Financial Treasurer’s Report · 2018-02-26 · Marine Barracks Washington, Bachelor Enlisted...

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 6B REGULAR MEETING

Hill Center at the Old Naval Hospital

921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE May 12, 2015, 7:00 p.m.

AGENDA

1. Adoption of Agenda (5 minutes) 2. Community Speakout (15 minutes) 3. Community & Commission Announcements (5 minutes) 4. Consent Agenda (5 minutes)

Minutes April 2015 Planning & Zoning Committee HPA #15-367, 732 7th Street SE, permit/raze, HPRB hearing—Thursday, May 28, 2015: Potomac

Electric Power Co., Michael Maxwell, & Adrienne Sheffield Alcohol Beverage & Control Committee ABRA-000437, Hayden’s, 700 North Carolina Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—Tuesday, May

26, 2015, ABC Board hearing – Monday, June 8, 2015 ABRA-000200, Chat’s Liquors, 503 8th Street SE, renewal, petition deadline—Tuesday, May 26,

2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 8, 2015 ABRA-081749, Capitol Hill Wine & Spirits, 323 Pennsylvania Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—

Monday, June 1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 ABRA-094605, World Wine and Spirits, 1453 Pennsylvania Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—

Monday, June 1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 ABRA-077335, Albert’s Liquors, 328 Kentucky Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—Monday, June

1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 ABRA-071312, Gandel’s Liquors, 211 Pennsylvania Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—Monday,

June 1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 ABRA-089418, Congressional Liquor, 404 1st Street SE, renewal, petition deadline—Monday, June

1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 5. Presentation (20 minutes)

MPD 1D Commander Jeff Brown 6. Appointment/Renewal of Resident Members (5 minutes)

Hill East Task Force: Amanda Thomas, 1401 Massachusetts Avenue SE (Jayaraman, 6B08) 7. Alcohol Beverage Control Committee

ABRA-025523, JJ Mutt Wine & Spirits, 643 Pennsylvania Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—

Monday, June 1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 (15 minutes) ABRA-009122, S&J Liquors, 1500 Massachusetts Ave SE, renewal, petition deadline—Monday,

June 1, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 15, 2015 (15 minutes)

ABRA-098700, Elaine’s One LLC, 715 8th Street SE, new CR license with sidewalk café endorsement, petition deadline—Monday, June 8, 2015, ABC Board hearing—Monday, June 22, 2015 (15 minutes)

8. Planning & Zoning Committee PS #10180160, Souk, 705 8th Street SE, new un-enclosed sidewalk café, PSC hearing—Thursday,

May 28, 2015: Winnette McIntosh Ambrose & Kelsey Evers (10 minutes) Marine Barracks Washington, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Draft Environmental Impact Statement,

comments deadline—Tuesday, May 26, 2015 (10 minutes) 9. Transportation Committee

Letter to DDOT and DDOE on Green Alley Designation for Freedom Way (5 minutes) 10. Financial (5 minutes)

Treasurer’s Report FY 2015 Second Quarter Report to DC Auditor

11. Eastern Market Community Advisory Committee Report (5 minutes) Hine Community Advisory Committee Report

12. Adjournment

PLEASE NOTE: Some items on this agenda will be considered on the consent agenda. An updated full agenda with items assigned to the consent agenda and regular agenda will be posted on Friday, May 8, 2015. At regular Commission meetings, any item may be removed from the consent agenda and placed on the regular agenda at the request of a single Commissioner. All ABC, BZA, Zoning, and Historic Preservation cases on the consent agenda will be fully discussed at the appropriate monthly committee meetings. Late-breaking ABC, BZA, Zoning, or Historic Preservation cases may be added to this agenda. For additional information, e-mail [email protected], or visit ANC 6B’s website: www.ancb6.org. Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 9, 2015.

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.ancb6.org/

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 6B REGULAR MEETING

Hill Center at the Old Naval Hospital 921 Pennsylvania Ave. SE April 20, 2015, 7:00pm

Meeting commences at 7:04pm, with all commissioners present.

1. Adoption of Agenda Chair Kirsten Oldenburg asks if there are any suggested changes to agenda. Flahaven – add comments to Chairman Mendelsohn’s FY 2016 proposal after Transportation Committee agenda, between #10 and #11. Krepp – asks if HSEMA briefing for ANC stricken? Oldenburg – Yes. Hoskins – add letter of support for Eastern Market Committee of 100 Oldenburg – suggest adding letter in EMCAC report section, item under 11. Burger – asks to remove public space case, Ugly Mug, withdrawn from review Oldenburg – add 2nd rule making, under PZ section. Flahaven motion to pass agenda as amended, 2nd Loots. 10-‐0 passed

2. Community Speakout Nancy Lyons -‐ DC Dept. of Public Works – Program: Mural DC – Request from 2 properties in ANC 6B to have mural painted, and is now in process to invite residents to comment. Properties requesting mural: 530 H SE, adjacent to Nooshi, 1003 H SE, Deli. Distributes handouts to ANC and audience. Oldenburg – Timing of process? Lyons – Within next 4 weeks. Robert White, Director of Community Outreach for Karl Racine, DC Attorney General – Community update. AG representative has been present at virtually every ANC meeting; establishing independence, submitted to council legislation. Hearing scheduled taking place on coming Wednesday. Submitted baseline budget of $55m. AG office will bring estimated 1 billion in revenue to DC treasury. Asking to expand programs to keep small portion of funds from consumer protection efforts. Juvenile Justice, Consumer Protection, Public Housing, Honest City Government. Have handouts. Email: [email protected], direct line 202-‐724-‐5487.

3. Community & Commission Announcements

Naomi Mitchell, Community Outreach Director for Councilman Charles Allen – Passes out flyer for Councilman Allen’s upcoming town hall on Thursday, May 7th, 6:30p – 8:30p, DCRA Conference Room 1100 4th Street SW Rm E-‐200. Loots – May 2nd, Hill Center, Capitol Hill Community Volunteer Day – Looking forward to good turnout. Projects going on throughout community. Krepp – Events DC official stated study of RFK will be released in next 30 days, made public commitment to hold meetings. Will be holding another public meeting. 50 thousand are expected for its RFK event on July 4th and given problems experienced during the recent Rock n Roll Marathon, neighbors have asked for discussion of mitigation plans for upcoming events on issues like adequate portable potties, etc. Burger – Councilmember Allen is holding his community office hours this Friday morning, 8-‐9am, at Curbside Cupcakes. Insight Development group – Buchanan School, Hill Center 7p. tomorrow night (Tuesday) community meeting. Oldenburg – Wednesday , open house style public meeting from 5:30-‐8:30p at Tyler Elementary on Marine Barracks Quarters Study, EIS published. Thursday eve, another open house/public meeting: 2nd meeting update on CSX 4:30p-‐7:30p, at Marriot Courtyard at New Jersey and I SE.

4. Consent Agenda

• March Minutes

Planning and Zoning Committee • HPA #15-‐282, 527 6th Street SE, concept/rear addition & deck, HPRB meeting – Thursday, April

23, 2015: John Helms & Kim Jones • HPA #15-‐305, 631 South Carolina Avenue SE, concept/rear addition, HPRB meeting – Thursday,

April 23, 2015: Marina Galvani & Jennifer Fowler • Second proposed rulemaking on proposal to adopt new Title 13 for sign regulations, comments

due to District Department of Transportation – Thursday, May 14, 2015 • Resolution regarding Pet Waste Removal Sign

Flahaven moves to approve consent agenda. Burger seconds. 10-‐0 passed. 5. Presentations

• Anacostia River Clean Up Update: Richard Jackson & Sharon Cooke, District Department of the Environment

Jackson/Cooke – Project determining contaminants in Anacostia River. Most comprehensive, thorough project ever been done re: Anacostia River. Proud and serious about project, determined to figure out what’s in river, and how to address it. Contact: [email protected], phone: 202-‐654-‐6017 Distributes handouts; fact sheet on current status: 9.2 miles coverage from Bladensburg to Potomac. Completed testing in December that begun in July of 2014. Collecting additional 150 samples from specific cites in River, will wrap that up on May 23rd. Once data received, will review, complete by June 2018. Dedicated funding stream, working with Maryland and other sources upstream; an agency wide project. Chao – any federal partnerships?

Jackson -‐ Had to get permits from Army Corp, and National Parks Service. This program is a part of Chesapeake Bay Watershed initiative. Krepp-‐ Will you be testing where the USS Barry has been moved and lodged, rusting? Jackson – Has not left, still there, so will be conducting testing. Krepp -‐ Have you notified coast guard captain of departure? Rust bucket – may stop you and won’t allow removal, and how will that impact sampling study? Jackson – Conversing with Navy; two different bodies at Navy working on this – Naval Facility. Samolyk– Young families starting to go to Yards Park, inlet, becoming huge trash collection. Who can you call to get that picked up? Jackson – Unsure, but not under my jurisdiction, can find out for you who best to call. Hoskins – To what extent are you looking beyond contaminants, e.g., storm water, other sources of pollutants? Jackson – Storm water, water quality people involved, want to expand on data. Primarily looking at sediment, but water quality from other tributaries can also contribute; will be studying those too. Hoskins – When you think of plan, what type of action? Just contaminant cleanup or broader? Jackson -‐ Comprehensive to clean, and prevent. Dredging, capping, for initial, then look at loading, to ensure reducing contamination. Question from audience – How do you punish those responsible for polluting? Jackson -‐ Type of sampling – analyzing, been in touch with all responsible parties, and have been involved in conversation. To be determined. But have been meeting w/ MD, Navy Yard, etc. 6. Election of Outreach & Constituent Services Task Force Chair Oldenburg – Nominates Commissioner Flahaven to Chair ANC Outreach & Constituent Service Task Force Flahaven accepts. Approved, 9-‐0. Krepp absent. 7. Appointment/Renewal of Resident Members Oldenburg – List of individuals are on the ANC Agenda: ABC Committee John Neal, 1360 G Street SE (Burger 6B06) Transportation Committee Michael Berger, 947 14th Street SE (Burger 6B06) Hill East Task Force Andrew Johnston, 1366 G Street SE (Burger 6B06)

