First Nations and Métis Students: A Faculty Guide
Transcript of First Nations and Métis Students: A Faculty Guide
June 2012
First Nations
and
Métis Students:
A Faculty Guide
2
Table of Contents
Purpose of the Guide 3
Glossary of Terms 4
Demographic and Historical Overview of Aboriginal
People in Saskatchewan 7
Teaching from an Aboriginal Perspective and Facilitating
Success of Aboriginal Students 13
Who’s on Campus?
University of Regina 18
First Nations University of Canada (FNUniv) 20
Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI) 23
Centre for Teaching and Learning (CTL) 25
Campus Contacts 27
Footnotes 28
Bibliography 30
3
First Nations and Métis Students: A Faculty Guide
This guide was created in partnership by the University of Regina, the First Nations
University of Canada (FNUniv, formerly the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College),
Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI) and the Centre for Teaching and Learning (CTL).
The University of Regina, through its federation with the FNUniv and affiliation
agreement with GDI, maintains a student population with high representation of First
Nations and Métis students.
This guide is intended to give faculty and staff the opportunity to learn:
A historical overview of Aboriginal people in general and in Saskatchewan;
Information about the First Nations and Métis people‘s learning processes;
Tips and useful suggestions for you to consider when teaching Aboriginal
students;
Who‘s on campus? Learn about the University of Regina, FNUniv, GDI,
CTL;
Resources for you to contact to learn more about Aboriginal people.
This resource was made possible through the generous contributions and hard work of the
following people:
Gaylene Anaquod, former Communications Officer, SIFC/FNUniv
Calvin Racette, former Executive Director, GDI
Lisa Wilson, Director, GDI
James McNinch, former Director, Centre for Teaching and Learning and
current Dean, Faculty of Education
Carrie Bourassa, Associate Professor of Science, FNUniv
Herman Michell, former faculty member, Dept. of Science, SIFC/FNUniv and
current Executive Director of NORTEP-NORPAC
Dr. Mary Hampton, Luther College
Dr. Joan Roy, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Psychology, University of Regina
Cara Bradley, Program and Communications Developer, Centre for Teaching
and Learning, University of Regina
Titilayo Olayele, Graduate Student Assistant, Centre for Teaching and
Learning, University of Regina
4
Glossary of Terms
Aboriginal – Aboriginal people are defined in Section 35 of the 1982 Canadian
Constitution as ―Indian, Métis and Inuit‖.
Assembly of First Nations (AFN) – The political body representing First Nations people
in Canada. The AFN was formerly known as the National Indian Brotherhood. For more
information, check out their website at www.afn.ca.
Centre for Teaching and Learning (CTL) - previously known as the Teaching
Development Centre (TDC) and the Centre for Academic Technology (CAT) aims to
enhance teaching and learning at the University of Regina by encouraging university
policies and practices that promote good teaching, providing services to support
instructional development initiatives, and acting as an instructional consultant and agent
of change.
Elder – An elder possesses sacred wisdom and sacred knowledge about First
Nations/Métis tradition and culture and transfers this knowledge in an oral tradition
through the generations. The First Nation community must accept an elder.
Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN) – The political body representing
First Nations people in Saskatchewan. For more information, check out their website at
www.fsin.com.
First Nation – refers to a status/treaty Indian; usually used to refer to a politically
autonomous band under the Indian Act, a nation of First Peoples.
First Nations University of Canada (FNUniv) - The First Nations University of
Canada, previously known as the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College, has been
effecting change through education since its inception in 1976 by offering certificate
programs, bachelor- and master-level degrees that are fully accredited through the
University of Regina. It is the only First Nations-controlled post-secondary educational
institution in North America.
Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI) – Owned by the Métis people of Saskatchewan, GDI
was formed in 1980 to serve the educational and cultural needs of Saskatchewan‘s Métis
community. GDI is the official education arm of the Métis Nation of Saskatchewan.
5
Indian – term with many usages: could be a person of Indian ancestry, a status Indian
under the Indian Act, or a treaty Indian.
Indigenous – Refers to all inhabitants indigenous to North America prior to contact with
Europeans and their descendants.
Inuit – northern Aboriginal peoples.
Métis – People born of, or descended from both European and First Nation parents.
According to the Métis Nation of Saskatchewan, a Métis person is one who self-identifies
as Métis, is distinct from other Aboriginal Peoples, is of historic Métis Nation ancestry,
and is accepted by the Métis Nation.”
Métis National Council (MNC) – The political body representing Métis people in
Canada. For more information, visit their website at www.metisnation.ca/.
Métis Nation of Saskatchewan (MNS) – The political body representing Métis people
in Saskatchewan. For more information, visit their website at www.mn-s.ca.
Michif – Michif is the heritage language of the Métis. The three Michif languages in
Saskatchewan combine varying amounts of French, English, Cree and Saulteaux,
resulting in three unique Michif languages. Besides being the name of a language,
Michif is also the name of a culture and a people within the Métis Nation.
Native – A group of people with common ancestry and who are socially, culturally,
politically and linguistically united.
Non-Status Indian – An Indian person who is not registered as an Indian under The
Indian Act, either because s/he or his/her ancestors were never registered, or because
status was lost through marriage or other provisions of the Act.
Reserve/Reservations – Blocks of land allotted for status/treaty Indians through
provisions in the Indian Act.
6
Senator – A First Nation or Métis Senator is a cultural and spiritual advisor to political
leaders. S/he provides guidance with regard to First Nation or Métis laws, customs,
government and history.
Status Indian – An Indian person who is registered as an Indian under The Indian Act
and thus recognized by the federal government as an Indian and accorded the
accompanying rights, benefits and restrictions of The Indian Act and related policies.
Treaty Indian – An Indian person whose forefathers signed a numbered treaty in which
land was exchanged for certain listed payments, such as money, tools, health and
educational benefits. The term is often used in the prairie provinces and is synonymous
with status Indians. All treaty Indians are also status Indians, however, not all status
Indians are treaty Indians because many status Indians in Canada never signed treaty.
