Findings and Insights July 2016 - Tata Power · PDF fileFindings and Insights July 2016. 2 ......
Transcript of Findings and Insights July 2016 - Tata Power · PDF fileFindings and Insights July 2016. 2 ......
Tata Power Employee Engagement Survey 2016
Findings and Insights
July 2016
2
Flow of the session
Key highlights from the study
Results & Emerging insights
Suggested way forward
Key demographics results including subsidiaries
3
Key Highlights From the Employee Engagement Study
Tata Power Engagement steadily improves to 74%, to be better than industry top quartile. Difference in engagement across other units continues to widen (43% to 87%)
Employee experience improves across all engagement drivers, however critical improvement areas remain similar (Delivery on Promise, Leadership, Career)
Top Management continues to be most engaged, but need to invest more effort in JMs
Overall relatively new employees (<5 years) are less engaged than others (69% vs. 76%). Worthy to note that the 90% of incoming talent is engaged for the first 6 months
Development support for managers, especially at Middle Management level, results in improved employee engagement and satisfaction on managerial aspects
1
2
3
4
5
4
Aon Hewitt’s Engagement Framework
*Drivers not part of SED
**Drivers part of SED ONLY
Business
outcomes
Manager
HR
Leader
Action
Areas
WORK
EXPERIENCE
Engagement Drivers
The basics
The workCompany
practices
Foundation
Communication*
Customer focus
Diversity
People & HR Practices
Values* Safety
Security*
Work Environment
Pay
Collaboration*
Autonomy/ Choice
Co-workers
Innovation
Decision-making/
Execution focus
Organization Energy
Organization
Structure
Resources
Valuing People
Work Processes
Work Tasks
People
Performance
Brand
Differentiators
Delivery on
Promise
Organization
Reputation
Senior Leadership
Manager
Career opportunities
Learning and
development
Managing performance
Recognition
Engagement
Outcomes
Engagement
Score
Engagement
Owners
5
0
100
Bottom
Quartile
Moderate
Zone
Engagement Scores Across Various BUs at Tata Power
Power
Industry
Average
Power
Industry
Top
Quartile
AH BE
India 2015
Aon India
Pan
Industry
Average
India
Manufacturing
Average
India
Manufacturing
Top Quartile
Tata Group
Average
67% 69% 83% 67% 60% 65% 54%
CTTL 52%21
TP Solar 43%228
N Score
Tata Power* 74%2941
SED 58%665
Nelco 87%135
Powerlinks 65%40
Note: Units arranged in descending order of team size
*Includes Tata Power, International and TPCDT
Top
Quartile
Movement in
Benchmarks 7% 2%8% 2%9%
6
Mixed Trend of Employment Experience Across Years, Where Tata
Power* Exhibits Consistent Improvement
Note: Units arranged in descending order of team size
*Includes Tata Power, International and TPCDT
56%55% 43%
2014 2015 2016
Tata Power* 2941 66%
69% 74%
SED 665
52%
60%58%
TP Solar 228
CTTL 21 72%64% 52%
Powerlinks 4070%
85% 65%
Nelco 13550%
48%87%
Results to Action
62%
68%
50%
87%
73%
67%
5%
20%
29%
5%
3%
0%
5%
12%
39%
20%
12%
2%
7
Engagement behaviors 2014 2015 2016
Power
Industry
Top
Quartile
Best
Employer
2015
Engagement Score 66% 69% 74% 69% 83%
I would not hesitate to recommend this
organization to a friend seeking employment73% 73% 76% 78% 88%
Given the opportunity, I tell others great things
about working here73% 74% 77% 78% 88%
It would take a lot to get me to leave this
organization63% 66% 71% 73% 76%
I rarely think about leaving this organization to
work somewhere else58% 61% 67% 62% 71%
This organization inspires me to do my best work
every day73% 74% 78% 71% 86%