Outreach & Constituent Services Task Force Jessica Kahan, 505 15th Street SE (Burger 6B06) Stpehen Merrill, 1002 D Street SE (Oldenburg 6B04) Loots – Wish to add Laura Jeffords 6b03, to Planning and Zoning and Transportation Committees Flahaven – Move that we approve slate of resident members, 2nd Burger, 10-‐0 approved 8. Alcohol Beverage Control Committee

• ABRA-‐002195, Safeway, 415 14th Street SE, renewal, petition deadline – May 11, 2015, ABC Board hearing – May 26, 2015

Oldenburg – Recognizes Chair ABC Committee, 6B08 Commissioner Jayaraman. Jayaraman – Drafted Settlement Agreement (SA) for Safeway, distributed to them, did not have ABC Cmte meeting, so we are discussing now at monthly ANC meeting. In handout distributed, a change 1st line, “renewal of”, and 3rd Whereas – regarding renewal of. Page 2, add under number 3, hours of operation and sales. Explanation: Safeway is currently open earlier, Sun-‐Sat 5a-‐Midnight for hours of establishment. Also added hours of alcohol sales, Sunday & Saturday 7a-‐ midnight. Checked with Harris Teeter, since they do not sell hard liquor but just beer and wine, their SA, permitted 7a-‐midnight as well, however, if we set a different time for Safeway, we should put Harris Teeter on same playing field. Oldenburg – is Safeway agreeable to SA? Jayaraman – Yes. Safeway Rep – Craig Muckle – Been on phone last week or two, correct statement from Jayaraman, appreciate support for SA. Janet Crowder, 6B Resident – When Safeway turned into premiere status, stacked wine next to groceries. Easily accessible. One can go to Safeway at 7a, can stock up but does not mean one would necessarily consume immediately after purchase. Change in floor plan, wine changes, for handy purchase. Safeway does not sell singles. Muckle – Safeway does not sell singles, and have enforcement mechanism in place. Most customers look to purchase out of convenience at 7a. Don’t think there are existing issues, so confident in safeguards and will take responsibility. Oldenburg – Self service checkout – who checks ID? Muckle: the attendant; what should happen, is that stop transaction occur, attendant look and ask for ID. Jayaraman – Moving wine and beer into grocery store, but liquor remains in dedicated section. Oldenburg – Did not ask ABRA for investigative report? Jayaraman-‐ Did not. Oldenburg – any issues? Muckle – not aware of it because I am the first contact to address issue with attorney and store manager.

Jayaraman – For new commissioners, ANC 6B has in the past, if establishment does not sign SA, voted to oppose renewal. Purpose is to retain ability to protest. If approved and assumption to sign, and it does not happen, we lose leverage of protest. Although currently for Safeway SA, Mr. Muckle cannot sign, and need to higher up to sign off. Flahaven – Current SA is stricter than one proposed, so there’s encouragement for Safeway to ultimately sign. Jayaraman– Move to send letter to ABC Board in support of Safeway’s application to renew liquor license -‐ ABRA 002195 Samolyk 2nd, 10-‐0 passed.

9. Planning & Zoning Committee

• BZA #18938, 325 5th Street SE, pursuant to 11 DCMR § 3104.1 for special exception under § 223, not meeting lot occupancy requirements under § 403.2, open court requirements under § 406.1, & non-‐conforming structure under § 2001.3 to allow construction of two-‐story rear addition to existing single-‐family dwelling in CAP/R-‐4 District, BZA hearing – Tuesday, April 21, 2015: Gina Eppolito & Jennifer Fowler (15 minutes)

Hoskins – Over past several weeks, had number of conversation with all parties, to knowledge, no agreement to date. The neighbors at 323 opposing to substantial reduction of light in backyard. It is important to note sun study is less than adequate of actual impact on property, because it shows just 4 foot addition, not 10 foot addition. Will stop and listen from applicant to receive update. Fowler – OP has supported the proposal, on the record. Learned from Hoskins yesterday neighbors requesting changes, to eliminate window. Because the addition is modest, not willing to reduce footprint but can consider removal of window. No additional information since PZ Cmte. Hoskins – Question outstanding whether or not applicant can build or modernize existing porch by right. OP was unable to give determination; up to Zoning Administrator. Currently it is an open porch, not screened in. Final comment is that I am very sensitive to fact that Eppolito has already delayed this for several months at same time also sensitive to fact that Flynn and Shelton feel will have substantial impact to property. Fowler – Confident can tear down and rebuild to same footprint. Attorney Bailey – Representing neighbors Flynn and Shelton. Presents two items – 1 picture of current condition. Second item, showing computer rendering of footprint with windows on side. Wish to address two issues: 1. Matter of right 2. Sun study. Robert Shelton – Only thing before ANC is special exemption based on rules. Because it is non conforming property. Is a provision 2003, which deals with existing non conforming, grandfathered pre-‐1958 structures. It says if you have a rebuilt, you cannot extend footprint. What we have here is attempt to meld two concepts. The language is not in front of ANC. It has been presented to BZA 6 days ago. How far does two story masonry extend from rear? In initial filing, applicant said 17 feet. Upon revisit, re-‐measure, on March 28th, determined it is 12 feet. Correction was made 6 days ago in filing before BZA. Correction was not before last week’s ANC Planning Zoning Committee. Fowler – Measure has been corrected and filed before BZA. It is a modernization, can build as 2 story enclosed structure. Are only asking for additional 3 percent. Change may look more extreme.

Eppolito – Re: Sun study Shelton provided for this evening’s meeting. There is an incorrect presence of where the lower wall would end. There was no specific time on whatever sun study Shelton provided to time of day, year, where the shadow was. Ms. Fowler’s presentation was done with specific time, unlike Shelton’s sun study. Shelton – Filed with BZA, 3:40p in the afternoon. Hoskins – Clarifies it is not sun study, just a shadow photo. Sun study by Ms. Fowler shows 4 feet of change not 10 feet of change, thus it is not accurate. Chao – Has anyone contacted the Zoning Administrator or his staff to confirm proposed project is allowable? Fowler – No, but have done several projects where have been allowed to build, under grandfather clause. Oldenburg – Do we have a motion? Oldenburg – Move that ANC support the case. No need for second. All in favor of motion to support case – Burger, Hagedorn, Loots, Flahaven, Krepp, Oldenburg Abstain – Samolyk, Hoskins, Jayaraman, Chao 6-‐0-‐4, motion passed.

• BZA #18992, 1015 E Street SE, pursuant to 11 DCMR § 3103.2, for variances from side yard requirements under § 775.5 & nonconforming structure requirements under § 2001.3(b)(2) to allow renovation & expansion of existing building to create five-‐unit apartment building in CHC/C-‐2-‐A District, BZA hearing – Tuesday, May 5, 2015: Congressional 1015 E Street, LLC, Brian Athey, Jamey Creasy, & Cary Kadlecek (15 minutes)

Brian Athey – Update since last week’s PZ Cmte Meeting: Attempted to meet with neighbors, reached out to neighbors offer to conduct aesthetic work to address concern. Issue is variance, supported by HPRB. 1013 E Street owner is myself, thus in favor. Confusion on variance test, whether it was met to standard at prior PZ Cmte. Apologizes for contributing to confusion. Cary Kadlecek – Variance standards have been heard. Property to west would be impacted by non conforming side yard. Building to property line is a condition to be allowed in this zone. Light and air is not considered in the code. Regardless of size of side yard on western side, wall on eastern side, is essentially the same. We are not insensitive to aesthetics of the wall. That was a design discussion that happened in front of HPRB. Zoning does not care about studies, only whether the project fits in to the box. Concerns of neighbors are legitimate but not germane to law code. Shadow study shows there is no impact. Oldenburg – Question for Brian Athey. If BZA says no, you cannot have variance, what can you do by right? Athey: Eastern side would not be changed, I would build by right, but could close court altogether.

Krepp – Question for Kadlecek. Told us how we should feel and what HPRB said, please tell us what the case law is, what policy was, when was it established. Do not tell me what I’m thinking unless you provide documentation or background to back up your stance Athey -‐ Regulation set up in 1958, can’t recite history of zoning commission in 1958. Don’t know history behind it. We know what regulation says. If it allows this box, clearly those who adopted law in 1958 have considered how the neighborhood should be developed. Allowance of building over side yard… Can give you BZA cases of side yard relief, have looked at just the side of the property. Krepp – Are there any cases on point that looks like this. Jayaraman – Describes photo and appearance of project’s impact to neighbors. Asks applicant: If you lived in this house and your views went from this (before photo) to this (after photo) are you okay? Personally? Athey: Yes. Oldenburg -‐ Talking about case law, now personal opinion. Jayaraman was not recognized. Jayaraman – The applicant’s attorney said we can’t consider what’s on the other side. Sure we can, we have to, that is what we were elected to do; it’s our job. To say it is not germane, you can say that, but we were elected to represent citizens of our community and take a stand where something does not make sense and this project does not make sense. Kadlecek – Can cite two cases from BZA – 17139 and 17270. Mr. Rhodes – To say the issue is re: aesthetic is patently false, it is about our air and light. Our air and light study show we will be deprived. Please re-‐examine picture in this light. Concerned that the new existing wall will be so hot, will be living in solar oven, the neighbors will be deprived of light and will feel the heat from the sun onto the structure. In evenings on hot days, the hot air from building rises and cooler air from alleys come through to provide relief. If he puts this next to our houses, we will be driven from them by heat, lack of light, by unbelievable monstrosity by this enterprise. Michael Ford -‐ Variance test is stricter than special exemption test. Total impact of variance must be considered. It is the entire thing. Passes out photographs for ANC members. Describes shadow study, for March, July, October, December. On sun study, have windows and doors. Light red building is mine. In March, I will lose light coming in from kitchen window. Expands on other months, and how much light through window is lost for neighbor and self. There’s no way to illustrate lack of air except this is 24 feet high. We have study coming, including heat on wall. It is taking time to calculate the loss of value to the property as well. Do not yet have hard figure. One developer on 11th looked and came by, examined, said when sunset disappeared value will tumble. Oldenburg – who did study? Ford – I did. I was in the Navy and a navigator and own video production company, and have skills. I can assure you these are right. Will be happy to go into differences with applicant’s study. Oldenburg – I believe developer said that if this case goes away, someone else can come in and build by right.

