Final&ENTITLESyllabus& ·...

47
This project benefited from EC funding under the Marie Curie Actions Initial Training Networks FP7 PEOPLE 2011; contract Nº 289374 ENTITLE Final ENTITLE Syllabus Contract number: PITNGA2011289374 Title: ENTITLE European Network of Political Ecology Report number: D.1.1 Partner responsible Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona Deliverable author Christos Zografos Deliverable editor Giorgos Kallis Delivery date January 2016 Dissemination level PUBLIC Abstract This report outlines the syllabus for a political ecology 12week, postgraduate course based on the courses offered during the ENTITLE training project. The syllabus is designed both to adapt to the needs of a taught course and for selfstudy. It also includes an Annex with an expanded reading list in political ecology, put together by Prof Julian Bloomer with contributions from members of the PESO email list.

Transcript of Final&ENTITLESyllabus& ·...

  • This  project  benefited  from  EC  funding  under  the  Marie  Curie  Actions  -‐  Initial  Training  Networks  -‐  FP7  -‐  PEOPLE  -‐  2011;  contract  Nº  289374  -‐  ENTITLE  

    Final  ENTITLE  Syllabus    

    Contract  number:     PITN-‐-‐-‐GA-‐-‐-‐2011-‐-‐-‐289374    Title:         ENTITLE  -‐-‐-‐  European  Network  of  Political  Ecology    Report    number:     D.1.1    Partner  responsible     Universitat  Autónoma  de  Barcelona    Deliverable  author     Christos  Zografos    Deliverable  editor  

       Giorgos  Kallis  

     Delivery  date      January  2016      Dissemination  level    PUBLIC        Abstract  This   report  outlines   the  syllabus   for  a  political  ecology  12-‐week,  post-‐graduate  course  based   on   the   courses   offered   during   the   ENTITLE   training   project.   The   syllabus   is  designed  both  to  adapt  to  the  needs  of  a  taught  course  and  for  self-‐study.  It  also  includes  an  Annex  with  an  expanded  reading  list  in  political  ecology,  put  together  by  Prof  Julian  Bloomer  with  contributions  from  members  of  the  PESO  email  list.                    

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.  

     

         Table  of  Contents    

    1.  Introduction  ..................................................................................................................................  1  

    2.  Teaching  instructions  ................................................................................................................  2  

    3.  Outline  of  classes  .........................................................................................................................  3  

    Annex  I:  Expanded  political  ecology  reading  list  ..................................................................  9                                                  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    1  

    1.  Introduction    

    This  syllabus  is  the  product  of  ENTITLE  training  events,  specifically  summer  schools  and  special   intensive   courses   (SIC)   conducted   within   the   ENTITLE   FP7   Initial   Training  Network  project,  which  trained  12  PhD  and  seven  post-‐doctoral  researchers  in  the  field  of   political   ecology.   Between   2012-‐2016,   ENTITLE   offered   six   SIC   (in   Manchester,  Barcelona,  Rome,  and  Berlin)  and  three  summer  schools  (in  Syros,  Lund,  and  Istanbul),  with   a   duration   that   varied   between   four   and   six   days   per   event.   Lectures   and  public  events   during   those   courses   were   recorded,   and   together   with   other   audio-‐visual  material  generated  by  the  project  are  made  freely  available  both  in  the  project’s  website  (http://www.politicalecology.eu   under   the   “Media”   tab)   and   at:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_ROQZLIwFUl8i3BmUvQZ3g/featured.      For  the  purposes  of  this  document,  we  have  selected  only  some  of  the  topics  that  were  taught   during   those   courses   because   the   objective   of   the   syllabus   is   to   provide   a  relatively   concise,   12-‐class   course  on  political   ecology.  This  document   is  not  meant   to  provide   an   exhaustive   list   of   all   topics   covered   by   political   ecology   (for   this,   one   can  check   relevant   textbooks  or   collections,   such   as  Robbins   (2012),   Perault   et   al.   (2015),  and   Peet   et   al.   (2010)   that   are   listed   among   the   syllabus   references),   but   a   series   of  classes   on   major   topics   that   were   covered   with   ENTITLE   training   and   resources   for  completing   those   classes.   This   syllabus   has   been   widely   distributed   through   project  partners,  will  be  further  distributed  through  an  ENTITLE  project  stand  in  the  upcoming  ‘Undisciplined   Environments’   ENTITLE   international   conference   in   Stockholm   (20-‐24  March  2016),  and  is  made  available  through  the  project’s  website.      At  the  end  of  the  document,  we  have  also  added  an  Annex  with  an  expanded  reading  list  in  political  ecology,  put  together  by  Prof  Julian  Bloomer  (Trinity  College  Dublin)  through  the  PESO  email  list  in  political  ecology  with  the  assistance  of  that  list’s  coordinator  Prof  Josiah   Heyman   (University   of   Texas   at   El   Paso)   and   the   contribution   of   that   list’s  members   who   provided   the   information   on   the   readings;   a   significant   part   of   the  expanded   reading   list   comes   from   from   Prof   Simon   Batterbury’s   2016   postgraduate  course   ‘Political   Ecology   of   Development’   at   the   University   of   Melbourne.  We   greatly  thank   Professors   Bloomer,   Heyman   and   Batterbury   for   providing   and   accepting   to  include  that  list  in  this  syllabus.                        

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    2  

    2.  Teaching  instructions  

    Objectives  This   syllabus   introduces   students   to   the   multi-‐disciplinary   field   of   political   ecology,  which   considers   the   relevance   of   power   and   politics   for   shaping   the   relationship  between  humans  and   their  environments.  After   taking   this   course,   students   should  be  able   to   identify   and   explain   ways   in   which   power   and   politics   influence   the   human-‐environment   relationship,   analyse   themselves   socio-‐environmental   issues   under   the  lenses  of  political  ecology,  and  conduct  empirical  research  that  leads  to  such  an  analysis.      Structure  and  content  The   course   is   broken  down   into   three   parts.   The   first   part   introduces   students   to   the  field   and   key   concepts   of   political   ecology,   and   sets   out   an   analytical   framework   for  conceptualising   three   main   elements   that   are   central   to   a   political   ecology  understanding   of   human-‐environmental   relations:   society,   nature   and   capitalism.   The  second   part   examines   applications   and   variations   of   this   framework   upon   different  expressions   of   human-‐environment   interactions.   It   considers   the   environmental  implications   of  major   economic   activities   (extractive   industry,  waste   generation,   etc.),  the  conflicts  related  to  them  and  the  ways  in  which  power  relations  shape  those  conflicts  and  influence  the  capacity  to  both  engage  in  conflict  and  create  viable  alternatives.  The  third   part   provides   some   tools   for   conducting   and   communicating   political   ecology  research,  and  a  final  class  that  reflects  on  the  role  of  political  ecologists  when  engaging  with  policy  and  politics.      Using  the  syllabus  This   syllabus   can  be  used   for   either   teaching   a   course   in   a   conventional  way,   e.g.   in   a  class,   or   for   self-‐study.   Its   12   classes   could   be   taken   either   in   the   course   of   12-‐weeks  (typically  an  academic  semester  in  many  university  curricula)  or  in  more  concentrated  forms   (such   as   in   the   course   of   four  weeks  with   e.g.   three   classes   per  week).   Taught  courses  could  use   the  syllabus  conventionally,  by  asking  students   to  read  the  readings  before  class,  then  discuss  the  readings  in  class  and  use  the  videos  (in  the  classroom)  to  highlight  important  points  related  to  each  class,  in  a  process  facilitated  by  an  instructor.      Self-‐study  could  follow  the  same  process,  i.e.  first  read  the  references  for  each  class  and  then  watch  the  videos  to  clarify  key  points,  or  invert  this  process,   i.e.  start  with  videos  and  explore  more  into  depth  the  topic  with  text,  depending  on  the  inclination  of  students  to  better  absorb  audio-‐visual  or  written  text  –  this  is  something  that  self-‐taught  students  could   also   experiment   with   at   the   beginning   of   the   course,   and   may   want   to   vary  depending  on   the   “communicability”   of   each   lecture   (video).   For   self-‐taught   purposes,  we  would  highly  recommend  that  students  try  to  form  groups  of  collective  self-‐study  if  possible.   This   could   be   operationalized  by   getting   each   student   to   read   class   readings  first,  then  the  group  getting  together  to  watch  the  video  of  the  ENTITLE  lecture  and  then  hold   a   group  discussion   trying   to   clarify   points   to   each   other   and   reflect   on  what   has  been  learned.  If  further  questions  arise  that  cannot  be  answered  by  the  group  after  the  end  of  each  class,   the  group  could   try   contacting   (e.g.  by  email)  academics   relevant   to  their   questions   (e.g.   identify   them   through   the   class   readings)   to   ask   for   further  references  (textual  or  audio-‐visual)  that  could  clarify  points.    

