FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN TULSA FUEL AND ...

FINAL

REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN

TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING COLLINSVILLE, OKLAHOMA

February 2012

Prepared for

Oklahoma

Department of Environmental Quality

DCS Project # 12069C / PO# 2929014842

Burns & McDonnell Project No. 64496 Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company

Engineers-Architects-Consultants Kansas City, Missouri

Remedial Design Work Plan Table of Contents Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_TOC.docx TC-1 02/06/2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................... TC-4 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. TC-4 LIST OF SUPPORTING STAND ALONE DOCUMENTS .................................................... TC-4 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................. TC-5 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Overview of RD Project .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Final Cleanup Levels ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Description of Selected Remedy ............................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Work Plan Organization .......................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Overview of Remedial Design Process ................................................................... 1-5

2.0 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 2-1

2.1 Site Description ....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Surface Features .......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Meteorology ................................................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Surface Water Hydrology ............................................................................ 2-3 2.1.4 Geology ....................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.5 Soil ............................................................................................................... 2-4 2.1.6 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.7 Demography and Land Use ......................................................................... 2-5 2.1.8 Ecology ........................................................................................................ 2-6

2.2 Site History .............................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.1 Past and Current Site Activities ................................................................... 2-7 2.2.2 Regulatory History ...................................................................................... 2-8

2.3 Physical and Chemical Data to be Used in RD ....................................................... 2-10 2.3.1 Hydrology, Geology, and Hydrogeology .................................................... 2-11 2.3.2 On-Site Soil and Waste Materials ............................................................... 2-11 2.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment ....................................................................... 2-12 2.3.4 Ground Water .............................................................................................. 2-13

3.0 TASK NARRATIVE ....................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Introduction (SOW Task 1.0) .................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Project Planning and Support (SOW Task 2.0) ....................................................... 3-1

3.2.1 Project Planning (SOW Task 2.1) ............................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Site-Specific Plans (SOW Task 2.2)............................................................ 3-1 3.2.3 Project Management (SOW Task 2.3) ......................................................... 3-2 3.2.4 Subcontractor Activities (SOW Task 2.4) ................................................... 3-2

3.3 Community Involvement (SOW Task 3.0) .............................................................. 3-4 3.4 Data Acquisition (SOW Task 4.0) ........................................................................... 3-4

3.4.1 Site Reconnaissance (SOW Task 4.2.1) ...................................................... 3-5 3.4.1.1 Topographic Survey ....................................................................... 3-5 3.4.1.2 Visual Waste Survey ...................................................................... 3-5



TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page No.

3.4.2 Geological Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.2) ............................................... 3-6 3.4.2.1 Surface/Subsurface Soil Sampling ................................................. 3-6 3.4.2.2 Sediment Sampling ......................................................................... 3-8

3.4.3 Hydrogeological Investigation-Ground Water (SOW Task 4.2.3) .............. 3-8 3.4.4 Hydrogeological Investigation-Surface Water (SOW Task 4.2.4) .............. 3-10 3.4.5 Waste Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.5) ....................................................... 3-10 3.4.6 Ecological Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.6) ................................................ 3-10 3.4.7 Investigation Derived Waste (SOW Task 4.2.7) ......................................... 3-11

3.5 Sampling Analysis (SOW Task 5.0) ........................................................................ 3-11 3.6 Analytical Support and Data Validation (SOW Task 6.0) ...................................... 3-11 3.7 Data Evaluation (SOW Task 7.0) ............................................................................ 3-12 3.8 Treatability Study and Pilot Testing (SOW Task 8.0) ............................................. 3-13 3.9 Preliminary Remedial Design (SOW Task 9.0) ...................................................... 3-15

3.9.1 Design Criteria Report (SOW Task 9.1) ..................................................... 3-15 3.9.2 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 9.1.5) .................................................. 3-16 3.9.3 Preliminary Plans and Specifications (SOW Task 9.1) ............................... 3-16

3.9.3.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Construction Schedule (SOW Tasks 9.1.1 and 9.1.2) ........................................................................................ 3-16

3.9.3.2 Design Specifications Outline (SOW Task 9.1.3) .......................... 3-16 3.9.3.3 Preliminary Drawings (SOW Task 9.1.4) ...................................... 3-16 3.9.3.4 Cost Estimate (Sow Task 9.1.6) ..................................................... 3-16 3.9.3.5 Variances with Record of Decision (SOW Task 9.2) ..................... 3-17

3.9.4 Comment Response, Design Review, and Briefing (SOW Tasks 9.5 and 9.6) 3-18 3.10 Equipment, Services, and Utilities (SOW Task 10.0) ............................................. 3-18 3.11 Intermediate Remedial Design (SOW Task 11.0) ................................................... 3-18

3.11.1 Intermediate Plans and Specifications (SOW Task 11.0) ............................ 3-18 3.11.1.1 Update Construction Schedule (SOW Task 11.1) .......................... 3-19 3.11.1.2 Design Specifications (SOW Task 11.2) ........................................ 3-19 3.11.1.3 Drawings (SOW Task 11.3) ........................................................... 3-19 3.11.1.4 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 11.4) ...................................... 3-19 3.11.1.5 Revised Cost Estimate (SOW Task 11.5) ....................................... 3-19 3.11.1.6 Variances with Record of Decision (SOW Task 11.8) ................... 3-20

3.11.2 VE Study (If Needed) (SOW Task 11.7) ..................................................... 3-20 3.11.3 Comment/Response, Design Review, and Briefing (SOW Tasks 11.6 and 11.9) 3-20

3.12 Prefinal and Final Remedial Design (SOW Task 12.0) ........................................... 3-20 3.12.1 Prefinal Designs and Specifications (SOW Task 12.1) ............................... 3-21

3.12.1.1 Design Specifications (SOW Task 12.1) ........................................ 3-21 3.12.1.2 Drawings (SOW Task 12.2) ........................................................... 3-21 3.12.1.3 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 12.3) ...................................... 3-21 3.12.1.4 Revised Cost Estimate (SOW Task 12.4) ....................................... 3-21 3.12.1.5 Bidability, Operability, and Constructability Reviews(SOW Task 12.8) 3-22 3.12.1.6 Revised Delivery Strategy and Schedule (SOW Task 12.9) .......... 3-22 3.12.1.7 Document VE Modifications (SOW Task 12.10) ........................... 3-22 3.12.1.8 Draft O&M Manual (SOW Task 12.11) ......................................... 3-22 3.12.1.9 Construction Quality Assurance Plan (SOW Task 12.12) .............. 3-22

3.12.2 Prefinal Design Review (SOW Task 12.6) .................................................. 3-23



TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page No.

3.12.3 Final Design / 100% Design Submittal (SOW Task 12.5) .......................... 3-23 3.12.4 Subcontract Award Documents (SOW Task 12.7) ...................................... 3-23

3.13 Postremedial Design Support (SOW Task 13.0) ..................................................... 3-23 3.14 Contract Closeout (SOW Task 14.0) ....................................................................... 3-24

4.0 SCHEDULE ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Sequential Approach................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Schedule Assumptions ............................................................................................. 4-1

5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Project Staffing ........................................................................................................ 5-1 5.1.1 BMcD Project Manager .................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.2 BMcD Engineering Manager .......................................................................... 5-1 5.1.3 BMcD Field Site Manager / Project Geologist ............................................... 5-1 5.1.4 BMcD Health and Safety Manager ................................................................. 5-2 5.1.5 BMcD Site Health and Safety Supervisor ...................................................... 5-2 5.1.6 BMcD Quality Control Director ..................................................................... 5-3 5.1.7 BMcD Project Chemist ................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.8 BMcD Project Engineer .................................................................................. 5-3 5.1.9 BMcD Project Team ....................................................................................... 5-4

5.2 Project Coordination ................................................................................................ 5-5 5.2.1 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality .......................................... 5-5 5.2.2 United States Environmental Protection Agency............................................ 5-5

5.3 Project Team Activities ........................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.1 Routine Team Meetings .................................................................................. 5-6 5.3.2 Community Involvement Activities ................................................................ 5-7 5.3.3 Monthly Progress Reports .............................................................................. 5-7 5.3.4 Invoicing ..................................................................................................... 5-7 5.3.5 Project Team QA/QC Reviews During Project Execution ............................. 5-7

5.3.5.1 Routine Observations and “On The Spot” Corrections ..................... 5-7 5.3.5.2 Field Reviews .................................................................................... 5-8 5.3.5.3 Office Reviews .................................................................................. 5-8 5.3.5.4 Report Reviews .................................................................................. 5-9 5.3.5.5 Design Reviews ................................................................................. 5-9 5.3.5.6 Corrective Actions ............................................................................. 5-10

5.4 Assurances to the Government ................................................................................ 5-10

6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 6-1

APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Select Figures from Remedial Investigation Report APPENDIX B - American Burying Beetle Survey Report



LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title

1-1 Cleanup Levels for Chemicals of Concern 3-1 Geological and Waste Investigations 3-2 Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations 4-1 Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule 4-2 Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence

LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Figure

2-1 Site Location Map 2-2 Site Topography Aerial Photographic Map 2-3 Site Feature Map 2-4 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (0 – 0.5 ft bgs) 2-5 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (0.5 – 2 ft bgs) 2-6 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (2 – 4 ft bgs) 2-7 RI Soil Results vs. RAOs (> 4 ft bgs) 2-8 Estimated Depth of Waste Materials 2-9 RI Sediment Results vs. RAOs 2-10 RI Monitoring Wells 3-1 Soil and Waste Sample Location Map 3-2 Sediment Sample Location Map 3-3 Boring and Monitoring Well Location Map 4-1 Project Schedule 5-1 Organization Chart

LIST OF SUPPORTING STAND ALONE DOCUMENTS

Consultant Statement of Work – Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2011,

Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site, August.

Feasibility Study Report – Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Feasibility Study Report for Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. October.

Record of Decision – United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2008. Record of Decision. Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site, Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. November.

Remedial Investigation Report – Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Remedial Investigation Report for Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. August.



LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ABB American Burying Beetle ARAR applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry bgs below ground surface BMcD Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. CA Cooperative Agreement CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information

System CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIH Certified Industrial Hygienist CIP Community Involvement Plan COC chain of custody CQA construction quality assurance CSI Construction Specification Institute DCS Oklahoma Department of Central Services DMP Data Management Plan DQCR Daily Quality Control Report DQO data quality objective EEO Equal Employment Opportunity oF degrees Fahrenheit FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FS Feasibility Study FSM Field Site Manager FSP Field Sampling Plan gpm gallons per minute HASP Health and Safety Plan HRS Hazard Ranking System HSM Health and Safety Manager IC Institutional Control IDW investigation-derived waste LTM long-term monitoring MCACES Microcomputer Aided Cost Estimating System mg/kg milligrams per kilogram g/L micrograms per liter mph miles per hour msl mean sea level



LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (continued) NELAP National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program NOE Notice of Exemption NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPL National Priorities List NWCC National Water and Climate Center NWS National Weather Service OAC Oklahoma Administrative Code OCC Oklahoma Conservation Commission OCS Oklahoma Climatological Society ODEQ Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality O&M Operation and Maintenance ONHI Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory OSDH Oklahoma State Department of Health P&ID piping and instrumentation diagram PA Preliminary Assessment PPE personal protective equipment PRP Potentially Responsible Party QA quality assurance QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan QC quality control RA remedial action RAO remedial action objectives RD remedial design RI Remedial Investigation ROD Record of Decision SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SDB Small Disadvantage Business SEL State Environmental Laboratory SHSS Site Health and Safety Supervisor SI Site Inspection SMP Site Management Plan SOP standard operating procedure SOW Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel &

Manufacturing Superfund Site START Superfund Technical Assistance and Response Team TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure TFM Site Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma TGS Tulsa Geological Survey USCB United States Census Bureau USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency



LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (continued) USGS United States Geological Survey VE Value Engineering yd3 cubic yards

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan Introduction Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_01.docx 1-1 02/06/2012

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), under contract with the Oklahoma Department

of Central Services (DCS) Construction and Properties Division (DCS Project #12069C / PO#

2929014842) on behalf of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), will conduct a

remedial design (RD) for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing site in Collinsville, Oklahoma (TFM Site).

The RD is 100 percent federally funded through a Cooperative Agreement (CA) between the ODEQ and

the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

1.1 OVERVIEW OF RD PROJECT

A remedial investigation / feasibility study (RI/FS) was undertaken at the TFM Site from 2005 through

2007, and a Record of Decision (ROD) that describes the selected remedy for the TFM Site based on the

RI/FS was issued by the USEPA on November 24, 2008. The purpose of this RD Work Plan is to set

forth the requirements for the RD of the selected remedy as defined in the ROD. The RD is generally

defined as those activities to be undertaken to develop the final plans and specifications, general

provisions, and special requirements necessary to translate the ROD into the remedy to be constructed

under the Remedial Action (RA) phase. Specifically, this RD involves the design of a consolidation cell

and cap of TFM Site soil, sediment, and waste materials and waste materials present on properties

contiguous to the TFM Site that are contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, and/or lead. This RD Work

Plan is designed to provide the framework for conducting the RD activities at the TFM Site.

Tasks to be performed during the RD, which are detailed in Section 3.0, include the following:

Task 1 – Introduction

Task 2 – Project Planning and Support

Task 3 – Community Involvement

Task 4 – Data Acquisition

Task 5 – Sampling Analysis

Task 6 – Analytical Support and Data Validation

Task 7 – Data Evaluation

Task 8 – Treatability Study and Pilot Testing

Task 9 – Preliminary Design

Task 10 – Equipment, Services, and Utilities

Task 11 – Intermediate Design


WP_01.docx 1-2 02/06/2012

Task 12 – Prefinal and Final Design

Task 13 – Post RD Support

Task 14 – Project Closeout

The RD will be performed in accordance with the Consultant Statement of Work for the Remedial Design

for the Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site ([SOW] ODEQ, 2011) and consistent with the ROD

(USEPA, 2008). In addition, the RD will be performed in accordance with the Remedial

Design/Remedial Action Handbook (USEPA, 1995) and other guidance issued by USEPA regarding

conducting an RD. The RD Work Plan was also prepared to satisfy the requirements of the

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as

amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986.

The goal is to complete and deliver the final plans and specifications for the RD, including RA contract

documents within 24 months, dependent on funding availability from USEPA, after approval of the RD

Work Plan. The estimated completion for this work assignment to contract closeout is 26 months.

1.2 FINAL CLEANUP LEVELS

Remedial action objectives (RAOs) are the cleanup objectives for protection of human health and the

environment. ODEQ and USEPA developed RAOs for TFM Site soil, sediment, surface water, and waste

material. Cleanup levels were established for both residential and nonresidential soil. These site-specific

cleanup levels are the desired endpoint concentrations for each exposure route that are believed to provide

adequate protection of human health and the environment. Although the TFM Site is currently unused

vacant land, it is reasonable that future land use may be zoned residential based on development interest

in the general area. Cleanup to residential levels will result in partial unlimited use, unrestricted

exposure, and will be protective for human and terrestrial ecological receptors. The cleanup levels for the

TFM Site are presented on Table 1-1.

Materials such as broken retorts and condensers, slag, and other smelter related materials represent a

primary source material at the Site (USEPA, 2008). Although the contaminated soils present at the Site

represent a source material, they are not characterized as a “principal threat waste” because the resulting

soil contamination associated with this smelter material can be reliably contained (USEPA, 2008). For

purposes of the RD, waste materials that cannot be sampled can be identified by a visual standard. As

such, any visible waste material associated with the historical smelter operation will be addressed during

the RA for the TFM Site. A summary of the RAOs for the TFM Site are provided in the following

paragraphs:


WP_01.docx 1-3 02/06/2012

On-Site Soil and Waste Materials: Protect human health by preventing direct contact, through

the ingestion or inhalation exposure pathways with arsenic, cadmium, and lead contaminated on-

site soil and waste material by reducing arsenic, cadmium, and lead concentrations to residential

levels less than 37 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 75 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg, or to

nonresidential levels less than 200 mg/kg, 560 mg/kg, and 1,000 mg/kg, respectively. In addition

to numerical cleanup levels, visible waste associated with the historical smelter operation will be

addressed during the RA for the TFM Site (USEPA, 2008).

Sediment: Protect human health and the environment by preventing direct contact, through the

ingestion pathway, with arsenic, cadmium, and lead contaminated sediment by reducing arsenic,

cadmium, and lead concentrations to levels less than 181 mg/kg, 813 mg/kg, and 500 mg/kg,

respectively (USEPA, 2008).

Surface Water: Protect human health and the environment by preventing direct contact, through

the ingestion pathway, with contaminated surface water by reducing cadmium concentrations to

levels less than 238 micrograms per liter (µg/L).

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REMEDY

The selected remedy for the TFM Site was described in the ROD, and this remedy addresses the TFM

Site as one operable unit to manage the current and potential future residential risks associated with

exposure to soil, sediment, surface water, and waste. Approximately 200,000 cubic yards (yd3) of waste

material, including soil, sediment, and waste will be addressed through on-site consolidation and capping.

The consolidation and capping alternative meets RAOs and cleanup levels by preventing exposure and

contaminant migration. The alternative is cost effective; will provide a permanent remedy; and, is

effective in the short-term and long-term by containing contamination on-site by consolidation, capping,

and treating material, if necessary (USEPA, 2008).

Based on data obtained during the RI, the soil, sediment, and waste materials to be consolidated may

exceed the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level and may be a

characteristic hazardous waste under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.24. Prior to

consolidation and capping, confirmation TCLP sampling will be conducted on the soil, sediment, and

waste material1. Based on the results, the material will be treated with high pH substance or other

1 Only waste material that is sufficiently small enough to not require manipulation such as crushing, grinding, or sieving will be submitted to the laboratory for TCLP analysis. Preparation steps that involve physically changing


WP_01.docx 1-4 02/06/2012

stabilization compound if necessary before consolidation and capping. Since materials are being left on-

site, long-term monitoring (LTM), site inspections, operation and maintenance (O&M), institutional

controls (ICs), and five-year reviews will be required (USEPA, 2008).

A summary of each of the remedies for the on-site materials is provided in the following paragraphs:

On-Site Soil and Waste Materials: The selected remedy for on-Site soil and waste materials

includes the consolidation and capping of approximately 164,000 yd3 of soil and waste materials

that exceed the cleanup levels for residential or nonresidential arsenic, cadmium, and lead. The

materials will be excavated, analyzed for TCLP, stabilized if TCLP results exceed criteria

established in 40 CFR 261.24, and consolidated and capped on site. Confirmation soil sampling

will be conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and all

contaminated soil and waste material has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell

(USEPA, 2008).

Sediment and Surface Water: The selected remedy for the on-Site Ponds, Mid-Site Ravine, and

Strip Mine Pit includes on-site fixation or stabilization and on-site disposal of approximately

33,000 yd3 materials that exceed the sediment cleanup levels. The areas will be dewatered;

sediment will be excavated; materials will be analyzed for TCLP and stabilized if TCLP results

exceed criteria established in 40 CFR 261.24; and consolidated and capped on site. Confirmation

sampling will be conducted in each area of excavation to ensure cleanup levels have been met and

all contaminated sediment has been removed and placed within the consolidation cell (USEPA,

2008).

1.4 WORK PLAN ORGANIZATION

The RD Work Plan provides the technical approach for completing the RD, including a summary of

historical information, cleanup objectives, selected remedy, additional data collection needs for the RD,

project schedule, and a project management. The sections of the RD Work Plan are as follows:

Section 1.0 – Introduction: This section provides an overview of the RD, a description of the

selected remedy, a summary of final cleanup levels, and an overview of the RD process.

the particle size of the tested material creates samples that are not representative of site conditions and fundamentally alters the sample’s analytical performance. Therefore, only waste materials with small particle size, having the appearance of soil, will be submitted for laboratory analysis of TCLP.


WP_01.docx 1-5 02/06/2012

Section 2.0 – Background: This section summarizes current knowledge of the TFM Site,

including: location, general description, past and current site activities, regulatory history, and a

summary of physical and chemical data to be used in the RD.

Section 3.0 - Task Narrative: This section summarizes the key tasks to be performed during the

RD, including: introduction; project planning and support; community involvement; data

acquisition; sampling analysis; analytical support and data validation; data evaluation; treatability

study and pilot testing; preliminary design, identification/procurement of long-lead equipment,

services, and utilities needs; intermediate design; prefinal and final design; post remedial design

support; and, project closeout.

Section 4.0 – Schedule: This section summarizes the schedule for completing the RD tasks.

Section 5.0 – Project Management: This section summarizes project organization and

management structure to complete the RD.

Section 6.0 – References: This section presents the references used to prepare the RD Work

Plan.

1.5 OVERVIEW OF REMEDIAL DESIGN PROCESS

The primary elements of the selected remedy as documented in the ROD, which will need to be included

in the RD are as follows:

Excavation and consolidation of materials

TCLP testing and stabilization, if needed

Capping

ICs

Site inspections

Long-term O&M and monitoring

5-Year Reviews

The RD process for these elements will follow a planning, investigation, evaluation/reporting, and design

sequence with agency review of project documents as they are submitted. An outline of this process is

provided in the following paragraphs. Additional details regarding the schedule and sequential approach

to the RD process is provided in Section 4.0, and a description of project management is provided in

Section 5.0:


WP_01.docx 1-6 02/06/2012

Step 1 - Project Planning: The initial RD efforts involve project planning including evaluation of

existing information; a site visit and scoping meeting with ODEQ; identification of additional

data needs; development of a RD Work Plan, Site Management Plant (SMP), Health and Safety

Plan (HASP), Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP), Field Sampling Plan (FSP), and Data

Management Plan (DMP); submittal of planning documents to ODEQ; and, modification to

planning documents based upon commentary and discussion with ODEQ.

Step 2 – Data Acquisition/Field Investigation: Immediately following finalization of the planning

documents, subcontractor procurement, and coordination with the Oklahoma State Environmental

Laboratory (SEL), data acquisition will commence. These activities include an American

Burying Beetle (ABB) survey to determine presence/absence of this endangered species on the

TFM Site; topographical survey of the TFM Site; visual reconnaissance and survey to identify

areas of visible waste materials; additional characterization of soil and sediment to more

accurately delineate the volume of materials requiring remediation as well as any stabilization

requirements; a geological and hydrogeological investigation to meet the requirements of

Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) Title 252. Department of Environmental Quality, Chapter

515. Management of Solid Waste, Subchapter 7. Subsurface Investigation (OAC 252:515-7);

ground water sampling to provide seasonal information regarding ground water conditions at the

TFM Site; and, sampling and analysis of on-site materials for potential use in the cap for the

consolidation cell. Coordination with the SEL will be performed throughout the data acquisition

phase.

Step 3 – Data Evaluation / Reporting: Upon receipt of data from the SEL, the data will be

validated in accordance with procedures established in the site-specific QAPP. A Data

Evaluation Report that presents the evaluation of data collected will be submitted to ODEQ for

review. It is likely that two Data Evaluation Reports will be prepared: one to discuss the results

of soil, sediment, waste, and geological data and a second report to present the findings of the

ground water monitoring. The Report(s) will provide additional information regarding the

vertical extent of volume of materials requiring remediation, an estimate of the volume of

materials requiring stabilization, and an evaluation of information required to comply with OAC

252:515-7.

Step 4 – Treatability Study / Pilot Testing: After finalization of the RD Work Plan, work will

commence on the Treatability Study Work Plan. The plan for testing stabilization amendments

will be submitted to ODEQ for review, and the plan will be finalized following commentary and


WP_01.docx 1-7 02/06/2012

discussion with ODEQ. After approval of the Treatability Study Work Plan, bench scale testing

of each of the add-mixtures will be performed. Upon identification of a suitable product, field

testing will be performed at the TFM Site to determine viability of the recommended stabilization

amendment. A Treatability Study Evaluation Report will be developed following the field test,

and the report will be submitted to ODEQ for review. The Treatability Study Evaluation Report

will be finalized following commentary and discussion with ODEQ.

Step 5 – Design: The design process will be initiated immediately following the Treatability

Study / Pilot Testing. The design process is broken down into three phases:

- The Preliminary Design begins with the initial design and ends with the completion of

approximately 30 percent (%) of the design effort. Deliverables during the Preliminary

Design include the Design Criteria Report, Basis of Design Report, Preliminary Plans and

Specifications, Value Engineering (VE) Screening Report, and response to design review

comments. Design review meetings will be held with ODEQ during the Preliminary Design

process. Following ODEQ’s approval of the Preliminary Design, a list of long-lead

procurement items will be developed and submitted to ODEQ. After approval of this list,

plans and specifications for the procurement of these long-lead items will be developed.

- The Intermediate Design begins at the completion of the Preliminary Design phase and ends

with the completion of approximately 60% of the total design effort, and submittal of

intermediate plans and specifications to ODEQ. If determined to be appropriate, a VE Study

will be conducted and the report prepared by an independent VE group that is not otherwise

participating in the RD. During the Intermediate Design, a number of design review

meetings will be held with ODEQ. Included within these review meetings are reports for the

following design review: Initial Constructability Review, Initial Bidability Review, Initial

Operability Review, Initial Environmental Review, and Initial Claims Prevention Screening.

- Prefinal Plans and Specifications (i.e., 90% design) will be produced following response to

the design review comments to the Intermediate Design. Also included with the Prefinal

Design are reviews of bidability, operability, and constructability and preparation of a Draft

O&M Manual and Construction Quality Assurance Plan. The Prefinal Design will function

as the draft version of the Final Design (i.e., 100% design submittal). After ODEQ review

and comment on the Prefinal Design and following a review meeting with ODEQ, the Final

design (i.e., 100% design) shall be submitted. All Final Design documents will be approved

by a Professional Engineer registered in Oklahoma. After ODEQ approval of the Final

Design, subcontract award documents will be prepared.


WP_01.docx 1-8 02/06/2012

Step 6 – Post RD Support: If requested by ODEQ after the Final Design, Post RD Support will

be provided to consist of support required to prepare contract bidding documents and issue the

Invitation for Bids or Request for Proposals. These activities include presolicitation activities;

preaward activities; updates to site-specific SMP, QAPP, FSP, HASP, and/or Community

Involvement Plan (CIP); and, construction phase services.

Step 7 – Contract Closeout: Following all planning, investigation, design, and post-design

support activities, the contract closeout process will be initiated. This process includes returning

any documents to ODEQ; duplication, distribution, and storage of files; archiving of relevant

records; and preparation of a project Closeout Report.

On-going activities throughout the RD process include:

- Weekly status calls and monthly progress reports to the ODEQ Project Manager; and,

- Community involvement activities, including participation in two public meetings and

assistance with fact sheets at the beginning of the RD and at the completion of the RD.

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan Background Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_02.docx 2-1 02/06/2012

2.0 BACKGROUND

The purpose of this section of the RD Work Plan is to present relevant site background information,

including: site description, site history (operational and regulatory), and previous investigation

information that will be useful in developing the RD.

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.1.1 Surface Features

As indicated in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information

System (CERCLIS) database, the location for the TFM Site is approximately 1-1/3 miles south of

downtown Collinsville in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The TFM Site is located in the NE1/4 SE1/4 NE1/4

Section 31 and SW1/4 NW1/4 Section 32 Township 22 North Range 14 East in Tulsa County, Oklahoma,

and has the coordinates of 36° 20’ 45.59” north latitude and 95° 50’ 51.28” west longitude. As shown on

Figure 2-1, the area within the TFM Site boundary consists of approximately 60.7 acres and is bounded

by “Old” U.S. Highway 169 and the Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe railroad tracks (currently operated by

WATCO) to the east; a flooded strip mine pit from a former coal mining operation to the south; and,

agricultural and residential lots to the north and west (Oklahoma State Department of Health [OSDH],

1992 and ODEQ, 2011). Additionally, property owned by the Faith Assembly Church property bounds

the TFM Site to the north. The Collinsville Smelter, which is another former zinc smelter, is located

approximately one-fourth mile to the east-northeast of the TFM Site (Figure 2-1) on 220 acres of property

formerly owned by the Bartelsville Zinc Company, and it is undergoing investigation and remediation

(ODEQ, 2011).

The majority of the facility structures have been demolished. Previous studies have indicated that

portions of the site are covered with waste consisting of broken retorts and condensers, slag, building

debris, ash, bricks, and other materials from the former smelting operations (BMcD, 2007). This waste

area is located to the south of the access road/driveway (Figures 2-2 and 2-3). During the RI, waste

materials were visually observed at the surface or within borings or trenches across approximately 25

acres. In addition, the access road/driveway was observed to contain waste materials. The waste varies in

thickness from 2-feet to greater than 6-feet. The waste piles are not covered, and run-off is uncontrolled.

The waste borders the southern strip mine pit, and portions of the waste have collapsed into the

impoundment. This impoundment, which receives surface water runoff from the TFM Site, is reportedly

a local fishery and flows into an intermittent drainage ditch that borders on the eastern edge of the waste

(BMcD, 2007). An intermittent stream originates in this area and flows approximately ¾ mile before


WP_02.docx 2-2 02/06/2012

draining into Blackjack Creek, which is located east of the TFM Site (Figures 2-1 and 2-2). Three

intermittent ponds, which are assumed to be remnants of a 2-million gallon reservoir, are located north of

the former smelter operations area (BMcD, 2007). In addition, two smaller ephemeral ponds are located

on the TFM Site (Figure 2-3). The area north of the access road/driveway is vegetated with grasses

(Figure 2-3). With the exception of the southern boundary at the strip mine pit, a 6-foot chain link fence

surrounds the TFM Site.

A residence (Figures 2-2 and 2-3), which was occupied from 1935 through February 2002, was located on

the site near the former office building (paymaster hut). The on-site residence was destroyed by a fire and

is currently unoccupied. The residence has a water well that was used in the past for drinking water, but it

is no longer in use. No other residential structures are located on the Site; however, a garage and a few

storage sheds remain adjacent to the former residence (ODEQ, 2011). A cistern is located just north of

the mid-site ravine intermittent drainage that travels west to east across the former operation area of the

TFM Site (Figure 2-3). Waste material at the TFM Site has impacted soil, sediment, and surface water.

Ground water at the TFM Site has not been impacted (ODEQ, 2011).

2.1.2 Meteorology

Located in northeast Oklahoma, approximately 22 miles north of Tulsa, the TFM Site primarily has a

continental climate, with pronounced daily and seasonal temperature changes. Summers are hot and

fairly humid, with average high temperatures in July and August above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (oF) and

average low temperatures slightly above 70 oF during these months. Winters are fairly short and mild,

with January typically being the coldest month. The average high temperature in January is 48 oF, and the

average low temperature is 27.5 oF (National Weather Service [NWS], 2011).

Severe weather storms with strong winds, hail, thunder/lightning storms, and tornadoes occur primarily

between the months of March and June. From 1888 to present, the average annual rainfall was 40.9

inches. May was the wettest month, with average monthly rainfall of 5.9 inches (NWS, 2011). The

record 24-hour rainfall was 9.27 inches and occurred during the month of May. Between 1950 and 2010,

72 tornadoes were reported in Tulsa County, which averages just over one per year (Oklahoma

Climatological Society [OCS], 2011).

Snowfall is infrequent, with an average of approximately 9.7 inches per year. Snow primarily occurs

from December through March. January has the highest monthly average snowfall of 2.7 inches (NWS,

2011).


WP_02.docx 2-3 02/06/2012

Prevailing surface winds as measured at the Tulsa International Airport are from the south at an average

approximate velocity of 10.7 miles per hour (mph) (National Water and Climate Center [NWCC], 2005).

In the winter months from November through March, winds are variable with predominant directions

from the south, south-southeast, north, and north-northwest. During the spring season from April to May,

winds are predominantly from the south and south-southeast. During the summer and fall, there is also a

south-southwesterly component to the predominant winds (NWCC, 2005).

2.1.3 Surface Water Hydrology

Surface water is present at the TFM Site in several ponds and intermittent drainages. A surface

impoundment from a former strip mining pit comprises the southern boundary of the TFM Site. Water

from this strip pit impoundment flows into an intermittent drainage ditch that borders the eastern edge of

the site near the waste piles (ODEQ, 1994). Three intermittent ponds, which are assumed to be remnants

of an old reservoir, are located in the area north of the former smelter operations area and south of the

access road/driveway (Labeled as Ponds 1, 2, and 3 on Figures 2-2 and 2-3). Pond 3 contains a retort

embankment, which were serving as part of the bank structure for the pond. During a site visit in October

2011, Pond 1 was nearly dry and Ponds 2 and 3 were dry due to a drought in the area (BMcD, 2011).

Additionally, two smaller ephemeral ponds have been identified on the property, one located just

northwest of the larger three ponds (Pond 4) and the other located near the western boundary of the TFM

Site (Pond 5). Based on observations during RI activities, these ponds are likely only present for brief

periods following rain events. Ponds 4 and 5 were dry during RI Phase I sampling activities, and samples

had to be collected during the rainy season in May 2006. These ponds were also observed to be dry

during the October 2011 site visit.

A culvert passes under the Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad and Old US 169, and surface water from

the TFM Site passes through this culvert and onto a ponded area on Tulsa County Plat 34010 in Sec 32

T22N R14E, portions of which were owned by the former Bartelsville Zinc Company. Northern flow

from this ponded area was observed during a rain event in May 2006.