Argument occurs between two opposing presenters; Chair Oldenburg calls meeting to order, due to exchange between applicant and Mr. Ford overlapping. Oldenburg – Wish to understand the difference between the sun studies. Janet Crowder – owner of 507 11th SE. Have owned property since 2001, have always had gate to go and access maintenance from rear of building. Have always have access to the back. Now the plans will overlap and take away access and don’t know what would happen to existing pipe and drain. Oldenburg – Mr. Athey would you provide Ms. Crowder with access to rear of property? Athey: yes. Crowder – But current plans would box me in, how would it be possible? Oldenburg – That would apply during the building permit. Rosslyn Knapp – Owner 1011 E Street SE. Share concerns raised re: light, air flow, sight line, impact and impact on cooling/heating of house. Although not as dramatic, there would be impact on my property. Carnie Hayes – I and husband Charles Crain live at 516 10th SE. We share, with our neighbors all the way around the block, this one entrance alley. There are no exits for emergency vehicles. When we first bought the house in 1993, the garbage trucks used to pick up back there. Now only smallest emergency vehicles can get back there. This case is about the community and the points being made about the air and access in the alley. It is very much about the alley. There is no way they can do any of this without digging under, bringing disruptions to neighbors, bringing vehicles into the alley. The real point is to validate, as somewhat of an expert of the role of the sun, Mr. Ford and his study on the sun. Our house at 516 use natural heating methods. Have 4 fireplaces. My life depends, as I have rare genetic condition, very rare. Two of the manifestation is that I die without the sun, literally. Seasonably impact. Lighting is my life because the same gene can be offset by vitamin D. All the research coming out, scientific, means people with severe Vitamin D deficiency are able to reverse condition with sun. Oldenburg – Ms. Hayes’ two minutes are up. Thank you very much. Carnie Hayes – I’m telling you I will die by the cacophony. Oldenburg – Construction issue is not yet germane. BZA will not consider it, and Chairman of BZA will say it is not in his purview. I really do not see how this building will impact you half way down on 10th. Michael Beck– property purchased at 10 percent assessment value and is 15 percent below next year’s assessment value. Ford – Would be happy to explain the light study and can offer to clarify. Oldenburg – you got 45 seconds. Ford – 8am, is irrelevant because the sun does not affect back walls, it doesn’t start impact until 1p. If you look at E Street, there are details, their sun study does not include windows or doors in the rear however. Our camera position is parallel to sun path east to west. Their study is to the north; so that does not tell you diddly. Oldenburg – Motion from the Committee is to oppose the application.

Flahaven – Would offer amendment in nature of substitute to strike opposition and support. Understand frustration, with neighbors, has nothing to do with east wall, if the case went down east wall, issues would stay the same. There was a proposal we saw earlier on that was better and we voted to support, the neighbors opposed. It is pretty clear that the neighbors don’t want this addition at all. What is in front is whether we should grant variance. Loots 2nd. Oldenburg – Any discussions? Krepp– I would be opposing. I read through BZA cases, and am not confident in motion. Support: Flahaven, Loots, Burger, Oppose: Hoskins, Krepp, Hagedorn, Samolyk, Jayaraman Abstain: Chao, Oldenburg Motion Failed 3-‐5-‐2 Oldenburg – Move we take no position on the application due to impact of 2 story wall. Do I have a second? No seconds. Motion fails. Loots – I wanted to underscore with all due respect to Commissioner Jayaraman’s notion we were elected to protect and support the neighbors. I have great respect for neighbors and impact on property. I would be just as upset if it were me. We as a commission need to be very careful in recognizing our statutory charge. We are asked to opine on side yard on west side, not height, mass, light issues. That is the only thing we weigh in on. I cannot in good conscience oppose this project on the basis of damage of that side yard, is going to do upon the neighbors. When you combine C2A district, with 100 percent lot occupancy, you run the risk. Even though the issue is very real to opposing neighbors, I respect and sympathize. I don’t think we have the authority to justifiably oppose it. Oldenburg – Motion I made was while ANC could support core variance, it takes no position on application because of impact of 2 story wall on rear impact of two abutting properties. Loots I suggest we take no position. Oldenburg -‐ I move that we take no position. Flahaven – The motion has to be offered by someone else. Loots – I move that we take no position on this application. 2nd Oldenburg, In Favor: Loots, Flahaven, Hagedorn, Oldenburg, Burger, Hoskins Oppose: Samolyk, Jayaraman, Krepp Abstain – Chao Motion is passed, 6-‐3-‐1

• BZA #18994, 254 15th Street SE, pursuant to 11 DCMR § 3103.2, variance from the off-‐street

parking requirements under § 2101.1 to allow conversion of existing one-‐family dwelling into five-‐unit apartment building in C-‐2-‐A District, BZA hearing – Tuesday, May 5, 2015: Rahmin Mehdizadeh, Hun Ah Lee, & Martin Sullivan (15 minutes)

Mehdizadeh -‐ Sent letters, knocked on doors, could not reach neighbors. Sent three letters to 250, 256 15th; as well as five other addresses. Offered neighbors access to rear property; no response. Jayaraman – did you speak to the neighbors across the street at all? Mehdizadeh: No. Jayaraman – Describes neighbors reached out to, and named those who opposed. This is really a pop up, a finger in the middle of the block. Every other house, 6 on one side, 8 on other, are the same. Developer wants to put two stories. Neighbors also complain of lack of parking which is germane to applicant. We have extreme difficulty parking on our own street. Mehdizadeh –I’ve been there ten times, it has been very easy for me to park there. I don’t see the problem or issue. Jayaraman – With all due respect I walk that alley, through Kings Court, there are some people who park in the alley, but much of those houses, don’t have alley parking and residents do park on the street. Two apartment buildings on corner at 15th and C have no parking. Curbside café does not have parking. Mehdizadeh – It is a matter of right. I can build by right. Oldenburg any discussion of no RPP? Jayaraman – Not yet. I’ve spoken with neighbors from across the street. Mehdizadeh – I sent two letters and drawings out on April 9th. Marty Sullivan, Counsel – on RPP we expect BZA to do that. Loots -‐ How many units? Parking? Mehdizadeh – We are two shy, and need two credits. 5 units to be built. Hoskins – Is this considered high transit access center? Jayaraman – No. There is only one bus stop at 15th South Carolina, Independence & Mass. Oldenburg -‐ Are we close to a motion? Krepp – You knocked on doors when no one was home. Mehdizadeh– I attempted once. Krepp – My concern is that you did this in middle of spring break week. Many don’t answer the door.

Flahaven –Move we support this. This is clearly going to pass. Clearly will make variance pass. No way car will get on property. I offer motion with full restriction on RPP. Hoskins – I have had concerns that we are limiting development due to parking. Decoupling development choices from parking is really important. Parking is common good, shared benefit. Samolyk – Friendly amendment to strike O RPP codify. Does not appear to be any neighbors present to speak against. Support – Flahaven, Loots, Hagedorn, Samolyk, Oldenburg, Burger, Hoskins Oppose -‐ Krepp, Jayaraman, Chao Motion Passed: 7-‐3 Motion to support BZA application on this property. Flahaven -‐ Respond to Councilmember Orange legislation, as someone who supported amending to reduce R-‐4 height, I think Councilmember Orange’s motion is absurd. To take a 5-‐unit building to make a monstrosity. On motion to support application Support – Flahaven, Loots, Hagedorn, Samolyk, Oldenburg, Burger, Hoskins Oppose – Chao, Jayaraman, Krepp Motion passed 7-‐3

• BZA #18997, 148 11th Street SE, pursuant to 11 DCMR § 3104.1, special exception under §

223, not meeting lot occupancy requirements under § 403.2 & rear yard requirements under § 404.1 to allow construction of two-‐story rear addition with accessory apartment connected to dwelling by covered walkway in R-‐4 District, BZA hearing – Tuesday, May 12, 2015: Chris Lobb, Paola Barbara, & Jennifer Fowler

Fowler – Been working, pretty close to coming to agreement, including height. Back and forth re: window placement. Double window in bedroom to allow more light. Wanted to get everyone’s feedback. Took the middle tall window to shift it south, to ensure no visibility to and from window. Wolf – pleased to see plan to shift placement of windows. But very unhappy. I did not get copy of this material until yesterday afternoon. In terms of privacy this is not all appropriate. Shows pictures of existing property, double window will look directly into my house. I think more needs to be worked out. If we had other situation with one window on right, two high windows, I would agree. But I cannot accept two large windows looking into my house. Paola Barbara – Presents renderings of newly drawn plan of double window v. single window. Point is that original plan does not impact much of neighbor’s property. Oldenburg – I believe distance between two windows is relevant and am disappointed and know CHRS is not going to like this plan. Samolyk – Support neighbors, plan as is, feel that neighbors have been accommodating to Ms. Wolf. Flahaven – Unfortunate that compromise fell apart, applicant has made sacrifice, took two feet off original plan, reduced one window to smaller window. There needs to be compromise on both sides.