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    3  

    3.  Outline  of  classes    PART  I:  INTRODUCTION    Class  1:  What  is  political  ecology?  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Paul  Robbins  (Nelson  Institute,  University  of  Wisconsin-‐Madison,  USA)  • Giorgos  Kallis  (Institute  of  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  (ICTA),  

    Universitat  Autònoma  de  Barcelona,  Spain)    Readings:    • Robbins,  P.  (2012).  Political  versus  apolitical  ecologies.  Political  ecology:  A  critical  

    introduction  (2nd  edition),  John  Wiley  &  Sons,  11-‐24.  • Peet,  R.,  Robbins,  P.,  &  Watts,  M.  (2010).  Global  nature.  Global  political  ecology,  

    Routledge,  1-‐47.    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  class  support  material  for  the  class:  • ENTITLE  scholars:  What  is  political  ecology?  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLVE69QZt5w    • Maria  Kaika:  Political  ecology.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5PRfxNUBao      • Paul  Robbins:  The  ecology  in  political  ecology.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1QkulKOZ4c    • Thomas  Perreault:  Corrientes,  colonialismos  y  contradicciones:  Repensando  los  

    raices  y  trayectorias  de  la  ecología  política  [Currents,  colonialisms  and  contradictions:  Rethinking  the  roots  and  trajectories  of  political  ecology].  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mfsC-‐wfAEY  

       Class  2:  Theorising  nature-‐society-‐capitalism  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Noel  Castree  (School  of  Environment,  Education  and  Development,  University  of  

    Manchester,  UK)  • Jason  Moore  (Sociology  Department,  Binghamton  University  SUNY,  USA)    Readings:    • Castree,  N.  (1995).  The  nature  of  produced  nature:  materiality  and  knowledge  

    construction  in  Marxism.  Antipode  27,  12-‐48  • Moore,  J.  W.  (2010).  ‘Amsterdam  is  Standing  on  Norway’  Part  II:  The  Global  North  

    Atlantic  in  the  Ecological  Revolution  of  the  Long  Seventeenth  Century,  Journal  of  Agrarian  Change  10(2),  188–  227  

     ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  • Noel  Castree:  Theorising  nature-‐society-‐capitalism.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30eEEEP_3OM  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvIYPkL-‐klE    

    • Jason  Moore:  The  Capitalocene  today  and  in  the  past.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MbOtBHOpr8    

       

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    4  

         PART  II:  THEMES  IN  POLITICAL  ECOLOGY    Class  3:  The  political  ecology  of  energy  and  extraction  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Gavin  Bridge  (Department  of  Geography,  Durham  University,  UK)  • Stephan  Bouzarovski  (School  of  Environment,  Education  and  Development,  

    University  of  Manchester,  UK)    Readings:    • Bridge,  G.,  &  Le  Billon,  P.  (2013).  Oil.  Cambridge:  Polity.  • �Bouzarovski,  S.  (2009).  East-‐Central  Europe's  changing  energy  landscapes:  a  place  

    for  ������������geography.  Area  41,  452-‐46    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  

    • Gavin  Bridge:  The  political  ecology  of  extractive  resources.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5OzWlPauu0  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=falGbCWbZU8    

    • Stephan  Bouzarovski:  Urban  energy  transitions  and  vulnerability.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmsdSYdiUQc  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKGqcjPgrYo    

       Class  4:  Commodification  and  waste  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Amita  Baviskar  (Institute  of  Economic  Growth,  India)  • Marco  Armiero  (Environmental  Humanities  Lab,  KTH  Royal  Institute  of  Technology,  

    Sweden)    Readings:    • Baviskar,  A.  (2011).  What  the  eye  does  not  see:  the  Yamuna  in  the  imagination  of  

    Delhi.  Economic  and  Political  Weekly,  46(50),  45-‐53  • Armiero,  M.,  &  D'Alisa,  G.  (2012).  Rights  of  resistance:  the  garbage  struggles  for  

    environmental  justice  in  Campania,  Italy.  Capitalism  Nature  Socialism,  23(4),  52-‐68    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  • Amita  Baviskar:  Commodity  Fictions.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FA4lDssj_7s    • Giacomo  D’Alisa:  Waste  conflicts.    

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0gcKZufT1I                

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    5  

         Class  5:  Environmental  conflicts    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Phil  Woodhouse  (Institute  for  Development  Policy  &  Management,  University  of  

    Manchester,  UK)  • Giorgos  Kallis  (Institute  of  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  (ICTA),  

    Universitat  Autònoma  de  Barcelona,  Spain)    Readings:    • Woodhouse,  P.  (2012).  New  investment,  old  challenges.  Land  deals  and  the  water  

    constraint  in  African  agriculture.  Journal  of  Peasant  Studies,  39(3-‐4),  777-‐794  • Martinez-‐Alier,  J.,  Kallis,  G.,  Veuthey,  S.,  Walter,  M.,  &  Temper,  L.  (2010).  Social  

    metabolism,  ecological  distribution  conflicts,  and  valuation  languages.  Ecological  Economics,  70(2),  153-‐158  

     ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  • Phil  Woodhouse:  Environmental  conflict  and  land.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zBhO9fDOlg  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw18Em3QOEE    

    • Giorgos  Kallis:  Droughts,  flood,  and  conflict.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur6HHC1jceM  

    • Beatriz  Rodriguez,  Joan  Martinez  Alier  and  Alf  Hornborg:  Ecologically  unequal  exchange  and  the  ecological  debt.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdPVw2GE7cg  

       Class  6:  Environmental  politics  I:  social  movements  and  protest    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Magnus  Wennerhag  (Department  of  Sociology  and  Work  Science,  University  of  

    Gothenburg,  Sweden)    • Alex  Loftus  (Department  of  Geography  King's  College  London,  UK)    Readings:    • Loftus,  A.  (2009).  Intervening  in  the  environment  of  the  everyday.  Geoforum  40,  326-‐

    334    • Martínez-‐Alier,  J.  (2003).  The  environmentalism  of  the  poor:  a  study  of  ecological  

    conflicts  and  valuation.  Edward  Elgar  Publishing.    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  

    • Alex  Loftus:  Everyday  environmentalism.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXVwsBjsO0s  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU62ni0FgNc    

             

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    6  

    Class  7:  Environmental  politics  II:  activism    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Marco  Armiero  (Environmental  Humanities  Lab,  KTH  Royal  Institute  of  Technology,  

    Sweden)  • Nükhet  Sirman  (Sociology  Department,  Boğaziçi  University,  Turkey)    Readings:    • Armiero,  M.  (2008).  Seeing  like  a  protester:  nature,  power,  and  environmental  

    struggles.  Left  History,  13(1)  • Featherstone,  D.,  &  Korf,  B.  (2012).  Introduction:  Space,  contestation  and  the  

    political.  Geoforum,  43(4),  663-‐668    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  

    • Marco  Armiero:  Seeing  like  a  protester.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCRaBqtAwsw  

    • Nükhet  Sirman:  Feminist  Perspectives  and  Transformative  Politics  in  Turkey.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgnO_zRoCgM    

    • Panel  with  Claudio  Cattaneo  and  Giacomo  D’Alisa.  Activist  research  on  political  ecology.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJDUV5_Mj0k    

       Class  8:  Urban  political  ecology  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Maria  Kaika  (School  of  Environment,  Education  and  Development,  University  of  

    Manchester,  UK)  • Erik  Swygendouw  (School  of  Environment,  Education  and  Development,  University  

    of  Manchester,  UK)    Readings:    • Heyen,  N.,  Kaika,  M.,  &  Swyngedouw,  E.  (2006).  Urban  political  ecology:  Politicizing  

    the  production  of  urban  natures.  In  the  nature  of  cities,  Taylor  &  Francis,  1-‐20  • Kaika,  M.  (2005).  City  of  flows.  Modernity,  nature  and  the  city.  Routledge,  New  

    York/London  • Swyngedouw,  E.  (1996).  The  city  as  a  hybrid:  on  nature,  society  and  cyborg  

    urbanization.  Capitalism  Nature  Socialism,  7(2),  65-‐80    

     ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  

    • Maria  Kaika:  Urban  political  ecology  and  radical  alternatives.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhxtIM5GPvk  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx0DUcO1_5I    

    • Erik  Swygendouw:  Political  ecology  and  the  contested  politics  of  urban  metabolism.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5cLdosjnJY  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e-‐vY9ySVeM    

               

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    7  

    Class  9:  Commons    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Massimo  De  Angelis  (School  of  Social  Sciences,  University  of  East  London,  UK)  • Stavros  Stavrides  (School  of  Architecture,  National  Technical  University  of  Athens,  

    Greece)    Readings:    • De  Angelis,  M.  (2012).  Crises,  movements  and  commons.  Borderlands  E-‐Journal:  New  

    Spaces  In  The  Humanities,  11(2),  4  • Stavrides,  S.  (2015).  Common  Space  as  Threshold  Space:  Urban  Commoning  in  

    Struggles  to  Re-‐appropriate  Public  Space.  Footprint  –  Commoning  as  Differentiated  Publicness,  Spring  2015,  pp.  9-‐20  

     ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:  

    • Massimo  De  Angelis:  Commons  and  social  movements.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6_gTm5zUJo  

    • Stavros  Stavrides.  Communities  of  Crisis,  Squares  in  Movement.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1dDpylQvG4    

       PART  III:  TOOLS  FOR  POLITICAL  ECOLOGY  RESEARCH    Class  10:  Methods  and  methodologies  ENTITLE  tutors:    • Giorgos  Kallis  (Institute  of  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  (ICTA),  

    Universitat  Autònoma  de  Barcelona,  Spain)  • Isabelle  Anguelovski  (Institute  of  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  (ICTA),  

    Universitat  Autònoma  de  Barcelona,  Spain)  • Rebecca  Lave  (Department  of  Geography,  Indiana  University  Bloomington,  USA)    Readings:    • Kallis,  G.,  Armiero,  M.,  Bridge,  G.  (2012).  Research  Design  Protocol.  ENTITLE  

    deliverable  report  D.2.1.  Available  at:  http://www.politicalecology.eu/documents/courses/91-‐d-‐2-‐1-‐research-‐design-‐protocol/file  

    • Gillham,  B.  (2000).  The  Research  Interview.  London:  Continuum    • Lave,  R.,  Wilson,  M.W.,  Barron,  E.S.,  Biermann,  C.,  Carey,  M.A.,  Duvall,  C.S.,  Johnson,  L.,  

    Lane,  K.M.,  McClintock,  N.,  Munroe,  D.  and  Pain,  R.  (2014).  Intervention:  Critical  physical  geography.  The  Canadian  Geographer/Le  Géographe  canadien,  58(1),  1-‐10  

     ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:    • Giorgos  Kallis:  Methodological  design  for  political  ecology  research.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIukM2VejHQ    • Isabelle  Anguelovski:  Interviewing.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJJYMLgTOvw    • Ayfer  Bartu:  Social  Anthropology.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRjE12p6SV8        

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    8  

    Class  11:  Communicating  political  ecology    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Giorgos  Kallis  (Institute  of  Environmental  Science  and  Technology  (ICTA),  

    Universitat  Autònoma  de  Barcelona,  Spain)  • Michele  Catanzaro  (Independent  Journalist  and  Science  Writer)  • Leah  Temper  (USC-‐Canada,  Seeds  of  Survival  Program,  Canada)    Readings:    • Curran  Bernard,  S.  (2007).  Story  Basics.  Documentary  storytelling–Making  stronger  

    and  more  dramatic  nonfiction  films  (2nd  Edition),  Elsevier,  15-‐32    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:    • Giorgos  Kallis:  Communicating  research  to  a  scientific  audience.  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbzapVRaN0w  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IfvUqrcm6Q    

    • Michelle  Catanzaro:  Science  communication  in  popular  media.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ7tVYdTaSs  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFfBc9HG9-‐U    

    • Crafting  the  political  ecology  documentary,  Leah  Temper  (SIC3  Barcelona).  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8vcwE4wpRA  and  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pm5xwETGwCs    

       Class  12:  What  is  the  role  of  political  ecologists?    ENTITLE  tutors:    • Paul  Robbins  (Nelson  Institute,  University  of  Wisconsin-‐Madison,  USA)  • Stephanie  Danielle  Roth  (Stop  TTIP,  European  Citizens’  Initiative)      Readings:    • Robbins,  P.  (2015).  The  Trickster  Science.  In:  Perreault,  T.,  Bridge,  G.,  &  McCarthy,  J.  

