Finite Element Analysis of High Pressure Titanium ...
Transcript of Finite Element Analysis of High Pressure Titanium ...
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 17
International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology
Journal home page: www.ijecrt.org
ISSN (Online): 2456-9852 Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019
Finite Element Analysis of High Pressure Titanium Spherical Pressure
Vessel
G. Krishnavenia , J. S. Soni
b, * ,C. S. K Prasad Rao
c , D. Krishna Vamshi
d , D. Ajay Kumar
e, L. Lokesh
f
a-f Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bharat Institute of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana-501510, INDIA * Corresponding author:
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. S. Soni).
ABSTRACT
Pressure Vessel is an enclosed container designed to hold or to store compressed air at a pressure substantially
different from the ambient pressure. Different shapes of pressure vessel exist but mostly cylindrical and spherical are
used. Spherical pressure vessels are theoretically two times stronger than cylindrical ones. A spherical thin walled
pressure vessel prepared by Titanium designed using software CREO and then carried out by using ANSYS.
Structural analysis is done for this vessel made of Structural Steel which works at pressure of 100 bar and 440 bar.
The fluid analysis is also done on Spherical Pressure Vessel and Velocity streamline flow.
Keywords: Pressure Vessel
FEA
Ansys
Structural Analysis
1. Introduction
Pressure Vessels have been in wide use for
many years in the chemical, petroleum, industries.
They are subjected to high pressures and
temperatures which may be constant or varying.
Factors such as material, shape, chemical
composition and physical substances used in it, the
atmospheric conditions of Pressure Vessels and etc.
are the factors which can have different effects on
performance of Pressure Vessels. The fluid being
stored may undergo a change of state inside the
Pressure Vessels.
The Pressure Vessels are designed with great
care because rupture of Pressure Vessels causes an
explosion which may cause loss of life and
property. The materials of Pressure Vessels are
brittle like cast iron or ductile such as mild steel.
Cylindrical or spherical Pressure Vessels
The basic requirements for design of Pressure
Vessels are safety, reliability, efficiency and
economy. Two types of analysis are commonly
applied to Pressure Vessels. The most common
method is based on a simple mechanics approach
and is applicable to thin-walled Pressure Vessels by
dentition have a ratio of inner radius “r”, to wall
thickness “t”, of r/t 10. The second method is based
on elasticity solution and is always applicable
regardless of the r/t ratio and can be referred to as
the solution for thick walled Pressure Vessels.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is a practical tool in
the study of air bottles, especially in determining
stresses in local areas such as cavities, O-ring
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 18
grooves and other areas which are difficult to
analyze manually.
1.2 Applications:
(i) Spherical Pressure Vessels are used in
domestic hot water storage tanks.
(ii) Mining operations- Diving cylinders,
recompression chambers, Distillation
towers, pressure reactors etc.
(iii) Marine applications- used in submarines,
space ship habitats.
(iv) Reservoirs- Pnuematic, hydraulic, rail
vehicle airbrake reservoirs etc.
(v) Liqufied gasses storage like ammonia, LPG.
(vi) Major in Oil refineries, petro chemical
plants, nuclear reactors.
2. Overview
2.1 Spherical Pressure Vessel
Depending on the ASME boiler and pressure
vessel code (BPVC), Code Section VIII, pressure
vessels are containers for containment of pressure,
internal or external. This pressure can be noted from
an external source or by the application of heat from
a source as a result, directly or indirectly from a
process, or any combination.
The ASME code is a construction code for
pressure vessels and includes mandatory
requirements, specific prohibitions and non-
mandatory guidelines for the design of pressure
vessels, manufacture, testing, inspection, testing and
Certification.
2.2 Shape of Pressure Vessel
Pressurized containers can theoretically be
almost all shapes, but spherical section shapes,
cylinders and cones are usually used. A common
configuration is a cylinder having end pieces called
heads. Main forms often either hemispherical or
stamped (torispherical). More complex shapes have
always been much more difficult to analyze for safe
operation and are generally much more difficult to
build.
In theory, a SPHERE is the best form of a
pressure vessel. Unfortunately, a spherical shape is
difficult to produce, therefore, more expensive, so
that most of the pressure vessels are cylindrical with
2:1 of the semi-elliptical heads or end caps at each
end. Less pressure vessels are collected from a pipe
and two lids. One disadvantage of these ships is that
big banks are more expensive.