7
Demographic and Historical Overview of Aboriginal
People in Saskatchewan
Demographic Snapshot
Saskatchewan is a province that lies in the heart of the grain belt and has a very diverse
population. Saskatchewan is often referred to as a ―treaty province‖ since it contains in
its boundaries six of the eleven numbered treaties in Canada – treaties 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10.
Section 35 of the 1982 Canadian Constitution defines Aboriginal people as ―Indian,
Métis and Inuit‖. Saskatchewan has the highest per capita Aboriginal population in the
country (approximately 12% of the total Canadian First Nations population live in
Saskatchewan1) and this population is growing at a higher rate than the general
population of the province. Statistics show that, from 1991 to 1996, the First Nations
population in Saskatchewan grew by 22% in what was otherwise a relatively stable
provincial population.2 This trend continues today, with 141, 890 (approximately 12%)
of Saskatchewan residents identifying themselves as Aboriginal people3 and demographic
projections indicate that the Aboriginal proportion of Saskatchewan‘s population will
grow to 22-23% by 20314.
According to 2006 census data, Métis people accounted for 34% of Saskatchewan‘s
Aboriginal population, with First Nations people making up the other 66%.5 The
Aboriginal population is increasingly become urban; recent statistics reveal that
Many Aboriginal people live in the cities of Prince Albert (34%), North Battleford
(14%), Saskatoon (9%), Yorkton (7.2%) and Regina (9%).6
Not only is the Aboriginal population in Saskatchewan growing, but it is also very young.
The 2006 census also revealed that while the non-Aboriginal Canadian population is
aging, the Aboriginal population in comparison is not. Almost half (48%) of Canada‘s
aboriginal population is under 24 years of age.7 According to population projections
released by Statistics Canada in 2005, Aboriginal people could account for a growing
share of the young adult population over the next decade. By 2017, Aboriginal people
aged 20 to 29 could make up 30% of those in their 20s in Saskatchewan.8
8
Historical Links to the Present
The Importance of Treaties
Aboriginal people in Saskatchewan have unique histories and culture. It is important to
understand, however, that their history is also our history. Each one of us has an
obligation to understand our history, respect each other‘s culture and work together to
address issues that affect all of us.
As mentioned earlier, Saskatchewan is considered to be ―treaty territory‖. In addition to
the six numbered treaties, there are also seven Aboriginal languages spoken in
Saskatchewan including Cree, Saulteaux/Ojibway, Nakota, Dakota, Lakota, Dene and
Michif, which is the language of the Métis.
Our history – Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal alike – is rooted in treaties and the treaty
relationship. It is important to understand the significance of the treaties and how they
came to be. Long before the ―discovery of the Americas‖ indigenous peoples occupied
the land in North, Central and South America. They had their own distinct societies and
practiced their own cultural, political, economic and social traditions. Those traditions
included treaty-making and alliance building.9 Through the treaty-making process, First
Nation peoples resolved disputes and maintained peace and stability which were essential
factors in their political and economic well-being.
After European contact when colonization began the treaty process soon followed. When
the process came west to the prairies, First Nations people knew what to expect. Through
their past experience in treaty-making as well as through their own networks of
information sharing, they knew what happened during the treaty negotiations in Eastern
Canada and the United States and used that knowledge in their negotiations.10
The British Crown had a long-standing tradition of treaty-making – often signing treaties
when it wanted to acquire new territories, establish military or economic alliances and
create peaceful relations with other nations. Much treaty development was preceded by
the Royal Proclamation of 1763 that was issued by King George III. It created
―guidelines for peaceful expansion of territory in British North America [and] the
Proclamation recognized Aboriginal peoples as nations and protected their lands . . .it
stated that only the British government could acquire First Nations‘ lands – acquisition of
lands by private individuals or corporations was not permitted‖.11
Eleven numbered treaties were signed between the British Crown and First Nation
peoples between 1871 and 1921 – six of those eleven treaties are in Saskatchewan.
Treaties were seen as being beneficial to both First Nations peoples and the British
Crown. During the latter part of the 1800s, buffalo herds were disappearing, the fur trade
was depleted and First Nation peoples were suffering from smallpox and other deadly
diseases. At the same time, settlement was accelerating and their whole way of life was
changing.
9
For the British Crown, treaties were a way for the government to open Western Canada to
settlement and demonstrate its sovereignty. The Dominion Government was well aware
of the expansionist pressures in the United States to extend the American border
northward into Canada.12
Treaties were intended to be binding, on-going relationships which is reflected in the
terminology of the treaties which states that the treaty relationship is to continue ―for as
long as the sun shines, the grass grows and the waters flow‖.13
However, although treaties
were signed in good faith, it has become clear that there were major misunderstandings
about what treaties meant to each party. Understanding each other was difficult at the
time and the British Crown relied on written documentation while First Nation peoples
relied on oral history.
One of the major problems is that even though treaties were concluded, the Government
of Canada did not enact laws to implement the provisions of the treaties and relied on
policies such as The Indian Act. The policies were aimed at ―civilizing and assimilating‖
First Nations people and often ended up taking rights away from First Nations. For
example, First Nations people were no longer able to take part in their traditional cultural
and spiritual practices.14
Over the last century, The Indian Act controlled every aspect of the lives of First Nations
people, from religion to education to the implementation of a permit system that forced
First Nations people to obtain consent to buy, sell or lease everything from livestock to
tools. Indian Agents and Farm Instructors kept profits made by First Nations people.
Until 1951, First Nations people could not hire a lawyer, use the courts or obtain a
university degree and it wasn‘t until 1961 when they were legally entitled to vote in
federal and provincial elections.15
In recognizing the unfairness of the treatment of First Nations people, treaty parties are
now looking beyond The Indian Act to understanding the treaty relationship and
implementing the terms of the treaties to find a better way for the future that will be
beneficial to everyone.
Emergence of the Métis
While First Nations people have a unique history, so too do the Métis people. The term
―Métis‖ means, ―mixed blood people‖. The Métis were the offspring of French fur
traders from the North West Company or British and Scottish fur traders from the
Hudson‘s Bay Company and Cree or Ojibway women. The contemporary Métis identity
is rooted in culture so a heavy emphasis is placed on self-identity.