The overall surface drainage is to the east, towards Blackjack Creek, a meandering stream located

approximately one-third of a mile to the east of the TFM Site (Figure 2-1). Blackjack Creek flows

northerly for approximately five miles until it meets Horsepen Creek, which in turn flows approximately

two miles easterly before meeting the Caney River (ODEQ, 1994). The Caney River has been designated

for the following uses by the State of Oklahoma: public and private water supply, warm water aquatic

community, Class I irrigation, industrial and municipal process and cooling water, primary body contact


WP_02.docx 2-4 02/06/2012

recreation beneficial use, and aesthetics beneficial use (OAC, 2004). The major recreational water body

in the Collinsville area is Oolagah Lake, located approximately 15 miles to the northeast. Oolagah Lake

is also the source of drinking water for the city of Collinsville and the rural water supplies (OSDH, 1992).

The TFM Site in located in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) zone C area of minimal

flooding (Tulsa Geological Survey [TGS], 1972).

2.1.4 Geology

Collinsville is located in the North American Central Lowlands physiographic province. The terrain is

characterized by nearly level uplands, bottomlands around the major streams, and gentle, rolling hills.

The TFM Site topography is generally flat with an elevation of approximately 650 feet above mean sea

level (msl) and elevations within a one-mile radius of the TFM Site ranging from 620 to 740 feet msl.

According to the geologic map of Oklahoma, the geologic strata underlying the TFM Site consists of

shale and sandstone with interbedded coal deposits of the Pennsylvanian-aged Seminole Formation

(Miser, 1954). The Seminole Formation, generally exhibiting a thickness of 200 feet, is divided into an

upper sandstone, a middle shale, and a basal sandstone (TGS, 1972). The middle shale zone locally

contains the Dawson Coal, up to 30 inches thick, which was mined locally in the Collinsville area.

Underlying the Seminole Formation is the Pennsylvanian Holdenville Shale, composed of shale with

minor sandstone and limestone strata.

Based on information obtained during the RI, bedrock was encountered beneath the TFM Site at depths

ranging from 7.2 to 12.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Initial bedrock encountered at the TFM Site

consisted primarily of shale, with a few instances of sandstone and limestone (BMcD, 2007).

2.1.5 Soils

The TFM Site vicinity is underlain by unconsolidated overburden that primarily consists of silt, clay, silty

loam, and shale sediments and residuum. The unconsolidated overburden at the TFM Site is relatively

thin and consist primarily of the Kanima Series and the Okemah-Parson-Carytown complex and Dennis-

Radley complex (USDA, 1977). In addition, a small area of the Kanima series was also identified at the

south of the property, closest to the Strip Mine Pit. Soils of the Okemah-Parsons-Carytown complex

consist of acidic, silty loam to silty clay and are typically found on slopes between 0 and 1 percent. Soils

of the Dennis-Radley complex consist of loamy and clayey sediments under native grasses and cover of

oak trees and are typically found on very gently sloping uplands and floodplains. The Kanima soils

consist of a shalely, silty clay loam, have moderate to low permeability, and normally form on slopes

greater than 3 percent within strip mining areas.


WP_02.docx 2-5 02/06/2012

Smelter operation waste material, consisting of broken retorts and condensers, slag, building debris, ash,

and bricks was identified within the southeast area of the TFM Site (refer to Figure 2-3). The occurrence

of the waste material increased toward the southeast of the TFM Site, where discrete zones of slag

material were encountered. Where encountered, the discrete zones of slag material were primarily found

at or near the ground surface with thicknesses ranging from approximately 0.5 feet to 7.0 feet bgs.

Smelter operation waste material was also identified along the access road/driveway located within the

TFM Site boundaries.

Geologic cross-sections of the TFM Site were provided in the RI Report (BMcD, 2007) to detail the

approximate depths and locations of soils and waste material encountered. A copy of the geologic cross-

sections and a plan view of the geologic cross-section profile locations is provided in Appendix A.

2.1.6 Hydrogeology

No major bedrock or alluvial aquifers lie beneath the TFM Site. The Seminole Formation, the upper

bedrock aquifer beneath the TFM Site, consists of shale, sandstone, and thin coal beds and has a thickness

of approximately 200 feet. The Seminole Formation reportedly yields small amounts of fair to poor

quality water and has been designated Class IIB as a minor use general basin (OAC, 2004). There are no

municipal or other public water wells or Wellhead Protection Areas within a 4-mile radius of the TFM

Site. A water well search conducted during the RI identified several private wells located within a one-

mile radius of the TFM Site, including a residential well located on the TFM property. The identified

wells varied in depth from 32 feet to 200 feet bgs and exhibited yields ranging from one to 40 gallons per

minute (gpm). No yield data was available from the on-site residential well.

Currently there are seven monitoring wells associated with the TFM Site: six shallow monitoring wells

that were installed at the base of the overburden material and one deep monitoring well that was installed

within bedrock. Based on data collected during the RI, the occurrence of ground water beneath the TFM

Site is very limited; however, it does appear to be continuous across the TFM Site. Ground water flow

beneath the TFM Site occurs in a south/southeasterly direction (BMcD, 2007). Potentiometric surface

maps generated during the RI are provided in Appendix A.

2.1.7 Demography and Land Use

The TFM Site is located approximately 1-1/3 miles south of downtown Collinsville. According to the

2010 Census, Collinsville has a population of 5,606 (United States Census Bureau [USCB], 2011) and

experienced a population increase of approximately 37.5% between the 2000 and 2010 census. Of these,

approximately 27.8% are under the age of 18. Collinsville covers approximately 3 square miles of


WP_02.docx 2-6 02/06/2012

developed area, of which 80 percent is residential and 20 percent is commercial and industrial (Smith,

2000). The TFM Site is outside of the developed area of Collinsville but is within its corporate limits.

This area is mostly rural with agricultural land use. There is some dispersed residential use (permanent

homes and trailers) in the area. Growth is occurring directly south of the TFM Site, in Owasso,

Oklahoma, which is approximately five miles south of the TFM Site. Several residential developments

and commercial shopping areas have been built in Owasso since the completion of the RI.

2.1.8 Ecology

The TFM Site is vegetated by various grass species, trees, and shrubs creating diverse habitat types.

There are areas of dense vegetation interspersed with sparsely vegetated areas and patches of bare or

rocky ground. Species of wildlife that likely occur on the TFM Site include bullsnake (Pituophis

melanoleucus), Woodhouse’s toad (Bufo woodhousei), box turtle (Terrapene sp.), common garter snake

(Thamnophis sirtalis), black ratsnake (Elaphe obsoleta), racer (Coluber constrictor), fox squirrel (Sciurus

niger), raccoon (Procyon lotor), opossum (Didelphis virginiana), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), red

fox (Vulpes fulva), coyote (Canis latrans), white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus), eastern cottontail

(Sylvilagus floridanus), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), killdeer (Charadrius vociferous),

mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), red-winged blackbird (Agelaius

phoeniceus), American robin (Turdus migratorius), barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), and scissor-tailed

flycatcher (Tryannus forficatus). These are common species that are typically found in areas that exhibit

varying amounts of disturbance.

According to the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory (ONHI) database (ONHI, 2003), the following

protected species are known or are likely to occur in Tulsa County:

Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status State Status

American Burying Beetle (ABB)

Nicrophorus americanus Endangered Endangered

Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened Endangered

Least Tern Sterna antillarum Endangered Endangered

Texas Horned Lizard Phrynosoma cornutum -- Candidate

Prior to the start of the RI, a survey was conducted for the ABB at the TFM Site. None were present on

the TFM Site (BMcD, 2007). An additional survey was performed in September 2011 in preparation for

RD field investigation activities. No ABBs were present during the 2011 survey either. A copy of the

2011 ABB survey is provided in Appendix B.


WP_02.docx 2-7 02/06/2012

Several additional protected terrestrial and aquatic species have the potential to be present within the

general area (OSDH, 1992); however, based on topography and surface features, only the federally

threatened western prairie fringed orchid (Platanthera praeclara) and the prairie mole cricket

(Gryllotalpa major), a species that is proposed for federal listing, could potentially be present at the TFM

Site.

Based on evidence of hunting (i.e., decoys present in the on-site ponds, tree stand, etc.), waterfowl are

present at least some time during the year. During a site visit conducted during USEPA’s Removal

Assessment, local fishermen reported that catfish and bass were present in the southern strip mine pit

(USEPA, 1999).

2.2 SITE HISTORY

2.2.1 Past and Current Site Activities

During World War I zinc was in great demand. It was used to galvanize armaments to prevent rust. A

zinc smelter and lead roaster were at the TFM Site from 1914 through 1925. Historically, the smelter was

known as the Prime Western Smelter. The TFM Site was also misnamed as the Acme Brick Strip Mines

site, since it was immediately adjacent to a strip mine on its southern boundary. Use of the land prior to

the smelting operation is unknown (OSDH, 1992).

The smelting operation utilized nine furnaces, approximately 150 feet in length by 60 feet wide, which

were believed to be fueled by nearby natural gas wells. Other main structures of the smelter included a

mechanical kiln building approximately 240 feet by 80 feet in size, a condenser room approximately 75

feet by 50 feet in size, and a laboratory (See Figure 2-2). A 2-million gallon capacity reservoir was used

in conjunction with the condenser room during smelting operations. In addition, large amounts of ore

were stored on the TFM Site in the area northeast of the waste piles (Figure 2-2). Little is known about

waste management at the smelter during its operation. Due to the time period in which the smelter

operated, it is unlikely that air emission control devices were used (ODEQ, 1994 and OSDH, 1992).

Strip mining occurred in the surrounding area. Immediately south of the TFM Site was a strip mining

operation approximately 40 acres in size, which was known as the Acme Brick Strip Mine (OSDH, 1992).

A water-filled surface impoundment (i.e., Strip Mine Pit), which acts as a southern boundary to the TFM

Site, is currently associated with the former strip mine. It has been reported that this impoundment serves

as a local fishery. Another strip mine area operated just east of the TFM Site, and one was located in

northeast Collinsville (Figure 2-1).


WP_02.docx 2-8 02/06/2012

The Collinsville Smelter, which is being evaluated through ODEQ’s Voluntary Cleanup Program, is

located approximately ¼ mile to the east-northeast of the TFM Site (Figure 2-1). The Bartelsville Zinc

Company owned and operated this zinc smelter between 1911 and 1918. The Bartelsville Zinc Company

owned 220 acres of land surrounding the Collinsville Smelter, and an area of approximately 40 acres has

been designated as the location where the primary smelter activities occurred. In 1987, the Collinsville

Smelter was reclaimed and regraded by the Oklahoma Conservation Commission (OCC) in conjunction

with reclamation of the adjacent coal strip mine (Exponent, 2001).

The majority of the structures have been demolished, but several foundations and building footings

remain on the TFM Site. On September 28, 1928, the 120-foot tall and 11-foot diameter smokestack was

imploded. A residence (Figure 2-2), which was occupied from 1935 through February 2002, was located

on the TFM Site near the former office building (paymaster hut). The on-site residence was destroyed by

a fire and is currently unoccupied. The residence has a water well that was used in the past for drinking

water but is no longer in use. No other residential structures are located on the site; however, a garage

and a few storage sheds remain in place adjacent to the former residence.

Although the TFM Site is fenced on all sides except for the Strip Mine Pit, there is evidence of

trespassing. There is abundant evidence of fishing and hunting activity around the ponds on the TFM

Site, and fishing in the ponds has been reported on several occasions. In addition, individuals have been

observed picking blackberries along the eastern fenced boundary and evidence of off-road vehicle traffic

is present. The area in the vicinity of the on-site residence, including the garage and storage sheds and

along the access road/driveway, has become a dumping area. Broken appliances, used exercise

equipment, tires, junked cars, and assorted trash/debris were observed during the October 27, 2011 site

visit.

2.2.2 Regulatory History

The TFM Site was identified during a formal study of zinc smelters in the state of Oklahoma. As

indicated in the CERCLIS database, discovery related to the site occurred in July 1992. In November

1992 under the direction of USEPA as part of a Multi-Site Cooperative Agreement (CA# V-00645-01),

the OSDH conducted a Preliminary Assessment (PA) of the TFM Site (then referred to as the Acme Brick

Strip Mines). The purpose of the PA was two-fold: 1) to assess the immediate or potential threat of

wastes at the TFM Site that may impact public health or the environment; and 2) to collect sufficient

information to support a decision regarding the need for further action under CERCLA/SARA (OSDH,

1992).


WP_02.docx 2-9 02/06/2012

In September 1994, the ODEQ conducted a focused Site Inspection (SI) under the direction of USEPA.

The objectives of the SI were to characterize and evaluate the potential risks associated with possible

hazardous substances. Information was collected such that one of the following decisions could be made

regarding the TFM Site: 1) conduct an expanded SI; 2) propose the site for the National Priority List

(NPL); 3) propose “No further remedial action planned” status; or 4) refer the site to the USEPA

emergency response branch for immediate action (ODEQ, 1994).

As indicated in the CERCLIS database, a search for potentially responsible parties (PRPs) was

undertaken from August through September 1998. The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Documentation

Record was completed by USEPA in September 1998, and the TFM Site was proposed to the Superfund

NPL on September 29, 1998. Final listing of the TFM Site to the NPL occurred on January 19, 1999.

In May of 1999, the USEPA Superfund Technical Assistance and Response Team (START) completed a

Removal Assessment Report for the TFM Site. The objectives of the Removal Assessment were to: 1)

conduct an on-site reconnaissance; 2) conduct a site records review at the Tulsa County courthouse; 3)

prepare a site location map; 4) collect and analyze soil, sediment water, air, and fish tissue samples; 5)

perform an aerial survey of the site; and 6) determine the extent of contamination and estimate waste

volumes (USEPA, 1999). On July 27, 1999 USEPA in conjunction with ODEQ and the Agency for

Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) held a public meeting to inform concerned citizens

about the TFM Site. A Fact Sheet describing the history, health issues, and planned action at the TFM

Site was available at the public meeting (DEQ, 2001). ATSDR finalized the Public Health Assessment

for Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing in July 2000 (ATSDR, 2000).

The Special Notice Letter was issued by USEPA on July 21, 2000, with a follow-up meeting conducted

August 29, 2000. A letter dated September 5, 2000 addressed the PRP request for copies of the Removal

Assessment Report and clarifications regarding USEPA’s Enforcement Position. Clarification was

provided to the PRP by USEPA’s letter dated October 24, 2000 along with the two requested copies of

the Removal Assessment Report (USEPA, 2004).

An ODEQ press release was published in the January 24, 2001 issue of the Collinsville News. The news

article outlined a brief history of the site, requested information from concerned citizens, and gave contact

information for the ODEQ Project Manager. Voluntary blood lead testing was conducted on children

from 6 months to 6 years of age on May 21 and 22, 2001 (ODEQ, 2001).

The PRP declined to conduct the RI/FS. In September 2001, the ODEQ assumed the role of conducting

the RI/FS, and the USEPA assumed the role of support agency when the cooperative agreement was


WP_02.docx 2-10 02/06/2012

funded (USEPA, 2004). A Unilateral Administrative Order for Access and Noninterference was signed

on May 1, 2003, and issued to two property owners of the TFM Site. A second Unilateral Administrative

Order for Access and Noninterference was signed on July 3, 2003, and issued to the same two property

owners to allow for the required compliance deadline. Access to the property was granted by the two

property owners in August 2003 (USEPA, 2004).

The USEPA and ODEQ negotiated a CA under which ODEQ was the lead agency for the RI/FS with

USEPA acting as the support agency. A RI/FS was undertaken at the TFM Site from 2005 through 2007

under the direction of the ODEQ as the lead agency. A ROD, describing the selected remedy for the

TFM Site based on the results of the RI/FS, was issued by the USEPA on November 24, 2008 (ODEQ,

2011). In the summer of 2010 USEPA partially funded ODEQ to lead the RD activities at the TFM Site

under the original CA (ODEQ, 2011).

2.3 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA TO BE USED IN RD

The primary source of physical and chemical data to be used in the RD was presented in the RI Report

(BMcD, 2007). Additional data collection activities are described in Section 3.4, and these activities are

designed to:

More narrowly define the vertical extent of waste materials and soils in excess of RAOs,

including evaluation of various hills and piles of debris in the former production area;

Define the vertical extent of sediment in excess of RAOs in the on-site Ponds, Mid-Site Ravine,

and Strip Mine Pit;

Determine the horizontal and vertical extent of smelter materials within the Strip Mine Pit;

Determine the volume of soil and sediment that requires stabilization based on toxicity

characteristic exceedances as outlined in 40 CFR 261.24;

Determine the extent of smelter materials on properties contiguous to the TFM Site;

Determine the need for surface water treatment prior to discharge of on-site surface water quality

relative to Oklahoma surface water quality criteria;

Conduct a hydrogeological investigation as needed to meet the requirements for construction of

an approximate 10 acre consolidation cell as outlined in OAC Title 252. Department of


WP_02.docx 2-11 02/06/2012

Environmental Quality, Chapter 515. Management of Solid Waste, Subchapter 7. Subsurface

Investigation (OAC 252:515-7).

Evaluate non-impacted TFM Site soils and transition soils that may exceed residential cleanup

levels but fall below nonresidential cleanup levels for potential inclusion within the cap; and,

Determine appropriate placement of the consolidation cell based on minimization of RA and

O&M costs as well as long-term effectiveness of the remedy to protect human health and the

environment.

A summary of RI findings for the TFM Site relevant to the RD is provided in the following sections, and

additional details are provided in the RI Report (BMcD, 2007).

2.3.1 Hydrology, Geology, and Hydrogeology

A description of TFM Site hydrology, geology, and hydrogeology were previously provided in Section

2.1 and Appendix A. Additional details regarding physical characteristics of the TFM Site that will be

pertinent to the RD are provided in the RI Report (BMcD, 2007).

2.3.2 On-Site Soil and Waste Materials

Laboratory analytical results from sampling completed during the RI field activities indicate that on-site

surface and subsurface soils have been impacted with metals. A comparison of RI soil results at various

depth intervals to the RAOs is presented on Figures 2-4 through 2-7:

0 to 0.5 feet bgs, Figure 2-4: A broad area of soil samples with results in excess of the

nonresidential RAOs was located south of the access road/driveway and comprised the majority

of the southern portion of the TFM Site. Limited areas of soil results below the nonresidential

RAOs but in excess of the residential RAOs were noted. Areas of soil results below the

residential RAOs were noted in the western portion and northern portion of the TFM Site.

0.5 to 2 feet bgs, Figure 2-5: A broad area of soil samples with results in excess of the

nonresidential RAOs was located surrounding TFM Ponds 1 and 2 and the southern portion of the

TFM Site. Only sporadic locations of soil results below the nonresidential RAOs but in excess of

the residential RAOs were noted. Areas of soil results below the residential RAOs were noted in

the western portion and northern portion of the TFM Site as well as surrounding the former

residence.


WP_02.docx 2-12 02/06/2012

2 to 4 feet bgs, Figure 2-6: The area of soil samples with results in excess of the nonresidential

RAOs was located surrounding TFM Ponds 1 and 2 and extended into the former

production/furnace area. The remaining soil results for the majority of the TFM Site were less

than the residential RAOs.

Greater than 4 feet bgs, Figure 2-7: Only the location surrounding RI trench location TR-09

exhibited soil results in excess of the nonresidential RAOs. The remaining soil results for

samples collected greater than 4 feet bgs were below the nonresidential RAOs.

Review of the TFM Site indicated a clear division into two areas: 1) areas of the TFM Site where waste

materials were not visually observed during sampling (i.e., on-site non-waste areas); and, 2) areas of the

Site where waste materials were visually observed during sampling (i.e., on-site waste areas). The extent

of on-site waste areas as well as the depth of waste materials visually observed during the RI is provided

on Figure 2-8. The depth of soil results in excess of nonresidential and residential RAOs corresponded to

the depth of visually observed waste materials.

Selected soil samples were collected for TCLP analysis during the RI to determine if the samples were

hazardous by characteristic. With one exception, exceedances of the TCLP criteria in 40 CFR 261.24

were only noted when waste materials were also present at the location and depth interval. Additional

soil sampling is planned during the RD investigation to determine if soils are present on the TFM Site that

would be considered hazardous by characteristic.

2.3.3 Surface Water and Sediment

Surface water and sediment were characterized during the RI for five on-site Ponds, one on-site drainage

(Mid-Site Ravine), and the Strip Mine Pit immediately adjacent to the waste area. The highest

concentration of metals was noted in surface water and sediment associated with TFM Ponds 1 through 3

and the Mid-Site Ravine. Waste materials were observed in and around these surface water bodies, and a

retort embankment was observed at Pond 3. In addition, smelter waste materials were observed to have

collapsed into the Strip Mine Pit.

It is anticipated that TFM Ponds 1 through 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit will be

abandoned/decommissioned during the RA. As such, it is anticipated that these water bodies will be

drained and the water discharged prior to the remedial action. A one time sampling event from each of

these features is planned during the RD investigation for purposes of characterizing the water for

management and/or discharge.


WP_02.docx 2-13 02/06/2012

A comparison of RI sediment results to the RAOs is presented on Figure 2-9. At least one sediment

sample from TFM Ponds 1 through 4 and the Mid-Site Ravine exceeded the RAOs. Since RI sediment

sampling was limited to 0 to 0.5 feet bgs, additional sampling is planned during the RD investigation to

delineate the vertical extent of sediment exceedances of RAOs. During the RI, Strip Mine Pit sediment

sampling was limited to discrete samples collected from the middle of the water body. Additional

sampling is planned during the RD investigation to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of smelter

waste materials that have slumped from the on-site waste area into this water body.

One sediment sample was collected for TCLP analysis during the RI to determine if the samples were

hazardous by characteristic. No exceedances of the TCLP criteria were noted. Additional sediment

sampling is planned during the RD investigation to determine if sediment is present on the TFM Site that

would be considered hazardous by characteristic.

2.3.4 Ground Water

Seven monitoring wells were installed during the RI, and these wells are shown on Figure 2-10. One

upgradient well (MW-01) was installed to serve as the background well for the TFM Site. Four

additional monitoring wells (MW-02 through MW-05) were installed downgradient in the on-site waste

area to evaluate potential contaminant impacts to ground water. A deep well (MW-04D) was installed

adjacent to Monitoring Well MW-04 to determine the presence of ground water within the bedrock based

upon elevated cadmium results within Monitoring Well MW-04. Lastly, Monitoring Well MW-06 was

installed east of the TFM Site and downgradient of Monitoring Well MW-04 to evaluate the potential

migration of dissolved metals offsite.

Limited impacts were noted to ground water beneath the TFM Site. Low-flow ground water sampling

conducted during RI Phase II indicated that elevated metals concentrations (i.e., cadmium) were only

noted at Monitoring Well MW-04. The vertical extent of cadmium was defined by a ground water sample

from MW-04D, which was screened in a deeper interval than MW-04 and was non-detect for cadmium.

The downgradient horizontal extent of cadmium was defined at off-site Well MW-06, which was non-

detect for metals.

To meet the requirements for construction of an approximate ten acre consolidation cell, a

hydrogeological investigation as outlined in the OAC 252-515-7, will be performed during the RD

investigation. To meet conditions of OAC 252:515-7-5 Ground water Study, four monitoring wells will

be installed in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell and ground water elevation

measurements will be collected monthly for one year. While these measurements are technically only


WP_02.docx 2-14 02/06/2012

required for the four wells installed in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell, elevation

measurements will be collected from all of the wells present at the TFM Site. In addition, a datalogger

will be installed in one well to provide continuous measurement.

While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that

smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore,

quarterly ground water sampling is recommended as part of the RD investigation to add to the RI data that

support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site.

Analytical sampling will include the four monitoring wells installed for piezometeric monitoring of the

proposed consolidation cell and the seven existing wells installed during the RI. In addition, ground

water events will be timed to coincide with ground water sampling that is on-going at the adjacent

Collinsville Smelter Site.

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan Task Narrative Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_03.docx 3-1 02/06/2012

3.0 TASK NARRATIVE

The tasks (1.0 through 14.0) included in the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) are discussed in detail in this section.

3.1 INTRODUCTION (SOW TASK 1.0)

The RD is generally defined as the activities to be undertaken to develop the final plans and

specifications, general provisions, and special requirements necessary to translate the ROD into the

remedy to be constructed under the RA phase. The RA is generally defined as the implementation phase

of site remediation or construction of the remedy, including necessary O&M, performance monitoring,

and special requirements. The RA is based on the RD to achieve the remediation goals specified in the

ROD.

Tasks described in Section 3.0 will be performed in accordance with the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) and will be

consistent with the ROD, the Remedial Design/Remedial Action Handbook (USEPA, 1995), and other

USEPA RD guidance.

3.2 PROJECT PLANNING AND SUPPORT (SOW TASK 2.0)

This section presents how the TFM Site specific remediation goals, as specified in the ROD, will be met.

3.2.1 Project Planning (SOW Task 2.1)

Prior to developing this RD Work Plan, BMcD and ODEQ project personnel participated in a scoping

meeting and site visit on October 27, 2011, to develop a conceptual understanding of the RD requirements

for the TFM Site. The site visit was documented in the Site Visit Report, dated November 7, 2011

(BMcD, 2011). Existing information was evaluated during the development of this RD Work Plan. This

RD Work Plan presents the general approach and rationale that will be used for the RD.

3.2.2 Site-Specific Plans (SOW Task 2.2)

Site-specific plans will be developed to provide procedures to be followed during RD implementation.

Site Management Plan (SMP)

A SMP will describe how access, security, contingency procedures, management responsibilities, and

waste disposal will be handled. The SMP will consist of a Pollution Control and Mitigation Plan and a

Transportation and Disposal Plan (Waste Management Plan).


WP_03.docx 3-2 02/06/2012

Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

The Remedial Design Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) will be prepared to address health and safety

requirements for TFM Site workers and visitors. The HASP addresses employee training, protective

equipment, medical surveillance requirements, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and contingency

plan in accordance 40 CFR 300.150 and 29 CFR 1910.120.

Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)

A SAP will describe chemical data acquisition. The SAP will consist of a QAPP, a FSP, and a DMP.

The QAPP will be prepared in accordance in USEPA QA/R-5 format. The QAPP will describe the

project objectives and organization, functional activities, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)

protocols that will be used to achieve the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs).

The FSP will describe sampling and data collection methods to be used for the RD. The FSP will include

sampling objectives, sample locations and frequency, sampling equipment and procedures, sample

handling and analysis, subcontractor responsibilities, and SOPs.

The DMP will describe the processes and systems used for handling data from collection through

analysis.

3.2.3 Project Management (SOW Task 2.3)

A description of the project management approach is discussed in Section 5.0 of this RD Work Plan.

3.2.4 Subcontractor Activities (SOW Task 2.4)

The following subcontractors will provide services for BMcD during implementation of the RD:

Analytical Laboratory Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality State Environmental Laboratory 707 N. Robinson Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Attn: April Hurst (405) 702-1038 [email protected]


WP_03.docx 3-3 02/06/2012

Industrial Hygiene Laboratory Environmental Hazards Services 7469 Whitepine Road Richmond, VA 23237-2261 Attn: Irma Faszewski (804) 275-4788 [email protected]

Geotechnical Laboratory Standard Testing and Engineering 10816 E. Newton Street, Suite 110 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74116 Attn: Terri Sullivan (918) 439-9593

Soil Fertility Laboratory Tulsa County Oklahoma State University Extension Office 4116 E. 15th St. Tulsa, Oklahoma 74112 (918) 746-3705

Direct-Push Contractor Environmental Priority Service, Inc. 7193 E. Benfield Rd. Salina, Kansas 67401 Attn: Patrick G. Martin (785) 823-6205

Excavation Contractor Environmental Remediation Specialists, Inc. 1105 N. Peoria Ave Tulsa, OK 74106 Attn: Ken Duckworth (918) 437-9999

Drilling Contractor Mohawk Drilling, Inc. 10010 East 16th Street Tulsa, OK 74128 Attn: Allan Brantley (918) 641-5790

Geophysical Testing Enviro-Log Operations LLC 1508 Vulcan Cir Edmond, Oklahoma 73003 Attn: Mike Mayfield (405) 834-1417


WP_03.docx 3-4 02/06/2012

Surveyor L.W. Survey Company 2156 West Albany Street Tulsa, OK 74012 Attn: Michael Ray (918) 251-1035

Bench Scale and Field Test Treatability Study Contractor Remediation Services, Inc. 2735 South 10th Street Independence, KS 67301 Attn: Grant Sherwood (620) 331-1200

3.3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (SOW TASK 3.0)

BMcD will provide community involvement support to ODEQ as necessary throughout the RD.

Community involvement support will be provided in accordance with Community Relations in Superfund:

A Handbook (USEPA, 1988). The CIP (ODEQ, 2011b) for the Site will be updated by ODEQ as

necessary.

As requested by ODEQ, BMcD will prepare fact sheets to inform the public about different stages of RD

activities. At least two separate fact sheets will be prepared. BMcD will also provide logistical and

technical support for public availability sessions and other community relations efforts, including the

TFM Site information repository and mailing lists.

3.4 DATA ACQUISITION (SOW TASK 4.0)

Data acquisition of environmental samples and information will be collected to support the RD. A

geological investigation will be conducted to provide additional data on surface soil, subsurface soil, and

sediment. A hydrogeologic investigation will be conducted to satisfy state solid waste regulations for the

consolidation cell. A surface water investigation will be conducted to provide information for

remediation of the surface water features on the TFM Site. A visual waste survey will be conducted on-

site and on properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site to identify areas of visible waste. An

ecological investigation will be conducted to provide an understanding of the current ecological

conditions and considerations for RD implementation. RI investigation derived waste (IDW) present on

site will also be addressed.


WP_03.docx 3-5 02/06/2012

3.4.1 Site Reconnaissance (SOW Task 4.2.1)

3.4.1.1 Topographic Survey

A topographic survey of the entire TFM Site will be conducted to develop the base map for the RD. The

survey will have one-foot contours and will be accurate to 0.05 feet on state plane coordinates. Ground

surface elevation will be established to within a minimum 0.01 vertical feet (above msl) relative to an

established United States Geological Survey (USGS) benchmark. The survey will capture tops and

bottoms of all slopes and all other breaklines. Property lines and utilities will also be included in the

survey. Surveying services will be provided by L.W. Survey Company of Tulsa, Oklahoma.

3.4.1.2 Visual Waste Survey

A visual waste survey will be conducted to determine the extent of waste material outside of the former

production area. Smaller areas of waste material exist onsite as driveway/road materials, in drainage

channels, and discontinuous “waste pockets”. Locations of waste materials identified outside of the

former production area will be mapped to document all visible waste materials for future incorporation

within the consolidation cell. Where waste is identified, soil samples will be collected to determine the

extent of impacted soil and need for stabilization of the soil prior to placing it in the consolidation cell.

Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead

and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead (Table 3-1).

Waste material has also been observed to extend offsite to adjacent properties as road/path materials. A

visual waste survey will be conducted on all properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site by

walking a 25-50 foot buffer around the perimeter of the TFM Site. Locations of waste materials

identified on off-site properties will be mapped to document all visible waste. Where waste is identified,

soil samples will be collected to determine the extent of impacted soil and need for stabilization of the soil

prior to placing it in the consolidation cell. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory

analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead (Table 3-1). If waste

materials are observed to extend beyond the properties adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site, the

ODEQ Project Manager will be notified. RD activities conducted on properties beyond those that are

adjacent and contiguous to the TFM Site will be at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager.

The TFM Site is bounded immediately to the east by the Atchison Topeka Santa Fe railroad tracks,

currently owned and operated WATCO. An access agreement is not in place for this property and will

not be pursued for RD activities. A visual waste survey of this property will be conducted, as applicable,

from adjacent properties where access agreements are in place.


WP_03.docx 3-6 02/06/2012

3.4.2 Geological Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.2)

A geological investigation will be conducted to verify volumes, determine the need for stabilization, and

identify a potential onsite borrow source that could be used for cap material. Surface soil and subsurface

soil samples will be collected from on-site locations to verify volumes and evaluate potential borrow

material. Sediment samples will be collected from on-site locations to verify volumes of sediment above

the RAOs and determine the need for stabilization.

3.4.2.1 Surface/Subsurface Soil Sampling

Surface and subsurface soil samples will be collected to further define on-site materials and determine the

need for stabilization. Surface and subsurface soil samples will be collected as indicated on Table 3-1.

Sample locations are presented on Figure 3-1, and additional locations will be identified following the

visual waste survey. Additional sample locations may be added based on conditions observed during

sampling, at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager. Further details on the proposed sampling

activities and a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.

Direct-Push Sampling

Direct-push sampling techniques will be used to collect soils in areas where slag-like materials are not

expected to provide subsurface obstruction. Direct-push services will be provided by Environmental

Priority Service, Inc. of Salina, Kansas. Sample locations will focus on RI sample locations where

vertical extent has not been fully defined, areas not heavily sampled during the RI, and observations made

during the visual waste survey (see Section 3.4.1.2). Sample locations may be adjusted based on

conditions encountered in the field.

Soil samples will also be collected at RI location SP-55 to define vertical extent of contamination. Three

sample locations will be near the on-site Ponds: one sample location will be located north of TFM Pond 3,

one sample location will be located southwest of TFM Pond 4, and one sample location will be west of

TFM Pond 4 near the low-lying area draining into TFM Pond 4. Additional soil sample locations will be

selected based on observations made during the visual waste survey.