    (Eds.).  The  Routledge  handbook  of  political  ecology.  Routledge,  89-‐101    ENTITLE  audio-‐visual  support  material  for  the  class:    • Paul  Robbins:  How  can  Political  Ecology  change  policy?  The  role  and  limitations  of  

    the  social  scientist.    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6T-‐2nze7ig  

       

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.  

     

    9  

    Annex  I:  Expanded  political  ecology  reading  list    1. Adams,   P.,   1991,   Odious   debts:   loose   lending,   corruption,   and   the   third   world's  

    environmental  legacy.,  London,  Earthscan.  2. Adams,  W.M.   2008.  Green   Development:   environment   and   sustainability,   Routledge,  

    London  (3rd  edition)  (library)  3. Adams,   W.M.   and   Mulligan,   M.   (2003)   (eds.)   Decolonising   Nature:   strategies   for  

    conservation  in  a  postcolonial  era,  Earthscan,  London.  (chapters  go  from  Australia  to  Africa)  

    4. Adams,  W.M.,  Watson,   E.E.   and  Mutiso,   S.K.   1997.  Water,  Rules   and  Gender:  Water  Rights  in  an  Indigenous    

    5. Adams,  WM  1996.     Conservation   and  Development.   In  Adams  WM,  Goudie,  AS   and  Orme  AR  The  Physical  Geography  of  Africa  pp367-‐382    

    6. Adams,   WM.   2001.   Adams,   W.M.   (2008)   Green   Development:   environment   and  sustainability  in  a  developing  world,  Routledge,  London    

    7. Adams,   WM.   2004.   Against   Extinction.   Earthscan.   (best   history   of   conservation  movement)  

    8. Adger,  N.  2000.   Institutional  adaptation   to  environmental   risk  under   the   transition  Vietnam.  Annals  of  the  Association  of  American  Geographers.  90,  738-‐758.    

    9. Adger,   Neil,   Tor   A.   Benjaminsen,   Katrina   Brown,   et   al   2001   Advancing   a   Political  Ecology  of  Global  Environmental  Discourses.  Development  and  Change  32  4  draft   -‐  http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/publications/wp/gec/gec2000_10.pdf  

    10. Agarwal,   A,   S   Narain  &   A   Sharma.   1999   The   Polluter   Says   Principle   –   the   GEF.     in  Agarwal,   A   et   al   ed.  Green  Politics:   Global   Environmental  Negotiations   1.   Centre   for  Science   and   Environment,   India.   Chapter   summaries   at  http://www.cseindia.org/html/extra/gen.htm  

    11. Agrawal  A,  Chhatre  A,  Hardin  R.  2008.  Changing  Governance  of  the  World's  Forests.  Science  320:1460  

    12. Agrawal,   A.     2005     Environmentality   Community,   Intimate   Government,   and   the  Making    of  Environmental  Subjects  in  Kumaon,  India  Current  Anthropology  46,  2  

    13. Agrawal,   A.   2005.   Environmentality:   technologies   of   government   and   the  making   of  subjects.  Duke  University  Press  

    14. Agrawal,   A.   and   Gibson,   C.C.   1999   Enchantment   and   Disenchantment:   The   role   of  community  in  natural  resource  conservation.  World  Development,  Vol.  27,  NO.  4,  pp.  629-‐649.    

    15. Agrawal,  A.  and  Sivaramakrishnan,  K.  (eds.)  2000  Agrarian  environments  :  resources,  representations,  and  rule  in  India.  Durham,  NC  :  Duke  University  Press.    

    16. Agrawal,  B.  (1997).’Environmental  action,  gender  equity  and  women’s  participation’.  Development  and  change  28  (1):1-‐44.  

    17. Agyeman   J,   Robert   D.   Bullard   and   Bob   Evans   (eds.)   2003   Just   sustainabilities:  development  in  an  unequal  world.  MIT  Press.  

    18. Agyeman,   J   .   2005.   Sustainable   Communities   and   the   Challenge   of   Environmental  Justice  .  NYU  Press.  

    19. Agyeman,  J  and  Evans,  B.  (eds)  2003.  Just  Sustainabilities.  Earthscan  20. Agyeman,   J   (2013)   Introducing   just   sustainabilities:   policy,   planning   and  

    practice.    London.  Zed  Books  21. Agyeman,  J  and  McEntee,  J    (2014)  ‘Moving  the  field  of  food  justice  forward  through  

    the  lens  of  urban  political  ecology’  Geography  Compass  Vol.  8,  Issue  3  pp  211–220  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    10  

    22. Aiyer,   A.   2007.   The   Allure   Of   The   Transnational:   Notes   on   Some   Aspects   of   the  Political  Economy  of  Water  in  India.  Cultural  Anthropology  22,  No.  4,  pp.  640-‐658    

    23. Akimichi   T,   Ichikawa   M   (eds)   (2008)   Tonan-‐ajia-‐no-‐morini   naniga   okotte-‐irunoka  [What  is  happening  in  the  forests  of  Southeast  Asia].  Jinbun  Shoin,  Tokyo.  

    24. Alam,  Undala  Z  (2002)  Questioning  the  Water  Wars  Rationale:    A  Case  Study  of   the  Indus   Waters   Treaty.   The   Geographical   Journal   Vol.   168,   No.   4,   pp.   341-‐353  Ali,   Saleem   H   (2008)  Water   Politics   in   South   Asia:     Technocratic   cooperation   and  lasting  security  in  the  Indus  Basin  and  Beyond  Journal  of  International  Affairs  ›  Vol.  61  Nbr.  2,    

    25. Alexander,  J.  and  McGregor,  J.  (2000)  ‘Wildlife  and  politics:  CAMPFIRE  in  Zimbabwe’  Development  and  Change  31,  3:  pp.  605-‐607  

    26. Alimonda   H   (ed)   (2006)   Los   tormentos   de   la   materia:   aportes   para   una   ecología  política   latinoamericana   [The   torments   of   matter:   contributions   towards   a   Latin  American  political  ecology].  CLACSO,  Buenos  Aires.    

    27. Alimonda   H   (ed)   (2011)   La   naturaleza   colonizada:   ecología   política   y   minería   en  América   Latina   [Colonized   nature:   political   ecology   and  mining   in   Latin   America].  CLACSO,  Buenos  Aires.    

    28. Alonso  A,  V  Costa  and  D  Maciel  2005  The  Formation  of  the  Brazilian  Environmental  Movement  Working  Paper  259,  IDS  

    29. Arce,   A   and   Long,   N.   (eds)   1999.   Anthropology,   Development   and   Modernities;    Exploring  Discourse,  Counter-‐Tendencies  and  Violence.  London:  Routledge.  

    30. Ambinakudige  S  2011  National  Parks,  coffee  and  NTFPs:  the  livelihood  capabilities  of  Adivasis  in  Kodagu,  India.  J  Political  Ecology  18  Pp  1-‐10.  PDF    

    31. Anderson  E.N.  and  B  Anderson  2011  Development  and  the  Yucatec  Maya  in  Quintana  Roo:  some  successes  and  failures.  J  of  Political  Ecology  18.  Pp  51-‐65.  PDF  

    32. Andrew  McWilliam  and  Elizabeth  G.  Traube  (eds)  2011  Land  and  Life  in  Timor-‐Leste:  Ethnographic   Essays.   ANU   EPress   download   http://epress.anu.edu.au/titles/land-‐and-‐life-‐in-‐timor-‐leste  

    33. Angelo,  H.  and  Wachsmuth,  D.  (2014),  Urbanizing  Urban  Political  Ecology:  A  Critique  of   Methodological   Cityism.   International   Journal   of   Urban   and   Regional   Research.  doi:  10.1111/1468-‐2427.12105  

    34. Annear   C   2009   Navigating   constricted   channels:   local   cooption,   coercion,   and  concentration   under   co-‐management,   Mweru-‐Luapula   fishery,   Zambia.   Journal   of  Political  Ecology  16:  34-‐48.    PDF  

    35. Anseeuw,   W.   (2013).   The   Rush   for   Land   in   Africa:   Resource   grabbing   or   green  revolution?  South  African  Journal  of  International  Affairs,  No.  20:1,  159-‐177.  

    36. Arce,   A   and   Long,   N.   (eds)   1999.   Anthropology,   Development   and   Modernities;    Exploring  Discourse,  Counter-‐Tendencies  and  Violence.  London:  Routledge.  

    37. Austin   Dianne.   Integrating   Political   Ecology   and   Community-‐Based   Participatory  Research  on  the  U.S.-‐Mexico  Border.  in  Engaged  Political  Ecologies  Eds.  Batterbury  &  Horowitz  forthcoming  

    38. Bagla,   Pallava   (2010)   Along   the   Indus   River,   Saber   Rattling   Over   Water   Security.  Science   4   June   2010:   Vol.   328   no.   5983   pp.   1226-‐1227    Barton   JR,   Staniford  D    1998.  Net  deficits   and   the   case   for   aquacultural   geography.  Area  30  (2):  145-‐155    

    39. Bakker  K,   Braun  B,   McCarthy  J,   2005,   "Hurricane   Katrina   and   abandoned   being"  Environment  and  Planning  D:  Society  and  Space  23(6)  795  –  809  

    40. Bakker,   K.   (2003)   ‘From   archipelago   to   network:   Urbanization   and   water  privatization  in  the  South’  The  Geographical  Journal  169(4),  328  -‐  341.  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    11  

    41. Bakker,   K.   (2007),   The   “Commons”   Versus   the   “Commodity”:   Alter-‐globalization,  Anti-‐privatization  and  the  Human  Right  to  Water  in  the  Global  South.  Antipode,  39,  pp.430–455.  