2.3 Why should we use Spherical Pressure Vessel?
Fig 1. Layout of spherical Pressure Vessel
Consider the stresses on one half of the thin
spherical pressure vessel of inner radius r and wall
thickness t (Fig 2.).
Fig 2. Forces applied in Spherical Pressure vessel
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 19
Static equilibrium requires that the load
generated from the tensile stress in the wall be equal
to the load applied by the pressure. Since the vessel
is thin, the load due to the tensile stress in the wall
is 2πrtσ . The load due to the pressure in the vessel
is πr2p . Balancing these gives the expression for
the stress in a spherical vessel as
(1)
Due to symmetry in the spherical pressure
vessel, the stress in all directions tangent to the
surface of the vessel is the same. Depending on
weather one takes a stress element from the inside
or outside surface of the vessel, one will get one of
the two following states of stress (Fig 3.).
Fig 3. Stresses developed inside pressure vessel
Maximum Stress on Outside Surface:
The in and out-of-plane Mohr’s circles for a
stress element taken from the outside surface of the
pressure vessel will look as follows.
Fig 4. Shear stresses on the pressure vessel
As can be seen, the maximum and minimum
normal stresses and maximum shear stress are
(2)
As can also be seen, the maximum shear stress
is on a 45o out-of-plane incline as shown in the
figure 5.
Fig 5. Shear stress on 45o plane
The in and out-of-plane Mohr’s circles for a
stress element taken from the inside surface of the
pressure vessel will look as follows (Fig 6.).
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 20
Fig 6. Tension and shear stress in Mohr’s Circle
As can be seen, the maximum and minimum
normal stresses and maximum shear stress are
(3)
2.4 Parts of Spherical Pressure Vessel
A Spherical Pressure Vessel considered in this
work has the following parts:
a) Top Hemisphere
b) Bottom Hemisphere
c) Cap
d) Gasket
e) Bolts and Nuts
2.5 Materials Used For Spherical Pressure Vessel
In general, the materials used for manufacturing
a Pressure Vessel are:
a) Stainless Steel
b) Aluminium
c) Cast Iron
d) Titanium
So in this work, we considered a Spherical
Pressure Vessel made of Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V).
2.6 Design Requirements for Spherical Pressure
Vessel
In this work, the Spherical Pressure Vessel is
designed in the designing software called CREO
3.0. So, the following are design requirements that
are to be considered to fulfil the objectives of this
work.
1) Pressure Vessel:
Internal Diameter: 9.86 meters
Thickness (Diameter): 0.10 meters
Neck Length: 2 meters
Inlet Diameter: 1 meters
Flange Length: 6 meters
2) Cap:
Diameter of hole for Bolt: 1 meters
3) Gasket:
Inner Diameter: 1 meters
Outer Diameter: 2 meters
Thickness: 0.25 meters
4) Bolt and Nuts
Diameter: 0.25 meters
2.7 Properties of Titanium Alloy
The two most useful properties of the metal are
corrosion resistance and strength-to-density ratio,
the highest of any metallic element. In its unalloyed
condition, titanium is as strong as some steels, but
less dense.
The composition of TITANIUM alloy (Ti-6Al-
4V) is:
a) Titanium- 90%
b) Aluminium- 6%
c) Vanadium- 4%
The following (Table 1) are the properties of
Titanium:
Table 1. Properties of Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Name of Property Metric
Poisson’s Ratio 0.342
Young’s Modulus 113.8 Gpa
Density 4.43 g/cc
Tensile Yield strength 880 Mpa
Compressive Yield Strength 970 Mpa
Tensile ultimate strength 950 Mpa
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 21
2.8 Properties of Structural Steel
The percentage of Carbon present in Structural
Steel is 0.3-0.6%.