Surface and subsurface samples will be collected at approximately 20 sample locations. Samples will be

collected from the surface (0-0.5 feet bgs), shallow subsurface (0.5-2 feet bgs), and deeper subsurface (2-

4 feet bgs). Samples will be submitted to the SEL in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for off-site laboratory

analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.


WP_03.docx 3-7 02/06/2012

Test Pits and Borings – Borrow Materials

Test pits and borings will be used to collect soils in on-site areas that have the potential to be used as a

borrow source for cap materials. Test pits will be used to collect disturbed geotechnical samples and

chemical samples. Borings will be used to collect undisturbed geotechnical samples. Test pit services

will be performed by Environmental Remediation Specialists, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Boring services

will be performed by Mohawk Drilling, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Sample locations will focus on areas

identified in the RI with metals concentrations below the RAOs. Samples will be submitted to the SEL

for off-site laboratory analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead. Samples will also be submitted to a

geotechnical laboratory (Standard Testing and Engineering Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma) for off-site

analysis of Atterburg limits, hydraulic conductivity, sieve with hydrometer, soil bulk density, specific

water/moisture content, standard proctor, and modified proctor. Soil samples will also be collected for

analysis by the Tulsa County Oklahoma State University Extension office to determine fertility needs for

maximum growing effectiveness. Following evaluation of sample results from the potential borrow

sources, chemical analysis for additional analytes will be required prior to designating any area as a

borrow source (see Table 3-1).

Test Pits – Waste Characterization

A waste investigation will be conducted to define the extent of waste materials. Test pits will be used to

define horizontal and vertical extent of waste within the waste material area (see Figure 2-3), at the

perimeter of the waste material area, and in isolated waste material areas. A description of the waste and

thickness of the waste will be documented at each test pit (see Table 3-1).

In the waste material area, soil samples will be collected from the native clay under the waste to assess

any apparent leaching of materials from the waste into the subsurface and determine the need for

stabilization of the native clay. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of

TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.

If fine waste materials that have the appearance of soil are present at the perimeter of the waste material

area and at the isolated waste material areas, samples of these materials will be collected for

characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurrence of waste

material to assess the need for stabilization of the soil at the perimeter of the waste material area and the

isolated waste material areas. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis of

total arsenic, cadmium, and lead and TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead.


WP_03.docx 3-8 02/06/2012

3.4.2.2 Sediment Sampling

Sediment samples will be collected to determine vertical extent of sediment contamination and need for

stabilization. Sediment samples will be collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM

Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit. Sediment samples will be collected as indicated on

Table 3-1. Sample locations are presented on Figure 3-2. Details on the proposed sampling activities and

a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.

Samples collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, and the Mid-Site Ravine

will be collected from two depths (0.5-1 feet bgs and 1-2 feet bgs) at each location for analysis of total

arsenic, cadmium, and lead to determine vertical extent of contamination. Samples will also be collected

from one depth (0-0.5 feet bgs) at each location for analysis of TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead to

assess the need for stabilization prior to placing the sediment in the consolidation cell. Samples will be

submitted to SEL for off-site laboratory analysis.

The extent of smelter materials slumping into the Strip Mine Pit is unknown. Sediment cores will be

collected from the Strip Mine Pit along transect lines at various distances from the shore (transect lines

are illustrated on Figure 3-2). The cores will be visually inspected for the presence of waste materials.

Sample locations and depths will be determined based on visual inspection of the cores. Samples will be

collected from up to three depths at eight locations for analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, and lead to

determine vertical extent of contamination. One sample will also be collected at each location for

analysis of TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead to assess the need for stabilization prior to placing the

sediment in the consolidation cell.

3.4.3 Hydrogeological Investigation – Ground Water (SOW Task 4.2.3)

A hydrogeological investigation will be conducted to meet the requirements of OAC 252:515. The

hydrogeologic investigation is designed to meet permit requirements for the consolidation cell. Details of

the ground water hydrogeological investigation were developed to meet the requirements of OAC

252:515 Subchapter 7, Subsurface Investigation. Specific details of the Drilling Plan (per OAC 252:515-

7-4) are presented in the FSP. Boring, monitoring well, and ground water activities will be conducted as

indicated on Table 3-2. Boring and monitoring well locations are presented on Figure 3-3.

Based on the assumption of an approximate ten acre consolidation cell, the following activities are

planned. Six borings will be installed to 30 feet below the lowest elevation of the bottom of the waste

materials in the consolidation area. One boring will be advanced to a minimum of 100 feet bgs. Borings

will be advanced to bedrock (approximately ten feet bgs) using “dry methods” and will be advanced to


WP_03.docx 3-9 02/06/2012

total depth using coring methods. Drilling services will be provided by Mohawk Drilling, Inc. of Tulsa,

Oklahoma. A lithologic log will be prepared for each boring. One geotechnical soil sample will be

collected from each type of soil encountered. Previous investigations indicate there are up to four types

of unconsolidated materials present at the TFM Site: a silty loam/silty sand; a clay; a lower silty

loam/silty sand; and the waste material. The geotechnical soil samples will be submitted for analysis of

Atterburg limits, hydraulic conductivity, sieve with hydrometer, and specific water/moisture content.

Geophysical logging using gamma ray/neutron logs will be performed at three of the borings.

Geophysical testing services will be performed by Enviro-Log Operations, LLC of Edmond, Oklahoma.

Upon completion, the borings will be abandoned.

Four monitoring wells will be installed to monitor ground water elevation in the proposed consolidation

cell area. Based upon previous investigations, ground water is present in an unconfined condition in a

thin zone located directly above bedrock. A lithologic log will be prepared for each boring. Borings will

be continuously sampled to the top of bedrock. The monitoring wells will be constructed with five feet of

screen that straddles the top of ground water.

RI data indicates that waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water.

Three ground water sampling events conducted during the RI indicated that contamination is not present

in ground water and migrating off-site; this determination was made using six on-site wells and one

downgradient off-site well. If supplemental data points are desired to support this determination,

additional off-site monitoring wells may be installed to the east of the TFM Site following completion of

construction activities at the adjacent Collinsville Smelter Site. Installation of additional off-site

monitoring wells, while not planned at this time, will be at the discretion of the ODEQ Project Manager.

Ground water elevation measurements will be collected monthly in accordance with OAC 252:515

Subchapter 7, Part 5, Ground water Study. Although ground water elevation measurements are only

required for the four piezometers in close proximity to the proposed consolidation cell, ground water

elevation measurements will be collected from all of the TFM Site monitoring wells, including seven

existing monitoring wells and four proposed monitoring wells. A datalogger will be installed in one of

the wells to provide continuous ground water elevation data.

Analytical sampling is not required during the design phase; however, it is known that waste materials are

present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Quarterly ground water sampling of seven

existing and four proposed monitoring wells will be conducted to add to the RI data that support the

determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site.


WP_03.docx 3-10 02/06/2012

3.4.4 Hydrogeological Investigation – Surface Water (SOW Task 4.2.4)

Surface water samples will be collected for characterization for discharge purposes from TFM Pond 1,

TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit. Surface water

elevation measurements will also be collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond

4, and the Strip Mine Pit. Surface water samples will be collected as indicated on Table 3-2. Details on

the proposed sampling activities and a discussion of sampling methods will be described in the FSP.

It is anticipated that the surface water features onsite (TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM

Pond 4, the Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit) will need to be drained during the RA. Surface

water samples will be collected for characterization of discharge purposes (i.e., National Pollutant

Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] parameters). Surface water samples will be collected in

conjunction with the first quarterly ground water monitoring event. If the ponds are drying during this

event, sample collection will be delayed to a later quarterly ground water monitoring event when the

ponds have water. Samples collected from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, the

Mid-Site Ravine, and the Strip Mine Pit will be collected for analysis of total arsenic, cadmium, lead,

manganese, and zinc. Samples will also be collected for analysis of water quality parameters required for

NPDES discharge, including: hardness, alkalinity, chloride, sulfate, total suspended solids, nitrate/nitrite

as N, ammonia as N, chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon, biochemical oxygen demand, and oil

and grease. Specific conductance, pH, turbidity, and dissolved oxygen will also be measured during field

sampling. Samples will be submitted to the SEL for off-site laboratory analysis.

Surface water elevation measurements will be collected monthly from TFM Pond 1, TFM Pond 2, TFM

Pond 3, TFM Pond 4, and the Strip Mine Pit.

3.4.5 Waste Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.5)

IDW generated during the RD will be disposed of on-site at the point of generation in accordance with the

Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived Waste, 9345.03FS (USEPA, 1992). Therefore, additional

sampling and analysis of RD IDW will not be performed. IDW generated during the RI will be assessed

and recontainerized as needed (Section 3.4.7).

Waste tires present on the TFM Site will be relocated to the site gate as part of this task.

3.4.6 Ecological Investigation (SOW Task 4.2.6)

A site reconnaissance will be conducted by BMcD biologists familiar with the regional flora and fauna.

Prior to the start of the RD, a survey was conducted at the TFM Site for the ABB by Eagle Environmental


WP_03.docx 3-11 02/06/2012

Consulting, Inc. of Vinita, Oklahoma. No ABBs were present on the TFM Site. The Survey is valid until

May 20, 2012. If intrusive field activities are conducted after May 20, 2012, a new ABB survey will be

required. A copy of the ABB survey is provided in Appendix B.

3.4.7 Investigation Derived Waste (SOW Task 4.2.7)

IDW generated during the RD will be disposed of on-site in accordance with the Guide to Management of

Investigation-Derived Waste, 9345.03FS (USEPA, 1992). Eleven drums of IDW soil remain on-site from

RI activities. The physical condition of these drums will be assessed and the contents will be

recontainerized as needed. IDW handling procedures will be discussed in the FSP.

3.5 SAMPLING ANALYSIS (SOW TASK 5.0)

Soil, sediment, ground water, and surface water samples that will be collected for off-site analysis as part

of the RD field effort are summarized in Tables 3-1 and 3-2. The primary analytical laboratory for the

RD is the SEL, which will analyze soil and water samples for metals, TCLP metals, and general water

chemistry parameters. In the event of unforeseen circumstances at the SEL, analysis will be provided by

a laboratory subcontracted by BMcD. Any laboratories subcontracted by BMcD are expected to meet the

certification requirements for ODEQ and/or the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NELAP).

Samples will be analyzed for the chemicals of concern identified in the ROD (arsenic, cadmium, and

lead). Samples will be analyzed according to the methods indicated in the QAPP. Sample preparations,

shipment, and QC sample collection will be outlined in the FSP.

An industrial hygiene lab, Environmental Hazards Services, will be contracted at the start of intrusive

field activities to analyze personal air monitoring cassettes for cadmium and lead to determine the

appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE) when conducting the field investigation.

3.6 ANALYTICAL SUPPORT AND DATA VALIDATION (SOW TASK 6.0)

Project personnel will follow procedures outlined in the FSP regarding sample collection, custody,

numbering and labeling, packing and shipping, and documentation.

Results of analytical samples will be validated by BMcD personnel to verify the usability of analytical

data for purposes of supporting the development of the RD. Data validation will follow the procedures

outlined in the QAPP. The results of the data validation will be included in the Data Evaluation Report.


WP_03.docx 3-12 02/06/2012

3.7 DATA EVALUATION (SOW TASK 7.0)

The physical and chemical data generated during the RD will be evaluated, interpreted, and summarized

as the project progresses. Data evaluation will include summarizing the following:

Geologic data, including soil (surface and subsurface) and sediment chemical analytical results

and soil and sediment volumes;

Hydrogeologic data, including ground water chemical analytical results and ground water

elevation measurements;

Hydrogeologic data, including surface water chemical analytical results;

Waste data, including observations of waste materials in test pits and during the visual waste

survey and waste volumes; and

Ecological data, including observations made during the site reconnaissance and results of the

ABB survey.

A Data Evaluation Report will be prepared to present information to be used in the later steps of the RD.

Given the long-duration of ground water monitoring, it is likely that two Data Evaluation Reports will be

prepared: one to discuss the results of the soil, sediment, waste, and geological data and a second report

to present the findings of the ground water monitoring. Data from the RI and RD investigation will be

combined and presented to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the TFM Site.

Specifically, the following types of data gathered during the RI and RD investigation will be evaluated:

Surface Soil Data:

Results of chemical analyses of surface soil samples will be used to characterize soils, verify

volumes, and determine the need for stabilization prior to placing surface soils into the

consolidation cell.

Subsurface Soil Data:

Results of chemical analyses of subsurface soil samples will be used to characterize soils, verify

volumes, and determine the need for stabilization prior to placing subsurface soils into the

consolidation cell. Results of geotechnical analyses of subsurface soil samples will be used to

evaluate potential on-site borrow areas for consolidation cell cap materials. Geologic logs

obtained during subsurface investigations will be evaluated to provide additional information on

subsurface conditions existing at the TFM Site.

Sediment Data:

Results of chemical analyses of sediment samples and depth measurements of sediment will be


WP_03.docx 3-13 02/06/2012

used to characterize sediments, verify volumes, and determine the need for stabilization prior to

placing sediment into the consolidation cell.

Hydrogeologic Data – Ground Water:

Results of chemical analyses of ground water samples will be used to add to the RI data

that support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating

off-site. Soil and ground water data obtained during the hydrogeologic investigation, including

results of geotechnical analysis and ground water elevation measurements, will be used to satisfy

Oklahoma solid waste management permit requirements for placement of the consolidation cell.

Hydrogeologic Data – Surface Water:

Results of chemical analyses of the surface water samples will be used for characterization for

discharge purposes.

Waste Data:

Observations made during the advancement of test pits and during the visual waste survey will be

used to verify volumes of waste materials to be placed in the consolidation cell.

3.8 TREATABILITY STUDY AND PILOT TESTING (SOW TASK 8.0)

A treatability study will be conducted to provide sizing and operations criteria to be used in the RD. A

Treatability and Pilot Study Work Plan will be prepared to include technology description, equipment,

procedures, design criteria, operating conditions, data analysis and management, health and safety

procedures, and waste management. A schedule will also be included in the Treatability and Pilot Study

Work Plan.

A Treatability Study Report will be prepared to summarize the results of the stabilization techniques and

recommend the stabilization technique for the final design.

A brief preliminary synopsis of the Bench Test and Field Test is included below.

Bench Test

Soil and sediment samples will be composited from areas where the soil and sediment are known to be

characteristically hazardous for arsenic, cadmium, or lead (see RI Report Tables 4-10 and 4-12 and results

of RD soil investigation activities). These samples will be collected in the same area that the soil to be

used in the full scale treatability study will be obtained. The samples will be submitted to Trinity

Analytical Laboratory, Mound Valley, Kansas, where a bench scale treatability study will be performed.

The composite sample of soil and sediments will be homogenized in separate containers. A sample from


WP_03.docx 3-14 02/06/2012

both the soil and the sediment will be analyzed for TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead. If the analytical

results do not exceed the Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity Characteristic for at

least one metal, an additional sample of that matrix will be collected and submitted to the laboratory for

the bench scale treatability study. It is assumed that lead is the primary contaminant of concern and

arsenic and cadmium are secondary. If lead exceeds the TCLP limit and arsenic or cadmium do not

exceed the regulatory limit, the bench scale study will proceed.

The bench scale treatability study will consist of mixing three different commercially available soil

stabilization reagents (Enviroblend®, Triple Super Phosphate®, and Redox®)1 at three different ratios of

soil (wet weight) and the stabilization reagent. Based on the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and

lead, and discussions with the reagent suppliers, the following types of reagent and percentages by weight

for the treatability study are initially proposed:

Enviroblend 90/10® 1%, 2%, and 3% by wet weight of soil

Triple Super Phosphate® 1%, 2%, and 3% by wet weight of soil

Redox® 2%, 3%, and 4% by wet weight of soil

Each of the samples will be analyzed for TCLP arsenic, cadmium, and lead. The laboratory will also

provide a unit weight of the raw soil and the raw sediment for use in the field treatability study.

Field Test

The full scale field treatability study will be performed on both soil and sediment. The two lowest ratios

of reagent to soil for each reagent will be used. Any mixture used in the bench scale treatability study

that does not meet the treatment criteria (exhibiting a concentration of the TCLP extract less than the

regulatory level) will be excluded from the field treatability study.

The soil used in the field treatability study will be obtained in the same locations as the soil used in the

bench scale treatability study. Sediments that are saturated will be stockpiled adjacent to the excavation

area to allow the free liquids to drain. The soil will be excavated and placed in a mixing container (sealed

rolloff container). The soil or sediment will be placed to a known depth in the mixing container that will

provide approximately 10 cubic yards of soil or sediment. The laboratory provided unit weight will be

used to calculate the weight of the soil and sediment. The appropriate amount of reagent will be added

and the soil/sediment and reagent will be mixed. Once a batch has been completed it will be transferred

1 The stabilization reagents listed here are examples. The actual reagents used will be identified in the Treatability and Pilot Study Work Plan.


WP_03.docx 3-15 02/06/2012

to a stockpile area lined with visqueen. A sample will be collected and submitted for laboratory analysis;

split samples will be submitted to the SEL. Each stockpile will be covered once the sample has been

collected. In the unlikely event that a batch is determined to be hazardous, additional reagent will be

added, and the batch will be remixed and resampled.

Following stabilization, IDW from the field test will remain on-site until it is placed in the consolidation

cell. The pilot study field test will be performed by Remediation Services, Inc. of Independence, Kansas.

3.9 PRELIMINARY REMEDIAL DESIGN (SOW TASK 9.0)

The Preliminary RD will begin at the conclusion of the treatability and pilot studies. This phase includes

the initial design and ends with the completion of approximately 30% of the design effort. At the

conclusion of the Preliminary Design stage, BMcD will have field verified the existing conditions, as

necessary. Supporting data and documentation will be provided with the design documents which define

the functional aspects of the project to prove that the completed project will be effective in meeting the

remediation goals and Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs). An evaluation of

the transition soil located at the TFM Site will be included to determine amendments and vegetation types

that can achieve the performance standards and evaluate cost effectiveness. All design milestone

deliverables will be submitted in accordance with the schedule established in the Preliminary Design

submittal.

3.9.1 Design Criteria Report (SOW Task 9.1)

As part of the Preliminary RD, BMcD will prepare a Design Criteria Report. The purpose of this report is

to detail the technical parameters upon which the design will be based. Specifically, the Design Criteria

Report will include preliminary design assumptions and parameters, including:

Waste characterization;

Pretreating requirements;

Volume and types of each medium requiring treatment;

Treatment schemes, rates, and required qualities of waste streams;

Performance standards;

Long-term performance monitoring and O&M requirements;

Compliance with all ARARs, pertinent codes, and standards;

Technical factors of importance to the design and construction including use of currently

accepted environmental control measures, constructability of the design, and use of currently

acceptable construction practices and techniques; and


WP_03.docx 3-16 02/06/2012

Evaluation of various types of caps.

All design efforts will assume that landfill disposal will consist of an in situ (i.e., existing, native soil)

bottom liner and an engineered soil cover that will be demonstrated to show reduced infiltration and

associated reduced ground water impact. One site visit is anticipated for members of the design team as

part of the Preliminary Design.

3.9.2 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 9.1.5)

BMcD will prepare and submit a detailed description of the evaluations conducted to select the design

approach as part of the Basis of Design Report. This report will include a summary and detailed

justification of assumptions. This summary shall include calculations supporting the assumptions, a draft

process flow diagram, a detailed evaluation of how all ARARs will be met, a plan for minimizing

environmental and public impacts, and a plan for satisfying permitting requirements. The need for land

acquisition for access and easement requirements (if necessary) will be identified as part of this report;

BMcD will identify the need for, and locations of field investigation activities and visual waste surveys.

3.9.3 Preliminary Plans and Specifications (SOW Task 9.1)

Contents of the Preliminary Plans and Specifications are outlined in the following sections.

3.9.3.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Construction Schedule (SOW Task 9.1.1 and 9.1.2)

The proposed schedule will be provided in the Preliminary Design submittal. The schedule will utilize a

phased approach to expedite the RA. The schedule will also be appropriate to the size and complexity of

the project, and will include plans and specifications.

3.9.3.2 Design Specifications Outline (SOW Task 9.1.3)

An outline of all applicable specifications will be provided in the Preliminary Design submittal.

Specifications shall conform to the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) format.

3.9.3.3 Preliminary Drawings (SOW Task 9.1.4)

The Preliminary Design drawings will include a listing of proposed drawings and schematics, facility

representations including a revised process flow diagram and a preliminary piping and instrumentation

diagram (P&ID), a general arrangement diagram, and site drawings.

3.9.3.4 Cost Estimate (SOW Task 9.1.6)

The estimated cost of the remedy, as provided in the ROD (USEPA, 2008), is:


WP_03.docx 3-17 02/06/2012

Soil and Waste Materials: On-Site Locations, Consolidation and cap, of approximately 164,000

yd3 of material

o Estimated Capital Cost - $5,787,934

Sediment and Surface Water: On-Site Ponds, Mid-Site Ravine, and Strip Mine Pit, On-Site

Fixation or Stabilization and On-Site Disposal, of approximately 33,000 yd3 of material

o Estimated Capital Cost - (Cost for Sediment and Surface Water included in the Soil and

Waste Materials cost.)

Soil, Sediment, and Waste Materials: Off-Site Locations, Excavation, Stabilization, and

Disposal at TFM On-Site, of approximately 1,600 yd3 of material

o Estimated Total Capital Cost - $331,213.

The estimated consolidated cost including O&M for the Selected Remedy is $6,605,479 (USEPA, 2008).

Changes in the cost elements are likely to occur as a result of new information and data collected during

additional TFM Site activities. The preliminary cost estimate is an order-of-magnitude engineering cost

estimate that is expected to be within plus 50% to minus 30% of the actual project cost. A revised cost

estimate will be provided as part of the Preliminary Design submittal, and this estimate will be prepared

using Microcomputer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES) Gold cost estimating system for RA in

accordance with the SOW (ODEQ, 2011).

These cost estimates are based on the assumption that the soil, sediment, and waste material may be

hazardous. There are costs and assumptions related to discount rates, O&M, five-year reviews, or ICs

because contamination will be left on the site.

Value Engineering Screening (SOW Task 9.4)

The VE screening will include an evaluation of cost and function relationships and will concentrate on

high cost areas. The focus of the VE does not preclude the VE team from identifying technical errors or

omissions and altering the design so these problems can be taken into consideration during the design

reviews. The VE team will be a multi-disciplinary team with VE training and experience and technical

knowledge to conduct the review. The VE screening shall be performed by an independent VE group that

is not otherwise participating in the RD. The outcome of the screening will be a recommendation for or

against a full-scale VE study based on the potential for cost savings as a result of design changes. Results

of the VE Screening will be presented as part of the RA Cost Estimate.

3.9.3.5 Variances with Record of Decision (SOW Task 9.2)

No variances with the ROD are anticipated; however, if it is determined that the RA being designed


WP_03.docx 3-18 02/06/2012

differs from the ROD or that an ARAR cannot be met, BMcD will describe the issue and recommend

technical solutions in a memorandum to the ODEQ Project Manager.

3.9.4 Comment Response, Design Review and Briefing (SOW Tasks 9.5 and 9.6)

BMcD will participate in design review meetings at ODEQ’s Oklahoma City office. BMcD will

consolidate and respond to design review comments; a written response will be provided for each

comment. The response will indicate whether the design change will be implemented, and how the

change will impact the selected remedy, costs, and schedule. A summary of the responses to comments

will be submitted to the ODEQ Project Manager prior to initiation of the Intermediate Design Phase. QC

procedures will be implemented to ensure the quality of all reports and submittals. QC procedures will

include internal technical and editorial reviews, independent verification of all calculations used in the

design, and documentation of all reviews, the problems identified, and corrective actions taken.

3.10 EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, AND UTILITIES (SOW TASK 10.0)

It is not anticipated that any long-lead equipment and/or services will be required as part of this RA.

Should any of this type of equipment and/or services be required, BMcD will complete all tasks necessary

to procure long-lead equipment and services. A list of any elements or components for the facility that

will require custom fabrication or long-lead time for procurement will be completed. BMcD will prepare

necessary plans and specifications, advertise for, and evaluate bids for equipment and services, as needed.

3.11 INTERMEDIATE REMEDIAL DESIGN (SOW TASK 11.0)

The Intermediate RD begins at the completion of the Preliminary Design phase and ends with the

completion of approximately 60% of the total design effort. BMcD will submit to ODEQ the

Intermediate Design submittal which will consist of a continuation and expansion of the Preliminary

Design submittal. Review comments, as described in Section 3.9.4, will be reflected in the Intermediate

Design. A VE Study shall be performed, if determined to be appropriate, based on approved

recommendations from the VE screening (Section 3.9.3.4). All Intermediate RD documents will be

submitted in accordance with the approved design management schedule provided in the Preliminary

Design submittal.

3.11.1 Intermediate Plans and Specifications (SOW Task 11.0)

Contents of the Intermediate Plans and Specifications are outlined in the following sections.


WP_03.docx 3-19 02/06/2012

3.11.1.1 Update Construction Schedule (SOW Task 11.1)

The schedule for implementation of the RA shall identify the timing for initiation and completion of all

critical path tasks. The schedule shall specifically identify duration for completion of the project and

major milestones. This schedule will be a revision from the schedule presented in the Preliminary Design

submittal. Actual dates will be applied to the schedule when they become available.

3.11.1.2 Design Specifications (SOW Task 11.2)

Plans and specifications will conform to acceptable standards and shall be formatted in accordance with

CSI requirements. Plans and specifications shall include preliminary specifications for construction,

installation, site preparation, and field work standards, including equipment startup and operator training

plans. A table of contents for general specifications will be provided as part of the Intermediate RD

submittal.

3.11.1.3 Drawings (SOW Task 11.3)

BMcD will submit an outline or listing of drawings, including:

Facility representations containing process flow diagrams, a P&ID, and a control logic table; and

Continuation and expansion drawings for those submitted with the Preliminary Plans and

Specifications.

3.11.1.4 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 11.4)

BMcD will submit a revised Basis of Design Report, as a result of the review conducted as part of the

Preliminary Design (see Section 3.9.8). This report will include:

Summary and Detailed Justification of Assumptions, including design calculation assumptions;

A revised process flow diagram;

A detailed evaluation of how ARARs will be met;

A plan for minimization of environmental and public impacts;

Heat and mass balances;

Recommended RA contracting strategy;

Plan for satisfying permitting requirements; and

Identification of easement and access requirements.

3.11.1.5 Revised Cost Estimate (SOW Task 11.5)

The revised estimate of the RA will be developed using flow sheets, layouts, and equipment details. This


WP_03.docx 3-20 02/06/2012

cost estimate will be prepared using MCACES Gold cost estimating system for RA and be accurate

within plus 40% to minus 20%.

3.11.1.6 Variances with Record of Decision (SOW Task 11.8)

No variances with the ROD are anticipated; however, if it is determined that the RA being design differs

from the ROD or that an ARAR cannot be met, BMcD will describe the issue and recommend technical

solutions in a memorandum to the ODEQ Project Manager.

3.11.2 VE Study (If Needed) (SOW Task 11.7)

If determined to be appropriate, a VE Study will be conducted and the report prepared by an independent

VE group that is not otherwise participating in the RD.

3.11.3 Comment Response, Design Review and Briefing (SOW Tasks 11.6

and 11.9)

BMcD will participate in a variety of design review activities, including design review meetings to be

held at ODEQ’s Oklahoma City office. BMcD will also perform and submit a report describing the

results of the following design reviews:

Initial Constructability Review;

Initial Bidability Review;

Initial Operability Review;

Initial Environmental Review; and

Initial Claims Prevention Screening.

BMcD will consolidate and respond to design review comments; a written response will be provided for

each comment. The response will indicate whether the design change will be implemented, and how the

change will impact the selected remedy, costs, and schedule. A summary of the responses to comments

will be submitted to the ODEQ Project Manager prior to initiation of Prefinal and Final Design. The

design changes shall be incorporated under Intermediate Design.

3.12 PREFINAL AND FINAL DESIGN (SOW TASK 12.0)

BMcD will submit the Prefinal Design according to the design management schedule provided in the

Preliminary Design submittal. The Prefinal Design will function as the draft version of the Final Design.

The Prefinal Design shall address comments generated from the Intermediate Design Review and clearly

show any modifications of the design as a result of incorporation of the comments. After ODEQ review


WP_03.docx 3-21 02/06/2012

and comment on the Prefinal Design, the Final design shall be submitted. All Final Design documents

will be approved by a Professional Engineer registered in Oklahoma. ODEQ approval of the Final

Design is required before initiating the RA, unless authorized by ODEQ.

3.12.1 Prefinal Designs and Specifications (SOW Task 12.1)

Contents of the Prefinal Plans and Specifications are outlined in the following sections.

3.12.1.1 Design Specifications (SOW Task 12.1)

A complete set of construction drawings and specifications will be submitted at the prefinal stage. All

specifications shall conform to CSI format. VE report recommendations (if any), will be incorporated

into the prefinal design drawings and specifications. The final design plans and specifications will be

consistent with the technical requirements of all ARARs. Any off-site disposal shall be in compliance

with the policies stated in the Procedure for Planning and Implementing Off-Site Response Actions

(Federal Register 40 CFR Part 300.400) and other applicable guidance. General correlation between

drawings and technical specifications will be met. Prior to submitting the project specifications, BMcD

will coordinate and cross-check the specifications and drawings, and ensure that all edits have been

incorporated on all drawings and specifications.

3.12.1.2 Drawings (SOW Task 12.2)

The final submittals will include a complete set of construction drawings and specifications as well as a

set of one-half size reductions of drawings. All specifications shall conform to CSI format.

3.12.1.3 Basis of Design Report (SOW Task 12.3)

Any changes from the Intermediate Design submittal will be incorporated at this phase of the project.

3.12.1.4 Revised Cost Estimate (SOW Task 12.4)

BMcD will prepare a definitive cost estimate of the offers to be received for RA for each work item from

definitive engineering data, within an accuracy of plus 15% to minus 5%. The definitive cost estimate

will be accompanied by a range estimate and analysis of the project’s potential scope, cost, and schedule

change during RA. One copy of the quantity takeoff sheets, including the appropriate items, will be

included. All work items will be broken down into labor, materials, and equipment. A basis for

development of all unit prices in the estimate will be provided. The final estimate will be based on the

advertised plans and specifications including amendments. It will reflect current prices for labor,

materials, and equipment. The estimate will identify contingencies within the defined project scope. The

cost estimate will be prepared using MCACES Gold cost estimating system.


WP_03.docx 3-22 02/06/2012

3.12.1.5 Bidability, Operability, and Constructability Reviews (SOW Task 12.8)

BMcD will conduct final constructability, bidability, operability, environmental, and claims prevention

reviews and document results.

3.12.1.6 Revised Delivery Strategy and Schedule (SOW Task 12.9)

The schedule for implementation of the RA shall identify the timing for initiation and completion of all

critical path tasks. The schedule shall specifically identify duration for completion of the project and

major milestones. This schedule will be a revision from the schedule presented in the Intermediate

Design submittal. Actual dates will be applied to the schedule when they become available.

3.12.1.7 Document VE Modifications (SOW Task 12.10)

BMcD will document any project revisions required as a result of the VE Study, if necessary.

3.12.1.8 Draft O&M Manual (SOW Task 12.11)

The Draft O&M Manual will include:

An O&M plan that includes a description of normal O&M, including startup procedures, tasks for

operation, tasks for maintenance, prescribed treatment or operation conditions, and schedule for

each O&M task;

A description of potential operating problems;

Quality Assurance Plan for O&M;

Alternate procedures to prevent releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances,

pollutants, or contaminants, which may endanger health and the environment or cause an

exceedance of any cleanup standard;

Corrective action to be implemented in the event that cleanup standards for soil, surface water,

and sediment are exceeded and a schedule for implementing these corrective actions;

Safety Plan for O&M;

Description of equipment; and

Records and reporting mechanisms required.

3.12.1.9 Construction Quality Assurance Plan (SOW Task 12.12)

BMcD will submit as part of the Prefinal Design a draft Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Plan.

The CQA Plan will be prepared in accordance with Construction Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste

Landfill Disposal Facilities (USEPA, 1986). The CQA Plan will be finalized and submitted with the

Final Design. At a minimum, the draft CQA Plan shall provide requirements for the following elements:


WP_03.docx 3-23 02/06/2012

CQA personnel qualifications;

Inspection activities;

Sampling requirements; and

Documentation requirements.

3.12.2 Prefinal Design Review (SOW Task 12.6)

BMcD will participate in a Prefinal Design review meeting. The meeting will be held at ODEQ’s

Oklahoma City Office. BMcD will consolidate and respond to intermediate and prefinal design review

comments.

3.12.3 Final Design / 100% Design Submittal (SOW Task 12.5)

Following the Prefinal Design Review meeting, a written response will be provided for each comment.

The response will indicate whether the design change will be implemented, and how the change will

impact the selected remedy, costs, and schedule. A summary of the responses to comments will be

submitted to the ODEQ Project Manager. The design changes shall be incorporated as part of the 100%

Design submittal, and the 100% Design document will be submitted.