    42. Bakker,   K.   1999   The   politics   of   hydropower:   Developing   the   Mekong”   Political  Geography  18(2),  209  –  232.    http://www.geog.ubc.ca/~bakker/Publications/  

    43. Bakker,  K.  2005  Neoliberalizing  nature?  Market  environmentalism  in  water  supply  in  England  and  Wales’  Annals  of  the  Association  of  American  Geographers.  95(3),  542  –  565.  http://www.geog.ubc.ca/%7Ebakker/PDF/neoliberalizing.pdf  

    44. Bakker,   K.   and  D.  Hemson  2000  Privatising  water:  Hydropolitics   in   the   new  South  Africa.   South   African   Journal   of   Geography   82   (1),   3   12.  http://www.geog.ubc.ca/~bakker/Publications/  

    45. Bakker,  K.  and  M.  Kooy  2005  Splintered  Networks?  Water,  Power,  and  Knowledge  in  Jakarta:   1870   –   1945   in   M   Gandy   Hydropolis.   Campus   Verlag.  http://www.geog.ubc.ca/~bakker/PDF/Kooy%20Bakker%20Batavia%20chapter.pdf  

    46. Baland,   J   and  Platteau,   J-‐P  1996  Halting  Degradation  of  Natural  Resources.  Oxford:  Clarendon   Press   and   FAO     [   Introduction;   Chapter   13;   General   Conclusion]      download  from  http://www.fao.org/docrep/x5316e/x5316e00.htm  

    47. Baquedano   M   (2002)   La   ecología   política   en   América   Latina   [Political   ecology   in  Latin  America].  Ilé  2  (2),  17–40.    

    48. Barnes,   J.,   2014.   Cultivating   the   Nile:   the   everyday   politics   of   water   in   Egypt.   Duke  University  Press.  

    49. Barnett   J   and  Adger  N.  2007.    Climate   change,  human  security  and  violent   conflict.  Political  Geography  26,  6,  639-‐655  

    50. Barney,   K   2014.   'Ecological   Knowledge   and   the   Making   of   Plantation   Concession  Territories   in   Southern   Laos.   Conservation   and   Society   12(4):   352-‐363.  http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-‐4923;year=2014;volume=12;issue=4;spage=352;epage=363;aulast=Barney  

    51. Barrow,  E,  Gichohi  H,   Infield  M.  2000  Rhetoric   or  Reality?  A   review  of  Community  conservation  policy  and  practice  in  E  Africa,.  Evaluating  Eden  series  5.  London:  IIED.  (SB)  

    52. Baruah,  B  1999.  The  Narmada  Valley  Project:  displacement  of  local  populations  and  impact  on  women.  Natural  Resources  Forum,  Vol.  23,  No.  1:  81-‐84.  

    53. Bassett  T  1988  The  Political  Ecology  of  Peasant-‐Herder  Conflicts   in  Northern  Ivory  Coast,  Annals  of  the  Association  of  American  Geographers,  78  (3),  78  (3):  pp.  453-‐472.    

    54. Bassett,   T   &   Zueli,   K.B.   2000.   Environmental   Discourses   and   the   Ivorian   Savanna.  Annals  of  the  Association  of  American  Geographers  90(1)  67-‐95    

    55. Bassett,  T.  1988.  The  political  ecology  of  peasant-‐herder  conflicts   in  northern  Ivory  Coast.  Annals  of  the  Association  of  American  Geographers.  78  (3):  pp.  453-‐472  

    56. Batterbury   S   (2004)   Panelist   remarks.   Cultural   and   political   ecology   at   the   AAG  century:   application   and   impact   in   the   world.   Available   at  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf.  

    57. Batterbury  SPJ    and  Fernando  JL  2004  A.  Escobar.  In  Kitchen  et  al,  Key  Thinkers  on  Space  and  Place.  Sage.    www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    58. Batterbury   SPJ   and   JL   Fernando.   2010.   Arturo   Escobar.   In   Hubbard   P   et   al   Key  Contemporary   thinkers   on   space   and   place.   London:   Sage.  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    59. Batterbury   SPJ   and   LS   Horowitz.   Forthcoming.   Engaged   Political   Ecologies.  Cambridge:  Open  Book  Publishers.    

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    12  

    60. Batterbury  SPJ  Interview    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apFTlnSPJQ0  61. Batterbury,  S.P.J    and  J.L.  Fernando.  2004.  Arturo  Escobar.   In  P.  Hubbard,  R.  Kitchin  

    and  G.  Valentine    (eds.)  Key  contemporary  theorists  on  space  and  place.  London:  Sage.  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    62. Batterbury,  S.P.J.  2001.    Landscapes  of  diversity:  a  local  political  ecology  of  livelihood  diversification   in   south-‐western  Niger.   Ecumene   8   (4):   437-‐464.  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    63. Batterbury,   S.P.J.   2004.   The   International   Institute   for   Environment   and  Development:   notes   on   a   small   office.   Global   Environmental   Change.   April.   (not  political   ecology,   but   I   though   I   would   throw   it   in   -‐  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  )  

    64. Batterbury,   S.P.J.   2008.   Sustainable   livelihoods:   still   being   sought,   ten   years   on.  Presented   at   Sustainable   Livelihoods   Framework:   ten   years   of   researching   the   poor  African   Environments   Programme   workshop,   Oxford   University   Centre   for   the  Environment,  24th  January  2008.  15pp.  

    65. Batterbury,   S.P.J.   2016.   Ecología   política:   relevancia,   activismo   y   posibilidades   de  cambio.     Ecología   Política   50:   45-‐54   (Political   ecology:   relevance,   activism,   and  possibilities  for  change-‐  English  version).    

    66. Batterbury,   SPJ   &   Bebbington,   AJ   1999.   Environmental   Histories,   Access   to  Resources,   and   Landscape   Change:   an   introduction.   Land   Degradation   and  Development  10  (4)  279-‐290  (online,  intro  at  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  )    

    67. Batterbury,   SPJ   &   T.Forsyth.   1999.   Fighting   Back:   human   adaptations   in   marginal  environments   Environment   41(6)   6-‐11,   25-‐30.  (www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf)  

    68. Batterbury,  SPJ  &  Warren,  A.  2001.  "Desertification".   in  N  Smelser  &  P  Baltes  (eds.)  The   International   Encyclopaedia   of   Social   and   Behavioral   Sciences.   Elsevier   Press    www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    69. Batterbury,   SPJ   and   Fernando,   JL.   2006.   Rescaling   governance   and   the   impacts   of  political  and  environmental  decentralization:  an  introduction    World  Development  34  (11):  1851-‐1863  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    70. Batterbury,  SPJ.  1998.  Local  Environmental  Management,  Land  Degradation  and  the  'Gestion   des   Terroirs'   Approach   in   West   Africa;   policies   &   pitfalls.   Journal   of  International  Development  10:871-‐898  (www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf)  

    71. Batterbury,  SPJ.  1998.  Local  Environmental  Management,  Land  Degradation  and  the  ‘Gestion   des   Terroirs’   Approach   in   West   Africa;   policies   &   pitfalls   Journal   of  International  Development  10:871-‐898    

    72. Batterbury,   SPJ.   2011.   Sustainable   Livelihoods;   arrival,   departure,   and   persistence.  Sustainable   Livelihood   Highlights.   Brighton:   IDS.   P2.   ISSN   1460-‐4205.   Presented   at  workshop   on   Sustainable   Livelihoods,   IDS,   Sussex   Univ,   26   Jan   2011.   Shortened   -‐  longer  version  Here  

    73. Bebbington  A   et   al   2008.  Mining   and  Social  Movements:   Struggles  Over  Livelihood  and   Rural   Territorial   Development   in     the   Andes   World   Development   .   35   (12)  http://people.ucsc.edu/~jbury/Publications/Bebbington,%20Bury%20et%20al,%202008,%20Mining%20and%20social%20movements,%20World%20Development.pdf  

    74. Bebbington  A.  2013.  Seminar,  ANU  http://vimeo.com/74912344  75. Bebbington   A.   Interview,   2011  

    http://www.mtnforum.org/sites/default/files/publication/files/mfbulletin2011_bebbington.pdf  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    13  

    76. Bebbington  AJ  and  Batterbury,  SPJ  2001.  Transnational   livelihoods  and   landscapes.  Ecumene  8(4)  369-‐492  www.simonbatterbury.net/pubs.pdf  

    77. Bebbington,   A,   L.   Dharmawan,   E.   Farmi   and   S.   Guggenheim   2006.   Local   capacity,  village   governance   and   the   political   economy   of   rural   development   in   Indonesia.  World  Development  (11):1958-‐1976.  

    78. Bebbington,   A.   1999   Capitals   and   Capabilities:   A   framework   for   analyzing   peasant  viability,  rural  livelihoods  and  poverty.  World  Development,  27,  12,  pp.  2021-‐2044.    

    79. Bebbington,  A.,  Hinojosa,  L.,  Bebbington,  D.  H.,  Burneo,  M.  L.  and  Warnaars,  X.  (2008),  Contention   and   Ambiguity:   Mining   and   the   Possibilities   of   Development.  Development  and  Change,  39:  887–914  

    80. Bebbington,   A.J.   2000.   Re-‐encountering   Development:   Livelihood   Transitions   and  Place   Transformations   in   the   Andes.   Annals   of   the   Association   of   American  Geographers.  90  (3)  495-‐520.    

    81. Bebbington,   AJ     numerous   papers   from   work   in   Ecuador   and   Bolivia,   2007-‐    http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/andes/about/    

    82. Bebbington,   AJ   2009.   Contesting   environmental   transformation:   political   ecologies  and   environmentalisms   in   Latin   America   and   the   Caribbean”  Latin   American  Research  Review  44(3):  177-‐186.    