Richard Webbey – Son in law, to Ms. Wolf. You asked what has changed since last meeting. What has changed is we went back and forth amicably, as of yesterday evening we were sent new drawings. The new plans yesterday at 4p were received. Today at 5p, we received a new plan. Now we just were shown a 3rd new plan. When do we have time to consider the plans? We are really close to compromise. We were at that point, it’s moved away; can we have more time? Oldenburg – BZA considering on May 12th, before our next monthly meeting. Webbey – Can you take no position to allow continued dialogue? Oldenburg – Will take into consideration. Chris Lobb – the plan seen in front of you was sent Sunday. The two short windows plan was not agreed to before. Hagedorn – Move we take no position, 2nd Jayaraman. Hoskins – Question – what plans are precisely filed with BZA? Fowler – Clarifies, presents drawings to be filed in front of BZA. Hoskins – Would like to specify which plans were approved to have distinction. Fowler – Height has been filed, we are down to window placement. 20 foot was filed; not changing. Discussion is on window. On Hagedorn motion to take no position: Support: Hagedorn, Jayaraman, Chao Oppose: Oldenburg, Burger, Flahaven, Samolyk, Loots, Hoskins, Krepp Motion failed 3-‐7 Flahaven – Move to support application based on revised plans viewed on 4/20/2015 meeting in ANC 6B 2nd Samolyk Support: Flahaven, Oldenburg, Samolyk, Loots, Hoskins, Burger Oppose: Hagedorn, Chao, Krepp Abstain – Jayaraman Motion approved 6-‐3-‐1

• PS #104198, 1300 South Carolina Avenue SE, install building projection, PSC hearing – Thursday, April 23, 2015: James Olsen & Jennifer Fowler

Burger motion to support applicant, 10-‐0 approved.

• Letter regarding 2015 Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon & Half Marathon Krepp moved that ANC support the letter, 2nd Samolyk. 10-‐0 approved.

• ZC #14-‐13, text amendment – rooftop penthouse regulations for all non-‐low density residential development, ZC hearing – Thursday, April 30, 2015

Motion from Committee to support, 10-‐0 approved. 10. Transportation Committee

• Proposed comment on 2nd Proposed Rulemaking on Use of US Reservation Transfer to DC; on Ensuring Trangle Parks are Preserved for Public Use.

Oldenburg motion to support sending letter to DDOT, 2nd Krepp, 10-‐0 approved.

• Letter to District Department of Transportation regarding lack of funding for ANC 6B’s 2014 Performance Parking Zone project awards

Oldenburg -‐ Move support sending letter in response to rulemaking 10-‐0, approved 10. Letter on FY 16 Budget to DC Council Chairman Mendelson. Flahaven -‐ Want to ensure this letter goes to Council and copy Mayor. Lot of things we liked are mentioned in the letter. Main concern remain issues on school modernization. Solicit feedback on language regarding additional funding for new soccer stadium but lack of funds for school modernization. Krepp – We should not rescind verbiage on soccer stadium, priorities – soccer v. children Chao – Concur with Krepp and Flahaven on priorities and support existing language re: soccer stadium. Samolyk – We have a soccer community and have concerns about language. Loots – Language does not oppose soccer and soccer stadium. Flahaven – move to support letter, 2nd Jayaraman. 10-‐0 approved. 11. Eastern Market Community Advisory Committee Report (5 minutes) with letter in support for Vision award letter. Hoskins – Re: Report -‐ biggest thing to share from EMCAC group, is subcmte on marketing has ongoing business that is exciting. Working to positioning the market for success in the future. Chuck Burger is leading the effort. Market manager has been conducting research on parking, when Hine parking lot becomes available. Nothing is signed and sealed, but there have been conversations between nearby garages and have scouted up to 200 spots for new paid parking. Lack of information from market manager on budget from the market is a big issue. EMCAC has been asking for details on budget, but DGS won’t provide final financial figures for past fiscal year, which is appalling. EMCAC has not received final figures. Hoskins – Re: letter EMCAC Nomination for 2015 Vision Award. Move ANC support letter, 2nd Hagedorn.10-‐0 approved.

12. Hine Community Advisory Committee Report NEW Hine update Hoskins -‐ Demo will begin soon. Hotline number has been established. And is in report. Traffic control plans for excavation phase has been approved. Raze is nearing. They have included all the possible routes to transport materials. 13. Financial Matters (5 minutes)

• Treasurer’s report

Hoskins -‐ Submitted detailed expenditures listing with current budget to date Jayaraman– Questions item 23 Hoskins -‐ It is for Fagon community guide.

• Revised fiscal year 2015 budget Hoskins -‐ Move we adopt FY 2015 budget as requested. Oldenburg -‐ Question on revised budget-‐ landline. We don’t have a land line. Hoskins – I bolded changes, I should have asteriked it; it was adopted in the March 2015 meeting. Bolded number we are actually changing. Burger 2nd Burger offers friendly amendment to Hoskins motion to up budget for printing and copying budget by 50 dollars. 9-‐0 approved budget as amended (Flahaven absent) 14. Adjournment Jayaraman motion to adjourn and reconvene on Tuesday May 12th 7pm.

May 11, 2015 TO: ANC 6B FR: Brian Flahaven RE: Resident Member for May 12, 2015 Agenda The following resident member was submitted for consideration on the May 12 meeting agenda. Hill East Task Force

Amanda Thomas (Jayaraman 6B08) 1401 Massachusetts Avenue SE [email protected] Amanda Thomas is a project manager at DTZ working on DTZ’s corporate real estate projects as well as tenant development projects. Previously, she worked as a project manager and project architect for 8½ years in Gensler’s Houston and Washington, DC offices. She is a licensed architect, LEED accredited professional (LEED AP BD+C), and construction document technologist (CDT). As a resident of the ANC 6B neighborhood, she looks forward to addressing development issues facing Hill East.


1

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 6B Alcohol Beverage Control Committee Meeting

Hill Center at the Old Naval Hospital

921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Room 209 May 7, 2015, 7:00 p.m.

REPORT

Present: Commissioners Jayaraman, Samolyk, Oldenburg, Loots, Krepp, Hoskins, Hagedorn, Flahaven, Chao, Burger

Resident Members: Iannacchione and Palace. Amended Agenda adopted (cased reordered). Pass 12-0 1. Sarah Fashbaugh Presentation

Ms. Fashbaugh described the role of ABRA and the process for new licenses. Hotline #: 202-329-6347. She stated that the ABRA Board is has 7-members appointed by the Mayor with consultation and recommendations from the DC Council. She shared that there are a limited number of licenses and rules against how close one can be to schools, libraries, etc. She also stated that some of the reasons to protest an applicant are peace, order and quiet, impact on real property values, proximity to schools, libraries, etc. She stated that while the board does give great weight to ANCs the ABC Board does make the final decision.

She shared a number of points about the sale of singles:

The moratorium on single sales in Ward 6;

The process for requesting a single sale exception;

Only a class A liquor store can apply; o Explained classes (Is large grocery stores, class B & cannot sell liquor or class A) o Can’t have 2 class A license (wholesale vs. retail) o Wholesale class A license have to have a warehouse (Hayden’s has both wholesale & Retail)

Seven-Eleven (class B license cannot sell liquor); if they sell liquor, must be a class A.

ANC would be notified;

ANC would have 60 days to file a resolution

ANC can limit sales of singles (70 oz. or less) in a settlement agreement; Need more info and concerns:

What happens to the single sale exception in the case of a change in ownership?

Not required to placard if the license is sold or transferred to a new owner at same location.

Can the ANC request that a single sale exception be withdrawn or revoked?

There was some concern about loop holes for Wholesale Class A licenses and single sales o ANC don’t get notified; o Don’t need to placard o Can’t be protested

Commissioners will work on a letter to DC Council about closing the loophole and providing the community input through the ANC.

2

2. Liquor License Renewals

ABRA-000437, Hayden's Liquor, 700 North Carolina Ave SE (Hoskins)

Tom owner. Well established store. Has never had a violation well known in the community and appreciate his business. Community concerns: peeling paint; maintenance of the façade (disrepair of the building); parking of motorcycles, boats, other vehicles on public space. Owner has agreed to make improvements to the physical façade of the building and move vehicles onto driveway on the property.

Motion Hoskins (Oldenburg second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application, contingent upon receipt of a signed Settlement Agreement (SA), and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0

ABRA-081749, Capitol Hill Wine & Spirits, 323 Pennsylvania Ave SE (Samolyk)

Ms. Savitha owner. Prepared to sign a settlement agreement. Applicant does have a single sale exception (need to revise SA so to note that they have exception.

Motion Samolyk (Oldenburg second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application, contingent upon receipt of a signed Settlement Agreement (SA), and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0

ABRA-094605, World Wine and Spirits, 1453 Pennsylvania Ave SE (Burger)

Richard Lee, owner. Signed SA in 2013. Have not had any complaints from nearby neighbors. Applicant does have a single sale exception.

Motion Burger (Chao second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0

ABRA-077335, Albert's Liquors, 328 Kentucky Ave SE (Burger)

George Ventura owner. No violations in investigative reports. Commissioner plans to remove clause stating that the applicant will “engage with the ANC” and add supersede clause.

Motion Burger (Samolyk second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application, contingent upon receipt of a signed Settlement Agreement (SA), and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 11-0

ABRA-071312, Gandel's Liquors, 211 Pennsylvania Ave SE (Samolyk)

Mr. Raj—has discussed SA. Applicant does have a single sale exception. Commissioner has not received anything negative from community.

Motion Samolyk (Loots second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application, contingent upon receipt of a signed Settlement Agreement (SA), and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0

ABRA-089418, Congressional Liquor, 404 1st Street, SE (Samolyk)

Met with owner; does not sell singles and no exception; has signed a SA. No complaints or concerns from neighbors.