3.12.4 Subcontract Award Documents (SOW Task 12.7)

Following ODEQ’s approval of the Final Design, BMcD will prepare complete contract documents,

including:

Complete RA SOW, including drawings and specifications, complete cost proposal, and the

required schedule;

Terms and conditions of the contract including payments, delivery schedule, point of delivery,

and acceptance criteria;

Method of procurement including evaluation basis, and method of awarding contract;

Criteria to be employed in evaluating bids and offers;

Prevailing wage determinations;

Deadline and location for submitting bids and offers; and

Appropriate contract clauses.

3.13 POSTREMEDIAL DESIGN SUPPORT (SOW TASK 13.0)

If requested by ODEQ, as part of the Postremedial Design Support, BMcD will provide support required

to prepare contract bidding documents and issue Invitation for Bids or Requests for Proposals. This task


WP_03.docx 3-24 02/06/2012

begins with ODEQ’s approval of contract documents developed under Section 3.12.4 and ends with the

submittal of construction contractors’ bids. The following postremedial design activities will be

performed by BMcD:

Prebid Activities

o Prebid meetings;

o Resolution of inquiries and/or issuing addenda; and

o On-site visits.

Preaward Activities

o Assist owner with determination of Responsible Bidders, perform reference checks, and

perform bid analysis;

o Receipt and review of follow-up items from lowest responsible bidder; and

o Review of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Notice of Exemption (NOE)

requirements and Small Disadvantage Business (SDB) Subcontracting Plans.

Update Site-Specific Plans

o Modify SMP;

o Modify SAP;

o Modify HASP; and

o Modify CIP.

Construction Phase Services

3.14 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT (SOW TASK 14.0)

During the contract closeout phase of the project, BMcD will return documents to ODEQ; duplicate,

distribute, and store files; archive files; and prepare a project Closeout Report. A breakdown of final

costs in the same detail and format as Attachment 2 of the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) will be provided.

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan Schedule Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_04.docx 4-1 02/06/2012

4.0 SCHEDULE

4.1 SEQUENTIAL APPROACH

The general sequential approach for the RD was outlined in Section 1.5. A detailed project schedule is

provided on Table 4-1, and it is graphically represented on Figure 4-1. The sequence for project

deliverables is provided on Table 4-2. The RD sequence will generally proceed with planning,

investigation, evaluation/reporting, and design as follows:

1. Project Planning

2. Investigation - Site reconnaissance, survey, soil sampling, sediment sampling, and

hydrogeological investigation

3. Investigation – Ground Water: Collection of ground water and surface water elevation

measurements and quarterly sampling begins and continues for one year

4. Evaluation/Reporting – Data Evaluation Summary Report for Soil and Geological Investigations

5. Investigation – Bench and Treatability Study

6. Evaluation/Reporting – Treatability Study Evaluation Report

7. Design – Preliminary Design

8. Design – Intermediate Design

9. Evaluation/Reporting - Data Evaluation Summary Report for Ground Water and Surface Water

Investigations

10. Design – Prefinal Design

11. Design – Final Design

12. Design – RA Contract Documents

4.2 SCHEDULE ASSUMPTIONS

The assumptions used to develop the project schedule are as follows:

Remedial Design Work Plan Schedule Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_04.docx 4-2 02/06/2012

There are no significant document review delays.

The schedule is based on a single phase of ODEQ and USEPA review/revision prior to

finalization of the document. It is assumed that writing styles, formats, technical issues, etc. are

resolved during project initiation. It is assumed that "total rewrites" will not be necessary.

No adverse weather delays during field investigation activities.

Field investigation and field testing (treatability study) are completed prior to May 20, 2012. If

field activities are not completed by this date, an additional ABB survey will be required.

SEL is able to complete analyses and provide analytical reports within 30 days of submitting

samples to the lab.

Design activities may proceed prior to the finalization of the ground water elevation

measurements as outlined in OAC 252:515-7.

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan Project Management Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_05.docx 5-1 02/06/2012

5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

5.1 PROJECT STAFFING

RD planning, field investigation, evaluation/reporting, and design activities will be conducted by BMcD

and coordinated with ODEQ. Key project personnel and other parties involved with this program are

outlined in this section and presented in Figure 5-1.

5.1.1 BMcD Project Manager

The BMcD Project Manager serves as a direct liaison between the ODEQ and BMcD project team and

coordinates all BMcD activities for the site. Ms. Sharon Shelton will serve as the Project Manager for

BMcD. The BMcD Project Manager for the RD will provide guidance, direction, and support to the

project team and will be ultimately responsible to the ODEQ for all BMcD project-related activities. The

BMcD Project Manager will be the primary point of contact between BMcD, the ODEQ Project Manager,

and all contracted services (e.g., laboratories, drillers, etc.). Responsibility for coordination with

contracted services may be delegated by the Project Manager to a project team member such as the

Project Chemist, Field Site Manager (FSM), or other qualified individual. Project Manager

responsibilities include implementing adequate internal controls and review procedures to eliminate

conflicts, errors, and omissions; and verifying technical accuracy.

5.1.2 BMcD Engineering Manager

The BMcD Engineering Manager is responsible for supervising and directing all engineering design

activities for the RD. Mr. Keith Connor, P.E., will serve at the Engineering Manager for BMcD. The

Engineering Manager for the RD will provide guidance, direction, and support to the design team and will

be responsible for all engineering deliverables for the project. The BMcD Engineering Manager will be

the secondary point of contact between BMcD and the ODEQ Project Manager.

5.1.3 BMcD Field Site Manager / Project Geologist

Mr. David Barker will serve as the FSM for field activities. The FSM is responsible for supervising all

field investigation activities. The FSM reports directly to the BMcD Project Manager. The FSM will

have direct responsibility for field investigation activities and for continued daily adherence to the quality

standards set forth in the RD FSP and QAPP. Additional responsibilities for the FSM/Project Geologist

include:

Verify appropriate procedures and analyses to achieve project DQOs;


WP_05.docx 5-2 02/06/2012

Estimate costs for any subcontracted geologic services including drilling;

Prepare purchase orders/authorizations and schedule for any subcontracted

geologic/hydrogeologic services;

Answer questions concerning monitoring well installation and development techniques;

Track the receipt of deliverables; and

Inform the BMcD QC Director and BMcD Project Manager of the project status and any potential

problems that may jeopardize the quality of project geologic and hydrogeologic data.

5.1.4 BMcD Health and Safety Manager

Mr. Eric Wenger will serve as the Health and Safety Manager (HSM) for this project. The HSM is a

Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) who will provide professional support by reviewing all health and

safety programs as they apply to this project. The HSM will approve the RD HASP and all modifications

to the plan as they affect the health and safety of field personnel. The HSM is responsible for providing

professional health and safety support and oversight management to the site health and safety supervisor

(SHSS). The HSM will review and provide support in all concerns regarding the health and safety of

field personnel assigned to this project. Periodic field audits of the project work site may be conducted by

the HSM to evaluate the adequacy of the program and implement any necessary changes.

5.1.5 BMcD Site Health and Safety Supervisor

A SHSS will be identified prior to the start of field activities. Responsibilities of the SHSS are discussed

fully in Section 2.0 of the RD HASP. The SHSS will be responsible for decisions regarding the

immediate safety of investigation personnel, and will report to BMcD’s HSM, FSM, and Project

Manager.

The SHSS is responsible for overseeing personnel on the site, maintaining proper medical surveillance,

providing hazard communication information, training employees in safe operating procedures, and

advising the HSM and Project Manager on matters concerning the health and safety of employees or the

public. The SHSS may be required to perform various types of area or personnel monitoring to verify

worker exposure and ensure the proper selection of PPE. The SHSS should be consulted before any

changes in the recommended procedures or levels of PPE are made.


WP_05.docx 5-3 02/06/2012

5.1.6 BMcD Quality Control Director

The QC Director serves as the senior reviewer, providing technical QC, oversight, and direction for all

aspects of the planning, execution, analyses, and reporting of the RD at the site. The QC Director, Mr.

Tracy Cooley, will insure that the requirements established in BMcD’s Corporate Quality Control

Manual (BMcD, 2010) are met for report and design reviews. The QC Director will select Review Team

members for each discipline from personnel that are not directly involved in the project. Members of the

Review Team will have qualifications, experience, and expertise equivalent to that of the Design Team.

5.1.7 BMcD Project Chemist

The BMcD Project Chemist oversees the activities involving the field procedures for chemical samples,

laboratory analyses, chemical sample documentation procedures, and tracking of chemical samples. The

chemist also coordinates data validation of analytical laboratory deliverables. Ms. Shauna Lawrence will

serve as the Project Chemist for the RD activities.

The project chemist often serves as the point-of-contact for subcontracted analytical laboratories with

responsibilities as described below:

Verify appropriate analyses to achieve project DQOs;

Estimate costs for analytical services for any subcontracted laboratory services;

Prepare purchase orders/authorizations for any subcontracted laboratory services;

Schedule analytical services and order adequate/appropriate sample containers;

Confirm sample receipt and laboratory log-in;

Answer questions from the laboratory concerning sample anomalies and coordinate resolution of

data evaluation issues between BMcD and the laboratory;

Track the receipt of deliverables; and,

Inform the BMcD QC Director and BMcD Project Manager of the project status and any potential

laboratory problems that may jeopardize the quality of project data.

5.1.8 BMcD Project Engineer

Mr. Brian Weis will serve as the Project Engineer, responsible for the overall design effort.


WP_05.docx 5-4 02/06/2012

Responsibilities for the project engineer include:

Reports to the Engineering Manager;

Implements design approach and criteria with guidance from the Engineering Manager;

Follows established standards, procedures, policies, and applicable codes;

Requests assistance from Engineering Manager when needed;

Supervises assigned detailers and drafters;

Performs BMcD Q3 Review of specifications, drawings, and design notes representing the design

when the drawings are complete;

Performs BMcD Q4 Review of designs by others when assigned to do so;

Maintains design notes in proper format and legible so that the Q4 Review of design may be

accomplished with a minimum of consultation; and,

Performs all duties carefully, in a conscientious manner so as to reduce the number of errors to a

minimum.

5.1.9 BMcD Project Team

The BMcD Project Team will be experienced in site investigations and RDs and will have shown

technical proficiency in their respective professional areas of expertise. They will be familiar with

internal review processes and specific details for this project. Members of the BMcD Project Team are

responsible for conducting project work in the field or in the office. Their responsibilities include:

Preparing planning documents and reports;

Conducting field work;

Reporting progress and problems to the Project Manager;

Implementing and/or recommending corrective actions regarding project activities to the

Project Manager; and,

Reviewing and correcting their own work prior to submittal to the Project Manager.


WP_05.docx 5-5 02/06/2012

The members of the BMcD Project Team have authority to take the following actions:

Require or perform "on-the-spot" corrections of deficiencies found during project execution;

and,

Implement and/or recommend corrective actions regarding project activities to the Project

Manager.

5.2 PROJECT COORDINATION

ODEQ has contracted BMcD to support ODEQ’s CA with USEPA and to perform the RD for the TFM

Site. BMcD will report directly to the ODEQ Project Manager. BMcD will have primary responsibility

to prepare and execute project plans, reports, designs, and specifications for the RD of the TFM Site.

Activities performed by BMcD will be coordinated with the ODEQ and USEPA.

5.2.1 Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality

The ODEQ is the lead agency for the TFM Site and has entered into a CA with the USEPA to conduct an

RD of the TFM Site. The ODEQ will direct overall project efforts. ODEQ and USEPA will be

responsible for final approval of environmental data and decisions based on data related to the facility.

Ms. Sara Downard will serve as the ODEQ Project Manager. The primary responsibilities for the ODEQ

Project Manager are as follows:

Overall responsibility for project coordination;

Review and approve the project documents and subsequent revisions;

Ensure implementation of project documents;

Coordinate community involvement activities;

Coordinate sample analysis with the SEL; and,

Coordinate involvement of USEPA Region 6.

5.2.2 United States Environmental Protection Agency

The ODEQ has entered into a CA with the USEPA to conduct the RD of the TFM Site. The USEPA is

providing overall regulatory oversight of the RD. USEPA has review responsibilities for the project

plans, reports, designs, and specifications that are being developed as part of this project. Mr. Michael

Torres will serve as the USEPA Region 6 Project Manager, and he will oversee USEPA reviews of

project documents and subsequent revisions.


WP_05.docx 5-6 02/06/2012

5.3 PROJECT TEAM ACTIVITIES

The Project Team is responsible for conducting all field and office work associated with the project. This

project will require completion of field logbooks and Chain-of-Custody (COC) forms, along with other

necessary field documentation forms, as discussed in the FSP, which is Volume I of the SAP. In addition,

this project will require the completion of designs and specifications per requirements outlined in the

project planning documents and as outlined in BMcD’s Construction Documents and Specifications

Manual (BMcD, 2007a) and Design Drafting Standards Manual (BMcD, 2007b). As part of the project,

reviews may be conducted by members of the Project Team to ensure that the project plans are followed

and ODEQ requirements are met.

5.3.1 Routine Team Meetings

Routine Project Team meetings will be held in the field and in the office during the duration of the project

to discuss project activities, progress, and schedule.

The Project Manager will hold a project kick-off meeting for the Project Team. In the kick-off meeting,

the following items, as applicable, will be discussed:

Specific responsibilities and/or tasks of each Project Team member;

Project schedules and budgets;

General review and overview of applicable site plan documents;

Planned field activities;

Planned office activities;

Internal reporting requirements;

Review assignments;

Required forms;

Required project submittals; and,

Standard format of project documents.

The Project Manager will hold routine project status meetings in the office as necessary following the

project kick-off meeting, during field work activities, and during data evaluation, report preparation, and

design stages of the project.


WP_05.docx 5-7 02/06/2012

The FSM will be responsible for holding project meetings with the Project Team and subcontractors prior

to initiation of field work. These meetings, at a minimum, will address the following items:

Scheduled activities and assigned personnel;

Health and safety issues associated with scheduled activities;

Problems/deficiencies noted in previous field activities and how they will be corrected; and,

Any other information pertinent to field or project activities.

The FSM will document all field Project Team meetings and persons who attended on the daily quality

control reports (DQCRs), which will be provided to the Project Manager.

5.3.2 Community Involvement Activities

BMcD will maintain a good working relationship with the public during the daily activities necessary to

complete this project. BMcD will notify the ODEQ immediately upon becoming aware of any public

concerns. BMcD will attend and respond to questions at periodic public meetings and may prepare data

summaries, fact sheets, visual aids, and preliminary reports for presentation to the community as

requested by ODEQ.

5.3.3 Monthly Progress Reports

Monthly progress reports will be prepared to document the status of each work task, any problems

encountered, the budget expended, percent completion of the task, and anticipated activities for the

following month.

5.3.4 Invoicing

BMcD will provide invoices to ODEQ by the tenth day of each month or as soon after the tenth day as

technically feasible. Invoices will be categorized by tasks as outlined in the SOW (ODEQ, 2011) and

submitted using DCS Form G129e. Additional documentation regarding percent of task complete for the

billing period and for the overall project will be provided. ODEQ will notify BMcD of any changes

required to the invoice within 15 days of receipt so that BMcD can revise the invoice.

5.3.5 Project Team QA/QC Reviews During Project Execution

5.3.5.1 Routine Observations and “On-The-Spot” Corrections

Throughout the project, the Project Team will be responsible for reviewing project work and making


WP_05.docx 5-8 02/06/2012

corrections as necessary. Individual Project Team members will be responsible for providing an

appropriate level of effort in checking their work before submittal of a work product to the person in

charge of the specific task, such as the Project Manager or the FSM. The Project Manager will be

responsible for supervision of Project Team members during execution of the project. The Project

Manager will provide guidance, suggestions, and comments throughout execution of the project so that

corrections can be made by Project Team members. Frequent interaction between the Project Manager

and Project Team members throughout execution of the project will provide a high quality work product.

In the field, the FSM will be responsible for observing field activities and checking the field Project Team

members’ work for completeness, consistency, and accuracy. If a deficiency is noted, the FSM will be

responsible for implementing "on-the-spot" corrections, as appropriate, to address the deficiency and to

minimize future occurrence of a similar deficiency. If a deficiency cannot be easily corrected "on-the-

spot", the FSM will immediately notify the Project Manager so the situation can be fully addressed and

resolved. In the office, Project Team members will be responsible for checking their work products prior

to submission to the Project Manager for review. The Project Manager will be responsible for reviewing

completed work products and providing Project Team members with comments, corrections, and

revisions.

5.3.5.2 Field Reviews

Reviews may be a part of the Project Manager's overall project plan for the project. Reviews during field

activities may be conducted by a member of the Project Team, FSM, and/or the SHSS and may include

the following items:

Daily reviews of field documentation;

Daily reviews of field activities and procedures; and,

Daily reviews of health and safety procedures.

The FSM will also review field procedures at the beginning of each new field activity. The FSM will

document all field reviews and corrective actions and provide the documentation to the Project Manager.

5.3.5.3 Office Reviews

The Project Chemist will review the COC documents for samples sent to the analytical laboratory to

ensure completeness and accuracy (e.g. proper sample names and analysis, site locations and other

applicable information). The COCs will also be checked to ensure that the necessary QC samples, if any,

were collected. The Project Chemist will maintain close and continuous contact with the laboratory


WP_05.docx 5-9 02/06/2012

project manager to verify receipt of samples, timely analysis, appropriate sample batching, and receipt of

correct documentation. The Project Chemist will also review and validate analytical data from the

laboratory to ensure that data packages are complete and correct. Procedures for this review will be

outlined in the QAPP.

5.3.5.4 Report Reviews

Office reviews of reports by Project Team members will be conducted prior to submitting the report to the

ODEQ. The three distinct QC review tasks for are preformed for each study/report in accordance with

the BMcD Quality Control Manual (BMcD, 2010):

Q1R Preliminary review by independent project QC team leader to verify that the project

requirements are being met and are aligned with the planned study approach.

Q2R Intermediate review by independent project QC team to verify that the initial analysis

and conclusions are technically adequate.

Q3R Final review by independent project QC team to verify the study/report clearly and

sufficiently communicates analyses, conclusions, and recommendations and

conforms to BMcD’s and the client’s standards.

5.3.5.5 Design Reviews

Interdisciplinary reviews are provided by an independent team of professional engineers, scientists, and

support personnel at various milestones throughout execution of the project design. Specific QC tasks are

budgeted into each project and separately monitored by dedicated accounting systems for timekeeping

and manpower planning. The six distinct QC review tasks for design projects include:

Q1 Conceptual design review by an independent project QC review team of senior staff

members.

Q2 Preliminary design review by an independent project QC review team of senior staff

members.

Q3 Review of design notes, drawings and specifications by the project manager, team

leaders and design team at various milestones throughout the design.

Q4 Final review of design notes, drawings and specifications by an independent project

QC review team of senior staff members.


WP_05.docx 5-10 02/06/2012

Q5 Review of “rough draft” specifications by an independent team in our specifications

department.

Q6 Final review of drawings, specifications and cost estimates by the review team in the

company’s QC department.

5.3.5.6 Corrective Actions

Upon completion of any type of review by the Project Manager, a Project Team member (e.g., the FSM)

or other reviewer will provide immediate feedback regarding results of the review to the Project Team

members. To effectively communicate results of reviews, meetings will be held as necessary between

reviewers and the Project Team. These meetings will also be used to explore the most effective ways to

improve quality of work products. Project Team members and the Project Manager will then incorporate

necessary corrective actions to improve quality of work products.

5.4 ASSURANCES TO THE GOVERNMENT

Implementation of this RD Work Plan provides a commitment from BMcD to the ODEQ that the project

will be performed in a manner that produces work products that meet or exceed expectations for quality.

Through proper execution of this RD Work Plan, a high level of confidence can be placed in work

products delivered. This includes all aspects of field investigation activities, office work related to field

activities, and report documents, designs, and specifications produced for the project. Proper execution of

this RD Work Plan will also assure the ODEQ that deficiencies in the quality of the work product have

been minimized and that any deficiencies identified during the project have been properly corrected.

* * * * *

Remedial Design Work Plan References Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing - Collinsville, Oklahoma

WP_06.docx 6-1 02/06/2012

6.0 REFERENCES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), 2000. Public Health Assessment for Tulsa

Fuel and Manufacturing – Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, CERCLIS No. OKD987096175.

July 27.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007. Final Remedial Investigation Report for

Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma. August.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007a. Construction Documents and

Specifications Manual. December 10.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2007b. Design Drafting Standards Manual.

December 10.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2010. Quality Control Manual. September 1.

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. (BMcD), 2011. Site Visit Report. November 7.

Exponent, 2001. Focused Remedial Investigation, Collinsville Smelter Site. Prepared for Phelps Dodge

Corporation. January.

Miser, Hugh D., 1954, United States Geological Survey and Oklahoma Geologic Survey. Geologic Map

of Oklahoma.

National Water and Climate Center (NWCC), 2005. Wind Rose Data for Tulsa International Airport

1961 – 1990. Available at: http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/climate/windrose.html.

National Weather Service (NWS), 2011. Tulsa, Oklahoma Climatology. April 1. Available at:

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/tsa/climate/tulsacli.html

Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC), 2004. Title 785: Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Chapter

45: Oklahoma’s Water Quality Standards, Appendix A: Designated Beneficial Uses for Surface

Waters. July 1.

Oklahoma Climatological Society (OCS), 2011. Number of Tornados by County. June 22. Available at:

http://www.ocs.ou.edu


WP_06.docx 6-2 02/06/2012

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 1994. Site Inspection Report, Tulsa Fuel &

Manufacturing, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. EPA ID No. OKD987096195. September 30.

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2001. Community Relations Plan for Tulsa

Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site, Tulsa County, Collinsville, Oklahoma. November 8.

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2011, Consultant Statement of Work for the

Remedial Design for the Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site, August.

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), 2011b. Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing

Superfund Site Community Involvement Plan, August.

Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH), 1992. Preliminary Assessment, Acme Brick Strip Mines,

Collinsville, Oklahoma, Tulsa County. November 16.

Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory (ONHI), 2003. Oklahoma Biological Survey, Federal and State

Endangered, Threatened, and Candidate Species in Oklahoma by County. May 5. Available at:

http://www.biosurvey.ou.edu\heritage\publicat.html

Smith, Gilda, 2000. Collinsville Today. Available at:

http://www.greatertulsa.com/collinsvilleok/today.html.

Tulsa Geologic Survey, 1972. Tulsa’s Physical Environment, Tulsa Geological Society Digest, Vol. 37,

1972.

United States Census Bureau (USCB), 2011. State and County Quick Facts. October 18. Available at:

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), 1977. Soil Survey of Tulsa County, Oklahoma.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1986. Construction Quality Assurance for

Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Facilities. February.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1988. Community Relations in Superfund, A

Handbook. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. OSWER Directive 9230.0-3B.


WP_06.docx 6-3 02/06/2012

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1992. Guidance to Management of

Investigation-Derived Wastes. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Publication

9345.3-03FS.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1995. Remedial Design/Remedial Action

Handbook. OSWER 9355.0-04B, EPA 540/R-95/059. June.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1999. Removal Assessment Report. Tulsa

Fuel and Manufacturing Site, Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. CERCLIS #:

OKD987096195. May 14.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2004. Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Fact

Sheet. June.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2008. Record of Decision. Tulsa Fuel &

Manufacturing Superfund Site, Collinsville, Tulsa County, Oklahoma. November.

* * * * *

TABLES

Table 1-1Cleanup Levels for Chemicals of Concern

Remedial DesignTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing, Collinsville, Oklahoma

Media Units Available Use

Soil Residental Nonresidential

Arsenic mg/kg 37 200

Cadmium mg/kg 75 560

Lead mg/kg 500 1,000

Sediment Residential/Nonresidential

Arsenic mg/kg 181

Cadmium mg/kg 813

Lead mg/kg 500

Surface Water Residential/Nonresidential

Cadmium µg/L 238

µg/L - micrograms per litermg/kg - milligrams per kilogram

K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 1-1 Cleanup Levels.xls

Table 1-1Page 1 of 1

Table 3-1Geological and Waste Investigations

Sample Collection and Field Activities SummaryTulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design

Number of SEL Analytical Samples

MatrixNumber of Locations

TCLP As, Cd, and Pb

Total As, Cd, and Pb

Subcontract Analytical Comments

Task 4.2.2 Conduct Geological Investigation (Soil, Sediments, and Visual Waste)Soil

Surface Soil 20 20 20Subsurface Soil 20 40 40

SedimentTFM Pond 1 5 5 10TFM Pond 2 4 4 8TFM Pond 3 4 4 8TFM Pond 4 2 2 4Mid-Site Ravine 5 5 10

Strip Mine Pit 8 8 24

Extent of smelter materials slumping into Strip Mine Pit is unknown. Approximately three (3) days sampling by boat is planned. Sediment samples will be collected in a grid pattern at varying distances from shore. A sediment core device will

be pushed to depth, and samples will be collected from three (3) depths at each location. Only samples from eight (8) locations will be submitted to the lab. Samples will be submitted for analysis of Total As, Cd, and Pb from each depth

interval collected and TCLP As, Cd, and Pb from only one (1) depth interval per location.

Other locations 8 8 16

Samples included for miscellaneous drainages associated with the site. Samples will be collected if visual survey indicates that there are additional drainages beyond those identified in the RI, which should be characterized. The sampling rationale

will follow that described for TFM Ponds 1 through 4 and the Strip Mine Pit.Test Pits

Characterization - within waste material area

6 6

Characterization - perimeter of waste

material area9 9 9

Additional test pits to determine horizontal and vertical extent of waste materials. Fine material (soil and/or waste materials) will be collected for characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurence of waste to

assess the need for stabilization of the soil.

Characterization - isolated waste material areas

5 5 5Additional test pits to determine horizontal and vertical extent of waste materials in isolated areas where waste materials

have been identified. Fine material (soil and/or waste materials) will be collected for characterization. Soil samples will be collected from the soil under the deepest occurence of waste to assess the need for stabilization of the soil.

Cap Materials 7 7

Geotechnical;Tulsa County

OSU Extension Office

Test pits and borings from various potential borrow areas on the Site. Analytical to include subcontracted geotechnical and analysis for total As, Cd, and Pb to determine soil concentration relative to ROD RAO. Based on findings, additional sample collection at later date for full analysis (i.e., VOC, SVOC, RCRA metals, pesticides, PCBs, and herbicides) will be performed.

Samples will also be collected for analysis by the Tulsa County OSU Extension Office to determine fertility needs for maximum growing effectiveness.

Visual WasteOn-Site 4 8 8Adjacent to Site 4 8 8

Additional surface soil and direct-push characterization to further define on-site materials. Estimate approximately 20 surface locations and 20 subsurface locations with samples from two (2) depths per location.

Visual survey of site and areas adjacent to site for waste materials. This is estimated to be one day on-site and one day off-site. If suspected smelter materials are encountered, then a sample will be collected. Estimate approximately eight (8)

locations with samples from two (2) depths per location.

TFM Ponds 1, 2, 3, and 4 and the Mid-Site Ravine exhibit concentrations of As, Cd, and/or Pb that exceed Sediment RAOs established in ROD. Additional sampling is needed to determine the vertical extent of contamination (two [2] depths

sampled for each location for Total As, Cd, and Pb). Additional characterization of sediments from these areas is also needed to determine need for stabilization (one [1] sample each location from surface interval for TCLP As, Cd, and Pb).

Only one RI pond sediment sample analyzed for TCLP As, Cd, and Pb.

Additional test pits to determine vertical extent of waste materials in and around the former smelter operations area. Soil samples will be collected from the native clay under the waste to assess the need for stabilization of the native clay.

K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 3-1.xlsx Page 1 of 2

Table 3-1Geological and Waste Investigations




TCLP As, Cd, and Pb


Subcontract Analytical Comments

Task 4.2.5 Conduct Investigation Derived Waste Investigation

No analysis needed. Waste generated during the RD will be disposed on-site accoding to USEPA's Guide to Management of IDW, 9345.3-03FS. IDW generated during the RI will be assessed and recontainerized as needed.

Task 4.2.7 Dispose of Investigation Derived Waste InvestigationRI Drums

SoilIncludes inspection of RI IDW drums for integrity. Based on ODEQ 6/17/11 inventory, there are currently 11 soil drums

present from the RI. No analysis is needed; however, drums will be assessed for integrity and content recontainerized as needed. It was assumed that all 11 drums would require recontainerization.

As - Arsenic RAO - Remedial Action ObjectiveCd - Cadmium RCRA - Resource Conservation and Recovery ActPb - Lead RD - Remedial DesignAASHTO - American Association of State Highway and RI - Remedial Investigation Transporation Officals ROD - Record of DecisionASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials SVOC - Semivolatile Organic CompoundBMcD - Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc. TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureIDW - Investigation Derived Waste TFM - Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing

Geotechnical (Cap Materials) - Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), Soil Bulk Density (AASHTO T233), Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216), Standard Proctor (ASTM D698), and Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557)


Table 3-2Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations





Field-Filtered As, Cd, and Pb

Total As, Cd, Mn, Pb,

and ZnWater

QualitySubcontract

Analytical CommentsTask 4.2.3 Conduct Hyrdogeological Investigation - Ground Water

Borings 6

Geophysicial and

Geotechnical Testing

To meet conditions in OAC 252:515-7-3, six (6) borings will be advanced using coring methods. Geophysical logs consisting of gamma ray/neutron will be obtained from three (3) of the borings. One soil sample from each type of soil

encountered will be submitted for geotechnical analysis of Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), and Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216). Previous investigations indicate that there are up to four (4) types of unconsolidated materials present: a silty loam/silty sand; a

clay; a lower silty loam/silty sand; and the slag waste material.

Monitoring Well Installation

4Proposed Area of

Cap

To meet conditions of OAC 252:515-7-5 Ground Water Study, the following investigation will be required: installation of four (4) monitoring wells for monthly piezometric monitoring. These wells are to be installed in closer proximity to the

proposed capped area than the wells currently present at the site.While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore, quarterly ground water sampling is recommended to add to the RI data that support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water

and migrating off-site. Analytical sampling will include the four (4) monitoring wells installated for piezometeric monitoring of the proposed capped area, and the seven (7) existing wells installed during the RI (see below).

Ground Water Elevation Measurement

11

In accordance with OAC 252:515-7-5, Ground Water Study, ground water elevation measurements will be collected monthly. While these measurements are technically only required for the four (4) wells installed in the close proximity to

the proposed capped area, elevation measurements will be collected from all of the wells present at the site. In addition, a datalogger will be installed in one well to provide continuous measurement. (Note: Ground water elevation

measurement for four of the twelve events will be collected in conjunction with quarterly ground water sampling.

Ground Water Sampling

Quarterly Event 1 11 11 11




Task 4.2.4 Conduct Hydrogeological Investigation - Surface Water

Surface Water

Elevation Measurements

Surface water elevation measurements will be taken monthly from the on-site Ponds and the Strip Mine Pit. Activities will be conducted in conjuction with ground water elevation measurements, and the time estimate is included with that

line item.

Surface Water Sampling

TFM Pond 1 1 1 1

TFM Pond 2 1 1 1

TFM Pond 3 1 1 1

TFM Pond 4 1 1 1Mid-Site Ravine 4 4 4Strip Mine Pit 3 3 3

While the OAC 252:515-7 does not require analytical sampling during the design phase, it is known that smelter waste materials are present at depths that could intercept shallow ground water. Therefore, quarterly ground water sampling is recommended to add to the RI data that support the determination that contamination is not present in ground water and migrating off-site. Analytical sampling will include the four monitoring wells installated for piezometeric monitoring

of the proposed capped area, the two additional downgradient wells installed above, and the seven existing wells installed during the RI.

Ponds and the mid-site ravine will likely need need to be drained during construction. A one time sampling event is planned for the ponds and ravine for purposes of characterizing the water for discharge. It was assumed that this

added one (1) day onto the first quarterly ground water sampling event.


Table 3-2Hydrogeological Ground Water and Surface Water Investigations





Field-Filtered As, Cd, and Pb

Total As, Cd, Mn, Pb,

and ZnWater

QualitySubcontract

Analytical Comments

As - Arsenic ASTM - American Society for Testing and MaterialsCd - Cadmium BMcD - Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company Inc.Mn - Manganese OAC - Oklahoma Administrative CodePb - Lead RI - Remedial InvestigationZn - Zinc TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

TFM - Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing

Geotechnical (Borings) - Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), Hydraulic Conductivity (ASTM D5084), Sieve with Hydrometer (ASTM D422), and Specific Water/Moisture Content (ASTM D2216).

Water Quality - Specific conductance, pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity measures during field sampling. Laboratory analyses include: Hardness, Alkalinity, Chloride, Sulfate, Total Suspended Solids, Nitrate/Nitrite as N, Ammonia as N, Chemical Oxygen Demand, Total Organic Carbon, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, and Oil and Grease. Note: Field measurement of dissolved oxygen should be provided with Biochemical Oxygen Demand samples.