The Métis played a key role in the fur trade, acting as interpreters and intermediaries
between First Nations people and the fur trade companies. As their numbers increased,
they developed a new and unique Aboriginal language and culture. Their ―Michif‖
10
language mixed the French, English, Cree and Ojibway languages and their jigs
combined dances of both the Scottish and the plains First Nations dances.16
The majority of Métis people settled in the Red River area in Manitoba. In 1869, it is
estimated that over 9,000 Métis and approximately 1,600 European settlers lived in this
area, as it was a key fur trading area. The area was originally controlled by the Hudson‘s
Bay Company until they sold a majority of their rights to Rupert‘s Land to the new
Dominion of Canada in 1869.17
The Métis had river lots modeled after the French farming system. When surveyors from
the Government of Canada came to the area, they broke these long plots of land along the
river into many small parcels of land – as was the British tradition. The Métis resisted
the take-over of their homeland by the Dominion Government and several uprisings
occurred, including the ―Red River Resistance‖ at Fort Garry and the ―Northwest
Resistance‖ at Batoche, Saskatchewan.
After the Red River Resistance, the Métis formed a provisional government and, led by
Louis Riel, set out for Ottawa to negotiate for Métis rights. Negotiations resulted in
agreement that the Red River settlement would enter Confederation as the new Province
of Manitoba. Manitoba did, in fact, become a province in 1870 when the Manitoba Act
was passed. Shortly after the passing of the Act, the Dominion Government proceeded to
dispatch a military expedition to the Red River settlement to establish control over the
new province and Louis Riel fled to American territory in exile.18
In 1874 an amendment to the Manitoba Act called for the distribution of ―scrip‖ to Métis
adults in an effort to extinguish their title to land. The holder of money or land scrip was
entitled to a certain amount of land or money. With the decline of the fur trade and
buffalo hunt, many Métis were in desperate need for money and scrip was often sold to
keep families from starving. By 1884, two-thirds of the Métis people had moved out of
the Province of Manitoba mainly westward to the South Saskatchewan valley and
northern Alberta. They began to resume their demands for a land base; however, the
Dominion government ignored their petitions.19
In the spring of 1885, the Dominion government dispatched the military to the Batoche
region and engaged the Métis in an armed confrontation. Louis Riel and Gabriel Dumont
were the leaders of the resistance. Louis Riel was hanged for treason and Gabriel
Dumont went into exile in the United States.
Education
Before contact with Europeans, First Nations people had their own educational processes.
Education was a life-long undertaking and the goal was to become a responsible member
of society – every person was trained to do something and contributed to the overall well-
being of the community. Children were taught by all members of the community and the
elders were transmitters of knowledge and wisdom. A close relationship with the
11
environment and learning about the relationship with nature was an essential component
of a child‘s upbringing.20
When the British Crown began to settle the territory known today as Canada, education
become the primary instrument used to ―assimilate and civilize‖ First Nations people.21
The Dominion Government established residential and industrial schools following the
signing of the numbered treaties. The objectives were to not only ―civilize‖ and
―christianize‖ but also to teach reading, writing and arithmetic. Residential schools
needed to be self-sufficient, so one of the goals was also to teach children how to become
farmers and housekeepers. This would also allow First Nations people to eventually
assimilate into mainstream Euro-Canadian society.
Many children were taken from their families around the age of 5 or 6 years old and saw
their families perhaps once a year until they were 15 or 16 years old. They were not
allowed to speak their language or practice their spiritual and cultural customs. At
residential schools, children also encountered physical, sexual, emotional and mental
abuse.
Residential schools nearly destroyed First Nations communities and left a legacy of
despair that was not addressed until 1972 when the National Indian Brotherhood (now
known as the Assembly of First Nations) published a document entitled ―Indian Control
of Indian Education‖. The document was released in response to then Prime Minister
Pierre Trudeau‘s ―White Paper‖ which was put forth in 1969. The White Paper called for
the elimination of Treaty rights, the transfer of responsibility for First Nations people to
the provinces and the elimination of the Department of Indian Affairs and The Indian
Act.22
The National Indian Brotherhood proposed that First Nations people needed to have
greater parental responsibility and local control of education. In 1975, Dr. Lloyd Barber
became the President of the University of Regina and was able to work with First Nations
people in establishing the only First Nations owned and controlled post-secondary
educational institution – the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College. On June 21, 2003,
the Saskatchewan Indian Federated College officially changed its name to the First
Nations University of Canada.
Métis people had a different experience than First Nations people. For the most part,
Métis children who were born during the fur trade era were educated in one of two ways.
Those children who lived within First Nations communities were raised and educated in a
traditional First Nations manner. Those who lived within the fur trade community were
raised and educated in a Christian and European manner. Schooling was provided in
mission schools that were established near trading posts. Often, the male children were
sent to mission schools while the female children had a more traditional First Nations
education that was passed on by their mother who was often of First Nations descent.23
The quality of education deteriorated after the signing of the numbered treaties and the
Northwest Resistance in 1885. Some Métis children were allowed to attend Residential
12
or Industrial schools if there was room; however, education of Métis children was, for the
most part, haphazard at best. During this time, neither the federal nor the provincial
governments would assume responsibility for the rights and issues of Métis people. The
federal government contended that Métis had signed away their rights during the scrip
process while the provincial government felt that the responsibility for both First Nations
and Métis people should rest with the federal government. It was not until the release of
The Piercy Report in 1944, which cited the grave educational and socio-economic
conditions of Métis people, that the province finally began to pay attention. In 1947,
legislation was passed allowing Métis people access to formal public education.24
Although Métis children were finally allowed to attend public school, no attention was
paid to their culture or language. Today, the Métis have their own educational institution
in Saskatchewan, the Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI). Despite the fact that the grave
socio-economic conditions of Métis people were also cited in The Piercy Report, little or
no attention was paid to those dispossessed Métis who were forced to live on government
road allowances. Those Métis came to be known as ―Road Allowance People‖.
