Finance, CELA and Human Resource (HR). Tax and Trade ...
Transcript of Finance, CELA and Human Resource (HR). Tax and Trade ...
Steve covers Finance, CELA and Human Resource (HR). The Finance function includes: Purchasing, RE&F, Venture Integration, Corporate Finance, Finance Operations, Physical Security, Treasury, Investor Relations, Corporate Development and CELA’s Litigation, Government Affairs, Intellectual Property, Office of Legal Compliance, Corporate Operations, HR Legal Group, Business Legal Support and Citizenship & Public Affairs. Lastly, with the HR Function: Talent and organization, Compensation & Benefits, HR Strategy and Operations, and HR Global Operations.
Prior to joining Microsoft, Steve worked for Arthur Andersen, Protiviti, and Teledyne.
Angel is a Senior Risk Manager
overseeing Human Resources
(HR) in the Enterprise Risk
Organization. Historically,
Angel supported the financial
reporting pillar in the
Enterprise Risk Management
program. Prior to working in
the enterprise risk organization
Angel has held financial
analytical roles in the global
sales and marketing
organization as well as the
Cloud and Enterprise
organization.
Prior to joining Microsoft,
Angel worked for Arthur
Andersen in their New York
Office.
The corporate program areas that
Robert covers are Tax and Trade.
The Tax function includes: Direct Tax
Reporting, International Tax
(including Transfer Pricing), Tax
Planning & Controversies, Policy, Tax
Process Technology, Worldwide
Indirect Tax. The Trade function
includes: SAP-GTS (System), Export
Control Classification Number,
Importation, Harmonized Tariff
Schedules, Valuation, Denied Party
List Screening, and International
Commercial (INCO)Terms.
IIA Puget Sound Chapter Luncheon
Global Regulatory Transparency Initiatives:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
Microsoft Audit Group Charter
To be universally recognized as a driving force behind a culture of
governance, accountability and execution excellence that creates shareholder
value and enables Microsoft to be the world’s most trusted company. Vision:
Mission:We provide independent and objective audit, investigative, and advisory
services aimed at providing assurance to the Senior Leadership Team and the
Board of Directors that the company is appropriately identifying, prioritizing,
and mitigating its risk.
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
- Internal Audit
Program Manager
• organizational, process-level risk assessment
• annual audit plan development
• audit project scoping / identification of control objectives
• audit field work team preparedness
• stakeholder management
Project Manager / Project Lead
• fieldwork execution (management)
• workpaper excellence
• people management
• audit report writing
• quality assurance
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
SEC Public Disclosures
The Organization for
Economic Co-operation
and Development has also
recently launched a base
erosion and profit shifting
(“BEPS”) proposal that aims
to rationalize tax treatment
across jurisdictions. If the
BEPS proposal becomes the
subject of legislative action in
the format proposed, it could
have unintended taxation
consequences for collective
investment vehicles and the
Company’s tax position,
which could adversely affect
BlackRock’s financial
condition.
2014 has been a year of
significant change in the
international tax landscape,
as a result of the
Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and
Development’s (OECD)
project on Base Erosion and
Profit Shifting (‘BEPS’). Rio
Tinto agrees with the primary
aims of BEPS, which are to
prevent aggressive tax
avoidance and to update tax
rules on a consistent basis to
cater for modern, globalised
business structures. Rio Tinto
does not engage in
aggressive tax avoidance.
Additionally, longstanding
international tax norms that
determine each country’s
jurisdiction to tax cross-
border international trade are
evolving , such as the Base
Erosion and Profit Shifting
project (“BEPS") currently
being undertaken by the G8,
G20, and Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development ("OECD"). As
these and other tax laws and
related regulations change,
our financial results could be
materially impacted.
In July 2013 the OECD, which
represents a coalition of
member countries, issued an
action plan containing 15
comprehensive actions
intended to address tax base
erosion and jurisdictional
profit shifting (BEPS). Their
recommendations are aimed
at combating what they
believe is tax avoidance and
to attempt to harmonize the
application of transfer pricing
rules amongst member
states. Changes in tax laws
could affect the distribution
of our earnings, result in
double taxation and
adversely affect our results.
In 2013, the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), which
is comprised of member
countries that encompass many
of the jurisdictions where we
operate, issued an action plan
calling for a coordinated, multi-
jurisdictional approach to
address issues in existing tax
systems that the OECD believes
may lead to tax avoidance by
global companies, which the
OECD refers to as “base
erosion and profit shifting”
(BEPS). The OECD has not yet
finalized its recommendations
pursuant to the BEPS action
plan.
OECD BEPS Specific Disclosures
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
To align tax reporting standards globally and eliminate unfair tax practices.
15 actions to address concerns about the perceived international tax avoidance techniques of multinational corporations.
More than 100 countries have agreed to implement BEPS inspired compliance requirements.
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
What is BEPS?
As Defined by the Organization for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD)
The method by which companies
exploit gaps and mismatches in tax
laws to artificially shift profits from
high to low tax jurisdictions where
there is little or no economic activity.
The shrinking or slowed growth of
economic activity that is taxable
under effective application of
statutory law.