The properties of Structural Steel is as follows:
Table 2. Properties of Structural Steel
Name of Property Metric
Poisson’s Ratio 0.3
Young’s Modulus 2E+11 Pa
Density 7.85 g/cc
Tensile Yield strength 250 Mpa
Compressive Yield Strength 250 Mpa
Tensile ultimate strength 460 Mpa
2.9 Analysis Requirements for Spherical Pressure
Vessel
The following are the basic requirements for
undergoing Analysis:
a) Pressure maintained inside Spherical
Pressure Vessel: 400 Bar
b) Nodes taken : Random
c) No of Nodes to be considered: 8
d) Analysis done: Hoop Stress
e) Comparison done between: Titanium and
Structural Steel
3. Methodology
3.1 Problem Description
The work is to analyze spherical pressure vessel
prepared with Titanium and to compare it with
Structural Steel pressure vessel and also to perform
CFD on Spherical Pressure vessel.
Hence, to obtain the above results the
methodology is as follows:
(i) Designing in CREO.
(ii) Structural analysis of Titanium Spherical
Pressure vessel and Structural Steel in
ANSYS.
(iii) Compare the results of both Titanium and
Structural Steel.
(iv) CFD of Spherical Pressure Vessel in
ANSYS.
3.2 Solution Methodology
Designing
The designing is as follows:
A. Top Part: Open CREO→select new→select name→select top
plane→click sketch
Select→circle→click on origin→give radius as 9.86→draw
another circle→give radius as 9.96
select→line→draw line from outer circle parallel to vertical
axis→give length as 2→draw line parallel to horizontal axis
away from vertical axis→give length as 3→draw line parallel
to vertical axis away from horizontal axix→give length as
0.5→draw line parallel to horizontal axis towards vertical
axix→ give length as 4→draw line joining inner circle→esc.
Select→trim→remove unnecessary arcs→click ok.
Select→revolve→select 360 degrees→click ok.
select→top plane→click sketch→draw circle of diameter
3→click ok.
Select→centre lines→draw 2 centrelines at 45 degrees.
select→8 circles→give diameter 0.25→click ok.
select→extrude→select through the body→click ok.
B. Bottom Part Open CREO→select new→select name→select top
plane→click sketch
Select→circle→click on origin→give radius as 9.86→draw
another circle→give radius as 9.96
Select→trim→remove unnecessary arcs
select→line→draw line joining two circles→click ok.
select→ revolve→select 360 degrees→click ok.
C. Gasket: Open CREO→select new→select name→select top
plane→click sketch
Select→circle→click on origin→give radius as →draw
another circle→give radius as
2→click ok
Select extrude→give distane as 0.25→click ok
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 22
D. Cap: Select→line→draw line of 1.5 on horizontal axis from
origin→draw line of 6 parallel to vertical axis→draw line
parallel to vertical axis of 0.5 length→draw line parallel to
vertical axis of 8→draw line of 1.5 parallel to horizontal
axis→draw line joining other one→click ok.
Select→centre lines→draw horizontal and vertical centre
lines→esc.
Select→revolve→select 360 degrees→click ok.
Select→top plane→click sketch→draw circle of diameter
3→click ok.
Select→centre lines→draw 2 centrelines at 45 degrees.
Select→8 circles→give diameter 0.25→click ok.
Select→extrude→select through the body→click ok.
E. Bolt:
Draw a bolt of diameter 0.25 according to the
formulas and calculations.
F. NUT:
Draw a nut of diameter 0.25 according to the
formulas and calculations.
G. ASSEMBLY:
Fig 7 shows assembly
Fig 7. Assembly
3.3 Structural Analysis
Step 1: Static Structural
Engineering data= Titanium Alloy
Step 2: Geometry
Insert =import part
Step 3: Mesh
Generate mesh
Step 4: Static Structural
a) Selected inlet nozzle as Fixed Support
b) Selected remaining body as pressure applied
c) Pressure Applied = 100 bar, 440 bar, 1000
bar
Step 5: Solution
a) Total deformation
b) Von mises Stress
c) Von mises Strain
3.4 Analysis Procedure for Titanium Spherical
Pressure Vessel
Selection of analysis type, element type,
defining material properties, defining geometric
properties (real constants) are common steps for all
blade geometries.
1) Selection of Analysis Type:
The analysis type used for straight wind turbine
blade model is static structural steady state analysis.
By using following GUI path, the analysis type is
selected as shown below:
GUI Path: Main menu> tool box >structural
2) Defining Material Properties:
The material properties of materials are
specified as below table 3. Double click Geometry
and enter the properties of Titanium.