3

Motion Samolyk (Burger second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0.

ABRA-000200, Chat's Liquors, 503 8th Street SE (Loots)

Second generation family owned business (37 years at that location); Not seen an issue and no community concerns. Need to add supersede clause.

Motion Loots (Hoskins second): Recommend that the ANC support the renewal application, contingent upon receipt of a signed Settlement Agreement (SA), and place it on the consent agenda. Pass 12-0

ABRA-025523, JJ Mutt Wine & Spirits, 643 Pennsylvania Ave, SE (Hoskins)

Commissioner had conversation. Has single sale exception. No violations but community members e-mailed AB C to share their observance of public drunkenness, urination and their perceived correlation that the singles were from this applicant. Commissioner has heard from a number of neighbors and building owner about the sale of singles. CVS has created a space for people to buy singles and consume alcohol in public leading to public intoxication.

Eliminating the sale of singles would have a large impact on business. 30-33 % of sales are singles. Applicant believes that many who buy singles are taking them home. Discussion surrounded what the ANC could include in the SA to address the issue without removing the exception. Video surveillance inside and in the alley not. Kirsten—we need to move carefully. The problem may or may not be from this one establishment as other stores on Pennsylvania Ave also has exception. Might be a good point to raise with Commander Brown.

Commissioner Jayaraman asked if applicant would be amenable to using a clear bag and NOT white or black. The applicant agreed to use clear bags. A clear bag may dissuade people from consuming alcohol around the area of Eastern Market plaza & in front of the SE Library. Committee chair asked other commissioners to incorporate this language into their SAs.

Motion Hoskins (Samolyk second): The ABC Committee took no position on the renewal application to address remaining issues. Pass 12-0.

ABRA-009122, S & J Liquors, 1500 Massachusetts Avenue SE (Krepp)

Applicant does not want language that prevents them from selling 2 and 3 packs. ANC 6B protested this the last time and the board sided with the applicant. So, we need to take out at language. Concern is the transfer of the liquor license from S&J to 7-Eleven. Cannot include language in SA prohibiting transfer or sale of license. Commissioner Loots shared that it is considerably easier and cheaper to transfer a license than apply for a new one. Neither S&J nor 7-Eleven have engaged in a conversation with Commissioner Krepp. Has been to speak with applicant 4 times. Commissioner Chao told applicant that they need to meet with commissioner prior to full ANC meeting.

Motion Krepp (Flahaven second): The ABC Committee took no position on the renewal application to address remaining issues. Pass 12-0.

3. New Application for a CR License(30 min)

ABRA-098700, Elaine’s One LLC, 715 8th Street, SE (Loots)

4

Arron Silverman—40 seat restaurant (fine dining, reservation only; open 4 nights only; special occasion restaurant. No bar but bar seating. 2 seatings a night at the most. Reached out to neighbors, neighborhood via community advocate. Indoor garbage planned. Concrete sealed pad with a drain, water bib and grease storage and 2 steel fire doors that swing out. Community advocate, Linda Elliott, provided pictures of the current state of the alley and the trash area of sister restaurant. Packet also included current best practices including storage of grease within the kitchen in a roll away unit and compared current plans and presented other recommendations. Applicant states that they have reached out to community and has included interior trash storage in plans. Concerns were that the storage area was too small and too narrow to reduce or eliminate food and grease that attracts rats and other vermin. Applicant admits that rats and vermin are a huge problem in the neighborhood but it is endemic to the entire area not just behind their restaurant. Applicant stated that once construction begins, they would know how much more space would be available and would ensure that any additional space identified would be dedicated to expanding the trash storage area. Commissioner commended applicant for engaging the neighborhood; had met with applicant and neighborhood. Size of the restaurant will limit the amount of refuse. Applicant also intends to have daily trash and recycling pick up as with the sister restaurant. Another commissioner expressed support for the applicant’s efforts. Additional discussion focused on whether there was enough room for staff to reach trash cans without having to open the exterior fire doors. Commissioner concerned about micromanaging how the applicant will meet the commitment to indoor trash storage. Commissioners shared their views that they want the applicant to succeed with indoor trash storage and want the applicant to be the leader in addressing neighbor’s concerns and reducing the availability of a food source for rats and vermin. Commissioners discussed language that would achieve the goal but not micromanage how. Commissioner asked applicant to ensure that the trash storage area have enough room to allow staff to reach all trash cans without the need to open the outside trash doors. Include language that requires the applicant to build and maintain a functional trash storage area. Also, add a best effort clause that is not a mandate but strongly encourages the use of best practices. Will specify indoor grease storage that may allow applicant to store bottles and recyclables as well. Motion Loots with friendly amendment from Hoskins (Krepp second): Recommend support of a new CR License application pending execution of a signed settlement agreement that includes a stipulation requiring applicant to construct, maintain, and exclusively utilize interior space to store grease and non-recyclable trash, and to prohibit the opening of exterior doors during disposal of trash and grease. Additionally, the applicant shall utilize best efforts to store grease in the kitchen and move recycling to the interior space if possible. Pass 7-0.

Elaine's One LLC Page 1 of 3 Settlement Agreement ANC6B03 Draft for Consideration 05/12/2015

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD COMMISSION 6B

and Elaine's One, LLC

d/b/a To Be Determined

Pursuant to this Settlement Agreement, (“Agreement”), by and between Elaine's One, LLC (“Applicant”) and Advisory Neighborhood Commission 6B (“ANC6B”), effective as of the date of its adoption by ANC6B, the parties hereto hereby agree to be legally bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, superseding and replacing all previous agreements with respect to Applicant as it relates to its application for a Class “CR” License (ABRA-098700), with Sidewalk Cafe endorsement (“License”), now pending before the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Regulatory Administration (“ABRA”), for conduct of business located at 715-8th Street SE, Washington DC 20003 (“Premises”). WHEREAS Applicant has applied before ABRA to effect, and is seeking its approval of, a new License for the Premises; and WHEREAS Applicant and ANC6B wish to voluntarily and mutually memorialize the terms and conditions upon which ANC6B has agreed to support the Applicant's License, pursuant to the provisions of D.C. Code § 25-446, for the operation and maintenance of Applicant’s business in such a manner as to further promote the security, sanitation, peace, order and quiet of the neighborhood in a manner that ANC6B deems to be in the best interests of the neighborhood; and

WHEREAS ANC6B hereby supports the Applicant's License upon the agreement of Applicant to execute and abide by the terms and conditions hereof;

It is THEREFORE AGREED AND RESOLVED as follows:

1. Recitals Incorporated. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Nature of the Business. The Applicant will manage and operate its CR license at a full-service restaurant located at the Premises (“Establishment”). The Applicant currently seeks, and will not without the ANC6B's agreement seek to increase, total seating for 65 patrons, inclusive of sidewalk cafe seating. In no event shall Applicant operate or seek to operate the Establishment in excess of the maximum number of patrons that may lawfully occupy the Premises pursuant to its Certificate of Occupancy.


3. Hours of Operation and Sales. The Applicant’s hours of operation may be changed from time to time in Applicant's discretion, as may be otherwise permitted by its License, but in no event shall exceed or extend beyond the following: Sunday through Thursday: 11:00 a.m. – 1:30 a.m. Friday and Saturday: 11:00 a.m. – 3:00 a.m. And as to the Applicant's Sidewalk Cafe, the Applicant's sale of alcohol within and operation of the Sidewalk Cafe shall not exceed or extend beyond the following: Sunday through Saturday: 11:00 a.m. -- 12:00 midnight 4. Requirements for Operation of Sidewalk Café. The Applicant shall operate its Sidewalk Café consistent with the terms and conditions of its Public Space Management Branch Certification for such space, and shall cause its employees to maintain the Sidewalk Café in a clean and orderly manner, and not to cause or permit storage of any refuse, foodstuffs, perishable or odiferous materials in or adjacent to the Sidewalk Café. The Applicant shall cause the area extending from the Sidewalk Cafe to the curb in front of the Establishment to be regularly swept and shall remove litter and debris on not less than a daily basis, weather permitting. 5. Refuse Storage and Disposal. Applicant shall construct, maintain, and exclusively utilize interior space within the Premises to store all grease and non-recyclable trash, with direct access to the interior trash storage area from the dining, hallway, and/or kitchen area of the Premises. Applicant shall not utilize any exterior doors to the trash storage room for purposes of disposing of trash or grease, and shall maintain such exterior doors in a closed and secured position except as reasonably required for regularly-scheduled trash pickup and grease disposal by third-party vendors. Additionally, the Applicant shall utilize its best commercially reasonable efforts to store (a) grease within the kitchen or other interior space of the Premises (and not within the designated interior trash storage room), and (b) recycling within the indoor trash storage room, except as may be reasonably required to effect removal and disposal by third-party vendor(s). Applicant shall ensure that the area around any exterior recycling receptacles and any interior trash receptacles are at all times clean and free of debris, trash, liquids, or other foreign materials. Applicant shall ensure that the lids to any such receptacles are closed and secured as per their design at all times except when they are being filled or emptied. Applicant shall cause all receptacles to be emptied not less than three times each week, or such more frequent schedules as may be reasonably necessary to prevent the receptacles from exceeding their capacity. Applicant shall cause such receptacles to be maintained in good repair, safe and sanitary condition. Applicant shall cause the area behind the Establishment abutting and including the immediately surrounding public alley to be power-washed not less than once every week. Applicant shall not dispose of


glass bottles or other refuse causing noise due to breakage between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. 6. Sanitation and Pest Control. Applicant shall maintain in force a contract for regular and recurring application of a plan for pest control that includes baiting or similar rodent abatement procedures abutting the alley at the rear entrance to the Premises (including the trash storage room) and surrounding any refuse receptacles. Applicant shall not store or place any kegs, bottles, foodstuffs, palettes of materials, or other consumable goods of any type outside the Premises. Applicant shall regularly inspect and clean the area immediately adjacent to the rear of the Premises, abutting and including the immediate proximity of the public alley, to be cleaned of any cigarette butts, chewing gum, or other similar debris, and shall instruct its employees to not loiter in the adjacent alleyway or rear doorway to the Premises.