This organization motivates me to contribute more
than is normally required to complete my work64% 65% 72% 66% 83%
Employees Exhibit Improved Perception on All Engagement
Behaviors Including ‘Stay’
*Includes Tata Power, International and TPCDT
+3
+3
+5
+6
+4
+7
8
Engagement behaviors 2014 2015 2016
Power
Industry
Top
Quartile
Best
Employer
2015
Engagement Score 66% 69% 74% 69% 83%
I would not hesitate to recommend this
organization to a friend seeking employment73% 73% 76% 78% 88%
Given the opportunity, I tell others great things
about working here73% 74% 77% 78% 88%
It would take a lot to get me to leave this
organization63% 66% 71% 73% 76%
I rarely think about leaving this organization to
work somewhere else58% 61% 67% 62% 71%
This organization inspires me to do my best work
every day73% 74% 78% 71% 86%
This organization motivates me to contribute more
than is normally required to complete my work64% 65% 72% 66% 83%
Employees Exhibit Improved Perception on All Engagement
Behaviors Including ‘Stay’
*Includes Tata Power, International and TPCDT
+3
+3
+5
+6
+4
+7
Demographic 2015 2016 (N)
Age: 30-40 years 58% 68% (1103)
Tenure: 1-2
years53% 65% (172)
Tenure: 2-5
years52% 59% (799)
ME03 49% 57% (757)
ME04 56% 65% (301)
Demographic 2015 2016 (N)
Tenure: <6 months 68% 86% (21)
ME02 61% 69% (649)
9
15%
20%
40%
26%
14%18%
41%
28%
12%14%
37% 37%
14%17%
40%
29%
5%
12%
40%43%
Actively disengaged Passive Moderately engaged Highly engaged
Positive Shift in the Engagement Distribution with Proportion of
Moderately and Highly Engaged Employees Similar to AH BE Trend
Fence sitters Engaged
Tata Power*
2014
Tata Power*
2015
Tata Power*
2016
Global
Power Top
Quartile
AH BE India
2015
Engaged-Disengaged
Ratio~4:1 ~5:1 ~6:1 ~5:1 ~17:1
*Includes Tata Power, International and TPCDT
2016: 74% (N-2941)
Average score >= 5.5Average score>= 4.5 and < 5.5Average score <3.5 Average score>= 3.5 and < 4.5
10
Engagement Experience Improves Even Among Repeat Employees
Engagement
Level
Actively
disengagedPassive
Moderately
EngagedHighly Engaged
N 375 505 1173 798
Highly Engaged 16% 20% 31% 66%
Moderately
Engaged18% 33% 47% 26%
Passive 20% 25% 13% 4%
Actively
disengaged 41% 19% 6% 2%
No response 5% 2% 2% 2%
2015
2016
Engagement of Repeat Respondents 2016 74% (N-2777)
Engagement of 1st Time Respondents 2016 76% (N-164)
11
Engagement Experience Improves Even Among Repeat Employees
Engagement
Level
Actively
disengagedPassive
Moderately
EngagedHighly Engaged
N 375 505 1173 798
Highly Engaged 16% 20% 31% 66%
Moderately
Engaged18% 33% 47% 26%
Passive 20% 25% 13% 4%
Actively
disengaged 41% 19% 6% 2%
No response 5% 2% 2% 2%
2015
2016
Engagement of Repeat Respondents 2016 74% (N-2777)
Engagement of 1st Time Respondents 2016 76% (N-164)
Respondent Profile:
• 19% OMO
• 27% ME02; 37% ME03
• 13% Jojobera; 15% Mundra
Respondent Profile:
• 19% ME01
12
Positive Trend in Engagement Levels Across Most Businesses
Note: Units arranged in descending order of team size
66%
84%
68%
86% 82%
73%
88% 88%
Tata Power International TPCDT
2850 59 32
indicates >=5% improvement in perception scores2014 2015 2016
71%67%
64%
51%
67%
49%
72% 69%63% 61%
70% 68%
74% 73%70% 68%
84%
63%
MO Corporate OMO CGPL MPL TPTCL
1041 663 534 310 251 40
+14%
-5%+7%+7%
13
73%
58%
74% 59%
82%
64%
86%
65%
89%
82%
Organization reputation Delivery on promise
63%63%
55%
49%
65% 64% 54% 48%
74% 71%
65%
57%
70%62% 58%
85%81% 79%
73%
Managing performance Learning & development Career opportunities Recognition
64%58%
64% 61%
75%
64%
69%62%
82% 83%
