... ....-..ctlb,KS »4.10 ''Ad''• NO

"'b ....... 1<5 $3140 ''Ad''. NOPARS CCA ....... KS 12llll.4V """'. NO

P...RI Redi.Kh _,K8 ..., .. """'. NOAP,. NO NO NO NO

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

First Post Implementation Review for the Watertown (NY ... · LABOR RELATIONS IEiilIiir!'J!!f...

Documents

Transcript of First Post Implementation Review for the Watertown (NY ... · LABOR RELATIONS IEiilIiir!'J!!f...