    83. Bedoya  E,  Martinez  S   (1999)  La  ecología  política  y   la   critica  al  desarrollo   [Political  ecology  and  the  critique  of  development].  Debate  Agrario  29–30,  223–46.    

    84. Beebe,   Craig.   Paper   on   exurban   California,   Journal   of   Political   Ecology   2012.  http://jpe.library.arizona.edu  

    85. Beitl,  C.M.  2012.  Shifting  policies,  access  and  the  tragedy  of  enclosures  in  Ecuadorian  mangrove  fisheries:  towards  a  political  ecology  of  the  commons.    Journal  of  Political  Ecology  19:  94-‐113.  http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/volume_19/Beitl.pdf  

    86. Belsky,  J.M.    and  S.F.  Siebert.    2015.  A  Socio-‐Ecological  Analysis  of  an  Historic  Forest  Land   Use   and   Livelihood   in   Bhutan:   Lessons   for   Forest   Conservation   and  Development.     DRAFT   Report,   Global   Programme   on   Global   Economics   and   Social  Science,  IUCN,  Gland  Switzerland.  

    87. Belsky,   J.M.   2015.   Comparative   Perspectives   from   Bhutan   and   Montana:     Market  Forces  in  Community  Forestry.    Forest  Policy  and  Economics  58:29-‐36.  

    88. Belsky,   Jill  M.  1999.  Misrepresenting  communities:  the  politics  of  community-‐based  rural  ecotourism  in  Gales  Point  Manatee,  Belize.    Rural  Sociology  64:641-‐666.  

    89. Ben   Orlove   and   Steven   C.   Caton   2010.   Water   Sustainability:   Anthropological  Approaches  and  Prospects.  Annual  Review  of  Anthropology  Vol.  39:  401-‐415  

    90. Bene  C  2005  the  good  the  bad  and  the  ugly:  discourse,  policy  controversies  and  the  controversies  of  shrimp  farming.  Development  Policy  Review  23  585-‐614  

    91. Benjaminsen   TA   &   Ian   Bryceson   2012   Conservation,   green/blue   grabbing   and  accumulation  by  dispossession  in  Tanzania.  J  Peasant  Studies  39  2  :335-‐355  

    92. Benjaminsen,   T.A.,   Aune,   J.B.   and   Sidibé,  D.,   2010.   A   critical   political   ecology   of   cotton  and  soil  fertility  in  Mali.  Geoforum,  41(4),  pp.647-‐656.  

    93. Berhman     J,   Ruth   Meinzen-‐Dick   and   Agnes   Quisumbing     The   gender   implications   of  large-‐scale   land   deals,   Journal   of   Peasant   Studies  http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fjps20/current    

    94. Bernstein,  H  &  Woodhouse,  P.  2002.  Telling  Environmental  Change  Like  it  is.  Reflections  on  a  study  in  Sub-‐Saharan  Africa.  Journal  of  Agrarian  Change  1,2,283-‐324.  (the  only  substantial  critique  of  Leach/Scoones/Mearns  et  al)    

    95. Berry,   S  1993  No  Condition   Is  Permanent:  The  Social  Dynamics  of  Agrarian  Change   in  Sub-‐Saharan  Africa.  Madison:  University  of  Wisconsin  Press  [chapter  3]      

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    14  

    96. Beymer-‐Farris,   B.   and   Bassett,   T.   2013.   Environmental   narratives   and   politics   in  Tanzania’s  Rufiji  Delta:  A  reply  to  Burgess,  et.  al.  Global  Environmental  Change  

    97. Biersack  Aand  JB.  Greenberg,  eds.  2006.    ReImagining  Political  Ecology,  Duke  University  Press    

    98. Birkenholtz,  T.  2008.    Contesting  expertise:    The  politics  of  environmental  knowledge  in  northern  Indian  groundwater  practices.    Geoforum  39:  466-‐482.  

    99. Birkenholtz,  T.  2011.    Network  Political  Ecology:  Method  and  Theory  in  Climate  Change  Vulnerability  and  Adaptation  Research.  Progress  in  Human  Geography  36:  295–315  

    100. Bixler  ,  R.;  J  Dell’Angelo,  O.Mfune  and  H.  Roba.    The  political  ecology  of  participatory  conservation:  institutions  and  discourse.    Political  Ecology  Journal  22:  164-‐182.  

    101. Blaikie,   P.   2008   Epilogue:   Towards   a   future   for   political   ecology   that   works.  Geoforum.  Volume  39,  Issue  2,  765–772  

    102. Blaikie  P  2012.  Should  some  political  ecology  be  useful?      Geoforum  43  231–239  103. Blaikie,  P  1995.  Changing  Environments  or  Changing  Views?  A  Political  Ecology  for  

    Developing  Countries.    Geography    pp  203-‐214    104. Blaikie,  P  M  1985.  The  Political  Economy  of   Soil  Erosion.   London:  Longman   [widely  

    considered  to  be  a  classic  statement  of  the  political  ecology  perspective]    105. Blaikie,   P  M   1989   'Explanation   and   policy   in   land   degradation   and   rehabilitation',  

    Land  Degradation  and  Rehabilitation,  1,  1  pp  23-‐28      106. Blaikie,   P   M   1995b   Understanding   Environmental   Issues,   1-‐30   in,   Morse,   S   and  

    Stocking,  M  (eds)  People  and  Environment.  London:  UCL  Press  [for  a  recent  outline  of  Blaikie's  view]    

    107. Blaikie,  P  M  and  Brookfield,  H  1987.  Land  degradation  and  society.  London  108. Blaikie,  P.  (1985)  The  Political  Economy  of  Soil  Erosion  London,  Longman    109. Blaikie,   P.   1999  A   Review   of   Political   Ecology:   Issues,   Epistemology   and   analytical  

    narratives.  Zeitschrift  für  Wirtschaftsgeographie  43  (3-‐4):  131-‐147.    110. Blaikie,   P.   2006.   Is   small   really   beautiful?   Community-‐based   natural   resource  

    management  in  Malawi  and  Botswana.    World  Development  34(11)1942-‐1957.  111. Blaikie,  P.,  2001.    Social  Nature,  and  Environmental  Policy  in  the  South:    Views  from  

    Verandah  and  Veld,  in  Castree,  N.,  Braun,  B.  (eds),  Social  Nature:    Theory,  Practice  and  Politics,  pp.  133-‐150.    Oxford:    Blackwell    

    112. Blaikie,P,   J   Cameron   &D   Seddon.   2002.   Understanding   20   years   of   change   in   W-‐Central  Nepal.  World  Development  30(7)  1270-‐  

    113. Bloomer,   J.   2009.     Using   a   political   ecology   framework   to   examine   extra-‐legal  livelihood   strategies:   a   Lesotho-‐based   case   study   of   cultivation   of   and   trade   in  cannabis.  Journal  of  Political  Ecology  16.  Pp  49-‐69.  PDF  

    114. Boechler,   S.  &  Hansom,  A.M.   (eds.)  A  Political  Ecology  of  Women,  Water  and  Global  Environmental  Change,  London  and  New  York:  Routledge  

    115. Bohle,  H  and  H  Funfgeld.  2007.  The  political  ecology  of  violence  in  eastern  Sri  Lanka.  Development  and  change  38(6)  665-‐687  

    116. Bohle,  H  and  H  Funfgeld.  2007.  The  political  ecology  of  violence  in  eastern  Sri  Lanka.  Development  and  Change  38(6)  665-‐687  

    117. Bolten  C.  2009  The  agricultural  impasse:  creating  "normal"  post-‐war  development  in  Northern  Sierra  Leone.  J  of  Political  Ecology  16  Pp  70-‐86.  PDF  

    118. Borras   Jr,   S.  M.,  &  Franco,   J.   C.   (2013).  Global   land  grabbing  and  political   reactions  ‘from  below’.  Third  World  Quarterly,  34(9),  1723-‐1747.  

    119. Borras  Jr,  S.  M.,  Hall,  R.,  Scoones,  I.,  White,  B.,  &  Wolford,  W.  (2011).  Towards  a  better  understanding   of   global   land   grabbing:   an   editorial   introduction.   The   Journal   of  Peasant  Studies,  38(2),  209-‐216.  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    15  

    120. Borrini-‐Feyerabend,   G.,   Farvar,   M.T.,   Nguinguiri,   J.C.   and   Ndangang,   V.A.   2001   Co-‐management   of   natural   resources:   Organising,   negotiating   and   learning-‐by-‐doing.  GTZ   and   IUCN.   Heidelberg:   Kasparek   Verlag  http://nrm.massey.ac.nz/changelinks/cmnr.html   (This  volume   is  designed   to  assist  conservation   and   development   professionals   involved   in   multi-‐stakeholder  management  of  natural  resources)  

    121. Bram  Büscher    2014  Nature  on  the  Move:  The  Value  and  Circulation  of  Liquid  Nature  and  the  Emergence  of  Fictitious  Conservation    New  Proposals  PDF  20-‐36  

    122. Braun  B.  2005.  Environmental  issues:  writing  a  more-‐than-‐human  urban  geography.  Progress  in  Human  Geography  29(5):  635-‐650  [PDF]  

    123. Braun  B.  and  Castree,  N.  editors,  1999  Remaking  reality.  London:  Routledge.  (some  useful   chapters   on   the   social   constructionist   perspective   -‐   explained   in   Demeritt's  chapter)  

    124. Braun,  B.  2002:  The  intemperate  rainforest:  nature,  culture  and  power  on  Canada’s  west   coast.  Minneapolis:   University   of  Minnesota   Press.   (various   reviews   available  on-‐line)  

    125. Brechin  SR,  et  al,  2003.  Contested  Nature:  Promoting   International  Biodiversity  with  Social  Justice  in  the  Twenty-‐first  Century.  SUNY  Press.  details  (includes  ecotourism)  

    126. Brian   C.   Campbell   and   James   R.   Veteto.   2015.   Free   seeds   and   food   sovereignty:  anthropology   and   grassroots   agrobiodiversity   conservation   strategies   in   the   US  South.  Journal  of  Political  Ecology  22:  445-‐465.  PDF    

    127. Bridge   G.   2004.   Contested   terrain:  mining   and   the   environment.  Annual   Review   of  Environment  and  Resources  29  205-‐59    

    128. Bridge,   G.   (2007)   The   Economy   of   Nature:   from   Political   Ecology   to   the   Social  Construction  of  Nature.   In  Compendium  of  Economic  Geography   (Eds.  Lee,  Leyshon,  McDowell  and  Sunley).  Sage  

    129. Bridge,  G.  2000  Local  Dirt,  Global  Dreams:  mining  investment  and  land  use  change  in  Arizona.  Local  Environment  8(1)  61-‐83    

    130. Bridge,  G.  2000  The  Social  Regulation  of  Resource  Access  and  Environmental  Impact:  cases  from  the  U.S.  Copper  Industry.  Geoforum  31(2):  237-‐256    

    131. Bridge,   G.   2007.   Acts   of   enclosure:   claim   staking   and   land   conversion   in   Guyana's  gold   fields.   In  Neoliberal   Environments:   false   promises   and   unnatural   consequences.  Eds  Heynen,  McCarthy,  Prudham  and  Robbins.  Routledge.  