Table 3. The material properties of materials
Name of Property Metric
Poisson’s Ratio 0.342
Young’s Modulus 113.8 Gpa
Density 4.43 g/cc
Tensile Yield strength 880 Mpa
Compressive Yield Strength 970 Mpa
Tensile ultimate strength 950 Mpa
3) Importing the File:
The blade models created in CATIA V5
SOFTWARE can be imported for the analysis in the
ANSYS WORKBENCH. The blade importing
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 23
procedure is given in the following GUI path .The
imported is shown below:
GUI Path: geometry>right click> Import > I.G.E.S >
Ok > Browse the file > Open > Ok>model>right
click>edit.
4) Meshing:
For meshing (Fig 8.) straight wind turbine blade
models (Table 4.), the following GUI Path is used
as shown below:
GUI Path: Main menu>
toolbox>structural>geometry>aqua>meshing>generate
meshing>ok.
Fig 8. Meshing
Table 4. Elements and Nodes
Blade
model Elements Nodes
Solid 3349 1497
5) Solution:
Case 1: The nozzle part is given fixed support (Fig
9.). Select all the three faces of the nozzle.
GUI Path: Main Menu >AQAV >static structural >fixed
support>Apply
Fig 9. Fixed Support
Remaining body is given pressure at different
pressures (Fig 10.).
GUI Path: Main Menu >AQAV >static
structural>pressure >Apply > Structuralarea>ok
Fig 10. Pressure Applied
Solution: Form the above given boundary
conditions the problem can be solved.
Main Menu > Solution (A6) > Solve > Ok.
Case 2: The same method is applied for Pressure
vessel made of Structural Steel. The properties are
shown in table 5.
Table 5. The properties for Pressure vessel made of Structural Steel
Name of Property Metric
Poisson’s Ratio 0.3
Young’s Modulus 2E+11 Pa
Density 7.85 g/cc
Tensile Yield strength 250 Mpa
Compressive Yield Strength 250 Mpa
Tensile ultimate strength 460 Mpa
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 24
6) Deformations Obtained:
Von mises Stress (Fig 11.):
Fig 11. Stresses on Pressure Vessel
Von mises Strain (Fig 121.):
Fig 12. Strains induced in Spherical Pressure Vessel
3.5 Fluid Analysis
Start ANSYS Workbench by choosing the Start
menu, then select the Workbench option in the
ANSYS program group.
Start → All Programs → ANSYS 17.2 →Workbench.
This display the Save As dialog, where you can
browse to a specific folder and enter a specific
name for the ANSYS Workbench project.
Step 1: Click on Geometry → Import geometry→
browse the file→ prompted to select the desired system
of length units to work → select Meter → Ok.
If it is not prompted then click → units →meters.
Click on generate and the object is imported.
Step 2: Click on mesh → generate mesh → object has
been meshed (Fig 13.).
Fig 13: Meshing
Then click on mesh right click and chose edit option
and create Inlet, walls and Outlet through name and
selection option (Fig 14, Fig 15, Fig 16).
Fig 14: Fixed support
Fig 15. Walls
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 25
Fig 16. Outlet
Step 3: Click on Setup→ Edit→ Double precision→
Serial→ok.
General→ check → Report quality → Aspect
Ratio → 2.82360e+01→materials →air→
create/edit→ ρ=1.225→ν=1.7894e-0.5→
change/create→ close
Set some general settings for the CFD analysis.
Select General in the navigation plane to
perform the mesh-related activities and to
choose a solver.
Set up your models for the CFD simulation.
Models → Energy → Edit.
Select viscous and select turbulent flow.
Set up the boundary conditions for the CFD
analysis
Boundary Conditions → velocity-inlet-large →
Edit.
Select Components from the Velocity
Specification Method drop-down list.
Step 4: Calculate a solution. Start the calculation by
requesting 500 iterations.
(i) Enter 500 for Number of Iterations.
(ii) Click Calculate.
As the calculation progresses, the residuals will be
plotted in the graphics window and a popup appears on
the screen as calculations done and the solution gets
converged.
Step 5: Displaying Results in ANSYS FLUENT and
ANSYS CFD-Post
Display results in ANSYS FLUENT. With
ANSYS FLUENT still running, we can perform
a simple evaluation of the velocity and
temperature contours on the symmetry plane.