Manager Senior leadership
Brand Leadership
Performance
Initiatives on People Practices, Recognition and Manager Capability
Create an Impact as Employees Report Better Work Experience
+8%
+11%
+11%
+9%
+7%+9%
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
+5%
indicates >=5% improvement in perception scores2014 2015 2016 Industry TQ BE 2015
14
73%
58%
74% 59%
82%
64%
86%
65%
89%
82%
Organization reputation Delivery on promise
63%63%
55%
49%
65% 64% 54% 48%
74% 71%
65%
57%
70%62% 58%
85%81% 79%
73%
Managing performance Learning & development Career opportunities Recognition
64%58%
64% 61%
75%
64%
69%62%
82% 83%
Manager Senior leadership
Brand Leadership
Performance
Initiatives on People Practices, Recognition and Manager Capability
Create an Impact as Employees Report Better Work Experience
+8%
+11%
+11%
+9%
+7%+9%
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
+5%
indicates >=5% improvement in perception scores
Relationship with managers
improves basis coaching
programs like ‘Giftwork’ and
capability development
programs targeted towards
ME01 and MD02.
Manager capability
improvement reflects in
stronger systemic
processes regarding
performance
management
Renewed focus
on development
needs and TNCI Programs such as Xpressions
and Celebrating Engagement
Heroes reinforces desired
behaviors and encourages
desired progress
2014 2015 2016 Industry TQ BE 2015
15
77%74%
67%61%
48%
78% 76% 71% 62% 56%
81% 80%
73%69%
60%
81%70%
81%
Values Customerfocus
Communication Diversity People/ HRpractices
82%
70% 72%67% 69%
64%
57%61% 59%
56%
84% 71% 74% 69% 70% 67% 59% 62% 59% 56%
87%
79% 78% 76% 75% 74% 72%68% 67%
63% 61%
70%75%
60%66%
58%63% 60%
91%87% 85%
81% 83% 83%79%
85% 83% 84%
Co-workers Organizationenergy
Autonomy Worktasks
Valuingpeople
Resources Innovation Collaboration Organizationstructure
Workprocesses
Decisionmaking
Work
87%
75%
55%
90% 79% 58%
91%85%
65% 67%
65%
80%
Safety Security Workenvironment
Pay
Company Practices The Basics
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
+7%
+7%
+6%
+7%+6%
+9%
indicates >=5% improvement in perception scores
Initiatives on People Practices, Recognition and Manager Capability
Create an Impact as Employees Report Better Work Experience
+5% +5%
+5%
2014 2015 2016 Industry TQ BE 2015
HR initiatives like HR 100+,
SRIJAN, QPM, Samaksh,
Connect2Solve and various
formal/informal connects
resulting in improved perception
on People/HR Practices
16
77%74%
67%61%
48%
78% 76% 71% 62% 56%
81% 80%
73%69%
60%
81%70%
81%
Values Customerfocus
Communication Diversity People/ HRpractices
82%
70% 72%67% 69%
64%
57%61% 59%
56%
84% 71% 74% 69% 70% 67% 59% 62% 59% 56%
87%
79% 78% 76% 75% 74% 72%68% 67%
63% 61%
70%75%
60%66%
58%63% 60%
91%87% 85%
81% 83% 83%79%
85% 83% 84%
Co-workers Organizationenergy
Autonomy Worktasks
Valuingpeople
Resources Innovation Collaboration Organizationstructure
Workprocesses
Decisionmaking
Work
87%
75%
55%
90% 79% 58%
91%85%
65% 67%
65%
80%
Safety Security Workenvironment
Pay
Company Practices The Basics
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
+7%
+7%
+6%
+7%+6%
+9%
indicates >=5% improvement in perception scores
Initiatives on People Practices, Recognition and Manager Capability
Create an Impact as Employees Report Better Work Experience
+5% +5%
+5%
2014 2015 2016 Industry TQ BE 2015
17
Deliver on Promise, Leadership and Career Opportunities Continue
to be Suggested Areas of Improvement
2016 Employee
Engagement at
Tata Power
74%
2014 2015 2016
To
p d
rive
rs im
pa
cti
ng
En