For ANC6B: ____________________________________ Dated:___________ Kirsten Oldenburg, Chair For Applicant ____________________________________ Dated:___________ Aaron Silverman Managing Member

1

Report of the ANC6B Planning & Zoning Committee Meeting May 5, 2015, 7:00 p.m.

Commissioners present: Burger (chairing), Chao, Hoskins, Oldenburg, Samolyk

Resident members (RM) present: Alexander, Barnett, Danks, Frishberg, Jarboe, Jeffords

1. PS #10180160, Souk, 705 8th Street SE, new un-enclosed sidewalk café: Winnette McIntosh

Ambrose & Kelsey Evers

The applicant plans to put a sidewalk café in front of an existing storefront on 8th street. Commissioner Oldenburg moved (seconded by RM Alexander) that we recommend ANC support the case contingent on seeing a revised plan for the sidewalk cafe. The committee voted 11 to 0 in support of the motion.

2. HPA #15-367, 732 7th Street SE, raze: Potomac Electric Power Co., Michael Maxwell & Adrienne Sheffield

The applicant (not present) seeks historic approval to raze a non-contributing building in the historic district. The ANC received a letter from nearby neighbors opposing the request. Commissioner Oldenburg moved (seconded by Commissioner Chao) that we recommend the ANC oppose the raze request because we have no information on what will replace it or what the options are for adaptive reuse and place the case on the consent agenda. The committee voted 11 to 0 in support of the motion.

3. Marine Barracks Washington, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, comments deadline—Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Commissioner Oldenburg discussed the Draft EIS, including impacts on the community. RM Frishberg moved (seconded by RM Jarboe) that the committee recommend to the ANC that we articulate our priority concerns related to the neighborhood issues on this case, which include continued mixed use development and revenue issues, opposition to sites A, B, and C, and recommendation for support for sites D or E, and the lack of historic preservation concerns related to site E. We recommend the ANC convey these views to the EIS Project Manager in a letter to be finalized by Commissioner Oldenburg. The committee voted 10 to 0 in favor of the motion.

4. ZC #15-08, text amendment to amend Section 3180(c) to add a fee for chancery cases where no gross floor area is involved, ZC hearing—Monday, June 1, 2015

2

RM Jarboe explained his reading of the text amendment, concluding that there was essentially no relevance to ANC6B. By unanimous consent we removed this item from the agenda.

5. Subcommittee on PUDs, Nomination/Appointment of Members Commissioner Burger presented the proposed list of community members for ANC6B’s PUD

subcommittee. Kay Mallon (510 13th St SE) Brad Hiltscher (1391 Pennsylvania Ave SE) Noah Bason (922 14th St SE) Richard Zanfardino (909 14th St SE) Damon Horn (1333 E St SE) Courtney McNamara (551 14th St SE) Commissioner Burger moved (seconded by RM Barnett) that we approve the slate of six proposed subcommittee members. The committee voted 10 to 0 in favor of the motion.

1 | P a g e

1 2

May 13, 2015 3 4 Ms Katherine Childs 5 MBW EIS Project Manager 6

1314 Harwood Street SE, Building 212 7 Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5018 8 9 VIA EMAIL: 10 11

RE: Comments on the April 2015 Marine Barracks Washington Draft Environmental Impact 12 Statement 13

14 Dear Ms Childs, 15 16 At a regularly scheduled and properly noticed meeting on May 12, 2015, with a quorum present, 17

Advisory Neighborhood Commission 6B (ANC 6B) voted x-x-x to send this letter with our 18 comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement for Multiple Projects in Support of 19 Marine Barracks Washington, DC. 20

21

Summary 22 ANC 6B supports Alternatives 4 and 5, as sites for a new Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) as 23 they provide for MBW's needs while preserving the urban character and mixed-use needs of the 24 surrounding neighborhood. ANC 6B strongly rejects the selection of Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 for 25

a BEQ. The details follow. 26

27

Rejected Alternatives 28 Within our Commission area, we strive to create, maintain and preserve vibrant urban 29

commercial districts and single- and family-oriented residential areas. The DEIS proposal to 30 situate a new BEQ in either Site A (Alternative 1) or Site B (Alternative 2) within the borders of 31

ANC6B violates those principals. Thus, as the Commission has said often in the past, we are 32 strongly opposed to either of these sites becoming MBW’s preferred alternative. The current 33 land use plans support mixed uses (i.e., office, retail, and residential) at both Sites A and B. A 34 BEQ at either site would be totally incompatible with these plans. For the same reasons, the 35

Commission does not support the selection of Site C (Alternative 3) as the preferred site. This 36 property is part of an approved development plan for the 42-acre Yards project and a BEQ here 37 would be an incompatible land use for a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood composed of 38

residences, retail and offices. 39 40 Building a fenced BEQ of 90 feet in height at Site A would create a dead zone along what is 41 poised to become a pedestrian-friendly extension of the Barracks Row north of the freeway. It 42

would displace small businesses that have been in operation for over a decade and, significantly, 43 cause the destruction of at least a dozen historic buildings in the Capitol Hill Historic District. In 44 addition, it would eliminate 55 residential units about to begin construction on Potomac Avenue 45 and 9th Street SE. 46 47

2 | P a g e

The DEIS states that existing private development plans for Alternative 3 (Site C)—while 1

currently vacant—could be “more productive than a BEQ Complex”. It then states: 2 3

The long-term socioeconomic productivity of the Alternative 1 and 2 sites, but for the 4

development of the BEQ Complex, site [sic] would be highly speculative as no formal 5 plans for redevelopment of these areas has yet been formulated.” [page 6-4] 6 7

First, this analysis fails to acknowledge that of the 25 lots that make up Site A, most are actively 8 in productive use (i.e., not vacant). Further, this analysis is out of date. As mentioned above, 9

several lots in the southern portion of Site A are actively under development and the Washington 10 Humane Society (WHS) has recently purchased most of the lots that make up Site B. 11 12 The DEIS proposal for a BEQ on Site B would be a gated island that will not contribute in any 13

manner to the urban fabric of the surrounding area. The building at 110 feet in height would be 14 way out of proportion to the two story buildings immediately west. In contrast, WHS plans to 15

erect a mixed use 50 foot tall building there next to its existing Spay and Neuter facility on the 16 corner of 10th and L Streets SE. WHS has the authority to enforce animal cruelty and protection 17

laws for the District of Columbia. The organization plans to include in its new building its 18 animal shelter and adoption facilities, an animal training center, a youth education center, 19 housing for veterinarian students, offices, and a retail shop/cafe on the ground floor. Thus, 20

unlike a BEQ, this complex will draw visitors to the neighborhood from all over the city and 21 critically pedestrians from both the Navy Yard and Eastern Market Metro stations who may shop 22

and/or dine in establishments along the way. 23 24

Preferred Alternatives 25 The Commission supports the selection of either Site D (Alternate 4) or Site E (Alternate 5) as 26

the site for a BEQ. Both of these sites place a new BEQ on existing Federal land, saving Federal 27 tax dollars and resources for land acquisition, and result in no reduction to the District 28 government tax base. Using either of these sites would appear to get MBW quicker to its goal of 29

moving enlisted personnel to building that meets DOD Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection 30 requirements. Siting a BEQ at either would also cause minimal to no disruption to our 31

neighborhoods beyond the construction phase. 32 33

We focus our discussion on Site E. It is adjacent to ANC 6B and, since the study process began 34 in 2010, the Commission has asked that this Marine Annex site be included as an alternative. 35 The DEIS stresses that the major environmental impact of Site E is the effect on the L’Enfant 36 Plan 6th Street viewshed. The Commission does not consider protection of the 6th Street 37 viewshed a compelling reason to reject Site E as a preferred alternative. First, while the DEIS 38

refers to a “commitments to preserve this viewshed in the existing Section 106 agreement 39 document (MOU),” [page 4-34] this MOU is never detailed nor cited in the report. The 40

Commission has learned from the Historic Preservation Office that the document was executed 41 in 2001 as part of Section 106 findings in connection with the proposed Marine Annex and at the 42 time 6th Street was but a “visual corridor. Second, today the loss of a one block length of a 43 viewshed is minor compared with the overall impacts of proposed Sites A, B, and C on the 44 community. Thus, the Commission does not support the contention that removing this viewshed 45 is an adverse impact under this DEIS’ Section 106 review. 46

3 | P a g e

1

The proposed building for Site E at 90 feet in height is in good proportion to the existing 2 building on the site and plans for a 7-8 story commercial building on the 600 block of M Street 3 SE and the 4-5 story Lofts at Capitol Quarters along L Street SE across from the Marine Annex, 4

currently under construction. 5 6 Site E fits the stated criteria for selection as the preferred alternative. At 6 minutes, it has the 7 second shortest walk from the Main Post and is a walk that Marines already take regularly. It 8 meets the minimum developable area requirements for a DOD-owned site when the parking is 9

retained at Building 20. And, it does not require the relocation of public services to DC 10 residents, as the playing fields will be preserved. 11 12

Resolution of Building 20 13 The Commission and its constituents are keenly interested in the future of Building 20. It has the 14 potential to contribute to the enhancement of our neighborhoods by providing a pivotal 15

connection between upper and lower Barracks Row on the east side of 8th Street SE. However, 16 we recognize that the future of Building 20 is partly dependent upon the ultimate BEQ site 17

chosen as a parking facility cannot apparently be included on either Sites D or E. Since the 18 Commission supports the selection of either D or E as the preferred alternative, we agree that the 19 resolution of Building 20 will have to wait. But, the Commission does not agree with the 20

implication in the DEIS that Building 20 planning cannot begin for 5 more years. Once the Final 21 EIS and ROD are completed (“anticipated in 2016”), WMB should start a robust public planning 22

process on Building 20. 23 24

Construction Impacts on Immediate Neighbors 25 The immediate neighbors of MBW were unnecessarily impacted by recent renovation of 26