13
Teaching From an Aboriginal Perspective and Facilitating
Success of Aboriginal Students
The material in this section is adapted from two sources: a paper “Teaching from an
Aboriginal Perspective” (2000) by Herman Michell, and a research report
“Strengthening the Circle: Facilitating Success of First Nations Students in a Non-
Native Post-Secondary Institution” (2000) by Joan Roy and Mary Hampton.
The research conducted by Roy and Hampton is based on data from four focus
groups that were conducted with First Nations students and professors from both
SIFC (predecessor of FNUniv) and the University of Regina. The research supports
Michell’s suggestion that “the professor/student relationship is the foundation for
facilitating success of First Nations students.”
The Centre for Teaching and Learning gratefully acknowledges the generosity of
these authors in allowing their work to be used in this guide. Michell, Roy and
Hampton agree on the importance of distributing this information as widely as
possible.
Introduction
Given the historical events that First Nations and Métis peoples have experienced, it is
important as post-secondary institutions to realize that people learn in different ways and
that often, the way we learn as individuals is rooted in our experiences. For First Nations
and Métis peoples, our experiences shape who we are, how we perceive the world and
how we learn.
This section is meant to serve as a guide for university teachers, but we must caution that
there are no ―prescriptions‖ of how to teach Aboriginal students. There has been
relatively little research done in this field. Generalizations can be dangerous and
education is a complex endeavour. We know there is a need to develop a variety of
pedagogical models. The following are suggestions that may work for you. Indeed the
humanistic and student-centred approaches identified below may well be appropriate for
all students. These suggestions, primarily from Michell‘s paper, are grouped according
to 5 themes identified by students and professors in the Roy & Hampton research:
Relationships, Curriculum, Teaching Methods, Teaching Style and Classroom Climate,
and Aboriginal Life Experience.
14
Theme One: The professor/student relationship is the
foundation for facilitating success of Aboriginal Students
1) Get to know your students. Honour the knowledge and skills students bring with
them into the classroom. Use these experiences as a basis for instruction. Build a
partnership based on mutual respect.
2) Do not humiliate students in front of their peers. Control your temper and instruct
in quiet patience. There is a time and a place for everything. Concentrate on the
behaviour and not the person. Be specific and offer guidance and direction.
3) Use humour appropriately. Self-deprecating humour and modesty are attributes
that many students appreciate.
4) Be accessible. Allow students multiple avenues and time where they can come
and see you to discuss assignments, lessons and problems.
5) First impressions always count. Demonstrate warmth and high expectations. Set
the tone, parameters and expectations of assignments in the first class. Be
consistent. Make sure the students understand by asking for feedback.
Theme Two: Including Aboriginal content in curriculum is a
tool for facilitating student success
6) Collaborate with Aboriginal elders to identify concept and content areas relevant
to culture and languages. Develop detailed and activity centred programs.
7) Actively engage in learning about Aboriginal history, colonization, culture,
languages, traditions, taboos and visions for the future. This will help you to
avoid classroom and community misunderstandings.
8) Concentrate on positive contributions made by Aboriginal people, but also show
the reality of their different living circumstances. Some live in urban and rural
and reserve environments.
9) Curriculum is organic and personal. Understand the oral tradition of narrative.
Actively ask questions and participate in Aboriginal communities, ceremonies,
gatherings, etc. Approach the elders and knowledge carriers of the community.
Learn about proper protocols when approaching elders – offer tobacco.
15
10) Critique the textbooks that you use in your courses. Many of them are Euro-
centric. They transmit values, norms, traditions, and stories of the cultures
producing them. Try to select texts that have an accurate portrayal of Aboriginal
experiences, and preferably by Aboriginal authors.
Theme Three: Teaching Methods: Learning is a Shared
Endeavour and Co-operative Experience
11) Use examples from Aboriginal contexts in order to explain concepts and lessons.
Start from what the student is familiar with and incorporate one aspect at a time
with the newer learning aspects. Focus on community concerns, issues and
problems – use local terms.
12) Encourage students to participate in what is learned, when it is learned, how it is
learned and how learning is assessed.
13) Use Aboriginal resource people in your courses. Be specific as to what you want
them to do or talk about. Ensure that it is in line with your course objectives.
14) Use a multi-sensory approach to teaching. The more input channels that are
accessed, the more likely it is that learning will occur. Different sensory channels
provide alternative memory anchors from which students can access information.
15) Use a variety of visual aids when explaining lessons, information and new
concepts. Many Aboriginal people are highly visual in how they come to
understand the world.
16) Traditional Aboriginal cultures have a rich and diverse array of approaches to
education. These approaches include experiential learning and storytelling, as
well as observation and apprenticeship. Use class discussions to balance lectures.
17) A good sequence for classroom instruction includes the following: review
material from last class – solicit questions – teach new content – solicit questions
– do an activity – review today‘s lesson.
18) Introduce problem-solving circles with scenarios that reflect Aboriginal
community realities.
19) Allow for peer teaching and group projects to encourage interaction where
students can freely participate verbally in private. Many Aboriginal students
appear shy when asked to speak up in public. Do not isolate them or put them ―on
the spot‖. Many Aboriginal cultures teach that we should listen more than we
should speak.
16
Theme Four: Teaching Style and Classroom Climate: “You
don’t take a class, you take a person.”
20) Let the students know that even though you are a university teacher, you are a
researcher and learner too. Be genuine. Say so when you don‘t know. Promote a
community of scholars. Humility is a teaching style.
21) Promote a sense of place and belonging in the classroom steeped in humility and
reverence for all life.
22) Do not attempt to ―rescue‖, ―save‖, or ―lower standards‖ for Aboriginal students.
Try to balance humanistic concerns with high expectations for achievement.
23) Show them their successes; provide feedback that is immediate and consistent.
Give praise that is specific. Some Aboriginal students prefer praise in private so
that they do not appear to be superior to their peers.
Theme Five: Understand the Life of Aboriginal Post-
secondary Students
24) Provide students the opportunity to explore their own identities and communities.