ga
ge
me
nt
Delivery on
Promise
Senior
Leadership
Work
Processes
Career
Opportunities
Decision
Making
58% 59% 64%
58% 61% 64%
59% 59% 63%
55% 54% 65%
56% 56% 61%
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
Impacts are basis Aon model based on RWA analysis vis a vis Aon Best Employers benchmark
18
Simpler and More Agile Work Processes Needed to Drive
Engagement at Work
2016 Employee
Engagement at
Tata Power
74%
2014 2015 2016
Work
Processes
Impacts are basis Aon model based on RWA analysis vis a vis Aon Best Employers benchmark
Work processes allow me to be as
productive as possible
Employee Verbatim on what’s working well:
• Safety related processes, EPM are excellent
• System based processes that are well defined enable employees to do the job in the right manner
Employee Verbatim on what’s not working well:
• Work processes are tedious and cumbersome, and add to the employees’ work load (e.g., addition of SAARTHI)
• Work processes should be simplified and made more agile and high on efficiency
• The work processes should be reviewed and revamped to enable faster decision making and defining accountability
59% 59% 63%
Higher than organization average
Lower than organization average
MO Corporate OMO CGPL MPL TPTCL
Work processes allow me to be as
productive as possible63% 59% 62% 61% 76% 48%
19
Better Clarity on Career Opportunities Will Help Improve Perception
on Employees’ Future at the Organization
2016 Employee
Engagement at
Tata Power
74%
2014 2015 2016
Career
Opportunities
55% 54% 65%
indicates suggested focus areas of 2015
Impacts are basis Aon model based on RWA analysis vis a vis Aon Best Employers benchmark
Sufficient opportunities to gain new skills 68% 69% 74%
Someone provides valuable career guidance 55% 54% 63%
Excellent opportunities for strong performers NA NA 62%
Future career opportunities look good 52% 51% 57%
Employee Verbatim on what’s working well:
• IJPs are regular and employees receive communication on available opportunities
• Regular transfers and rotation provides opportunities for on job growth
• Employees appreciate the potential for opportunities in the organization, and are positive about the future as the company grows
Employee Verbatim on what’s not working well:
• Currently there is little visibility of the career path and growth in this organization
• We need to create more opportunities for cross functional/cross location transfers and switching to the new roles should be faster
• Career growth is slow, in spite of expected performance
20
Better Clarity on Career Opportunities Will Help Improve Perception
on Employees’ Future at the Organization
2016 Employee
Engagement at
Tata Power
74%
2014 2015 2016
Career
Opportunities
55% 54% 65%
Sufficient opportunities to gain new skills 68% 69% 74%
Someone provides valuable career guidance 55% 54% 63%
Excellent opportunities for strong performers NA NA 62%
Future career opportunities look good 52% 51% 57%
Employee Verbatim on what’s working well:
• IJPs are regular and employees receive communication on available opportunities
• Regular transfers and rotation provides opportunities for on job growth
• Employees appreciate the potential for opportunities in the organization, and are positive about the future as the company grows
Employee Verbatim on what’s not working well:
• Currently there is little visibility of the career path and growth in this organization
• We need to create more opportunities for cross functional/cross location transfers and switching to the new roles should be faster