Building 9 within the Historic Barracks (Main Post). Trying to rectify these impacts proved 27 almost impossible. The DEIS mentions plans to renovate Building 8 within the Main Post with 28 FY 2016 funds but has removed it from the EIS process. Within the Interior Renovations at the 29

Main Post section of the DEIS is a description of renovation plans for Building 7. This building 30 sits opposite residences along the 700 block of 9th Street SE. Prior to the initiation of any 31

construction on either Building 8 or 7, the Commission expects MBW to engage in a public 32 dialog with the Commission and the neighbors—as it did when the Commandants House was 33

renovated some years ago—to work out a construction management plan, based on the 34 Management Measures listed in Section 2.2.5 of the DEIS. 35

36 In conclusion, ANC 6B thanks MBW for the opportunity to comment on its DEIS. But, we 37 reiterate that the Commission is diametrically opposed to the selection of Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 38

and believes it is in the best interest of both MBW and the surrounding community that 39 Alternative 4 or 5 be chosen as the preferred alternative in the Final EIS. 40

41 Sincerely, 42 43 44 45 Kirsten Oldenburg 46

4 | P a g e

Chair 1

2 CC: 3 The Honorable Charles Allen, Ward 6 Councilmember 4

The Honorable Muriel Bowser, Mayor of the District of Columbia 5 The Honorable Eleanor Holmes Norton, Representative, U.S. House of Representatives 6 The Honorable Elisa Silverman, At Large Councilmember 7 The Honorable Vincent Orange, At Large Councilmember 8 Mr. Bruce Kenner, Acting Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development 9

Mr. Eric Shaw, Director, District of Columbia Office of Planning 10 Mr. David Mahoney, Director, Historic Preservation Office 11 Mr. Michael G. Stevens, Executive Director, Capitol Riverfront BID 12 Mr. Martin Smith, Executive Director, Barracks Row Main Street 13

Ms Lisa LaFontaine, CEO and President, Washington Humane Society 14 Mr. George Webb, Partner, NOVO Development 15

Mr. Matt Johnson, National Community Church 16 Mr. xxx Ziegler, Lincoln Properties Company <[email protected]> 17

18

921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE Washington, DC 20003-2141 [email protected] 202-546-8542 Executive Director Susan Eads Role

OFFICERS Chair Kirsten Oldenburg

Vice-Chair Brian Flahaven

Secretary Daniel Chao

Treasurer Diane Hoskins

Parliamentarian Denise Krepp

COMMISSIONERS SMD 1 Jennifer Samolyk SMD 2 Diane Hoskins SMD 3 James Loots SMD 4 Kirsten Oldenburg SMD 5 Steve Hagedorn SMD 6 Nick Burger SMD 7 Daniel Chao SMD 8 Chander Jayaraman SMD 9 Brian Flahaven SMD 10 Denise Krepp

May 13, 2015 Ms. Catrina Felder Public Space Management Branch District Department of Transportation 1100 4th Street SW, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20024 VIA E-MAIL: [email protected] RE: DDOT Tracking #108132, 921 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Hill Center,

Gates to Match Historic Fence Dear Ms. Felder: At its regularly scheduled, properly noticed meeting on May 12, 2015, with a quorum present, Advisory Neighborhood Commission 6B voted x-x in support of the Hill Center’s proposal to add two gates to its existing fence that was approved

and installed about 3 years ago. The gates will be installed at two openings in the existing fence along the 9th Street SE side and will be the same height (6 feet, 2 inches) and style as the existing fence. A copy of the drawings the Commission reviewed is attached, showing the locations of Gate A and Gate B. Please contact Commissioner Kirsten Oldenburg, ANC 6B’s Chair, at 202-546-8542 or [email protected] if you have questions or need further information. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Kirsten Oldenburg Chair

Attachment



1 | P a g e

Report of the ANC6B Transportation Committee Meeting May 6, 2015

Commissioners present: Daniel Chao, Denise Krepp, and Kirsten Oldenburg (chairing) Resident Members present: Jerry Sroufe (6B02), Laura Jeffords (6B03), John Manley (6B04), Michael Berger (6B06), Carol Grissom (6B08), and Keith Smith (6B09) Other Participants: Residents and Representatives of Freedom Way alley and Larry Janezich. Discussion of a Green Alley Designation for Freedom Way John Cochran presented the residents request that Freedom Way be designated as a Green Alley and that the installation be concurrent with the DDOT’s FY15 plans to renovate the alley. Prior to the meeting, Commissioner

Flahaven had circulated a draft letter to DDOT and DDOE for consideration by the Committee. The Committee made several suggestions for revisions, including that the phrase “submitted an application” be replaced by a short

description of what actually occurred (various telephone conversations with Meredith Upchurch, the DDOE (or, DDOT?) POC on Green Alleys); and that “Last year” be substituted by an actual date. Also, it was suggested that

Meredith Upchurch be included on the CC list of the letter. (In an email not received prior to the meeting, Commissioner Hoskins requested that the letter include “mention of storm water runoff reduction and resulting

water quality benefits for the River.” The Committee voted 9-0 to recommend that the ANC send the letter with suggested revisions to DDOT and DDOE. The motion was made by Commissioner Krepp and seconded by Carol Grissom. Note to Reviewers: Normally this report includes any revised letters. But, due to Commissioner Flahaven’s absence

at the meeting, the DDOT/DDOE letter with revisions will be circulated to all for review separately. Review of DDOT Traffic Study involving the addition of a signalized pedestrian crossing on 11th Street between I and M Streets SE Mr. Wasim Raja of the Transportation Operations Administration of DDOT submitted a study to ANC6B whose purpose was to assess intersection operations and safety history along the 11th Street SE corridor between M and I Streets SE to determine what, if any, changes were warranted. The study addressed the following primary concerns:

1. Providing an additional pedestrian crossing between M and I Streets SE, 2. Evaluating optimal lane usage on the I-695 off ramp onto 11th Street, and 3. Evaluating signal timings/pedestrian crossing time at 11th and M Streets.

ANC6B had requested #1 in a letter to DDOT in December 2014 and through DC Council testimony in March 2015. Commissioner Chao, with the assistance of Frank Maduro, arranged for an onsite visit to the area on March 12, 2015. At that time, we learned that DDOT was in the process of studying #1 and #3, which is also of concern to the ANC. We were promised an analysis within 45 days. That 15-page study was completed on schedule and sent to the ANC on May 6, 2015. On #1, DDOT proposes to install a signalized crossing just north of the eastbound exit off I-695 but not to do so until the CSX project has finished its VAT work in this area. On #3, DDOT says that it plans to continue to collect

2 | P a g e

date on this relatively long crossing during the current baseball season. In the meantime, no changes are recommended. Commission Chao noted that the study was thorough but he was concerned about a delay in installing a new crosswalk and the conclusions re the crossing at 11th and M. Most other committee members agreed with this view and questioned why DDOT had to wait until after the CSX project was completed in the area to install the crosswalk. Is the delay just a matter of the cost of installing it and then having to reinstall it? Commissioner Krepp indicated her concern with a phrase “Based on an updated safety and operational analysis,” in the first line under the

Recommendations section. Is there another study? If so, we want to know about it. Some questioned the DDOT conclusion that putting crossing at either K or L was not feasible. Because of the many questions, Commissioner Oldenburg suggested that this study be re-considered at the June meeting once members have more time to read the entire document. Oldenburg noted that the CSX tunnel runs just south of the D4 ramp. As a consequence CSX has had to agree to create/pay for the planned 4th lane for this exit as a part of its VAT project. Between now and June, Commissioner Oldenburg will talk with CSX and get information on when the VAT project schedule involves this area. (Note: According to the 120-day schedule, over the next 4 months, CSX will be relocating public utilities on 11th and L Streets just south of the I-695 (ramp D4) exit.) Commissioner Oldenburg will also convey the committee concerns to DDOT and will ask for a more “friendly” map

of the planned crossing area that provides more context.

3 | P a g e

Attachment: Letter to DDOT and DDOE May 12, 2015 Leif Dormsjo Tommy Wells Director Director District Department of Transportation District Department of the Environment 55 M Street SE, Suite 400 1200 First Street NE Washington, DC 20003 Washington, DC 20002 VIA EMAIL: RE: Inclusion of Freedom Way SE in the Green Alley Program Dear Directors Dormsjo and Wells, We write to urge your agencies to include Freedom Way SE in the District’s Green Alley program. Advisory

Neighborhood Commission 6B voted X-X to send this letter at a properly noticed meeting on May 12, 2015 with a quorum present. Freedom Way SE is an important access and communal space in the heart of a rapidly redeveloping neighborhood, and it's in terrible shape. The alley, located between Kentucky Ave SE, Barney Circle SE, Pennsylvania Avenue SE, 15th Street SE and Potomac Ave SE, runs downhill behind four city blocks and ends a short distance from the Anacostia River, and borders two major construction projects – the 77-unit 1600 Pennsylvania Ave SE and the 41-unit 1500 Pennsylvania Ave SE. It's rutted and patched with a mix of materials, which contributes to major flooding issues for residents living at the bottom of the alley during heavy rainfalls. There are also a number of residents who live on Freedom Way itself, with their front yards facing and draining onto the alley. The condition of the alley is a special concern for these residents who rely on it for mail delivery and emergency services. In many of the homes that face the alley or back into it are families with young children who now use or would like to use Freedom Way as play space. Residents have made efforts regularly to clean up the alley and improve it as shared public space, but have been frustrated by its poor condition. Freedom Way also serves as a habitat for birds that live on the Anacostia River or use the river as their flyway. With a mix of large, mature, native trees that connect directly to the Anacostia River, Freedom Way creates an inviting flyway for a remarkable mix of birds that are rarely found even one block away. In addition to the usual cardinals, blue jays and other urban birds, Freedom Way is home to or visited by red-tailed hawks, cedar waxwings, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, Carolina wrens, gold finches, red-winged blackbirds, downy woodpeckers, among others. The presence of this wide range of birds makes Freedom Way an ideal site for urban habitat restoration, which many residents are already doing on their own, but could better coordinate and promote through a broader green-alley effort. In February 2014, nearby residents contacted Meredith Upchurch at DDOT to discuss including Freedom Way in the Green Alley Program. Resurfacing Freedom Way as a green alley, with permeable pavers and areas identified for bioswales and plantings, which the neighbors would plant and maintain, would serve to:

• Reduce storm run-off from the alley, contributing to better water quality for the Anacostia River, • Improve bird habitat, • Calm traffic – vehicles routinely use the alley as a shortcut, • Make the alley pedestrian friendly and create an inviting and usable public space for the community, and • Reduce the urban heat island effect.