Table 4-1Remedial Design Preliminary Schedule

Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing Superfund SiteCollinsville, Oklahoma

Task Description Date CommentsSTART Notice to Proceed 09/30/11

2.0 PROJECT PLANNING AND SUPPORT2.1 Project Planning

2.1.1 Scoping Meeting 10/27/11 No Set schedule2.1.2 Site Visit 10/27/11 No Set schedule

Site Visit Report 11/07/11 10 Days After Site VisitODEQ Review 11/14/11 7 Days after Receipt

2.1.3 Evaluate Existing Information 9/30/11 - 11/28/112.1.4 Off-Site Access Agreements

Info for Adjacent Property Owners 10/19/11Off-Site Letters Sent ODEQ Lead

2.1.5 Work PlanDraft 11/28/11 30 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 12/19/11 21 Days after receipt of WPComment Review Conference Call (Work Plan and Sampling and Analysis Plan)

01/20/12 After ODEQ Review

Final 02/06/12 15 Days after Conference Call2.2 Preparation of Site-Specific Plans

2.2.1 Site Management Plan (SMP)Draft 03/07/12 30 Days after approval of RD Work

PlanODEQ Review 03/19/12 10 Days after receipt of SMPFinal 04/03/12 15 Days after recept of ODEQ

comments2.2.2 Health & Safety Plan (HASP)

Draft 12/09/11 45 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 12/30/11 21 Days after receipt of HASPFinal 01/16/12 15 Days after recept of ODEQ

comments2.2.3 Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) [Quality

Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) + Field Sampling Plan (FSP)] and Data Management Plan (DMP)

Draft 12/09/11 45 Days after Scoping MeetingODEQ Review 01/12/12 21 Days after receipt of documents

Final 02/06/12 15 Days after Work Plan Conference Call

2.3 Project Management2.3.1 Monthly Progress Reports 10th of Month By 10th of Each Month2.3.2 Meeting Participation / Routine

CommunicationsEach Week Weekly Update Calls/Emails

2.3.3 Contract Closeout2.4 Subcontract Procurement and Support

Activities2.4.1 Identify and Procure Subcontractors 02/06/12 - 03/06/12 After approval of all plans, pre-field

activities2.4.2 Establish & Carry Out QA Program for

SubcontractorsPerformed within individual data

acquisition tasks2.4.3 Subcontract Management Performed within individual data

acquisition tasks

K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-1_Schedule.xlsx Page 1 of 6



Task Description Date Comments3.0 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

3.1 Develop Community Involvement Plan N/A ODEQ Task3.2 Prepare Fact Sheets As directed by ODEQ (Two during

course of project, early in project and post design)

3.3 Public Meetings Availability & Support As directed by ODEQ (Two during course of project, early in project

and post design)

3.4 Assisting in Maintaining Info Repository No set due dates4.0 DATA ACQUISITION

4.1 Mobilization and Demobilization4.1.1 ID Field Support Equipment & Facilities N/A Per assumptions, not needed.4.1.2 Mobilization N/A Included with each part of field

investigation (Task 4.2)4.1.3 Demobilization N/A Included with each part of field

investigation (Task 4.2)4.2 Field Investigation Phs 1: 02/29 - 03/23/12

GW1: 03/12 - 03/14/12GW2: 06/11 - 06/13/12GW3: 09/10 - 09/12/12GW4: 12/10 - 12/12/12

Dates Tentative - Subject to Subcontractor Availability and

Weather

4.2.1 Site Reconnaissance 02/29/12 1 Field Day4.2.2 Geological Investigations

Surface Soil 03/01 - 03/02/12 2 Field DaysSubsurface Soil 03/19 - 03/20/12 2 Field DaysSediment 03/15/12;

03/19 - 03/23/126 Field Days - Attempt to do when

ponds are dry.Test Pit 3/5/12 - 3/8/12 4 Field DaysVisual Waste Survey 03/01 - 03/02/12 2 Field Days

4.2.3 Hydrogeological Investigation - Ground Water

Borings 03/12 - 03/20/12 7 Field DaysWell Installation / Development 03/05 - 03/08/12 4 Field DaysGW Elevation Measurement 04/11/12

05/09/1207/11/1208/10/1210/10/1211/12/1201/11/1302/11/13

Monthly, 1 Day Each, 8 months (non-sampling)

GW Sampling Events (including elevation measurements)

03/12 - 03/14/1206/11 - 06/13/1209/10 - 09/12/1212/10 - 12/12/12

Quarterly, 3 Days Events

4.2.4 Hydrogeological Investigation - Surface Water

SW Elevation Measurement See GW Elevation Conducted with GW Elevation measurements

SW Sampling 03/21/12 1 Field Day




Task Description Date Comments4.2.5 Waste Investigation No Analysis Needed

Consolidate Waste Tires 03/09/12 Concurrent with Test Pit sampling.

4.2.6 Ecological InvestigationWildlife Observations Spring 2012 2 Field DaysAmerican Burying Beetle Survey 09/12 - 09/19/11 Conducted September 2011

4.2.7 IDW Disposal 03/09/12 Stagings of RI Drums, 1 Field Day

5.0 SAMPLE ANALYSIS5.1 SEL-Type Laboratory Analysis

Phase 1 Field Activities 03/23/12 - 04/23/12GW1 03/14/12 - 04/13/12GW2 06/13/12 - 07/13/12GW3 09/12/12 - 10/12/12GW4 12/12/12 - 01/11/13

6.0 ANALYTICAL SUPPORT AND DATA VALIDATION6.1 Prepare and Ship Environmental Samples Phs 1: 02/29 - 03/23/12

GW1: 03/12 - 03/14/12GW2: 06/11 - 06/13/12GW3: 09/10 - 09/12/12GW4: 12/10 - 12/12/12

Included within Task 4.2

6.2 Validate Data Phs 1: 04/24/12 - 05/16/12

GW1: 04/16 - 04/18/12GW2: 07/16 - 07/18/12GW3: 10/15 - 10/17/12GW4: 01/14 - 01/16/13

Assumes SEL turns data around in 30 days.

7.0 DATA EVALUATION7.1 Data Usability Evaluation and Field QA/QC 03/26/12 - 04/13/12 QA/QC of boring logs, etc.

7.2 Data Reduction, Tabulation, and Evaluation 05/12 and GW Events

7.3 Develop Data Evaluation ReportData Evaluation Report - Soil and Geological Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)

Draft 05/03/12 10 days after receipt of analytical results from laboratory

ODEQ Review 05/18/12 15 Days after receipt of document

Final 06/04/12 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ comments

Coordination with SEL prior to and during field activities. Assumed 30-

Day turn around time for SEL.




Task Description Date CommentsData Evaluation Report - Ground Water elevation measurement and sampling

Draft 01/21/13 10 Days after receipt of analytical data

ODEQ Review 02/05/13 15 Days after receipt of document


8.0 TREATABILITY STUDY AND PILOT TESTING8.1 Literature Search8.2 Develop Treatability and Pilot Study Work

PlanDraft 03/07/12 30 Days after RD Work Plan

approvalODEQ Review 03/28/12 21 Days after receipt of Work Plan


8.3 Bench Test 04/10/12 - 04/27/12 Planning, Sampling, Testing8.4 Pilot Scale Test (Not Applicable) N/A8.5 Field Test 04/30/12 - 05/18/128.6 Develop Treatability Study Report

Draft 07/17/12 60 Days after completion of treatability study

ODEQ Review 08/07/12 21 Days after receipt of reportFinal 08/22/12 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ

comments9.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN

9.1 Preliminary Design / Design Criteria Report 10/05/12 45 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report

ODEQ Review 10/26/12 21 Days after receipt of report9.1.5 Basis of Design Report Includes Task 9.3

Draft 10/05/12 45 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report

ODEQ Review 10/26/12 21 Days after receipt of reportRevision -- Revised as neededODEQ Review Dependent upon need for

Revision15 Days after receipt of report

9.1-9.2 Preliminary Plans and Specifications9.1.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Scheduling9.1.2 Preliminary Construction Schedule9.1.3 Specifications Outline9.1.4 Preliminary Drawings and Schematics

9.1.6 Preliminary RA Cost Estimate9.2 Describe Variances with the ROD

ODEQ Review 11/21/12 30 Days after receipt of plans and specs

10/22/12 60 Days after Final Treatability Study Evaluation Report




Task Description Date Comments9.4 Conduct / Assist in VE Screening

(VE Screening Report)10/22/12 60 Days after Final Treatability

Study Evaluation ReportODEQ Review 11/12/12 21 Days after receipt of report

9.6 Participate in Preliminary Design Review and Briefing

11/19/12 7 Days after receipt of ODEQ Comments

9.5 Respond to Design Review Comments 12/19/12 30 Days after Preliminary Design review meeting

ODEQ Review 01/03/13 15 Days after receipt10.0 EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, AND UTILITIES

10.1 List of Long-Lead Equipment, Services, and/or Utilities

02/01/13 30 Days after Preliminary Design approved

ODEQ Review 02/11/13 10 Days after receipt of list10.2 Plans and Specifications for Long-Lead

Procurement Items02/26/13 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ

comments on the listODEQ Review 03/13/13 15 Days after receipt

11.0 INTERMEDIATE DESIGNIntermediate Plans and Specifications11.1 Update Construction Schedule11.2 Intermediate Specifications11.3 Intermediate Drawings / Schematics11.4 Revised Basis of Design Report11.5 Revised RA Cost Estimate11.8 Describe Variances with the ROD


11.6 Participate in Intermediate Design Review Meeting and Briefing11.6.1 Initial Constructability Review11.6.2 Initial Biddability Review11.6.3 Initial Operability Review11.6.4 Initial Environmental Review11.6.5 Initial Claims Prevention Screen

11.7 VE Study and Report Recommendation (If Needed)

Dependent upon need for VE Study

30 Days after initiation of VE Study (if needed)

ODEQ Review 21 Days after receipt of report11.9 Response to Design Review Comments 03/26/13 15 Days after Review meeting

ODEQ Review 04/10/13 15 Days after receipt 12.0 PREFINAL AND FINAL DESIGN

Prefinal Plans and Specifications12.1 Prefinal Drawings and Specs12.2 Prefinal Drawings & Reductions12.3 Final Basis of Design Report12.4 Revised RA Cost Estimate12.8 Bidability, Operability, Environmental, Constructability, Claims Prevention Rvw12.9 Revised Delivery Strategy / Schedule12.10 Document VE Modifications (if rqd)12.11 Draft O&M Manual12.12 Construction Quality Assurance Plan


03/11/13 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ comments

12.1-12.4, 12.8-12.12

05/10/13 30 Days after Intermediate Design approval

11.1-11.5, 11.8

02/01/13 30 Days after Preliminary Design approved




Task Description Date Comments12.6 Participate in Prefinal/Final Design Review

and Briefing06/14/13 15 Days after receipt of ODEQ

commentsResponse to Prefinal Design Review Comments

06/28/13 15 Days after Design review meeting

ODEQ Review 07/15/13 15 Days after receipt of response

12.5 100-Percent Design 08/14/13 30 Days after resolution of Prefinal Design review comments

12.7 RA Contract DocumentsDraft 09/13/13 30 Days after Final Design approval

ODEQ Review 10/04/13 21 Days after receipt of RA documents

Final 11/04/13 30 days after receipt of ODEQ domments on Draft RA contract

documents

13.0 Post RD Support (Optional)13.0 Post RD Support (Optional)

13.1 Prebid/Presolicitation Activities13.2 Preaward Activities13.3 Update Site-Specific Plans13.4 Construction Phase Services

14.0 Work Assignment Closeout14.0 Contract Closeout 12/04/13

14.1 Return Documents to ODEQ14.2 Duplicate, Distribute, and Store Files

14.3 Archive Files14.4 Prepare Closeour Report

GW = Ground WaterIDW = Investigation-Derived WasteN/A = Not ApplicableODEQ = Oklahoma Department of Environmental QualityOKC = Oklahma City, OklahomaPhs = PhaseQA = Quality AssuranceQC = Quality ControlRA = Remedial ActionRD = Remedial DesignRI = Remedial InvestigationSW = Surface WaterSEL = Oklahoma State Environmental Lab

30 Days after submittal of Final RA Contract Documents or as

otherwise directed by ODEQ

Dependent upon Direction from ODEQ

As directed by ODEQ


Table 4-2Remedial Design Deliverables Schedule and Sequence


Task Deliverable Timing of SubmittalSubmittal Due

DateODEQ Review Period

Date for Completion of ODEQ Review

October 2011 Submittals4.2.6 American Burying Beetle

Survey Report30 days after

completion of survey10/19/2011 10 days after receipt of

report10/31/2011

November 2011 Submittals2.1.2 Site Visit Report 10 days after site visit 11/7/2011 7 days after receipt of

report11/14/2011

2.1.4 Draft Remedial Design (RD) Work Plan

30 days after scoping meeting

11/28/2011 21 days after receipt of RD Work Plan

12/19/2011

December 2011 Submittals2.2.2 Draft Health and Safety

Plan (HASP)45 days after scoping

meeting12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of

HASP12/30/2011

2.2.3 Draft Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)


12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of QAPP

12/30/2011

2.2.3 Draft Field Sampling Plan (FSP)


12/9/2011 21 days after receipt of FSP

12/30/2011

January 2012 Submittals2.2.2 Final HASP 15 days after receipt of

ODEQ comments1/16/2012 N/A --

February 2012 Submittals2.1.5 Final RD Work Plan 15 days after

Conference Call2/6/2012 N/A --

2.2.3 Final QAPP 15 days after Conference Call

2/6/2012 N/A --

2.2.3 Final FSP 15 days after Conference Call

2/6/2012 N/A --

March 2012 Submittals2.2.1 Draft Site Management

Plan (SMP)30 days after approval

of RD Work Plan3/7/2012 10 days after receipt of

SMP3/19/2012

8.2 Draft Treatability Study Work Plan

30 days after RD Work Plan Approval

3/7/2012 21 days after receipt of Treatability Study Work

Plan

3/28/2012

April 2012 Submittals2.2.1 Final SMP 15 days after receipt of


8.2 Final Treatability Study Work Plan

10 days after receipt of ODEQ comments

4/9/2012 N/A --

K:\ENV\OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\Site\64496\Deliver\WP\Final\Tables\Table 4-2_Deliverable Schedule.xlsx







May 2012 Submittals7.3 Data Evaluation

Summary Report - Soil and Geological

Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)

10 days after receipt of analytical results from

laboratory

5/3/2012 15 days after receipt of report

5/18/2012

June 2012 Submittals7.3 Final Data Evaluation

Summary Report - Soil and Geological

Investigations (Phase 1 Field Activities)


6/4/2012 NA --

July 2012 Submittals8.6 Draft Treatability Study

Evaluation Report60 days after completion of

treatability study


8/7/2012

August 2012 Submittals8.6 Final Treatability Study

Evaluation Report15 days after receipt of


October 2012 Submittals9.1 Design Criteria Report 45 days after Final

Treatability Study Report


10/26/2012

9.1.5 Basis of Design Report 45 days after Final Treatability Study

Report


10/26/2012

9.1.4 Preliminary Plans and Specifications (Note 1)

60 days after Final Treatability Study

Report

10/22/2012 30 days after receipt of plans and specs

11/21/2012

9.4 Value Engineering (VE) Screening Report

60 days after Final Treatability Study

Report


11/12/2012

December 2012 Submittals9.5 Response to Preliminary

Design Review Comments

30 days after design review meeting

12/19/2012 15 days after receipt of response

1/3/2013

January 2013 Submittals7.3 Data Evaluation

Summary Report - Groundwater (GW)

elevation measurement and GW sampling

10 days after receipt of analytical results from

laboratory


2/5/2013








February 2013 Submittals10.1 List of Long-Lead

Procurement Items30 days after

Preliminary Design approved

2/1/2013 10 days after receipt of list

2/11/2013

11.0 Intermediate Plans and Specifications (Note 2)

30 days after Preliminary Design

approved


2/22/2013

7.3 Final Data Evaluation Summary Report - GW


2/20/2013 NA --

10.2 Plans and Specifications for Procurements of

Long-Lead Procurement Items

15 days after receipt of ODEQ comments on

the Long-Lead Procurement Item List


3/13/2013

March 2013 Submittals11.9 Response to

Intermediate Design Review Comments

15 days after design review meeting

3/26/2013 15 days after the receipt of response

4/10/2013

May 2013 Submittals12.0 Prefinal Plans and

Specifications (Note 3)30 days after

Intermediate design approved


5/31/2013

June 2013 Submittals12.6 Response to Prefinal

Design review comments15 days after design

review meeting6/28/2013 15 days after receipt of

response7/15/2013

August 2013 Submittals12.5 100 Percent Design 30 days after resolution

of Prefinal Design review comments

8/14/2013 N/A --

September 2013 Submittals12.7 Draft Remedial Action

(RA) Contract Documents

30 days after Final Design approved

9/13/2013 21 days after receipt of RA Contract Documents

10/4/2013

November 2013 Submittals12.7 Final RA Contract

Documents30 days after receipt of ODEQ comments on

draft documents

11/4/2013 N/A --

ITEMS WITH DUE DATES DEPENDENT UPON NEED FOR TASK3.2 Fact Sheets As needed -- 15 days after receipt of

fact sheet--

9.1.5 Basis of Design Report (Revision)

Revised and distributed as necessary

-- 15 days after receipt of report

--

11.7 VE Report (if needed) 30 days after initiation of VE Study

-- 21 days after receipt of report

--








Note 1 = Preliminary Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:9.1.1 Project Delivery Strategy and Scheduling9.1.2 Preliminary RA Schedule9.1.3 Specifications Outline9.1.4 Preliminary Drawings and Schematics9.1.5 Basis of Design Report9.1.6 Preliminary RA Cost Estimate

9.2 Variances from the ROD

Note 2 = Intermediate Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:11.1 Update Construction Schedule11.2 Intermediate Specifications11.3 Intermediate Drawings and Schematics11.4 Revised Basis of Design Report11.5 RA Cost Estimate11.8 Variances from the ROD

Note 3 = Prefinal Plans and Specifications Submittal Items:12.1 Prefinal Drawings and Specifications12.2 Prefinal Drawings Reductions12.3 Final Basis of Design Report12.4 Revised RA Cost Estimate12.7 Subcontract Award Documents12.8 Bid availability, Operability, and Constructability Reviews12.9 Revised Project Delivery Strategy and Schedule

12.10 Document VE Modifications (If needed)12.11 Draft O&M Manual12.12 CQA Plan



FIGURES

Collinsville Smelter

Collinsville Strip Mine

Tulsa Fueland

Manufacturing

Mid-Site RavineIntermittent Drainage

Access Road/Driveway

"Old" U.S. Highway 169

136th Street

Blackjack Creek

ACME BrickStrip Mines

HorsepenCreek

Caney River

Intermittent DrainageStrip Mine Pit

126th Street

U\Tu

lsa Fu

els\A

RC\Ar

cDoc

s\WP F

igures

\Fina

l\Fig2

-1Site

_Loc

ation

_Map

_11X

17.m

xd

mrb t

c 05

/16/20

05 1

:2400

0 Site Location

LEGENDSite BoundaryCollinsville Smelter and Strip MineHydrographyRailroadsRoads

Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic MapCollinsville Oklahoma, 1980

Figure 2-1SITE LOCATION MAP

TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK

NORTH

840 0 840 1,680S C A L E I N F E E T

Former Strip Mine Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)

Strip Mine Pit

Former Residence

Pond 5

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 1Pond 2

Fu

rna

ce9

Fu

rna

ce8

Fu

rna

ce7

Fu

rna

ce6

Fu

rna

ce5

Fu

rna

ce4

Fu

rna

ce3

Fu

rna

ce2

Fu

rna

ce1

Ope

n O

reBi

nsWarehouse

MetalShed

Ore Bins

Mechanical Building

CrushingRooms

CisternSupplyHouse

Machine ShopBlacksmithBlacksmith

Office

Gate

136th Street

Attchinson TopekaSanta Fe Railroad

Blackjack Creek

Faith AssemblyChurch

Sou

th 1

2th

Str

eet

"Old

" U.S

. Hig

hway

169


Intermittent Drainage


RW-01

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-2_Site_Topography_Collinsville_Sanborn.mxd sos Nov 21, 2011


SITE TOPOGRAPHY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC MAP

Figure 2-2LEGEND

Residential Well

Site Boundary

Former Building

Blackberry Bushes

Chain-Link Fence

Hydrography

Former Railroad

Railroad

NORTH

300 0 300

S C A L E I N F E E T

FormerResidence

FormerSmelterOperationsArea

Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad

Former Strip Mining Area(Acme Brick Strip Mine)

FaithAssemblyChurch

Access Road/Driveway "Old" U.S. Highway 169

South 12th Street


Cistern

Strip Mine Pit

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2Pond 1

Pond 5


Blackjack Creek

Gate

Intermitte

nt Drainage

RW-01

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-3_Site_Layout_Map_17x11.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012

LEGEND

Residential Well

Site Boundary

Water Bodies

Treed Areas

Waste Materials Encountered

Grassy Areas

Blackberry Bushes

Chain-Link Fence


Former Smelter Oper. Area

Slag Road

Roads

TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURINGCollinsville, OK

SITE FEATURE MAP

Figure 2-3

NOTE:

The Access Road / Drivewayis composed of waste materials.

300 0 300


N

EC-02

TFM

PZ-09

PZ-07

PZ-04

Pond 1

SP-21SP-19

SP-53

SP-50SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37

SP-36SP-34

SP-30

SP-33

SP-28 SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24

SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16

TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13

TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10

TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15

SP-07

SP-06SP-05SP-04SP-02

SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39

SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




SP-54

SP-60

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-59

SP-58

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-4_RI_Soil_Results_VS_RAOs_Half_Ft.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012


RI SOIL RESUTSVS RAOs (0 - 0.5 FT BGS)

Figure 2-4

LEGEND

Surface

Surface/Subsurface

Temporary Piezometer

Trenching

Ecological / Vegetation

Site Boundary

Water Bodies

Sample Result Between ResidentialAnd Nonresidential RAO

Sample Result < Residential RAO

Sample Result > Nonresidential RAO



Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300


Soil samples were collected at locations TFM and EC-02 alongthe eastern fenceline during ecological / vegetation samplingof blackberry bushes.

The Access Road / Driveway is composed of waste materials.

Soil samples were collected from 0 - 0.5 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).

Soil RAOs are as follows: Arsenic: Residential = 37 mg/kg, Nonresidential = 200 mg/kg Cadmium: Residential = 75 mg/kg, Nonresidential = 560 mg/kg Lead: Residential = 500 mg/kg, Nonresidential = 1,000 mg/kg

If any consituent exceeded the RAO, then the location washighlighted as an exceedance.

mg/kg = milligrams per kilogramRAO = Remedial Action Objective

NOTE:

EC-02

TFM

PZ-09

PZ-07

PZ-04

Pond 1

SP-21SP-19

SP-53

SP-50SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37

SP-36SP-34

SP-30

SP-33

SP-28 SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24

SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16

TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13

TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10

TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15

SP-07


SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39

SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




SP-54

SP-60

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-59

SP-58

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-5_RI_Soil_Results_VS_RAOs_2FT.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012


RI SOIL RESUTSVS RAOs (0.5 - 2 FT BGS)

Figure 2-5

LEGEND

Surface

Surface/Subsurface


Trenching


Site Boundary

Water Bodies

Sample Result Between ResidentialAnd Nonresidential RAO





Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300




Soil samples were collected from 0.5 - 2 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).




NOTE:

EC-02

TFM

PZ-09

PZ-07

PZ-04

Pond 1

SP-21SP-19

SP-53

SP-50SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37

SP-36SP-34

SP-30

SP-33

SP-28 SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24

SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16

TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13

TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10

TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15

SP-07


SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39

SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




SP-54

SP-60

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-59

SP-58

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-6_RI_Soil_Results_VS_RAOs_4FT.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012


RI SOIL RESUTSVS RAOs (2 - 4 FT BGS)

Figure 2-6

LEGEND

Surface

Surface/Subsurface


Trenching


Site Boundary

Water Bodies





Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300




Soil samples were collected from 2 - 4 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).




NOTE:

EC-02

TFM

PZ-09

PZ-07

PZ-04

Pond 1

SP-21SP-19

SP-53

SP-50SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37

SP-36SP-34

SP-30

SP-33

SP-28 SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24

SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16

TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13

TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10

TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15

SP-07


SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39

SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




SP-54

SP-60

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-59

SP-58

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-7_RI_Soil_Results_VS_RAOs_over_4FT.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012


RI SOIL RESUTSVS RAOs (> 4 FT BGS)

Figure 2-7

LEGEND

Surface

Surface/Subsurface


Trenching


Site Boundary

Water Bodies





Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300




Soil samples were collected from greater than 4 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).




NOTE:

EC-02

TFM

PZ-09

PZ-07

PZ-04

Pond 1

SP-21SP-19

SP-53

SP-50SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37

SP-36SP-34

SP-30

SP-33

SP-28 SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24

SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16

TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13

TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10

TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15

SP-07


SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39

SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




SP-54

SP-60

SP-55

SP-56

SP-57SP-59

SP-58

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-8_Estimated_Depth_of_Waste_Materials.mxd sos Jan 7, 2012


ESTIMATED DEPTH OFWASTE MATERIALS

Figure 2-8

LEGEND

Surface

Surface/Subsurface


Trenching


Site Boundary

Water Bodies



Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300


< 1 FT BGS

1 - 2 FT BGS

2 - 3 FT BGS

3 - 5 FT BGS

5 - 7 FT BGSAreas were smelter waste was visually observedduring the Remedial Investigation are shown.

The values presented on the figure indicate themaximum depth at which waste materials were observed.

The Access Road/Driveway is composed of waste materials.Depth will be confirmed during the remedial design investigationactivities.

ft bgs = feet below ground surface

NOTE:

ESTIMATED DEPTH OF WASTE MATERIALSVISUALLY OBSERVED DURING RI

OFF-03

Strip Mine Pit


Pond 5

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2 Pond 1

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea


Blackjack Creek



South 12th StreetFaithAssemblyChurch


FormerResidence


FP-03

FP-02

FP-01

OFF-20

OFF-19

OFF-18

OFF-17

OFF-16

OFF-15

OFF-14

OFF-01

OFF-04

OFF-02

MSR-03 OFF-05

OFF-06OFF-07

OFF-08PD1-03

PD1-02

PD1-01

OFF-09

OFF-10

PD2-02

PD2-01

PD3-02

PD3-01

PD4-01

PD5-01

MSR-02

CST-01

MSR-01

OFF-13

OFF-12

OFF-11

SMP-06

SMP-05

SMP-04

SMP-03

SMP-02SMP-01


RI SEDIMENT RESULTSVS

RAOs

Figure 2-9

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-9_RI_Sediment_Results_VS_RAOs.mxd sos Nov 21, 2011

300 0 300


N

LEGEND

Surface Water and SedimentSample Locations

Sample Result > RAO

Site Boundary

Water Bodies




Hydrography

Roads

PD4

MSR Mid Site RavineSMP

PD5 Pond 5

Pond 4

PD3 Pond 3PD2 Pond 2PD1 Pond 1CST Cistern

Strip Mine PitNOTE:

Sediment samples were collected from 0 - 0.5 feetbelow ground surface (ft bgs).

Sediment RAOs are as follows: Arsenic = 181 mg/kg Cadmium = 813 mg/kg Lead = 500 mg/kg



Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




MW-05

MW-04

MW-03

MW-02

MW-01

RW-01

MW-06MW-04D

Pond 1

Figure 2-10

RIMONITORING WELLS


U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig2-10_RI_Monitoring_Wells.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012

LEGEND

Monitoring Well

Residential Well

Site Boundary

Water Bodies




Hydrography

Roads

300 0 300


N

Pond 1

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




TP-07

TP-05

SP-64

TP-04

SP-63

SP-62SP-61

TP-01

TP-03

TP-02

TP-06

TR-25

TR-26

TR-27

TR-30

TR-29

TR-28

TR-24TR-23

TR-22TR-32TR-31

TR-41

TR-33TR-40

TR-36TR-35TR-34

TR-37TR-38

TR-39

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-1_New_Soil_Waste_Sample_Location.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012


SOIL AND WASTESAMPLE LOCATION MAP

Figure 3-1

LEGEND

Surface/Subsurface

Test Pit (Characterization)

Test Pit (Cap Materials)

Site Boundary

Water Bodies




Hydrography

Roads

N300 0 300


Additional soil sample locations will be selectedbased on observations made during theVisual Waste Survey (20 soil sample locationsare planned).

NOTE:

Strip Mine Pit


Pond 5

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2Pond 1

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea Atchinson Topeka Santa Fe Railroad

Blackjack Creek



South 12th StreetFaithAssemblyChurch


FormerResidence


MSR-08MSR-07MSR-06

MSR-04

MSR-05

PD1-08

PD1-07

PD1-06

PD1-04

PD2-05

PD2-04

PD2-03

PD4-02

PD4-03

PD3-05PD3-06

PD3-03

PD1-05

PD2-06

PD3-04

SM

PT-

09

SM

PT-

06

SM

PT-

07

SM

PT-01

SM

PT-

08

SMPT-11

SMPT-12

SMPT-10

SM

PT-

04

SM

PT-

05

SM

PT-03

SM

PT-02

U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-2_Sediment_Sample_Location.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012

300 0 300


N

LEGEND

Sediment

Strip Mine Pit Transect

Site Boundary

Water Bodies




Hydrography

Roads

PD4

MSR Mid Site RavinePD5 Pond 5

Pond 4

PD3 Pond 3PD2 Pond 2PD1 Pond 1

SMPT Strip Mine Pit Transect

NOTE:

Strip Mine Pit sediment sample locations will selectedin the field based on visual inspection of core samples(8 sediment sample locations with up to 3 intervalsper location are planned).