• Career growth is slow, in spite of expected performance
Higher than organization average
Lower than organization average
MO Corporate OMO CGPL MPL TPTCL
Sufficient opportunities to gain new skills 76% 75% 68% 67% 83% 68%
Someone provides valuable career guidance 64% 61% 60% 58% 76% 53%
Excellent opportunities for strong performers 64% 58% 60% 57% 75% 60%
Future career opportunities look good 59% 52% 55% 55% 74% 40%
21
People Practices to be Aligned in Order to Boost Perception on
Delivery on Promise and Decision Making
Delivery on
Promise*
Decision
Making
Career Opportunities
Senior Leadership
People/HR Practices
Senior Leadership
Work Processes
People/HR Practices
Factors determined basis RWA1 statistical technique
2014 2015 2016
2014 2015 2016
*Organization delivers on its promises made to employees
58% 59% 64%
56% 56% 61%
Focus on continuous improvement71% 71% 74%
Survey results will be acted upon57% 57% 62%
Decision making speed is in line with
changing needs50% 52% 57%
Indicates overall improvement area for Tata Power Consolidated
22
People Practices to be Aligned in Order to Boost Perception on
Delivery on Promise and Decision Making
2014 2015 2016
People/HR
Practices
Impacts are basis Aon model based on RWA analysis vis a vis Aon Best Employers benchmark
Employee Verbatim on what’s working well:
• Company policies are fairly good and keep getting updated
• HR function itself has evolved and brought better transparency in the processes
• Company policies are employee friendly, and one of the reasons for employees to stay in the firm
Employee Verbatim on what’s not working well:
• Policies at Tata Power should be applied consistently across units
• Policies around promotion and performance management need to be standardized and clear with a clear future view
• Employees highlight need for more action on the HR policies, beyond connect and formulation
• Some specific requests on policy changes associated to working hours and transfer
Delivery on
Promise
Decision
Making
Clear understanding of various HR
policies
49% 57% 61%
People/ HR practices create a positive
work environment
43% 47% 52%
48% 56% 60%
23
JM Exhibits Improved Perception on Engagement Behaviors Across
the Years, While Still Below Organization Average
88%84%
75%
59%
77%88%
82% 78%
61%
75%
94%
86%80%
68%
80%
TM SM MM JM FDA
2014 74 146 804 1806 87
2015 84 176 893 1763 122
2016 69 169 868 1707 118
AH BE India 2015 93% 87% 85% 83%
Tata Power
Conso.: 74%
Top Management
Senior Management
Middle Management
Junior Management
FDA
24
JM Exhibits Improved Perception on Engagement Behaviors Across
the Years, While Still Below Organization Average
88%84%
75%
59%
77%88%
82% 78%
61%
75%
94%
86%80%
68%
80%
TM SM MM JM FDA
2014 74 146 804 1806 87
2015 84 176 893 1763 122
2016 69 169 868 1707 118
AH BE India 2015 93% 87% 85% 83%
Tata Power
Conso.: 74%
What’s Working Well for JM
2014 2015 2016
Manager 59% 57% 72% (+15%)
Managing Performance 56% 57% 70%(+13%)
Career Opportunities 49% 47% 60%(+13%)
Collaboration 55% 55% 67%(+12%)
Top Management
Senior Management
Middle Management
Junior Management
FDA
25
JM Exhibits Improved Perception on Engagement Behaviors Across
the Years, While Still Below Organization Average
Top Management
Senior Management
Middle Management
Junior Management
FDA
88%84%
75%
59%
77%88%
82% 78%
61%
75%
94%
86%80%
68%
80%
TM SM MM JM FDA
2014 74 146 804 1806 87
2015 84 176 893 1763 122
2016 69 169 868 1707 118
AH BE India 2015 93% 87% 85% 83%
