FINANCING AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAINS Relevance of Indian Experience to Africa N. Srinivasan.
-
Upload
audrey-armstrong -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of FINANCING AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAINS Relevance of Indian Experience to Africa N. Srinivasan.
FINANCING AGRICULTURAL VALUE CHAINS Relevance of Indian Experience to AfricaN. Srinivasan
Indian agriculture
Cultivated area 160 million hectares Large population – demand and dependency Geo-climatic differences make for crop variety Shift from sustenance to enterprise farming Organised post production processes / marketing Numerous small farmers with low resource base Low productivity, incomes Limited capacity to invest in productivity enhancement Poor market access as marketable surplus is meager Access to finance improving, but a large number of
farmers are excluded
Agricultural finance – some numbers
Number of agricultural loan accounts: 75.6 mn Amount of credit balance March-12: $151 bn Proportion of short term loans: 55% Proportion of long term loans: 45% Credit to agro-processing units: $18.9 bn Credit to GDP ratio in agriculture: 37%
Institutional share of credit - $151.2 bn (%)
Commercial Banks
Cooperative Banks
Regional Rural Banks
Total
115.1 (76%) 20.5 (14%) 15.6 (10%) 151.2
Approaches to value chain financeDirectBank lends to farmerFarmer carries out production
Production sold to buyer
Price received by farmer used for repayment of loan to bank
Most loans are provided in this manner
IndirectBank lends to aggregator/buyer
Buyer/aggregator retails loan to farmer
Farmer carries out production
Production procured by buyer
Loan repaid to bank by buyer
Price net of loan paid to farmer
Contract farming usually has this approach – recent development
A third approach
Farmer is part of a value chain with contracted supply to buyer/aggregator
Banks gives loan to farmer against assurance by buyer that loan will be repaid by deduction from product value sold to them by farmer
Farmer’s produce procured by buyer Bank loans paid by buyer on behalf of farmer from
out or produce value Farmer paid price for produce net of loan payment by
buyer
Common in Sugar and milk value chains
Value chain Differences based on final markets
Domestic market based value chains Large demand Price sensitive market Ordinary quality
standards Focus on production,
less on processing and markets
Less capital intensive Low profitability and
hence low investments
Hesitant credit flow Specialised schemes
for focus on different crops, regions and aspects of farming
Export based value chains Competitive market Quality sensitive Non-tariff barriers in
the form of quality standards
Focus on grading, processing, packing
Capital intensive High profitability and
high investments needed
Special schemes for credit
Dedicated institutions for facilitation
Challenges
For producers High collateral
requirements Product unsuitability Complex
documentation Small ticket finance
not interesting to banks
High borrower transaction costs
Farmer collectives not readily acceptable to banks
For banks to finance High transaction and
risks costs in small agricultural loans
Market risks high in agricultural value chains
Seasonal and cyclical factors
Farmer collectives under-capitalised, lack professional management
Staff skills in value chain financing low
Difficulty in marketing innovative products
Producer members: 3.18 Mn
Milk handled 13.67 Mn lpd
Cooperative Dairy value chainGujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation
Cashew value chain
Tribal famers with poor quality lands Initial investment in plantations through a
project grant Farmers cooperatives aggregate members’
cashew and carry out processing Producer company investments in
processing, branding and marketing Producer company makes value-added
products
Cashew value chain – VAPCOL*
Number of farmer cooperatives
51
Number of participating farmers 15000 +
Value of sales of Cashew Rs 45 million
• Farmer Cooperatives own VAPCOL and hold its entire equity
• VAPCOL procures raw cashew and processed cashew from the farmers’ cooperatives
• Apart from the price paid, a patronage bonus and dividend on equity are also paid
Vasundhara Agri-Horti Producer Company Limited
Lessons from the cases
Small farmer livelihoods can be improved through value chains; easier to link farmers and banks in a value chain
Key role for farmers’ collectives Investments in processing Farmers collectives reduce risk perception of
banks, undertake repayment to banks from produce price
Farmers collectives retail loans to members with bulk loans from banks
Farmers’ collectives collect equity from members which is leveraged for investment in processing, storage and other infrastructure
Tripartite agreements where repayment is assured by crop procurer have been successful mechanisms of bank financing
African situation
Agriculture Very similar to India –
more work on financing, facilitating institutions and market development have taken place in India
Widely distributed small farms, low productivity, meager market surplus,
Market infrastructure weak and access to markets poor
Food insecurity persists in some geographies
Financial institution network in rural areas not strong – with exceptions
Not too many financial products in agriculture
Value chains Well organised value
chains very few Mostly in high value
crops with export markets
Many commodities exported raw, or with primary processing – higher end of value chain is not targeted in many commodities
Considerable potential to improve incomes of farmers through value chains
Productivity, quality and market orientation can bring in income addition to farms
High cost of credit, very few banks in small-loans market
What can be done
More attention to organising farmers in clusters – so that services and finance can be delivered easier
Bulking of volumes for inputs and outputs improve market access and strengthen negotiating power
Facilitating institutions to handhold farmer collectives – for both production effort and access to finance
Financial product development and increase in variety of products suitable for different value chains
Collateral substitution through trade instruments, implicit guarantees from aggregators, bulk financing of higher links of the chain for retailing to small farms – to be designed and widely adopted
Equity to be mobilised from farmers to bring down the risks perceived by banks, and increase farmer ownership of the value chain
What should be done
Policy focus to shift to outputs and markets Target Farm income through better
productivity and access to markets Support to creation of farmer collectives and
their stabilisation State support on common infrastructure,
PPPs on commercial infrastructure with long payback
Concerted effort on increasing banking network, skill sets in agri value chain financing
Design processes for sharing incomes equitably, with greater benefits to farmers
Thanks
Despite all our pretensions to knowledge and development, we owe our existence to a few inches of topsoil and the fact that it rains