This will deepen their understanding of themselves as well as their local and
social world.
25) Do not ask Aboriginal students or expect them to be able to give a lot of
information about their cultures. This learning is life-long and acquired over a
lifetime. Some beliefs cannot be shared.
26) Allow enough time for a verbal response especially for Native language speakers.
They need time for second language processing. Do not interrupt the process and
do not allow other students to interrupt.
27) Become aware of communication patterns that are specific to different cultures.
For example, some Aboriginal people regard direct eye contact as confrontational.
28) Understand extended family obligations sometimes take precedence over school.
Appreciate that for some First Nations‘ and Métis students, life experience will
have been grounded in poverty.
29) Know too that First Nations‘ and Métis students deal with personal and systemic
racism on a daily basis.
17
30) Other barriers to success can be a lack of preparation for the university setting
because of their prior educational experience and a lack of appropriate role
models in their life. They may be the first person in their immediate family to be
attending university.
Conclusion
Roy and Hampton as well as Michell suggest that instructors adopt humility as a teaching
style, become more open-minded and accepting of the diversity of First Nations and
Métis students, and remain open to learning about Aboriginal cultures. Instructors must
also understand the life of Aboriginal students – who they are and where they come from.
Many students have experienced poverty, racism, and lack of positive role models or
influences in their lives that can impact on how they learn. As Michell points out, you
must not attempt to ―rescue‖, ―save‖, or ―lower standards‖ for Aboriginal students but
rather try to balance humanistic concerns with high expectations for achievement and
ensure that the students understand these expectations from the very first class.
The above are guidelines and examples to assist you in the classroom. For Aboriginal
people, learning has always been regarded as a life-long process and there are many ways
of teaching and learning. For instructors at the post-secondary level, it is important to
remember that all of us are on a life-long journey in the learning process.
“People perceive the world in different ways, learn about the world in different
ways, and demonstrate what they have learned in different ways. An
individual’s approach to learning and demonstration of what he or she has
learned is influenced by values, norms, and socialization practices of the
culture in which that individual has been enculturated”. 25
“Our results offer strategies for individual faculty members to use in facilitating
success. However, it would be a mistake to assume that as some individual
faculty members change attitudes and behavior, the success rate of [Aboriginal]
students will automatically increase. Changes need to be systemically and
societally implemented to make big differences. In addition, change must be
organizational in nature rather than in isolated subsystems of an educational
institution”.26
18
Who’s On Campus?
University of Regina
The University of Regina is a young and dynamic institution. Although we achieved
independence only in 1974, we have grown to10 faculties and 25 academic departments,
which have established reputations for excellence and innovative programs leading to
bachelor, master, and doctoral degrees. As well, teaching and research opportunities are
enhanced by 17 research units on campus.
Our main campus is located in the heart of Wascana Centre, a unique 930-hectare
development dedicated to education, recreation, culture, and the seat of government. The
new Campus and our historic 'old' campus provide an attractive work and study
environment for our students and nearly 1,700 faculty and staff.
The University of Regina has grown rapidly over the past few years. In the 2010/11
academic year, enrollment reached more than 14,200 full and part-time and the operating
expenditures were $152 million. The University also received $23.7 million in research
funding. Including capital and other spending, total expenditures were $230 million.27
Research efforts cover an impressive array of topics -- from alleviating the side effects of
chemotherapy to genetic control of grasshoppers to Native teacher training and distance
education.
The university has experienced impressive physical growth. From 1994 to 2009 campus
development led to an increase of more than 1.3 million square feet responding to the
needs of our faculty, our researchers and our students. In January of 1997, the $28 million
University Centre Building opened. This facility, since renamed the Dr. William Riddell
Centre, represents a unique partnership, bringing together the Students' Union, the
Faculty of Fine Arts, Student Services, a food court, and commercial enterprises. In the
fall of 2004, three new buildings opened:
a $38 million, 697-bed residence, which doubled capacity on campus;
a $32 million Centre for Kinesiology, Health and Sport; and,
the first phase of a $5.6 million emergency energy centre.
In 2009, the University of Regina developed a strategic plan entitled
mâmawohkamâtowin: Our Work, Our People, Our Communities.28
The Cree word
mâmawohkamâtowin means "co-operation; working together towards common goals".
The plan will position the University of Regina at the centre of this new Saskatchewan –
new in a cultural, economic, and demographic sense – rooted in and responding to the
needs and aspirations of all our partners, and reaching out to the world around the
university. The plan emphasizes three primary foci of the University‘s efforts:
Our Work: Teaching, Research, and Public Service
Our People: Engagement, Diversity, Success, and Esteem
Our Communities: Presence and Partnerships
19
An Aboriginal Focus
One of the fundamental priorities also outlined in mâmawohkamâtowin: Our Work, Our
People, Our Communities is building long-term relationships with First Nations and
Métis communities. That is, the University needs to "listen to, learn from, and work with
First Nations and Métis peoples and our colleagues at First Nations University of Canada
and the Gabriel Dumont Institute as we develop a comprehensive plan to build long-term
relationships, address the needs of First Nations and Métis learners, and reflect their
cultures across program areas and campus life‖.
The University of Regina is committed to achieving a representative workforce and
creating a welcoming environment for all employees. The University of Regina has been
an approved employment equity employer since 1989 and has been an Aboriginal
Partnership Agreement holder since May of 1999. Such agreements commit the
University of Regina to removing barriers to employment; auditing the workforce and
educational requirements and sharing that information with the external community; and
being proactive and open to partnerships with the diversity community.
In September 2000, the University of Regina signed a Memorandum of Understanding
with Saskatchewan Indian Federated College (now the First Nations‘ University of
Canada) to deliver the Aboriginal Cultural Awareness Program (ACAP) to university
administrative and academic departments. This program has evolved into the current
Aboriginal Awareness Training offered by Human Resources.