What Is Still Not Working for JM
2014 2015 2016
Delivery On Promise 52% 52% 58% (+6%)
Decision-Making 54% 52% 58% (+6%)
People/HR Practices 43% 50% 54% (+4%)
Recognition 46% 43% 53% (+10%)
Senior Leadership 52% 53% 58% (+5%)
Tata Power
Conso.: 74%
26
Need for Better Leadership Connect with JM
Inspire
Envision
Involve
62%
70%
73%
76%
78%
80%
79%
78%
83%
Open and honest incommunication
Encourage to challengestatus quo
Encourage sharing andimplementing new ideas
TM Ind TQ AH BE
83% NA 86%
83% 62% 85%
81% 66% NA
77% NA 84%
96% NA 86%
87% 58% 82%
84% NA NA
91% NA NA
88% NA NA
86% 68% 83%SM
MM
JM
60%
60%
64%
69%
70%
79%
74%
72%
82%
Consider employeesuggestions
Employees are valued asset
Visible and accessible 32%
27%
24%
55%
60%
59%
58%
66%
71%
71%
67%
63%
75%
74%
68%
Excite about future
Effective leadership
Clear future direction
Good business decisions25%
24%
22%
21%
18%
18%
24%
27
Marked Improvement in Middle Management Capability, Though
Employee Experience Continues to be Better with SM and TM
*Analysis includes managers with 5 or more reports responding to the survey
** Only includes responses from Direct reports
LevelReports to MM Reports to SM Reports to TM
2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016 2014 2015 2016
Number of Reports 1202 1286 1190 501 460 419 477 445 408
Number of Managers 122 139 143 56 58 49 51 49 38
Engagement Score 61% 65% 71% 68% 72% 76% 75% 80% 82%
Manager Index 4.34 4.27 4.7 4.54 4.67 4.91 4.85 5.02 5.13
Manager
My manager provides the support I need to succeed 59% 59% 74% 67% 71% 75% 76% 82% 83%
I receive appropriate recognition 48% 45% 56% 49% 54% 57% 56% 59% 66%
My manager cares about me as a person 65% 62% 77% 75% 74% 80% 80% 84% 87%
My manager treats people fairly 57% 55% 70% 64% 68% 76% 73% 81% 83%
My manager develops a positive team atmosphere 58% 56% 71% 66% 70% 74% 75% 79% 84%
Our work environment that is open 57% 56% 65% 60% 63% 71% 69% 75% 78%
Managing Performance & Careers
My manager sets clear expectations and goals with me 60% 59% 74% 69% 71% 78% 76% 82% 83%
I understand how my goals relate to the organization's 76% 78% 84% 84% 85% 86% 87% 92% 92%
My manager provides feedback to improve my performance 59% 59% 73% 67% 68% 77% 73% 80% 83%
My manager conducts fair and transparent appraisals 54% 53% 68% 60% 65% 74% 72% 79% 84%
I have someone who guides me about my career 53% 50% 61% 54% 55% 64% 61% 67% 70%
Customer Focus
My relationships with my customers are rewarding 70% 73% 79% 80% 79% 76% 82% 87% 85%
28
Engaged Employees Prove to be Better Managers
2014 2015 2016
Number of Managers 235 254 243
Number of Direct Reportees 2222 2246 2098
% of
Managers
Team
Score
% of
Managers
Team
Score
% of
Managers
Team
Score
Role model (5.5 - 6) 5% 94% 4% 90% 14% 95%
Good (5 - 5.5) 21% 86% 24% 88% 31% 84%
Needs minor development (4.5 - 5) 31% 71% 30% 74% 30% 71%
Needs development (3.5 - 4.5) 37% 55% 36% 59% 19% 60%
Needs significant development (<3.5) 5% 28% 7% 46% 6% 41%
*Analysis includes managers with 5 or more reports responding to the survey
** Only includes responses from Direct reports
Percentage of ‘Role Model’ and ‘Good’ Managers:
1%6%
24%
69%
ActivelyDisengaged
Passive ModeratelyEngaged
Highly EngagedManagers’ own Engagement Level:
Important to note that 22% of all managers have teams at 100% engagement
29
Team Engagement Levels on the Rise As Fewer Managers
Exhibit Need for Capability Development
2014 2015 2016
Number of Managers 235 254 243
Number of Direct Reportees 2222 2246 2098
% of
Managers
Team