Later, we will use ANSYS CFD-Post (from
within ANSYS Workbench) to perform the same
evaluation (Fig 17, Fig 18, Fig 19, Fig 20, Fig
21).
Fig 17. Residuals for the Converged Solution
Fig 18. Velocity Streamline Flow
Fig 19. Velocity with volume rendering
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 26
Fig 20. Pressure with Volume rendering
Fig 21. Inner wall temperature
4. Results
4.1 Comparison between Titanium Spherical
Pressure Vessel made and Steel:
1) At Pressure 100 Bar:
Table 6. Comparison between Spherical Pressure Vessel made of
Titanium and Structural Steel at 100 bar
Titanium Structural Steel Max Min Max Min
Stress 5.3839e8 92000 5.3928e8 1.1026e5
Strain 0.005037 2.221e-6 0.002931 1.110e-6
2) At pressure 440 Bar
Table 6. Comparison between Spherical Pressure Vessel made of
Titanium and Structural Steel at 440 bar
Titanium Structural Steel Max Min Max Min
Stress 2.3689e9 4.480e5 2.2738e9 4.4555e5
Strain 0.022165 9.537e-6 0.012896 4.885e-6
4.2 Comparison using Graphs
1) Stresses developed
Fig 22. Stresses produced
2) Strains induced:
Fig 23. Strains induced
4.3 Flow Analysis Results
Fig 24. Residuals for the Converged Solution
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 27
Fig 25. Velocity Streamline Flow
Fig 26. Velocity with volume rendering
Fig 27. Pressure with Volume rendering
Fig 28. Inner wall temperature
5. Conclusion
A spherical thin walled pressure vessel prepared
by Titanium designed using software CREO and
then carried out by using ANSYS. Structural
analysis is done for this vessel made of Structural
Steel which works at pressure of 100 bar and 440
bar. The fluid analysis is also done on Spherical
Pressure Vessel and Velocity streamline flow.
References
[1] Amir Afkar, “Design and analysis of a
spherical pressure vessel using finite element
method,” M.S. thesis, Faculty of Electrical,
Mechanical and Construction Engineering,
Department of Automotive Engineering,
Standard Research Institute (SRI), Karaj.
(2013).
[2] Josip Sertić, “STRESS AND STRAIN
ANALYSIS OF THE SPHERICAL PRESSURE
VESSEL”, ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL
APPROACH, 5th
DAAAM International
Conference on Advanced Technologies for
Developing Countries, Rijeka, Croatia. June
28-30 (2006).
[3] Oludele Adeyefa,“Finite Element Modeling of
Shop Built Spherical Pressure Vessels”,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. (2013).
[4] Bandarupalli Praneeth “Finite Element
Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping
Design”, International Journal of Engineering
Trends and Technology, Volume3, Issue5.
(2012).
[5] V. V. Wadkar “DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF
PRESSURE VESSEL USING ANSYS”,
Assistant Professor, Mechanical Department,
AITRC, Vita, India. (2015).
[6] K. S. J. Prakas (2014),” Industrial Spherical
pressure vessel design & analysis using FEA”,
International Journal of Computational
Engineering Research (IJCER)., ISSN (e):
2250 – 3005, Vol, 04, Issue, 10, October–
2014.
G. Krishnaveni, J. S. Soni et al. IJECRT- International Journal of Engineering Computational Research and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2019)
© 2019 Published by IJECRT 28
[7] G. Nagendra, “DESIGN & ANALYSIS OF
INDUSTRIAL SPHERICAL PRESSURE
VESSEL USING FEA”, Professor Department
of Mechanical Engineering, Vijay Rural
Engineering College Nizamabad, Telangana,
India.
[8] U.R. Devaraju, “Design Investigation into the
Stress at the Base of a Nozzle of a Pressure
Vessel “, M.Tech Student, Dept. of
Mechanical Engineering, Govt. Engineering
College, Hassan.
[9] Daniele Melideo “CFD analysis of fast filling
strategies for hydrogen tanks and their effects
on key-parameters”, European Commission
DG-Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for
Energy and Transport, Petten, The
Netherlands. (2014).
[10] Xueguan Song, “A CFD analysis of the
dynamics of a direct-operated safety relief
valve mounted on a pressure vessel”,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Dong-A University, Busan 604-714, South
Korea.