4 | P a g e

DDOT is already planning to invest in repaving the alley this fiscal year, and the community has already invested its time, energy and personal resources to make Freedom Way a usable public space and urban habitat. We urge you to work together to make sure this project is done in a thoughtful and environmentally responsible way. Again, we urge you to include Freedom Way SE in the Green Alley program. If you have any specific questions, please contact Commissioner Brian Flahaven at [email protected] or 202-744-1854. Sincerely, Kirsten Oldenburg Chair cc: The Honorable Charles Allen, Councilmember, Ward 6 Meredith Upchurch, District Department of Transportation

Treasurers Report 5/12/15

* Account Leger Balance $ 8,747.68

*National Capital Bank Balance (5/1/15) $ 12,252.80

This is the account balance as of the 5/1/15 statement

Online balance (5/10/15) $ 9,276.09

*Total Expenditures 1/1/15 to date $ 10,243.47

*Total Income 1/1/15 to date $ 5,694.24

Expenditure Listing YTD

5/10/15, 2:04 PMPrint All | Office of the DC Auditor

Page 1 of 5http://dcauditor.org/qra/print-all?yqa=2015-2-28

Approval Date By Commission:

Treasurer:

Secretary Certification:

Chairperson:

Date:

Balance Forward $13,296.93

Receipts

District Allotment $5,692.01

Interest $1.09

Other $0.00

Transfer From Savings $0.00

Total Receipts $5,693.10

Total Funds Available $18,990.03

Disbursements

Total Disbursements $7,266.76

Ending Balance $11,723.27

Quarterly Report - ANC 6B, 2015 Q2

I hereby certify that the above noted quarterly financial report has been approved by a majority of Commissioners during a public meeting in which there existed a quorum.

1. Net Salary & Wages $4,479.722a. Health Insurance $0.002b. Casualty/Property Insurance $0.003. Total Federal Wage Taxes Paid (Income and Soc. Sec.) $1,299.604. State and Local Income Taxes Paid (DC, MD, VA) $0.005. Unemployment Insurance Contributions $0.006. Tax Penalties Paid $0.007. Local Transportation $8.558. Office Rent $480.009a. Landline Telephone $363.199b. Cellular Telephone $0.009c. Cable/Internet Services $0.0010. Postage and Delivery $0.0011. Utilities $0.0012. Printing and Copying $0.0013. Flyer Distribution $0.0014. Purchase of Service $0.0015. Office Supplies $322.7016a. Rental $0.0016b. Purchase $0.0017. Grants $0.0018. Training $0.0019. Petty Cash Reimbursement $0.0020. Transfer(s) to Savings Account $0.0021. Bank Service Charges $0.0022. Website/Webhosting $0.00

23. Other $313.00



Balance Forward: (from "Ending Balance" of Previous Fiscal Year) $3,448.35

Total Receipts $0.00 $18,001.49 $5,693.10 $1.14 $0.00 $23,695.73 $23,695.73 Total Funds Available: $21,449.84 $18,990.03 $11,724.41 $8,747.70

Total Expenditures $21,518.85 $8,152.91 $7,266.76 $2,976.71 $0.00 $18,396.38 $3,122.47

Ending Balance: $13,296.93 $11,723.27 $8,747.70 $8,747.70

2015 Budget - ANC 6B

Budget Receipts

Cat Amount Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 YTD Diff

D-AL District Allotment $0.00 $17,076.03$5,692.01 0.00 0.00 $22,768.04 $22,768.04

D-Int Deposit Interest $0.00 $1.80 $1.09 $1.14 0.00 $4.03 $4.03

D-O Deposit Other $0.00 $923.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 $923.66 $923.66

D-T Deposit Transfer - Transfer from Savings $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Budget Disbursements

Cat Amount Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 YTD Diff

1 Net Salary & Wages $13,427.00 $4,789.86 $4,479.72 $1,493.24 0.00 $10,762.82 $2,664.18

2a Health Insurance $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2b Casualty/Property Insurance $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3 Total Federal Wage Taxes Paid (Income and Soc. Sec.) $2,289.24 $1,606.20 $1,299.60 $1,181.46 0.00 $4,087.26 ($1,798.02)

4 State and Local Income Taxes Paid (DC, MD, VA) $843.00 $1,045.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 $1,045.01 ($202.01)

5 Unemployment Insurance Contributions $259.61 0.00 0.00 $99.36 0.00 $99.36 $160.25

6 Tax Penalties Paid $0.00 $76.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 $76.90 ($76.90)

7 Local Transportation $40.00 $3.33 $8.55 $12.11 0.00 $23.99 $16.01

8 Office Rent $1,200.00 0.00 $480.00 0.00 0.00 $480.00 $720.00

9a Landline Telephone $400.00 0.00 $363.19 0.00 0.00 $363.19 $36.81

9b Cellular Telephone $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9c Cable/Internet Services $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

10 Postage and Delivery $60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

11 Utilities $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

12 Printing and Copying $50.00 $13.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 $13.20 $36.80

13 Flyer Distribution $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

14 Purchase of Service $1,300.00 $535.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $535.00 $765.00

15 Office Supplies $1,250.00 $83.41 $322.70 $28.54 0.00 $434.65 $815.35

16a Rental $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

16b Purchase $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

17 Grants $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

18 Training $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

19 Petty Cash Reimbursement $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

20 Transfer(s) to Savings Account $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

21 Bank Service Charges $0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

22 Website/Webhosting $400.00 0.00 0.00 $162.00 0.00 $162.00 $238.00

23 Other $0.00 $0.00 $313.00 0.00 0.00 $313.00 ($313.00)



Expenditure Listing - ANC 6B, 2015 Q2

Note:

Cld Check Date Payee Cat Amount Purpose Date Approved

C 4739 2015-01-15 ANC Security Fund 27 25.00 ANC SecurityFund 01/13/15

C 4740 2015-02-04 Susan Eads Role 1 1493.24 January '15wages 09/09/14

C 4741 2015-02-04 Old Naval Hospital -Master Tenant 9 480.00 Meeting rooms

01/15 to 09/15 09/09/14

C 4742 2015-02-24 Susan Eads Role 1 1493.24 February '15wages 09/09/14

C 4743 2015-02-24 Susan Eads Role 8 8.55

Travelexpenses

(mileage andparking)

associated withpurchase of

offices supplies

09/09/14

C 4744 2015-02-24 Susan Eads Role 18 322.70 Office supplies 09/09/14

4745 2015-03-31 Susan Eads Role 1 1493.24 March '15wages 09/09/14

4746 2015-03-31 United States Treasury 4 1299.602014 Quarter

4, FederalWage Tages

09/09/14

4747 2015-03-31 Capital CommunityNews 27 288.00

FagonCommunity

Guide09/09/14

4748 2015-03-31 Brian Flahaven 10 363.19ANC Office

Landline (Septto February)

03/10/15



Balance Forward: (from "Ending Balance" of Previous Quarterly Report) $0.00

Receipts: Transfer(s) from Checking Account $0.00 Other (Interest Earning, etc.) $0.00 Total Receipts $0.00

Total Funds Available: $0.00

Disbursements: Transfer(s) to Checking Account $0.00 Other $0.00 Total Disbursements $0.00

Ending Balance: $0.00

Income Report

Checking

Savings

Note:

Deposit Type Payer Amount Date

District Allotment DistrictAllotment 5692.01 2015-03-16

Interest INTEREST 0.61 2015-01-31Interest INTEREST 0.48 2015-02-28

Deposit Type Payer Amount Date



Date of Bank Statement 4/01/2015

Ending balance on bank statement $ 15696.27

+ Total Outstanding Deposits $0.00

- Total Outstanding Checks/Charges for this Quarter $3,444.03

- Total Outstanding Checks/Charges for Previous Quarters $0.00

Reconciled Bank Balance $12,252.24

QRA Ledger Balance $11,723.27

Bank Statement/QRA Difference $528.97

Deposits Not on Statement Outstanding Checks

Reconciliation Report - ANC 6B, 2015 Q2

Note:

Source Date Amount

1234

Check Payee Date Amount

4745 Susan Eads Role 03/31/2015 $1,493.244746 United States Treasury03/31/2015 $1,299.604747 Capital Community News03/31/2015 $288.004748 Brian Flahaven 03/31/2015 $363.19

Financial Treasurer’s Report · 2018-02-26 · Marine Barracks Washington, Bachelor Enlisted...

Documents

Transcript of Financial Treasurer’s Report · 2018-02-26 · Marine Barracks Washington, Bachelor Enlisted...