Score
% of
Managers
Team
Score
% of
Managers
Team
Score
Role model (5.5 - 6) 5% 94% 4% 90% 14% 95%
Good (5 - 5.5) 21% 86% 24% 88% 31% 84%
Needs minor development (4.5 - 5) 31% 71% 30% 74% 30% 71%
Needs development (3.5 - 4.5) 37% 55% 36% 59% 19% 60%
Needs significant development (<3.5) 5% 28% 7% 46% 6% 41%
*Analysis includes managers with 5 or more reports responding to the survey
** Only includes responses from Direct reports
42% 43%
25%
2014 2015 2016
% of Managers who
need development
Grade 2014 2015 2016
MM 52% 53% 27%
SM 46% 40% 20%
TM 20% 14% 13%
% of Managers by Grade
who need development
30
73%
65%59% 57%
68%
81% 80%86%
74% 67% 67% 62% 68% 83% 82% 82%
90%
73% 71% 69%72%
80%86% 84%
Less than6 months
6 months- 1year
1- 2 years 2- 5 years 5- 10 years 10- 20 years 20- 30 years More than30 Years
Tata Power
Conso.: 74%
Relatively Less Tenured Employees Exhibit Comparatively Low
Engagement
2014 93 153 231 1196 610 174 325 139
2015 66 138 267 1102 834 172 288 172
2016 21 81 172 799 1252 189 256 171
+4%+4%+7%+4%+6%+16%
Engagement Score: 76%Engagement Score: 69%
69%61% 59%
72%
75%
67% 66%
78%
Communication WorkEnvironment
Work Processes Work Tasks
< 5 years
>= 5 years
Change in
Experience
After 5 Years:
-3% +2%
31
Engagement Levels Are Aligned With the Performance Ratings
63%
64%
69%
76%
65%
65%
74%
80%
72%
70%
72%
77%
76%
D
C
B
A
A+
2014 2015 2016
* * 53
856 806 597
963 1118 1240
664 588 618
126 116 106
A+ A B C D
Career Opportunities 70% 67% 61% 60% 68%
Learning & Development 75% 74% 69% 65% 72%
Managing Performance 86% 80% 72% 68% 75%
Recognition 64% 62% 54% 49% 53%
*Denotes less than 10 respondents
32
Employee Perception on Organizational Energy Varies Across Units
2016
Organizational
Energy
Employee Verbatim on what’s working well:
• Employee maintain high levels of energy and strive to deliver with full efficiency and potential
• Management remains positive in adverse situations and do the best for business
Employee Verbatim on what’s not working well:
• The organization needs to adapt faster to the changing environment
• Some processes are old and thus delay execution. Approach of action needs to be adopted rather than just compliance
• Some specific requests on policy changes associated to working hours and transfer
Tata Power MO Corporate OMO CGPL MPL TPTCL
Enthusiastic about the work I do 77% 78% 76% 73% 73% 85% 68%
Care about the future of the company 93% 93% 93% 90% 92% 96% 88%
Decisive action taken to solve problems 76% 78% 77% 71% 71% 80% 68%
Climate to share and implement new ideas
fostered77% 78% 76% 72% 75% 80% 65%
People constantly challenge the status quo 74% 76% 74% 67% 69% 80% 63%
People go beyond their call of duty to ensure the
success of company79% 82% 77% 76% 73% 83% 68%
79%
Higher than organization average
Lower than organization average
33
Suggested Way Forward
Leaders to inspire
and involve
1. Foster an open work environment to give a sense of inclusivity of the Junior
Management cadre and align them with the overall vision
2. Enable faster decision making regarding internal (delivery on promise) and
external situations (in line with the changing needs)
HR Support
1. Communication on various HR policies to increase awareness among
employees
2. Redefine / Revamp processes to enable faster execution and decision making
Managers
1. Continue with manager capability building initiatives through refresher programs for sustained engagement
2. Promote culture of accountability and reiterate it through recognizing desired
behaviors