Overview of Aboriginal Awareness Training
The overall objectives of the program are to dispel myths and misconceptions, create
awareness of the historical factors that placed Aboriginal people in the current situation
they are in, to improve race relations and understanding of differing cultures by providing
information from an Aboriginal prospective, and to create knowledge of the current
agreements and initiatives that University of Regina has committed to. These sessions
also provide a safe atmosphere for any participant to ask questions in an open and non-
judgmental environment.
The Discovering Knowledge... Sharing a Path program is modelled after a Saskatchewan
Association of Health Organizations (SAHO) In Partnership training module. The
awareness training session is designed to be fun, educational and thought provoking.
Each session is a ½ day and can accommodate up to 30 people in a session.
Each Discovering Knowledge... Sharing a Path session includes the following topics:
Aboriginal Partnership Agreement
What is the Aboriginal Partnership Agreement?
Demographic reasoning, makes good business sense
20
Cultural Perspectives
An overview of the First Nations world view perspective on cultural beliefs and
teachings
An Elder will be in attendance to speak and answer questions
Historical Perspectives
Historical information regarding the Indian Act and the implications it had on
Aboriginal peoples from past to present
Treaties and Treaty Rights in Saskatchewan
The results, implication and current situation of Treaties and Treaty rights in
Saskatchewan
Introduction to the Métis
Historical overview of the Métis people, who they are and some of their past and
present-day struggles.
University of Regina, Environment
What have we done as an employer?
What do we need to do to improve our employee numbers?
What can you, as an individual person do?
Each participant receives a training manual and a "Discovering Knowledge... Sharing a
Path" workbook, supplying participants with an informational resource that will be
available after the session29
.
Information on upcoming offerings of ACP is available from Human Resources.
First Nations University of Canada
In 1976, very few First Nations youth attended university. The idea of a First Nations
University-College working in partnership with a provincial university seemed bold and
risky. Few believed it would work.
The SIFC (now FNUniv), created through a federated agreement between the University
of Regina and the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations (FSIN), serves the
academic, cultural and spiritual needs of First Nations communities.
Few could foresee that today First Nations University of Canada would be a successful
national institution serving over 2000 students from across Canada.
FNUniv Mission
The mission of the FNUniv is:
21
to enhance the quality of life, and preserve, protect and interpret the history,
language, culture and artistic heritage of First Nations.
The First Nations University of Canada will acquire and expand its base of
knowledge and understanding in the best interests of First Nations and for the
benefit of society by providing opportunities for quality bi-lingual and bi-cultural
education under the mandate and control of the First Nations of Saskatchewan.
The FNUniv is a First Nations controlled university-college that provides
educational opportunities to both First Nations and non-First Nations students
selected from a provincial, national and international base.30
Effecting Change through Education
The First Nations University of Canada believes that higher education is a cornerstone,
which empowers First Nations to move forward and impact the future in positive and
creative ways. As a federated partner, it is independently administered, thus delivering a
full spectrum of benefits to ALL campus students, and their communities.
The FNUniv offers its university programs and services on three campuses – Regina
(Main Campus), Saskatoon, and Prince Albert (Northern Campus). It offers distance
education and community-based university classes to First Nations communities across
Canada. These are co-ordinated and delivered by Northern Campus.
The FNUniv offers certificate, diploma, bachelor- and master-level degree programs that
are fully accredited through the University of Regina. The FNUniv is also involved with
the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, SK.) in certain programs.
The FNUniv has:
seen enrolment grow to over 2000 annually
graduated more than 3000 students into the workforce
gained a national and international reputation for excellence in academic pursuits—
close to 25 per cent of the student body comes from outside Saskatchewan
established a proven track record of sound financial and educational management
earned full membership in the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.
The First Nations University of Canada is the only First-Nations-controlled, post-
secondary institution in the country to be granted membership, making it part of the
decision-making process for university-level education in Canada, and opening doors
to many granting agencies that provide funds for research.
Meeting Needs
Statistics tell us that:
Canada‘s First Nation population is increasing rapidly.
22
Unemployment in First Nation communities has escalated to several times the
national average.
There are shortages of trained First Nation people in fields such as economics,
medicine, engineering, community planning, forestry, wildlife management, geology,
and agriculture.
These trends highlight the urgency to continue to focus on educating First Nations youth
to meet the educational and professional challenges of today and tomorrow. The FNUniv
plays a central role in facilitating the entry of First Nations people into Canada‘s
workforce. While education is a top priority for First Nations, the benefits of an educated
workforce clearly extend beyond First Nations communities to all Canadians.
It is important that First Nations students are educated within an atmosphere of cultural
affirmation and pride; it is also important that they interact with students from other
cultures in the Canadian mosaic—fostering greater cross-cultural understanding. It is
important that our non-First Nations students and other Canadians see the tangible
benefits of First Nations taking responsibility and effectively managing its Institution.
The First Nations University of Canada offers academic programming through the
Department of Professional Programs (Indigenous Education, Indian Social Work,
Business and Public Administration, Health Sciences and Nursing) and through the
Department of Interdisciplinary Programs (English, Indigenous Health Studies, Indian
Communication Arts, Indian Fine Arts and Indian Art History, Indian Languages,
Linguistics, Indigenous Studies, Environmental Health and Science, Resource and
Environmental Studies). FNUniv is leading in many areas of First Nations post-secondary
education.
The University also awards a significant number of scholarships annually.
In Partnership with the University of Regina
The First Nations University of Canada enjoys a unique position among First Nations
post-secondary institutions in Canada. While decidedly First Nations—and First Nations
controlled—the FNUniv exists in partnership with the University of Regina. The link
brings about cross-cultural interaction and carries significant academic benefits for both
institutions. FNUniv students access courses offered by the University of Regina.
Conversely, students enrolled at the University of Regina access courses offered by the
First Nations University of Canada. The partnership enables FNUniv to tap into a wide-
range of programs, services, and expertise from a respected and established university,
while still maintaining a distinct First Nations focus.
For more information, please contact FNUniv Office of Communications 306-790-5950
extension 2201.
