Professor John Zietlow MBA 621 Spring 2006 The Scope Of Corporate Finance Chapter 1.
Financial Management in Religious Organizations Lilly Study Findings John Zietlow, D.B.A., CTP.
-
Upload
calvin-white -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Financial Management in Religious Organizations Lilly Study Findings John Zietlow, D.B.A., CTP.
Financial Management in Religious Organizations
Lilly Study FindingsJohn Zietlow, D.B.A., CTP
Title of Individual Responding to Survey
TITLE Percentage: Exec. Director 30% CFO 10% VP-Finance 10% Treasurer 20% Controller 0% Chief Accountant 10% Sundry Other 30%
Numbers add to more than 100% due to rounding.
Primary Management Objective
Serv. Qty.5.0%Effic.
Deliv.12.0%
Serv. Quality29.0%
Other6.0%
Serv. Qual. &
Quantity48.0%
Primary Financial Objective
1.Financial Breakeven
- Still Clear Favorite2.Maximize Net Revenue3.Maximize Cash Flow Minimize Cost Maximize Net Donations Minimize Fin. Risk
#1 Ranks:Breakeven0.4Net Revenue0.2Cash Flow0.1Cost Minim.0.1Net Donations0.1Financial Risk0.1
Degree of Achievement:Chief Financial Objective
Poor5.0%
Fair12.0%
Average30.0%
Very Good38.0%
Excellent15.0%
Main Obstacle - Better Achievement of Financial
Objective
Ineffective/Insufficient Fundraising – 42 %No Long-range Financial Planning - 19 %Ineffective Budgeting Practices - 6 %Poor Cost Control - 5 %Inadequate Finance Staffing - 5 %Other - 13 %
Resolution of Programmatic and Financial Objective Conflict
47% Would Scale Back on Program to Meet Financial Objective
24% Would Scale Back, But Not Enough to Meet Financial Objective16% Would Fully Implement Program13% Would Not Implement Program At All (although proposed by Exec. Dir. or Exec. Committee)
Selecting Which Programs to Initiate: Major and Minor Influences
MAJOR INFLUENCES:Charter - 56%IncorporationArticles - 30%I.R.S. Exemption - 28%ExecutivePreferences - 24%
LESSER INFLUENCES:
Donor Surveys - 4%Client Preferences- 12%Board Preferences- 19%Pres./Anticipated Financial Position- 17%Preserve Status Quo - 2%
Operating Budgets
* 87% Develop and Use Operating Budget* 12% Do Not Develop & Use Budget!
(versus 15% in my 1984 study)Of Those Using Budget:
– 87% Include Specified Purpose (Restricted) Funds or
Projects– Most of Remaining 13% Do Not
Include These (but they should)
Inputs to Budget Development:Check Each That Applies
* Prior Year Budget - 41%* Prior Year Actual - 66%* Zero-Based Review - 16%* Anticipated Revenue - 56%* Long-range Financial Plan - 14%* Other - 8%
Compute & Analyze Financial Ratios?
Unsure2.0%
No60.0%
Yes38.0%
Use Computer to Monitor or Forecast Cash?
NO21.0%
YES79.0%
Our Bank’s Perception – Are We Using Sophisticated and Useful
Cash Mgt. Techniques for Size/Type?
Agree/SA45.0%
Neutral33.5%
Disagree/SD21.5%
Practice Daily Active Cash Management?
Unsure1.0%
No50.0%
Yes49.0%
Cash Forecasting Usage & Value
Ranking of Uses of the Cash Forecast:1. Anticipate Shortages, Surpluses2. Vary Fundraising Expense, See Effect3. Anticipate Effect of Varying Revenue
Develop a Cash Forecast?
No54%
Yes44%
Un-sure2%