SEDIMENTSAMPLE LOCATION MAP

Figure 3-2

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2


Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack Creek

Intermitte

nt Drainage

FormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence



FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




MW-05

MW-04

MW-03

MW-02

MW-01

RW-01

MW-06MW-04D

B-06B-05

B-04

B-03B-02B-01MW-08

MW-10

MW-09

MW-07

Pond 1

Figure 3-3

BORING AND MONITORING WELLLOCATION MAP


U:\TulsaFuels\ARC\ArcDocs\2011\Fig3-3_Boring_Monitoring_Wells.mxd sos Jan 3, 2012

LEGEND

RD Boring

RD Monitoring Well

RI Monitoring Well

Residential Well

Site Boundary

Water Bodies




Hydrography

Roads

300 0 300


N

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish

1 Notice to Proceed 0 days Fri 9/30/11 Fri 9/30/11

2 2.0 Project Planning and Support 567 days? Fri 9/30/11 Mon 12/2/13

3 2.1 Project Planning 92 days Fri 9/30/11 Mon 2/6/12

4 2.1.1 Attend Scoping Meeting 1 day Thu 10/27/11 Thu 10/27/11

5 2.1.2 Conduct Site Visit 1 day Thu 10/27/11 Thu 10/27/11

6 2.1.3 Evaluate Existing Information 42 days Fri 9/30/11 Mon 11/28/11

7 2.1.4 Off-Site Access Agreements 1 day Wed 10/19/11 Wed 10/19/11

8 2.1.5 Work Plan 72 days Thu 10/27/11 Mon 2/6/12

9 Draft 32 edays Thu 10/27/11 Mon 11/28/11

10 Review 21 edays Mon 11/28/11 Mon 12/19/11

11 Conference Call on WP and SAP 1 day Fri 1/20/12 Fri 1/20/12

12 Final 11 days Mon 1/23/12 Mon 2/6/12

13 2.2 Prepare Site Specific Plans 113 days? Thu 10/27/11 Tue 4/3/12

14 2.2.1 Site Management Plan 41 days? Mon 2/6/12 Tue 4/3/12

15 Draft 30 edays? Mon 2/6/12 Wed 3/7/12

16 Review 12 edays Wed 3/7/12 Mon 3/19/12

17 Final 15 edays Mon 3/19/12 Tue 4/3/12

18 2.2.2 HASP 57 days? Thu 10/27/11 Mon 1/16/12

19 Draft 43 edays? Thu 10/27/11 Fri 12/9/11

20 Review 21 edays? Fri 12/9/11 Fri 12/30/11

21 Final 17 edays? Fri 12/30/11 Mon 1/16/12

22 2.2.3 SAP 72 days? Thu 10/27/11 Mon 2/6/12

23 Draft 43 edays? Thu 10/27/11 Fri 12/9/11

24 Review 34 edays Fri 12/9/11 Thu 1/12/12

25 Final 25 edays Thu 1/12/12 Mon 2/6/12

26 2.3 Project Management 566 days Mon 10/3/11 Mon 12/2/13

27 2.3.1 Monthly Progress Reports 546 days Mon 10/10/11 Mon 11/11/13

54 2.3.2 Meetings / Routine Communication 566 days Mon 10/3/11 Mon 12/2/13

169 2.3.3 Contract Closeout 2 days Mon 11/25/13 Tue 11/26/13

170 2.4 Subcontractor Procurement/Support Activities 29 edays Mon 2/6/12 Tue 3/6/12

171 3.0 Community Involvement 480 days Mon 1/2/12 Fri 11/1/13

172 3.2 Prepare Fact Sheet 466 days Mon 1/2/12 Mon 10/14/13

175 3.2 Public Meeting Availability & Support 458 days Wed 2/1/12 Fri 11/1/13

178 4.0 Data Acquisition 371 days? Mon 9/12/11 Mon 2/11/13

179 4.2 Field Investigation 371 days? Mon 9/12/11 Mon 2/11/13

180 4.2.1 Site Reconnaissance 1 day Wed 2/29/12 Wed 2/29/12

181 4.2.2 Geological Investigations 17 days Thu 3/1/12 Fri 3/23/12

182 4.2.3 Hydrogeologic Investigation - Groundwater 246 days Mon 3/5/12 Mon 2/11/13

183 Borings & Well Installation 12 days Mon 3/5/12 Tue 3/20/12

184 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations and Quarterly Sampling 241 days Mon 3/12/12 Mon 2/11/13

185 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations and Quarterly Sampling 3 days Mon 3/12/12 Wed 3/14/12

186 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations 2 1 day Wed 4/11/12 Wed 4/11/12




190 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations 6 1 day Fri 8/10/12 Fri 8/10/12



193 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations 9 1 day Mon 11/12/12 Mon 11/12/12


195 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations 11 1 day Fri 1/11/13 Fri 1/11/13

196 Groundwater - Monthly Elevations 12 1 day Mon 2/11/13 Mon 2/11/13

197 4.2.4 Hydrogeologic Investigation - Surface Water 241 days Mon 3/12/12 Mon 2/11/13

198 Surface Water Elevation 241 days Mon 3/12/12 Mon 2/11/13

211 Surface Water Sampling 1 day Wed 3/21/12 Wed 3/21/12

212 4.2.5 Waste Investigation 1 day? Fri 3/9/12 Fri 3/9/12

213 4.2.6 Ecological Investigation 152 days Mon 9/12/11 Tue 4/10/12

214 Wildlife Observations 2 days Mon 4/9/12 Tue 4/10/12

215 American Burying Beetle Survey 6 days Mon 9/12/11 Mon 9/19/11

216 4.2.7 IDW Disposal 1 day Fri 3/9/12 Fri 3/9/12

217 5.0 Sample Analysis 217 days Wed 3/14/12 Fri 1/11/13

218 5.1 SEL-type Laboratory Analysis 217 days Wed 3/14/12 Fri 1/11/13

219 Field Activities 31 edays Fri 3/23/12 Mon 4/23/12

220 GW 1 30 edays Wed 3/14/12 Fri 4/13/12

221 GW 2 30 edays Wed 6/13/12 Fri 7/13/12

222 GW 3 30 edays Wed 9/12/12 Fri 10/12/12

223 GW 4 30 edays Wed 12/12/12 Fri 1/11/13

224 6.0 Analytical Support and Data Validation 198 days Mon 4/16/12 Wed 1/16/13

225 6.2 Data Validation 198 days Mon 4/16/12 Wed 1/16/13

226 Field Activities 17 days Tue 4/24/12 Wed 5/16/12

227 GW 1 3 days Mon 4/16/12 Wed 4/18/12

228 GW 2 3 days Mon 7/16/12 Wed 7/18/12

229 GW 3 3 days Mon 10/15/12 Wed 10/17/12

230 GW 4 3 days Mon 1/14/13 Wed 1/16/13

231 7.0 Data Evaluation 238 days Mon 3/26/12 Wed 2/20/13

232 7.1 Data Usability Evaluation and Field QA/QC 15 days Mon 3/26/12 Fri 4/13/12

9/304 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 4 111825 1 8 152229 5 121926 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8 152229 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 3 101724 3 10172431 7 142128 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8

Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov D2012 2013

Task Milestone Summary Review

Figure 4-1Preliminary Schedule


Page 1

Project: Figure 4-1 Schedule revised 0Date: Wed 2/8/12

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish

233 7.2 & 7.3 Data Evaluation and Data Evaluation Reports 217 days Mon 4/23/12 Wed 2/20/13

234 Data Evaluation Report - Draft 10 edays Mon 4/23/12 Thu 5/3/12

235 ODEQ Review of Phase 15 edays Thu 5/3/12 Fri 5/18/12

236 Data Evaluation Report - Final 17 edays Fri 5/18/12 Mon 6/4/12

237 Groundwater Data Evaluation Report - Draft 10 edays Fri 1/11/13 Mon 1/21/13

238 ODEQ Review of Phase 15 edays Mon 1/21/13 Tue 2/5/13

239 Groundwater Data Evaluation Report - Final 15 edays Tue 2/5/13 Wed 2/20/13

240 8.0 Treatability Study/Pilot Test 142 days Mon 2/6/12 Wed 8/22/12

241 8.2 Work Plan 45 days Mon 2/6/12 Mon 4/9/12

242 8.2.1 Draft Work Plan 30 edays Mon 2/6/12 Wed 3/7/12

243 8.2.2 ODEQ Review 21 edays Wed 3/7/12 Wed 3/28/12

244 8.2.3 Final Work Plan 12 edays Wed 3/28/12 Mon 4/9/12

245 8.3 Bench Test 14 days Tue 4/10/12 Fri 4/27/12

246 8.5 Field Test 15 days Mon 4/30/12 Fri 5/18/12

247 8.6 Treatability Study Report 68 days Fri 5/18/12 Wed 8/22/12

248 8.6.1 Draft Report 60 edays Fri 5/18/12 Tue 7/17/12

249 8.6.2 ODEQ Review 21 edays Tue 7/17/12 Tue 8/7/12

250 8.6.3 Final Report 15 edays Tue 8/7/12 Wed 8/22/12

251 9.0 Preliminary Design 96 days Wed 8/22/12 Thu 1/3/13

252 9.1 Preliminary Design/Design Criteria Report 44 edays Wed 8/22/12 Fri 10/5/12

253 ODEQ Review 21 edays Fri 10/5/12 Fri 10/26/12

254 9.1.5 Basis of Design Report 44 edays Wed 8/22/12 Fri 10/5/12


256 9.1 - 9.2 Prelminary Plans and Specifications 61 edays Wed 8/22/12 Mon 10/22/12

257 ODEQ Review 30 edays Mon 10/22/12 Wed 11/21/12

258 9.4 VE Screening Report 61 edays Wed 8/22/12 Mon 10/22/12

259 ODEQ Review 21 edays Mon 10/22/12 Mon 11/12/12

260 9.6 Design Review and Breifing 7 edays Mon 11/12/12 Mon 11/19/12

261 9.5 Respond to Design Review Comments 30 edays Mon 11/19/12 Wed 12/19/12

262 ODEQ Review 15 edays Wed 12/19/12 Thu 1/3/13

263 10.0 Equipment/Services/Utilities 49 days Thu 1/3/13 Wed 3/13/13

264 10.1 List of Long-Lead Equipment, Services, and/or Utilities 29 edays Thu 1/3/13 Fri 2/1/13

265 ODEQ Review 10 edays Fri 2/1/13 Mon 2/11/13

266 10.2 Plans/Specs for Long-Lead Procurement Items 15 edays Mon 2/11/13 Tue 2/26/13

267 ODEQ Review 15 edays Tue 2/26/13 Wed 3/13/13

268 11.0 Intermediate Design 69 days Thu 1/3/13 Wed 4/10/13

269 11.1-11.5 &11.8 Intermediation Plans and Specs 29 edays Thu 1/3/13 Fri 2/1/13


271 11.6 Intermediate Design Review and Briefing 17 edays Fri 2/22/13 Mon 3/11/13

272 11.9 Response to Design Review Comments 15 edays Mon 3/11/13 Tue 3/26/13

273 ODEQ Review 15 edays Tue 3/26/13 Wed 4/10/13

274 12.0 Prefinal/Final Design 148 days Wed 4/10/13 Mon 11/4/13

275 12.1-12.4, 12.8-12.12 Prefinal Plans and Specs 30 edays Wed 4/10/13 Fri 5/10/13


277 12.6 Prefinal/Final Design Review and Briefing 14 edays Fri 5/31/13 Fri 6/14/13

278 Respond to Comments 14 edays Fri 6/14/13 Fri 6/28/13

279 ODEQ Review 17 edays Fri 6/28/13 Mon 7/15/13

280 12.5 100 Percent Design 30 edays Mon 7/15/13 Wed 8/14/13

281 12.7 RA Contract Documents 58 days Wed 8/14/13 Mon 11/4/13

282 Draft 30 edays Wed 8/14/13 Fri 9/13/13


284 Final 31 edays Fri 10/4/13 Mon 11/4/13

285 13.0 Post RD Support 30 edays Mon 11/4/13 Wed 12/4/13

286 14.0 Contract Closeout 30 edays Mon 11/4/13 Wed 12/4/13

4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 4 111825 1 8 152229 5 121926 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8 152229 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 2 9 162330 6 132027 3 101724 3 10172431 7 142128 5 121926 2 9 162330 7 142128 4 111825 1 8 152229 6 132027 3 101724 1 8Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov D

2012 2013

Task Milestone Summary Review

Figure 4-1Preliminary Schedule


Page 2

Project: Figure 4-1 Schedule revised 0Date: Wed 2/8/12

Sara Downard

Project Manager

Sharon Shelton

QC Director

Tracy Cooley, R.G.

Project Team

Organizational Chart

Project Engineer

Brian Weis

Field Site Manager / Geologist

David Barker

Project Chemist

Shauna Lawrence

Environmental Sampling

Jason Kolb

Brett Hamlin

CADD Technician

Daniel Nyberg

GIS

Siripon “Oui” Sheldon

Figure 5-1

Organizational Chart

Tulsa Fuel and Manufacturing

Collinsville, Oklahoma

Engineering Manager

Keith Connor, P.E.

Health & Safety

Manager

Eric Wenger, CIH

USEPA Region 6

Michael Torres State Environmental

Laboratory

APPENDIX A

Select Figures from RI Report

MW-01

PZ-01

PZ-02PZ-03

PZ-04

PZ-06

PZ-05

PZ-08PZ-07MW-03

PZ-11PZ-10MW-05

PZ-09MW-04

MW-04DMW-06

MW-02

SP-57 SP-58 SP-59

SP-56

SP-55

SP-54

SP-60

A'B'

B

ABM

EC-02

SP-21SP-19

SP-53SP-50

SP-51SP-52

SP-49SP-48SP-45

SP-41SP-44

SP-38SP-37SP-36

SP-34

SP-30SP-33

SP-28SP-27

SP-26SP-25

SP-24SP-23SP-18

SP-16

SP-08SP-13SP-14

TR-12

TR-16TR-17

TR-08TR-09TR-13TR-19

TR-11

TR-02TR-05

TR-01

TR-15

TR-04

TR-14TR-18

TR-20

TR-10TR-21

TR-03

TR-06

TR-07

SP-12SP-15


SP-02

SP-47

SP-40

SP-46

SP-42SP-43

SP-35

SP-39SP-31SP-32

SP-29

SP-22SP-20SP-17

SP-09SP-10SP-11

SP-03SP-01

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2



Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack CreekFormerSmelter

OperationsArea

FormerResidence


Eastern Wetlands


FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




EC-01

TFM

U\Tu

lsa F

uels\

ARC\

ArcD

ocs\R

I_Rep

ort\Fi

g3-2_

Geolo

gic_C

ross_

Secti

ons_

11x1

7.mxd

1:36

00 k

me/ss

l ss

mrb 0

4/05/0

7

Pond 1

Figure 2-2

LEGENDCross-SectionSite BoundaryWater BodiesCollinsville SmelterHydrographySurfaceSurface/SubsurfaceTrenching RoadsFormer Smelter Oper. AreaWaste Materials EncounteredEcological / Vegetation TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING

Collinsville, OK

Geological Cross-Section Lines

Figure 3-2The Access Road / Drivewayis composed of waste materials.

NOTE:

NORTH0 150 300

Feet

PZ-02657.85

PZ-08641.78

665

660

655

650

645

665

660

655

650 645

640

640

PZ-10644.86

PZ-09645.88

PZ-11649.87

PZ-07658.02

PZ-06664.83

PZ-05651.93

PZ-04644.36

PZ-01667.64

PZ-03639.95

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2



Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit

Blackjack CreekFormerSmelterOperationsArea

FormerResidence


Eastern Wetlands


FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




U\Tu

lsa F

uels\

ARC\

ArcD

ocs\R

I Rep

ort\F

inal\F

ig3-3_

PotS

urfMa

p_Te

mpPZ

s_08

3105

_11x

17.m

xd km

e/ssl

ss 07

/20/20

07 1

:3600

Pond 1


POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAPTEMPORARY PIEZOMETERS

AUGUST 31, 2005

Figure 3-3

NORTH 0 150 300Feet

LEGENDFormer Smelter Oper. AreaSite BoundaryGroundwater ContoursCollinsville SmelterWater BodiesHydrographyTemporary Piezometer WetlandsWaste Materials Encountered

650

RoadGroundwater Flow Direction

670

670

665

660

655

650

665

660

655

650


Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2



Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit


OperationsArea

FormerResidence


Eastern Wetlands


FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




MW-05646.39

MW-04647.69

MW-03646.47

MW-02650.63

MW-01672.89

RW-01

U\Tu

lsa Fu

els\A

RC\A

rcDoc

s\RIR

eport

\Fina

l\Fig3

-4_Po

tSurf

Map_

MWs_

0508

06_1

1x17

.mxd

mrb/

kme/s

sl ss

07/20

/2007

1:36

00

Pond 1

NORTH TULSA FUEL AND MANUFACTURING Collinsville, OK

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAPMONITORING WELLS

MAY 8, 2006

Figure 3-4

LEGENDSite BoundaryWater BodiesCollinsville SmelterHydrographyWetlandsGroundwater ContoursFormer Smelter Oper. AreaWaste Materials EncounteredMonitoring WellResidental Well

650

Groundwater Flow Direction0 310155

FeetRoad

645

650

655

660

665

650

655

660

665

645

Pond 4

Pond 3

Pond 2



Pond 5

Strip Mine Pit


OperationsArea

FormerResidence


Eastern Wetlands


FaithAssemblyChurch

South 12th Street




MW-05

MW-04

MW-03

MW-02

MW-01

RW-01

645.91

648.17

643.94

642.29

640.49

665.54

MW-06MW-04D

U\Tu

lsa Fu

els\A

RC\A

rcDoc

s\RI R

eport

\Fina

l\Fig3

-5_Ph

II_Sx

Loca

tions

_11x

17.m

xd m

rb/km

e/ssl

ss 0

7/20/2

007

1:360

0

Pond 1

NORTH0 150 300

FeetGroundwater Flow Direction

650

Road

Figure 3-5POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP

MONITORING WELLS SEPTEMBER 18, 2006


Site BoundaryWater BodiesCollinsville SmelterHydrographyWetlandsFormer Smelter Oper. AreaWaste Materials EncounteredGroundwater ContoursProposed Monitoring WellMonitoring WellResidental Well

LEGEND

APPENDIX B

American Burying Beetle Survey Report

1

Shelton, Sharon

From: Steve Votaw [[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:36 AMTo: Shelton, SharonSubject: RE: TFIM, Collinsville, OK

Sharon, Thank you. I forwarded this approval to Brian Roh earlier this week. This is the official and only response we will receive. The survey was approved and the project cleared. Hopefully the site will be reclaimed by May 20, 2012. If not please let me know. Please retain for your records. Thank you ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the following American burying beetle (ABB) survey report: Tulsa County, Oklahoma regarding the Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project for the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality ending September 19, 2011. This American burying beetle (ABB) survey report indicates that no ABBs were captured at the proposed project site. This survey is valid until May 20, 2012. Since the survey results are negative, and we have reviewed and approved the survey report, no further section 7 consultation with the Service concerning the ABB is required. This response does not pertain to any other federally‐listed species that may be impacted by the proposed project. This notice needs to be forwarded to the appropriate project proponent, and appropriate federal, state, or tribal agency for their records. As the permittee and hired consultant this is your responsibility. Further, I may not have the contact information for the project proponents, or the appropriate state, federal, or tribal agency. Our comments are submitted in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). This correspondence is valid for one year from the above date. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. Christopher D. Tanner Fish & Wildlife Biologist U.S.Fish and Wildlife Services Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office 9014 E. 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74129 Phone: (918) 382‐4517 Fax: (918) 581‐7467 Email: [email protected] ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Steve Votaw President Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc.

2

P.O. Box 335 Vinita, OK 74301 918‐272‐7656 918.256.6131 (f) www.eagle‐env.com ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Shelton, Sharon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:13 AM To: 'Steve Votaw' Subject: RE: TFIM, Collinsville, OK Hi Steve ‐ I'll get this submitted into our accounting for payment. I was speaking with Sara Downard yesterday at DEQ. She told me that she had been talking with FWS and that they indicated the ABB survey was approved. Just curious, have they sent an approval letter your way? Or something giving the green light to do the site work? Sharon Shelton Associate Chemist & Project Manager, Environmental Group Burns & McDonnell Direct: 816‐822‐3168 Main: 816‐333‐9400 Fax: 816‐822‐3463 [email protected] www.burnsmcd.com Proud recipient of PSMJ's Premier Award for Client Satisfaction This e‐mail and any attachments are solely for the use of the addressed recipients and may contain privileged client communication or privileged work product. If you are not the intended recipient, and receive this communication, please contact the sender by phone at 816‐333‐9400 and delete and purge this e‐mail from your e‐mail system and destroy any other electronic or printed copies. Thank you for your cooperation. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Steve Votaw [mailto:steve@eagle‐env.com] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 10:26 AM To: Shelton, Sharon Subject: TFIM, Collinsville, OK Dear Ms. Shelton: Attached is our invoice for the captiond project for your review and approval. We only included one additional trap night cost instead of two. Let mel know if you have any questions. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Steve Votaw Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc.

AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE REPORT

Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Prepared for:

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality

Prepared by:

Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc.

P.O. Box 335 P.O. Box 5446 Vinita, Oklahoma 74301 Fort Smith, Arkansas 72913 918-272-7656 918-697-3936

October 2011

AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE SURVEY

Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2.0 General Site Description ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 Sampling Methodology .......................................................................................... 1 4.0 Survey Findings ...................................................................................................... 3 5.0 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 5 6.0 References ............................................................................................................... 6 List of Figures Figure 1 General Location Map 2 Figure 2 Trap Location Map 4 List of Appendices Appendix A Representative Photographs Appendix B Survey Data Forms Appendix C Meteorological Data



1


Proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project

Tulsa County, Oklahoma

1.0 Introduction The subject survey effort was conducted to identify the presence or absence of American Burying Beetles (Nicrophorus americanus) (ABB) associated with the proposed Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Project in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. The project survey area included approximately 160 acres. Trapping began the night of September 12, 2011 and continued until September 19, 2011 during which no ABB’s were captured. One trap location was deployed and maintained for 8 nights. Trap location 1 was located in Section 32, Township 22 North, Range 14 East. The general project location is shown on Figure 1. The ABB has been a federally listed endangered species since 1989 and is also recognized as endangered at the State level. Based on the potential for impact to individuals of ABB, these surveys were performed in compliance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1539, et seq.) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regulations (50 C.F.R. 17.22) under Endangered Species permit number TE043399-0.

2.0 General Site Description The survey corridor is located within the undulating landscape of the North Cross Timbers Ecoregion of Oklahoma (Woods, et.al, 2004). The majority of the lands within this ecoregion are associated low rolling hills that are covered by a mixture of rangeland, pastureland, and woodland. The trap was placed within a woodland. Dominant vegetation consisted of Indian grass, hackberry, American elm, cottonwood, little bluestem, big bluestem, and American cherry.

3.0 Sampling Methodology The ABB is large (1-1.5 inches) and has a shiny black appearance with four orange-red spots on the wing covers (elytra).A large red spot on the pronotum of the beetle is indicative of the species. The habitat requirements for this beetle are



2



3

not fully known; however, the ABB is considered a habitat generalist and is known to occupy a diverse range of habitats. Habitats associated with the ABB include open grasslands, forests, as well as transitional areas. The beetle is a carrion feeder and utilizes small vertebrate carcasses for food and reproductive purposes. The ABB occurs in a variety of habitat types and will exploit virtually any possibilities where suitable forage and soil conditions may be found. One trap location was selected to ensure appropriate survey coverage of the anticipated area of disturbance. The trapping method for the ABB survey was performed according to the American Burying Beetle Rangewide Survey Guidance dated April 20, 2011. The trap location included one five gallon bucket pitfall trap with a diameter of 11.2 inches. Bait consisted of a whole extra large rat carcass with hair intact and placed on 3 to 4 inches of soil. The trap was covered with a wire mesh and protective shield.

According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a minimum of 5 successive trap-nights are required to establish a sampling effort. Temperatures cannot fall below 60°F, rainfall totals cannot exceed 0.5 inches, and wind speed cannot exceed 10 miles per hour for greater than 20% of the trap night between 9 pm and 4 am. Failure to meet such specified trapping effort criteria would result in an additional trap night or trap nights. Meteorological data for this ABB survey effort was obtained from the Weather Underground. The trap location is shown on Figure 2.

4.0 Survey Findings No American Burying Beetles were captured during the survey effort. Several species of beetles including two species of Nicrophorus, crickets (Gryllidae), arachnids, isopods, and various other insects and arthropods were collected. Atmospheric conditions during the ABB survey were fair with normal temperatures and wind velocities ranging from calm to moderate (0 to less than 10 mph). Nighttime temperatures were recorded in the low 50’s to mid 70’s (°F) while daytime highs reached the low 80’s to 100’s (°F). Coordination with the USFWS in Tulsa confirmed their acceptance of the survey as valid despite the inclement weather.

Representative photographs of the trap locations are provided in Appendix A. The field survey data forms and survey summary sheet are found in Appendix B. Meteorological data is provided in Appendix C.



4



5

5.0 Conclusion The subject survey was performed in an effort to identify the presence of American Burying Beetles at or near the proposed construction area. One trap location was placed near the proposed construction area to ensure adequate coverage and maintained for 8 trap nights. The trapping of 1 N. Tomentosus and 4 N. Marginatus along with multiple other insects attracted to carrion indicates trapping efforts and techniques were adequate and functional. Meteorological conditions during the survey were favorable for ABB activity.



6

6.0 References

Creighton, J.C., M.V. Lomolino, and G.D. Schnell, Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma. Survey methods for the American Burying Beetle, Nicrophorus americanus, in Oklahoma and Arkansas. May 1993.

United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil

Survey Staff. Web Soil Survey for Tulsa County, OK. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed October, 2011.

USGS. 7.5-Minute Topographic Map United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. American Burying Beetle Nicrophorus

americanus Rangewide Survey Guidance. 8 pages. Weather Underground. http://www.wunderground.com/ Woods, et al 2004. Oklahoma (color poster with map, Ecoregions of descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale1:1,000,000).

Appendix A

Representative Photographs

American Burying Beetle Survey Eagle Environmental Consulting, Inc. Tulsa County, Oklahoma October 2011

South View

Northeast View

Appendix B

Survey Data Forms

AMERICAN BURYING BEETLE DATA COLLECTION FORM

Project Name Tulsa Fuels Reclamation Time: 0915 Date: 9/12/2011 Transect# 1

Survey Night 1

Survey Company Eagle Environmental Surveyor Steve Votaw

Project Proponent ODEQ

State: Oklahoma County: Tulsa Legal Description: S32, T22N, R14E General Location: Collinsville

Decimal Degrees 36.3481, -95.8462 Coord. System: NAD 83

Vegetation Type: Pasture Primary Soil Type: Dennis Radley Complex, silt loam Temp: Min: 54 Max: 96 Rain> 0.5 inches? Yes or No Additional survey nights required because of rain? Yes or No

Trap No americanus orbicollis tomentosus pustulatus marginatus carolinus sayi Other carrion beetles

1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Number of disturbed traps and/or bait (D): 0

Additional Survey night(s) required because of disturbance? Yes or No

ABB Male Female Old New Age Unknown

Recapture Newly Marked

Tag # Death Pronotum Width

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Comments: Single 5 Gallon Trap. Survey considered valid by Anita Barstow, Tulsa , Ecological Services Field Office.



Survey Night 2







1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 3







1.U D 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 4







1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 5







1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 6







1.U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 7







1.U D 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0




Survey Night 8







1.U D 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

2. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

8. U D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Totals 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0






0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Appendix C

Meteorological Data

History for KOKCOLLI2Sand Ridge Airpark, Collinsville, OK — Current Conditions

Daily Summary for September 12, 2011

Page 1 of 7Weather Station History : Weather Underground

10/7/2011http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KOKCOLLI2&...

Tabular Data for September 12, 2011

Time Temp. Heat Index Dew Point Pressure Wind Wind Speed Wind Gust Humidity Rainfall Rate (Hourly)

00:00 61.4 °F - 55.2 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

00:10 61.4 °F - 54.8 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in

00:20 61.1 °F - 54.9 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

00:30 60.9 °F - 55.4 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 82% 0.00in

00:40 61.0 °F - 55.1 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

00:50 60.6 °F - 54.7 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

Comma Delimited File




01:00 60.5 °F - 55.0 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 82% 0.00in

01:10 60.3 °F - 54.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 82% 0.00in

01:20 59.5 °F - 54.3 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 83% 0.00in

01:30 59.0 °F - 54.2 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 84% 0.00in

01:40 58.7 °F - 54.2 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 85% 0.00in

01:50 59.0 °F - 54.5 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 85% 0.00in

02:00 58.9 °F - 54.7 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

02:10 59.0 °F - 54.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

02:20 59.0 °F - 54.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

02:30 58.5 °F - 54.0 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 85% 0.00in

02:40 58.0 °F - 53.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

02:50 57.3 °F - 53.1 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

03:00 56.9 °F - 53.1 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 87% 0.00in

03:10 56.8 °F - 53.3 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 88% 0.00in

03:20 56.6 °F - 53.4 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

03:30 56.6 °F - 53.4 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

03:40 56.1 °F - 52.6 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 88% 0.00in

03:50 56.1 °F - 53.8 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

04:00 56.3 °F - 53.4 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

04:10 55.9 °F - 53.0 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

04:20 55.8 °F - 52.9 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

04:30 55.5 °F - 52.6 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

04:40 55.4 °F - 52.5 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

04:50 55.4 °F - 52.8 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

05:00 55.0 °F - 52.1 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

05:10 55.3 °F - 52.7 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

05:20 54.9 °F - 52.3 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

05:30 54.1 °F - 51.2 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

05:40 54.0 °F - 51.4 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

05:50 53.8 °F - 51.2 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

06:00 53.9 °F - 51.3 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

06:10 54.3 °F - 52.0 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

06:20 54.2 °F - 51.9 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in





0+ :, 0 54.4 - . / 52.1 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

0+ :2 0 54.3 - . / 52.0 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

0+ :3 0 54.1 - . / 51.8 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

07:00 53.7 - . / 51.4 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

07:10 53.9 - . / 51.6 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

07:20 53.6 - . / 51.3 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

07:, 0 54.0 - . / 52.0 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 0 , 1 0.00in

07:2 0 55.0 - . / 53.0 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 0 , 1 0.00in

07:3 0 56.2 - . / 54.2 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 , 1 0.00in

04 :00 57.5 - . / 55.2 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

04 :10 59.0 - . / 56.4 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 11 0.00in

04 :20 61.3 - . / 57.7 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 4 4 1 0.00in

04 :, 0 64.0 - . / 59.1 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 4 2 1 0.00in

04 :2 0 67.0 - . / 59.9 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 74 1 0.00in

04 :3 0 68.7 - . / 60.1 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 72 1 0.00in

00 :00 70.7 - . / 59.6 - . 30.09in S 5 1.0mph 1.0mph + 4 1 0.00in

00 :10 72.2 - . / 59.8 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph + 3 1 0.00in

00 :20 73.5 - . / 59.7 - . 30.09in SS 5 1.0mph 1.0mph + 21 0.00in

00 :, 0 74.4 - . / 59.6 - . 30.09in South 1.0mph 1.0mph + 01 0.00in

00 :2 0 75.8 - . / 60.0 - . 30.09in South 1.0mph 1.0mph 3 4 1 0.00in

00 :3 0 77.3 - . / 60.4 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 3 + 1 0.00in

10:00 78.7 - . / 61.2 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 3 3 1 0.00in

10:10 79.8 - . / 60.6 - . 30.09in SSW 1.0mph 7.0mph 3 21 0.00in

10:20 80.9 - . 81.6 - . 60.5 - . 30.08in South 4.0mph 4.0mph 3 01 0.00in

10:, 0 81.0 - . 81.7 - . 60.6 - . 30.08in South 5.0mph 5.0mph 3 01 0.00in

10:2 0 81.8 - . 82.4 - . 60.8 - . 30.08in SSW 4.0mph 8.0mph 2 0 1 0.00in

10:3 0 82.4 - . 83.0 - . 61.3 - . 30.08in South 5.0mph 8.0mph 2 0 1 0.00in

11:00 83.4 - . 84.0 - . 61.7 - . 30.08in SS 5 3.0mph 3.0mph 2 4 1 0.00in

11:10 84.7 - . 84.7 - . 60.4 - . 30.08in South 4.0mph 4.0mph 2 2 1 0.00in

11:20 84.9 - . 84.8 - . 59.9 - . 30.07in South 6.0mph 6.0mph 2 , 1 0.00in

11:, 0 85.0 - . 84.5 - . 58.7 - . 30.07in SSW 6.0mph 8.0mph 2 11 0.00in

11:2 0 85.6 - . 85.4 - . 59.9 - . 30.07in SW 6.0mph 6.0mph 2 21 0.00in

11:3 0 86.2 - . 85.9 - . 59.7 - . 30.06in SSW 5.0mph 5.0mph 2 11 0.00in

Comma Delimited . ile




12:00 87.0 - . 86.6 - . 59.8 - . 30.06in SSW 5.0mph 7.0mph 2 01 0.00in

12:10 87.1 - . 86.5 - . 59.1 - . 30.06in SW 6.0mph 6.0mph , 0 1 0.00in

12:20 87.6 - . 87.1 - . 59.6 - . 30.05in SW 5.0mph 5.0mph , 0 1 0.00in

12:, 0 87.8 - . 87.4 - . 59.8 - . 30.04in South 6.0mph 6.0mph , 0 1 0.00in

12:2 0 88.6 - . 88.2 - . 59.7 - . 30.04in SW 5.0mph 8.0mph , 4 1 0.00in

12:3 0 88.4 - . 87.6 - . 58.8 - . 30.04in South 5.0mph 8.0mph , 71 0.00in

1, :00 89.2 - . 88.7 - . 59.5 - . 30.03in S 5 5.0mph 7.0mph , 71 0.00in

1, :10 89.1 - . 88.8 - . 60.2 - . 30.03in WSW 4.0mph 4.0mph , 4 1 0.00in

1, :20 90.4 - . 90.0 - . 59.8 - . 30.02in SSW 4.0mph 5.0mph , + 1 0.00in

1, :, 0 90.4 - . 90.0 - . 59.8 - . 30.02in SSW 5.0mph 10.0mph , + 1 0.00in

1, :2 0 90.8 - . 90.8 - . 60.9 - . 30.01in South 5.0mph 5.0mph , 71 0.00in

1, :3 0 90.6 - . 90.2 - . 60.0 - . 30.01in SS 5 4.0mph 4.0mph , + 1 0.00in

12 :00 91.5 - . 91.2 - . 60.0 - . 30.00in South 2.0mph 5.0mph , 3 1 0.00in

12 :10 91.7 - . 90.8 - . 58.5 - . 30.00in SSW 5.0mph 8.0mph , , 1 0.00in

12 :20 92.7 - . 91.9 - . 58.5 - . 29.99in West 5.0mph 5.0mph , 21 0.00in

12 :, 0 92.3 - . 91.6 - . 59.0 - . 29.98in SSW 5.0mph 6.0mph , , 1 0.00in

12 :2 0 93.1 - . 92.4 - . 58.9 - . 29.98in WSW 4.0mph 4.0mph , 21 0.00in

12 :3 0 93.5 - . 93.0 - . 59.2 - . 29.97in SSW 4.0mph 4.0mph , 21 0.00in

13 :00 93.1 - . 92.4 - . 58.9 - . 29.97in SS 5 4.0mph 4.0mph , 21 0.00in

13 :10 93.4 - . 92.8 - . 59.1 - . 29.96in SW 3.0mph 4.0mph , 21 0.00in

13 :20 94.1 - . 93.9 - . 59.7 - . 29.95in South 4.0mph 4.0mph , 21 0.00in

13 :, 0 94.3 - . 94.1 - . 59.9 - . 29.95in S 5 2.0mph 7.0mph , 21 0.00in

13 :2 0 94.2 - . 93.6 - . 58.9 - . 29.94in SS 5 6.0mph 6.0mph , 11 0.00in

13 :3 0 95.0 - . 94.0 - . 57.8 - . 29.93in South 4.0mph 4.0mph 20 1 0.00in

1+ :00 94.8 - . 94.1 - . 58.5 - . 29.93in WSW 3.0mph 10.0mph , 01 0.00in

1+ :10 94.9 - . 94.6 - . 59.5 - . 29.92in South 5.0mph 5.0mph , 11 0.00in

1+ :20 94.9 - . 93.9 - . 57.7 - . 29.92in South 6.0mph 8.0mph 20 1 0.00in

1+ :, 0 95.4 - . 94.6 - . 58.1 - . 29.92in SSW 6.0mph 6.0mph 20 1 0.00in

1+ :2 0 95.9 - . 95.3 - . 58.5 - . 29.91in South 3.0mph 3.0mph 20 1 0.00in

1+ :3 0 95.1 - . 94.2 - . 57.8 - . 29.91in 5 S 5 6.0mph 10.0mph 20 1 0.00in

17:00 95.4 - . 94.6 - . 58.1 - . 29.91in SSW 6.0mph 6.0mph 20 1 0.00in

17:10 95.8 - . 94.8 - . 57.5 - . 29.91in South 5.0mph 6.0mph 24 1 0.00in

17:20 95.5 - . 94.8 - . 58.2 - . 29.90in S 5 4.0mph 9.0mph 20 1 0.00in


Page , of 7Weather Station History : Weather Underground



17:30 95.1 - . 94.2 - . 57.8 - . 29.90in S / 7.0mph 7.0mph 20 1 0.00in

17:40 95.5 - . 94.8 - . 58.2 - . 29.90in SS / 4.0mph 4.0mph 20 1 0.00in

17:2 0 95.2 - . 94.3 - . 57.9 - . 29.90in SS / 6.0mph 6.0mph 20 1 0.00in

13 :00 95.0 - . 93.7 - . 56.8 - . 29.90in S / 5.0mph 5.0mph 23 1 0.00in

13 :10 95.0 - . 94.0 - . 57.8 - . 29.89in SS / 4.0mph 4.0mph 20 1 0.00in

13 :20 94.6 - . 93.5 - . 57.4 - . 29.89in SS / 5.0mph 7.0mph 20 1 0.00in

13 :30 94.3 - . 93.1 - . 57.2 - . 29.89in SS / 4.0mph 13.0mph 20 1 0.00in

13 :2 0 93.3 - . 92.0 - . 57.2 - . 29.89in S / 5.0mph 5.0mph 301 0.00in

10 :10 89.8 - . 88.9 - . 58.5 - . 29.89in / S / 4.0mph 4.0mph 32 1 0.00in

10 :20 88.0 - . 87.1 - . 58.5 - . 29.89in / S / 3.0mph 3.0mph 371 0.00in

10 :30 86.6 - . 85.7 - . 58.0 - . 29.89in / S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 33 1 0.00in