23
Gabriel Dumont Institute
The Gabriel Dumont Institute (GDI) is the official education arm of the Métis Nation—
Saskatchewan (MNS) and the largest Métis educational institution in Canada. In 1980,
GDI was incorporated to serve the educational and cultural needs of Saskatchewan‘s
Métis community. The mission of the Institute is ―to promote the renewal and
development of Métis culture through research, materials development, collection and
distribution of those materials and the design, development and delivery of Métis-specific
educational programs and services."
GDI offers a wide variety of education opportunities and services for Métis people across
the province. Programs are offered at the university, technical, and upgrading levels.
Human resource development services are offered in a dozen Métis communities through
the Training and Employment arm of GDI. Each year dozens of scholarships are awarded
to Métis students by way of a Scholarship Trust established in 1985.
The longest running program of the Institute is the Saskatchewan Urban Native Teacher
Education Program (SUNTEP) offered in cooperation with the University of
Saskatchewan and the University of Regina. Since the program‘s inception in 1980,
SUNTEP has graduated over 1,000 students with their Bachelor of Education degree.
These graduates make not only economic contributions to the province but significant
social contributions as well.
In the fall of 2011, GDI released a report by economist Eric Howe on the importance of
closing the Aboriginal education gap. His findings include the revelation that Aboriginal
people who simply finish high school dramatically increase their lifetime earnings, and
by association, their quality of life. Finishing high school can mean anywhere from a
78% to a 134% increase in lifetime earnings for a Métis person.
As Aboriginal teachers, SUNTEP graduates have a unique opportunity to positively
influence the level of education attainment of Aboriginal students. SUNTEP graduates
act as role models to Aboriginal kids, helping them to stay in school, which leads not
only to narrowing of the Aboriginal education gap, but also to improved individual and
social benefits. Moreover, having an Aboriginal teacher also prepares non-Aboriginal
students ―for Saskatchewan‘s demographic future.‖
GDI also offers arts and science courses to its students through the Gabriel Dumont
College (est. 1994). In 2006, the Institute launched its Graduate Studies program, which
has supported dozens of Métis Master‘s and Doctoral students studying at universities
around the world.
The Dumont Technical Institute (DTI), which operates under the GDI umbrella, is
responsible for thousands of graduates in trades, health, business, and industry. In the
last ten years, DTI has contributed to the health sector by graduating hundreds of
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs). All DTI programs are community-based and are
24
strongly linked to local and regional labour markets. DTI also offers adult upgrading and
literacy programming. Programs are offered in over 20 locations in Saskatchewan.
Gabriel Dumont Institute Training and Employment (GDIT&E) offers career services to
Métis clients across Saskatchewan and operates community-based offices in a dozen
Métis communities. GDIT&E offers not only client support, but employer support as
well. Services include wage subsidies, summer student work experience, scholarship
matching, and ready workplace training. GDIT&E also actively forms partnerships with
interested employers to support employer links to the Métis workforce.
In total, GDI serves approximately 2,000 Métis clients and students each year.
In 1985, GDI established an endowment fund and scholarship program for Métis students
in Saskatchewan. Scholarships are awarded on the interest earned on capital investments
of over $2.5 million. Scholarship funds are administered by way of a charitable trust
agreement known as the Gabriel Dumont Scholarship Foundation II. The Gabriel
Dumont Scholarship Foundation II has provided scholarships to over 2,000 Aboriginal
students since 1986 and the total amount of scholarships awarded by the foundation has
surpassed the million-dollar mark. Scholarship trustees meet twice per year to administer
the awards. A wide variety of scholarships are available to Métis students. Details can be
found on GDI‘s website at www.gdins.org.
A Métis-specific library, and an award-winning publishing department, round out the
programs and services of the Institute. The GDI library is located in Regina and Prince
Albert and boasts one of the largest collections of Métis and First Nations materials. GDI
Publishing is recognized for its beautiful Métis-specific books and learning resources.
Dozens of GDI published books have won and been shortlisted for book and publishing
awards. Most recently, Gabriel Dumont: Li Chef Michif in Images and in Words by
Darren R. Préfontaine captured the Award for Publishing and the Book of the Year
Award at the 2011 Saskatchewan Book Awards.
GDI operates with a 12-member Board of Governors plus a Chairperson who is the MNS
Minister of Education. Each GDI Governor is selected from each of the 12 MNS
Regions. All Board members go through a three-step process for appointment that
includes nomination at a Regional Council meeting, followed by ratification and approval
by the Provincial Métis Council. Finally, approval by the Saskatchewan Minister of
Advanced Education, Employment and Immigration (AEEI) is required before an
individual is officially appointed to the Board.
All GDI Governors are Métis people who possess knowledge of the cultural, historical
and social circumstances of Saskatchewan‘s Métis. The collective skills of the Board of
Directors represent a number of different disciplines and perspectives. Some of the skill
set and training areas include education, finance and administration, business, human
resources, law, and communications, which taken together ensures a wide range of skills
and perspectives.
25
GDI has grown to become the most notable Métis educational institution in the world.
The unique composition of basic education, technical training, university, publishing,
human resource development, and cultural programming has made the Institute one of a
kind.
For more information, please contact GDI at 306-242-6070 and/or visit their website at
www.gdins.org.
Centre for Teaching and Learning
Previously known as the Teaching Development Centre and the Center for Academic
Technologies, The Centre for Teaching and Learning (CTL) strives to enhance a learning
centered environment at the University of Regina. The focus of CTL is on teaching and
learning, on exploring the nature of teaching and learning, on exploring how to make
sense of and how to improve teaching and learning, on learning how to conduct research
on teaching and learning, and on experiencing joy, excitement, and satisfaction in our
teaching/learning encounters.
The Centre‘s mission is to enhance teaching and learning at the University of Regina by
encouraging university policies and practices that promote good teaching, providing
services to support instructional development initiatives, and acting as an instructional
consultant and agent of change.
The goal of the Centre is to support on teaching and learning across the university. To do
this it provides the following services.
Resources:
Handbooks - A comprehensive guide for Graduate Student Teaching Assistants answers
many questions about seminar, lab, and classroom teaching.
Website - The CTL has its own website, which houses extensive teaching-related
resources, as well as links to other instructional development offices and websites.