    132. Bridge,  G.  and  P.  McManus  (2000)  Sticks  and  Stones:  Environmental  Narratives  and  Discursive  Regulation  in  the  Forestry  and  Mining  Industries.  Antipode  32(1):10-‐47    

    133. Brock,   K     1999   Implementing   a   Sustainable   Livelihoods   Framework   for   Policy  Directed   Research:   Reflections   From   Practice   in   Mali   IDS   Working   Papers   -‐   90  http://www.ids.ac.uk/ids/bookshop/wp.html  

    134. Brockington  D,   Igoe   J.  Eviction   for  Conservation:  A  Global  Overview.  Conservat  Soc  [serial   online]   2006   [cited  2016   Apr   25];4:424-‐70.   Available  from:  http://www.conservationandsociety.org/text.asp?2006/4/3/424/49276  

    135. Brockington   D.   2008.   ‘Powerful   Environmentalisms.   Conservation,   Celebrity   and  Capitalism.’  Media,  Culture  and  Society  30  (4):  551-‐568.  PDF  

    136. Brockington   D.   2008.   Celebrity   Conservation.   Interpreting   the   Irwins.  Media  International  Australia.  127:  96-‐108.  PDF  (3.3  MB)  

    137. Brockington,   D.   ,   2009   Celebrity   and   the   Environment.   Fame,  Wealth   and   Power   in  Conservation.  Zed  

    138. Brockington,  D.  2002.  Fortress  Conservation.  The  preservation  of  the  Mkomazi  Game  Reserve.  James  Currey,  African  Issues  series.  Oxford  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    16  

    139. Brockington,  D.,  Duffy,  R.  and  Igoe,  J.  2008  Nature  Unbound.  Conservation,  Capitalism  and  the  Future  of  Protected  Areas.  Earthscan,  London.  

    140. Brockington,   D.,   J   Igoe,   K   Schmidt-‐Soltau.   2006"Conservation,   Human   Rights   and  Poverty  Reduction."  Conservation  Biology  20(1):  250-‐2  

    141. Brogden  M,  Greenberg  J.  2003.  The  fight  for  the  west:  A  political  ecology  of  land  use  conflicts  in  Arizona.    Human  Organization,    Fall  2003        

    142. Brown  K  Lapayade  S.  2001.  A   livelihood   from   the   forest.   (Cameroon)   J   Int  Dev  13:  1131-‐1149    

    143. Bryan,   J.  2015.    Participatory  Mapping.   In:  Perreault,  T.,  Bridge,  G.,  and  McCarthy,   J.  2015.  The  Routledge  Handbook  of  Political  Ecology.    Oxon  and  N.Y.,  Routledge.  Chap  19,  249-‐262  

    144. Bryant   RL   (2005)   Nongovernmental   Organizations   in   Environmental   Struggles.   Yale  University  Press,  New  Haven.    

    145. Bryant   RL   1998   Power   Knowledge   and   Political   Ecology:   a   review,   Progress   in  Physical  Geography  22  pp  79-‐94    

    146. Bryant,  R  &  Bailey,  S.  1997.  Multilateral  Institutions.  Pp76-‐102  In  Bryant,  R  &  Bailey,  S.  Third  World  Political  Ecology.  London:  Routledge  

    147. Bryant,  R  L  and  Bailey,  S  1997  Third  World  Political  Ecology.  London  and  New  York:  Routledge    

    148. Bryant,   R   L.   1997   The   political   ecology   of   forestry   in   Burma,   1824-‐1994.   London   :  Hurst  &  Company.  

    149. Elliot   JA.  &  M  Campbell  2002.  The  environmental   imprints  and  complexes  of  social  dynamics  in  rural  Africa:  cases  from  Zimbabwe  and  Ghana.  Geoforum  

    150. Bryant,  R.  (ed.)  2016  International  Handbook  of  Political  Ecology.  Edward  Elgar  151. Bryant,   R.L.   (1998)   ‘Power,   knowledge   and   political   ecology   in   the   third  world:   A  

    review  Progress  in  Physical  Geography  22,  1:  79-‐94  152. Bryant,  R.L.  1997  Beyond  the  impasse:  the  power  of  political  ecology  in  Third  World  

    environmental  research.  Area.  29,  1-‐15.    153. Bryant,   R.L.   and   Bailey,   S.   (1997)   Third   World   Political   Ecology:   An   Introduction  

    London,  Routledge  154. Bryant,   RL.   1992.   Political   Ecology:   An   emerging   research   agenda   in   Third-‐World  

    studies.  Political  Geography  11,  no.  1:  12-‐36.  (now  dated)  155. Bryceson,  D,  C  Kay  &  J  Mooij.  2000.  (eds)  Disappearing  Peasantries?  Rural  labour  in  

    Africa,  Asia  and  Latin  America.  London:  IT  Press.  (see  various  chapters)  (SB)  156. Bryceson,   D.F.   &   Jamal,   V.   1997.   Farewell   to   farms:   de-‐agrarianisation   and  

    employment  in  Africa.  Aldershot:  Ashgate  Press.    157. Bryceson,  D.F..  &  Bank,  L.  2001  End  of  an  Era:  Africa’s  development  policy  parallax.  

    Journal  of  Contemporary  African  Studies  19(1)  5-‐23  (library)  158. Bryceson,   D.H.     (1999)     African   rural   labour,   income   diversification   and   livelihood  

    approaches:   a   long   term   development   perspective,   Review   of   African   Political  Economy  80:  171-‐189.  

    159. Buckles,  D.  ed.  1999.  Cultivating  peace.  Conflict  and  collaboration  in  natural  resource  management.  Canada;  IDRC.  (useful  local  case  studies)  

    160. Bullard,   R.   undated.   Environmental   justice   in   the   21st   century.  http://www.ejrc.cau.edu/ejinthe21century.htm  

    161. Bumpus,  A.  G.  &  Liverman,  D.  M.  2011.  Carbon  colonialism?  Offsets,  greenhouse  gas  reductions  and,  sustainable  development.  In:  Global  Political  Ecology  (eds.  R.  Peet  et  al):  203-‐224.  London:  Routledge.  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    17  

    162. Bury   J   (2008)   Transnational   corporations   and   livelihood   transformations   in   the  Peruvian  Andes:   an   actor-‐oriented   political   ecology.  Human  Organisation   67,   307–21.    

    163. Buscher  B  and  Dietz  T  .  2005.  The  State  and  the  Conservation-‐development  Nexus  in  Southern  Africa  TES  4(2)  http://www.journal-‐tes.dk/vol_4_no_2/NO5_BR_l.PDF  

    164. Büscher,   B.   (2009)   ‘Letters   of   Gold:   Enabling   Primitive   Accumulation   through  Neoliberal   Conservation’,   Human   Geography   2(3):   91–93.   [order   it   from   library]  [interview]  

    165. Büscher,  B.  and  Dressler,  W.  (2012)  Commodity  Conservation.  The  Restructuring  of  Community  Conservation   in  South  Africa  and   the  Philippines.    Geoforum.  Vol  43(3):  367-‐376  

    166. Buscher,   B.,   Brockington,   D.,   Igoe,   J.,   Neves,   K.   and   Sullivan,   S.   2012.   Towards   a  consolidated   critique   of   Neoliberal   Biodiversity   Conservation.  Capitalism,   Nature,  Socialism  23  (2):  4-‐30.  PDF  

    167. Buscher,   B.,  Dressler,   W.,   and   Fletcher,   R   (2014).  Nature™   Inc:   New   Frontiers   of  Environmental   Conservation   in   the   Neoliberal   Age.  Tuscon:   University   of   Arizona  Press.  

    168. Byrne  J,  L  Glover  and  H  F.  Alroe.  2006  Globalization  and  sustainable  development:  a  political  ecology  strategy  to  realize  ecological   justice.   .     In  Niels  Halberg  et  al  (eds.),  Global   Development   of   Organic   Agriculture:   Challenges   and   Prospects.   Oxfordshire   :  CABI  Publishing.  Pp.  49-‐74.  

    169. Cárdenas  R  2012.  Green  multiculturalism:  articulations  of  ethnic  and  environmental  politics  in  a  Colombian  ‘black  community’    J  Peasant  Studies  39  2  309-‐333  

    170. Carney,  D.  1998.(ed)  Sustainable  Rural  Livelihoods  -‐  what  contribution  can  we  make?  London  :  DFID.  (sb)  

    171. Carney   LA,   Robert   A.   Voeks.2003   Landscape   legacies   of   the   African   diaspora   in  Brazil.  Progress  in  Human  Geography,  27,  Number  2,  pp.  139-‐152,  

    172. Caroline  Seagle  2012  Inverting  the  impacts:  Mining,  conservation  and  sustainability  claims   near   the   Rio   Tinto/QMM   ilmenite  mine   in   Southeast  Madagascar   J   Peasant  Studies  39  2  447-‐477  

    173. Carr,   E.R.   2015   Political   Ecology   and   Livelihoods.   In:   Perreault,   T.,   Bridge,   G.,   and  McCarthy,   J.   2015.   The   Routledge   Handbook   of   Political   Ecology.     Oxon   and   N.Y.,  Routledge.    Chap  25,  332-‐342.  