10 :40 85.7 - . 84.9 - . 57.9 - . 29.89in Calm 0.0mph 30 1 0.00in

10 :2 0 84.9 - . 84.2 - . 57.9 - . 29.89in Calm 0.0mph 401 0.00in

20:00 83.9 - . 83.3 - . 57.7 - . 29.89in Calm 2.0mph 411 0.00in

20:10 83.1 - . 82.7 - . 57.6 - . 29.88in / S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 421 0.00in

20:20 83.6 - . 83.0 - . 57.4 - . 29.88in S / 3.0mph 3.0mph 411 0.00in

20:30 85.0 - . 84.3 - . 58.0 - . 29.89in S / 5.0mph 7.0mph 401 0.00in

20:40 85.1 - . 84.4 - . 58.1 - . 29.89in S / 6.0mph 6.0mph 401 0.00in

20:2 0 84.9 - . 84.2 - . 57.9 - . 29.89in S / 6.0mph 6.0mph 401 0.00in

21:00 83.7 - . 83.1 - . 57.5 - . 29.89in S / 5.0mph 5.0mph 411 0.00in

21:10 83.5 - . 82.9 - . 57.3 - . 29.89in S / 6.0mph 7.0mph 411 0.00in

21:20 83.6 - . 83.0 - . 57.4 - . 29.89in S / 6.0mph 6.0mph 411 0.00in

21:40 82.7 - . 82.3 - . 57.3 - . 29.89in S / 5.0mph 5.0mph 421 0.00in

21:2 0 82.3 - . 82.1 - . 57.6 - . 29.89in S / 5.0mph 6.0mph 431 0.00in

22:00 82.3 - . 82.0 - . 56.9 - . 29.89in S / 6.0mph 7.0mph 421 0.00in

22:10 82.6 - . 82.2 - . 57.2 - . 29.89in S / 7.0mph 8.0mph 421 0.00in

22:20 82.4 - . 82.0 - . 57.0 - . 29.89in S / 7.0mph 8.0mph 421 0.00in

22:30 82.2 - . 81.9 - . 56.8 - . 29.89in S / 7.0mph 9.0mph 421 0.00in

22:40 81.5 - . 81.4 - . 56.8 - . 29.88in S / 7.0mph 11.0mph 431 0.00in

22:2 0 80.6 - . 80.7 - . 56.7 - . 29.88in S / 6.0mph 6.0mph 441 0.00in

23:00 80.3 - . 80.5 - . 56.4 - . 29.88in S / 5.0mph 7.0mph 441 0.00in

23:10 79.9 - . 4 56.0 - . 29.88in SS / 5.0mph 5.0mph 441 0.00in

23:20 80.3 - . 80.4 - . 55.8 - . 29.88in SS / 5.0mph 5.0mph 431 0.00in





23:30 80.7 - . 80.6 - . 55.5 - . 29.88in SS / 5.0mph 5.0mph 421 0.00in

23:40 80.6 - . 80.5 - . 55.4 - . 29.88in SS / 3.0mph 6.0mph 421 0.00in

23:2 0 80.1 - . 80.3 - . 55.6 - . 29.88in SS / 3.0mph 5.0mph 431 0.00in






00:00 79.7 °F - 55.2 °F 29.87in SE 4.0mph 5.0mph 43% 0.00in

00:10 79.7 °F - 55.2 °F 29.87in SE 5.0mph 5.0mph 43% 0.00in

00:20 79.3 °F - 54.9 °F 29.87in SSE 4.0mph 4.0mph 43% 0.00in



00:50 78.9 °F - 54.5 °F 29.87in SE 3.0mph 6.0mph 43% 0.00in





01:00 78.7 °F - 54.3 °F 29.87in SE 4.0mph 6.0mph 43% 0.00in




01:40 78.2 °F - 54.5 °F 29.86in SE 1.0mph 5.0mph 44% 0.00in

01:50 78.4 °F - 54.7 °F 29.86in SE 3.0mph 6.0mph 44% 0.00in

02:00 78.4 °F - 54.7 °F 29.86in SE 5.0mph 8.0mph 44% 0.00in

02:10 78.3 °F - 54.6 °F 29.86in SE 4.0mph 5.0mph 44% 0.00in



02:40 78.3 °F - 55.2 °F 29.85in SE 6.0mph 7.0mph 45% 0.00in

02:50 78.5 °F - 55.4 °F 29.84in SE 8.0mph 9.0mph 45% 0.00in

03:00 78.3 °F - 55.2 °F 29.84in SE 6.0mph 6.0mph 45% 0.00in

03:10 78.0 °F - 55.5 °F 29.84in SE 6.0mph 12.0mph 46% 0.00in


03:30 77.7 °F - 55.3 °F 29.84in SE 6.0mph 6.0mph 46% 0.00in

03:40 77.7 °F - 55.3 °F 29.83in South 6.0mph 6.0mph 46% 0.00in




04:20 77.9 °F - 56.6 °F 29.85in SE 1.0mph 1.0mph 48% 0.00in

04:30 76.1 °F - 56.1 °F 29.85in Calm 0.0mph 50% 0.00in

04:40 75.2 °F - 56.4 °F 29.85in NE 1.0mph 6.0mph 52% 0.00in

04:50 75.2 °F - 55.8 °F 29.85in ENE 4.0mph 4.0mph 51% 0.00in

05:00 75.3 °F - 55.9 °F 29.85in Calm 1.0mph 51% 0.00in

05:10 75.3 °F - 55.4 °F 29.85in East 2.0mph 2.0mph 50% 0.00in



05:40 76.4 °F - 55.3 °F 29.85in Calm 0.0mph 48% 0.00in

05:50 75.7 °F - 55.2 °F 29.85in Calm 0.0mph 49% 0.00in

06:00 76.1 °F - 54.4 °F 29.85in Calm 3.0mph 47% 0.00in

06:10 77.1 °F - 54.7 °F 29.85in ESE 1.0mph 3.0mph 46% 0.00in







06:40 80.0 °F 79.9 °F 53.5 °F 29.84in South 6.0mph 13.0mph 40% 0.00in

06:50 80.9 °F 80.5 °F 53.6 °F 29.84in ESE 9.0mph 12.0mph 39% 0.00in

07:00 81.3 °F 80.7 °F 53.3 °F 29.84in SE 9.0mph 9.0mph 38% 0.00in





07:50 81.0 °F 80.6 °F 53.7 °F 29.84in East 5.0mph 8.0mph 39% 0.00in






08:50 83.0 °F 82.1 °F 54.8 °F 29.83in SSE 10.0mph 10.0mph 38% 0.00in



















12:00 91.6 °F 90.1 °F 56.7 °F 29.82in SSW 9.0mph 13.0mph 31% 0.00in


Page + of 7Weather Station History : Weather Underground















14:10 96.8 °F 96.7 °F 59.3 °F 29.79in SW 4.0mph 4.0mph 29% 0.00in











16:00 98.5 °F 98.3 °F 58.8 °F 29.77in East 2.0mph 2.0mph 27% 0.00in




16:40 100.0 °F 99.6 °F 57.9 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 25% 0.00in


17:00 99.7 °F 99.7 °F 58.7 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 26% 0.00in

17:10 100.1 °F 99.8 °F 58.0 °F 29.76in Calm 1.0mph 25% 0.00in

17:20 99.8 °F 99.3 °F 57.7 °F 29.75in Calm 3.0mph 25% 0.00in








18:00 98.5 °F 97.9 °F 57.7 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 26% 0.00in

18:10 98.3 °F 98.0 °F 58.6 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 27% 0.00in

18:20 97.6 °F 97.0 °F 58.0 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 27% 0.00in

18:30 96.7 °F 96.9 °F 60.2 °F 29.75in Calm 2.0mph 30% 0.00in


18:50 94.8 °F 95.3 °F 61.2 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 33% 0.00in

19:00 93.4 °F 94.0 °F 61.7 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 35% 0.00in

19:10 90.8 °F 91.2 °F 61.7 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 38% 0.00in

19:20 88.7 °F 88.6 °F 60.6 °F 29.75in Calm 1.0mph 39% 0.00in

19:30 88.1 °F 87.8 °F 60.0 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 39% 0.00in

19:40 87.4 °F 87.1 °F 60.1 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 40% 0.00in

19:50 86.6 °F 86.4 °F 60.1 °F 29.75in Calm 0.0mph 41% 0.00in

20:00 85.8 °F 85.6 °F 60.1 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 42% 0.00in

20:10 84.8 °F 84.7 °F 59.8 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 43% 0.00in

20:20 83.7 °F 83.6 °F 59.5 °F 29.76in Calm 0.0mph 44% 0.00in

20:30 82.8 °F 83.0 °F 59.9 °F 29.77in Calm 0.0mph 46% 0.00in

20:40 82.4 °F 82.6 °F 59.5 °F 29.77in Calm 0.0mph 46% 0.00in

20:50 82.6 °F 82.8 °F 59.7 °F 29.77in Calm 0.0mph 46% 0.00in

21:00 81.7 °F 82.0 °F 59.5 °F 29.77in Calm 0.0mph 47% 0.00in

21:10 81.2 °F 81.7 °F 59.6 °F 29.78in Calm 0.0mph 48% 0.00in

21:20 81.0 °F 81.6 °F 60.0 °F 29.78in Calm 0.0mph 49% 0.00in

21:30 80.0 °F 80.9 °F 60.2 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 51% 0.00in

21:40 79.6 °F - 60.4 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 52% 0.00in

21:50 79.1 °F - 60.5 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 53% 0.00in

22:00 78.5 °F - 59.9 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 53% 0.00in

22:10 78.3 °F - 59.8 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 53% 0.00in

22:20 78.2 °F - 59.7 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 53% 0.00in

22:30 78.7 °F - 59.6 °F 29.79in Calm 0.0mph 52% 0.00in

22:40 79.0 °F - 60.4 °F 29.79in Calm 6.0mph 53% 0.00in

22:50 78.7 °F - 59.6 °F 29.79in NNW 6.0mph 6.0mph 52% 0.00in







23:20 80.1 °F 81.1 °F 60.9 °F 29.80in NNE 2.0mph 2.0mph 52% 0.00in



23:50 79.9 °F - 63.3 °F 29.81in NNE 5.0mph 7.0mph 57% 0.00in





Time Temp. Dew Point Pressure Wind Wind Speed Wind Gust Humidity Rainfall Rate (Hourly)

00:00 79.6 °F 63.5 °F 29.81in NNE 3.0mph 3.0mph 58% 0.00in

00:10 79.2 °F 63.6 °F 29.81in North 3.0mph 7.0mph 59% 0.00in








00:50 78.2 °F 63.2 °F 29.80in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 60% 0.00in


01:10 77.7 °F 63.2 °F 29.79in NE 4.0mph 4.0mph 61% 0.00in


01:30 77.3 °F 62.8 °F 29.79in NE 7.0mph 10.0mph 61% 0.00in



















04:40 71.0 °F 55.0 °F 29.83in NNW 7.0mph 11.0mph 57% 0.00in




05:20 70.6 °F 54.6 °F 29.88in WNW 9.0mph 9.0mph 57% 0.00in





05:30 70.7 °F 54.2 °F 29.87in NW 7.0mph 7.0mph 56% 0.00in










07:10 65.1 °F 55.1 °F 29.87in NE 10.0mph 12.0mph 70% 0.00in







08:20 64.8 °F 55.2 °F 29.95in NW 9.0mph 9.0mph 71% 0.00in


08:40 64.9 °F 54.9 °F 29.95in NW 7.0mph 10.0mph 70% 0.00in





09:30 64.4 °F 54.8 °F 29.95in NW 6.0mph 8.0mph 71% 0.00in












10:50 64.5 °F 54.9 °F 29.97in NE 9.0mph 9.0mph 71% 0.00in




11:30 64.8 °F 55.2 °F 30.01in NE 12.0mph 12.0mph 71% 0.00in

11:40 65.3 °F 55.7 °F 30.01in NE 13.0mph 13.0mph 71% 0.00in





12:30 67.3 °F 55.5 °F 30.01in NE 14.0mph 17.0mph 66% 0.00in

12:40 69.5 °F 56.3 °F 30.01in NE 16.0mph 17.0mph 63% 0.00in

12:50 69.8 °F 55.7 °F 30.02in NE 17.0mph 26.0mph 61% 0.00in


13:10 70.5 °F 56.9 °F 30.03in NE 15.0mph 15.0mph 62% 0.00in


13:30 70.4 °F 57.6 °F 30.04in NE 13.0mph 13.0mph 64% 0.00in



14:00 72.5 °F 57.8 °F 30.02in NE 10.0mph 10.0mph 60% 0.00in





14:50 73.3 °F 56.7 °F 30.04in NE 12.0mph 15.0mph 56% 0.00in



15:20 72.8 °F 56.7 °F 30.03in NE 12.0mph 13.0mph 57% 0.00in




, ime , emp. Dew Poin t Pres s ure Wind Wind Speed Wind - us t Humidity . a infa ll . a te / Hourly0

15:30 72.1 °F 1 2 .0 °F 3 0.03 in NE 13 .0mph 1+ .0mph 57% 0.00in

15:40 72.4 °F 1 2 .7 °F 3 0.0+ in NNE 1+ .0mph 1+ .0mph 57% 0.00in

15:50 71.1 °F 1 1 .0 °F 3 0.01 in NE 1+ .0mph 11 .0mph 56% 0.00in

16:00 71.3 °F 1 + . 4 °F 3 0.01 in ENE 11 .0mph 11 .0mph 56% 0.00in

16:10 71.3 °F 1 3 . 4 °F 3 0.02 in NNE 1+ .0mph 1+ .0mph 54% 0.00in

16:20 71.3 °F 1 3 . 3 °F 3 0.02 in NE 13 .0mph 13 .0mph 53% 0.00in

16:30 71.4 °F 1 + . 4 °F 3 0.02 in NNE 10.0mph 10.0mph 55% 0.00in

16:40 72.0 °F 1 3 . + °F 3 0.01 in NE 11.0mph 11.0mph 52% 0.00in

16:50 71.5 °F 1 3 . 3 °F 3 0.02 in NE 12.0mph 12 .0mph 52% 0.00in

17:00 71.1 °F 1 3 . 2 °F 3 0.01 in ENE 12 .0mph 15 .0mph 54% 0.00in

17:10 70.2 °F 1 3 .1 °F 3 0.01 in ENE 17.0mph 22.0mph 54% 0.00in

17:20 70.1 °F 1 2.2 °F 3 0.01 in NE 12 .0mph 12 .0mph 53% 0.00in

17:30 70.1 °F 1 3 .1 °F 3 0.01 in ENE 11 .0mph 15 .0mph 54% 0.00in

17:40 70.4 °F 1 3 . 3 °F 3 0.01 in NE 11 .0mph 11 .0mph 54% 0.00in

17:50 70.5 °F 1 2.5 °F 3 0.02 in NE 1+ .0mph 1+ .0mph 53% 0.00in

18:00 70.7 °F 1 2.7 °F 3 0.07in ENE 1+ .0mph 23 .0mph 53% 0.00in

18:10 70.3 °F 1 2.+ °F 3 0.07in NE 1+ .0mph 1+ .0mph 53% 0.00in

18:20 2 5 . 5 °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.07in NE 13 .0mph 13 .0mph 52% 0.00in

18:40 2 5 . 2 °F 1 1.7 °F 3 0.04 in NE 4 .0mph 13 .0mph 53% 0.00in

18:50 2 4 . 5 °F 1 2.1 °F 3 0.05 in NE 10.0mph 10.0mph 55% 0.00in

19:00 2 4 . + °F 1 1.2 °F 3 0.05 in East 10.0mph 10.0mph 55% 0.00in

19:10 2 7.5 °F 1 1.2 °F 3 0.05 in NE 5 .0mph 11.0mph 56% 0.00in

19:20 2 7.1 °F 1 1.7 °F 3 0.05 in ENE 5 .0mph 5 .0mph 57% 0.00in

19:30 2 7.0 °F 1 1.3 °F 3 0.10in NE 4 .0mph 4 .0mph 57% 0.00in

19:40 2 2 .7 °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.10in NE 4 .0mph 10.0mph 58% 0.00in

19:50 2 2 . 3 °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.10in NE 7.0mph 7.0mph 59% 0.00in

20:00 2 1 . 5 °F 1 1.2 °F 3 0.10in NE 2 .0mph 2 .0mph 59% 0.00in

20:10 2 1 . 3 °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.11in ENE + .0mph + .0mph 61% 0.00in

20:20 2 + .7 °F 1 1.+ °F 3 0.11in ENE + .0mph 7.0mph 62% 0.00in

20:30 2 + . + °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.12in NE 1 .0mph 1 .0mph 63% 0.00in




, ime , emp. Dew Poin t Pres s ure Wind Wind Speed Wind - us t Humidity . a infa ll . a te / Hourly0

20:40 2 + .2 °F 1 1.3 °F 3 0.13 in NE 2 .0mph 2 .0mph 63% 0.00in

20:50 2 3 . 5 °F 1 1.1 °F 3 0.13 in ENE 7.0mph 11.0mph 64% 0.00in

21:00 2 3 . 5 °F 1 1.5 °F 3 0.1+ in ENE 7.0mph 7.0mph 65% 0.00in

21:10 2 3 . + °F 1 1.4 °F 3 0.1+ in ENE + .0mph 1 .0mph 66% 0.00in

21:20 2 3 .1 °F 1 2.0 °F 3 0.11 in ENE 1 .0mph 7.0mph 67% 0.00in

21:30 2 2.+ °F 1 2.1 °F 3 0.12 in ENE + .0mph + .0mph 69% 0.00in

21:40 2 1.2 °F 1 1.7 °F 3 0.12 in Calm 0.0mph 70% 0.00in

21:50 2 1.1 °F 1 2.0 °F 3 0.12 in ENE 2.0mph 2.0mph 71% 0.00in


22:10 2 1.3 °F 1 1.4 °F 3 0.17in ENE 2.0mph 2.0mph 71% 0.00in

22:20 2 1.1 °F 1 1.2 °F 3 0.17in ENE 2.0mph 2.0mph 71% 0.00in

22:30 2 1.2 °F 1 2.1 °F 3 0.12 in NE 3 .0mph 3 .0mph 72% 0.00in

22:40 2 1.1 °F 1 2.0 °F 3 0.12 in NE 1 .0mph 2 .0mph 71% 0.00in


23:00 2 1.+ °F 1 1.5 °F 3 0.17in NE 2 .0mph 7.0mph 71% 0.00in











00:00 61.5 °F 51.6 °F 30.18in NE 7.0mph 11.0mph 70% 0.00in

00:10 61.4 °F 51.5 °F 30.18in NE 8.0mph 12.0mph 70% 0.00in

00:20 61.3 °F 51.8 °F 30.18in NE 6.0mph 10.0mph 71% 0.00in





00:30 61.3 °F 51.8 °F 30.18in NE 10.0mph 10.0mph 71% 0.00in

00:40 61.2 °F 51.7 °F 30.18in NE 9.0mph 9.0mph 71% 0.00in

00:50 60.7 °F 51.6 °F 30.17in NE 7.0mph 7.0mph 72% 0.00in

01:00 60.7 °F 51.6 °F 30.17in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 72% 0.00in

01:10 60.0 °F 50.9 °F 30.18in NE 1.0mph 1.0mph 72% 0.00in






02:10 57.8 °F 50.6 °F 30.18in NE 1.0mph 1.0mph 77% 0.00in



02:40 57.2 °F 50.7 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in





03:30 57.5 °F 50.3 °F 30.19in NE 7.0mph 11.0mph 77% 0.00in

03:40 57.1 °F 50.0 °F 30.20in NE 5.0mph 6.0mph 77% 0.00in

03:50 56.9 °F 49.4 °F 30.20in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 76% 0.00in

04:00 56.8 °F 49.3 °F 30.20in NE 5.0mph 7.0mph 76% 0.00in

04:10 56.8 °F 49.3 °F 30.21in NE 5.0mph 5.0mph 76% 0.00in

04:20 56.5 °F 49.0 °F 30.22in NE 3.0mph 3.0mph 76% 0.00in

04:30 56.6 °F 49.1 °F 30.23in NE 3.0mph 3.0mph 76% 0.00in

04:40 56.5 °F 48.7 °F 30.24in NE 1.0mph 1.0mph 75% 0.00in

04:50 56.7 °F 48.5 °F 30.25in ENE 2.0mph 7.0mph 74% 0.00in

05:00 57.2 °F 48.3 °F 30.25in NE 5.0mph 5.0mph 72% 0.00in

05:10 57.3 °F 47.2 °F 30.25in NE 8.0mph 13.0mph 69% 0.00in






05:30 56.8 °F 47.1 °F 30.26in NE 8.0mph 9.0mph 70% 0.00in

05:40 56.7 °F 46.6 °F 30.26in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 69% 0.00in

05:50 56.4 °F 46.4 °F 30.26in NE 7.0mph 7.0mph 69% 0.00in

06:00 55.9 °F 46.3 °F 30.27in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 70% 0.00in

06:10 55.5 °F 46.2 °F 30.27in Calm 0.0mph 71% 0.00in

06:20 54.8 °F 45.6 °F 30.28in Calm 4.0mph 71% 0.00in



06:50 53.8 °F 45.0 °F 30.27in NE 5.0mph 6.0mph 72% 0.00in

07:00 54.0 °F 44.8 °F 30.28in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 71% 0.00in





07:50 54.5 °F 43.8 °F 30.29in NE 6.0mph 8.0mph 67% 0.00in

08:00 54.9 °F 43.4 °F 30.30in NE 6.0mph 7.0mph 65% 0.00in



08:30 55.4 °F 41.7 °F 30.31in NE 10.0mph 10.0mph 60% 0.00in






09:40 55.7 °F 39.3 °F 30.31in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 54% 0.00in


10:00 56.0 °F 39.6 °F 30.31in East 8.0mph 10.0mph 54% 0.00in

10:10 55.5 °F 38.6 °F 30.30in NE 10.0mph 10.0mph 53% 0.00in


10:30 55.8 °F 38.4 °F 30.31in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 52% 0.00in





10:40 55.7 °F 39.3 °F 30.32in NE 5.0mph 5.0mph 54% 0.00in



11:10 56.2 °F 37.8 °F 30.34in NE 6.0mph 8.0mph 50% 0.00in


11:30 56.9 °F 38.4 °F 30.34in NE 5.0mph 8.0mph 50% 0.00in


11:50 57.4 °F 37.9 °F 30.34in NE 4.0mph 4.0mph 48% 0.00in


12:10 57.7 °F 37.0 °F 30.33in NE 7.0mph 7.0mph 46% 0.00in







13:20 59.0 °F 37.1 °F 30.30in NE 6.0mph 8.0mph 44% 0.00in






14:30 60.0 °F 36.8 °F 30.27in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 42% 0.00in



15:00 59.7 °F 37.2 °F 30.26in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 43% 0.00in

15:10 59.8 °F 36.6 °F 30.26in NE 6.0mph 7.0mph 42% 0.00in

15:20 59.9 °F 36.7 °F 30.26in NE 8.0mph 8.0mph 42% 0.00in







1, :, 0 60.4 - . 37.2 - . 30.26in / 0 3.0mph 3.0mph + 21 0.00in

12 :00 60.4 - . 36.6 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 5.0mph 8.0mph + 11 0.00in

12 :10 60.8 - . 36.9 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 5.0mph 5.0mph + 11 0.00in

12 :20 60.6 - . 36.1 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 6.0mph 6.0mph + 01 0.00in

12 :3 0 60.6 - . 36.1 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 5.0mph 7.0mph + 01 0.00in

12 :+ 0 60.5 - . 36.7 - . 30.26in / 0 5.0mph 5.0mph + 11 0.00in

12 :, 0 60.7 - . 36.8 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 3.0mph 3.0mph + 11 0.00in

17:00 60.6 - . 36.8 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 2.0mph 8.0mph + 11 0.00in

17:10 60.4 - . 37.2 - . 30.26in / 0 3.0mph 5.0mph + 21 0.00in

17:20 60.1 - . 36.9 - . 30.26in / 0 3.0mph 3.0mph + 21 0.00in

17:3 0 59.9 - . 37.3 - . 30.26in 0 / 0 1.0mph 3.0mph + 3 1 0.00in

17:+ 0 59.0 - . 39.9 - . 30.26in / 0 2.0mph 2.0mph + 4 1 0.00in

17:, 0 58.1 - . 40.1 - . 30.25in / 0 2.0mph 4.0mph , 11 0.00in

15 :00 56.5 - . 41.0 - . 30.24in 0 / 0 4.0mph 4.0mph , 2 1 0.00in

15 :10 55.9 - . 42.6 - . 30.23in 0 / 0 4.0mph 5.0mph 2 11 0.00in

15 :20 55.5 - . 43.9 - . 30.24in 0 / 0 1.0mph 1.0mph 2 , 1 0.00in

15 :3 0 55.2 - . 42.8 - . 30.24in Calm 0.0mph 2 3 1 0.00in

15 :+ 0 55.2 - . 43.6 - . 30.24in Calm 0.0mph 2 , 1 0.00in

15 :, 0 55.1 - . 44.3 - . 30.24in Calm 0.0mph 2 71 0.00in

14 :00 55.2 - . 45.6 - . 30.24in Calm 0.0mph 701 0.00in

14 :10 55.0 - . 45.4 - . 30.21in 0 / 0 1.0mph 3.0mph 701 0.00in

14 :20 54.3 - . 44.7 - . 30.21in / 0 3.0mph 3.0mph 701 0.00in

14 :3 0 54.0 - . 45.2 - . 30.20in 0 / 0 3.0mph 4.0mph 721 0.00in

14 :+ 0 53.9 - . 44.7 - . 30.20in 0 / 0 2.0mph 2.0mph 711 0.00in

14 :, 0 54.1 - . 44.5 - . 30.20in 0 a s t 1.0mph 1.0mph 701 0.00in

20:00 54.1 - . 44.2 - . 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 2 4 1 0.00in

20:10 54.2 - . 45.0 - . 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 711 0.00in

20:20 54.2 - . 44.6 - . 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 701 0.00in

20:3 0 54.4 - . 44.4 - . 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 2 4 1 0.00in

20:+ 0 54.5 - . 44.2 - . 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in





20:, 0 54.5 - . 44.2 - . 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

21:00 54.6 - . 43.9 - . 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 2 71 0.00in

21:10 54.8 - . 43.7 - . 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 2 2 1 0.00in

21:20 54.9 - . 43.7 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 2 1 0.00in

21:3 0 55.0 - . 43.8 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 2 1 0.00in

21:+ 0 54.9 - . 44.9 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 4 1 0.00in

21:, 0 54.8 - . 44.4 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

22:00 54.7 - . 44.3 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

22:10 55.1 - . 43.9 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 2 1 0.00in

22:20 54.9 - . 44.5 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

22:3 0 55.0 - . 44.2 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 71 0.00in

22:+ 0 55.1 - . 44.7 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

22:, 0 55.1 - . 44.7 - . 30.23in Calm 0.0mph 2 5 1 0.00in

23 :00 55.1 - . 47.0 - . 30.23in Calm 0.0mph 7+ 1 0.00in

23 :10 54.8 - . 46.7 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 7+ 1 0.00in

23 :20 54.8 - . 47.7 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 771 0.00in

23 :3 0 54.8 - . 47.4 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 72 1 0.00in

23 :+ 0 55.0 - . 47.2 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 7, 1 0.00in

23 :, 0 55.2 - . 47.4 - . 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 7, 1 0.00in






00:00 55.2 °F 48.1 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 77% 0.00in

00:10 55.1 °F 47.3 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 75% 0.00in

00:20 55.3 °F 47.9 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in





00:30 55.4 °F 46.9 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 73% 0.00in

00:40 55.5 °F 48.1 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in

00:50 55.6 °F 46.0 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 70% 0.00in

01:00 55.6 °F 44.4 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 66% 0.00in

01:10 55.7 °F 43.7 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 64% 0.00in

01:20 55.6 °F 44.0 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

01:30 55.5 °F 44.7 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 67% 0.00in

01:40 55.5 °F 43.9 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

01:50 55.8 °F 44.2 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

02:00 55.8 °F 44.2 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

02:10 55.9 °F 44.3 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

02:20 56.0 °F 44.8 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 66% 0.00in

02:40 55.4 °F 45.0 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 68% 0.00in

02:50 54.9 °F 47.1 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 75% 0.00in

03:00 54.3 °F 46.9 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in

03:10 53.9 °F 46.9 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 77% 0.00in

03:20 53.8 °F 47.4 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in

03:30 53.5 °F 47.1 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in

03:40 53.4 °F 47.4 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

03:50 53.3 °F 47.6 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

04:00 52.9 °F 47.9 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 83% 0.05in

04:10 52.7 °F 48.0 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 84% 0.00in

04:20 52.6 °F 47.6 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 83% 0.00in

04:30 52.9 °F 48.5 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 85% 0.00in

04:40 52.8 °F 48.1 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 84% 0.00in












06:00 53.3 °F 47.3 °F 30.18in ESE 5.0mph 5.0mph 80% 0.00in


06:20 53.5 °F 47.5 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

06:30 53.7 °F 47.3 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in

06:40 53.8 °F 47.8 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

06:50 53.8 °F 48.1 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

07:00 53.8 °F 47.4 °F 30.19in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in


07:20 54.4 °F 47.3 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 77% 0.00in

07:30 54.6 °F 47.5 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 77% 0.00in

07:40 54.6 °F 47.9 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in

07:50 54.9 °F 47.8 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 77% 0.00in

08:00 55.0 °F 48.3 °F 30.20in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in


08:20 55.8 °F 48.0 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 75% 0.00in

08:30 56.1 °F 47.9 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 74% 0.00in



09:00 56.5 °F 48.3 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 74% 0.00in


09:20 57.0 °F 48.4 °F 30.21in Calm 0.0mph 73% 0.00in

09:30 56.8 °F 48.2 °F 30.21in SE 1.0mph 2.0mph 73% 0.00in

09:40 56.9 °F 48.3 °F 30.22in SSE 1.0mph 4.0mph 73% 0.00in



10:10 55.1 °F 48.7 °F 30.22in SE 5.0mph 5.0mph 79% 0.00in


10:30 54.7 °F 49.6 °F 30.23in SE 5.0mph 5.0mph 83% 0.00in





10:40 55.7 °F 50.9 °F 30.22in SE 5.0mph 5.0mph 84% 0.00in

10:50 56.2 °F 49.8 °F 30.22in SE 7.0mph 9.0mph 79% 0.00in

11:00 56.3 °F 49.5 °F 30.23in SE 6.0mph 6.0mph 78% 0.00in

11:10 56.3 °F 49.2 °F 30.23in SE 5.0mph 7.0mph 77% 0.00in

11:20 55.9 °F 49.1 °F 30.23in SE 7.0mph 9.0mph 78% 0.00in

11:30 55.0 °F 49.6 °F 30.23in South 7.0mph 8.0mph 82% 0.58in



12:00 55.6 °F 51.8 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 87% 0.04in

12:10 55.8 °F 51.7 °F 30.23in SE 2.0mph 2.0mph 86% 0.04in

12:20 56.0 °F 50.6 °F 30.22in SE 6.0mph 6.0mph 82% 0.00in

12:30 56.0 °F 50.6 °F 30.22in SE 4.0mph 4.0mph 82% 0.00in

12:40 56.1 °F 51.0 °F 30.22in Calm 0.0mph 83% 0.00in

12:50 55.8 °F 50.7 °F 30.21in SE 3.0mph 4.0mph 83% 0.00in

13:00 55.7 °F 51.3 °F 30.21in SE 5.0mph 7.0mph 85% 0.00in

13:10 55.6 °F 50.8 °F 30.21in SE 5.0mph 5.0mph 84% 0.00in


13:30 54.5 °F 50.7 °F 30.21in SE 1.0mph 1.0mph 87% 0.00in

13:40 53.9 °F 50.4 °F 30.21in SE 5.0mph 6.0mph 88% 0.09in

13:50 53.6 °F 50.4 °F 30.18in SE 8.0mph 13.0mph 89% 0.10in




14:30 53.9 °F 51.3 °F 30.16in SE 7.0mph 7.0mph 91% 0.23in




15:10 54.9 °F 52.6 °F 30.16in SE 6.0mph 6.0mph 92% 0.04in

15:20 55.0 °F 52.4 °F 30.16in SE 1.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in