Consultations:
Observations - Instructors who wish can invite a CTL member to observe their classes
and provide confidential feed-back on specific components including instructor manner,
teaching style, student-instructor interaction, class-room dynamics, and lesson coherency.
26
Video-recording - Instructors may wish to see for themselves what they look and sound
like in the class. The CTL will arrange and pay for a technician to tape your class and
give you the recording to review.
Peer Mentoring - The CTL can arrange for a colleague from the same or a different
department to collaborate with you on strategies for improving or changing some element
of your teaching. Advice and suggestions can also be sought from the Centre for
Teaching and Learning.
Teaching Dossier Preparation - Being recognized for your teaching begins by knowing
how to document your teaching development. Finding a balance between self-evaluation,
peer assessment and student ratings can be complicated. Providing evidence of student
learning can be even more problematic. The CTL will show you how to get started.
Programs:
Teaching Development Days - At the start of the fall and winter terms, are workshops
are offered for Graduate and Undergraduate Teaching Assistants which focus on the
practical aspects of lecturing, and working with students in classrooms, seminars, and
labs.
Graduate Citation Program- This is a flexible non-credit optional program leading to a
teaching citation for graduate students. Elements of this program include: learning theory,
teaching philosophy, instructional strategies, evaluation techniques, course design,
evaluation and preparation of a teaching dossier. Various readings, internet reviews, and
other appropriate tasks will be assigned throughout the duration of the program.
Seminars/Workshops - Throughout the year the Centre for Teaching and Learning offers a
number of different seminars and workshops. The centre offers workshops and seminars
on ‗Just in Time Teaching‘, ‗Campus Teaching Supports‘, ‗the Scholarship of Teaching
and Learning‘, and ‗Teaching Innovations‘
Research - We also engage in research into emerging technologies for teaching and
learning and provide outreach and support within the faculties and departments for
instructors to learn new skills in their own environments.
The Centre for Teaching and Learning will continue to:
Advocate for ethical and professional policies and practice that promotes good
teaching and teaching accountability,
Articulate a vision of effective teaching for the entire university,
Encourage responsibility for reflective professional development,
Foster a collegial community of university teachers engaged in scholarly teaching and
the scholarship of teaching.
Please contact the CTL at [email protected] or 337-2400 with suggestions, advice, or
questions.
27
Campus Contacts
First Nations University of Canada (general inquiries) 306-7905950
First Nations University of Canada, Student Success 306-790-5950
ex. 3001
Gabriel Dumont Institute (general inquiries) 306-242-6070
Gabriel Dumont Institute (SUNTEP Regina program) 306-347-4110
Gabriel Dumont Institute Scholarship Coordinator 306-657-5719
University of Regina Centre for Teaching and Learning 306-337-2400
University of Regina Aboriginal Student Centre 306-337-3158
University of Regina, Aboriginal, Diversity & Employment Consultant 306-585-5627
University of Regina, Harassment, Discrimination Prevention & Conflict Resolution
Services 306- 585-5400
28
Footnotes
1 2006 Census: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada in 2006: Inuit, Métis and First Nations.
http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/as-sa/97-558/p2-eng.cfm
2
Office of the Treaty Commissioner, 2000, p. 9.
32006 Census: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada in 2006: Inuit, Métis and First Nations.
http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/as-sa/97-558/p2-eng.cfm
4 Population Projections by Aboriginal Identity, 2006-2031.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-552-x/91-552-x2011001-eng.htm
5 2006 Census: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada in 2006: Inuit, Métis and First Nations.
http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/as-sa/97-558/p2-eng.cfm
6 ibid.
7 ibid.
8 ibid.
9
Office of the Treaty Commissioner, 2000, p. 10.
10
ibid, pgs. 10-11.
11
ibid, p. 12.
12
ibid, pgs. 12-14.
13
SIFC ACAP Module 1, Facilitator‘s Guide, 1999, p. 13.
14
Office of the Treaty Commissioner, 2000, p. 14.
15
ibid, 2000, pgs. 14-16 and SIFC ACAP Module 1, 1999, pgs. 18-20.
16
SIFC ACAP Module 1, Facilitator‘s Guide, 1999, p. 9.
17
ibid, p. 14.
18
ibid, p. 14.
19
ibid, p. 15.
20
ibid, p. 25.
29
21 ibid, p. 25.
22
ibid, p. 30.
23
ibid p. 27.
24
ibid, p. 27.
25
Herman Michell, 2000, p. 2.
26
Roy and Hampton, 2000, p. 68.
27 University of Regina Profile. http://www.uregina.ca/profile/
28
University of Regina Strategic Plan 2009-2014. http://www.uregina.ca/home/strategic/
29
Aboriginal Awareness Training, University of Regina.
http://www.uregina.ca/hr/careers/working/workforce-initiatives/awareness-training.html
30
First Nations University of Canada Mission. http://www.fnuniv.ca/index.php/mission
30
Bibliography
Brizinski, Peggy. Knots in a String: An Introduction to Native Studies in Canada, (2nd
Edition). University of Saskatchewan: University Extension Press, 1993, pgs.
406 – 414.
Furrie, Adele. First Nations and Métis of Saskatchewan: A Demographic Profile.
Published by Adele Furrie Consulting, March 31, 1998, pgs. 3, 8.
Michell, Herman. ―Teaching from an Aboriginal Perspective”. August 2000, pgs.
2, 19 – 21.
Office of the Treaty Commissioner of Saskatchewan. Treaty Awareness Speakers’
Bureau: An Introduction to Treaties. Published by Office of the Treaty
Commissioner, pgs. 9-14.
Roy, Joan and Hampton, Mary. ―Strengthening the Circle: Facilitating Success of First
Nations Students in a Non-Native Post-Secondary Institution”. December 2000,
Pgs. 2 – 5.
Saskatchewan Indian Federated College. Aboriginal Cultural Awareness Program,
Modules 1 and 3, Facilitator’s Guide, 1999, pgs. 9, 13 – 15, 23, 25, 27, 30
(Module 1) and p. 4 (Module 3).