    174. Carrier,   J.  and  P.  West  (eds)  (2009)  Virtualism,  Governance  and  Practice:  Vision  and  Execution  in  Environmental  Conservation.  New  York  :  Berghahn  Books.    

    175. Castells,  M  1997  The  Power  of  Identity.  Oxford:  Blackwell  (the  classic  author  on  new  social  movements.  see  Ch.  3  )    

    176. Castree,  N.  2005.  Nature.  Routledge  Press.  177. Castree,  N.  2014.  Making  Sense  of  Nature.  New  York:  Routledge  178. Castree.  Noel  2003  Environmental   issues:   relational  ontologies  and  hybrid  politics.  

    Progress  in  Human  Geography,  27,  Number  2  ,  pp.  203-‐211  179. Chambers  R  2004     Ideas   for  Development:  Reflecting  Forwards   IDS  Working  Paper  

    238  180. Chambers  R.      Ideas  for  development.  Practical  Action  books.  181. Chambers,   R.   1997   Whose   Reality   Counts?   Putting   the   first   last.   London:  

    Intermediate  Technology  Publications.    182. Chandima   Daskon   &   Andrew   McGregor   2012   Cultural   Capital   and   Sustainable  

    Livelihoods   in   Sri   Lanka's   Rural   Villages:   Towards   Culturally   Aware   Development.  Journal  of  Development  Studies  48  4  pages  549-‐563      

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    18  

    183. Chartier  D,  Deléage  J-‐P  (eds)  (2010)  Les  écologies  politiques  aujourd'hui  (1):  France.  [Political  ecology  today  (1):  France].  Special  issue  of  Écologie  &  Politique  40,  15–113.    

    184. Chatterjee,   P.   and   M.   Finger   (eds.),   1994   The   Earth   Brokers:   Power,   Politics   and  World  Development  (London:  Routledge,).    

    185. Choi   B   (2001)   Shim-‐tseung-‐sengtehak   gwa   sengmul-‐pyeongdeung-‐mit   ja-‐ah-‐sil-‐hyeon-‐uroseo   yi   hwangeyong-‐jeong-‐yi   [Environmental   justice   as   deep   ecology,  ecological  equity,  and  self  realization].  Gonggan  gwa  Hwangyeong  16,  36–68.    

    186. Cleaver,   F.   2000   Moral   ecological   rationality,   institutions   and   the   management   of  common   property   resources.   Development   and   Change,   Vol.   31,   361-‐383   (Takes  critical  view  of  institutional-‐economistic  approaches  to  CPR  management.  With  case  study  on  water  management  in  Zimbabwe)  

    187. Colfer,  C.  and  R.D.  Minarchek.  2013.    Introducing  the  “the  gender  box”:  a  framework  for  analyzing  gender  roles  in  forest  management.    International  Forest  Management  15:  411-‐425.  

    188. Collins   T   W   2008   The   political   ecology   of   hazard   vulnerability:marginalization,  facilitation  and  production  of  differential  risk  to  urban  wildfires   in  Arizona's  White  Mountains,  J  of  Political  Ecology  16  pp  21-‐43.  PDF.  

    189. Conde,   M   and   Kallis,   G.,   2012.   The   global   uranium   rush   and   its   African   frontier.  Effects,   reactions   and   social  movements   in   Namibia.  Global   Environmental   Change,  22(3):  596-‐610.  

    190. Connell  J  and  Waddell,  E  (eds)  Environment,  Development  and  Change  in  Rural  Asia-‐Pacific:  Between  Local  and  Global.  Routledge  [excellent  case  studies  and  dedicated  to  Harold  Brookfield]  

    191. Connell,  J.  2006.  Holding  onto  modernity?  Siwai,  Bougainville,  PNG,  in  Connell  J  and  Waddell,   E.   (eds)   Environment,   Development   and   Change   in   Rural   Asia-‐Pacific:  Between  Local  and  Global.  Routledge.  127-‐146.  [very  good  long  term  study]  

    192. Contreras  AP  (1998)  Imagining  a  Filipino  political  ecology:  a  critical  analysis  of  the  prospects  for  political  science  in  environmental  studies  in  the  Philippines.  Journal  of  Environmental  Science  and  Management  1,  11–15.    

    193. Corson  Catherine  &  Kenneth   Iain  MacDonald   2012  Enclosing   the   global   commons:  the  convention  on  biological  diversity  and  green  grabbing.  Journal  of  Peasant  Studies  39,  2,  263-‐283  

    194. Cote,   M.   and   A.J.   Nightingale.   2012.   Resilience   Thinking   Meets   Social   Theory:  Situating   Social   Change   in   Socio-‐Ecological   Systems   (SES)   Research.   Progress   in  Human  Geography  36(4):475–489.  

    195. Cotula,  L  &  Vermeulen,  S.  (2011).  Contexts  and  procedures  for  farmland  acquisitions  in  Africa:  What  outcomes  for  local  People?  Development,  54(1),  40-‐48  

    196. Cotula,   L.   (2013).   The   Great   African   Land   Grab?   Agricultural   Investments   and   the  Global  Food  System.  London:  Zed  Press.    

    197. Cotula,   L.,Oya,   C.,   Codjoe.,   with     Kakraba-‐Ampeh,   M.,Keeley,   J.,   Kidewa,   L.,  Makwarimba,  M.,  Seide,  W.,  Nasha,  W.,  Asare,  R.,  &  Rizzo,  M.  (2014).  Testing  claims  about   large   land   deals   in   Africa:   Findings   from   a   multi-‐country   study.   Journal   of  Development  Studies,  50,  7,  903-‐925  

    198. Craig   Thorburn   1996     Understanding   Forest   Resourse-‐use   Change   in   Indonesia:   A  Political  Ecology  Approach.  Unpublished  PhD,  University  of  California,  Los  Angeles  

    199. D’Alisa,  G.  and  Kallis,  G.,  2016.  A  political  ecology  of  maladaptation:  Insights  from  a  Gramscian  theory  of  the  State.  Global  Environmental  Change,  38,  pp.230-‐242  

    200. D’Alisa,  G.  Demaria,  F.   and  G.  Kallis   (eds),  2014.  Degrowth.  A  vocabulary   for  a  new  era,  Routledge-‐Earthscan.  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    19  

    201. Dalby,   Simon   2002   Conflict,   Ecology   and   the   Politics   of   Environmental   Security.  Global  Environmental  Politics,  Vol.  2  (4),  p125-‐131  [review  essay]  

    202. Daly   H   E.   1994   Farewell   Lecture   To   the   World   Bank.   January   14.  http://www.dieoff.org/page64.htm    George   Sand   F   Sabelli,   1994     Faith   and   Credit:   The   World   Bank's   Secular   Empire  (London:  Penguin,).    

    203. Daly,   H   E.     1991.   Steady-‐State   Economics,   2nd   Edition   (Washington,   DC:   Island  Press,),  Chapter  13  pp.  241-‐60    

    204. Daly,   Herman   1994   `Fostering   Environmentally   Sustainable   Development:   Four  Parting  Suggestions  for  the  World  Bank'  Ecological  Economics  10,  3,  pp.  183-‐87.    

    205. de   Castro   F   ,   DG   McGrath.   2003   Moving   toward   sustainability   in   the   local  management   of   floodplain   lake   fisheries   in   the   Brazilian   Amazon.   Human  Organization.  62,  2;123  –    

    206. Depietri,  Y.,  Kallis,  G.,  Baró,  F.  and  Cattaneo,  C.,  2016.  The  urban  political  ecology  of  ecosystem  services:  The  case  of  Barcelona.  Ecological  Economics,  125,  pp.83-‐100.  

    207. De   Schutter,   O.   (2009).   Large-‐scale   land   acquisitions   and   leases:   A   set   of   core  principles  and  measures  to  address  the  human  rights  challenge.  United  Nations    

    208. De  Schutter,  O.  (2011).  How  not  to  think  of  land-‐grabbing:  Three  Critiques  of  large-‐scale  investments  in  farmland,  The  Journal  of  Peasant  Studies,  38:2,  249  –  279.  

    209. Demeritt,   D.   1994:   The   nature   of   metaphors   in   cultural   geography   and  environmental  history.  Progress  in  Human  Geography  18,  163–85  

    210. Derman  B,  A  Ferguson  2003  Value  of  water:   Political   ecology   and  water   reform   in  Southern  Africa  Human  Organization  62  (3):    277-‐    

    211. DFID's   website   and   clearinghouse-‐   Livelihoods   Connect    http://www.livelihoods.org/    

    212. Dietz   Tom   2001   Thinking   about   environmental   conflicts.   In   Lisa   M.   Kadous   (ed.).  Celebrating   Scholarship.   Fairfax,   Virginia:   George   Mason   Univ.  http://www.dietzkalof.org/Thinking_about_environmental_conflict.pdf  

    213. Diprose,   G.   &   McGregor,   A.   2009   Dissolving   the   sugar   fields:   Land   reform   and  resistance  identities  in  the  Philippines.  Singapore  Journal  of  Tropical  Geography  30,  52-‐69.  

    214. Dixon,   R.   and   McGregor,   A.   (2011),   Grassroots   Development   and   Upwards  Accountabilities:   Tensions   in   the   Reconstruction   of   Aceh's   Fishing   Industry.  Development  and  Change,  42:  1349–1377.  doi:  10.1111/j.1467-‐7660.2011.01739.x  

    215. Dooliitle   AA   2005.   Property   and   Politics   in   Sabah,  Malaysia:   Native   Struggles   over  Land  Rights.  University  of  Washington  Press.    

    216. Doornbos,   M.,   Saith,   A.   and   White,   B.   2000   Forest   Lives   and   Struggles:   An  introduction.  Development  and  Change,  31,    1,  pp.  1-‐10  

    217. Dowie,   M   1995   Losing   Ground:   American   Environmentalism   at   the   End   of   the  Twentieth   Century.   Cambridge,   MA:   MIT   Press    Dwived,   Ranjit   (1999).   Displacement,   risks   and   resistance:   Local   perceptions   and  actions   on   the   Sardar   Sarovar   (Gujarat),   India.   Development   and   Change  30(1)(January)    

    218. Dressler,  W.  and  B.  Buscher.  2008.  Market   triumphalism  and   the  CBNRM   ‘crises’  at  the   South   African   section   of   the   Great   Limpopo   Transfrontier   Park.   Geoforum   39:  452–465.  