15:30 55.0 °F 52.4 °F 30.16in SE 1.0mph 1.0mph 91% 0.00in





1, :, 0 54.9 - . 52.6 - . 30.14in / a s t 1.0mph 6.0mph 0 21 1.12in

12 :00 54.5 - . 52.2 - . 30.12in / S / 8.0mph 12.0mph 0 21 0.22in

12 :10 54.5 - . 52.2 - . 30.13in S / 8.0mph 8.0mph 0 21 0.23in

12 :20 54.9 - . 52.9 - . 30.13in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.11in

12 :3 0 55.3 - . 53.3 - . 30.13in S / 4.0mph 4.0mph 0 3 1 0.06in

12 :+ 0 55.5 - . 53.5 - . 30.13in / S / 4.0mph 5.0mph 0 3 1 0.04in

12 :, 0 55.6 - . 53.3 - . 30.14in / S / 3.0mph 3.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:00 55.6 - . 53.3 - . 30.13in / S / 2.0mph 3.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:10 55.9 - . 53.6 - . 30.13in / S / 4.0mph 4.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:20 56.0 - . 53.7 - . 30.13in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:3 0 56.2 - . 53.9 - . 30.12in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:+ 0 56.4 - . 54.1 - . 30.12in S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 0 21 0.00in

17:, 0 56.4 - . 54.1 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :00 56.5 - . 54.2 - . 30.11in / S / 2.0mph 4.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :10 56.7 - . 54.4 - . 30.11in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :20 56.7 - . 54.4 - . 30.10in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :3 0 56.8 - . 54.5 - . 30.10in / S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :+ 0 56.9 - . 54.6 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

14 :, 0 57.1 - . 54.8 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :00 57.1 - . 54.8 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :10 57.3 - . 55.0 - . 30.10in S / 4.0mph 4.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :20 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :3 0 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :+ 0 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.09in S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 0 21 0.00in

10 :, 0 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.09in S / 4.0mph 4.0mph 0 21 0.00in

20:00 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.09in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

20:10 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

20:20 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

20:3 0 57.7 - . 55.7 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

20:+ 0 57.7 - . 55.7 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in





20:, 0 57.7 - . 55.7 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

21:00 57.8 - . 55.8 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

21:10 57.9 - . 55.9 - . 30.11in S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

21:20 57.9 - . 55.6 - . 30.11in S / 2.0mph 3.0mph 0 21 0.00in

21:3 0 57.9 - . 55.6 - . 30.12in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

21:+ 0 57.9 - . 55.6 - . 30.12in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

21:, 0 57.8 - . 55.8 - . 30.12in Calm 0.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

22:00 57.7 - . 55.7 - . 30.12in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 3 1 0.00in

22:10 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

22:20 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.12in S / 5.0mph 5.0mph 0 21 0.00in

22:3 0 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.11in S / 2.0mph 2.0mph 0 21 0.00in

22:+ 0 57.5 - . 55.2 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

22:, 0 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :00 57.6 - . 55.3 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :10 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :20 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :3 0 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.11in / S / 3.0mph 3.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :+ 0 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.11in / S / 1.0mph 1.0mph 0 21 0.00in

23 :, 0 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.12in Calm 0.0mph 0 21 0.00in






00:00 57.8 °F 55.5 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

00:10 57.8 °F 55.5 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

00:20 57.8 °F 55.5 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in





00:30 57.9 °F 55.6 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

00:40 57.9 °F 55.6 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

00:50 57.9 °F 55.6 °F 30.11in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

01:00 58.0 °F 55.7 °F 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

01:10 58.0 °F 55.7 °F 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in


01:30 58.0 °F 55.7 °F 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

01:40 58.0 °F 55.7 °F 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

01:50 58.0 °F 55.7 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:00 57.8 °F 55.5 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:10 57.6 °F 55.3 °F 30.09in SE 1.0mph 4.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:20 57.7 °F 55.4 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:30 57.5 °F 55.2 °F 30.09in Calm 6.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:40 57.5 °F 55.2 °F 30.09in SE 1.0mph 1.0mph 92% 0.00in

02:50 57.2 °F 54.9 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

03:00 57.1 °F 54.8 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

03:10 57.0 °F 54.7 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

03:20 57.2 °F 55.2 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

03:30 57.3 °F 55.3 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

03:40 57.3 °F 55.3 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

03:50 57.3 °F 55.3 °F 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:00 57.3 °F 55.3 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:10 57.2 °F 55.2 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:20 57.1 °F 55.1 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:30 57.1 °F 55.1 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:40 57.0 °F 55.0 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:50 56.9 °F 54.9 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:00 56.8 °F 54.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:10 56.7 °F 54.7 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:20 56.4 °F 54.4 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in





0+ :, 0 56.3 - . 54.6 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

0+ :0 0 56.4 - . 54.7 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

0+ :+ 0 56.4 - . 54.7 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :00 56.5 - . 54.8 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :10 56.4 - . 54.7 - . 30.06in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :20 56.4 - . 54.7 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :, 0 56.5 - . 54.8 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :0 0 56.5 - . 54.8 - . 30.06in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

02 :+ 0 56.4 - . 54.7 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / 0 1 0.00in

07:00 56.4 - . 54.4 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

07:10 56.3 - . 54.3 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

07:20 56.2 - . 54.2 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

07:, 0 56.0 - . 54.0 - . 30.07in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

07:0 0 56.0 - . 54.0 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

07:+ 0 56.0 - . 54.0 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

03 :00 56.4 - . 54.4 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

03 :10 56.8 - . 54.8 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

03 :20 57.1 - . 55.1 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / , 1 0.00in

03 :, 0 57.3 - . 55.3 - . 30.08in 4 S 4 1.0mph 4.0mph / , 1 0.00in

03 :0 0 57.7 - . 55.4 - . 30.08in 4 S 4 1.0mph 1.0mph / 21 0.00in

03 :+ 0 58.2 - . 55.9 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / 21 0.00in

0/ :00 58.6 - . 56.0 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph / 11 0.00in

0/ :10 58.8 - . 55.6 - . 30.08in 4 S 4 1.0mph 1.0mph 3 / 1 0.00in

0/ :20 58.7 - . 55.2 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 3 3 1 0.00in

0/ :, 0 59.0 - . 55.4 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 3 3 1 0.00in

0/ :0 0 59.0 - . 55.1 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 3 71 0.00in

0/ :+ 0 59.6 - . 55.4 - . 30.09in 4 S 4 1.0mph 1.0mph 3 2 1 0.00in

10:00 59.5 - . 55.0 - . 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 3 + 1 0.00in

10:10 59.7 - . 55.2 - . 30.12in 5 5 W 1.0mph 1.0mph 3 + 1 0.00in

10:20 59.9 - . 55.7 - . 30.10in Calm 0.0mph 3 2 1 0.00in





10:, 0 60.3 - . 56.1 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph 3 2 1 0.00in

10:0 0 60.3 - . 56.1 - . 30.09in 4 5 4 1.0mph 5.0mph 3 2 1 0.00in

10:+ 0 61.2 - . 56.7 - . 30.09in 4 5 4 2.0mph 5.0mph 3 + 1 0.00in

11:00 61.6 - . 56.7 - . 30.09in 5 4 3.0mph 3.0mph 3 0 1 0.00in

11:10 61.3 - . 56.1 - . 30.09in 5 4 3.0mph 3.0mph 3 , 1 0.00in

11:, 0 59.6 - . 56.0 - . 30.10in 4 5 4 6.0mph 6.0mph 3 3 1 0.11in

11:0 0 59.3 - . 56.4 - . 30.09in Calm 0.0mph / 01 0.21in

11:+ 0 58.9 - . 56.3 - . 30.08in Calm 6.0mph / 11 0.61in

12:10 58.7 - . 56.7 - . 30.07in 4 5 4 5.0mph 5.0mph / , 1 0.13in

12:20 59.0 - . 57.0 - . 30.08in 5 4 2.0mph 2.0mph / , 1 0.05in

12:, 0 59.0 - . 57.0 - . 30.07in 5 4 2.0mph 2.0mph / , 1 0.14in

12:0 0 59.6 - . 57.6 - . 30.07in 4 5 4 2.0mph 7.0mph / , 1 0.04in

12:+ 0 60.3 - . 58.3 - . 30.06in 5 4 5.0mph 8.0mph / , 1 0.00in

1, :00 61.1 - . 59.1 - . 30.05in 5 4 7.0mph 8.0mph / , 1 0.00in

1, :10 62.0 - . 60.0 - . 30.05in 4 5 4 9.0mph 12.0mph / , 1 0.00in

1, :20 62.6 - . 59.9 - . 30.05in 4 a s t 11.0mph 11.0mph / 11 0.00in

1, :, 0 63.5 - . 60.8 - . 30.04in 4 5 4 10.0mph 12.0mph / 11 0.00in

1, :0 0 64.8 - . 61.5 - . 30.04in 4 a s t 9.0mph 9.0mph 3 / 1 0.00in

1, :+ 0 66.1 - . 62.8 - . 30.03in 4 5 4 8.0mph 8.0mph 3 / 1 0.00in

10 :00 68.2 - . 62.8 - . 30.02in 4 a s t 9.0mph 9.0mph 3 , 1 0.00in

10 :10 69.6 - . 62.4 - . 30.01in 4 S 4 9.0mph 11.0mph 73 1 0.00in

10 :20 70.8 - . 62.9 - . 30.01in 4 S 4 10.0mph 13.0mph 72 1 0.00in

10 :, 0 71.3 - . 63.0 - . 30.00in 4 S 4 10.0mph 10.0mph 7+ 1 0.00in

10 :0 0 71.7 - . 62.6 - . 30.00in 4 S 4 10.0mph 10.0mph 7, 1 0.00in

10 :+ 0 71.8 - . 62.7 - . 29.99in 4 a s t 9.0mph 9.0mph 7, 1 0.00in

1+ :00 72.7 - . 63.1 - . 29.98in 4 S 4 10.0mph 11.0mph 721 0.00in

1+ :10 72.4 - . 63.6 - . 29.98in 4 a s t 10.0mph 10.0mph 70 1 0.00in

1+ :20 73.2 - . 63.2 - . 29.97in 4 a s t 11.0mph 11.0mph 711 0.00in

1+ :, 0 72.9 - . 63.3 - . 29.97in 4 a s t 9.0mph 15.0mph 721 0.00in

1+ :0 0 72.9 - . 63.7 - . 29.96in 4 S 4 9.0mph 9.0mph 7, 1 0.00in





1, :, 0 73.5 - . 63.5 - . 29.96in / a s t 11.0mph 11.0mph 710 0.00in

11 :00 74.2 - . 63.4 - . 29.95in / S / 10.0mph 10.0mph 1 2 0 0.00in

11 :10 75.0 - . 64.1 - . 29.95in S / 8.0mph 8.0mph 1 2 0 0.00in

11 :20 76.0 - . 65.1 - . 29.95in / a s t 9.0mph 11.0mph 1 2 0 0.00in

11 :30 76.5 - . 64.7 - . 29.94in / S / 9.0mph 11.0mph 1 70 0.00in

11 :40 77.8 - . 65.5 - . 29.93in / S / 9.0mph 16.0mph 1 1 0 0.00in

11 :, 0 78.7 - . 65.0 - . 29.92in / S / 10.0mph 10.0mph 1 30 0.00in

17:00 79.8 - . 65.6 - . 29.92in / S / 9.0mph 9.0mph 1 20 0.00in

17:10 79.6 - . 65.9 - . 29.91in / a s t 10.0mph 11.0mph 1 30 0.00in

17:20 79.8 - . 65.6 - . 29.91in / S / 11.0mph 11.0mph 1 20 0.00in

17:30 79.3 - . 65.6 - . 29.91in / a s t 11.0mph 11.0mph 1 30 0.00in

17:40 78.8 - . 65.1 - . 29.90in / S / 12.0mph 22.0mph 1 30 0.00in

17:, 0 78.7 - . 65.0 - . 29.90in / S / 13.0mph 13.0mph 1 30 0.00in

14 :00 78.5 - . 65.3 - . 29.90in / a s t 12.0mph 12.0mph 1 40 0.00in

14 :10 77.2 - . 64.5 - . 29.90in / a s t 11.0mph 11.0mph 1 , 0 0.00in

14 :20 76.8 - . 64.6 - . 29.90in / S / 11.0mph 12.0mph 1 1 0 0.00in

14 :30 76.3 - . 64.5 - . 29.90in / a s t 12.0mph 12.0mph 1 70 0.00in

14 :40 75.7 - . 64.4 - . 29.90in / S / 10.0mph 16.0mph 1 4 0 0.00in

14 :, 0 75.0 - . 64.5 - . 29.90in / S / 10.0mph 10.0mph 700 0.00in

12 :00 74.6 - . 64.2 - . 29.90in / S / 11.0mph 12.0mph 700 0.00in

12 :10 74.2 - . 64.2 - . 29.89in / S / 11.0mph 11.0mph 710 0.00in

12 :20 73.7 - . 64.1 - . 29.90in / S / 12.0mph 14.0mph 720 0.00in

12 :30 73.3 - . 64.1 - . 29.91in S / 12.0mph 12.0mph 730 0.00in

12 :40 72.5 - . 63.7 - . 29.91in / S / 9.0mph 13.0mph 740 0.00in

12 :, 0 71.8 - . 63.4 - . 29.91in / a s t 9.0mph 9.0mph 7, 0 0.00in

20:00 71.2 - . 62.9 - . 29.92in / S / 11.0mph 14.0mph 7, 0 0.00in

20:10 70.6 - . 62.3 - . 29.92in / S / 12.0mph 12.0mph 7, 0 0.00in

20:20 70.2 - . 62.3 - . 29.91in / S / 12.0mph 12.0mph 71 0 0.00in

20:30 70.0 - . 62.1 - . 29.92in / S / 13.0mph 13.0mph 71 0 0.00in

20:40 69.9 - . 62.0 - . 29.92in / S / 13.0mph 14.0mph 71 0 0.00in






21:00 69.8 °F 62.3 °F 29.92in SE 13.0mph 13.0mph 77% 0.00in

21:10 69.6 °F 62.1 °F 29.92in SE 12.0mph 19.0mph 77% 0.00in

21:20 70.2 °F 62.6 °F 29.96in WSW 10.0mph 10.0mph 77% 0.00in

21:30 68.4 °F 62.7 °F 29.97in SW 7.0mph 11.0mph 82% 0.00in

21:40 66.0 °F 62.3 °F 30.00in SSW 9.0mph 18.0mph 88% 0.05in

21:50 64.7 °F 62.0 °F 29.98in SW 7.0mph 13.0mph 91% 0.29in

22:10 64.5 °F 62.4 °F 29.99in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.30in



22:40 65.3 °F 63.2 °F 29.99in NE 2.0mph 6.0mph 93% 0.07in

22:50 65.6 °F 63.5 °F 30.02in NW 2.0mph 2.0mph 93% 0.06in











01:00 66.5 °F - 63.2 °F 29.94in SE 7.0mph 7.0mph 89% 0.00in

01:10 66.4 °F - 63.1 °F 29.94in SSW 10.0mph 10.0mph 89% 0.00in

01:20 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.93in SE 12.0mph 12.0mph 90% 0.10in

01:30 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.94in SE 10.0mph 14.0mph 90% 0.05in


01:50 65.2 °F - 62.8 °F 29.88in SE 11.0mph 11.0mph 92% 0.06in

02:00 65.6 °F - 62.9 °F 29.88in SE 16.0mph 16.0mph 91% 0.05in



02:30 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.91in SE 7.0mph 10.0mph 90% 0.00in


02:50 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.91in SE 7.0mph 14.0mph 90% 0.00in

03:00 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.91in SE 8.0mph 8.0mph 90% 0.00in




03:40 66.3 °F - 62.6 °F 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 88% 0.00in

03:50 66.1 °F - 62.8 °F 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

04:00 66.2 °F - 62.9 °F 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

04:10 66.1 °F - 62.8 °F 29.91in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in



04:40 65.6 °F - 62.9 °F 29.91in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

04:50 65.5 °F - 62.8 °F 29.91in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in







06:00 65.1 °F - 62.1 °F 29.92in SE 6.0mph 7.0mph 90% 0.00in


06:20 64.9 °F - 61.9 °F 29.92in SE 5.0mph 8.0mph 90% 0.00in





0+ :, 0 64.9 - . / 61.6 - . 29.91in S 0 9.0mph 9.0mph 1 2 3 0.00in

0+ :4 0 64.7 - . / 61.4 - . 29.92in S 0 8.0mph 9.0mph 1 2 3 0.00in

0+ :5 0 64.5 - . / 60.9 - . 29.92in S 0 6.0mph 6.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

07:00 64.3 - . / 60.7 - . 29.92in SS 0 8.0mph 8.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

07:10 64.2 - . / 60.6 - . 29.92in 0 S 0 7.0mph 13.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

07:20 64.1 - . / 60.5 - . 29.92in 0 S 0 7.0mph 7.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

07:, 0 64.1 - . / 60.5 - . 29.93in S 0 4.0mph 7.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

07:4 0 64.2 - . / 60.2 - . 29.94in SS 0 4.0mph 4.0mph 1 73 0.00in

07:5 0 64.1 - . / 60.2 - . 29.93in SS 0 2.0mph 2.0mph 1 73 0.00in

01 :00 64.4 - . / 60.4 - . 29.94in S 0 1.0mph 1.0mph 1 73 0.00in

01 :10 64.3 - . / 60.3 - . 29.94in South 1.0mph 1.0mph 1 73 0.00in

01 :20 64.1 - . / 60.2 - . 29.94in SS 0 2.0mph 4.0mph 1 73 0.00in

01 :, 0 64.0 - . / 60.4 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

01 :4 0 64.0 - . / 60.4 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

01 :5 0 64.1 - . / 60.5 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

02 :00 64.2 - . / 60.6 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

02 :10 64.7 - . / 61.1 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 1 3 0.00in

02 :20 65.0 - . / 61.0 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 73 0.00in

02 :, 0 65.2 - . / 61.2 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 73 0.00in

02 :4 0 65.7 - . / 61.7 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 73 0.00in

02 :5 0 66.2 - . / 61.9 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 + 3 0.00in

10:00 66.5 - . / 61.5 - . 29.94in Calm 0.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

10:10 66.9 - . / 62.2 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 5 3 0.00in

10:20 67.9 - . / 63.2 - . 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 1 5 3 0.00in

10:, 0 68.0 - . / 63.0 - . 29.95in South 1.0mph 4.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

10:4 0 68.1 - . / 63.1 - . 29.95in 0 S 0 4.0mph 7.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

10:5 0 67.9 - . / 62.9 - . 29.96in S 0 2.0mph 7.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

11:00 67.9 - . / 63.2 - . 29.96in 0 S 0 5.0mph 5.0mph 1 5 3 0.00in

11:10 68.2 - . / 63.2 - . 29.96in S 0 4.0mph 6.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

11:20 68.7 - . / 63.7 - . 29.96in S 0 6.0mph 6.0mph 1 4 3 0.00in

11:, 0 69.4 - . / 64.0 - . 29.96in 0 S 0 3.0mph 3.0mph 1 , 3 0.00in

11:4 0 69.7 - . / 64.3 - . 29.95in SS 0 4.0mph 4.0mph 1 , 3 0.00in

11:5 0 71.1 - . / 65.3 - . 29.95in S 0 3.0mph 3.0mph 1 23 0.00in





12:00 71.7 - . / 65.9 - . 29.95in SS 0 5.0mph 5.0mph 1 23 0.00in

12:10 72.0 - . / 65.5 - . 29.95in South 4.0mph 4.0mph 1 03 0.00in

12:20 73.2 - . / 66.7 - . 29.94in South 2.0mph 2.0mph 1 03 0.00in

12:, 0 74.3 - . / 66.6 - . 29.93in South 3.0mph 6.0mph 773 0.00in

12:4 0 75.1 - . / 67.0 - . 29.93in South 4.0mph 4.0mph 7+ 3 0.00in

12:5 0 75.4 - . / 67.3 - . 29.93in SS 0 2.0mph 7.0mph 7+ 3 0.00in

1, :00 74.8 - . / 67.1 - . 29.93in SS 0 4.0mph 4.0mph 773 0.00in

1, :10 75.0 - . / 67.3 - . 29.93in S 0 2.0mph 2.0mph 773 0.00in

1, :20 75.4 - . / 68.1 - . 29.93in Calm 0.0mph 71 3 0.00in

1, :, 0 75.6 - . / 67.9 - . 29.93in Calm 0.0mph 773 0.00in

1, :4 0 76.2 - . / 68.8 - . 29.93in 0 S 0 1.0mph 1.0mph 71 3 0.00in

1, :5 0 76.3 - . / 68.9 - . 29.93in 0 S 0 3.0mph 3.0mph 71 3 0.00in

14 :00 77.1 - . / 69.3 - . 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 773 0.00in

14 :10 78.7 - . / 70.1 - . 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 75 3 0.00in

14 :20 79.5 - . / 69.7 - . 29.91in SS 0 1.0mph 1.0mph 723 0.00in

14 :, 0 79.3 - . / 69.1 - . 29.91in SS 0 1.0mph 1.0mph 713 0.00in

14 :4 0 79.0 - . / 69.6 - . 29.91in 0 a s t 1.0mph 1.0mph 7, 3 0.00in

14 :5 0 79.5 - . / 70.1 - . 29.91in Calm 3.0mph 7, 3 0.00in

15 :00 80.2 - . 83.4 - . 69.9 - . 29.91in 0 a s t 1.0mph 1.0mph 713 0.00in

15 :10 79.8 - . / 70.0 - . 29.90in Calm 0.0mph 723 0.00in

15 :20 79.4 - . / 69.6 - . 29.90in 6 0 2.0mph 2.0mph 723 0.00in

15 :, 0 78.9 - . / 69.9 - . 29.90in 0 6 0 2.0mph 4.0mph 74 3 0.00in

15 :4 0 78.7 - . / 69.7 - . 29.90in 0 6 0 2.0mph 2.0mph 74 3 0.00in

15 :5 0 79.1 - . / 69.7 - . 29.90in Calm 5.0mph 7, 3 0.00in

1+ :00 78.0 - . / 68.2 - . 29.90in 6 W 8.0mph 8.0mph 723 0.00in

1+ :10 78.8 - . / 68.2 - . 29.90in 6 6 W 9.0mph 9.0mph 703 0.00in

1+ :20 78.7 - . / 67.7 - . 29.90in 6 6 W 10.0mph 11.0mph + 2 3 0.00in

1+ :, 0 77.7 - . / 67.5 - . 29.90in 6 6 W 11.0mph 11.0mph 713 0.00in

1+ :4 0 79.1 - . / 68.1 - . 29.90in 6 6 W 8.0mph 11.0mph + 2 3 0.00in

1+ :5 0 78.7 - . / 67.7 - . 29.90in 6 W 8.0mph 8.0mph + 2 3 0.00in

17:00 79.1 - . / 68.5 - . 29.89in 6 6 W 6.0mph 8.0mph 703 0.00in

17:10 78.9 - . / 67.9 - . 29.89in 6 6 W 6.0mph 6.0mph + 2 3 0.00in

17:20 79.4 - . / 68.3 - . 29.89in 6 orth 5.0mph 5.0mph + 2 3 0.00in





17:30 78.9 °F - 67.0 °F 29.90in NW 7.0mph 8.0mph 67% 0.00in



18:00 77.8 °F - 66.4 °F 29.90in North 6.0mph 6.0mph 68% 0.00in









19:30 73.5 °F - 65.5 °F 29.91in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in

19:40 72.6 °F - 65.3 °F 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in

19:50 72.2 °F - 65.0 °F 29.92in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in

20:00 72.0 °F - 64.8 °F 29.93in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in

20:10 71.7 °F - 64.5 °F 29.94in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in

20:20 71.1 °F - 64.3 °F 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 79% 0.00in

20:30 70.6 °F - 64.1 °F 29.95in Calm 0.0mph 80% 0.00in

20:40 70.3 °F - 64.2 °F 29.96in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

20:50 69.4 °F - 63.3 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 81% 0.00in

21:00 68.5 °F - 63.1 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 83% 0.00in

21:20 67.5 °F - 63.2 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 86% 0.00in

21:30 66.9 °F - 62.9 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 87% 0.00in

21:40 66.2 °F - 62.9 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

21:50 65.8 °F - 62.5 °F 29.97in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

22:00 65.7 °F - 62.7 °F 29.96in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

22:20 66.0 °F - 63.3 °F 29.97in NW 3.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in

22:30 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.98in NW 2.0mph 2.0mph 90% 0.00in

22:40 66.0 °F - 63.0 °F 29.98in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

22:50 65.8 °F - 62.8 °F 29.98in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

23:00 65.4 °F - 62.4 °F 29.98in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

23:10 65.4 °F - 62.7 °F 29.99in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in





23:20 65.6 °F - 62.9 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

23:30 65.8 °F - 63.1 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

23:40 65.7 °F - 63.0 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

23:50 65.7 °F - 63.0 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in






00:00 65.7 °F - 63.0 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

00:10 65.4 °F - 62.4 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 90% 0.00in

00:20 64.9 °F - 62.2 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

00:30 64.9 °F - 62.2 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

00:40 64.4 °F - 61.7 °F 30.01in NW 2.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in

00:50 64.1 °F - 61.4 °F 30.01in NW 4.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in





01:00 64.4 °F - 61.4 °F 30.01in NW 4.0mph 4.0mph 90% 0.00in

01:10 64.4 °F - 61.1 °F 30.02in NW 5.0mph 5.0mph 89% 0.00in

01:20 64.4 °F - 60.8 °F 30.02in NW 2.0mph 2.0mph 88% 0.00in

01:30 64.4 °F - 60.8 °F 30.02in NW 5.0mph 5.0mph 88% 0.00in

01:40 64.3 °F - 60.7 °F 30.02in NW 4.0mph 4.0mph 88% 0.00in

01:50 64.1 °F - 60.5 °F 30.02in NW 3.0mph 3.0mph 88% 0.00in

02:00 63.8 °F - 60.5 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

02:10 63.4 °F - 60.1 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

02:20 63.2 °F - 59.9 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

02:30 62.8 °F - 59.5 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 89% 0.00in

02:40 62.5 °F - 59.5 °F 30.01in Calm 5.0mph 90% 0.00in

02:50 62.5 °F - 59.5 °F 30.01in NW 5.0mph 5.0mph 90% 0.00in

03:00 62.4 °F - 59.7 °F 30.01in NW 4.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in

03:10 62.2 °F - 59.5 °F 30.01in NW 4.0mph 4.0mph 91% 0.00in

03:20 61.8 °F - 59.1 °F 30.02in NW 1.0mph 1.0mph 91% 0.00in

03:30 61.7 °F - 59.0 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

03:40 61.4 °F - 58.7 °F 30.02in Calm 3.0mph 91% 0.00in

03:50 61.3 °F - 59.0 °F 30.02in NW 2.0mph 2.0mph 92% 0.00in

04:00 61.3 °F - 59.0 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

04:10 61.0 °F - 58.7 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 92% 0.00in

04:30 60.4 °F - 58.1 °F 30.03in NW 1.0mph 3.0mph 92% 0.00in

04:40 60.4 °F - 58.4 °F 30.03in NW 3.0mph 3.0mph 93% 0.00in

04:50 60.4 °F - 58.4 °F 30.03in NW 1.0mph 1.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:00 60.3 °F - 58.3 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:10 60.2 °F - 58.2 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:20 59.9 °F - 57.9 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:30 59.8 °F - 57.8 °F 30.04in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:40 59.6 °F - 57.6 °F 30.05in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

05:50 59.1 °F - 57.1 °F 30.05in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

06:00 58.8 °F - 56.8 °F 30.05in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

06:10 59.0 °F - 57.0 °F 30.05in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

06:20 59.0 °F - 57.0 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

06:30 58.6 °F - 56.9 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in





06:40 58.5 °F - 56.8 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

06:50 58.0 °F - 56.3 °F 30.06in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:00 57.7 °F - 56.0 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:10 57.6 °F - 55.9 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:20 57.5 °F - 55.8 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:30 57.8 °F - 56.1 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:40 58.0 °F - 56.3 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

07:50 58.3 °F - 56.6 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

08:00 59.0 °F - 57.3 °F 30.07in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

08:10 59.6 °F - 57.9 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

08:20 60.8 °F - 59.4 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 95% 0.00in

08:30 61.3 °F - 59.6 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

08:40 62.2 °F - 60.5 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 94% 0.00in

08:50 63.1 °F - 61.0 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 93% 0.00in

09:00 64.1 °F - 61.4 °F 30.08in Calm 0.0mph 91% 0.00in

09:10 65.0 °F - 61.4 °F 30.09in NW 2.0mph 2.0mph 88% 0.00in

09:20 65.7 °F - 61.4 °F 30.09in NW 3.0mph 5.0mph 86% 0.00in









10:50 73.0 °F - 61.4 °F 30.11in NW 7.0mph 8.0mph 67% 0.00in



11:20 75.6 °F - 62.1 °F 30.11in NW 5.0mph 7.0mph 63% 0.00in

11:30 76.2 °F - 61.3 °F 30.11in NW 7.0mph 11.0mph 60% 0.00in

11:40 76.6 °F - 61.2 °F 30.11in NW 7.0mph 8.0mph 59% 0.00in









12:30 78.1 °F - 60.6 °F 30.10in NW 6.0mph 7.0mph 55% 0.00in





13:20 79.8 °F - 58.9 °F 30.09in NW 10.0mph 10.0mph 49% 0.00in

13:30 80.3 °F 80.7 °F 57.6 °F 30.08in NNW 7.0mph 10.0mph 46% 0.00in

13:40 80.7 °F 80.9 °F 57.4 °F 30.08in North 7.0mph 7.0mph 45% 0.00in




14:20 81.8 °F - 52.2 °F 30.07in NE 8.0mph 9.0mph 36% 0.00in

14:30 81.4 °F - 51.1 °F 30.06in NE 9.0mph 9.0mph 35% 0.00in



15:00 82.3 °F - 51.9 °F 30.05in NE 7.0mph 7.0mph 35% 0.00in

15:10 82.1 °F 81.2 °F 53.2 °F 30.04in NE 7.0mph 8.0mph 37% 0.00in





16:00 82.5 °F - 52.1 °F 30.03in NE 6.0mph 6.0mph 35% 0.00in


16:20 82.2 °F 81.4 °F 54.1 °F 30.02in ENE 4.0mph 8.0mph 38% 0.00in

















18:30 79.4 °F - 55.6 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 44% 0.00in

18:40 78.4 °F - 55.3 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 45% 0.00in

18:50 77.2 °F - 56.6 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 49% 0.00in

19:00 76.2 °F - 56.2 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 50% 0.00in

19:10 75.4 °F - 55.5 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 50% 0.00in

19:20 74.7 °F - 54.3 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 49% 0.00in

19:30 73.5 °F - 55.3 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 53% 0.00in

19:40 72.0 °F - 54.4 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 54% 0.00in

19:50 71.3 °F - 54.8 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 56% 0.00in

20:00 70.6 °F - 53.6 °F 30.00in Calm 0.0mph 55% 0.00in

20:10 70.6 °F - 54.1 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 56% 0.00in

20:20 69.8 °F - 54.8 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 59% 0.00in

20:30 69.2 °F - 54.7 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 60% 0.00in

20:40 68.0 °F - 54.5 °F 30.01in Calm 0.0mph 62% 0.00in

20:50 67.3 °F - 55.1 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

21:00 66.0 °F - 55.1 °F 30.02in Calm 0.0mph 68% 0.00in

21:20 66.5 °F - 54.4 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 65% 0.00in

21:30 67.0 °F - 54.4 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 64% 0.00in

21:40 67.2 °F - 54.6 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 64% 0.00in

21:50 67.7 °F - 54.2 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 62% 0.00in

22:00 67.9 °F - 54.0 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 61% 0.00in

22:10 67.7 °F - 53.8 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 61% 0.00in

22:20 67.4 °F - 53.9 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 62% 0.00in

22:30 66.2 °F - 53.7 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 64% 0.00in

22:40 64.7 °F - 53.5 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 67% 0.00in

22:50 63.5 °F - 53.5 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 70% 0.00in

23:00 62.8 °F - 52.9 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 70% 0.00in

23:10 62.6 °F - 54.2 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 74% 0.00in





23:20 62.1 °F - 54.4 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in

23:30 61.8 °F - 53.4 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 74% 0.00in

23:40 61.7 °F - 54.1 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 76% 0.00in

23:50 61.1 °F - 54.2 °F 30.03in Calm 0.0mph 78% 0.00in




FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN TULSA FUEL AND ...

Documents

Transcript of FINAL REMEDIAL DESIGN WORK PLAN TULSA FUEL AND ...