Base Erosion and Profit Shifting
BEPS RECOMMENDATIONS
Address the tax
challenges of the digital
economy
Neutralize the effects of
hybrid mismatch
arrangements
Design effective
controlled foreign
company rules
Limit base erosion
involving interest
deductions and other
financial payments
Counter harmful tax
practices more effectively,
taking into account
transparency and substance
Action 1 Action 2 Action 3 Action 4 Action 5
15 Action Items
Prevent the granting of
treaty benefits in
inappropriate
circumstances
Prevent the artificial
avoidance of permanent
establishment status
Align transfer pricing
outcomes with value
creation
Measure and monitor
BEPS
Follow mandatory disclosure
rules
Action 6 Action 7 Actions 8 – 10 Action 11 Action 12
Standardize transfer
pricing documentation
and country-by-country
reporting
Make dispute resolution
mechanisms more
effective
Develop a multilateral
instrument to modify
bilateral tax treaties
Action 13 Action 14 Action 15
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
Provide information about the
jurisdictional allocation of profits,
revenues, employees, and assets.
Required Information:
- Company Revenue
- Stated Capital
- Profit Before Income Taxes
- Accumulated Earnings
- Income Taxes Paid
- Number of Employees
- Income Tax Accrued
- Tangible Assets
Provide corporate-level information
about the MNC’s business, transfer
pricing policies, and agreements
with tax authorities.
Required Information:
- Legal ownership structure chart
(including geographies)
- Description of businesses,
including profit drivers and supply
chain information
- Intangibles such as company
strategy
- Financial information and activity
Provide legal entity-level
information about the MNC’s local
business, including related party
payments and receipts for products,
services, royalties, and interest
(among others)
Required Information:
- Local management information
and organization chart
- Intragroup payments and receipts
for products, services, and royalties
- Financial information
Organizational Impact of BEPS• Increase in inquiries and audit activity because tax and trade (e.g. customs) authorities will have access to
information that was previously unavailable
• Change or adjustment to location of business activities, inventories, and assets in order to reduce taxes
• Change in sales structure in order to create a fair tax structure
• Conversion of commissionaire to buy/sell low risk distributor
• Changing payments to different legal entities for royalty and license fees
• Changing payments to different legal entities for developmental services such as research and
development and procurement services
• Increase in reporting requirements due to the new country-by-country (CbC), master file, and local file
requirements
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
IIA Puget Sound Chapter October Luncheon 2017
• Increase the amount of tax information
companies must share with governments
• Enable governments to share tax information
with each other (and potentially with the public
in some cases)
• Eliminate a large number of tax “loopholes” that
companies take advantage of as a part of their
tax planning strategy
• Increase the compliance burden on tax
departments and the broader finance team
• Enact the same tax laws in every country
• Increase statutory corporate tax rates
• Require a radical restructuring of the corporate
functions (in most cases)
—Does the organization understand its tax position, both in its home jurisdiction and in other countries in which it operates? Is the board and management comfortable with where the organization has positioned its tax practices?
WSJ Article October 2017
The Board’s Role in Creating a Sustainable BEPS Plan
—In light of BEPS developments, should
the reporting methodology employed by
management in informing the board
about the organization’s tax practices
and relevant tax developments be
updated?
—What changes to the organization’s tax policy and business model should the board consider to be sure that the organization is aligned with BEPS initiatives and other new tax rules enacted in the jurisdictions in which the organization operates?
—How will BEPS and other new tax
developments impact the organization’s
share price? Is this expected and in line
with impact on comparable
organizations?
—Has the organization examined its legacy and current tax posture in light of the way it may be
perceived by stakeholders? Is there a risk that the tax posture may be misunderstood and will have a
negative impact on the organization’s reputation? If so, is the organization prepared to respond? Has
the board and management considered the potential financial impact of such reputational challenges.
The following are questions boards may want to consider with
regard to implementing BEPS recommendations.
Managing tax risk for
companies operating in a
continuously evolving global
tax environment extends well
beyond the actual outlay of
tax dollars.
US companies are not only
facing increasing reputational
and operational risk as they
adapt to increased
transparency and enhanced
international co-operation
between tax administrations,
but also legislative risk both
globally from the effects of
the OECD BEPS project and
domestically as the Trump
Administration and the
Republican Congress face
increased pressure to deliver
on their stated legislative
priorities.
• Identify the key people that need to be interviewed (head of tax; finance director; external
audit; tax advisers; HR and so on) and what their roles are in relation to tax;
• Gain clarity about which people are responsible for particular tax risks and what controls
they have to ensure that best practice and regulatory compliance are being followed.
• Understand clearly the ownership of the "tax universe" and the role of the tax team;
• Establish if there is a tax strategy: if there is one, what are the details, and who is in
charge?
• Review the organization’s cross collaboration cadence.
• Develop a tax-related internal audit plan that features the highest priority taxes and
processes, business units and jurisdictions;
• Plan may cover processes in tax function, finance, accounts payable, HR, payroll, business
units, third party providers, IT;
• Link the plan to the skills of the delivery team.