    219. Dressler,  W.,  Büscher,  B.,  Schoon,  M.,  Brockington,  D.  Hayes,  T.  Kull,  C.,  McCarthy,  J.  and  Streshta,  K.  (2010)  From  Hope  to  Crisis  and  Back?  A  Critical  History  of  the  Global  CBNRM  Narrative.    Environmental  Conservation.  Vol.  37(1):1-‐11.  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    20  

    220. Dressler,  W.,  To,  P.,  and  Mahanty,  S.   (2013).  How  Biodiversity  Conservation  Policy  Accelerates   Agrarian   Differentiation:   An   Account   of   an   Upland   Village   in  Vietnam.Conservation  and  Society.  Vol.  11  (2):  130-‐143    

    221. Dressler,  W;  Buscher,  B;    Schoon,  M;    Brockington,  D;  Hayes,  T;  Kull,  C.A.;  McCarthy,  J.;  and  Shrestha,  K.  2010.    From  hope  to  crisis  and  back  again?  A  critical  history  of  the  global  CBNRM  narrative.    Environmental  Conservation  37:  5-‐15.  

    222. Dressler,  W.,  To,  P.,  and  Mahanty,  S.   (2013).  How  Biodiversity  Conservation  Policy  Accelerates   Agrarian   Differentiation:   An   Account   of   an   Upland   Village   in  Vietnam.Conservation   and   Society.  Vol.   11   (2):   130-‐143  http://www.conservationandsociety.org/article.asp?issn=0972-‐4923;year=2013;volume=11;issue=2;spage=130;epage=143;aulast=Dressler;type=0  

    223. Duffy,  R.  2000.  Killing  for  Conservation:  Wildlife  policy  in  Zimbabwe.  Oxford:  James  Currey.    

    224. Dundon,  Alison.  2002.  Mines  and  Monsters:  A  Dialogue  on  Development  in  Western  Province,  Papua  New  Guinea.  The  Australian  Journal  of  Anthropology,  13(20):  139-‐154  

    225. Dvera   Saxton.   2015.   Ethnographic  movement  methods:   anthropology   takes   on   the  pesticide  industry.  Journal  of  Political  Ecology  22:  368-‐388.  PDF    

    226. Eden,   Sally   2011.   The   politics   of   certification:   Consumer     knowledge,   power,   and  global  governance  in  ecolabeling.  In  Global  Political  Ecology  (eds.  R.  Peet  et  al):  169-‐184.  London:  Routledge.  

    227. Edmunds,   D.   and   Wollenberg,   E.   2001   A   strategic   approach   to   multistakeholder  negotiations.  Development  and  Change,  32,  2,  pp.  231-‐253    

    228. Edwards  F  and  D  Mercer  2010  Meals  in  Metropolis:  mapping  the  urban  foodscape  in  Melbourne,Australia.  Local  Environment  15,  No.  2,  February  2010,  153–168  

    229. Edwin   Nuijten   2010   Gender   and   management   of   crop   diversity   in   The   Gambia.  Journal  of  Political  Ecology  17    Pp.  42-‐58.  PDF  

    230. Ellis   F.   1998   Survey   Article:   Household   Strategies   and   Rural   Livelihood  Diversification.  The  Journal  of  Development  Studies  35  (1):  1-‐38  

    231. Ellis   F.   1999.   The   Determinants   of   Rural   Livelihood   Diversification   in   Developing  Countries.  Journal  of  Agricultural  Economics.    

    232. Ellis,   F.   2000.   Rural   livelihoods   and   diversity   in   developing   countries.   Oxford  University  Press.    

    233. Emanuel   R   M.and   J   B.   Greenberg.   2000   Lluvia   Enojada-‐Tyoo   Kuasi':   The   Political  Ecology   of   Forest   Extraction   in   the   Sierra   Chatina,   Oaxaca,   Mexico   J   of   Political  Ecology  7    http://jpe.library.arizona.edu  

    234. Emel   J,   Kreuger   R   2003   Spoken   but   not   heard:   the   promise   of   the   precautionary  principle   for   natural   resource   development.   Local   Environment   Vol.   8   1,   p9,   17p  [mining  in  Montana]  

    235. Eom   E   (2008)   Ban-‐gwansan—jiyok-‐wundong-‐gwa   dajungjeok-‐skeyil-‐jeok-‐yondae  [Anti-‐community  mining  community  and  multi-‐scalar  solidarity:  political  ecology  of  RapuRapu  project  in  the  Philippines].  Space  and  Society  30,  177–212.    

    236. Erin  R.  Eldridge.  2015.  The  continuum  of  coal  violence  and  post-‐coal  possibilities  in  the  Appalachian  South.  Journal  of  Political  Ecology  22:  279-‐298.  PDF  

    237. Ervine   K   2011   Conservation   and   conflict:   the   intensification   of   property   rights  disputes   under  market-‐based   conservation   in   Chiapas,   México.   Journal   of   Political  Ecology  18  .  Pp  66-‐80.  PDF    

    238. Escobar   A   (2006)  Difference   and   conflict   in   the   struggle   over   natural   resources:   a  political  ecology  framework.  Development  49  (3),  6–13.    

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    21  

    239. Escobar  A  (2010)  Postconstructivist  political  ecologies.   In  Redclift  MR,  Woodgate  G  (eds)   International   Handbook   of   Environmental   Sociology,   2nd   edition,   91–105.  Edward  Elgar,  Cheltenham.  

    240. Escobar   A   1996   in   Peet,   R   and  Watts,  M   1996   Liberation   Ecologies:   Environment,  development,  social  movements.  London  and  New  York:  Routledge    

    241. Escobar   A.   2001   Culture   sits   in   places.   Political   Geography   20     139–174  http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/text/eng/escobar_culture_sits_in_places.pdf  

    242. Escobar   A.   2008   Territories   of   difference   place,   movements,   life,   redes.   Duke  University   Press.   Draft   (600pp)   at  http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/text/eng/places_regions.doc    

    243. Escobar  in  Spanish  -‐  http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/html/texts.htm  244. Escobar,  A    The  World  Social  Forum:  Challenging  Empires    245. Escobar,  A.  1998  Whose  Knowledge,  Whose  Nature?  Biodiversity,  Conservation,  and  

    the   Political   Ecology   of   Social   Movements.   Journal   of   Political   Ecology  http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/  

    246. Escobar,  A.  1999  After  Nature:  Steps  to  an  Anti-‐essentialist  Political  Ecology.    Current  Anthropology  40  (1):  1-‐30      

    247. Escobar,  Arturo  1996/2004.      chapter   in  Peet  R  and  Watts  MJ.  Liberation  Ecologies.  Routledge  

    248. Escobar,  Arturo  1998  Whose  Knowledge,  Whose  Nature?  Biodiversity,  Conservation,  and   the   Political   Ecology   of   Social    Movements.   Journal   of   Political   Ecology   online  www.jpe.library.arizona.edu.au  

    249. Escobar,   Arturo   1999.   After   Nature:   Steps   to   an   Anti-‐essentialist   Political   Ecology.  Current   Anthropology   40(1):   1-‐30.    http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/text/eng/afternature.pdf  

    250. Espeland,  WN  1998  The  Struggle  for  Water:  Politics,  Rationality,  and  Identity  in  the  American  Southwest.  Chicago  University  Press.  (about  the  failed  Orme  Dam  plan)  

    251. Evans,  P.  1996  Government  Action,  Social  Capital,  and  Development:  Reviewing  the  evidence  on  synergy.  World  Development.  24,  6,  pp.  1119-‐1132  

    252. Evenden  MD  2004  Fish  Versus  Power:  An  Environmental  History  of  the  Fraser  River.  Cambridge  University  Press  (Canada  river)  

    253. Fabio   de   Castro,D,   G   McGrath.2003   Moving   toward   sustainability   in   the   local  management   of   floodplain   lake   fisheries   in   the   Brazilian   Amazon.   Human  Organization.  62,  2;  123  –    

    254. Fairbairn,  M.  (2013).  Indirect  dispossession:  Domestic  power  imbalances  and  foreign  access  to  land  in  Mozambique.  Development  and  Change,  44(2),  335-‐356.  

    255. Fairhead  J  2001  International  dimensions  of  conflict  over  natural  and  environmental  resources.  In  Peluso  N  and  Watts  MJ.  (eds)  Violent  Environments.  Cornell  University  Press.  213-‐236  Or    

    256. Fairhead   J   and   M   Leach.   1995.   "False   forest   history,   complicit   social   analysis:  rethinking   some   West   African   environmental   narratives."   World   Development.  23(6):1023-‐1035    

    257. Fearnside   P   2003   Conservation   Policy   in   Brazilian   Amazonia:   Understanding   the  Dilemmas,  World  Development  31,  5,  757-‐923  

    258. Feintrenie,   L.   (2014).   Agro-‐industrial   plantations   in   central   Africa:   risks   and  opportunities.    

    259. Fairhead,   James,   Melissa   Leach   and   Ian   Scoones   (2012)   ‘Green   Grabbing:   A   new  appropriation  of  nature?’  Journal  of  Peasant  Studies  39(2)  

  • The  views  expressed  in  this  document  are  of  the  author(s),  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the  views  of  the  European  Commission.    

     

    22  

    260. Few,  R.  2001.  Containment  and  counter-‐containment:  planner/community  relations  in  conservation  planning.  The  Geographical  Journal  167:  111–124.  

    261. Filer  C  2012.  Why  green  grabs  don't  work  in  Papua  New  Guinea.    J  Peasant  Studies  39  2  599-‐617  

    262. Fischer,  F  and  Hajer,  M.A.  (eds.)  1999  Living  with  nature:  environmental  politics  as  cultural  discourse.  New  York:  Oxford  University  Press    

    263. Fisher,   W.     2001.   Diverting   Water:   Revisiting   the   Sardar